Notice of Opportunity for a Hearing on Compliance of Texas State Plan Provisions Concerning Payments for Birthing Center Facility Services With Title XIX (Medicaid) of the Social Security Act, 43761-43762 [E8-17273]
Download as PDF
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 145 / Monday, July 28, 2008 / Notices
Type of Respondents: Parties that
enter into service contracts are ocean
common carriers and agreements among
ocean common carriers on the one hand,
and shippers or shipper’s associations
on the other.
Number of Annual Respondents: The
Commission estimates an annual
respondent universe of 143.
Estimated Time Per Response: The
time per response ranges from .5 to 16
person-hours for reporting and
recordkeeping requirements contained
in the rules, and .5 person-hours for
completing Form FMC–83.
Total Annual Burden: The
Commission estimates the total personhour burden at 617,015 person-hours.
Title: 46 CFR Part 531—NVOCC
Service Arrangements and Related Form
FMC–78.
OMB Approval Number: 3072–0070
(Expires September 30, 2008).
Abstract: The Shipping Act of 1984,
46 U.S.C. 40103, authorizes the FMC to
exempt by rule ‘‘any class of agreements
between persons subject to the Act or
any specified activity of those persons
from any requirement of this Act if it
finds that the exemption will not result
in substantial reduction in competition
or be detrimental to commerce. The
Commission may attach conditions to
any exemption and may, by order,
revoke any exemption.’’ 46 CFR Part 531
allows non-vessel-operating common
carriers (NVOCCs) and shippers’
associations with NVOCC members to
act as shipper parties in NVOCC Service
Arrangements (NSAs), and to be exempt
from certain tariff publication
requirements of the Shipping Act
provided the carriage in question is
done pursuant to an NSA filed with the
Commission and the essential terms are
published in the NVOCC’s tariff.
Current Actions: There are no changes
to this information collection, and it is
being submitted for extension purposes
only.
Type of Review: Extension.
Needs and Uses: The Commission
uses filed NSAs and associated data for
monitoring and investigatory purposes
and, in its proceedings, to adjudicate
related issues raised by private parties.
Frequency: The filing of NSAs is not
assigned a specific time by the
Commission; NSAs are filed as they may
be entered into by private parties. When
parties enter into an NSA, it must be
filed with the Commission.
Type of Respondents: Parties that
enter into NSAs are NVOCCs and
shippers’ associations with NVOCC
members.
Number of Annual Respondents: The
Commission estimates an annual
respondent universe of 533.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:35 Jul 25, 2008
Jkt 214001
Estimated Time Per Response: The
time per response ranges from .5 to 8
person-hours for reporting and
recordkeeping requirements contained
in the rules, and 1 person-hour for
completing Form FMC–78.
Total Annual Burden: The
Commission estimates the total personhour burden at 13,082 person-hours.
Karen V. Gregory,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–17138 Filed 7–25–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730–01–P
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
Use of Voluntary Consensus
Standards in Personal Property
Management; Notice of GSA Bulletin
FMR B–18
Office of Governmentwide
Policy, General Services Administration
(GSA).
ACTION: Notice of a bulletin.
AGENCY:
43761
property management activities.
Voluntary consensus standards are a
valuable tool for the personal property
manager as they represent the collective
wisdom of Federal and private sector
experts covering topics not addressed in
law or governmentwide regulations.
This bulletin is discretionary to
executive agencies.
This notice announces GSA Bulletin
FMR B–18 which provides guidance to
Federal agencies on the use of voluntary
consensus standards in managing the
personal property assets under their
control.
B. Procedures
Bulletins regarding asset management
are located on the Internet at
www.gsa.gov/fmrbulletin as Federal
Management Regulation (FMR)
bulletins.
Dated: July 21, 2008.
Robert Holcombe,
Director, Personal Property Management
Policy.
[FR Doc. E8–17184 Filed 7–25–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–14–S
This notice announces GSA
Federal Management Regulation (FMR)
Bulletin B–18 which provides guidance
to Federal agencies on the use of
voluntary consensus standards in
managing the personal property assets
under their control. This bulletin is
discretionary to executive agencies.
GSA Bulletin FMR B–18 may be found
at www.gsa.gov/fmrbulletin.
DATES: The bulletin announced in this
notice is effective July 17, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT For
clarification of content, contact General
Services Administration, Office of
Governmentwide Policy, Office of
Travel, Transportation and Asset
Management, at (202) 501–1777. Please
cite Bulletin FMR B–18.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
A. Background
Public Law 104–113, the ‘‘National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995,’’ was enacted, in part, to
encourage the use of voluntary
consensus technical standards in lieu of
government-unique standards by
Federal agencies except when
inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
issued OMB Circular A–119 to provide
additional guidance. Subsequently, the
National Property Management
Association (NPMA) and the American
Society for Testing and Materials
(ASTM), now ASTM International,
entered into an agreement to develop
voluntary consensus standards for
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
Notice of Opportunity for a Hearing on
Compliance of Texas State Plan
Provisions Concerning Payments for
Birthing Center Facility Services With
Title XIX (Medicaid) of the Social
Security Act
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Notice of Opportunity for a
Hearing.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice announces the
opportunity for an administrative
hearing to be held on September 26,
2008 at the CMS Dallas Regional Office,
1301 Young Street, Room 1196, Dallas,
Texas 75202, to consider whether Texas
State plan provisions concerning
payments for birthing center facility
services comply with the requirements
of the Social Security Act as discussed
in the July 28, 2008 letter sent to the
State and published herein.
CLOSING DATE: Requests to participate in
the hearing as a party must be received
by the presiding officer by August 27,
2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Benjamin R. Cohen, Presiding Officer,
CMS, 2520 Lord Baltimore Drive, Suite
L, Baltimore, Maryland 21244,
Telephone: (410) 786–3169.
E:\FR\FM\28JYN1.SGM
28JYN1
43762
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 145 / Monday, July 28, 2008 / Notices
This
notice announces the opportunity for an
administrative hearing concerning the
finding of the Administrator of the
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services (CMS) that the approved State
plan under title XIX (Medicaid) of the
Social Security Act (the Act) is not in
compliance with the provisions of
section 1902(a) of the Act. In particular,
CMS has found that the State plan
provides for separate payment for
‘‘birthing center facility services.’’
Birthing centers are not among the
recognized provider types, nor are
birthing center facility services a type of
service within the scope of ‘‘medical
assistance’’ under the framework for
State Medicaid programs established in
Federal law. Further, Federal financial
participation is not available in
expenditures for payments for birthing
center facility services provided on or
after September 1, 2008, subject to the
opportunity for a hearing described
below. This notice is being provided
pursuant to the requirements of section
1904 of the Act, as implemented in part
by Federal regulations at 42 CFR 430.35
and 42 CFR Part 430, Subpart D.
Birthing centers are not a recognized
provider of services within the scope of
‘‘medical assistance’’ under section
1905(a) of the Act. In section 1905(a),
Congress specified certain covered
facility services, such as those provided
by hospitals, clinics, or nursing
facilities, but did not specify the
services of birthing centers. Birthing
centers are not any of those identified
types of covered facilities (specifically,
they do not meet the requirements to be
considered ‘‘clinics’’). Thus, payment to
birthing centers is not payment for
‘‘medical assistance’’ consistent with
section 1905(a), and such payment
therefore is not contemplated by the
references to medical assistance at
section 1902(a)(10) of the Act.
Moreover, section 1902(a)(32) requires
that State plans make payment directly
to the provider of the service, unless
there is an assignment or contractual
arrangement under which the provider
turns over fees to an employer or
permits a facility to bill on his/her
behalf. Neither of these circumstances
apply under the Texas State plan, which
accords birthing center facilities
payment independent of the nurse
midwife practitioners whose services
are covered under section 1905(a)(17) of
the Act. While the Act would permit
higher payments to nurse midwives
practicing at birthing centers in order to
recognize the higher costs that may be
incurred by such nurse midwives, there
is no statutory authority to provide for
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:35 Jul 25, 2008
Jkt 214001
direct payment to birthing centers for
facility services.
While CMS has approved State plan
amendments to provide separate
payment for birthing center facility
services in the past, on further review of
the above-referenced provisions, we do
not believe that the statute allows for
these payments. CMS has previously
notified the State of this position
through prior deferral action and
disapproval of three Medicaid State
plan amendments (SPAs 04–033(b), 06–
004, and 07–011). The first two SPAs
were disapproved on June 29, 2006, and
the third on December 23, 2007. CMS
has deferred claims for the Federal share
totaling $43,507 for three quarters
starting with the period ending June 30,
2006.
The notice to Texas announcing the
opportunity for an administrative
hearing on the issue of the compliance
of the specified State plan provisions
reads as follows:
Via Certified Mail—Return Receipt
Requested
Mr. Chris Traylor, Associate Commissioner
for Medicaid and Children’s Health
Insurance Program, Texas Health and
Human Services Commission, P.O. Box
13247, Austin, TX 78711
Dear Mr. Traylor: This letter provides
notice of our finding that the approved State
plan under title XIX (Medicaid) of the Social
Security Act (the Act) is not in compliance
with the provisions of section 1902(a) of the
Act. In particular, the Centers for Medicare
& Medicaid Services (CMS) has found that
the State plan provides for separate payment
for ‘‘birthing center facility services.’’
Birthing centers are not among the
recognized provider types, nor are birthing
center facility services a type of service
within the scope of ‘‘medical assistance’’
under the framework for State Medicaid
programs established in Federal law. Further,
Federal financial participation is not
available in expenditures for payments for
birthing center facility services provided on
or after September 1, 2008, subject to the
opportunity for a hearing described below.
This notice is being provided pursuant to the
requirements of section 1904 of the Act as
implemented by Federal regulations at 42
CFR 430.35 and 42 CFR Part 430, Subpart D.
Birthing centers are not a recognized
provider of services within the scope of
‘‘medical assistance’’ under section 1905(a)
of the Act. In section 1905(a), Congress
specified certain covered facility services,
such as hospitals, clinics, or nursing
facilities, but did not specify the services of
birthing centers. Birthing centers are not any
of those identified types of covered facilities
(specifically, they do not meet the
requirements to be considered ‘‘clinics’’).
Thus, payment to birthing centers is not
payment for medical assistance consistent
with section 1905(a), and such payment,
therefore, is not contemplated by the
references to medical assistance at section
1902(a)(10) of the Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Moreover, section 1902(a)(32) requires that
State plans make payment directly to the
provider of the service, unless there is an
assignment or contractual arrangement under
which the provider turns over fees to an
employer or permits a facility to bill on his/
her behalf. Neither of these circumstances
apply under the Texas State plan, which
accords birthing center facilities payment
independent of the nurse midwife
practitioner whose services are covered
under section 1905(a)(17) of the Act. While
the Act would permit higher payments to
nurse midwives practicing at birthing centers
in order to recognize the higher costs that
may be incurred by such nurse midwives,
there is no statutory authority to provide for
direct payment to birthing centers for facility
services.
While CMS has approved State plan
amendments to provide separate payment for
birthing center facility services in the past,
on further review of the above-referenced
provisions, we do not believe that the statute
allows for these payments. CMS has
previously notified the State of this position
through a deferral action and disapproval of
three Medicaid State plan amendments
(SPAs 04–033(b), 06–004, and 07–011). The
first two SPAs were disapproved on June 29,
2006, and the third on December 23, 2007.
CMS has deferred claims for the Federal
share totaling $43,507 for three quarters
starting with the period ending June 30,
2006.
For all of these reasons, and after
consulting with the Secretary as required by
42 CFR 430.15(c)(2), I am taking compliance
action on the State’s birthing center facility
payment.
If you are dissatisfied with this
determination, you will have an opportunity
for a hearing on [60 days after date of
publication], in accordance with the
procedure set forth in Federal regulations at
42 CFR Part 430, Subpart D. Your request for
such a hearing may be sent to the designated
hearing officer, Mr. Benjamin R. Cohen,
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services,
2520 Lord Baltimore Drive, Suite L,
Baltimore, Maryland 21244. If you have any
questions or wish to discuss this
determination further, please contact Mr. Bill
Brooks, Associate Regional Administrator,
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services,
Region VI, Division of Medicaid and
Children’s Health, Department of Health and
Human Services, 1301 Young Street, Room
827, Dallas, TX 75202.
Sincerely,
Kerry Weems,
Acting Administrator.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
program No. 13.714, Medicaid Assistance
Program)
Dated: July 23, 2008.
Kerry Weems,
Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare
& Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. E8–17273 Filed 7–25–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
E:\FR\FM\28JYN1.SGM
28JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 145 (Monday, July 28, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43761-43762]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-17273]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Notice of Opportunity for a Hearing on Compliance of Texas State
Plan Provisions Concerning Payments for Birthing Center Facility
Services With Title XIX (Medicaid) of the Social Security Act
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Notice of Opportunity for a Hearing.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces the opportunity for an administrative
hearing to be held on September 26, 2008 at the CMS Dallas Regional
Office, 1301 Young Street, Room 1196, Dallas, Texas 75202, to consider
whether Texas State plan provisions concerning payments for birthing
center facility services comply with the requirements of the Social
Security Act as discussed in the July 28, 2008 letter sent to the State
and published herein.
CLOSING DATE: Requests to participate in the hearing as a party must
be received by the presiding officer by August 27, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Benjamin R. Cohen, Presiding Officer,
CMS, 2520 Lord Baltimore Drive, Suite L, Baltimore, Maryland 21244,
Telephone: (410) 786-3169.
[[Page 43762]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice announces the opportunity for an
administrative hearing concerning the finding of the Administrator of
the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) that the approved
State plan under title XIX (Medicaid) of the Social Security Act (the
Act) is not in compliance with the provisions of section 1902(a) of the
Act. In particular, CMS has found that the State plan provides for
separate payment for ``birthing center facility services.'' Birthing
centers are not among the recognized provider types, nor are birthing
center facility services a type of service within the scope of
``medical assistance'' under the framework for State Medicaid programs
established in Federal law. Further, Federal financial participation is
not available in expenditures for payments for birthing center facility
services provided on or after September 1, 2008, subject to the
opportunity for a hearing described below. This notice is being
provided pursuant to the requirements of section 1904 of the Act, as
implemented in part by Federal regulations at 42 CFR 430.35 and 42 CFR
Part 430, Subpart D.
Birthing centers are not a recognized provider of services within
the scope of ``medical assistance'' under section 1905(a) of the Act.
In section 1905(a), Congress specified certain covered facility
services, such as those provided by hospitals, clinics, or nursing
facilities, but did not specify the services of birthing centers.
Birthing centers are not any of those identified types of covered
facilities (specifically, they do not meet the requirements to be
considered ``clinics''). Thus, payment to birthing centers is not
payment for ``medical assistance'' consistent with section 1905(a), and
such payment therefore is not contemplated by the references to medical
assistance at section 1902(a)(10) of the Act.
Moreover, section 1902(a)(32) requires that State plans make
payment directly to the provider of the service, unless there is an
assignment or contractual arrangement under which the provider turns
over fees to an employer or permits a facility to bill on his/her
behalf. Neither of these circumstances apply under the Texas State
plan, which accords birthing center facilities payment independent of
the nurse midwife practitioners whose services are covered under
section 1905(a)(17) of the Act. While the Act would permit higher
payments to nurse midwives practicing at birthing centers in order to
recognize the higher costs that may be incurred by such nurse midwives,
there is no statutory authority to provide for direct payment to
birthing centers for facility services.
While CMS has approved State plan amendments to provide separate
payment for birthing center facility services in the past, on further
review of the above-referenced provisions, we do not believe that the
statute allows for these payments. CMS has previously notified the
State of this position through prior deferral action and disapproval of
three Medicaid State plan amendments (SPAs 04-033(b), 06-004, and 07-
011). The first two SPAs were disapproved on June 29, 2006, and the
third on December 23, 2007. CMS has deferred claims for the Federal
share totaling $43,507 for three quarters starting with the period
ending June 30, 2006.
The notice to Texas announcing the opportunity for an
administrative hearing on the issue of the compliance of the specified
State plan provisions reads as follows:
Via Certified Mail--Return Receipt Requested
Mr. Chris Traylor, Associate Commissioner for Medicaid and
Children's Health Insurance Program, Texas Health and Human Services
Commission, P.O. Box 13247, Austin, TX 78711
Dear Mr. Traylor: This letter provides notice of our finding
that the approved State plan under title XIX (Medicaid) of the
Social Security Act (the Act) is not in compliance with the
provisions of section 1902(a) of the Act. In particular, the Centers
for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has found that the State plan
provides for separate payment for ``birthing center facility
services.'' Birthing centers are not among the recognized provider
types, nor are birthing center facility services a type of service
within the scope of ``medical assistance'' under the framework for
State Medicaid programs established in Federal law. Further, Federal
financial participation is not available in expenditures for
payments for birthing center facility services provided on or after
September 1, 2008, subject to the opportunity for a hearing
described below. This notice is being provided pursuant to the
requirements of section 1904 of the Act as implemented by Federal
regulations at 42 CFR 430.35 and 42 CFR Part 430, Subpart D.
Birthing centers are not a recognized provider of services
within the scope of ``medical assistance'' under section 1905(a) of
the Act. In section 1905(a), Congress specified certain covered
facility services, such as hospitals, clinics, or nursing
facilities, but did not specify the services of birthing centers.
Birthing centers are not any of those identified types of covered
facilities (specifically, they do not meet the requirements to be
considered ``clinics''). Thus, payment to birthing centers is not
payment for medical assistance consistent with section 1905(a), and
such payment, therefore, is not contemplated by the references to
medical assistance at section 1902(a)(10) of the Act.
Moreover, section 1902(a)(32) requires that State plans make
payment directly to the provider of the service, unless there is an
assignment or contractual arrangement under which the provider turns
over fees to an employer or permits a facility to bill on his/her
behalf. Neither of these circumstances apply under the Texas State
plan, which accords birthing center facilities payment independent
of the nurse midwife practitioner whose services are covered under
section 1905(a)(17) of the Act. While the Act would permit higher
payments to nurse midwives practicing at birthing centers in order
to recognize the higher costs that may be incurred by such nurse
midwives, there is no statutory authority to provide for direct
payment to birthing centers for facility services.
While CMS has approved State plan amendments to provide separate
payment for birthing center facility services in the past, on
further review of the above-referenced provisions, we do not believe
that the statute allows for these payments. CMS has previously
notified the State of this position through a deferral action and
disapproval of three Medicaid State plan amendments (SPAs 04-033(b),
06-004, and 07-011). The first two SPAs were disapproved on June 29,
2006, and the third on December 23, 2007. CMS has deferred claims
for the Federal share totaling $43,507 for three quarters starting
with the period ending June 30, 2006.
For all of these reasons, and after consulting with the
Secretary as required by 42 CFR 430.15(c)(2), I am taking compliance
action on the State's birthing center facility payment.
If you are dissatisfied with this determination, you will have
an opportunity for a hearing on [60 days after date of publication],
in accordance with the procedure set forth in Federal regulations at
42 CFR Part 430, Subpart D. Your request for such a hearing may be
sent to the designated hearing officer, Mr. Benjamin R. Cohen,
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2520 Lord Baltimore Drive,
Suite L, Baltimore, Maryland 21244. If you have any questions or
wish to discuss this determination further, please contact Mr. Bill
Brooks, Associate Regional Administrator, Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services, Region VI, Division of Medicaid and Children's
Health, Department of Health and Human Services, 1301 Young Street,
Room 827, Dallas, TX 75202.
Sincerely,
Kerry Weems,
Acting Administrator.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance program No. 13.714, Medicaid
Assistance Program)
Dated: July 23, 2008.
Kerry Weems,
Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. E8-17273 Filed 7-25-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P