Airworthiness Directives; MD Helicopters, Inc. Model MD900 (including the MD902 Configuration) Helicopters, 43646-43648 [E8-17262]
Download as PDF
43646
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 145 / Monday, July 28, 2008 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 1.—AIRPLANES AFFECTED BY THIS AD
McDonnell Douglas model—
Identified in—
Referenced in—
DC–10–10, DC–10–10F, DC–10–15, DC–10–30, DC–10–30F (KC–
10A and KDC–10), DC–10–40, DC–10–40F, MD–10–10F, and
MD–10–30F airplanes.
MD–11 and MD–11F airplanes ..........................................................
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin DC10–29A144,
Revision 2, dated August 1, 2003.
Paragraph (f) of this AD.
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD11–29A059,
Revision 2, dated August 1, 2003.
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin DC10–29A148,
dated March 20, 2008.
Paragraph (g) of this AD.
DC–10–10, DC–10–10F, DC–10–15, DC–10–30, DC–10–30F (KC–
10A and KDC–10), DC–10–40, and DC–10–40F airplanes.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from reports of failure
of the electric motor for the auxiliary
hydraulic pump. We are issuing this AD to
prevent failure of the electric motors of the
hydraulic pump and associated wiring,
which could result in fire at the auxiliary
hydraulic pump and consequent damage to
the adjacent electrical equipment and/or
structure.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
yshivers on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Restatement of the Requirements of AD
2004–05–20
Modification/Prior or Concurrent Actions
(f) For Model DC–10–10, DC–10–10F, DC–
10–15, DC–10–30, DC–10–30F (KC–10A and
KDC–10), DC–10–40, DC–10–40F, MD–10–
10F, and MD–10–30F airplanes listed in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin DC10–29A144,
Revision 2, dated August 1, 2003: Within 18
months after April 15, 2004 (the effective
date of AD 2004–05–20), do the actions
specified in paragraphs (f)(1) and (f)(2) of this
AD.
(1) Modify the installation wiring of the
electric motor operated auxiliary hydraulic
pumps in the right wheel well area of the
main landing gear (MLG) (including
removing existing clamps, ground wires, if
required, and sleeving from the wire
assemblies; inspecting for cracks and chafing,
installing new support bracket, clips, and
bracket assemblies, as applicable; installing
sleeving; re-routing and attaching wire
assemblies using new clamps and
attachments; installing an additional routing
clip on the lower bracket of the fuel motor
control valve, if applicable; and doing a
voltage check and a functional test), per the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin DC10–29A144, Revision 2,
dated August 1, 2003.
(2) Prior to or concurrently with
accomplishment of paragraph (f)(1) or (h) of
this AD: Do the actions specified in Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin DC10–29A142,
Revision 02, dated April 17, 2003; or
Revision 3, dated October 15, 2005;
(including inspecting the numbers 1 and 2
electric motors of the auxiliary hydraulic
pumps for electrical resistance, continuity,
mechanical rotation, and associated airplane
wiring resistance/voltage; and replacing the
auxiliary hydraulic pump with a serviceable
pump and repairing the wiring if necessary),
per the Accomplishment Instructions of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:00 Jul 25, 2008
Jkt 214001
service bulletin. Repeat the actions after that
at intervals not to exceed 2,500 flight hours.
After the effective date of this AD, Revision
3 must be used.
(g) For Model MD–11 and MD–11F
airplanes listed in Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin MD11–29A059, Revision 2, dated
August 1, 2003: Within 18 months after April
15, 2004, do the actions specified in
paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD.
(1) Modify the installation wiring of the
electric motor auxiliary hydraulic pumps in
the wheel well area of the right MLG
(including removing and retaining wire
assembly clamps, if applicable; retaining the
existing ground wire assemblies; retaining or
replacing all other wire assemblies for both
connectors; installing spiral wrap and
sleeving; wrapping upper ends of individual
wires with tape; installing new support
bracket assemblies, if applicable; re-routing
and attaching wire assemblies using new
clamps and attachments, if applicable; and
doing a voltage check and a functional test),
per the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD11–29A059,
Revision 2, dated August 1, 2003.
(2) Prior to or concurrently with
accomplishment of paragraph (g)(1) of this
AD: Do the actions specified in Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin MD11–29A057, Revision 02,
dated April 17, 2003 (including inspecting
the numbers 1 and 2 electric motors of the
auxiliary hydraulic pumps for electrical
resistance, continuity, mechanical rotation,
and associated airplane wiring resistance/
voltage; and replacing the auxiliary hydraulic
pump with a serviceable pump and repairing
the wiring if necessary), per the
Accomplishment Instructions of the service
bulletin. Repeat the actions after that at
intervals not to exceed 2,500 flight hours.
New Requirements of This AD
(h) For Model DC–10–10, DC–10–10F, DC–
10–15, DC–10–30, DC–10–30F (KC–10A and
KDC–10), DC–10–40, and DC–10–40F
airplanes identified in Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin DC10–29A148, dated March 20,
2008: Within 24 months after the effective
date of this AD, modify and reroute, as
applicable, components of the wiring of the
electric motor for the auxiliary hydraulic
pump located in the right wheel well, and do
all applicable investigative and corrective
actions before further flight. Do all actions in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
DC10–29A148, dated March 20, 2008. The
concurrent requirements, including the
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
repetitive inspections, of paragraph (f)(2) of
this AD continue to apply to these airplanes.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(i)(1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested in accordance with the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector
(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District
Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 21,
2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–17198 Filed 7–25–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2008–0772; Directorate
Identifier 2008–SW–30–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; MD
Helicopters, Inc. Model MD900
(including the MD902 Configuration)
Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
Modification and Rerouting
PO 00000
Paragraph (h) of this AD.
SUMMARY: This document proposes
adopting a new airworthiness directive
(AD) for the specified MD Helicopters,
Inc. (MDHI) model helicopters that
would require, within 30 days, reducing
the current gross weight limit to a
maximum gross weight limit of 5,400
pounds and inserting a copy of this AD
into the Limitations section of the
Rotorcraft Flight Manual (RFM) or
making certain optional modifications
that constitute terminating actions. This
E:\FR\FM\28JYP1.SGM
28JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 145 / Monday, July 28, 2008 / Proposed Rules
proposal is prompted by flight tests that
show that the information currently
listed in the Limitations section of the
RFM is inconsistent with the actual
performance of the helicopter. The
actions specified by the proposed AD
are intended to prevent loss of
directional control of the helicopter.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before September 26, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to submit comments on this
proposed AD:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
You may get the service information
identified in this proposed AD from MD
Helicopters Inc., Attn: Customer
Support Division, 4555 E. McDowell
Rd., Mail Stop M615, Mesa, Arizona
85215–9734, telephone 1–800–388–
3378, fax 480–346–6813, or on the Web
at https://www.mdhelicopters.com.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chip Adam, Flight Test Pilot, FAA, Los
Angeles Aircraft Certification Office,
Flight Test Branch, 3960 Paramount
Blvd., Lakewood, California 90712–
4137, telephone (562) 627–5369, fax
(562) 627–5210.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
yshivers on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Comments Invited
We invite you to submit any written
data, views, or arguments regarding this
proposed AD. Send your comments to
the address listed under the caption
ADDRESSES. Include the docket number
‘‘FAA–2008–0772, Directorate Identifier
2008–SW–30–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of the proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend the
proposed AD in light of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:00 Jul 25, 2008
Jkt 214001
personnel concerning this proposed
rulemaking. Using the search function
of our docket web site, you can find and
read the comments to any of our
dockets, including the name of the
individual who sent or signed the
comment. You may review the DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11,
2000.
Examining the Docket
You may examine the docket that
contains the proposed AD, any
comments, and other information in
person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The Docket Operations office (telephone
(800) 647–5527) is located in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
West Building at the street address
stated in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
Discussion
This proposed amendment would
apply to MDHI Model MD900
(including the MD902 Configuration)
helicopters. This proposed amendment
is prompted by flight tests related to a
proposed type design change that
showed that the critical wind azimuth
in hover calculated during original
certification as depicted in the
Limitations section of the RFM is in
error. RFM Figure 2–2, ‘‘Controllability
Envelope and Critical Azimuth for
Crosswind Operation,’’ which shows an
envelope of adequate control capability
for weights up to the maximum weight
in winds of 17 knots or less from any
azimuth and in winds of 15 knots or less
from the 120° to 135° azimuth region, is
inconsistent with the actual
performance of the helicopter as
demonstrated in recent flight tests. Use
of this incorrect information could lead
a pilot to believe that, at gross weights
and altitudes at or near the upper
boundary of the envelope, the helicopter
is fully controllable with sustained
crosswinds or winds within the critical
wind azimuth area; the recent flight
tests have shown otherwise. This
condition, if not corrected, could result
in loss of directional control of the
helicopter.
We have reviewed MDHI SB900–099
R1, dated December 27, 2006, which
describes procedures for adjusting the
directional control system rigging,
installing a thruster extension kit, and
verifying that a NOTAR fan felt seal,
part number (P/N) 900F3441025–103 is
installed. The SB specifies that failure to
comply with the procedures may result
in reduced anti-torque control during
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
43647
certain combinations of high gross
weight, density altitude, and wind
critical conditions. The SB also
indicates that the maximum gross
weight of the helicopter will be lowered
if the SB is not complied with.
This unsafe condition is likely to exist
or develop on other helicopters of the
same type designs. Therefore, the
proposed AD would require, for
helicopters that have not complied with
MDHI SB900–099 R1, reducing the gross
weight limit to a maximum gross weight
limit of 5,400 pounds and inserting a
copy of the AD into the Limitations
section of the RFM. These actions
would be required within 30 days. The
proposed AD would also include
optional terminating actions for the
weight reduction. Those terminating
actions would be to:
• Determine if a NOTAR fan felt seal
part number (P/N) 900F3441025–103 is
installed. If a NOTAR fan felt seal, P/N
900F3441025–103, is not installed,
replace the installed seal with an
airworthy NOTAR fan felt seal, P/N
900F3441025–103, before further flight;
and
• Install a thruster extension kit in
accordance with specified portions of
the service bulletin described
previously.
We estimate that this proposed AD
would affect 31 helicopters of U.S.
registry. The estimated lost revenue
attributable to the gross weight
reduction would be $1,750,000 per
helicopter over the life of the helicopter.
It would take approximately 1⁄2 work
hour per helicopter to insert the
proposed AD into the Limitations
section of the RFM; 8 work hours to
adjust the directional control system
rigging; 8 work hours to install a
NOTAR fan felt seal; and 24 work hours
to install a thruster extension kit at an
average labor rate of $80 per work hour.
The NOTAR fan felt seal and thruster
extension kit would cost approximately
$16,000. However, the manufacturer has
stated that they would provide the fan
felt seal and the thruster extension kit
to all operators at no cost to them and
that they will also provide each affected
operator a credit for the labor costs for
a total of 32 work hours for those work
hours required to perform the
directional control rigging adjustment (8
work hours) and installation of the
thruster extension kit (24 work hours).
Based on these figures, the total
estimated cost impact of this proposed
AD on U.S. operators would be $1,920,
assuming (1) the entire fleet chooses to
modify their affected helicopter in
accordance with the optional
terminating action provision of this
proposal and there is no reduction in
E:\FR\FM\28JYP1.SGM
28JYP1
43648
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 145 / Monday, July 28, 2008 / Proposed Rules
gross weight necessary, (2) the
manufacturer covers all the costs of the
parts and the labor costs associated with
the rigging adjustment and installation
of the thruster extension kit and (3) only
3 helicopters need to have a new fan felt
seal installed.
Administrator, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend part
39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations
(14 CFR part 39) as follows:
Regulatory Findings
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
We have determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. Additionally, this proposed AD
would not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a draft economic
evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD. See the
AD docket to examine the draft
economic evaluation.
Authority for This Rulemaking
yshivers on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me by the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:00 Jul 25, 2008
Jkt 214001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
[Docket No. FAA–2008–0071; Directorate
Identifier 2006–SW–27–AD]
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by
adding a new airworthiness directive to
read as follows:
MD Helicopters, Inc.: Docket No. FAA–2008–
0772; Directorate Identifier 2008–SW–
30–AD.
Applicability: Model MD900 (including
MD902 Configuration) helicopters that have
not complied with MD Helicopters, Inc.
(MDHI) Service Bulletin SB900–099 R1,
dated December 27, 2006, certificated in any
category.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless
accomplished previously.
To prevent loss of directional control of the
helicopter, accomplish the following:
(a) Within 30 days, reduce the gross weight
limit to a maximum gross weight limit of
5,400 pounds by inserting a copy of this AD
into the Limitations section of the RFM.
(b) As an optional terminating action for
the weight reduction mandated by paragraph
(a) of this AD, accomplish the following:
(1) Determine if a NOTAR fan felt seal part
number (P/N) 900F3441025–103 is installed.
If a NOTAR fan felt seal, P/N 900F3441025–
103, is not installed, replace the installed seal
with an airworthy NOTAR fan felt seal, P/N
900F3441025–103, before further flight.
(2) Install a thruster extension kit in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions, paragraph B. (3). through (17).
of MDHI SB900–099 R1, dated December 27,
2006 (SB), before further flight. Contacting
the manufacturer is not required by this AD.
(c) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Contact the Manager, Los Angeles
Aircraft Certification Office, Attn: Chip
Adam, Flight Test Pilot, FAA, Flight Test
Branch, 3960 Paramount Blvd., Lakewood,
California 90712–4137, telephone (562) 627–
5369, fax (562) 627–5210, for information
about previously approved alternative
methods of compliance.
(d) Special flight permits will not be
issued.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on July 8,
2008.
Mark R. Schilling,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–17262 Filed 7–25–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bell
Helicopter Textron Canada Model 222,
222B, 222U, 230, and 430 Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document proposes
superseding an existing airworthiness
directive (AD) for Bell Helicopter
Textron Canada (BHTC) helicopters.
That AD currently requires certain
checks and inspections of the tail rotor
blades. If a crack is found, the existing
AD requires replacing the tail rotor
blade (blade) with an airworthy blade
before further flight. This action would
require the same checks and inspections
until they are required to be replaced
and would remove certain serial
numbered and specifically coded tail
rotor blades from the applicability of the
AD. This proposal is prompted by the
approved rework of certain tail rotor
blades and two newly redesigned tail
rotor blades, which, if installed,
constitutes terminating action for the
inspection requirements. The actions
specified by the proposed AD are
intended to detect a crack in a blade,
and to prevent loss of a blade and
subsequent loss of control of the
helicopter.
Comments must be received on
or before September 26, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to submit comments on this
proposed AD:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building, Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building, Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
You may get the service information
identified in this proposed AD from Bell
Helicopter Textron Canada, 12,800 Rue
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\28JYP1.SGM
28JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 145 (Monday, July 28, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 43646-43648]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-17262]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2008-0772; Directorate Identifier 2008-SW-30-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; MD Helicopters, Inc. Model MD900
(including the MD902 Configuration) Helicopters
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document proposes adopting a new airworthiness directive
(AD) for the specified MD Helicopters, Inc. (MDHI) model helicopters
that would require, within 30 days, reducing the current gross weight
limit to a maximum gross weight limit of 5,400 pounds and inserting a
copy of this AD into the Limitations section of the Rotorcraft Flight
Manual (RFM) or making certain optional modifications that constitute
terminating actions. This
[[Page 43647]]
proposal is prompted by flight tests that show that the information
currently listed in the Limitations section of the RFM is inconsistent
with the actual performance of the helicopter. The actions specified by
the proposed AD are intended to prevent loss of directional control of
the helicopter.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 26, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to submit comments on
this proposed AD:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
You may get the service information identified in this proposed AD
from MD Helicopters Inc., Attn: Customer Support Division, 4555 E.
McDowell Rd., Mail Stop M615, Mesa, Arizona 85215-9734, telephone 1-
800-388-3378, fax 480-346-6813, or on the Web at https://
www.mdhelicopters.com.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chip Adam, Flight Test Pilot, FAA, Los
Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, Flight Test Branch, 3960
Paramount Blvd., Lakewood, California 90712-4137, telephone (562) 627-
5369, fax (562) 627-5210.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to submit any written data, views, or arguments
regarding this proposed AD. Send your comments to the address listed
under the caption ADDRESSES. Include the docket number ``FAA-2008-0772,
Directorate Identifier 2008-SW-30-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend the
proposed AD in light of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact
with FAA personnel concerning this proposed rulemaking. Using the
search function of our docket web site, you can find and read the
comments to any of our dockets, including the name of the individual
who sent or signed the comment. You may review the DOT's complete
Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11,
2000.
Examining the Docket
You may examine the docket that contains the proposed AD, any
comments, and other information in person at the Docket Operations
office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
located in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the West Building at the
street address stated in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
Discussion
This proposed amendment would apply to MDHI Model MD900 (including
the MD902 Configuration) helicopters. This proposed amendment is
prompted by flight tests related to a proposed type design change that
showed that the critical wind azimuth in hover calculated during
original certification as depicted in the Limitations section of the
RFM is in error. RFM Figure 2-2, ``Controllability Envelope and
Critical Azimuth for Crosswind Operation,'' which shows an envelope of
adequate control capability for weights up to the maximum weight in
winds of 17 knots or less from any azimuth and in winds of 15 knots or
less from the 120[deg] to 135[deg] azimuth region, is inconsistent with
the actual performance of the helicopter as demonstrated in recent
flight tests. Use of this incorrect information could lead a pilot to
believe that, at gross weights and altitudes at or near the upper
boundary of the envelope, the helicopter is fully controllable with
sustained crosswinds or winds within the critical wind azimuth area;
the recent flight tests have shown otherwise. This condition, if not
corrected, could result in loss of directional control of the
helicopter.
We have reviewed MDHI SB900-099 R1, dated December 27, 2006, which
describes procedures for adjusting the directional control system
rigging, installing a thruster extension kit, and verifying that a
NOTAR fan felt seal, part number (P/N) 900F3441025-103 is installed.
The SB specifies that failure to comply with the procedures may result
in reduced anti-torque control during certain combinations of high
gross weight, density altitude, and wind critical conditions. The SB
also indicates that the maximum gross weight of the helicopter will be
lowered if the SB is not complied with.
This unsafe condition is likely to exist or develop on other
helicopters of the same type designs. Therefore, the proposed AD would
require, for helicopters that have not complied with MDHI SB900-099 R1,
reducing the gross weight limit to a maximum gross weight limit of
5,400 pounds and inserting a copy of the AD into the Limitations
section of the RFM. These actions would be required within 30 days. The
proposed AD would also include optional terminating actions for the
weight reduction. Those terminating actions would be to:
Determine if a NOTAR fan felt seal part number (P/N)
900F3441025-103 is installed. If a NOTAR fan felt seal, P/N
900F3441025-103, is not installed, replace the installed seal with an
airworthy NOTAR fan felt seal, P/N 900F3441025-103, before further
flight; and
Install a thruster extension kit in accordance with
specified portions of the service bulletin described previously.
We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 31 helicopters of
U.S. registry. The estimated lost revenue attributable to the gross
weight reduction would be $1,750,000 per helicopter over the life of
the helicopter. It would take approximately \1/2\ work hour per
helicopter to insert the proposed AD into the Limitations section of
the RFM; 8 work hours to adjust the directional control system rigging;
8 work hours to install a NOTAR fan felt seal; and 24 work hours to
install a thruster extension kit at an average labor rate of $80 per
work hour. The NOTAR fan felt seal and thruster extension kit would
cost approximately $16,000. However, the manufacturer has stated that
they would provide the fan felt seal and the thruster extension kit to
all operators at no cost to them and that they will also provide each
affected operator a credit for the labor costs for a total of 32 work
hours for those work hours required to perform the directional control
rigging adjustment (8 work hours) and installation of the thruster
extension kit (24 work hours). Based on these figures, the total
estimated cost impact of this proposed AD on U.S. operators would be
$1,920, assuming (1) the entire fleet chooses to modify their affected
helicopter in accordance with the optional terminating action provision
of this proposal and there is no reduction in
[[Page 43648]]
gross weight necessary, (2) the manufacturer covers all the costs of
the parts and the labor costs associated with the rigging adjustment
and installation of the thruster extension kit and (3) only 3
helicopters need to have a new fan felt seal installed.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. Additionally, this proposed
AD would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a draft economic evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD. See the AD docket to examine the draft
economic evaluation.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend
part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as
follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding a new airworthiness directive
to read as follows:
MD Helicopters, Inc.: Docket No. FAA-2008-0772; Directorate
Identifier 2008-SW-30-AD.
Applicability: Model MD900 (including MD902 Configuration)
helicopters that have not complied with MD Helicopters, Inc. (MDHI)
Service Bulletin SB900-099 R1, dated December 27, 2006, certificated
in any category.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent loss of directional control of the helicopter,
accomplish the following:
(a) Within 30 days, reduce the gross weight limit to a maximum
gross weight limit of 5,400 pounds by inserting a copy of this AD
into the Limitations section of the RFM.
(b) As an optional terminating action for the weight reduction
mandated by paragraph (a) of this AD, accomplish the following:
(1) Determine if a NOTAR fan felt seal part number (P/N)
900F3441025-103 is installed. If a NOTAR fan felt seal, P/N
900F3441025-103, is not installed, replace the installed seal with
an airworthy NOTAR fan felt seal, P/N 900F3441025-103, before
further flight.
(2) Install a thruster extension kit in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph B. (3). through (17). of MDHI
SB900-099 R1, dated December 27, 2006 (SB), before further flight.
Contacting the manufacturer is not required by this AD.
(c) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Contact the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office,
Attn: Chip Adam, Flight Test Pilot, FAA, Flight Test Branch, 3960
Paramount Blvd., Lakewood, California 90712-4137, telephone (562)
627-5369, fax (562) 627-5210, for information about previously
approved alternative methods of compliance.
(d) Special flight permits will not be issued.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on July 8, 2008.
Mark R. Schilling,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8-17262 Filed 7-25-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P