Genesis Inc. 2009 Exploration Drilling Project; Kootenai National Forest, Lincoln County, MT, 43400-43402 [E8-17063]
Download as PDF
43400
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 144 / Friday, July 25, 2008 / Notices
USDA’s efforts to respond to the
suspected or confirmed compromise
and prevent, minimize, or remedy such
harm.
STORAGE:
Records are maintained in software
applications, and some information is
also stored in file folders.
*
*
*
*
*
USDA/OIG–7
SYSTEM NAME:
Freedom of Information Act and
Privacy Act Request Records, USDA/
OIG.
*
*
*
*
*
ROUTINE USES OF RECORDS MAINTAINED IN THE
SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATEGORIES OF USERS AND
THE PURPOSES OF SUCH:
*
*
*
*
*
16. To appropriate agencies, entities,
and persons when (1) OIG suspects or
has confirmed that the security or
confidentiality of information in the
system of records has been
compromised; (2) USDA has determined
that as a result of the suspected or
confirmed compromise there is a risk of
harm to economic or property interests,
identity theft or fraud, or harm to the
security or integrity of this system or
other systems or programs (whether
maintained by USDA or another agency
or entity) that rely upon the
compromised information; and (3) the
disclosure made to such agencies,
entities, and persons is reasonably
necessary to assist in connection with
USDA’s efforts to respond to the
suspected or confirmed compromise
and prevent, minimize, or remedy such
harm.
STORAGE:
Records are maintained in software
applications, and some information is
also stored in file folders.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E8–17052 Filed 7–24–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–23–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Commodity Credit Corporation
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
2008-Crop Marketing Assistance Loans
and Loan Deficiency Payments for
Cotton and Peanuts
Commodity Credit Corporation,
USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: As announced by this notice,
the Commodity Credit Corporation
(CCC) is implementing provisions of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:15 Jul 24, 2008
Jkt 214001
Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of
2008 (2008 Farm Bill) regarding
Marketing Assistance Loans (MAL) and
Loan Deficiency Payments (LDP) for
2008 crop cotton and peanuts. The 2008
Farm Bill authorizes the continuation of
the MAL and LDP programs for the 2008
through 2012 crops. This notice
specifies how CCC will administer 2008
crop MAL and LDP provisions.
DATES: Effective Date: July 25, 2008
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Candace Thompson, Director, Price
Support Division, Farm Service Agency,
USDA, STOP 0512, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250–
0512; telephone: (202) 720–7901 or fax:
(202) 690–3307; e-mail:
candy.thompson@wdc.usda.gov.
Persons with disabilities who require
alternative means for communication
(Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.)
should contact the USDA Target Center
at (202) 720–2600 (voice and TDD).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: CCC
administers a loan program, including
MAL and LDP, that provides short-term
financing to allow farmers to pay their
bills soon after harvest and to facilitate
orderly marketing throughout the rest of
the year. The loan program also
provides significant income support
when market prices are below statutory
loan rates. Currently, regulations in 7
CFR parts 1421, 1425, and 1427 cover
MAL and LDP provisions for the 2002
through 2007 crop years.
The 2008 Farm Bill (Pub. L. 110–246)
authorizes the continuation of MAL and
LDP for cotton and peanuts for the 2008
through 2012 crops.
With the pending harvest of 2008crop cotton and peanuts, this notice
announces that CCC will, with the
exceptions noted below, immediately
implement MAL and LDP provisions for
2008-crop cotton and peanuts based on
the regulations that applied to the 2007
crop and appeared in:
• 7 CFR part 1421, Grains and
Similarly Handled Commodities—
Marketing Assistance Loans and Loan
Deficiency Payments for the 2002
through 2007 Crop Years;
• 7 CFR part 1425, Cooperative
Marketing Associations; and
• 7 CFR part 1427, Cotton.
To address the 2008 exceptions and
for the 2009 through 2012 crops, CCC
will amend the applicable regulations to
reflect changes required by the 2008
Farm Bill including the fine count
adjustment, storage credit rates, and
transportation costs. The 2008
exceptions are as follows. For cotton,
the calculation of the prevailing world
market price, for repayment purposes,
will continue to be calculated as
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
specified in the current regulations.
Also, for cotton, storage payments will
be allowed to the extent permitted in
the current regulations. For peanuts,
handling and storage costs will be
allowed to the extent permitted in the
current regulations. These three 2008
exceptions will be changed later to
implement the requirements of the 2008
Farm Bill through rulemaking instead of
being made effective now because the
software development required to
implement the changes is not
immediately available.
Additionally, CCC revised
regulations, effective on May 23, 2008
(73 FR 30274–30277, final rule
published May 27, 2008) providing that
Far East prices will be used instead of
Northern Europe prices in determining
the upland cotton adjusted world price
(AWP). The revised AWP calculation
applies to the 2007 through the 2012
crops of upland cotton.
Environmental Review
FSA has determined that these
changes would not constitute a major
Federal action that would significantly
affect the quality of the human
environment. Therefore, in accordance
with the provisions of the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), 42
U.S.C. 4321–4347, the regulations of the
Council on Environmental Quality (40
CFR parts 1500–1508), and FSA
regulations for compliance with NEPA
(7 CFR part 799), no environmental
assessment or environmental impact
statement will be prepared.
Signed at Washington, DC on July 21, 2008.
Teresa C. Lasseter,
Executive Vice President, Commodity Credit
Corporation.
[FR Doc. E8–17001 Filed 7–24–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Genesis Inc. 2009 Exploration Drilling
Project; Kootenai National Forest,
Lincoln County, MT
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Kootenai
National Forest will prepare an
environmental impact statement (EIS) to
document the analysis and disclose the
environmental impacts of the proposed
action to conduct a helicopter-assisted
exploration drilling project near Troy,
Montana. Genesis, Inc. submitted a
E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM
25JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 144 / Friday, July 25, 2008 / Notices
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
proposed Plan of Operations on June 19,
2008, pursuant to Forest Service
locatable mineral regulations 36 CFR
228, Subpart A. A single EIS, evaluating
all components of the proposed project
will be prepared.
Scoping Comment Date: Comments
concerning the proposed action must be
postmarked by August 25, 2008, to be
considered in the draft EIS.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments
concerning the Proposed Action to Mike
Herrin, Three Rivers District Ranger,
Genesis Exploration Project, Kootenai
National Forest, 12858 U.S. Hwy. 2,
Troy, MT 59935, or e-mail your
comments to: comments-northernkootenai-threerivers@fs.fed.us. All
comments received must contain: Name
of commenter, postal service mailing
address, and date of comment.
Comments sent as an e-mail message
should be sent as an attachment to the
message. A copy on computer-generated
disc should accompany all comments
over one page in length.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dick
Harlow, Project Coordinator, Three
River Ranger Station, 12858 U.S. Hwy.
2, Troy, Montana 59935. Phone (406)
293–7773, or e-mail at
dharlow@fs.fed.us.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Proposed Action
The Three Rivers District Ranger of
the Kootenai National Forest has
received a plan of operations proposing
to access three (3) helicopter-supported
drill sites on NFS lands in sections 7,
17, & 18, T28N, R33W, MT. P.M.,
southwest of Bull Lake, in Lincoln and
Sanders Counties. These sites were
previously drilled in 1999 and this
additional exploration drilling is needed
to further define ore reserves on the
unpatented mining claims. The proposal
is to drill 8 core holes from 3 separate
locations, utilizing existing openings
from previous helicopter drill sites. The
holes will vary from 100′ to 1600′ in
depth.
The Drilling Plan for the drill sites is
to use a pre-constructed metal landing/
drill platform (approx. 30′ long x 15′
wide). The platform will be flown to the
sites in sections and assembled. The
drill will be mounted on the drill
platforms on the south side of Ross
Creek.
A helicopter staging site will be
located near the junction of FR 4628 and
FR 4628A. Some site maintenance will
be required. This work will include
removal of brush and short trees.
Design features and mitigations to
maintain and protect resource values
would be included.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:15 Jul 24, 2008
Jkt 214001
The proposed implementation period
would be June 16, 2009, through
November 15, 2009.
Lead and Cooperating Agencies
Montana Department of
Environmental Quality, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Montana Department
of Natural Resources and Conservation,
Confederated Salish and Kootenai
Tribes, and Kootenai Tribe of Idaho,
have either jurisdiction or interest and
will participate as cooperating agencies
or government entities in the
preparation of this EIS. Other
governmental agencies and any public
that may be interested in or affected by
the proposal are invited to participate in
the scoping process, which is designed
to obtain input and to identify potential
issues relating to the proposed project.
Responsible Official
As the District Ranger of the Three
Rivers Ranger District, Kootenai
National Forest, I am the Responsible
Official. As the Responsible Official, I
will decide if the proposed project will
be implemented. I will document the
decision and reasons for the decision in
the Record of Decision.
Range of Alternatives
The Forest Service will consider a
range of alternatives. One of these will
be the ‘‘no action’’ alternative in which
none of the proposed activities will be
implemented. Additional alternatives
will examine varying levels and
locations for the proposed activities to
achieve the proposal’s purposes, as well
as to respond to the issues and other
resource values.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The nature of the decision to be made
is to select an action that meets the legal
rights of the proponent, while protecting
the environment in compliance with
applicable laws, regulations and policy.
The District Ranger will use the EIS
process to develop the necessary
information to make an informed
decision as required by 36 CFR 228
Subpart A. Based on the alternatives
developed in the EIS, the following are
possible decisions:
(1) An approval of the Plan of
Operations as submitted;
(2) An approval of the Plan of
Operations with changes, and the
incorporation of mitigations and
stipulations that meet the mandates of
applicable laws, regulations, and policy;
(3) Denial of the Plan of Operations if
no alternative can be developed that is
in compliance with applicable laws,
regulations and policy.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43401
Permits or Licenses Required
Various permits and licenses are
needed prior to implementation of this
project. Permits or licenses required by
the issuing agencies identified for this
proposal are:
• Approval of Plan of Operations
from the Kootenai National Forest
• Exploration License from the
Montana Department of Environmental
Quality
Public Involvement and Scoping: This
Notice of Intent initiates the scoping
process, which guides the development
of the EIS. At this stage of the planning
process, site-specific public comments
are being requested to determine the
scope of the analysis, and identify
significant issues and alternatives to the
Proposed Action. Comments concerning
the proposed action must be postmarked
by August 25, 2008, to be considered in
the draft EIS. The public is encouraged
to take part in the process and to visit
with Forest Service officials at any time
during the analysis and prior to the
decision. The Forest Service will be
seeking information, comments, and
assistance from Federal, State, and local
agencies, Tribal governments, and other
individuals or organizations that may be
interested in, or affected by, the
proposed action. This input will be used
in preparation of the draft and final EIS.
The scoping process will include:
1. Identifying potential issues.
2. Identifying major issues to be
analyzed in depth.
3. Identifying alternatives to the
proposed action.
4. Exploring additional alternatives
that will be derived from issues
recognized during scoping activities.
5. Identifying potential environmental
effects of this proposal (i.e. direct,
indirect, and cumulative effects and
connected actions).
Estimated Dates for Filing: The draft
EIS is expected to be filed with the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
and to be available for public review in
December 2008. At that time EPA will
publish a Notice of Availability of the
draft EIS in the Federal Register. The
comment period on the draft EIS will be
45 days from the date the EPA publishes
the Notice of Availability in the Federal
Register. It is very important that those
interested in the management of this
area participate at that time.
The final EIS is scheduled to be
completed in February 2009. In the final
EIS, the Forest Service is required to
respond to comments and responses
received during the comment period
that pertain to the environmental
consequences discussed in the draft EIS
and to applicable laws, regulations, and
E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM
25JYN1
43402
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 144 / Friday, July 25, 2008 / Notices
policies considered in making a
decision regarding the proposal.
Reviewer’s Obligations: The Forest
Service believes it is important to give
reviewers notice of several court rulings
related to public participation in the
environmental review process. First,
reviewers of draft environmental impact
statements must structure their
participation in the environmental
review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the
reviewer’s position and contentions.
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v.
NIRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). Also,
environmental objections that could be
raised at the draft environmental impact
statement stage may be waived or
dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon
v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir.
1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v.
Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D.
Wis. 1980). Because of these court
rulings, it is very important that those
interested in this proposed action
participate by the close of the 45 day
comment period so that substantive
comments and objections are made
available to the Forest Service at a time
when it can meaningfully consider and
respond to them in the final EIS.
To be most helpful, comments on the
draft EIS should be as specific as
possible and may address the adequacy
of the statement or the merit of the
alternatives discussed. Reviewers may
wish to refer to the Council on
Environmental Quality regulations for
implementing the procedural provisions
of the National Environmental Policy
Act at 40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing
these points.
Comments received, including the
names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the
public cord on this proposal, and will
be available for public inspection.
Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22;
Forest Service Handbook 1909.15, Section
21.
Dated: July 18, 2008.
Mike Herrin,
District Ranger, Three Rivers Ranger District,
Kootenai National Forest.
[FR Doc. E8–17063 Filed 7–24–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Forest Service
Forest Service Manual 2360 for
Heritage Program Management
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of availability of final
directive.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:15 Jul 24, 2008
Jkt 214001
SUMMARY: The Forest Service is issuing
a new directive to Forest Service
Manual 2360 for Heritage Program
Management. The Forest Service
Manual for the Heritage Program was
last amended in 1991. The new
directive addresses laws, amendments,
and Executive orders passed since 1991
and issues that are increasingly
important to the Forest Service Heritage
Program including increased Tribal
coordination on a variety of issues from
re-burial of human remains to tourism,
growth of educational travel and
heritage tourism, emphasis on use of
historic properites, and increased theft
of American antiquities.
The directive provides Heritage
Program guidance to Forest Service land
managers. It does not change
management direction, but rather
clarifies responsibilities, authorities,
and internal procedures to improve the
management and protection of cultural
resources on National Forest System
lands.
DATES: This directive is effective July
25, 2008.
ADDRESSES: The directive is available at
https://www.fs.fed.us/cgi-bin/Directives/
get_dirs/fsm?2300!. Single paper copies
of the directive are also available by
contacting April Thorne, Recreation and
Heritage Resources (Mail Stop 1125),
Forest Service, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, 1400 Independence Ave.,
SW., Washington, DC 20250, telephone
202–205–3562.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Kaczor, Federal Preservation
Officer, Forest Service, U.S. Department
of Agriculture, 201 14th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20250, e-mail:
mkaczor@fs.fed.us, telephone 202–205–
1427.
Individuals who use
telecommunication devices for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern
Standard Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
addition to legislation and regulation
passed prior to 1991, this directive
incorporates laws, regulations, and
Executive orders passed since 1991 that
affect Heritage Program management,
including:
1992—Amendments to the National
Historic Preservation Act (NHPA).
2000—E.O. 13175—Consultation with
Indian Tribal Governments.
2003—43 CFR 10—Native American
Graves and Repatriation Regulations.
2003—E.O. 13287—Preserve America
2004—Amendments to the 36 CFR
800 regulations implementing the
National Historic Preservation Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2004—E.O. 13327—Federal Real
Property Asset Management.
2004—Federal Lands Recreation
Enhancement Act.
2005—Forest Service Facility
Realignment and Enhancement Act.
Goals of FSM 2360—Heritage Program
Management
The goals of the updated direction in
Forest Service Manual 2360 are to:
1. Improve cultural resource
stewardship on National Forest System
lands.
2. Establish consistent Heritage
program implementation across Forest
Service units.
3. Increase efficiency in Heritage
Program support to other Forest Service
programs.
4. Improve and expand Forest Service
partnerships with the public and with
Indian tribal communities in the interest
of historic preservation.
5. Improve and expand the delivery of
Heritage programs and products to the
American public.
FSM 2360 Sections
2361—Consultation and Coordination
describes consultation and coordination
with State, Tribal, and local
governments, other Federal agencies,
and the public in all facets of Heritage
Program management.
2362—Planning includes guidance on
the integration of heritage issues in
agency planning efforts and
development of management plans for
the Heritage Program and for individual
historic properties.
2363—Identification, Evaluation, and
Allocation to Management Categories
describes the process to identify cultural
resources that are eligible for listing on
the National Register of Historic Places
and recommend management that
protects the value of cultural resources
and maximizes their benefit to the
agency and the public.
2364—Protection and Stewardship
describes requirements to protect
cultural resources from environmental
damage, effects of agency or agencyauthorized undertakings, and illegal
activity or unauthorized use. It provides
guidance on conservation, study, and
formal designations of historic
properties.
2365—Public Education and Outreach
provides guidelines for the delivery of
heritage values to the public through the
Forest Service Windows on the Past
program.
2366—Management of Heritage
Collections describes types of
collections and curation standards.
2367—Permits, Agreements, and
Contracts provides guidance for the
E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM
25JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 144 (Friday, July 25, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43400-43402]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-17063]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Genesis Inc. 2009 Exploration Drilling Project; Kootenai National
Forest, Lincoln County, MT
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Kootenai
National Forest will prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) to
document the analysis and disclose the environmental impacts of the
proposed action to conduct a helicopter-assisted exploration drilling
project near Troy, Montana. Genesis, Inc. submitted a
[[Page 43401]]
proposed Plan of Operations on June 19, 2008, pursuant to Forest
Service locatable mineral regulations 36 CFR 228, Subpart A. A single
EIS, evaluating all components of the proposed project will be
prepared.
Scoping Comment Date: Comments concerning the proposed action must
be postmarked by August 25, 2008, to be considered in the draft EIS.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments concerning the Proposed Action to Mike
Herrin, Three Rivers District Ranger, Genesis Exploration Project,
Kootenai National Forest, 12858 U.S. Hwy. 2, Troy, MT 59935, or e-mail
your comments to: comments-northern-kootenai-threerivers@fs.fed.us. All
comments received must contain: Name of commenter, postal service
mailing address, and date of comment. Comments sent as an e-mail
message should be sent as an attachment to the message. A copy on
computer-generated disc should accompany all comments over one page in
length.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dick Harlow, Project Coordinator,
Three River Ranger Station, 12858 U.S. Hwy. 2, Troy, Montana 59935.
Phone (406) 293-7773, or e-mail at dharlow@fs.fed.us.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Proposed Action
The Three Rivers District Ranger of the Kootenai National Forest
has received a plan of operations proposing to access three (3)
helicopter-supported drill sites on NFS lands in sections 7, 17, & 18,
T28N, R33W, MT. P.M., southwest of Bull Lake, in Lincoln and Sanders
Counties. These sites were previously drilled in 1999 and this
additional exploration drilling is needed to further define ore
reserves on the unpatented mining claims. The proposal is to drill 8
core holes from 3 separate locations, utilizing existing openings from
previous helicopter drill sites. The holes will vary from 100' to 1600'
in depth.
The Drilling Plan for the drill sites is to use a pre-constructed
metal landing/drill platform (approx. 30' long x 15' wide). The
platform will be flown to the sites in sections and assembled. The
drill will be mounted on the drill platforms on the south side of Ross
Creek.
A helicopter staging site will be located near the junction of FR
4628 and FR 4628A. Some site maintenance will be required. This work
will include removal of brush and short trees.
Design features and mitigations to maintain and protect resource
values would be included.
The proposed implementation period would be June 16, 2009, through
November 15, 2009.
Lead and Cooperating Agencies
Montana Department of Environmental Quality, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation,
Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes, and Kootenai Tribe of Idaho,
have either jurisdiction or interest and will participate as
cooperating agencies or government entities in the preparation of this
EIS. Other governmental agencies and any public that may be interested
in or affected by the proposal are invited to participate in the
scoping process, which is designed to obtain input and to identify
potential issues relating to the proposed project.
Responsible Official
As the District Ranger of the Three Rivers Ranger District,
Kootenai National Forest, I am the Responsible Official. As the
Responsible Official, I will decide if the proposed project will be
implemented. I will document the decision and reasons for the decision
in the Record of Decision.
Range of Alternatives
The Forest Service will consider a range of alternatives. One of
these will be the ``no action'' alternative in which none of the
proposed activities will be implemented. Additional alternatives will
examine varying levels and locations for the proposed activities to
achieve the proposal's purposes, as well as to respond to the issues
and other resource values.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The nature of the decision to be made is to select an action that
meets the legal rights of the proponent, while protecting the
environment in compliance with applicable laws, regulations and policy.
The District Ranger will use the EIS process to develop the necessary
information to make an informed decision as required by 36 CFR 228
Subpart A. Based on the alternatives developed in the EIS, the
following are possible decisions:
(1) An approval of the Plan of Operations as submitted;
(2) An approval of the Plan of Operations with changes, and the
incorporation of mitigations and stipulations that meet the mandates of
applicable laws, regulations, and policy;
(3) Denial of the Plan of Operations if no alternative can be
developed that is in compliance with applicable laws, regulations and
policy.
Permits or Licenses Required
Various permits and licenses are needed prior to implementation of
this project. Permits or licenses required by the issuing agencies
identified for this proposal are:
Approval of Plan of Operations from the Kootenai National
Forest
Exploration License from the Montana Department of
Environmental Quality
Public Involvement and Scoping: This Notice of Intent initiates the
scoping process, which guides the development of the EIS. At this stage
of the planning process, site-specific public comments are being
requested to determine the scope of the analysis, and identify
significant issues and alternatives to the Proposed Action. Comments
concerning the proposed action must be postmarked by August 25, 2008,
to be considered in the draft EIS. The public is encouraged to take
part in the process and to visit with Forest Service officials at any
time during the analysis and prior to the decision. The Forest Service
will be seeking information, comments, and assistance from Federal,
State, and local agencies, Tribal governments, and other individuals or
organizations that may be interested in, or affected by, the proposed
action. This input will be used in preparation of the draft and final
EIS. The scoping process will include:
1. Identifying potential issues.
2. Identifying major issues to be analyzed in depth.
3. Identifying alternatives to the proposed action.
4. Exploring additional alternatives that will be derived from
issues recognized during scoping activities.
5. Identifying potential environmental effects of this proposal
(i.e. direct, indirect, and cumulative effects and connected actions).
Estimated Dates for Filing: The draft EIS is expected to be filed
with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and to be available for
public review in December 2008. At that time EPA will publish a Notice
of Availability of the draft EIS in the Federal Register. The comment
period on the draft EIS will be 45 days from the date the EPA publishes
the Notice of Availability in the Federal Register. It is very
important that those interested in the management of this area
participate at that time.
The final EIS is scheduled to be completed in February 2009. In the
final EIS, the Forest Service is required to respond to comments and
responses received during the comment period that pertain to the
environmental consequences discussed in the draft EIS and to applicable
laws, regulations, and
[[Page 43402]]
policies considered in making a decision regarding the proposal.
Reviewer's Obligations: The Forest Service believes it is important
to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public
participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of
draft environmental impact statements must structure their
participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewer's position and
contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NIRDC, 435 U.S. 519,
553 (1978). Also, environmental objections that could be raised at the
draft environmental impact statement stage may be waived or dismissed
by the courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir.
1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338
(E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of these court rulings, it is very important
that those interested in this proposed action participate by the close
of the 45 day comment period so that substantive comments and
objections are made available to the Forest Service at a time when it
can meaningfully consider and respond to them in the final EIS.
To be most helpful, comments on the draft EIS should be as specific
as possible and may address the adequacy of the statement or the merit
of the alternatives discussed. Reviewers may wish to refer to the
Council on Environmental Quality regulations for implementing the
procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at 40
CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Comments received, including the names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the public cord on this proposal,
and will be available for public inspection.
Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22; Forest Service Handbook
1909.15, Section 21.
Dated: July 18, 2008.
Mike Herrin,
District Ranger, Three Rivers Ranger District, Kootenai National
Forest.
[FR Doc. E8-17063 Filed 7-24-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M