Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Extension, 43235-43237 [E8-16898]
Download as PDF
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 143 / Thursday, July 24, 2008 / Notices
statement of intent not to participate in
Auction 85 bidding, including a request
to dismiss an application outside the
settlement period, could also violate the
rule.
41. The Bureaus also remind
applicants with engineering proposals
filed in the digital companion channel
window that are mutually exclusive that
they must not communicate indirectly
about bids or bidding strategy.
Accordingly, such applicants are
encouraged not to use the same
individual as an authorized bidder. A
violation of the anti-collusion rule could
occur if an individual acts as the
authorized bidder for two or more
competing applicants, and conveys
information concerning the substance of
bids or bidding strategies between such
applicants. Also, if the authorized
bidders are different individuals
employed by the same organization, a
violation similarly could occur. A
violation of the anti-collusion rule could
occur in other contexts, such as an
individual serving as an officer for two
or more applicants.
42. Applicants are reminded also that,
regardless of compliance with the
Commission’s rules, they remain subject
to the antitrust laws, which are designed
to prevent anticompetitive behavior in
the marketplace. Compliance with the
disclosure requirements of the
Commission’s anti-collusion rule will
not insulate a party from enforcement of
the antitrust laws.
43. In addition, 47 CFR 1.65 requires
an applicant to maintain the accuracy
and completeness of information
furnished in its pending application and
to notify the Commission within 30
days of any substantial change that may
be of decisional significance to that
application. Thus, 47 CFR 1.65 requires
an auction applicant to notify the
Commission of any substantial change
to the information or certifications
included in its pending short-form
application. Applicants are therefore
required by 47 CFR 1.65 to make such
notification to the Commission
immediately upon discovery.
44. Moreover, 47 CFR 1.2105(c)(6)
requires that any applicant that makes
or receives a communication prohibited
by Section 1.2105(c) must report such
communication to the Commission in
writing immediately, and in no case
later than five business after the
communication occurs. Each applicant’s
obligation to report any such
communication continues beyond the
five-day period after the communication
is made, even if the report is not made
within the five-day period.
45. Any report of a communication
pursuant to 47 CFR 1.65 or 1.2105(c)(6)
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Jul 23, 2008
Jkt 214001
must be submitted by electronic mail to
the following address:
auction85@fcc.gov. The electronic mail
report must include a subject or caption
referring to Auction 85 and the name of
the applicant.
46. Parties reporting communications
pursuant to 47 CFR 1.2105(a)(2) or
1.2105(c)(6) must take care to ensure
that any such reports of prohibited
communications do not themselves give
rise to a violation of the anti-collusion
rule. For example, a party’s report of a
prohibited communication could violate
the rule by communicating prohibited
information to other applicants through
the use of Commission filing procedures
that would allow such materials to be
made available for public inspection. A
party seeking to report such prohibited
communications should consider
submitting its report with a request that
the report or portions of the submission
be withheld from public inspection
pursuant to 47 CFR 0.459. Such parties
are also encouraged to coordinate with
the Auctions and Spectrum Access
Division staff if they have any questions
about the procedures for submitting
such reports.
Federal Communications Commission.
Gary D. Michaels,
Deputy Chief, Auctions and Spectrum Access
Division, WTB.
[FR Doc. E8–16964 Filed 7–23–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Extension
Federal Trade Commission
(‘‘Commission’’ or ‘‘FTC’’).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The information collection
requirements described below will be
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) for review, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act (‘‘PRA’’). The FTC is seeking public
comments on its proposal to extend
through October 31, 2011, the current
PRA clearance for information
collection requirements contained in the
FTC rule on ‘‘Labeling and Advertising
of Home Insulation’’ (‘‘R-value Rule’’ or
‘‘Rule’’). The current clearance expires
on October 31, 2008.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before September 22, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties are
invited to submit written comments.
Comments should refer to ‘‘16 CFR Part
460: Paperwork Comment, FTC File No.
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43235
R811001’’ to facilitate the organization
of comments. A comment filed in paper
form should include this reference both
in the text and on the envelope and
should be mailed or delivered to the
following address: Federal Trade
Commission, Room H–135 (Annex J),
600 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.,
Washington, D.C. 20580. The
Commission is requesting that any
comment filed in paper form be sent by
courier or overnight service, if possible
because U.S. postal mail in the
Washington area and at the FTC is
subject to delay due to heightened
security precautions. Moreover, because
paper mail in the Washington area and
at the FTC is subject to delay, please
consider submitting your comments in
electronic form, as prescribed below. If,
however, the comment contains any
material for which confidential
treatment is requested, it must be filed
in paper form, and the first page of the
document must be clearly labeled
‘‘Confidential.’’1
Comments filed in electronic form
should be submitted by following the
instructions on the web-based form at
(https://secure.commentworks.com/ftcrvaluePRA) and following the
instructions on the web-based form. To
ensure that the Commission considers
an electronic comment, you must file it
on the web-based form at: (https://
secure.commentworks.com/ftcrvaluePRA). If this notice appears at
www.regulations.gov, you may also file
an electronic comment through that
website. The Commission will consider
all comments that www.regulations.gov
forwards to it.
The FTC Act and other laws the
Commission administers permit the
collection of public comments to
consider and use in this proceeding as
appropriate. All timely and responsive
public comments will be considered by
the Commission and will be available to
the public on the FTC website, to the
extent practicable, at www.ftc.gov. As a
matter of discretion, the FTC makes
every effort to remove home contact
information for individuals from the
public comments it receives before
placing those comments on the FTC
website. More information, including
routine uses permitted by the Privacy
Act, may be found in the FTC’s privacy
1 Commission Rule 4.2(d), 16 CFR 4.2(d). The
comment must be accompanied by an explicit
request for confidential treatment, including the
factual and legal basis for the request, and must
identify the specific portions of the comment to be
withheld from the public record. The request will
be granted or denied by the Commission’s General
Counsel, consistent with applicable law and the
public interest. See Commission Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR
4.9(c).
E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM
24JYN1
43236
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 143 / Thursday, July 24, 2008 / Notices
policy at (https://www.ftc.gov/ftc/
privacy.shtm).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Hampton Newsome, Attorney, Bureau of
Consumer Protection, (202) 326–2889,
Federal Trade Commission, 600
Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.,
Washington D.C. 20580.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3501–3521, federal
agencies must obtain approval from
OMB for each collection of information
they conduct or sponsor. ‘‘Collection of
information’’ means agency requests or
requirements that members of the public
submit reports, keep records, or provide
information to a third party. 44 U.S.C.
3502(3), 5 CFR 1320.3(c). As required by
section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, the
FTC is providing this opportunity for
public comment before requesting that
OMB extend the existing PRA clearance
for the R-value Rule, 16 CFR Part 460
(OMB Control Number 3084-0109).
The FTC invites comments on: (1)
whether the proposed collection of
information required by the Rule is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (2) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (4) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
The R-value Rule establishes uniform
standards for the substantiation and
disclosure of accurate, material product
information about the thermal
performance characteristics of home
insulation products. The R-value of an
insulation signifies the insulation’s
degree of resistance to the flow of heat.
This information tells consumers how
well a product is likely to perform as an
insulator and allows consumers to
determine whether the cost of the
insulation is justified.
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with NOTICES
Estimated annual hours burden:
117,000 hours, rounded
The Rule’s requirements include
product testing, recordkeeping, and
third-party disclosures on labels, fact
sheets, advertisements, and other
promotional materials. Based on
information provided by members of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Jul 23, 2008
Jkt 214001
insulation industry, staff estimates that
the Rule affects: (1) 150 insulation
manufacturers and their testing
laboratories; (2) 1,615 installers who sell
home insulation; (3) 125,000 new home
builders/sellers of site-built homes and
approximately 5,500 dealers who sell
manufactured housing; and (4) 25,000
retail sellers who sell home insulation
for installation by consumers.
Under the Rule’s testing requirements,
manufacturers must test each insulation
product for its R-value. Based on past
industry input, staff estimates that the
test takes approximately 2 hours.
Approximately 15 of the 150 insulation
manufacturers in existence introduce
one new product each year. Their total
annual testing burden is therefore
approximately 30 hours.
Staff further estimates that most
manufacturers require an average of
approximately 20 hours per year
regarding third-party disclosure
requirements in advertising and other
promotional materials. Only the five or
six largest manufacturers require
additional time, approximately 80 hours
each. Thus, the annual third-party
disclosure burden for manufacturers is
approximately 3,360 hours [(144
manufacturers x 20 hours) + (6
manufacturers x 80 hours)].
While the Rule imposes
recordkeeping requirements, most
manufacturers and their testing
laboratories keep their testing-related
records in the ordinary course of
business. Staff estimates that no more
than one additional hour per year per
manufacturer is necessary to comply
with this requirement, for an annual
recordkeeping burden of approximately
150 hours (150 manufacturers x 1 hour).
Installers are required to show the
manufacturers’ insulation fact sheet to
retail consumers before purchase. They
must also disclose information in
contracts or receipts concerning the Rvalue and the amount of insulation to
install. Staff estimates that two minutes
per sales transaction is sufficient to
comply with these requirements.
Approximately 1,520,000 retrofit
insulations (an industry source’s
estimate) are installed by approximately
1,615 installers per year, and, thus, the
related annual burden total is
approximately 50,667 hours (1,520,000
sales transactions x 2 minutes). Staff
anticipates that one hour per year per
installer is sufficient to cover required
disclosures in advertisements and other
promotional materials. Thus, the burden
for this requirement is approximately
1,615 hours per year. In addition,
installers must keep records that
indicate the substantiation relied upon
for savings claims. The additional time
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
to comply with this requirement is
minimal — approximately 5 minutes
per year per installer — for a total of
approximately 135 hours.
New home sellers must make contract
disclosures concerning the type,
thickness, and R-value of the insulation
they install in each part of a new home.
Staff estimates that no more than 30
seconds per sales transaction is required
to comply with this requirement, for a
total annual burden of approximately
10,833 hours (an estimated 1.3 million
new home sales2 x 30 seconds). New
home sellers who make energy savings
claims must also keep records regarding
the substantiation relied upon for those
claims. Because few new home sellers
make these claims, and the ones that do
would likely keep these records
regardless of the R-value Rule, staff
believes that the 30 seconds covering
disclosures would also encompass this
recordkeeping element.
The Rule requires that the
approximately 25,000 retailers who sell
home insulation make fact sheets
available to consumers before purchase.
This can be accomplished by, for
example, placing copies in a display
rack or keeping copies in a binder on a
service desk with an appropriate notice.
Replenishing or replacing fact sheets
should require no more than
approximately one hour per year per
retailer, for a total of 25,000 annual
hours, industry-wide.
The Rule also requires specific
disclosures in advertisements or other
promotional materials to ensure that the
claims are fair and not deceptive. This
burden is very minimal because retailers
typically use advertising copy provided
by the insulation manufacturer, and
even when retailers prepare their own
advertising copy, the Rule provides
some of the language to be used.
Accordingly, approximately one hour
per year per retailer should suffice to
meet this requirement, for a total annual
burden of approximately 25,000 hours.
Retailers who make energy savings
claims in advertisements or other
promotional materials must keep
records that indicate the substantiation
they are relying upon. Because few
retailers make these types of
promotional claims and because the
Rule permits retailers to rely on the
insulation manufacturer’s substantiation
data for any claims that are made, the
additional recordkeeping burden is de
minimis. The time calculated for
2 Based on U.S. census data from 2007. See
(https://www.census.gov/const/www/
quarterly_starts_completions.pdf.) Figures for new
housing starts show a continuing decline from
2005, when the Commission last sought PRA
clearance for the Rule, through 2007. See id.
E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM
24JYN1
43237
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 143 / Thursday, July 24, 2008 / Notices
disclosures, above, would be more than
adequate to cover any burden imposed
by this recordkeeping requirement.
To summarize, staff estimates that the
Rule imposes a total of 116,790 burden
hours, as follows: 150 recordkeeping
and 3,390 testing and disclosure hours
for manufacturers; 135 recordkeeping
and 52,282 disclosure hours for
installers; 10,833 disclosure hours for
new home sellers; and 50,000 disclosure
hours for retailers. Rounded to the
nearest thousand, the total burden is
117,000 burden hours.
Estimated annual cost burden:
$2,650,000, rounded to the nearest
thousand (solely related to labor costs)
The total annual labor cost for the
Rule’s information collection
requirements is $2,649,720, derived as
follows: $690 for testing, based on 30
hours for manufacturers (30 hours x $23
per hour for skilled technical
personnel); $3,705 for manufacturers’
and installers’ compliance with the
Rule’s recordkeeping requirements,
based on 285 hours (285 hours x $13 per
hour for clerical personnel); $43,680 for
manufacturers’ compliance with thirdparty disclosure requirements, based on
3,360 hours (3,360 hours x $13 per hour
for clerical personnel); and $2,601,645
for disclosure compliance by installers,
new home sellers, and retailers (113,115
hours x $23 per hour for sales persons).
There are no significant current
capital or other non-labor costs
associated with this Rule. Because the
Rule has been in effect since 1980,
members of the industry are familiar
with its requirements and already have
in place the equipment for conducting
tests and storing records. New products
are introduced infrequently. Because the
required disclosures are placed on
packaging or on the product itself, the
Rule’s additional disclosure
requirements do not cause industry
to the OS Paperwork Clearance Officer
at the above e-mail address within 60
days.
Proposed Project: Evaluating
Institutions Research Misconduct
Education Efforts—OMB No. 0990–
NEW–Office of Research Integrity.
Abstract: The Office of Research
Integrity (ORI) is conducting this study
of Research Misconduct Education in
medical schools because these
institutions are responsible for
dissemination of information and
guidelines to their faculty, staff, and
students concerning the U.S. Public
Health Service (PHS) Policies on
Research Misconduct (42 CFR Part 93).
The ORI review of institutional research
misconduct policies, investigation
reports, requests for technical assistance
in handling allegations, and analyses of
filings of the Annual Report on Possible
Research Misconduct (PHS 6349) have
raised questions about the level of
knowledge that medical school faculty
conducting research and responding to
allegations, and the faculty’s perception
of their institution’s commitment to
dealing with research misconduct. This
study is designed to evaluate the
knowledge of medical school faculty
members about their institution’s
policies and procedures, identify best
practices and approaches used by
medical institutions, which account for
the most positive perceptions of
commitment and the best understanding
of research misconduct. Also, the study
will identify the areas of responsibility
and specify the activities that
institutions perform in the process of
educating their employees to the
meaning of scientific misconduct at
their institutions.
This will involve a one-time data
collection effort. These researchers have
been identified from a list of medical
school principal investigators (PIs) that
we obtained from the National Institutes
of Health (NIH). All received NIH
research projects awards in 2005 or
2006.
members to incur any significant
additional non-labor associated costs.
William Blumenthal
General Counsel
[FR Doc. E8–16898 Filed 7–23–08: 8:45 am]
Billing Code: 6750–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
[Document Identifier: OS–0990–New]
Agency Information Collection
Request 60-Day Public Comment
Request
Office of the Secretary, HHS.
In compliance with the requirement
of section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Office of the Secretary (OS), Department
of Health and Human Services, is
publishing the following summary of a
proposed information collection request
for public comment. Interested persons
are invited to send comments regarding
this burden estimate or any other aspect
of this collection of information,
including any of the following subjects:
(1) The necessity and utility of the
proposed information collection for the
proper performance of the agency’s
functions; (2) the accuracy of the
estimated burden; (3) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (4) the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology to minimize the information
collection burden. To obtain copies of
the supporting statement and any
related forms for the proposed
paperwork collections referenced above,
e-mail your request, including your
address, phone number, OMB number,
and OS document identifier, to
Sherette.funncoleman@hhs.gov, or call
the Reports Clearance Office on (202)
690–6162. Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collections must be directed
AGENCY:
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Type of respondent
Recruit Letters ...................................
Web Survey ......................................
Average burden hours per
response
10,754
10,754
1
1
15/60
20/60
896
3,585
........................
........................
........................
4,481
Researchers .....................................
Researchers .....................................
Total ...........................................
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with NOTICES
Number of
responses per
respondent
Number of
respondents
Forms
...........................................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Jul 23, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM
24JYN1
Total burden
hours
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 143 (Thursday, July 24, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43235-43237]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-16898]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Extension
AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission (``Commission'' or ``FTC'').
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The information collection requirements described below will
be submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (``OMB'') for
review, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (``PRA''). The FTC
is seeking public comments on its proposal to extend through October
31, 2011, the current PRA clearance for information collection
requirements contained in the FTC rule on ``Labeling and Advertising of
Home Insulation'' (``R-value Rule'' or ``Rule''). The current clearance
expires on October 31, 2008.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before September 22, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties are invited to submit written comments.
Comments should refer to ``16 CFR Part 460: Paperwork Comment, FTC File
No. R811001'' to facilitate the organization of comments. A comment
filed in paper form should include this reference both in the text and
on the envelope and should be mailed or delivered to the following
address: Federal Trade Commission, Room H-135 (Annex J), 600
Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580. The Commission is
requesting that any comment filed in paper form be sent by courier or
overnight service, if possible because U.S. postal mail in the
Washington area and at the FTC is subject to delay due to heightened
security precautions. Moreover, because paper mail in the Washington
area and at the FTC is subject to delay, please consider submitting
your comments in electronic form, as prescribed below. If, however, the
comment contains any material for which confidential treatment is
requested, it must be filed in paper form, and the first page of the
document must be clearly labeled ``Confidential.''\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Commission Rule 4.2(d), 16 CFR 4.2(d). The comment must be
accompanied by an explicit request for confidential treatment,
including the factual and legal basis for the request, and must
identify the specific portions of the comment to be withheld from
the public record. The request will be granted or denied by the
Commission's General Counsel, consistent with applicable law and the
public interest. See Commission Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments filed in electronic form should be submitted by following
the instructions on the web-based form at (https://
secure.commentworks.com/ftc-rvaluePRA) and following the instructions
on the web-based form. To ensure that the Commission considers an
electronic comment, you must file it on the web-based form at: (https:/
/secure.commentworks.com/ftc-rvaluePRA). If this notice appears at
www.regulations.gov, you may also file an electronic comment through
that website. The Commission will consider all comments that
www.regulations.gov forwards to it.
The FTC Act and other laws the Commission administers permit the
collection of public comments to consider and use in this proceeding as
appropriate. All timely and responsive public comments will be
considered by the Commission and will be available to the public on the
FTC website, to the extent practicable, at www.ftc.gov. As a matter of
discretion, the FTC makes every effort to remove home contact
information for individuals from the public comments it receives before
placing those comments on the FTC website. More information, including
routine uses permitted by the Privacy Act, may be found in the FTC's
privacy
[[Page 43236]]
policy at (https://www.ftc.gov/ftc/privacy.shtm).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hampton Newsome, Attorney, Bureau of
Consumer Protection, (202) 326-2889, Federal Trade Commission, 600
Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington D.C. 20580.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3501-3521, federal
agencies must obtain approval from OMB for each collection of
information they conduct or sponsor. ``Collection of information''
means agency requests or requirements that members of the public submit
reports, keep records, or provide information to a third party. 44
U.S.C. 3502(3), 5 CFR 1320.3(c). As required by section 3506(c)(2)(A)
of the PRA, the FTC is providing this opportunity for public comment
before requesting that OMB extend the existing PRA clearance for the R-
value Rule, 16 CFR Part 460 (OMB Control Number 3084-0109).
The FTC invites comments on: (1) whether the proposed collection of
information required by the Rule is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of the
agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions
used; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses.
The R-value Rule establishes uniform standards for the
substantiation and disclosure of accurate, material product information
about the thermal performance characteristics of home insulation
products. The R-value of an insulation signifies the insulation's
degree of resistance to the flow of heat. This information tells
consumers how well a product is likely to perform as an insulator and
allows consumers to determine whether the cost of the insulation is
justified.
Estimated annual hours burden: 117,000 hours, rounded
The Rule's requirements include product testing, recordkeeping, and
third-party disclosures on labels, fact sheets, advertisements, and
other promotional materials. Based on information provided by members
of the insulation industry, staff estimates that the Rule affects: (1)
150 insulation manufacturers and their testing laboratories; (2) 1,615
installers who sell home insulation; (3) 125,000 new home builders/
sellers of site-built homes and approximately 5,500 dealers who sell
manufactured housing; and (4) 25,000 retail sellers who sell home
insulation for installation by consumers.
Under the Rule's testing requirements, manufacturers must test each
insulation product for its R-value. Based on past industry input, staff
estimates that the test takes approximately 2 hours. Approximately 15
of the 150 insulation manufacturers in existence introduce one new
product each year. Their total annual testing burden is therefore
approximately 30 hours.
Staff further estimates that most manufacturers require an average
of approximately 20 hours per year regarding third-party disclosure
requirements in advertising and other promotional materials. Only the
five or six largest manufacturers require additional time,
approximately 80 hours each. Thus, the annual third-party disclosure
burden for manufacturers is approximately 3,360 hours [(144
manufacturers x 20 hours) + (6 manufacturers x 80 hours)].
While the Rule imposes recordkeeping requirements, most
manufacturers and their testing laboratories keep their testing-related
records in the ordinary course of business. Staff estimates that no
more than one additional hour per year per manufacturer is necessary to
comply with this requirement, for an annual recordkeeping burden of
approximately 150 hours (150 manufacturers x 1 hour).
Installers are required to show the manufacturers' insulation fact
sheet to retail consumers before purchase. They must also disclose
information in contracts or receipts concerning the R-value and the
amount of insulation to install. Staff estimates that two minutes per
sales transaction is sufficient to comply with these requirements.
Approximately 1,520,000 retrofit insulations (an industry source's
estimate) are installed by approximately 1,615 installers per year,
and, thus, the related annual burden total is approximately 50,667
hours (1,520,000 sales transactions x 2 minutes). Staff anticipates
that one hour per year per installer is sufficient to cover required
disclosures in advertisements and other promotional materials. Thus,
the burden for this requirement is approximately 1,615 hours per year.
In addition, installers must keep records that indicate the
substantiation relied upon for savings claims. The additional time to
comply with this requirement is minimal -- approximately 5 minutes per
year per installer -- for a total of approximately 135 hours.
New home sellers must make contract disclosures concerning the
type, thickness, and R-value of the insulation they install in each
part of a new home. Staff estimates that no more than 30 seconds per
sales transaction is required to comply with this requirement, for a
total annual burden of approximately 10,833 hours (an estimated 1.3
million new home sales\2\ x 30 seconds). New home sellers who make
energy savings claims must also keep records regarding the
substantiation relied upon for those claims. Because few new home
sellers make these claims, and the ones that do would likely keep these
records regardless of the R-value Rule, staff believes that the 30
seconds covering disclosures would also encompass this recordkeeping
element.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Based on U.S. census data from 2007. See (https://
www.census.gov/const/www/quarterly_starts_completions.pdf.)
Figures for new housing starts show a continuing decline from 2005,
when the Commission last sought PRA clearance for the Rule, through
2007. See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Rule requires that the approximately 25,000 retailers who sell
home insulation make fact sheets available to consumers before
purchase. This can be accomplished by, for example, placing copies in a
display rack or keeping copies in a binder on a service desk with an
appropriate notice. Replenishing or replacing fact sheets should
require no more than approximately one hour per year per retailer, for
a total of 25,000 annual hours, industry-wide.
The Rule also requires specific disclosures in advertisements or
other promotional materials to ensure that the claims are fair and not
deceptive. This burden is very minimal because retailers typically use
advertising copy provided by the insulation manufacturer, and even when
retailers prepare their own advertising copy, the Rule provides some of
the language to be used. Accordingly, approximately one hour per year
per retailer should suffice to meet this requirement, for a total
annual burden of approximately 25,000 hours.
Retailers who make energy savings claims in advertisements or other
promotional materials must keep records that indicate the
substantiation they are relying upon. Because few retailers make these
types of promotional claims and because the Rule permits retailers to
rely on the insulation manufacturer's substantiation data for any
claims that are made, the additional recordkeeping burden is de
minimis. The time calculated for
[[Page 43237]]
disclosures, above, would be more than adequate to cover any burden
imposed by this recordkeeping requirement.
To summarize, staff estimates that the Rule imposes a total of
116,790 burden hours, as follows: 150 recordkeeping and 3,390 testing
and disclosure hours for manufacturers; 135 recordkeeping and 52,282
disclosure hours for installers; 10,833 disclosure hours for new home
sellers; and 50,000 disclosure hours for retailers. Rounded to the
nearest thousand, the total burden is 117,000 burden hours.
Estimated annual cost burden: $2,650,000, rounded to the nearest
thousand (solely related to labor costs)
The total annual labor cost for the Rule's information collection
requirements is $2,649,720, derived as follows: $690 for testing, based
on 30 hours for manufacturers (30 hours x $23 per hour for skilled
technical personnel); $3,705 for manufacturers' and installers'
compliance with the Rule's recordkeeping requirements, based on 285
hours (285 hours x $13 per hour for clerical personnel); $43,680 for
manufacturers' compliance with third-party disclosure requirements,
based on 3,360 hours (3,360 hours x $13 per hour for clerical
personnel); and $2,601,645 for disclosure compliance by installers, new
home sellers, and retailers (113,115 hours x $23 per hour for sales
persons).
There are no significant current capital or other non-labor costs
associated with this Rule. Because the Rule has been in effect since
1980, members of the industry are familiar with its requirements and
already have in place the equipment for conducting tests and storing
records. New products are introduced infrequently. Because the required
disclosures are placed on packaging or on the product itself, the
Rule's additional disclosure requirements do not cause industry members
to incur any significant additional non-labor associated costs.
William Blumenthal
General Counsel
[FR Doc. E8-16898 Filed 7-23-08: 8:45 am]
Billing Code: 6750-01-S