Disaster Assistance Directorate Policy Numbers 9100.1 and 9523.1 Snow Assistance and Severe Winter Storm Policy, 43243-43250 [E8-16866]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 143 / Thursday, July 24, 2008 / Notices
workplace exposure data, health effects,
and control technologies.
Submitted comments on the revised
draft Roadmap should indicate the
pertinent page(s) and line(s) in the draft
document being addressed.
Contact Person for Technical
Information: Paul Middendorf, Office of
the Director, NIOSH, CDC, telephone
(513) 533–8606, e-mail
pmiddendorf@cdc.gov.
Dated: July 16, 2008.
James D. Seligman,
Chief Information Officer, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E8–16946 Filed 7–23–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–19–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
Prospective Grant of Exclusive
License: Respiratory Syncytial Virus
Vaccine or Therapeutic
Technology Transfer Office,
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Notice.
and other materials relating to the
contemplated license should be directed
to Andrew Watkins, J.D., Ph.D.,
Director, Technology Transfer Office,
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), 4770 Buford
Highway, Mailstop K–79, Atlanta, GA
30341, telephone: (770) 488–8600;
facsimile: (770) 488–8615. Applications
for a license filed in response to this
notice will be treated as objections to
the grant of the contemplated license.
Only written comments and/or
applications for a license which are
received by CDC within thirty days of
this notice will be considered.
Comments and objections submitted in
response to this notice will not be made
available for public inspection, and, to
the extent permitted by law, will not be
released under the Freedom of
Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552.
Dated: June 17, 2008.
James D. Seligman,
Chief Information Officer, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E8–16943 Filed 7–23–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This is a notice in accordance
with 35 U.S.C. 209(e) and 37 CFR
404.7(a)(1)(i) that the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC),
Technology Transfer Office, Department
of Health and Human Services (DHHS),
is contemplating the grant of a
worldwide exclusive license to practice
the inventions embodied in the patent
referred to below to Trellis Bioscience,
Inc., having a place of business in South
San Francisco, CA. The patent rights in
these inventions have been assigned to
the government of the United States of
America. The patent(s) to be licensed
are: U.S. Patent Application 11/139,372
entitled ‘‘Compositions and Methods for
Modulating RSV Infection and
Immunity,’’ priority date 10.18.2000,
and all related foreign patent
applications. CDC Technology ID No. I–
022–00.
Status: Published.
Priority Date: 10.18.2000
The prospective exclusive license will
be royalty-bearing and will comply with
the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C.
209 and 37 CFR 404.7.
Technology: This technology provides
new methods for prevention and
treatment of respiratory syncytial virus
(RSV) infection.
ADDRESSES: Requests for a copy of this
patent application, inquiries, comments,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Jul 23, 2008
Jkt 214001
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
43243
DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood
Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7188,
Bethesda, MD 20892–7924, 301–435–0280,
krullh@nhlbi.nih.gov.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for
Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung
Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases
and Resources Research, National Institutes
of Health, HHS)
Dated: July 17, 2008.
David Clary,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E8–16841 Filed 7–23–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–M
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
[FEMA–2005–0005]
Z–RIN 1660–ZA01
Disaster Assistance Directorate Policy
Numbers 9100.1 and 9523.1 Snow
Assistance and Severe Winter Storm
Policy
Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed policy and
opportunity for comment.
AGENCY:
National Institutes of Health
National Heart, Lung, and Blood
Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice
is hereby given of the following
meeting.
The meeting will be closed to the
public in accordance with the
provisions set forth in sections
552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C.,
as amended. The grant applications and
the discussions could disclose
confidential trade secrets or commercial
property such as patentable material,
and personal information concerning
individuals associated with the grant
applications, the disclosure of which
would constitute a clearly unwarranted
invasion of personal privacy.
Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung,
and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel;
Research Demonstration and Dissemination
Projects.
Date: August 19, 2008.
Time: 1 p.m. to 3 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: National Institutes of Health,
Rockledge Two, 6701 Rockledge Drive,
Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference
Call).
Contact Person: Holly K. Krull, PhD,
Scientific Review Officer, Review Branch/
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) proposes
to revise its Snow Assistance and Severe
Winter Storm Policy. The current policy
provides the procedures and
requirements for FEMA in making
recommendations to the President for
either a declaration of emergency or a
major disaster resulting from a
snowstorm. This proposed policy would
maintain the current policy requirement
that a county experience a ‘‘record or
near-record’’ snowfall, but also would
require that the State meet the
requirements of a major disaster
declaration. It would stipulate that the
Governor must direct execution of the
State emergency plan and the State must
demonstrate that the capabilities of the
State to effectively respond to the event
are or will be exceeded. States and
communities requesting aid also would
be required to submit an estimate of
eligible public assistance costs (estimate
of public assistance divided by county
and State populations, respectively),
including snow assistance costs for a 48hour period that meet or exceed the
county and statewide per capita cost
threshold. These proposed criteria are
used by FEMA solely for consideration
E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM
24JYN1
43244
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 143 / Thursday, July 24, 2008 / Notices
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with NOTICES
in making recommendations to the
President and do not bind the ability of
the President, in his discretion, to make
declarations of emergencies or major
disasters.
DATES: FEMA invites comments on the
proposed policy and will accept
comments until August 25, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Docket Number FEMA–
2005–0005, by one of the following
methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: FEMA-RULES@dhs.gov.
Include Docket Number FEMA–2005–
0005 in the subject line of the message.
Facsimile: 866–466–5370.
Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier: Rules
Docket Clerk, Office of Chief Counsel,
Federal Emergency Management
Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Room 840,
Washington, DC 20472.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number (if available). Regardless
of the method used for submitting
comments or material, all submissions
will be posted, without change, to the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov, and will include
any personal information you provide.
Therefore, submitting this information
makes it public. You may wish to read
the Privacy Act notice that is available
on the Privacy and Use Notice link on
the Administration Navigation Bar of
www.regulations.gov.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. Submitted
comments may also be inspected at
FEMA, Office of Chief Counsel, 500 C
Street, SW., Room 840, Washington, DC
20472.
For detailed instructions on
submitting comments, see the ‘‘Public
Participation’’ heading of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James A. Walke, Chief, Public
Assistance Division, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, 500 C Street SW.,
Room 406D, Washington, DC 20472,
202–646–2751; (facsimile) 202–646–
3304; or (e-mail) James.Walke@dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Public Participation
The Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) invites any interested
persons to participate in the revision of
this policy by submitting written data,
views, or arguments on all aspects of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Jul 23, 2008
Jkt 214001
proposed policy. FEMA also invites
comments that relate to the economic
effects that might result from the
implementation of the revised proposed
snow policy. Comments should refer to
a specific portion or paragraph of the
notice, explain your reason for any
recommended change, and include data,
information, or authority that support
your recommended change. See
ADDRESSES above for information on
how to submit comments.
II. Background and Purpose
Under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster
Relief and Emergency Assistance Act,
42 U.S.C. 5121–5207 (Stafford Act),
FEMA coordinates Federal actions to
provide supplemental aid to States and
communities to assist in the response
and recovery from emergencies and
major disasters. See also 44 CFR 206.62.
Federal assistance authorized by a
Presidential emergency or major disaster
declaration provides immediate and
short-term assistance that is essential to
save lives, protect property, and
safeguard the public health and safety.
FEMA makes recommendations to the
President for use in his determination in
granting an emergency or major disaster
declaration. On December 28, 1999,
FEMA issued its snow assistance policy
describing FEMA’s procedures for
evaluating requests for emergency and
major disaster declarations due to
snowfall. The Snow Assistance Policy,
along with other FEMA Public
Assistance Program policies, is available
on FEMA’s Web site at https://
www.fema.gov/government/grant/pa/
9523_1.shtm. The parameters set forth
in the Snow Assistance Policy are used
by FEMA solely for consideration in
making recommendations to the
President under the Stafford Act and do
not bind the ability of the President, in
his discretion, to make declarations of
emergencies or major disasters.
FEMA proposes to revise its snow
assistance policy. Under the Stafford
Act, FEMA is required to provide public
notice and an opportunity to comment
before amending any policy that could
result in a significant reduction of
assistance. 42 U.S.C. 5165c.
FEMA’s current snow assistance
policy evaluates requests for snow
assistance under the criteria for an
‘‘emergency’’ declaration under 44 CFR
206.35, rather than as a request for a
‘‘major disaster’’ declaration under 44
CFR 206.36. However, the Stafford Act
(42 U.S.C. 5122) and FEMA regulations
(44 CFR 206.2(a)(17)) include
‘‘snowstorms’’ in the definition of
‘‘major disasters.’’ This proposed policy
would require snowstorm events to be
evaluated under the criteria for ‘‘major
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
disaster’’ under 44 CFR 206.36,
consistent with the Stafford Act and
FEMA regulations.
Under FEMA regulations, FEMA may
find that a State or community is
eligible for assistance from FEMA for an
emergency or major disaster declaration
resulting from snow or blizzard
conditions only where the storm results
in ‘‘record or near record’’ snowfall for
that area, as determined by official
government records (see 44 CFR
206.227). Under the current policy, for
a county to be eligible for an emergency
declaration due to snow, at least one
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA) station within
that county must receive a snowfall at
a historical record or a near-record
(within 10 percent of record) snowfall
level. Because most counties have
multiple NOAA stations, the station
with the lowest historical snowfall
record is compared to the highest event
snowfall to determine the county’s
eligibility for a snow assistance
emergency declaration.
FEMA’s proposed policy would retain
the requirement that a State demonstrate
record or near-record snowfall in the
county seeking relief (though FEMA
proposes to change the method for
measuring this requirement as discussed
below). Under this proposed policy, the
Governor must direct activation of the
State emergency plan and the State must
demonstrate that the capabilities of the
State to effectively respond to the event
are or will be exceeded.
States also would be required to
submit an estimate of eligible public
assistance costs (estimate of public
assistance divided by county and State
populations, respectively) including
snow assistance costs for a 48-hour
period that meet or exceed the county
and statewide per capita cost threshold.
Snow assistance costs will be included
for only those areas that meet the
record, near-record, or contiguous
county criteria of this proposed policy.
For major disaster declarations, per
capita costs are used as an indicator of
the State or county capability of
responding to the event. This
information is not required under the
current snow policy. While this
requirement would be new to FEMA’s
snow policy, an estimate of damages is
a normal requirement for all States
requesting a major disaster declaration
(see 44 CFR 206.36 and 44 CFR 206.48).
Also, criteria for evaluating event
snowfall data would change to require
comparison with the NOAA station that
has the highest historical record to
determine a true record or near-record
snowfall event.
E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM
24JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 143 / Thursday, July 24, 2008 / Notices
Over the last nine snow seasons
(1998–1999 through 2006–2007), FEMA
has processed an average of six State
requests for snow assistance each
season, and FEMA has received no
indication from those applications that
its documentation requirements are
overly burdensome. Indeed, the quantity
and quality of the information provided
in declarations requests that FEMA
receives from most States well exceed
the information requirements under the
current policy.
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with NOTICES
III. Discussion of Comments Received
on September 17, 2002 Proposed
Revision
On September 17, 2002, FEMA
published for public comment a
proposed revision to the snow
assistance policy in the Federal Register
at 67 FR 58608. The most significant
change proposed was the addition of
‘‘local impact’’ criteria to the
requirement that a county have a record
or near-record snowfall event as the
primary consideration for making a
recommendation for a snow assistance
emergency declaration. The ‘‘local
impacts’’ as proposed included:
activation of the National Guard for
search and rescue operations, opening
of multiple shelters for stranded
motorists and victims of power outages,
closure of interstate and State highways
for over 48 hours, power outages across
the affected area exceeding 48 hours,
closure of local government offices
exceeding 48 hours, and the State’s need
for a significant level of Federal
equipment and labor to address the
impacts of the event. Another proposed
revision required the use of the highestrecord snowfall in the county to
determine whether the county met the
record or near-record criteria for a
county snow assistance designation.
FEMA received five letters
commenting on the September 2002
proposed revision to the snow policy,
including comments from the National
Emergency Management Association,
State Emergency Management Offices,
and a local government. FEMA has
analyzed those comments and
determined that the ‘‘local impact’’
criteria should be removed from the
proposed policy. The following is a
summary of the comments received and
responses to those comments.
Impact criteria
One commenter cited our ‘‘local
impact’’ criteria and policy statement
that FEMA would require evidence of
‘‘some’’ of the local impacts before
making a recommendation to the
President to declare a snow assistance
emergency. The commenter stated that
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Jul 23, 2008
Jkt 214001
the term ‘‘some’’ is too general and
ambiguous, and clarification is needed
to provide guidance so that the States
can decide whether the necessary
criteria have been met to warrant a
request for Federal assistance.
Two commenters stated that the
requirement that the National Guard be
activated for search and rescue was too
restrictive and that the ‘‘local impact’’
criteria under the snow assistance
policy should be flexible to allow for
State and local search and rescue
operations to satisfy the criteria as well.
One commenter stated that the
requirement for having to open multiple
shelters was too restrictive, because in
some low-population areas only one
shelter may be required.
One commenter stated that the
requirement that power outages exceed
48 hours in order to satisfy the ‘‘local
impact’’ criteria was unrealistic, as a
power outage of less than 48 hours may
have a significant impact in some areas.
Another commenter stated that the
requirement that local government
offices be closed in excess of 48 hours
in order to satisfy the ‘‘local impact’’
criteria is not realistic for all States.
One commenter stated that the
requirement for a significant level of
Federal equipment and labor to address
the impacts of the event was too
restrictive, as Federal equipment is
limited in some States.
FEMA agrees with all of the
comments related to the ‘‘local impact’’
criteria. Furthermore, FEMA has
determined that, with the exception of
‘‘record’’ or ‘‘near record’’ snowfall that
is required by 44 CFR 206.227, the
criteria for major disaster declarations
for snowstorms should be consistent
with all other events. As there are no
specific types of local impacts required
under the Stafford Act or FEMA’s
regulations for other types of events, the
criteria should be removed from the
proposed policy.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA) Snow Data
There were several comments
concerning the use of snowfall data
from NOAA. One commenter stated that
the National Weather Service (NWS)
does not have knowledge of other
monitoring stations that NOAA uses to
identify historic records. Also, NWS
uses a single measurement for a county
or some measurements at stations that
are different from other NOAA stations.
The National Climatic Data Center
(NCDC), which is a part of NOAA,
provides historical 1-, 2-, and 3-day
snowfall data from measurements made
by observers who are part of the NWS
airport stations and the NWS
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43245
Cooperative Network. These observers
are trained by NOAA experts on proper
snowfall measurement techniques and
provided with the proper equipment
and guidelines for ensuring accurate
observations. NOAA collects and
distributes snowfall data from these
trained, equipped, and supervised
observers (NCDC published data).
In response to these comments and to
maintain consistency of evaluation data
to determine when a snowstorm reaches
record or near-record proportions,
FEMA agreed and changed the language
of the policy to make clear that FEMA
would accept event and historical
snowfall data from the NCDC.
One commenter recommended that
the definition of ‘‘record snowfall’’
should be expanded to indicate that
FEMA consider the record snowfall for
each county. This commenter also
requested that FEMA define how and
where the data are obtained. Another
commenter stated that NOAA’s NCDC
records identify ‘‘observed max’’ at
stations and NOAA’s NWS statistical
analyses show 10-, 25-, 50-, and 100year snowfall values that exceed the
‘‘observed max’’ amount. In light of
these different methodologies,
clarification of what constituted a
‘‘record snowfall’’ was requested.
In this proposed policy, FEMA
expands the definition of ‘‘record
snowfall’’ to indicate that a record
snowfall is considered for each county
or other political subdivision of the
State. In addition, FEMA has restricted
the sources of current event snowfall to
include the NCDC published data and
NWS Cooperative Network Station data.
FEMA also identified the NCDC Web
site where historic record data for 1-,
2-, and 3-day snowfall is obtained. The
Web site uses 1-, 2-, and 3-day record
snowfalls and does not use ‘‘observed
max’’ to identify record snowfall. FEMA
does not consider the statistical analyses
for 10-, 25-, 50-, and 100-year snowfalls
as record snowfall data and they are not
identified in the policy as such.
Another commenter suggested that
FEMA should allow for the use of
Geographic Information Systems (GIS)
comparisons of data as well as the
proposed methodology. The commenter
stated that GIS mapping programs can
provide a more accurate representation
when historic data sites are different
from current sites or when Federal data
are incomplete.
In response to the suggested use of
GIS for comparison of snowfall data,
FEMA proposes the use only of data
provided by the NCDC and NWS
Cooperative Network Stations for
making comparisons to historic snowfall
values. This ensures a consistent
E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM
24JYN1
43246
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 143 / Thursday, July 24, 2008 / Notices
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with NOTICES
approach to the collection of snowfall
data and application of the snow
assistance policy. However, the State
and FEMA may use GIS technology to
represent the snowfall data graphically
to simplify the data comparison process.
This is not specifically stated in the
policy, but the use of GIS technology is
not prohibited.
One commenter disagreed with the
restriction against using snow data from
a reporting station in another State.
FEMA agrees that this restriction was
unnecessary and revised the policy to
remove the restriction.
One commenter expressed concern
with the time it takes NOAA to certify
snowfall data. The commenter stated
that this process takes at least one to
three months and only a few sites
provide snowfall totals immediately.
Our experience with NOAA through
multiple snow emergencies is that
NOAA provides timely snowfall data
very soon after snowstorms. In addition,
FEMA will accept snowfall data
obtained from NWS Cooperative
Network monitoring stations, which is
typically available during and
immediately after a snowfall event.
FEMA has not experienced any delays
in processing snow emergency requests
due to a lack of or untimely snowfall
data from NOAA or NWS.
One commenter stated that the size of
geographic areas in Western and
Northern tier States may skew the data
that are reported for a county or
borough, thereby affecting the level of
assistance that is provided. Also, the
State of Alaska specifically noted that
the size and distance between its
political jurisdictions makes it
unrealistic to use snow data from
adjoining jurisdictions. FEMA
acknowledges that variations in
geographic areas and features make it
difficult in some instances to compare
current and historic snowfall values
from different locations within a county
or other political jurisdiction.
Monitoring stations are frequently
located in or near populated areas,
therefore the use of historical data from
such stations should aid in determining
the severity and magnitude of the
snowstorm event on the given
population in the impacted jurisdiction.
FEMA asserts that its methodology and
criteria are fair and equitable. FEMA
also asserts that this system can be
applied consistently throughout the
country.
Contiguous Counties
Several comments were made
regarding the definition and designation
of ‘‘contiguous counties.’’ One
commenter stated that the definition of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Jul 23, 2008
Jkt 214001
contiguous county was not consistent
with the definition in FEMA Policy
9122.1 ‘‘Designation of Counties for
Major Disaster Declarations.’’ FEMA
Policy 9122.1 has since been amended
by a memorandum dated September 6,
2005, and that definition of contiguous
county is no longer in effect. However,
FEMA agreed that the definition should
be clarified. In the proposed policy, a
contiguous county is defined as ‘‘a
county in the same State that shares a
common border with a core county
without geographic separation other
than by a minor body of water, typically
not exceeding one mile between the
land areas of such counties.’’
Long-Term Snowfall and Eligible Time
Period
Several commenters remarked that the
policy did not address snow events that
were more than three days in duration,
and that the assistance period was too
short to address these types of events.
FEMA agreed that snowfall events that
were more than three days duration
could create emergency conditions.
Therefore, FEMA expanded the
definition of ‘‘record snowfall’’ to
include snowfall that occurs over a
period exceeding three consecutive
days. These events will be evaluated on
a case-by-case basis.
One commenter suggested extending
the assistance period from two to three
days, with a two-day extension under
extreme circumstances. One commenter
also stated that 48 hours was not long
enough to address lake effect snows.
Another commenter stated that if a
storm continues beyond the 48-hour
period, the cost for snow removal
beyond the 48-hour period should be
part of the consideration for
determining the assistance period. One
commenter suggested that the financial
impacts to a local or State agency
should be taken into consideration by
FEMA, especially if a local or State
agency can show a serious financial
burden. One commenter disagreed with
the provision that snow removal costs
not be included when evaluating a
request for a major disaster declaration.
The commenter stated that these are
extraordinary costs to State and local
budgets and excluding these costs
would likely limit such declarations to
ice storms.
FEMA believes that the 48-hour
assistance period, with an extension to
72 hours, is an appropriate assistance
period for both short and long duration
snowfalls. The assistance is intended for
opening emergency access and to help
restore critical services. It is not
intended to cover the entire cost or even
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
a significant portion of the cost of longterm snow removal operations.
FEMA recognizes that snow removal
operations can create significant
financial impacts at the State and local
level. While our assistance is generally
financial in nature, FEMA intends that
this assistance would open emergency
access on roads and to critical facilities
and would address the public health
and safety threats created by a
snowstorm. Snowstorms are events that
are foreseen and budgeted for in
advance. Therefore, FEMA assistance is
not appropriate when the impacts are
only financial in nature. Also, to
consider the financial impacts of a
snowstorm alone could lead to
inconsistent implementation of the
policy. State and local budgets and
budgetary processes vary significantly
making it difficult to judge financial
impact on a consistently fair basis. In
this proposed policy, snow removal
costs in counties that meet the criteria
of this policy are included as eligible
costs when evaluating major disaster
requests.
Eligible Work
FEMA also received several
comments stating that the definition of
‘‘snow removal assistance’’ needs to be
more flexible to allow for opening
emergency access into hospitals,
nursing homes, schools, transportation
facilities, and other critical facilities.
Other comments stated that the policy
required clarification of what work is
eligible for FEMA snow assistance
during the eligible time period.
Note that the use of an eligible time
period in both the current policy and
the proposed policy is intended to
eliminate the requirement of
determining where and how much snow
removal is eligible. In the proposed
policy, FEMA uses the term ‘‘snow
assistance’’ rather than ‘‘snow removal
assistance’’ because it incorporates all
activities under Category B, emergency
protective measures, as described in the
Public Assistance Guide, FEMA 322,
(https://www.fema.gov/pdf/government/
grant/pa/pagprnt_071905.pdf) that are
related to the event. FEMA broadened
the definition of ‘‘snow assistance’’ to
include snow removal, salting, sanding,
snow dumps, and de-icing from other
facilities in addition to roads. The intent
of the proposed policy was not to
restrict eligibility for FEMA snow
assistance only to roads. The new
definition is intended to clarify that all
snow removal related activities from
facilities that are the responsibility of an
eligible applicant and that are
performed within the assistance time
E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM
24JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 143 / Thursday, July 24, 2008 / Notices
period are eligible for FEMA snow
assistance.
One commenter requested that FEMA
define the width of roadway that is
eligible for snow removal. Several
comments requested that FEMA
broaden the definition of ‘‘snow
removal assistance’’ to define when
loading and hauling of snow and the
creation of snow dumps are eligible for
snow assistance. The eligible time
period eliminates the need to define an
eligible road width as an applicant has
the discretion to perform any snow
removal it deems necessary within its
selected assistance period. FEMA
expanded the examples of the kinds of
work eligible for snow assistance to
include the use of snow dumps.
One commenter requested that FEMA
more clearly articulate the kind of
assistance provided for snow removal
when an area does not meet the record,
near-record, or contiguous county
designation criteria as described in
paragraph (b) of the policy. FEMA
added clarification stating that,
generally, snow removal that is
necessary to perform otherwise eligible
emergency work, such as debris removal
or power restoration, is eligible for snow
assistance provided there is a
Presidentially-declared major disaster.
Eligible Applicants
One commenter requested that FEMA
clearly define all applicants that are
eligible for snow assistance. FEMA
revised the policy to state that all
eligible applicants as defined in 44 CFR
206.222 are eligible for snow assistance.
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with NOTICES
Severe Winter Storm
One commenter stated that our
definition of ‘‘severe winter storm’’
appears to require that snow, ice, high
winds, and blizzard conditions must all
occur in one storm. The commenter
requested that FEMA revise the
definition of ‘‘severe winter storm’’ so
that only one or more of those
conditions need occur, not all. FEMA
agreed and revised the definition
accordingly.
Inconsistency Between Fire and Snow
Declarations
One commenter stated that the
requirements for fire and snow
emergency declarations are not
consistent with each other. The
commenter stated that FEMA does not
place as stringent requirements for Fire
Management Assistance Grants as
FEMA does for Public Assistance snow
assistance grants. The commenter cited
that the ‘‘local impact’’ criteria in the
proposed snow policy are not
requirements for fire assistance. Also,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Jul 23, 2008
Jkt 214001
the commenter stated that an emergency
or disaster declaration is required for
snow assistance, but is not required for
fire assistance.
Under Executive Order 12148 as
amended, the President delegated the
authority to FEMA to provide disaster
assistance grants under section 420 (Fire
Management Assistance) of the Stafford
Act. As such, a Presidential emergency
or disaster declaration is not required
for the provision of assistance in
response to fires. FEMA has not been
delegated such authority for the
provision of snow assistance, and,
therefore a Presidential declaration is
required. As described in our
regulations for fire management
assistance, 44 CFR part 204, the
assistance for fire management is
approved when the determination is
made by FEMA that a fire or fire
complex threatens such destruction as
would constitute a major disaster. Fire
and snow events are two different types
of events, which have different types of
impacts. FEMA treats each type of event
consistently in that the impacts of each
type of event are evaluated as criteria for
the provision of assistance.
Furthermore, FEMA has removed the
‘‘local impact’’ criteria from the
proposed policy such that the criteria
used to evaluate snowstorm events, in
addition to record or near-record
snowfall, are consistent with other types
of events.
Snow Assistance as a Major Disaster
Declaration
In the past, FEMA has evaluated snow
assistance requests by the Governor of a
State under the provisions of 44 CFR
206.35. Since snowstorms are defined as
‘‘major disasters’’ in section 102(2) of
the Stafford Act, FEMA has determined
that these events must be evaluated
under 44 CFR 206.36 before FEMA may
provide snow assistance.
IV. Regulatory Requirements
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review
We have prepared and reviewed this
notice of proposed policy under the
provisions of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review. Under
Executive Order 12866, a significant
regulatory action is subject to review by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) and the requirements of the
Executive Order. The Executive Order
defines a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
as one that is likely to result in a rule
that may:
(1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43247
economy, a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health and safety,
or State, local, or tribal governments or
communities;
(2) Create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken
or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budget impact
of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs or the rights and obligations of
recipients thereof, or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues
arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in the Executive Order.
This notice is a significant regulatory
action, but not an economically
significant regulatory action within the
definition of section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12866, and it adheres to the
principles of the Executive Order. OMB
has reviewed this notice of proposed
policy under the provisions of the
Executive Order.
Under the Stafford Act and 44 CFR
206.227, FEMA provides Federal
assistance for emergency or major
disaster declarations based on snow or
blizzard conditions for cases of record
or near-record snowstorms. The current
snow assistance policy evaluates States’
requests for snow assistance under the
provisions of 44 CFR 206.35. This
proposed policy is intended to make
snow assistance consistent with the
Stafford Act, which defines
‘‘snowstorms’’ as major disaster events
under 42 U.S.C. 5122. See also, 44 CFR
206.2 (a)(17)(defining ‘‘major disaster’’
to include snow storms). This proposed
policy would require snowstorm events
to be evaluated under the provisions of
44 CFR 206.36.
It has been FEMA’s practice to
recommend an emergency declaration,
pursuant to 44 CFR 206.35, when a
county has experienced a record or
near-record snowstorm that is of such
severity and magnitude that effective
response is beyond the capability of the
State and the affected local
governments. In view of the fact that
snowstorms are among the named
natural events in the definition of a
‘‘major disaster’’ in section 102(2) of the
Stafford Act, 42 U.S.C. 5122, this
proposed policy would require that, in
addition to record or near-record
snowfall, applicants for snow assistance
meet the criteria for a major disaster
declaration in sections 44 CFR 206.36
and 44 CFR 206.48.
Over the last nine snow seasons
(1998/1999 through 2006/2007) FEMA
has provided a total of $478,868,342 of
snow assistance under 55 Presidential
declarations for an average of
approximately $53 million per year.
E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM
24JYN1
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with NOTICES
43248
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 143 / Thursday, July 24, 2008 / Notices
FEMA assessed the potential economic
impact of the proposed policy and
concluded that public assistance
funding will be reduced by
approximately 10 percent per year
under this proposed policy.
FEMA has considered a number of
alternatives to this proposed policy. One
alternative would be to continue with
the current policy, which provides an
emergency declaration for snow
assistance. That alternative is not
consistent with the intent of the Stafford
Act, which defines a snowstorm as a
‘‘major disaster.’’ Continuing with the
current snow policy does not provide a
method to evaluate snowfall data as
consistently as the proposed policy. By
continuing to compare a county’s
highest snowfall event data with the
data from the NOAA station with the
lowest historical record snowfall, there
would be no change in the amount of
assistance provided.
Another alternative would be to adopt
only ‘‘local impact’’ criteria, but not
require that States and counties meet
the per capita cost criteria (public
assistance divided by State or county
population) for a major disaster
declaration. If only ‘‘local impact’’
criteria were required, the same level of
financial assistance as the current policy
would be provided under the proposed
policy.
Another alternative would be to
eliminate snowstorms as a natural
disaster event qualifying for a
Presidential disaster declaration and,
therefore, for our grant assistance. Such
an alternative would be contrary to the
Stafford Act, which includes
‘‘snowstorms’’ in its definition of types
of major disasters eligible for FEMA
assistance. As a result, States and
counties would not receive snow
assistance from FEMA as intended in
the Stafford Act.
FEMA believes that the best
alternative is presented in this proposed
policy, which includes per capita cost
criteria and changing the criteria for
evaluating event snowfall to comparison
with the NWS station with the highest
historical record in a county to
determine a true record or near-record
snowfall event. Based on our analysis,
public assistance would be reduced by
an average of 10 percent, or $5.3 million
per year.
Accordingly, FEMA invites comments
on the proposed Snow Assistance and
Severe Winter Storm Policy.
The policy reads as follows:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Jul 23, 2008
Jkt 214001
Text of Proposed Policy
Proposed Snow Assistance and Severe
Winter Storm Policy
(a) Definitions.
Contiguous County means a county in
the same State that shares a common
border with a core county without
geographic separation other than by a
minor body of water, typically not
exceeding one mile between the land
areas of such counties.
Core County means a county that has
a record or near-record snowfall with
public assistance costs that exceed the
per capita threshold defined in FEMA
Policy 9122.1 ‘‘Designation of Counties
for Major Disaster Declarations’’ and is
designated for snow assistance under a
major disaster declaration.
Incident Period means the time span
during which the disaster-causing
incident occurs, e.g., approximately 6:00
p.m., January 5, 2007, through 8:00 a.m.,
January 7, 2007.
Near-Record Snowfall means a
snowfall that approaches, but does not
meet or exceed, the historical record
snowfall within a county as published
by the National Climatic Data Center
(NCDC). FEMA generally considers
snowfall within ten percent of the
record amount to be a near-record
snowfall.
Record Snowfall means a snowfall
that meets or exceeds the highest record
snowfall within a county over a 1-,
2-, 3-day or longer period of time, as
published by the NCDC.
Snow Assistance means assistance for
all eligible activities under Category B,
emergency protective measures (see
Categories of Work in the Public
Assistance Guide, FEMA 322, https://
www.fema.gov/pdf/government/grant/
pa/pagprnt_071905.pdf) related to a
snowstorm, including snow removal,
de-icing, salting, snow dumps, and
sanding of roads and other eligible
facilities, as well as search and rescue,
sheltering, and other emergency
protective measures.
Snowstorm means an event in which
a State has record or near record
snowfall in one or more counties, as
determined by paragraph (e), and that
overwhelms the capability of the
affected State and local governments to
respond to the event. While snowstorms
will normally only receive Snow
Assistance, other categories of
supplemental Federal assistance may be
designated for a snowstorm declaration
as warranted.
Severe Winter Storm means an event
that occurs during the winter season
that includes one or more of the
following conditions: Snow, ice, high
winds, blizzard conditions, and other
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
wintry conditions; and that causes
substantial physical damage or loss to
improved property.
(b) Snowstorm Declaration Criteria.
FEMA will only recommend a major
disaster declaration to the President in
response to a snowstorm; an emergency
declaration request in response to a
snowstorm will not be recommended to
the President. However, the criteria
listed in this policy are solely for use by
the Agency in making recommendations
to the President and in no manner
restrict the ability of the President, in
his/her discretion, to declare
emergencies or major disasters pursuant
to the Stafford Act.
A snowstorm that meets the following
criteria may be designated a major
disaster under 44 CFR 206.36. In
addition to the following county
criteria, a State must also meet the
statewide per capita cost threshold
required by 44 CFR 206.48(a)(1) based
on eligible public assistance costs
including the snow assistance costs it
incurs within the prescribed 48 hour
period.
Each county included in a Governor’s
request for a declaration must have a
record or near-record snowfall, or meet
the contiguous county criteria described
in this policy, have estimated public
assistance costs including snow
assistance costs within a 48 hour period
that equal or exceed the county per
capita cost threshold required for a
major disaster declaration, which is
published annually in the Federal
Register (see 71 FR 59514, on October
10, 2006) and the State must
demonstrate that the capabilities of the
State to effectively respond to the event
are or will be exceeded. An applicant
may select a 48 hour period for
estimating purposes, but use a different
48 hour period when submitting actual
costs.
(c) Snowstorm Declaration Requests.
(1) Within 30-days following a record
snowstorm, the Governor shall submit a
request for a snowstorm major disaster
declaration that meets the requirements
of 44 CFR 206.36, 44 CFR 206.48, and
this policy. A Governor’s request for a
snowstorm major disaster declaration
shall cite ‘‘Snowstorm’’ as the incident
type in the Governor’s request, as will
the Regional Administrator’s Regional
Disaster Summary and the Regional
Analysis and Recommendation.
Furthermore, the Governor’s request
shall provide the following information:
(i) Overview of the event;
(ii) Core and contiguous counties for
which a snowstorm declaration is
requested;
(iii) Date(s) of snowfall;
E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM
24JYN1
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 143 / Thursday, July 24, 2008 / Notices
(iv) For each requested county, copies
of event daily snowfall totals from NWS
stations and historical record snowfall
data from the NCDC to maintain
consistency of evaluation data to
determine when a snowstorm reaches
record or near-record proportions;
(v) A description of State and local
resources activated in response to the
event;
(vi) The extent of search and rescue
operations performed and impacts to
State and local government operations;
(vii) Any other localized impacts as
described in 44 CFR 206.48(a)(2);
(viii) Total estimated eligible costs for
each core and contiguous county,
including the estimated snow assistance
costs for a 48 hour period. The county
per capita estimate of costs, which
includes the estimated eligible costs
incurred by State agencies working
within each county, must meet or
exceed the county per capita cost
threshold; and
(ix) Total estimated statewide costs,
which include the total of estimated
eligible costs for all counties requested.
The per capita estimate of statewide
costs must meet the statewide per capita
cost threshold in 44 CFR 206.48(a)(1).
(2) The Regional Administrator of
FEMA will evaluate the Governor’s
request and make appropriate
recommendations to the FEMA
Assistant Administrator of the Disaster
Assistance Directorate.
(i) The Regional Disaster Summary
(see Template at https://
declarations.fema.net/) should include:
(A) An overview of the snowstorm;
(B) A summary of statewide and
localized impacts;
(C) A summary of State and local
resources dedicated to alleviating the
emergency, to include shelter
information;
(D) A comparison of actual event
snowfall to the highest historical record
snowfall for each county for which
snow assistance is requested; and
(E) An identification of any
extenuating circumstances.
(ii) The Regional Analysis and
Recommendation (see Template at
https://declarations.fema.net/) should
include:
(A) The recommended Incident
Period of the event, and the Categories
of Work recommended (see Public
Assistance Guide, FEMA 322, page 44
(https://www.fema.gov/pdf/government/
grant/pa/pagprnt_071905.pdf);
(B) Confirmation that the Governor
has taken appropriate action under State
law and directed the execution of the
State emergency plan, and that the
Governor’s request meets all statutory
requirements;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Jul 23, 2008
Jkt 214001
(C) An evaluation of statewide and
localized impacts;
(D) The type of assistance needed;
(E) A recommendation of a major
disaster declaration for a State that met
the required statewide per capita cost
threshold and the other criteria; or a
recommendation of denial of a major
disaster declaration for a State that did
not meet the required statewide per
capita cost threshold or the other
criteria; and
(F) A list of the recommended
counties that met the requirements for a
major disaster declaration for snow
assistance under this policy.
(3) The FEMA Administrator may add
counties to a snowstorm declaration
after the President has declared a major
disaster. Requests for additional
counties must meet the criteria for
designation under paragraph (b) of this
policy and include the documentation
required under paragraph (c) of this
policy. Such requests may be made
within 30-days of the declaration, or the
end of the incident period, whichever is
later.
(d) Use of Official Government
Snowfall Data.
(1) Current Snowfall Data.
A Governor’s request for a snowstorm
major disaster declaration shall include
snowfall amounts measured and
published by the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
for the current snowstorm for each
county for which snow assistance is
requested. The NCDC, which is a part of
NOAA, publishes snowfall data from
measurements made by observers who
are part of the National Weather Service
(NWS), airport stations, and the NWS
Cooperative Network. FEMA will rely
primarily on snowfall measurements
taken at NWS Cooperative Network
Stations, but in cases where Cooperative
Network Stations do not exist or do not
report, FEMA will accept snowfall
measurements from other sources that
have been verified by the NCDC or
NWS. A Governor’s request for a
snowstorm major disaster declaration
must include copies of all NCDC or
NWS Cooperative Network Station
reports published for the counties for
which snow assistance is requested.
(2) Historical Snowfall Records.
FEMA accepts historical snowfall
records maintained by NCDC. NCDC’s
Web site (see https://
www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/ncdc.html)
provides snowfall amounts recorded at
NWS Cooperative Network Stations for
single and multiple day events. If NCDC
data are not available or do not reflect
snowfall records through the previous
year’s snow season, such data should be
obtained from regional NWS offices and
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43249
provided as part of the Regional
Analysis and Recommendation.
(e) Determining Record and NearRecord Snowfalls.
The following criteria will be used to
determine record or near-record
snowfalls:
(1) Current snowfall amounts under
paragraph (d)(1) of this policy will be
compared with the historical record
snowfall amounts under paragraph
(d)(2) of this policy for a like number of
days without regard for the month in
which the record snowfall or current
event occurred.
(2) For multiple day snowstorms, a
county that meets the 1-day record or
near-record requirement on any one
day, or the 2-day record or near-record
over two consecutive days, or the 3-day
record or near-record over three
consecutive days, etc., will have met the
record or near-record criteria for that
county.
(3) When data from multiple NWS
Cooperative Network Stations exist
within a county, the highest current
event snowfall reported by the NWS
within that county will be compared to
the highest historical snowfall record for
that county.
(4) For counties that do not have
NCDC or NWS historical record
snowfall data, the historical record from
the nearest NWS Cooperative Network
Station in an adjacent county, even if
located in an adjacent State, may be
used for determining historical snowfall
records.
(5) If current event snowfall data
under paragraph (d)(1) of this policy are
not available from the NWS for a
county, the nearest NWS Cooperative
Network Station data from an adjacent
county, even if located in an adjacent
State, may be used.
(6) A county that does not receive a
record or near-record snowfall, but is
contiguous to a county that does receive
a record or near-record snowfall, may be
designated for snow assistance if the
contiguous county has current event
snowfall under paragraph (d)(1) of this
policy that meets or exceeds the current
event snowfall under paragraph (d)(1) of
this policy of a county that has a record
or near-record snowfall. This
comparison is based on the highest
current event snowfall received by each
county as reported by the NWS.
(7) Counties that experience snowfalls
occurring over a period exceeding three
consecutive days that do not reach
record or near-record snowfalls during a
three-day period, and for which there
are no historical snowfall records for a
period exceeding three days with NCDC
or NWS, will be considered for a major
E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM
24JYN1
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with NOTICES
43250
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 143 / Thursday, July 24, 2008 / Notices
disaster declaration on a case-by-case
basis.
(f) Eligible Period of Assistance.
(1) Snow assistance is available for all
‘‘eligible costs’’ incurred over a
continuous 48-hour period. Applicants
may select a 48-hour period during
which the highest eligible costs were
incurred. Once costs are submitted for
the chosen 48-hour period that selected
48-hour period cannot be changed.
(2) The FEMA Assistant
Administrator of the Disaster Assistance
Directorate may extend the eligible time
period of assistance by 24 hours in
counties where snowfall quantities
greatly exceed record amounts. To be
eligible for a time extension, the current
event snowfall must exceed the
historical record snowfall by at least 50
percent. The time period will be
extended 24 hours for each designated
county that meets this 50 percent
criterion.
(3) Different applicants in the same
designated county may use different 48hour periods. However, all agencies or
instrumentalities of a local government
must use the same 48-hour time period.
(4) A State agency, such as a
Department of Transportation, that
provides snow assistance in multiple
locations throughout the State, may use
different 48-hour periods.
(g) Eligible Applicants.
Entities that meet the applicant
eligibility, 44 CFR 206.222, and are
performing work that meets the
requirements of general work eligibility,
44 CFR 206.223, are eligible for snow
assistance.
(h) Eligible Work.
Eligible work, under Category B,
emergency protective measures, as
described in the Public Assistance
Guide, FEMA 322, (https://
www.fema.gov/pdf/government/grant/
pa/pagprnt_071905.pdf) includes snow
removal, snow dumps, de-icing, salting,
and sanding of roads and other facilities
essential to eliminate or lessen
immediate threats to life, public health,
and safety. In addition, activities related
to the snowstorm such as search and
rescue, sheltering, and other emergency
protective measures are eligible work.
Other categories of work may be eligible
under a snowstorm declaration where
appropriate.
(i) Eligible Costs.
FEMA will provide snow assistance
during the 48-hour period for the
overtime but not the straight time cost
of the applicant’s regularly-employed
personnel. The cost of contract labor
(including temporary hires who perform
eligible emergency work) is an eligible
cost, as are the costs for equipment and
materials used in the performance of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Jul 23, 2008
Jkt 214001
eligible work. If applicants award
contracts for periods greater than the
eligible period of assistance, eligible
funding will be limited to the costs
incurred during the eligible period of
assistance. The same pro-rata method
for calculating eligible funding applies
to all other eligible snow assistance
costs.
(j) Insurance. It is the responsibility of
an applicant to notify the Regional
Administrator of FEMA, through the
State, of any actual or anticipated
proceeds from insurance covering snow
removal or other snow assistance costs.
FEMA will deduct the actual or
anticipated amount of snow removal or
other snow assistance cost insurance
proceeds from policies in force at the
time of the snowfall.
(k) Severe Winter Storm Declarations.
(1) Severe Winter Storm declaration
requests must satisfy the requirements
of 44 CFR 206.36 and 44 CFR 206.48,
but are not required to meet the record
or near record snowfall requirements
described under paragraph (b) of this
policy. FEMA will not include snow
removal costs when calculating the per
capita cost impacts for a severe winter
storm declaration unless the county
qualifies for snow assistance under
paragraph (b) of this policy.
(2) In a major disaster declaration for
a Severe Winter Storm, snow removal
costs will not be eligible for FEMA
assistance if the county does not meet
the requirements for snow assistance
under paragraph (b) of this policy. A
limited level of snow removal incidental
to disaster response may be eligible for
assistance. Generally, snow removal that
is necessary to perform otherwise
eligible emergency work is eligible. For
example, snow removal necessary to
access debris or to repair downed power
lines is eligible, while normal clearance
of snow from roads is not eligible.
(3) A Governor’s request for a major
disaster declaration as a result of a
Severe Winter Storm shall cite ‘‘Severe
Winter Storm’’ as the incident type in
the Governor’s request as will the
Regional Administrator’s Regional
Disaster Summary and the Regional
Analysis and Recommendation.
(4) The procedures for requesting and
evaluating a Severe Winter Storm
declaration will follow the same process
as any request for a major disaster
declaration as outlined in 44 CFR part
206 subpart B.
(5) The evaluation of current and
historical snowfall data for the
designation of snow assistance, if
warranted, will follow the same
procedures as described for snow
assistance in this policy.
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: July 11, 2008.
R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency
Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E8–16866 Filed 7–23–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–10–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
[Docket ID FEMA–2008–0009]
National Disaster Housing Strategy
Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request
for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) is
accepting comments on the National
Disaster Housing Strategy (NDHS). The
NDHS is intended to serve two
purposes. It describes how we as a
Nation currently provide housing to
those affected by disasters, and charts
the new direction that our disaster
housing efforts must take if we are to
better meet the emergent needs of
disaster victims and communities.
DATES: Comments must be received by
September 22, 2008.
ADDRESSES: The NDHS is available
online at https://www.regulations.gov.
You may also view a hard copy of the
NDHS at the Office of Chief Counsel,
Federal Emergency Management
Agency, Room 835, 500 C Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20472. You may submit
comments on the NDHS, identified by
Docket ID FEMA–2008–0009, by one of
the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: FEMA-POLICY@dhs.gov.
Include Docket ID FEMA–2008–0009 in
the subject line of the message.
Fax: 866–466–5370.
Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier:
Regulation & Policy Team, Office of
Chief Counsel, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, Room 835, 500 C
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472.
Instructions: All Submissions
received must include the agency name
and Docket ID. Regardless of the method
used for submitting comments or
material, all submissions will be posted,
without change, to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov, and will include
any personal information you provide.
Therefore, submitting this information
makes it public. You may wish to read
E:\FR\FM\24JYN1.SGM
24JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 143 (Thursday, July 24, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43243-43250]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-16866]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management Agency
[FEMA-2005-0005]
Z-RIN 1660-ZA01
Disaster Assistance Directorate Policy Numbers 9100.1 and 9523.1
Snow Assistance and Severe Winter Storm Policy
AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed policy and opportunity for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) proposes to
revise its Snow Assistance and Severe Winter Storm Policy. The current
policy provides the procedures and requirements for FEMA in making
recommendations to the President for either a declaration of emergency
or a major disaster resulting from a snowstorm. This proposed policy
would maintain the current policy requirement that a county experience
a ``record or near-record'' snowfall, but also would require that the
State meet the requirements of a major disaster declaration. It would
stipulate that the Governor must direct execution of the State
emergency plan and the State must demonstrate that the capabilities of
the State to effectively respond to the event are or will be exceeded.
States and communities requesting aid also would be required to submit
an estimate of eligible public assistance costs (estimate of public
assistance divided by county and State populations, respectively),
including snow assistance costs for a 48-hour period that meet or
exceed the county and statewide per capita cost threshold. These
proposed criteria are used by FEMA solely for consideration
[[Page 43244]]
in making recommendations to the President and do not bind the ability
of the President, in his discretion, to make declarations of
emergencies or major disasters.
DATES: FEMA invites comments on the proposed policy and will accept
comments until August 25, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket Number FEMA-
2005-0005, by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: FEMA-RULES@dhs.gov. Include Docket Number FEMA-2005-0005 in
the subject line of the message.
Facsimile: 866-466-5370.
Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier: Rules Docket Clerk, Office of Chief
Counsel, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Room
840, Washington, DC 20472.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number (if available). Regardless of the method used for
submitting comments or material, all submissions will be posted,
without change, to the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov, and will include any personal information you
provide. Therefore, submitting this information makes it public. You
may wish to read the Privacy Act notice that is available on the
Privacy and Use Notice link on the Administration Navigation Bar of
www.regulations.gov.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. Submitted comments may also be inspected at FEMA,
Office of Chief Counsel, 500 C Street, SW., Room 840, Washington, DC
20472.
For detailed instructions on submitting comments, see the ``Public
Participation'' heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James A. Walke, Chief, Public
Assistance Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street
SW., Room 406D, Washington, DC 20472, 202-646-2751; (facsimile) 202-
646-3304; or (e-mail) James.Walke@dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Public Participation
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) invites any
interested persons to participate in the revision of this policy by
submitting written data, views, or arguments on all aspects of the
proposed policy. FEMA also invites comments that relate to the economic
effects that might result from the implementation of the revised
proposed snow policy. Comments should refer to a specific portion or
paragraph of the notice, explain your reason for any recommended
change, and include data, information, or authority that support your
recommended change. See ADDRESSES above for information on how to
submit comments.
II. Background and Purpose
Under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency
Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121-5207 (Stafford Act), FEMA coordinates
Federal actions to provide supplemental aid to States and communities
to assist in the response and recovery from emergencies and major
disasters. See also 44 CFR 206.62. Federal assistance authorized by a
Presidential emergency or major disaster declaration provides immediate
and short-term assistance that is essential to save lives, protect
property, and safeguard the public health and safety. FEMA makes
recommendations to the President for use in his determination in
granting an emergency or major disaster declaration. On December 28,
1999, FEMA issued its snow assistance policy describing FEMA's
procedures for evaluating requests for emergency and major disaster
declarations due to snowfall. The Snow Assistance Policy, along with
other FEMA Public Assistance Program policies, is available on FEMA's
Web site at https://www.fema.gov/government/grant/pa/9523_1.shtm. The
parameters set forth in the Snow Assistance Policy are used by FEMA
solely for consideration in making recommendations to the President
under the Stafford Act and do not bind the ability of the President, in
his discretion, to make declarations of emergencies or major disasters.
FEMA proposes to revise its snow assistance policy. Under the
Stafford Act, FEMA is required to provide public notice and an
opportunity to comment before amending any policy that could result in
a significant reduction of assistance. 42 U.S.C. 5165c.
FEMA's current snow assistance policy evaluates requests for snow
assistance under the criteria for an ``emergency'' declaration under 44
CFR 206.35, rather than as a request for a ``major disaster''
declaration under 44 CFR 206.36. However, the Stafford Act (42 U.S.C.
5122) and FEMA regulations (44 CFR 206.2(a)(17)) include ``snowstorms''
in the definition of ``major disasters.'' This proposed policy would
require snowstorm events to be evaluated under the criteria for ``major
disaster'' under 44 CFR 206.36, consistent with the Stafford Act and
FEMA regulations.
Under FEMA regulations, FEMA may find that a State or community is
eligible for assistance from FEMA for an emergency or major disaster
declaration resulting from snow or blizzard conditions only where the
storm results in ``record or near record'' snowfall for that area, as
determined by official government records (see 44 CFR 206.227). Under
the current policy, for a county to be eligible for an emergency
declaration due to snow, at least one National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA) station within that county must receive a
snowfall at a historical record or a near-record (within 10 percent of
record) snowfall level. Because most counties have multiple NOAA
stations, the station with the lowest historical snowfall record is
compared to the highest event snowfall to determine the county's
eligibility for a snow assistance emergency declaration.
FEMA's proposed policy would retain the requirement that a State
demonstrate record or near-record snowfall in the county seeking relief
(though FEMA proposes to change the method for measuring this
requirement as discussed below). Under this proposed policy, the
Governor must direct activation of the State emergency plan and the
State must demonstrate that the capabilities of the State to
effectively respond to the event are or will be exceeded.
States also would be required to submit an estimate of eligible
public assistance costs (estimate of public assistance divided by
county and State populations, respectively) including snow assistance
costs for a 48-hour period that meet or exceed the county and statewide
per capita cost threshold. Snow assistance costs will be included for
only those areas that meet the record, near-record, or contiguous
county criteria of this proposed policy. For major disaster
declarations, per capita costs are used as an indicator of the State or
county capability of responding to the event. This information is not
required under the current snow policy. While this requirement would be
new to FEMA's snow policy, an estimate of damages is a normal
requirement for all States requesting a major disaster declaration (see
44 CFR 206.36 and 44 CFR 206.48). Also, criteria for evaluating event
snowfall data would change to require comparison with the NOAA station
that has the highest historical record to determine a true record or
near-record snowfall event.
[[Page 43245]]
Over the last nine snow seasons (1998-1999 through 2006-2007), FEMA
has processed an average of six State requests for snow assistance each
season, and FEMA has received no indication from those applications
that its documentation requirements are overly burdensome. Indeed, the
quantity and quality of the information provided in declarations
requests that FEMA receives from most States well exceed the
information requirements under the current policy.
III. Discussion of Comments Received on September 17, 2002 Proposed
Revision
On September 17, 2002, FEMA published for public comment a proposed
revision to the snow assistance policy in the Federal Register at 67 FR
58608. The most significant change proposed was the addition of ``local
impact'' criteria to the requirement that a county have a record or
near-record snowfall event as the primary consideration for making a
recommendation for a snow assistance emergency declaration. The ``local
impacts'' as proposed included: activation of the National Guard for
search and rescue operations, opening of multiple shelters for stranded
motorists and victims of power outages, closure of interstate and State
highways for over 48 hours, power outages across the affected area
exceeding 48 hours, closure of local government offices exceeding 48
hours, and the State's need for a significant level of Federal
equipment and labor to address the impacts of the event. Another
proposed revision required the use of the highest-record snowfall in
the county to determine whether the county met the record or near-
record criteria for a county snow assistance designation.
FEMA received five letters commenting on the September 2002
proposed revision to the snow policy, including comments from the
National Emergency Management Association, State Emergency Management
Offices, and a local government. FEMA has analyzed those comments and
determined that the ``local impact'' criteria should be removed from
the proposed policy. The following is a summary of the comments
received and responses to those comments.
Impact criteria
One commenter cited our ``local impact'' criteria and policy
statement that FEMA would require evidence of ``some'' of the local
impacts before making a recommendation to the President to declare a
snow assistance emergency. The commenter stated that the term ``some''
is too general and ambiguous, and clarification is needed to provide
guidance so that the States can decide whether the necessary criteria
have been met to warrant a request for Federal assistance.
Two commenters stated that the requirement that the National Guard
be activated for search and rescue was too restrictive and that the
``local impact'' criteria under the snow assistance policy should be
flexible to allow for State and local search and rescue operations to
satisfy the criteria as well.
One commenter stated that the requirement for having to open
multiple shelters was too restrictive, because in some low-population
areas only one shelter may be required.
One commenter stated that the requirement that power outages exceed
48 hours in order to satisfy the ``local impact'' criteria was
unrealistic, as a power outage of less than 48 hours may have a
significant impact in some areas.
Another commenter stated that the requirement that local government
offices be closed in excess of 48 hours in order to satisfy the ``local
impact'' criteria is not realistic for all States.
One commenter stated that the requirement for a significant level
of Federal equipment and labor to address the impacts of the event was
too restrictive, as Federal equipment is limited in some States.
FEMA agrees with all of the comments related to the ``local
impact'' criteria. Furthermore, FEMA has determined that, with the
exception of ``record'' or ``near record'' snowfall that is required by
44 CFR 206.227, the criteria for major disaster declarations for
snowstorms should be consistent with all other events. As there are no
specific types of local impacts required under the Stafford Act or
FEMA's regulations for other types of events, the criteria should be
removed from the proposed policy.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Snow Data
There were several comments concerning the use of snowfall data
from NOAA. One commenter stated that the National Weather Service (NWS)
does not have knowledge of other monitoring stations that NOAA uses to
identify historic records. Also, NWS uses a single measurement for a
county or some measurements at stations that are different from other
NOAA stations.
The National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), which is a part of NOAA,
provides historical 1-, 2-, and 3-day snowfall data from measurements
made by observers who are part of the NWS airport stations and the NWS
Cooperative Network. These observers are trained by NOAA experts on
proper snowfall measurement techniques and provided with the proper
equipment and guidelines for ensuring accurate observations. NOAA
collects and distributes snowfall data from these trained, equipped,
and supervised observers (NCDC published data).
In response to these comments and to maintain consistency of
evaluation data to determine when a snowstorm reaches record or near-
record proportions, FEMA agreed and changed the language of the policy
to make clear that FEMA would accept event and historical snowfall data
from the NCDC.
One commenter recommended that the definition of ``record
snowfall'' should be expanded to indicate that FEMA consider the record
snowfall for each county. This commenter also requested that FEMA
define how and where the data are obtained. Another commenter stated
that NOAA's NCDC records identify ``observed max'' at stations and
NOAA's NWS statistical analyses show 10-, 25-, 50-, and 100-year
snowfall values that exceed the ``observed max'' amount. In light of
these different methodologies, clarification of what constituted a
``record snowfall'' was requested.
In this proposed policy, FEMA expands the definition of ``record
snowfall'' to indicate that a record snowfall is considered for each
county or other political subdivision of the State. In addition, FEMA
has restricted the sources of current event snowfall to include the
NCDC published data and NWS Cooperative Network Station data. FEMA also
identified the NCDC Web site where historic record data for 1-, 2-, and
3-day snowfall is obtained. The Web site uses 1-, 2-, and 3-day record
snowfalls and does not use ``observed max'' to identify record
snowfall. FEMA does not consider the statistical analyses for 10-, 25-,
50-, and 100-year snowfalls as record snowfall data and they are not
identified in the policy as such.
Another commenter suggested that FEMA should allow for the use of
Geographic Information Systems (GIS) comparisons of data as well as the
proposed methodology. The commenter stated that GIS mapping programs
can provide a more accurate representation when historic data sites are
different from current sites or when Federal data are incomplete.
In response to the suggested use of GIS for comparison of snowfall
data, FEMA proposes the use only of data provided by the NCDC and NWS
Cooperative Network Stations for making comparisons to historic
snowfall values. This ensures a consistent
[[Page 43246]]
approach to the collection of snowfall data and application of the snow
assistance policy. However, the State and FEMA may use GIS technology
to represent the snowfall data graphically to simplify the data
comparison process. This is not specifically stated in the policy, but
the use of GIS technology is not prohibited.
One commenter disagreed with the restriction against using snow
data from a reporting station in another State. FEMA agrees that this
restriction was unnecessary and revised the policy to remove the
restriction.
One commenter expressed concern with the time it takes NOAA to
certify snowfall data. The commenter stated that this process takes at
least one to three months and only a few sites provide snowfall totals
immediately. Our experience with NOAA through multiple snow emergencies
is that NOAA provides timely snowfall data very soon after snowstorms.
In addition, FEMA will accept snowfall data obtained from NWS
Cooperative Network monitoring stations, which is typically available
during and immediately after a snowfall event. FEMA has not experienced
any delays in processing snow emergency requests due to a lack of or
untimely snowfall data from NOAA or NWS.
One commenter stated that the size of geographic areas in Western
and Northern tier States may skew the data that are reported for a
county or borough, thereby affecting the level of assistance that is
provided. Also, the State of Alaska specifically noted that the size
and distance between its political jurisdictions makes it unrealistic
to use snow data from adjoining jurisdictions. FEMA acknowledges that
variations in geographic areas and features make it difficult in some
instances to compare current and historic snowfall values from
different locations within a county or other political jurisdiction.
Monitoring stations are frequently located in or near populated areas,
therefore the use of historical data from such stations should aid in
determining the severity and magnitude of the snowstorm event on the
given population in the impacted jurisdiction. FEMA asserts that its
methodology and criteria are fair and equitable. FEMA also asserts that
this system can be applied consistently throughout the country.
Contiguous Counties
Several comments were made regarding the definition and designation
of ``contiguous counties.'' One commenter stated that the definition of
contiguous county was not consistent with the definition in FEMA Policy
9122.1 ``Designation of Counties for Major Disaster Declarations.''
FEMA Policy 9122.1 has since been amended by a memorandum dated
September 6, 2005, and that definition of contiguous county is no
longer in effect. However, FEMA agreed that the definition should be
clarified. In the proposed policy, a contiguous county is defined as
``a county in the same State that shares a common border with a core
county without geographic separation other than by a minor body of
water, typically not exceeding one mile between the land areas of such
counties.''
Long-Term Snowfall and Eligible Time Period
Several commenters remarked that the policy did not address snow
events that were more than three days in duration, and that the
assistance period was too short to address these types of events. FEMA
agreed that snowfall events that were more than three days duration
could create emergency conditions. Therefore, FEMA expanded the
definition of ``record snowfall'' to include snowfall that occurs over
a period exceeding three consecutive days. These events will be
evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
One commenter suggested extending the assistance period from two to
three days, with a two-day extension under extreme circumstances. One
commenter also stated that 48 hours was not long enough to address lake
effect snows. Another commenter stated that if a storm continues beyond
the 48-hour period, the cost for snow removal beyond the 48-hour period
should be part of the consideration for determining the assistance
period. One commenter suggested that the financial impacts to a local
or State agency should be taken into consideration by FEMA, especially
if a local or State agency can show a serious financial burden. One
commenter disagreed with the provision that snow removal costs not be
included when evaluating a request for a major disaster declaration.
The commenter stated that these are extraordinary costs to State and
local budgets and excluding these costs would likely limit such
declarations to ice storms.
FEMA believes that the 48-hour assistance period, with an extension
to 72 hours, is an appropriate assistance period for both short and
long duration snowfalls. The assistance is intended for opening
emergency access and to help restore critical services. It is not
intended to cover the entire cost or even a significant portion of the
cost of long-term snow removal operations.
FEMA recognizes that snow removal operations can create significant
financial impacts at the State and local level. While our assistance is
generally financial in nature, FEMA intends that this assistance would
open emergency access on roads and to critical facilities and would
address the public health and safety threats created by a snowstorm.
Snowstorms are events that are foreseen and budgeted for in advance.
Therefore, FEMA assistance is not appropriate when the impacts are only
financial in nature. Also, to consider the financial impacts of a
snowstorm alone could lead to inconsistent implementation of the
policy. State and local budgets and budgetary processes vary
significantly making it difficult to judge financial impact on a
consistently fair basis. In this proposed policy, snow removal costs in
counties that meet the criteria of this policy are included as eligible
costs when evaluating major disaster requests.
Eligible Work
FEMA also received several comments stating that the definition of
``snow removal assistance'' needs to be more flexible to allow for
opening emergency access into hospitals, nursing homes, schools,
transportation facilities, and other critical facilities. Other
comments stated that the policy required clarification of what work is
eligible for FEMA snow assistance during the eligible time period.
Note that the use of an eligible time period in both the current
policy and the proposed policy is intended to eliminate the requirement
of determining where and how much snow removal is eligible. In the
proposed policy, FEMA uses the term ``snow assistance'' rather than
``snow removal assistance'' because it incorporates all activities
under Category B, emergency protective measures, as described in the
Public Assistance Guide, FEMA 322, (https://www.fema.gov/pdf/government/
grant/pa/pagprnt_071905.pdf) that are related to the event. FEMA
broadened the definition of ``snow assistance'' to include snow
removal, salting, sanding, snow dumps, and de-icing from other
facilities in addition to roads. The intent of the proposed policy was
not to restrict eligibility for FEMA snow assistance only to roads. The
new definition is intended to clarify that all snow removal related
activities from facilities that are the responsibility of an eligible
applicant and that are performed within the assistance time
[[Page 43247]]
period are eligible for FEMA snow assistance.
One commenter requested that FEMA define the width of roadway that
is eligible for snow removal. Several comments requested that FEMA
broaden the definition of ``snow removal assistance'' to define when
loading and hauling of snow and the creation of snow dumps are eligible
for snow assistance. The eligible time period eliminates the need to
define an eligible road width as an applicant has the discretion to
perform any snow removal it deems necessary within its selected
assistance period. FEMA expanded the examples of the kinds of work
eligible for snow assistance to include the use of snow dumps.
One commenter requested that FEMA more clearly articulate the kind
of assistance provided for snow removal when an area does not meet the
record, near-record, or contiguous county designation criteria as
described in paragraph (b) of the policy. FEMA added clarification
stating that, generally, snow removal that is necessary to perform
otherwise eligible emergency work, such as debris removal or power
restoration, is eligible for snow assistance provided there is a
Presidentially-declared major disaster.
Eligible Applicants
One commenter requested that FEMA clearly define all applicants
that are eligible for snow assistance. FEMA revised the policy to state
that all eligible applicants as defined in 44 CFR 206.222 are eligible
for snow assistance.
Severe Winter Storm
One commenter stated that our definition of ``severe winter storm''
appears to require that snow, ice, high winds, and blizzard conditions
must all occur in one storm. The commenter requested that FEMA revise
the definition of ``severe winter storm'' so that only one or more of
those conditions need occur, not all. FEMA agreed and revised the
definition accordingly.
Inconsistency Between Fire and Snow Declarations
One commenter stated that the requirements for fire and snow
emergency declarations are not consistent with each other. The
commenter stated that FEMA does not place as stringent requirements for
Fire Management Assistance Grants as FEMA does for Public Assistance
snow assistance grants. The commenter cited that the ``local impact''
criteria in the proposed snow policy are not requirements for fire
assistance. Also, the commenter stated that an emergency or disaster
declaration is required for snow assistance, but is not required for
fire assistance.
Under Executive Order 12148 as amended, the President delegated the
authority to FEMA to provide disaster assistance grants under section
420 (Fire Management Assistance) of the Stafford Act. As such, a
Presidential emergency or disaster declaration is not required for the
provision of assistance in response to fires. FEMA has not been
delegated such authority for the provision of snow assistance, and,
therefore a Presidential declaration is required. As described in our
regulations for fire management assistance, 44 CFR part 204, the
assistance for fire management is approved when the determination is
made by FEMA that a fire or fire complex threatens such destruction as
would constitute a major disaster. Fire and snow events are two
different types of events, which have different types of impacts. FEMA
treats each type of event consistently in that the impacts of each type
of event are evaluated as criteria for the provision of assistance.
Furthermore, FEMA has removed the ``local impact'' criteria from the
proposed policy such that the criteria used to evaluate snowstorm
events, in addition to record or near-record snowfall, are consistent
with other types of events.
Snow Assistance as a Major Disaster Declaration
In the past, FEMA has evaluated snow assistance requests by the
Governor of a State under the provisions of 44 CFR 206.35. Since
snowstorms are defined as ``major disasters'' in section 102(2) of the
Stafford Act, FEMA has determined that these events must be evaluated
under 44 CFR 206.36 before FEMA may provide snow assistance.
IV. Regulatory Requirements
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review
We have prepared and reviewed this notice of proposed policy under
the provisions of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review. Under Executive Order 12866, a significant regulatory action is
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the
requirements of the Executive Order. The Executive Order defines a
``significant regulatory action'' as one that is likely to result in a
rule that may:
(1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the
economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public
health and safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or
communities;
(2) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an
action taken or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budget impact of entitlements, grants,
user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof, or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in
the Executive Order.
This notice is a significant regulatory action, but not an
economically significant regulatory action within the definition of
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, and it adheres to the principles
of the Executive Order. OMB has reviewed this notice of proposed policy
under the provisions of the Executive Order.
Under the Stafford Act and 44 CFR 206.227, FEMA provides Federal
assistance for emergency or major disaster declarations based on snow
or blizzard conditions for cases of record or near-record snowstorms.
The current snow assistance policy evaluates States' requests for snow
assistance under the provisions of 44 CFR 206.35. This proposed policy
is intended to make snow assistance consistent with the Stafford Act,
which defines ``snowstorms'' as major disaster events under 42 U.S.C.
5122. See also, 44 CFR 206.2 (a)(17)(defining ``major disaster'' to
include snow storms). This proposed policy would require snowstorm
events to be evaluated under the provisions of 44 CFR 206.36.
It has been FEMA's practice to recommend an emergency declaration,
pursuant to 44 CFR 206.35, when a county has experienced a record or
near-record snowstorm that is of such severity and magnitude that
effective response is beyond the capability of the State and the
affected local governments. In view of the fact that snowstorms are
among the named natural events in the definition of a ``major
disaster'' in section 102(2) of the Stafford Act, 42 U.S.C. 5122, this
proposed policy would require that, in addition to record or near-
record snowfall, applicants for snow assistance meet the criteria for a
major disaster declaration in sections 44 CFR 206.36 and 44 CFR 206.48.
Over the last nine snow seasons (1998/1999 through 2006/2007) FEMA
has provided a total of $478,868,342 of snow assistance under 55
Presidential declarations for an average of approximately $53 million
per year.
[[Page 43248]]
FEMA assessed the potential economic impact of the proposed policy and
concluded that public assistance funding will be reduced by
approximately 10 percent per year under this proposed policy.
FEMA has considered a number of alternatives to this proposed
policy. One alternative would be to continue with the current policy,
which provides an emergency declaration for snow assistance. That
alternative is not consistent with the intent of the Stafford Act,
which defines a snowstorm as a ``major disaster.'' Continuing with the
current snow policy does not provide a method to evaluate snowfall data
as consistently as the proposed policy. By continuing to compare a
county's highest snowfall event data with the data from the NOAA
station with the lowest historical record snowfall, there would be no
change in the amount of assistance provided.
Another alternative would be to adopt only ``local impact''
criteria, but not require that States and counties meet the per capita
cost criteria (public assistance divided by State or county population)
for a major disaster declaration. If only ``local impact'' criteria
were required, the same level of financial assistance as the current
policy would be provided under the proposed policy.
Another alternative would be to eliminate snowstorms as a natural
disaster event qualifying for a Presidential disaster declaration and,
therefore, for our grant assistance. Such an alternative would be
contrary to the Stafford Act, which includes ``snowstorms'' in its
definition of types of major disasters eligible for FEMA assistance. As
a result, States and counties would not receive snow assistance from
FEMA as intended in the Stafford Act.
FEMA believes that the best alternative is presented in this
proposed policy, which includes per capita cost criteria and changing
the criteria for evaluating event snowfall to comparison with the NWS
station with the highest historical record in a county to determine a
true record or near-record snowfall event. Based on our analysis,
public assistance would be reduced by an average of 10 percent, or $5.3
million per year.
Accordingly, FEMA invites comments on the proposed Snow Assistance
and Severe Winter Storm Policy.
The policy reads as follows:
Text of Proposed Policy
Proposed Snow Assistance and Severe Winter Storm Policy
(a) Definitions.
Contiguous County means a county in the same State that shares a
common border with a core county without geographic separation other
than by a minor body of water, typically not exceeding one mile between
the land areas of such counties.
Core County means a county that has a record or near-record
snowfall with public assistance costs that exceed the per capita
threshold defined in FEMA Policy 9122.1 ``Designation of Counties for
Major Disaster Declarations'' and is designated for snow assistance
under a major disaster declaration.
Incident Period means the time span during which the disaster-
causing incident occurs, e.g., approximately 6:00 p.m., January 5,
2007, through 8:00 a.m., January 7, 2007.
Near-Record Snowfall means a snowfall that approaches, but does not
meet or exceed, the historical record snowfall within a county as
published by the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC). FEMA generally
considers snowfall within ten percent of the record amount to be a
near-record snowfall.
Record Snowfall means a snowfall that meets or exceeds the highest
record snowfall within a county over a 1-, 2-, 3-day or longer period
of time, as published by the NCDC.
Snow Assistance means assistance for all eligible activities under
Category B, emergency protective measures (see Categories of Work in
the Public Assistance Guide, FEMA 322, https://www.fema.gov/pdf/
government/grant/pa/pagprnt_071905.pdf) related to a snowstorm,
including snow removal, de-icing, salting, snow dumps, and sanding of
roads and other eligible facilities, as well as search and rescue,
sheltering, and other emergency protective measures.
Snowstorm means an event in which a State has record or near record
snowfall in one or more counties, as determined by paragraph (e), and
that overwhelms the capability of the affected State and local
governments to respond to the event. While snowstorms will normally
only receive Snow Assistance, other categories of supplemental Federal
assistance may be designated for a snowstorm declaration as warranted.
Severe Winter Storm means an event that occurs during the winter
season that includes one or more of the following conditions: Snow,
ice, high winds, blizzard conditions, and other wintry conditions; and
that causes substantial physical damage or loss to improved property.
(b) Snowstorm Declaration Criteria.
FEMA will only recommend a major disaster declaration to the
President in response to a snowstorm; an emergency declaration request
in response to a snowstorm will not be recommended to the President.
However, the criteria listed in this policy are solely for use by the
Agency in making recommendations to the President and in no manner
restrict the ability of the President, in his/her discretion, to
declare emergencies or major disasters pursuant to the Stafford Act.
A snowstorm that meets the following criteria may be designated a
major disaster under 44 CFR 206.36. In addition to the following county
criteria, a State must also meet the statewide per capita cost
threshold required by 44 CFR 206.48(a)(1) based on eligible public
assistance costs including the snow assistance costs it incurs within
the prescribed 48 hour period.
Each county included in a Governor's request for a declaration must
have a record or near-record snowfall, or meet the contiguous county
criteria described in this policy, have estimated public assistance
costs including snow assistance costs within a 48 hour period that
equal or exceed the county per capita cost threshold required for a
major disaster declaration, which is published annually in the Federal
Register (see 71 FR 59514, on October 10, 2006) and the State must
demonstrate that the capabilities of the State to effectively respond
to the event are or will be exceeded. An applicant may select a 48 hour
period for estimating purposes, but use a different 48 hour period when
submitting actual costs.
(c) Snowstorm Declaration Requests.
(1) Within 30-days following a record snowstorm, the Governor shall
submit a request for a snowstorm major disaster declaration that meets
the requirements of 44 CFR 206.36, 44 CFR 206.48, and this policy. A
Governor's request for a snowstorm major disaster declaration shall
cite ``Snowstorm'' as the incident type in the Governor's request, as
will the Regional Administrator's Regional Disaster Summary and the
Regional Analysis and Recommendation. Furthermore, the Governor's
request shall provide the following information:
(i) Overview of the event;
(ii) Core and contiguous counties for which a snowstorm declaration
is requested;
(iii) Date(s) of snowfall;
[[Page 43249]]
(iv) For each requested county, copies of event daily snowfall
totals from NWS stations and historical record snowfall data from the
NCDC to maintain consistency of evaluation data to determine when a
snowstorm reaches record or near-record proportions;
(v) A description of State and local resources activated in
response to the event;
(vi) The extent of search and rescue operations performed and
impacts to State and local government operations;
(vii) Any other localized impacts as described in 44 CFR
206.48(a)(2);
(viii) Total estimated eligible costs for each core and contiguous
county, including the estimated snow assistance costs for a 48 hour
period. The county per capita estimate of costs, which includes the
estimated eligible costs incurred by State agencies working within each
county, must meet or exceed the county per capita cost threshold; and
(ix) Total estimated statewide costs, which include the total of
estimated eligible costs for all counties requested. The per capita
estimate of statewide costs must meet the statewide per capita cost
threshold in 44 CFR 206.48(a)(1).
(2) The Regional Administrator of FEMA will evaluate the Governor's
request and make appropriate recommendations to the FEMA Assistant
Administrator of the Disaster Assistance Directorate.
(i) The Regional Disaster Summary (see Template at https://
declarations.fema.net/) should include:
(A) An overview of the snowstorm;
(B) A summary of statewide and localized impacts;
(C) A summary of State and local resources dedicated to alleviating
the emergency, to include shelter information;
(D) A comparison of actual event snowfall to the highest historical
record snowfall for each county for which snow assistance is requested;
and
(E) An identification of any extenuating circumstances.
(ii) The Regional Analysis and Recommendation (see Template at
https://declarations.fema.net/) should include:
(A) The recommended Incident Period of the event, and the
Categories of Work recommended (see Public Assistance Guide, FEMA 322,
page 44 (https://www.fema.gov/pdf/government/grant/pa/pagprnt_
071905.pdf);
(B) Confirmation that the Governor has taken appropriate action
under State law and directed the execution of the State emergency plan,
and that the Governor's request meets all statutory requirements;
(C) An evaluation of statewide and localized impacts;
(D) The type of assistance needed;
(E) A recommendation of a major disaster declaration for a State
that met the required statewide per capita cost threshold and the other
criteria; or a recommendation of denial of a major disaster declaration
for a State that did not meet the required statewide per capita cost
threshold or the other criteria; and
(F) A list of the recommended counties that met the requirements
for a major disaster declaration for snow assistance under this policy.
(3) The FEMA Administrator may add counties to a snowstorm
declaration after the President has declared a major disaster. Requests
for additional counties must meet the criteria for designation under
paragraph (b) of this policy and include the documentation required
under paragraph (c) of this policy. Such requests may be made within
30-days of the declaration, or the end of the incident period,
whichever is later.
(d) Use of Official Government Snowfall Data.
(1) Current Snowfall Data.
A Governor's request for a snowstorm major disaster declaration
shall include snowfall amounts measured and published by the National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) for the current snowstorm
for each county for which snow assistance is requested. The NCDC, which
is a part of NOAA, publishes snowfall data from measurements made by
observers who are part of the National Weather Service (NWS), airport
stations, and the NWS Cooperative Network. FEMA will rely primarily on
snowfall measurements taken at NWS Cooperative Network Stations, but in
cases where Cooperative Network Stations do not exist or do not report,
FEMA will accept snowfall measurements from other sources that have
been verified by the NCDC or NWS. A Governor's request for a snowstorm
major disaster declaration must include copies of all NCDC or NWS
Cooperative Network Station reports published for the counties for
which snow assistance is requested.
(2) Historical Snowfall Records. FEMA accepts historical snowfall
records maintained by NCDC. NCDC's Web site (see https://
www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/ncdc.html) provides snowfall amounts recorded at
NWS Cooperative Network Stations for single and multiple day events. If
NCDC data are not available or do not reflect snowfall records through
the previous year's snow season, such data should be obtained from
regional NWS offices and provided as part of the Regional Analysis and
Recommendation.
(e) Determining Record and Near-Record Snowfalls.
The following criteria will be used to determine record or near-
record snowfalls:
(1) Current snowfall amounts under paragraph (d)(1) of this policy
will be compared with the historical record snowfall amounts under
paragraph (d)(2) of this policy for a like number of days without
regard for the month in which the record snowfall or current event
occurred.
(2) For multiple day snowstorms, a county that meets the 1-day
record or near-record requirement on any one day, or the 2-day record
or near-record over two consecutive days, or the 3-day record or near-
record over three consecutive days, etc., will have met the record or
near-record criteria for that county.
(3) When data from multiple NWS Cooperative Network Stations exist
within a county, the highest current event snowfall reported by the NWS
within that county will be compared to the highest historical snowfall
record for that county.
(4) For counties that do not have NCDC or NWS historical record
snowfall data, the historical record from the nearest NWS Cooperative
Network Station in an adjacent county, even if located in an adjacent
State, may be used for determining historical snowfall records.
(5) If current event snowfall data under paragraph (d)(1) of this
policy are not available from the NWS for a county, the nearest NWS
Cooperative Network Station data from an adjacent county, even if
located in an adjacent State, may be used.
(6) A county that does not receive a record or near-record
snowfall, but is contiguous to a county that does receive a record or
near-record snowfall, may be designated for snow assistance if the
contiguous county has current event snowfall under paragraph (d)(1) of
this policy that meets or exceeds the current event snowfall under
paragraph (d)(1) of this policy of a county that has a record or near-
record snowfall. This comparison is based on the highest current event
snowfall received by each county as reported by the NWS.
(7) Counties that experience snowfalls occurring over a period
exceeding three consecutive days that do not reach record or near-
record snowfalls during a three-day period, and for which there are no
historical snowfall records for a period exceeding three days with NCDC
or NWS, will be considered for a major
[[Page 43250]]
disaster declaration on a case-by-case basis.
(f) Eligible Period of Assistance.
(1) Snow assistance is available for all ``eligible costs''
incurred over a continuous 48-hour period. Applicants may select a 48-
hour period during which the highest eligible costs were incurred. Once
costs are submitted for the chosen 48-hour period that selected 48-hour
period cannot be changed.
(2) The FEMA Assistant Administrator of the Disaster Assistance
Directorate may extend the eligible time period of assistance by 24
hours in counties where snowfall quantities greatly exceed record
amounts. To be eligible for a time extension, the current event
snowfall must exceed the historical record snowfall by at least 50
percent. The time period will be extended 24 hours for each designated
county that meets this 50 percent criterion.
(3) Different applicants in the same designated county may use
different 48-hour periods. However, all agencies or instrumentalities
of a local government must use the same 48-hour time period.
(4) A State agency, such as a Department of Transportation, that
provides snow assistance in multiple locations throughout the State,
may use different 48-hour periods.
(g) Eligible Applicants.
Entities that meet the applicant eligibility, 44 CFR 206.222, and
are performing work that meets the requirements of general work
eligibility, 44 CFR 206.223, are eligible for snow assistance.
(h) Eligible Work.
Eligible work, under Category B, emergency protective measures, as
described in the Public Assistance Guide, FEMA 322, (https://
www.fema.gov/pdf/government/grant/pa/pagprnt_071905.pdf) includes snow
removal, snow dumps, de-icing, salting, and sanding of roads and other
facilities essential to eliminate or lessen immediate threats to life,
public health, and safety. In addition, activities related to the
snowstorm such as search and rescue, sheltering, and other emergency
protective measures are eligible work. Other categories of work may be
eligible under a snowstorm declaration where appropriate.
(i) Eligible Costs.
FEMA will provide snow assistance during the 48-hour period for the
overtime but not the straight time cost of the applicant's regularly-
employed personnel. The cost of contract labor (including temporary
hires who perform eligible emergency work) is an eligible cost, as are
the costs for equipment and materials used in the performance of
eligible work. If applicants award contracts for periods greater than
the eligible period of assistance, eligible funding will be limited to
the costs incurred during the eligible period of assistance. The same
pro-rata method for calculating eligible funding applies to all other
eligible snow assistance costs.
(j) Insurance. It is the responsibility of an applicant to notify
the Regional Administrator of FEMA, through the State, of any actual or
anticipated proceeds from insurance covering snow removal or other snow
assistance costs. FEMA will deduct the actual or anticipated amount of
snow removal or other snow assistance cost insurance proceeds from
policies in force at the time of the snowfall.
(k) Severe Winter Storm Declarations.
(1) Severe Winter Storm declaration requests must satisfy the
requirements of 44 CFR 206.36 and 44 CFR 206.48, but are not required
to meet the record or near record snowfall requirements described under
paragraph (b) of this policy. FEMA will not include snow removal costs
when calculating the per capita cost impacts for a severe winter storm
declaration unless the county qualifies for snow assistance under
paragraph (b) of this policy.
(2) In a major disaster declaration for a Severe Winter Storm, snow
removal costs will not be eligible for FEMA assistance if the county
does not meet the requirements for snow assistance under paragraph (b)
of this policy. A limited level of snow removal incidental to disaster
response may be eligible for assistance. Generally, snow removal that
is necessary to perform otherwise eligible emergency work is eligible.
For example, snow removal necessary to access debris or to repair
downed power lines is eligible, while normal clearance of snow from
roads is not eligible.
(3) A Governor's request for a major disaster declaration as a
result of a Severe Winter Storm shall cite ``Severe Winter Storm'' as
the incident type in the Governor's request as will the Regional
Administrator's Regional Disaster Summary and the Regional Analysis and
Recommendation.
(4) The procedures for requesting and evaluating a Severe Winter
Storm declaration will follow the same process as any request for a
major disaster declaration as outlined in 44 CFR part 206 subpart B.
(5) The evaluation of current and historical snowfall data for the
designation of snow assistance, if warranted, will follow the same
procedures as described for snow assistance in this policy.
Dated: July 11, 2008.
R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E8-16866 Filed 7-23-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P