Almonds Grown in California; Relaxation of Incoming Quality Control Requirements, 43056-43058 [08-1465]
Download as PDF
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with RULES
43056
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 143 / Thursday, July 24, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
increasing the availability of this critical
information within the industry.
Regarding the impact of this action on
the affected entities, both large and
small entities are expected to benefit
from the changes, and the costs of
compliance are not expected to be
significantly different between large and
small entities.
This rule will not impose any
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large
nectarine and peach handlers. As with
all Federal marketing order programs,
reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information
requirements and duplication by
industry and public sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
In addition, as noted in the initial
regulatory flexibility analysis, USDA
has not identified any relevant Federal
rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict
with this rule.
Further, the committees’ meetings
were widely publicized throughout the
nectarine and peach industry and all
interested parties were invited to attend
the meetings and participate in
committee deliberations. Like all
committee meetings, the December 18,
2007, meetings were public meetings
and all entities, both large and small,
were able to express their views on this
issue.
Also, the committees have a number
of appointed subcommittees to review
certain issues and make
recommendations to the committees.
The committees’ Tree Fruit Quality
Subcommittee met on December 11,
2007, and discussed this issue in detail.
That meeting was also a public meeting
and both large and small entities were
able to participate and express their
views.
An interim final rule concerning this
action was published in the Federal
Register on March 18, 2008. Copies of
the rule were posted on the committees’
Web site. In addition, the rule was made
available through the Internet by USDA
and the Office of the Federal Register.
That rule provided a 60-day comment
period which ended May 19, 2008. One
comment was received from the
committees’ staff. The comment stated
that the trademark name for the
currently regulated Burpeachsixteen
variety had been established as ‘‘Spring
Flame 24.’’ Section 917.459(a)(6) has
been modified to include the new
trademark name.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:29 Jul 23, 2008
Jkt 214001
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at the following Web site:
https://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/
ams.fetchTemplateData.do
?template=TemplateN&page=Marketing
OrdersSmallBusinessGuide. Any
questions about the compliance guide
should be sent to Jay Guerber at the
previously mentioned address in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
committees’ recommendations, and
other information, it is found that
finalizing this interim final rule, with a
change, as published in the Federal
Register (73 FR 14372, March 18, 2008)
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
List of Subjects
7 CFR Part 916
Marketing agreements, Nectarines,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
7 CFR Part 917
Marketing agreements, Peaches, Pears,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
I Accordingly, the interim final rule
amending 7 CFR parts 916 and 917
which was published at 73 FR 14372 on
March 18, 2008, is adopted as a final
rule with the following change:
PART 917—FRESH PEARS AND
PEACHES GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for part 917
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Section 917.459 is amended by
revising the introductory text of
paragraph (a)(6) to read as follows:
I
§ 917.459 California peach grade and size
regulation.
*
*
*
*
*
(6) Any package or container of
August Lady, Autumn Flame, Autumn
Red, Autumn Rich, Autumn Rose,
Autumn Snow, Burpeachtwo (Henry
II), Burpeachthree (September
Flame), Burpeachfour (August
Flame), Burpeachfive (July Flame),
Burpeachsix (June Flame),
Burpeachseven (Summer Flame 29),
Burpeachfifteen (Summer Flame 34),
Burpeachsixteen (Spring Flame 24),
Burpeachtwenty (Summer Flame),
Burpeachtwentyone (Summer Flame
26), Candy Princess, Coral Princess,
Country Sweet, Diamond Princess,
Earlirich, Early Elegant Lady, Elegant
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Lady, Fancy Lady, Fay Elberta, Full
Moon, Galaxy, Glacier White, Henry III,
Henry IV, Ice Princess, Ivory Princess,
Jasper Flame, Jasper Treasure, Jillie
White, Joanna Sweet, John Henry,
Kaweah, Klondike, Last Tango, Natures
#10, O’Henry, Peach-N-Cream, Pink
Giant, Pink Moon, Prima Gattie 8, Prima
Peach 13, Prima Peach XV, Prima Peach
20, Prima Peach 23, Prima Peach XXVII,
Princess Gayle, Queen Jewel, Rich Lady,
Royal Lady, Ruby Queen, Ryan Sun,
Saturn (Donut), September Blaze,
September Snow, September Sun, Sierra
Gem, Sierra Rich, Snow Beauty, Snow
Blaze, Snow Fall, Snow Gem, Snow
Giant, Snow Jewel, Snow King, Snow
Magic, Snow Princess, Sprague Last
Chance, Spring Candy, Strawberry,
Sugar Crisp, Sugar Giant, Sugar Lady,
Summer Dragon, Summer Fling,
Summer Lady, Summer Sweet, Summer
Zee, Sweet Blaze, Sweet Dream, Sweet
Henry, Sweet Kay, Sweet September,
Tra Zee, Valley Sweet, Vista, White
Lady, or Zee Lady variety peaches
unless:
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: July 21, 2008.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. E8–16956 Filed 7–23–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 981
[Docket No. AMS–FV–08–0044; FV08–981–
1 IFR]
Almonds Grown in California;
Relaxation of Incoming Quality Control
Requirements
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Interim final rule with request
for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This rule relaxes the
incoming quality control requirements
prescribed under the California almond
marketing order (order). The order
regulates the handling of almonds
grown in California and is administered
locally by the Almond Board of
California (Board). This rule changes the
date by which almond handlers must
satisfy their inedible disposition
obligation from August 31 to September
30 of each year. This will provide
handlers more flexibility in their
operations in light of larger almond
crops.
E:\FR\FM\24JYR1.SGM
24JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 143 / Thursday, July 24, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Effective July 25, 2008;
comments received by September 22,
2008 will be considered prior to
issuance of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this rule. Comments must be
sent to the Docket Clerk, Marketing
Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., STOP
0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; Fax:
(202) 720–8938; or Internet: https://
www.regulations.gov. All comments
should reference the docket number and
the date and page number of this issue
of the Federal Register and will be
made available for public inspection in
the Office of the Docket Clerk during
regular business hours, or can be viewed
at: https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Terry Vawter, Senior Marketing
Specialist, or Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional
Manager, California Marketing Field
Office, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487–
5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906, or E-mail:
Terry.Vawter@usda.gov or
Kurt.Kimmel@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
is issued under Marketing Order No.
981, as amended (7 CFR part 981),
regulating the handling of almonds
grown in California, hereinafter referred
to as the ‘‘order.’’ The order is effective
under the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7
U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter referred to
as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This rule is not intended to
have retroactive effect. This rule will
not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they
present an irreconcilable conflict with
this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with RULES
DATES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:29 Jul 23, 2008
Jkt 214001
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. A handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing, USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule relaxes the incoming quality
control requirements prescribed under
the order. This rule changes the date by
which almond handlers must satisfy
their inedible disposition obligation
from August 31 to September 30 of each
year. This will provide handlers more
flexibility in their operations in light of
larger almond crops.
Section 981.42 of the order provides
authority for a quality control program.
Paragraph (a) of this section requires
handlers to obtain incoming inspections
on almonds received from growers to
determine the percent of inedible
kernels in each lot of any variety.
Inedible kernels are poor quality kernels
or pieces of kernels as defined in
§ 981.408. A handler’s inedible
disposition obligation is based on the
percentage of inedible kernels in lots
received by such handler during a crop
year, as determined by the Federal-State
inspection service. Handlers must
satisfy their obligation by disposing of
inedible kernels and other almond
material in Board-accepted, non-human
consumption outlets like oil and animal
feed. Section 981.42(a) also provides
authority for the Board, with approval of
the Secretary, to establish rules and
regulations necessary to administer this
program.
Section 981.442(a)(5) of the order’s
administrative rules and regulations
currently specifies that handlers must
satisfy their inedible disposition
obligation no later than August 31
succeeding the crop year in which the
obligation was incurred. The crop year
runs from August 1 through July 31.
Since the mid-1990s, almond crops
have doubled in size and are now over
1 billion pounds annually. Larger crops
have resulted in larger quantities of
inedible kernels. Between the 1993–94
and 1997–98 crop years, almond
production averaged about 570 million
pounds and inedible disposition
obligations averaged about 7 million
pounds annually. Between the 2003–04
and 2007–08 crop years, production
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
43057
averaged about 1 billion pounds and
inedible disposition obligations
averaged about 10 million pounds
annually.
Many handlers now operate yearround and dispose of their inedible
kernels at one time after the end of the
crop year. With larger crops, it has
become difficult for handlers to meet
the August 31 inedible-disposition
deadline because of the larger volume of
inedible kernels that must be disposed
of under the program. Thus, the Board
recommended extending the deadline
from August 31 to September 30, giving
handlers an additional month to meet
their prior year’s obligation. This will
provide handlers more flexibility in
their operations in light of larger
almond crops. Section 981.442(a)(5) is
revised accordingly.
This rule also removes obsolete
language in § 981.442(a)(5). That section
was modified in 2006 to specify that at
least 50 percent (increased from 25
percent) of a handler’s crop year
inedible disposition obligation must be
satisfied with dispositions consisting of
inedible kernels. The 50 percent
requirement does not apply to handlers
with total inedible obligations of less
than 1,000 pounds. However, that
section still contains the sentence
referencing the 25 percent requirement.
This rule removes that sentence and
revises § 981.442(a)(5) accordingly.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of
this action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this
initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are approximately 6,200
producers of almonds in the production
area and approximately 100 handlers
subject to regulation under the
marketing order. Small agricultural
producers are defined by the Small
Business Administration (13 CFR
121.201) as those having annual receipts
of less than $750,000, and small
agricultural service firms are defined as
those whose annual receipts are less
than $6,500,000.
E:\FR\FM\24JYR1.SGM
24JYR1
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with RULES
43058
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 143 / Thursday, July 24, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Data for the most recently-completed
crop year indicate that about 50 percent
of the handlers shipped under
$6,500,000 worth of almonds. Dividing
average almond crop value for 2006–07
reported by the National Agricultural
Statistics Service of $2.258 billion by
the number of producers (6,200) yields
an average annual producer revenue
estimate of about $364,190. Based on
the foregoing, about half of the handlers
and a majority of almond producers may
be classified as small entities.
This rule revises and relaxes
§ 981.442(a)(5) of the order’s
administrative rules and regulations,
whereby handlers will be permitted to
satisfy their inedible disposition
obligation no later than September 30 of
each year for obligations incurred in the
previous crop year, rather than the
current deadline of August 31 of each
year. This rule also removes an obsolete
sentence in that section that references
handler dispositions containing 25
percent inedible kernels. Authority for
this action is provided in § 981.42(a) of
the order.
Regarding the impact of this action on
affected entities, extending the
disposition deadline will provide
handlers with additional flexibility in
light of larger almond crops. Handlers
who operate year round and dispose of
their inedible kernels at one time after
the end of the crop year will have an
additional month to satisfy their prior
year’s inedible obligation.
The Board considered alternatives to
this action. The Board’s Food Quality
and Safety Committee (committee) met
in September and November 2007 and
discussed the difficulties that handlers
were experiencing with meeting the
August 31 disposition deadline. The
committee recommended revising the
regulation to allow July dispositions to
be counted towards either the current
year or the following year’s obligation.
However, the intent of the inedible
program is to ensure that poor quality
almonds from the current crop year are
removed from the market. Thus,
allowing July dispositions to count
towards the following year’s obligation
would not meet the intent of the
program.
The committee deliberated on this
issue again in April 2008. The
committee considered the option of
extending the August 31 deadline to
September 30. The Board concurred
with this option at its meeting on April
2, 2008, and referred the issue back to
the committee for full discussion. The
committee met again on April 22, 2008,
to discuss the potential change.
Ultimately, the committee
recommended this option to the Board,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:29 Jul 23, 2008
Jkt 214001
and the Board unanimously
recommended this change at its May
2008 meeting.
This rule will not impose any
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large
almond handlers. As with all Federal
marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to
reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
In addition, USDA has not identified
any relevant Federal rules that
duplicate, overlap or conflict with this
rule.
Further, the committee and Board
meetings where this issue was discussed
were widely publicized throughout the
almond industry and all interested
persons were invited to attend the
meetings and encouraged to participate
in Board deliberations. Like all
committee and Board meetings, the
meetings held in September and
November 2007, and in April and May
2008 were all public meetings and all
entities, both large and small, were able
to express their views on this issue.
Finally, interested persons are invited to
submit comments on this interim final
rule, including the regulatory and
informational impacts of this action on
small businesses.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
AMSv1.0/ams.fetchTemplate
Data.do?template=TemplateN&page=
MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Jay Guerber at
the previously mentioned address in the
tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also
found and determined upon good cause
that it is impracticable, unnecessary,
and contrary to the public interest to
give preliminary notice prior to putting
this rule into effect and that good cause
exists for not postponing the effective
date of this rule until 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register
because: (1) This rule should be in place
as soon as possible so that handlers can
act accordingly; (2) the Board
unanimously recommended this change
at a public meeting, and interested
parties had an opportunity to provide
input; (3) this rule relaxes the current
rules and regulations; and (4) this rule
provides a 60-day comment period and
any comments received will be
considered prior to finalization of this
rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 981
Almonds, Marketing agreements,
Nuts, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
I For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 981 is amended as
follows:
PART 981—ALMONDS GROWN IN
CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 981 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. In § 981.442, paragraph (a)(5) the
words ‘‘At least 25 percent of a
handler’s total crop year inedible
disposition obligation shall be satisfied
with dispositions consisting of inedible
kernels as defined in § 981.408:
Provided, That this 25 percent
requirement shall not apply to handlers
with total annual obligations of less
than 1,000 pounds.’’ are removed and
the last sentence is revised to read as
follows:
I
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
§ 981.442
section.
This rule invites comments on
relaxing the quality control
requirements currently prescribed under
the California almond marketing order.
This rule extends the date by which
handlers must satisfy their inedible
disposition obligation from August 31 to
September 30 of each year. Any
comments received will be considered
prior to finalization of this rule.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
Board’s recommendation, and other
information, it is found that this interim
final rule, as hereinafter set forth, will
(a) * * *
(5) * * * Each handler’s disposition
obligation shall be satisfied when the
almond meat content of the material
delivered to accepted users equals the
disposition obligation, but no later than
September 30 succeeding the crop year
in which the obligation was incurred.
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Quality control.
Dated: July 22, 2008.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 08–1465 Filed 7–22–08; 12:26 pm]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
E:\FR\FM\24JYR1.SGM
24JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 143 (Thursday, July 24, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 43056-43058]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-1465]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 981
[Docket No. AMS-FV-08-0044; FV08-981-1 IFR]
Almonds Grown in California; Relaxation of Incoming Quality
Control Requirements
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Interim final rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule relaxes the incoming quality control requirements
prescribed under the California almond marketing order (order). The
order regulates the handling of almonds grown in California and is
administered locally by the Almond Board of California (Board). This
rule changes the date by which almond handlers must satisfy their
inedible disposition obligation from August 31 to September 30 of each
year. This will provide handlers more flexibility in their operations
in light of larger almond crops.
[[Page 43057]]
DATES: Effective July 25, 2008; comments received by September 22, 2008
will be considered prior to issuance of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning this rule. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk,
Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC
20250-0237; Fax: (202) 720-8938; or Internet: https://
www.regulations.gov. All comments should reference the docket number
and the date and page number of this issue of the Federal Register and
will be made available for public inspection in the Office of the
Docket Clerk during regular business hours, or can be viewed at: http:/
/www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Terry Vawter, Senior Marketing
Specialist, or Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional Manager, California Marketing
Field Office, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax: (559)
487-5906, or E-mail: Terry.Vawter@usda.gov or Kurt.Kimmel@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202)
720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail: Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing Order
No. 981, as amended (7 CFR part 981), regulating the handling of
almonds grown in California, hereinafter referred to as the ``order.''
The order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the
``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect.
This rule will not preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or
policies, unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this
rule.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule relaxes the incoming quality control requirements
prescribed under the order. This rule changes the date by which almond
handlers must satisfy their inedible disposition obligation from August
31 to September 30 of each year. This will provide handlers more
flexibility in their operations in light of larger almond crops.
Section 981.42 of the order provides authority for a quality
control program. Paragraph (a) of this section requires handlers to
obtain incoming inspections on almonds received from growers to
determine the percent of inedible kernels in each lot of any variety.
Inedible kernels are poor quality kernels or pieces of kernels as
defined in Sec. 981.408. A handler's inedible disposition obligation
is based on the percentage of inedible kernels in lots received by such
handler during a crop year, as determined by the Federal-State
inspection service. Handlers must satisfy their obligation by disposing
of inedible kernels and other almond material in Board-accepted, non-
human consumption outlets like oil and animal feed. Section 981.42(a)
also provides authority for the Board, with approval of the Secretary,
to establish rules and regulations necessary to administer this
program.
Section 981.442(a)(5) of the order's administrative rules and
regulations currently specifies that handlers must satisfy their
inedible disposition obligation no later than August 31 succeeding the
crop year in which the obligation was incurred. The crop year runs from
August 1 through July 31.
Since the mid-1990s, almond crops have doubled in size and are now
over 1 billion pounds annually. Larger crops have resulted in larger
quantities of inedible kernels. Between the 1993-94 and 1997-98 crop
years, almond production averaged about 570 million pounds and inedible
disposition obligations averaged about 7 million pounds annually.
Between the 2003-04 and 2007-08 crop years, production averaged about 1
billion pounds and inedible disposition obligations averaged about 10
million pounds annually.
Many handlers now operate year-round and dispose of their inedible
kernels at one time after the end of the crop year. With larger crops,
it has become difficult for handlers to meet the August 31 inedible-
disposition deadline because of the larger volume of inedible kernels
that must be disposed of under the program. Thus, the Board recommended
extending the deadline from August 31 to September 30, giving handlers
an additional month to meet their prior year's obligation. This will
provide handlers more flexibility in their operations in light of
larger almond crops. Section 981.442(a)(5) is revised accordingly.
This rule also removes obsolete language in Sec. 981.442(a)(5).
That section was modified in 2006 to specify that at least 50 percent
(increased from 25 percent) of a handler's crop year inedible
disposition obligation must be satisfied with dispositions consisting
of inedible kernels. The 50 percent requirement does not apply to
handlers with total inedible obligations of less than 1,000 pounds.
However, that section still contains the sentence referencing the 25
percent requirement. This rule removes that sentence and revises Sec.
981.442(a)(5) accordingly.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the
economic impact of this action on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 6,200 producers of almonds in the
production area and approximately 100 handlers subject to regulation
under the marketing order. Small agricultural producers are defined by
the Small Business Administration (13 CFR 121.201) as those having
annual receipts of less than $750,000, and small agricultural service
firms are defined as those whose annual receipts are less than
$6,500,000.
[[Page 43058]]
Data for the most recently-completed crop year indicate that about
50 percent of the handlers shipped under $6,500,000 worth of almonds.
Dividing average almond crop value for 2006-07 reported by the National
Agricultural Statistics Service of $2.258 billion by the number of
producers (6,200) yields an average annual producer revenue estimate of
about $364,190. Based on the foregoing, about half of the handlers and
a majority of almond producers may be classified as small entities.
This rule revises and relaxes Sec. 981.442(a)(5) of the order's
administrative rules and regulations, whereby handlers will be
permitted to satisfy their inedible disposition obligation no later
than September 30 of each year for obligations incurred in the previous
crop year, rather than the current deadline of August 31 of each year.
This rule also removes an obsolete sentence in that section that
references handler dispositions containing 25 percent inedible kernels.
Authority for this action is provided in Sec. 981.42(a) of the order.
Regarding the impact of this action on affected entities, extending
the disposition deadline will provide handlers with additional
flexibility in light of larger almond crops. Handlers who operate year
round and dispose of their inedible kernels at one time after the end
of the crop year will have an additional month to satisfy their prior
year's inedible obligation.
The Board considered alternatives to this action. The Board's Food
Quality and Safety Committee (committee) met in September and November
2007 and discussed the difficulties that handlers were experiencing
with meeting the August 31 disposition deadline. The committee
recommended revising the regulation to allow July dispositions to be
counted towards either the current year or the following year's
obligation. However, the intent of the inedible program is to ensure
that poor quality almonds from the current crop year are removed from
the market. Thus, allowing July dispositions to count towards the
following year's obligation would not meet the intent of the program.
The committee deliberated on this issue again in April 2008. The
committee considered the option of extending the August 31 deadline to
September 30. The Board concurred with this option at its meeting on
April 2, 2008, and referred the issue back to the committee for full
discussion. The committee met again on April 22, 2008, to discuss the
potential change. Ultimately, the committee recommended this option to
the Board, and the Board unanimously recommended this change at its May
2008 meeting.
This rule will not impose any additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large almond handlers. As with all
Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information requirements and duplication by industry
and public sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
In addition, USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap or conflict with this rule.
Further, the committee and Board meetings where this issue was
discussed were widely publicized throughout the almond industry and all
interested persons were invited to attend the meetings and encouraged
to participate in Board deliberations. Like all committee and Board
meetings, the meetings held in September and November 2007, and in
April and May 2008 were all public meetings and all entities, both
large and small, were able to express their views on this issue.
Finally, interested persons are invited to submit comments on this
interim final rule, including the regulatory and informational impacts
of this action on small businesses.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: http:/
/www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/
ams.fetchTemplateData.do?template=TemplateN&page=MarketingOrdersSmallBus
inessGuide. Any questions about the compliance guide should be sent to
Jay Guerber at the previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
This rule invites comments on relaxing the quality control
requirements currently prescribed under the California almond marketing
order. This rule extends the date by which handlers must satisfy their
inedible disposition obligation from August 31 to September 30 of each
year. Any comments received will be considered prior to finalization of
this rule.
After consideration of all relevant material presented, including
the Board's recommendation, and other information, it is found that
this interim final rule, as hereinafter set forth, will tend to
effectuate the declared policy of the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also found and determined upon good
cause that it is impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to the public
interest to give preliminary notice prior to putting this rule into
effect and that good cause exists for not postponing the effective date
of this rule until 30 days after publication in the Federal Register
because: (1) This rule should be in place as soon as possible so that
handlers can act accordingly; (2) the Board unanimously recommended
this change at a public meeting, and interested parties had an
opportunity to provide input; (3) this rule relaxes the current rules
and regulations; and (4) this rule provides a 60-day comment period and
any comments received will be considered prior to finalization of this
rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 981
Almonds, Marketing agreements, Nuts, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 981 is amended as
follows:
PART 981--ALMONDS GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 981 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
0
2. In Sec. 981.442, paragraph (a)(5) the words ``At least 25 percent
of a handler's total crop year inedible disposition obligation shall be
satisfied with dispositions consisting of inedible kernels as defined
in Sec. 981.408: Provided, That this 25 percent requirement shall not
apply to handlers with total annual obligations of less than 1,000
pounds.'' are removed and the last sentence is revised to read as
follows:
Sec. 981.442 Quality control.
(a) * * *
(5) * * * Each handler's disposition obligation shall be satisfied
when the almond meat content of the material delivered to accepted
users equals the disposition obligation, but no later than September 30
succeeding the crop year in which the obligation was incurred.
* * * * *
Dated: July 22, 2008.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 08-1465 Filed 7-22-08; 12:26 pm]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P