Directory of State and Local Officials and State Food Safety Resource Survey Support Project, 42814-42816 [E8-16818]
Download as PDF
42814
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 23, 2008 / Notices
including gaining feedback on the flow
of items and their relevance to the
respondents’ experience, assessing the
effectiveness of the questionnaire
instructions, and obtaining
recommendations for improving the
questions. Data captured in the pretest
were used to identify areas for
questionnaire improvement and
recommendations for maximizing the
performance of the full survey.
The proposed survey will be based
upon a probability sample of
approximately 300 of the 675
underground coal mines in the United
States. A stratified random sample of
mines will be drawn to ensure
representativeness on important
dimensions such as mine size and
region of the country. Sampling a large
proportion of the underground coal
mines will ensure low rates of sampling
error and increase confidence in the
resulting survey estimates. Oversampling some kinds of mines, such as
those operating longwall sections, will
be necessary to ensure enough cases are
available to conduct meaningful
analysis of these mine types.
Allowing mine operators to complete
the survey using the method they find
convenient is expected to enhance the
overall response rate. Therefore, both a
Web-based and a print version of the
questionnaire will be provided to
sampled respondents. Mine operators
unable to complete the survey through
one of these two methods will be
contacted and asked to complete the
survey over the telephone. Using these
multiple methods of administration,
NIOSH expects to achieve an 80% rate
of response to the survey. An additional
method that will be used to reduce the
overall burden on respondents will be to
collect certain types of supplementary
information (e.g., the mine’s dates of
operation, annual coal production) on
each sampled mine from publiclyavailable data collected by the Mine
Safety and Health Administration
(MSHA).
Once the study is completed, NIOSH
will provide a copy of the final report
to each sampled mining operation, and
use the survey data to improve the
adoption of important safety and health
practices throughout the coal mine
industry. NIOSH expects to complete
data collection in the spring of 2009.
There is no cost to respondents other
than their time.
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN TABLE
Responding eligible coal mine operators ........................................
Dated: July 10, 2008.
Maryam Danneshvar,
Acting Reports Clearance Officer, Office of
the Chief Science Officer, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E8–16862 Filed 7–22–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2008–N–0362]
Directory of State and Local Officials
and State Food Safety Resource
Survey Support Project
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA), Office of
Regulatory Affairs (ORA), Division of
Federal-State Relations (DFSR) is
announcing the availability of a Sole
Source to the Association of Food and
Drug Officials (AFDO) to provide
funding for a 3-year cooperative
agreement award to support a Special
Project Cooperative Agreement program.
No other applications are solicited. This
cooperative agreement is intended to
have AFDO update and maintain the
FDA Directory of State and Local
Officials and to update the AFDO
document ‘‘State Food Safety Resource
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:14 Jul 22, 2008
Jkt 214001
Number of
responses per
respondent
Number of
respondents
Respondents
240
Survey (2000)’’ by providing funding for
additional personnel, equipment, and
supplies to support activities related to
these projects.
DATES: Receipt Date: Applications are
due within 30 days after the publication
of the funding opportunity in the
Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
issues regarding the administrative and
financial management aspects of this
notice: Marc Pitts, Division of
Acquisition Support and Grants, Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301–827–
7162, e-mail: Marc.Pitts@fda.hhs.gov.
For issues regarding the
programmatic or technical aspects of
this notice: Jennifer Gabb, Division of
Federal-State Relations (HFC–150),
Office of Regulatory Affairs, Food and
Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 12–07, Rockville, MD 20857,
301–827–2899, e-mail:
jennifer.gabb@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Announcement Type: New Cooperative
Agreement (U18)
Request for Applications (RFA) Number:
FD–08–011 Sole Source
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Number: 93.103
In 2007 and 2008, the Food and Drug
Administration Amendments Act of
2007 (FDAAA), the Food Protection
Plan, and the Import Strategic Action
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Average burden
per response
(in hours)
1
30/60
Total burden
hours
120
Plan addressed FDA’s relationship with
the States in food protection activities.
In addition, the Food Protection Plan
lays out new goals specific to protecting
the food supply and responding to
incidents in a rapid and coordinated
manner.
A. Food Protection Plan 2007
In May 2007, the Secretary of Health
and Human Services and the
Commissioner of Food and Drugs
charged FDA with developing a
comprehensive and integrated Food
Protection Plan to keep the nation’s food
supply safe from both unintentional and
deliberate contamination. Driven by
science and modern information
technology, the Food Protection Plan
aims to identify potential hazards and
counter them before they can do harm.
A cornerstone of this forward-thinking
effort is an increased focus on
prevention.
B. Project Emphasis
FDA’s integrated approach within the
Food Protection Plan encompasses three
core elements: Prevention, intervention
and response.
Core Element 1: Prevention
The prevention element involves
promoting increased corporate
responsibility so that food problems do
not occur in the first place. By
comprehensively reviewing food supply
vulnerabilities and developing and
implementing risk reduction measures
E:\FR\FM\23JYN1.SGM
23JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 23, 2008 / Notices
with industry and other stakeholders,
we can best address critical weaknesses.
Core Element 2: Intervention
The intervention element focuses on
risk-based inspections, sampling, and
surveillance at high-risk points in the
food supply chain. These interventions
must verify that the preventive
measures are being implemented and
implemented correctly.
Core Element 3: Response
The response element bolsters FDA’s
emergency response efforts by allowing
for increased speed and efficiency. This
element also includes the idea of better
communication with other Federal,
State, and local government agencies
and industry during and after
emergencies. Whether contamination is
unintentional or deliberate, there is a
need to respond quickly and to
communicate clearly with consumers
and other stakeholders. The
communication should emphasize
identifying products of concern as well
as informing the public of what is safe
to consume.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
C. Food and Drug Administration
Amendments Act of 2007
Under the Food and Drug
Administration Amendment Act of 2007
(FDAAA), FDA is required to work with
the states to improve food safety.
Section 1004 of the FDAAA states:
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL—The Secretary
shall work with the States in
undertaking activities and programs that
assist in improving the safety of food,
including fresh and processed produce,
so that State food safety programs and
activities conducted by the Secretary
function in a coordinated and costeffective manner. With the assistance
provided under subsection (b), the
Secretary shall encourage States to—
(1) establish, continue, or strengthen
State food safety programs, especially
with respect to the regulation of retail
commercial food establishments; and
(2) establish procedures and
requirements for ensuring that
processed produce under the
jurisdiction of State food safety
programs is not unsafe for human
consumption.’’
D. Import Safety Action Plan
The Import Safety Action Plan (ISAP)
acknowledges the value of mutual
leveraging of State and Federal
resources and recommends
consideration of cooperative agreements
to increase information sharing.
Specifically, the ISAP provides the
following recommendations:
Federal-State Rapid Response
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:14 Jul 22, 2008
Jkt 214001
Recommendation 12—Maximize
Federal-State Collaboration
The roles of and the resources used by
the Federal Government and the States
in import safety are complementary.
States possess legislative authority and
resources to respond to unsafe imported
products within their jurisdiction. The
Federal Government can take steps to
interdict unsafe imported goods at ports
of entry. Should an unsafe product enter
domestic commerce, federal
departments and agencies often work
with State authorities to track it down,
seize it, notify the public if it has
already been purchased by consumers,
and impose appropriate penalties on
domestic entities who violate U.S. law.
Also, both the Federal Government and
States may have access to information
relevant to protecting consumers that
the other does not possess. For example,
Federal departments and agencies may
have relevant information about the
foreign source of the imported product
and about the importer. This
information can help State officials
track down an unsafe imported product
within their jurisdiction. On the other
hand, State officials may identify an
unsafe imported product during
transport or at the point of sale, if the
product does get into the country, and
can tip off Federal officials to prevent
future shipments from entering
domestic commerce.
Several Federal departments and
agencies already collaborate closely
with State authorities to protect
consumers. For example, FDA has
contracts and cooperative agreements
with State Governments to share
information, conduct joint inspections,
and collaborate on laboratory analyses.
Greater mutual leveraging of State and
Federal resources can further enhance
consumer protection.
Recommendation 12.1 states:
‘‘Consider cooperative agreements
between the federal inspection agencies
and their state counterparts for greater
information-sharing.’’ Such cooperative
agreements would not infringe on the
statutory authorities of Federal or State
regulators and would encourage a
coordinated effort that would result in
a more rapid and effective response.
Establishing clear procedures and points
of contact for information sharing and
joint enforcement efforts can further
enhance the effectiveness of FederalState actions to limit exposure and
potential harm to consumers if an
unsafe imported product enters
domestic commerce.
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
42815
II. Award Information
Mechanism of Support
Support will be in the form of a Sole
Source cooperative agreement U18
Mechanism. Substantive involvement
by the awarding agency is inherent in
the cooperative agreement award.
Accordingly, FDA will have substantial
involvement in the program activities of
the project funded by the cooperative
agreement.
III. Eligibility Information
A. Eligible Applicants
ORA is offering this sole source
cooperative agreement to AFDO to
improve and update the Directory of
State and Local Officials (current
version is from 2004) to provide
information for Rapid Response and
information sharing. AFDO will also
update the data in the AFDO State Food
Safety Resource Survey including recall
and foodborne illness investigation
information to identify and to support
Risk Management and information
sharing. Assistance will be provided
only to the AFDO. No other applications
are solicited.
B. Applicability
AFDO is uniquely qualified for this
cooperative agreement. AFDO (https://
www.afdo.org/) conducted a nationwide
survey of State and local food safety
programs in 2000 and, with the National
Center for Food Protection and Defense,
has been an active partner in the
FoodSHIELD project (https://
www.afdo.org/afdo/upload/061025–
FoodSHIELD%20Brochure.pdf, https://
www.foodshield.org/), during which
AFDO has collected contact information
of State and local jurisdictions
comparable to the FDA Directory of
State and Local Officials (https://
www.fda.gov/ora/fed_state/
directorytable.htm). AFDO is the
organization qualified for conducting
this work because:
• AFDO is the only national
organization that represents the State
and local food protection regulatory
agencies. AFDO’s principal purpose is
to act as a leader and a resource to State
and local regulatory agencies in
developing strategies to resolve and
promote public health and consumer
protection related to the regulation of
foods, drugs, medical devices, and
consumer products. Regular members
are officials of State and local regulatory
agencies that administer these programs
in conjunction and collaboration with
FDA.
• AFDO has always focused on the
administration of the nation’s food
E:\FR\FM\23JYN1.SGM
23JYN1
42816
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 23, 2008 / Notices
protection programs. Thus, unlike other
organizations, AFDO has a unique
perspective on the infrastructure,
capacity, strengths, and needs of State
and local food protection programs.
• AFDO has successful experience in
carrying out national efforts that focus
on the needs of State and local
regulatory agencies. FDA has used the
data from the initial AFDO State Food
Safety Resource Survey, AFDO model
codes, and training programs such as
the Seafood HACCP training program
certified through AFDO. AFDO has also
developed the AFDO Recall Manual and
many other training programs and
initiatives with the Centers for Disease
Control, the U.S. Department of
Agriculture, and others in meat and
poultry processing at retail. AFDO also
has industry associate members.
C. Award Amount
The total amount of funding available
for fiscal years 2008 through 2010 is
$250,000. This cooperative agreement
will award up to $250,000 in total
(direct plus indirect) costs for a 3-year
cooperative agreement.
D. Length of Support
The length of support for this project
will be 3 years.
E. Cost Sharing or Matching
Cost sharing is not required.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
IV. Application and Submission
A. Application Information
Applications must be prepared using
the most current SF424 (Research and
Related) (also referred to as the ‘‘SF424
(R&R)’’, which is part of the Public
Health Service, PHS 5161–1 form.
Applications must have a Dun and
Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering
System (DUNS) number as the universal
identifier when applying for Federal
grants or cooperative agreements. The
DUNS number can be obtained by
calling 866–705–5711 or through the
Web site at https://www.dnb.com/us/.
(FDA has verified the Web site
addresses throughout this document,
but we are not responsible for any
subsequent changes to the Web sites
after this document publishes in the
Federal Register.)
Applications must be prepared using
the forms found in the SF424 R&R
instructions for preparing a nonmodular
research grant application. Submit a
signed, typewritten original of the paper
application, including the checklist,
three signed photocopies, and appendix
material in one package to: Marc Pitts
(see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
If you experience technical
difficulties with your online
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:14 Jul 22, 2008
Jkt 214001
submission, you should contact either
Marc Pitts (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT), or the Grants.gov
Customer Support Center by e-mail at
support@grants.gov or by phone at 1–
800–518–4726.
Information collection requirements
requested on Form (SF–424) PHS 5161–
1, expiration date of January 31, 2009,
have been sent by the PHS to the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) and
have been approved and assigned OMB
control number OS–4040–0004.
B. Submission Dates and Times
The application receipt date is 30
days after the publication of the funding
opportunity in the Federal Register.
Applications will be accepted from 8
a.m. to 4:30 p.m. e.s.t., Monday through
Friday, until the established receipt
date. Applications submitted
electronically must be received by the
close of business on the established
receipt date. No addendum material will
be accepted after the established receipt
date.
C. Intergovernmental Review
The regulations issued under
Executive Order 12372,
Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs (45 CFR part 100) apply.
Applicants (other than federally
recognized tribal governments) should
contact the State’s Single Point of
Contact (SPOC) as early as possible to
alert the SPOC to the prospective
application(s) and to receive any
necessary instructions on the State’s
review process. A current listing of
SPOCs is located at http//
www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants/
spoc.html. The SPOC should send any
State review process recommendations
to the FDA administrative contact (see
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). The
due date for the State process
recommendations is no later than 60
days after the application receipt date.
FDA does not guarantee accommodation
or explanation of SPOC comments that
are received after the 60-day cutoff.
D. Funding Restrictions
This cooperative agreement is not to
fund annual, regional, or State meetings
of AFDO, travel for other than project
employees, equipment other than
consumables or as outlined in the
application, or any remodeling or
capital improvement to office location
or space.
E. Central Contractor Registration
Applicants must register with the
Central Contractor Registration (CCR)
database. This database is a governmentwide warehouse of commercial and
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
financial information for all
organizations conducting business with
the Federal Government. Registration
with CCR is a mandatory requirement
and is consistent with the governmentwide management reform to create a
citizen-centered Web presence and to
build e-gov infrastructures in and across
agencies to establish a ‘‘single face to
industry.’’ The preferred method for
completing a registration is through the
World Wide Web at https://www.ccr.gov.
This Web site provides a CCR handbook
with detailed information on data you
will need prior to beginning the online
preregistration, as well as steps to walk
you through the registration process.
You must have a DUNS number to begin
your registration. The CCR registration
process can also be found under the
‘‘Organization Registration’’ page of
Grants.gov at https://www.grants.gov/
applicants/organization_
registration.jsp.
F. Copyright Material
Applicant and applicants’ subgrantees
and subcontractors must ensure that any
projects developed in whole or in part
with Federal funds may be made
available to other State, territorial, local,
and tribal regulatory agencies by FDA or
its agents. Any copyrighted or
copyrightable works shall be subject to
a royalty-free, nonexclusive, and
irrevocable license to the Federal
Government to reproduce, publish, or
otherwise use them, and to authorize
others to do so for Federal Government
purposes.
Dated: July 15, 2008.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and
Planning.
[FR Doc. E8–16818 Filed 7–22–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2008–N–0359]
Food Safety and Security Monitoring
Project
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA), Office of
Regulatory Affairs (ORA), Division of
Federal-State Relations (DFSR), is
announcing the availability of
cooperative agreements for equipment,
supplies, personnel, training, and
facility upgrades to Food Emergency
E:\FR\FM\23JYN1.SGM
23JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 142 (Wednesday, July 23, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42814-42816]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-16818]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2008-N-0362]
Directory of State and Local Officials and State Food Safety
Resource Survey Support Project
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Office of Regulatory
Affairs (ORA), Division of Federal-State Relations (DFSR) is announcing
the availability of a Sole Source to the Association of Food and Drug
Officials (AFDO) to provide funding for a 3-year cooperative agreement
award to support a Special Project Cooperative Agreement program. No
other applications are solicited. This cooperative agreement is
intended to have AFDO update and maintain the FDA Directory of State
and Local Officials and to update the AFDO document ``State Food Safety
Resource Survey (2000)'' by providing funding for additional personnel,
equipment, and supplies to support activities related to these
projects.
DATES: Receipt Date: Applications are due within 30 days after the
publication of the funding opportunity in the Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For issues regarding the
administrative and financial management aspects of this notice: Marc
Pitts, Division of Acquisition Support and Grants, Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-7162,
e-mail: Marc.Pitts@fda.hhs.gov.
For issues regarding the programmatic or technical aspects of this
notice: Jennifer Gabb, Division of Federal-State Relations (HFC-150),
Office of Regulatory Affairs, Food and Drug Administration, 5600
Fishers Lane, Rm. 12-07, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-2899, e-mail:
jennifer.gabb@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Announcement Type: New Cooperative Agreement (U18)
Request for Applications (RFA) Number: FD-08-011 Sole Source
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 93.103
In 2007 and 2008, the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act
of 2007 (FDAAA), the Food Protection Plan, and the Import Strategic
Action Plan addressed FDA's relationship with the States in food
protection activities. In addition, the Food Protection Plan lays out
new goals specific to protecting the food supply and responding to
incidents in a rapid and coordinated manner.
A. Food Protection Plan 2007
In May 2007, the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the
Commissioner of Food and Drugs charged FDA with developing a
comprehensive and integrated Food Protection Plan to keep the nation's
food supply safe from both unintentional and deliberate contamination.
Driven by science and modern information technology, the Food
Protection Plan aims to identify potential hazards and counter them
before they can do harm. A cornerstone of this forward-thinking effort
is an increased focus on prevention.
B. Project Emphasis
FDA's integrated approach within the Food Protection Plan
encompasses three core elements: Prevention, intervention and response.
Core Element 1: Prevention
The prevention element involves promoting increased corporate
responsibility so that food problems do not occur in the first place.
By comprehensively reviewing food supply vulnerabilities and developing
and implementing risk reduction measures
[[Page 42815]]
with industry and other stakeholders, we can best address critical
weaknesses.
Core Element 2: Intervention
The intervention element focuses on risk-based inspections,
sampling, and surveillance at high-risk points in the food supply
chain. These interventions must verify that the preventive measures are
being implemented and implemented correctly.
Core Element 3: Response
The response element bolsters FDA's emergency response efforts by
allowing for increased speed and efficiency. This element also includes
the idea of better communication with other Federal, State, and local
government agencies and industry during and after emergencies. Whether
contamination is unintentional or deliberate, there is a need to
respond quickly and to communicate clearly with consumers and other
stakeholders. The communication should emphasize identifying products
of concern as well as informing the public of what is safe to consume.
C. Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007
Under the Food and Drug Administration Amendment Act of 2007
(FDAAA), FDA is required to work with the states to improve food
safety. Section 1004 of the FDAAA states:
``(a) IN GENERAL--The Secretary shall work with the States in
undertaking activities and programs that assist in improving the safety
of food, including fresh and processed produce, so that State food
safety programs and activities conducted by the Secretary function in a
coordinated and cost-effective manner. With the assistance provided
under subsection (b), the Secretary shall encourage States to--
(1) establish, continue, or strengthen State food safety programs,
especially with respect to the regulation of retail commercial food
establishments; and
(2) establish procedures and requirements for ensuring that
processed produce under the jurisdiction of State food safety programs
is not unsafe for human consumption.''
D. Import Safety Action Plan
The Import Safety Action Plan (ISAP) acknowledges the value of
mutual leveraging of State and Federal resources and recommends
consideration of cooperative agreements to increase information
sharing. Specifically, the ISAP provides the following recommendations:
Federal-State Rapid Response
Recommendation 12--Maximize Federal-State Collaboration
The roles of and the resources used by the Federal Government and
the States in import safety are complementary. States possess
legislative authority and resources to respond to unsafe imported
products within their jurisdiction. The Federal Government can take
steps to interdict unsafe imported goods at ports of entry. Should an
unsafe product enter domestic commerce, federal departments and
agencies often work with State authorities to track it down, seize it,
notify the public if it has already been purchased by consumers, and
impose appropriate penalties on domestic entities who violate U.S. law.
Also, both the Federal Government and States may have access to
information relevant to protecting consumers that the other does not
possess. For example, Federal departments and agencies may have
relevant information about the foreign source of the imported product
and about the importer. This information can help State officials track
down an unsafe imported product within their jurisdiction. On the other
hand, State officials may identify an unsafe imported product during
transport or at the point of sale, if the product does get into the
country, and can tip off Federal officials to prevent future shipments
from entering domestic commerce.
Several Federal departments and agencies already collaborate
closely with State authorities to protect consumers. For example, FDA
has contracts and cooperative agreements with State Governments to
share information, conduct joint inspections, and collaborate on
laboratory analyses. Greater mutual leveraging of State and Federal
resources can further enhance consumer protection.
Recommendation 12.1 states: ``Consider cooperative agreements
between the federal inspection agencies and their state counterparts
for greater information-sharing.'' Such cooperative agreements would
not infringe on the statutory authorities of Federal or State
regulators and would encourage a coordinated effort that would result
in a more rapid and effective response. Establishing clear procedures
and points of contact for information sharing and joint enforcement
efforts can further enhance the effectiveness of Federal-State actions
to limit exposure and potential harm to consumers if an unsafe imported
product enters domestic commerce.
II. Award Information
Mechanism of Support
Support will be in the form of a Sole Source cooperative agreement
U18 Mechanism. Substantive involvement by the awarding agency is
inherent in the cooperative agreement award. Accordingly, FDA will have
substantial involvement in the program activities of the project funded
by the cooperative agreement.
III. Eligibility Information
A. Eligible Applicants
ORA is offering this sole source cooperative agreement to AFDO to
improve and update the Directory of State and Local Officials (current
version is from 2004) to provide information for Rapid Response and
information sharing. AFDO will also update the data in the AFDO State
Food Safety Resource Survey including recall and foodborne illness
investigation information to identify and to support Risk Management
and information sharing. Assistance will be provided only to the AFDO.
No other applications are solicited.
B. Applicability
AFDO is uniquely qualified for this cooperative agreement. AFDO
(https://www.afdo.org/) conducted a nationwide survey of State and local
food safety programs in 2000 and, with the National Center for Food
Protection and Defense, has been an active partner in the FoodSHIELD
project (https://www.afdo.org/afdo/upload/061025-
FoodSHIELD%20Brochure.pdf, https://www.foodshield.org/), during which
AFDO has collected contact information of State and local jurisdictions
comparable to the FDA Directory of State and Local Officials (https://
www.fda.gov/ora/fed_state/directorytable.htm). AFDO is the
organization qualified for conducting this work because:
AFDO is the only national organization that represents the
State and local food protection regulatory agencies. AFDO's principal
purpose is to act as a leader and a resource to State and local
regulatory agencies in developing strategies to resolve and promote
public health and consumer protection related to the regulation of
foods, drugs, medical devices, and consumer products. Regular members
are officials of State and local regulatory agencies that administer
these programs in conjunction and collaboration with FDA.
AFDO has always focused on the administration of the
nation's food
[[Page 42816]]
protection programs. Thus, unlike other organizations, AFDO has a
unique perspective on the infrastructure, capacity, strengths, and
needs of State and local food protection programs.
AFDO has successful experience in carrying out national
efforts that focus on the needs of State and local regulatory agencies.
FDA has used the data from the initial AFDO State Food Safety Resource
Survey, AFDO model codes, and training programs such as the Seafood
HACCP training program certified through AFDO. AFDO has also developed
the AFDO Recall Manual and many other training programs and initiatives
with the Centers for Disease Control, the U.S. Department of
Agriculture, and others in meat and poultry processing at retail. AFDO
also has industry associate members.
C. Award Amount
The total amount of funding available for fiscal years 2008 through
2010 is $250,000. This cooperative agreement will award up to $250,000
in total (direct plus indirect) costs for a 3-year cooperative
agreement.
D. Length of Support
The length of support for this project will be 3 years.
E. Cost Sharing or Matching
Cost sharing is not required.
IV. Application and Submission
A. Application Information
Applications must be prepared using the most current SF424
(Research and Related) (also referred to as the ``SF424 (R&R)'', which
is part of the Public Health Service, PHS 5161-1 form. Applications
must have a Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS)
number as the universal identifier when applying for Federal grants or
cooperative agreements. The DUNS number can be obtained by calling 866-
705-5711 or through the Web site at https://www.dnb.com/us/. (FDA has
verified the Web site addresses throughout this document, but we are
not responsible for any subsequent changes to the Web sites after this
document publishes in the Federal Register.)
Applications must be prepared using the forms found in the SF424
R&R instructions for preparing a nonmodular research grant application.
Submit a signed, typewritten original of the paper application,
including the checklist, three signed photocopies, and appendix
material in one package to: Marc Pitts (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT).
If you experience technical difficulties with your online
submission, you should contact either Marc Pitts (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT), or the Grants.gov Customer Support Center by e-
mail at support@grants.gov or by phone at 1-800-518-4726.
Information collection requirements requested on Form (SF-424) PHS
5161-1, expiration date of January 31, 2009, have been sent by the PHS
to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and have been approved and
assigned OMB control number OS-4040-0004.
B. Submission Dates and Times
The application receipt date is 30 days after the publication of
the funding opportunity in the Federal Register. Applications will be
accepted from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. e.s.t., Monday through Friday, until
the established receipt date. Applications submitted electronically
must be received by the close of business on the established receipt
date. No addendum material will be accepted after the established
receipt date.
C. Intergovernmental Review
The regulations issued under Executive Order 12372,
Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs (45 CFR part 100) apply.
Applicants (other than federally recognized tribal governments) should
contact the State's Single Point of Contact (SPOC) as early as possible
to alert the SPOC to the prospective application(s) and to receive any
necessary instructions on the State's review process. A current listing
of SPOCs is located at http//www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants/spoc.html.
The SPOC should send any State review process recommendations to the
FDA administrative contact (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). The
due date for the State process recommendations is no later than 60 days
after the application receipt date. FDA does not guarantee
accommodation or explanation of SPOC comments that are received after
the 60-day cutoff.
D. Funding Restrictions
This cooperative agreement is not to fund annual, regional, or
State meetings of AFDO, travel for other than project employees,
equipment other than consumables or as outlined in the application, or
any remodeling or capital improvement to office location or space.
E. Central Contractor Registration
Applicants must register with the Central Contractor Registration
(CCR) database. This database is a government-wide warehouse of
commercial and financial information for all organizations conducting
business with the Federal Government. Registration with CCR is a
mandatory requirement and is consistent with the government-wide
management reform to create a citizen-centered Web presence and to
build e-gov infrastructures in and across agencies to establish a
``single face to industry.'' The preferred method for completing a
registration is through the World Wide Web at https://www.ccr.gov. This
Web site provides a CCR handbook with detailed information on data you
will need prior to beginning the online preregistration, as well as
steps to walk you through the registration process. You must have a
DUNS number to begin your registration. The CCR registration process
can also be found under the ``Organization Registration'' page of
Grants.gov at https://www.grants.gov/applicants/organization_
registration.jsp.
F. Copyright Material
Applicant and applicants' subgrantees and subcontractors must
ensure that any projects developed in whole or in part with Federal
funds may be made available to other State, territorial, local, and
tribal regulatory agencies by FDA or its agents. Any copyrighted or
copyrightable works shall be subject to a royalty-free, nonexclusive,
and irrevocable license to the Federal Government to reproduce,
publish, or otherwise use them, and to authorize others to do so for
Federal Government purposes.
Dated: July 15, 2008.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.
[FR Doc. E8-16818 Filed 7-22-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S