Medicare Program; Evaluation Criteria and Standards for Quality Improvement Program Contracts (9th Scope of Work), 42352-42355 [E8-16757]
Download as PDF
42352
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 140 / Monday, July 21, 2008 / Notices
All Atomic Weapons Employer (AWE)
employees who worked at the Kellex/
Pierpont facility in Jersey City, New Jersey,
from January 1, 1943, through December 31,
1953, for a number of work days aggregating
at least 250 work days occurring either solely
under this employment or in combination
with work days within the parameters
established for one or more other classes of
employees in the Special Exposure Cohort.
This designation became effective on
June 29, 2008, as provided for under 42
U.S.C. 7384l(14)(C). Hence, beginning
on June 29, 2008, members of this class
of employees, defined as reported in
this notice, became members of the
Special Exposure Cohort.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Larry Elliott, Director, Office of
Compensation Analysis and Support,
National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health (NIOSH), 4676
Columbia Parkway, MS C–46,
Cincinnati, OH 45226, Telephone 1–
800–CDC-INFO (1–800–232–4636) or
directly at 1–513–533–6800 (this is not
a toll-free number). Information requests
can also be submitted by e-mail to
OCAS@CDC.GOV.
Dated: July 2, 2008.
John Howard,
Director, National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. E8–16607 Filed 7–18–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–19–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
[CMS–3189–NC]
RIN 0938–AP36
Medicare Program; Evaluation Criteria
and Standards for Quality
Improvement Program Contracts (9th
Scope of Work)
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Notice with comment period.
PWALKER on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice with comment
period describes the general criteria we
intend to use to evaluate the efficiency
and effectiveness of the Quality
Improvement Organizations (QIOs) who
will enter into contract with CMS under
the 9th SOW on August 1, 2008. The
evaluation of the QIOs’ performance
related to their Statement of Work
(SOW) will be based on evaluation
criteria specified within the themes,
tasks, and subtasks set forth in the QIO’s
9th SOW.
DATES: Comment Date: To be assured
consideration, comments must be
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:22 Jul 18, 2008
Jkt 214001
received at one of the addresses
provided below, no later than 5 p.m. on
August 20, 2008.
ADDRESSES: In commenting, please refer
to file code CMS–3189–NC. Because of
staff and resource limitations, we cannot
accept comments by facsimile (FAX)
transmission.
You may submit comments in one of
four ways (please choose only one of the
ways listed):
1. Electronically. You may submit
electronic comments on specific issues
in this regulation to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for ‘‘Comment or
Submission’’ and enter the filecode to
find the document accepting comments.
2. By regular mail. You may mail
written comments (one original and two
copies) to the following address ONLY:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, Attention: CMS–3189–
NC, P.O. Box 8016, Baltimore, MD
21244–1850.
Please allow sufficient time for mailed
comments to be received before the
close of the comment period.
3. By express or overnight mail. You
may send written comments (one
original and two copies) to the following
address ONLY: Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services, Department of
Health and Human Services, Attention:
CMS–3189–NC, Mail Stop C4–26–05,
7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD
21244–1850.
4. By hand or courier. If you prefer,
you may deliver (by hand or courier)
your written comments (one original
and two copies) before the close of the
comment period to either of the
following addresses.
a. Room 445–G, Hubert H. Humphrey
Building, 200 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20201. (Because
access to the interior of the HHH
Building is not readily available to
persons without Federal Government
identification, commenters are
encouraged to leave their comments in
the CMS drop slots located in the main
lobby of the building. A stamp-in clock
is available for persons wishing to retain
a proof of filing by stamping in and
retaining an extra copy of the comments
being filed.)
b. 7500 Security Boulevard,
Baltimore, MD 21244–1850. If you
intend to deliver your comments to the
Baltimore address, please call telephone
number (410) 786–9994 in advance to
schedule your arrival with one of our
staff members.
Comments mailed to the addresses
indicated as appropriate for hand or
courier delivery may be delayed and
received after the comment period.
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
For information on viewing public
comments, see the beginning of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cynthia Pamon (410) 786–9167.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Inspection of Public Comments: All
comments received before the close of
the comment period are available for
viewing by the public, including any
personally identifiable or confidential
business information that is included in
a comment. We post all comments
received before the close of the
comment period on the following Web
site as soon as possible after they have
been received: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the search
instructions on that Web site to view
public comments.
Comments received timely will also
be available for public inspection as
they are received, generally beginning
approximately 3 weeks after publication
of a document, at the headquarters of
the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, 7500 Security Boulevard,
Baltimore, Maryland 21244, Monday
through Friday of each week from 8:30
a.m. to 4 p.m. To schedule an
appointment to view public comments,
phone 1–800–743–3951.
I. Background
Section 1153(h)(2) of the Act requires
the Secretary to publish in the Federal
Register the general criteria and
standards that will be used to evaluate
the efficient and effective performance
of contract obligations by QIOs and to
provide the opportunity for public
comment with respect to such criteria
and standards. This notice describes the
general criteria that will be used to
evaluate QIO performance under the 9th
SOW contract beginning in August
2008.
II. Themes, Tasks, Subtasks Description
Under the 9th SOW, QIOs are
responsible for completing the
requirements for the following themes:
Beneficiary Protection, Patient Safety,
Prevention and Care Transitions.
(Detailed information for each theme
may be found in Sections C.6. and C.7.
Theme Requirements of the 9th SOW
posted at the www.fedbizopps.gov Web
site. On the home page of the Web site,
type ‘‘QIO’’ into ‘‘Quick Search’’ and
click on ‘‘GO’’ to view the RFP under
solicitation numbers
‘‘9thSOWInStateQIOs–NAHC’’ and
‘‘CMS–2007–QIO9thSOW–NAHC’’).
Beneficiary Protection (See Section
C.6.1. of the 9th Statement of Work)
Beneficiary Protection activities will
emphasize statutory and regulatory
E:\FR\FM\21JYN1.SGM
21JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 140 / Monday, July 21, 2008 / Notices
mandated review activity and quality
improvement. Primary case review
categories include utilization review,
quality of care review, review of
beneficiary appeals of certain provider
notices, and reviews of potential antidumping cases. Quality of care review
includes the review of beneficiary
complaints. In conducting reviews of
beneficiary complaints, the QIO shall
utilize a number of tools intended to
address the beneficiary’s concerns,
including implementation of quality
improvement activities (QIAs),
surveying of beneficiary satisfaction
with the complaint process, and, if
appropriate, alternative dispute
resolution mechanisms. The Tasks
under this theme will focus on
conducting activities to meet, in an
efficient and effective manner,
regulatory and statutory requirements,
to enhance QIO collaboration with the
Beneficiary Complaint Survey
Contractor, Fiscal Intermediaries (FIs),
Carriers, Medicare Administrative
Contractors (MACs), State Survey
Agencies (SSAs), the Office of Inspector
General (OIG), and the Medicare Office
of Hearings and Appeals and to clearly
establish the link between case review
and quality improvement through data
analysis and improvement assistance.
Patient Safety (See Section C.6.2. of the
9th Statement of Work)
QIO activities under the Patient Safety
Theme will focus on six components:
Improving inpatient surgical safety and
heart failure (SCIP/HF), reducing rates
of pressure ulcers (PrU-Nursing Homes
and Hospitals), reducing rates of and
use of physical restraints (PR),
improving drug safety, reducing rates of
healthcare associated Methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
infections and activities aimed at
nursing homes in need (NHIN). The
requirements of the Patient Safety
Theme are designed to address areas of
patient harm for which there is evidence
of how to improve safety by improving
health care processes and systems.
PWALKER on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Prevention (See Section C.6.3. of the 9th
Statement of Work)
The Prevention Theme contains two
cancer screening tasks (breast cancer
and colorectal cancer (CRC)), two
immunization tasks (influenza and
pneumococcal) and Tasks on disparities
related to diabetes self-management and
chronic kidney disease (CKD)
prevention.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:22 Jul 18, 2008
Jkt 214001
Sub-National Theme Requirements
Prevention: Disparities (Directed SubNational Task, See Section C.7.1. of the
9th Statement of Work)
Under this Theme, the QIO will work
with practice sites and other
organizations in its state/jurisdiction to
improve diabetes measures within
underserved populations. QIO
Disparities work includes tasks related
to Diabetes Self-Management Education.
Diabetes Self-Management Education
(DSME) is an approach that has been
demonstrated to be effective in
improving diabetes clinical outcomes
and other related health dimensions.
DSME is an intervention in itself for
diabetes behavior and outcomes
improvement. The QIO will facilitate
training of appropriate personnel at
organizational sites using evidencebased CMS-approved DSME programs
within the underserved population of
the qualified physician practices. The
QIO will establish a partnership with
the primary care physician, certified
diabetes educators and community
health workers to facilitate the
accessibility of DSME services to
patients. This task is directed and will
be limited to a sub-set of States with
sufficient underserved Medicare
diabetes populations, as determined by
CMS. See section C.7.1 of the 9th SOW
for the list of the 33 states eligible for
this task.
Care Transitions (Optional SubNational Theme, See Section C.7.2. of
the 9th Statement of Work)
The QIO work under the Care
Transitions Theme aims to measurably
improve the quality of care for Medicare
beneficiaries who transition among care
settings through a comprehensive
community effort. These efforts aim to
reduce readmissions following
hospitalizations and to yield sustainable
and replicable strategies to achieve
high-value health care for sick and
disabled Medicare beneficiaries.
Prevention: Chronic Kidney Disease
(Optional Sub-National Task, See
Section C.7.3 of the 9th Statement of
Work)
The goal of this Task is to detect the
incidence and decrease the progression
of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and
improve care among Medicare
beneficiaries through provider adoption
of timely and effective quality of care
interventions; participation in quality
incentive initiatives; beneficiary
education; and key linkages and
collaborations for system change at the
state and local level.
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
42353
In addition to improving the quality
of care for the elderly and frail-elderly,
this Task aims to reduce the rate of
Medicare entitlement by disability
through the delay and prevention of
ESRD.
The focus areas for quality
improvement in CKD include: Timely
testing to detect the rate of kidney
failure due to diabetes; slowing the
progression of disease in individuals
with diabetes through the use of ACE
(angiotensin converting enzyme)
inhibitors and/or an angiotensin
receptor blocking (ARB) agent; and
arteriovenous fistula (AV fistula)
placement and maturation (as a first
choice for arteriovenous access where
medically appropriate) for individuals
who elect, as a part of timely renal
replacement therapy counseling,
hemodialysis as their treatment option
for kidney failure.
III. Measuring QIO Performance
Overall Contract Evaluation (See
Section C.5 of the 9th SOW posted at
www.fedbizops.gov for more detailed
overall contract evaluation criteria. On
the www.fedbizopps.gov home page,
type ‘‘QIO’’ into ‘‘Quick Search’’ and
click on ‘‘GO’’ to view the RFP under
solicitation numbers
‘‘9thSOWInStateQIOs–NAHC’’ and
‘‘CMS–2007–QIO9thSOW–NAHC’’).
Under the 9th SOW, the QIO’s
performance in undertaking activities to
carry out the requirements of each of the
Themes (Beneficiary Protection, Care
Transitions, Patient Safety and
Prevention) and components within
those Themes will be used to determine
the QIO’s success or failure in meeting
the overall evaluation criteria as
specified below. The QIO shall be
evaluated on the Themes and
components under the Themes required
under the contract. If a QIO is not tasked
to work on a Theme or a specific
component under the Theme, the QIO
will not be evaluated under that
particular Theme or component. Any
Special Project (SP) that the QIO may
carry out will be evaluated separately
and will not be considered in the overall
evaluation criteria.
There will be two periods of
evaluation under the 9th SOW. The first
evaluation will focus on the QIO’s work
in three Theme areas (Care Transitions,
Patient Safety, and Prevention) and will
occur at the end of 18 months using the
most recent data available to CMS. The
second evaluation will examine the
QIO’s performance on Tasks within all
Theme areas (Beneficiary Protection,
Care Transitions, Patient Safety, and
Prevention). The second evaluation will
take place at the end of the 28th month
E:\FR\FM\21JYN1.SGM
21JYN1
42354
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 140 / Monday, July 21, 2008 / Notices
of the contract term and will be based
on the most recent data available to
CMS. The performance results of the
evaluation at both time periods (that is,
at 18 months and at 28 months) will be
used to determine the performance on
the overall contract.
The first contract evaluation will
determine if the QIO has met the
performance criteria in the Theme areas
of Care Transitions, Patient Safety, and
Prevention and in the components
within those Themes. The Themes or
components within the Theme as
appropriate will be evaluated on an
individual basis with the determination
relative to only that area.
The second contract evaluation will
determine if the QIO has met the
performance criteria in all Theme areas
of Beneficiary Protection, Care
Transitions, Patient Safety and
Prevention, and in the components
within those Themes. The performance
on the Beneficiary Protection Theme
will cover the 28-month contract period.
The results of the first and second
evaluations at the end of the 18 and 28
month periods will be used to
determine how the contractor performed
on the overall contract in total.
18-Month Evaluation Criteria (by Theme
or component of the Theme excluding
Beneficiary Protection)
• Pass = Criteria met and CMS may
elect the option to continue the work
(and funding) of the Theme or
component of the Theme where
appropriate.
• Fail = Criteria not met and we may,
among other remedies, elect NOT to
continue the work (or funding) for the
Theme or component of the Theme
where appropriate for the contract
duration.
28-Month Evaluation Criteria (by Theme
or component of the Theme including
Beneficiary Protection for the 28-month
contract period)
• Pass = Criteria met for Theme or
component of the Theme where
appropriate.
• Fail = Criteria not met for Theme or
component of the Theme where
appropriate.
QIO’s rights under the then current
statute.
The specific evaluation criteria are
described below for each Theme or
component within a Theme as
appropriate. In general, for areas of work
that have been performed under the 8th
SOW or other recent QIO SOW where
historical data is available for analysis,
the acceptable performance expectation
is a specific target or tighter target range
than for areas of work that have not
been in previous SOWs and where the
experience under a previous SOW
demonstrated that there was a range for
acceptable performance. For the
purpose of determining scores for all
Themes, components within a Theme,
or measures within a Theme, all
percentages will be rounded to two
places (with the value at or above five
in the thousands position (for example,
.005, .015, etc. rounded up).
Beneficiary Protection
• Pass = 90% of Target
• Fail = <90%
Patient Safety: Surgical Care
Improvement Project/Heart Failure
(SCIP/HF), Pressure Ulcers and Physical
Restraints
• Pass = 70–100% of Target
• Fail = <70%
Patient Safety: Methicillin Resistant
Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA)
• Pass = 70–100% of Target
• Fail = <70%
Patient Safety: Drug Safety, Nursing
Homes In Need (NHIN)
• Pass = 70–100% of Target
• Fail = <70%
Prevention: Cancer Screening,
Mammograms, and Immunizations
• Pass = 100% of Target
• Fail = <100%
Prevention: Disparities
• Pass = 80% of Target
• Fail = <80%
Care Transitions
• Pass = 100%–80% of Target
• Fail = <80%
PWALKER on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Overall Contract Performance
Prevention: Chronic Kidney Disease
(CKD)
• Pass = Pass on all Themes and
components within the Theme at both
evaluation periods.
• Fail = Fail any Theme or
component within the Theme in either
evaluation period.
If CMS chooses, we may notify the
QIO of the intention not to renew the
QIO contract, and inform the QIO of the
• Pass = 100%–80% of Target
• Fail = <80%
The list of measures and performance
criteria for each QIO will be recorded on
the CMS Dashboard, which will be
available on QIOnet (https://
qionet.sdps.org), the standard
information system that supports the
QIO Program. We will also post these
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:22 Jul 18, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
measures on our publicly accessible
Web site (https://www.cms.gov).
We will monitor the QIO’s
performance on Themes, components
within the Themes and measures within
Themes against established criteria on a
quarterly basis, and may take
appropriate contract action (for
example, providing warning for the
need for adjustment, instituting a formal
correction plan, terminating an activity,
or recommending early termination of a
contract because of failure to meet
contract timelines).
CMS reserves the right at any point
prior to the notification of our intention
not to continue the option for a Theme
and/or to renew the contract to adjust
the expected minimum thresholds for
satisfactory performance or remove
criteria from a Theme or Theme
component evaluation protocol for any
reason, including, but not limited to,
data gathered based on experience with
the amount of improvement achieved
during the contract cycle or in pilot
projects currently in progress,
information gathered through evaluation
of the QIO Program overall, or any
unforeseen circumstances. Further, in
accordance with standard contract
procedures, we reserve the right at any
time to discontinue a Theme or a
component of a Theme regardless of
QIO performance on the Theme or
component of the Theme.
IV. Standards for Minimum Contract
Performance Within a Theme
Beneficiary Protection Contract
Evaluation (See Sections C.5 and C.6.1.
of the 9th SOW)
CMS will evaluate, on a quarterly
basis, achievement of minimum
performance thresholds on timeliness of
review activities, beneficiary
satisfaction with the complaint process,
beneficiary satisfaction generally and
quality improvement activities.
Additionally, CMS will evaluate systemwide change improvement activities and
PPS inpatient hospital data reporting.
Patient Safety (See Sections C.5 and
C.6.2. of the 9th SOW)
CMS will evaluate achievement of
minimum performance thresholds on
specific clinical measures at the 18th
and 28th month evaluation periods.
CMS will evaluate improvements in the
SCIP (surgical care improvement
program) measures, MRSA (methicillin
Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus)
hospital measures, PrU (pressure ulcers)
in hospitals and nursing homes and PR
(physical restraints) in nursing homes,
and prescription drug safety measures.
E:\FR\FM\21JYN1.SGM
21JYN1
42355
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 140 / Monday, July 21, 2008 / Notices
CMS will also evaluate work and
improvement with a small number of
poorly performing nursing homes. CMS
will evaluate the nursing homes’
perception of the effectiveness of QIO
technical assistance and on
improvement in the quality measures.
Prevention (See Sections C.5 and C.6.3.
of the 9th SOW)
CMS will evaluate achievement of
minimum performance thresholds on
specific clinical measures at the 18th
and 28th month evaluation periods.
CMS will evaluate the work with a
selected group of participating practices
(PPs) in its state/jurisdiction with
already implemented electronic health
records (EHRs) to assess improvements
in breast cancer and CRC screening rates
and to improvements in immunization
rates for influenza and pneumococcal
pneumonia among Medicare
beneficiaries.
Sub-National Theme Requirements
Prevention: Disparities (Directed SubNational Task, See Sections C.5 and
C.7.1. of the 9th SOW
CMS will evaluate achievement of
minimum performance thresholds on
specific measures on a quarterly basis
and at the 18th and 28th month
evaluation periods. CMS will evaluate
recruitment of targeted providers and
enrollment of targeted patients. CMS
will also evaluate improvements in the
rates for hemoglobin A1c testing, eye
exams, lipid testing and blood pressure
control for diabetic patients.
Care Transitions, (Optional SubNational Theme, See Sections C.5 and
C.7.2. of the 9th SOW)
CMS will evaluate achievement of
minimum performance thresholds on
specific clinical measures at the 18th
and 28th month evaluation periods.
CMS will evaluate patient care
transitions that are: attributable to
participating providers; related to
implementation of interventions that
address hospital/community system-
wide processes; the potential subject of
an implemented intervention that
addresses acute myocardial infarction,
congestive heart failure, and
pneumonia; the potential subject of an
implemented intervention that
addresses specific reasons for
readmission. CMS will also evaluate the
percentage of implemented
interventions that are measured and the
percentage of patient care transitions to
which implemented and measured
interventions apply and show
improvement. CMS will also evaluate
patient satisfaction and patient
readmission rates.
Prevention: Chronic Kidney Disease
(Optional Sub-National Task, See
Sections C.5 and C.7.3 of the 9th SOW)
CMS will evaluate achievement of
minimum performance thresholds on all
clinical outcome measures at the 18th
and 28th month evaluation periods.
CMS will evaluate timely testing to
reduce the rate of kidney failure due to
diabetes, improvement in the use of
ACE inhibitor and/or ARB agent, and
improvement in the rate of AV fistula
placement.
V. Response to Comments
Because of the large number of public
comments we normally receive on
Federal Register documents, we are not
able to acknowledge or respond to them
individually. We will consider all
comments we receive by the date and
time specified in the DATES section of
this preamble, and, when we proceed
with a subsequent document, we will
respond to the comments in the
preamble to that document.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program No. 93.774, Medicare—
Supplementary Medical Insurance Program.
Dated: April 25, 2008.
Kerry Weems,
Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare
& Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. E8–16757 Filed 7–18–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and
Families
Proposed Information Collection
Activity; Comment Request
Proposed Projects
Title: Child Care Quarterly Case
Record Report—ACF–801.
OMB No.: 0970–0167.
Description: Section 658K of the Child
Care and Development Block Grant Act
of 1990 (Pub. L. 101–508, 42 U.S.C.
9858) requires that States and
Territories submit monthly case-level
data on the children and families
receiving direct services under the Child
Care and Development Fund. The
implementing regulations for the
statutorily required reporting are at 45
CFR 98.70. Case-level reports, submitted
quarterly or monthly (at grantee option),
include monthly sample or full
population case-level data. The data
elements to be included in these reports
are represented in the ACF–801. ACF
uses disaggregate data to determine
program and participant characteristics
as well as costs and levels of child care
services provided. This provides ACF
with the information necessary to make
reports to Congress, address national
child care needs, offer technical
assistance to grantees, meet performance
measures, and conduct research.
Consistent with the statute and
regulations, ACF requests extension of
the ACF–801. With this extension, ACF
is proposing several changes and
clarifications to the reporting
requirements and instructions.
Respondents: States, the District of
Columbia, and Territories including
Puerto Rico, Guam, the Virgin Islands,
American Samoa, and the Northern
Marianna Islands.
ANNUAL BURDEN ESTIMATES
Instrument
PWALKER on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
ACF–801 ..........................................................................................
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 4,480.
In compliance with the requirements
of Section 506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:22 Jul 18, 2008
Jkt 214001
56
Administration for Children and
Families is soliciting public comment
on the specific aspects of the
information collection described above.
Copies of the proposed collection of
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Average
burden
hours
per
response
No. of
responses
per
respondent
No. of
respondents
4
Total
burden
hours
20
4,480
information can be obtained and
comments may be forwarded by writing
to the Administration for Children and
Families, Office of Administration,
Office of Information Services, 370
E:\FR\FM\21JYN1.SGM
21JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 140 (Monday, July 21, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42352-42355]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-16757]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
[CMS-3189-NC]
RIN 0938-AP36
Medicare Program; Evaluation Criteria and Standards for Quality
Improvement Program Contracts (9th Scope of Work)
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Notice with comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice with comment period describes the general criteria
we intend to use to evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of the
Quality Improvement Organizations (QIOs) who will enter into contract
with CMS under the 9th SOW on August 1, 2008. The evaluation of the
QIOs' performance related to their Statement of Work (SOW) will be
based on evaluation criteria specified within the themes, tasks, and
subtasks set forth in the QIO's 9th SOW.
DATES: Comment Date: To be assured consideration, comments must be
received at one of the addresses provided below, no later than 5 p.m.
on August 20, 2008.
ADDRESSES: In commenting, please refer to file code CMS-3189-NC.
Because of staff and resource limitations, we cannot accept comments by
facsimile (FAX) transmission.
You may submit comments in one of four ways (please choose only one
of the ways listed):
1. Electronically. You may submit electronic comments on specific
issues in this regulation to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for ``Comment or Submission'' and enter the filecode to
find the document accepting comments.
2. By regular mail. You may mail written comments (one original and
two copies) to the following address ONLY: Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services, Department of Health and Human Services, Attention:
CMS-3189-NC, P.O. Box 8016, Baltimore, MD 21244-1850.
Please allow sufficient time for mailed comments to be received
before the close of the comment period.
3. By express or overnight mail. You may send written comments (one
original and two copies) to the following address ONLY: Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of Health and Human Services,
Attention: CMS-3189-NC, Mail Stop C4-26-05, 7500 Security Boulevard,
Baltimore, MD 21244-1850.
4. By hand or courier. If you prefer, you may deliver (by hand or
courier) your written comments (one original and two copies) before the
close of the comment period to either of the following addresses.
a. Room 445-G, Hubert H. Humphrey Building, 200 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20201. (Because access to the interior of
the HHH Building is not readily available to persons without Federal
Government identification, commenters are encouraged to leave their
comments in the CMS drop slots located in the main lobby of the
building. A stamp-in clock is available for persons wishing to retain a
proof of filing by stamping in and retaining an extra copy of the
comments being filed.)
b. 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244-1850. If you intend
to deliver your comments to the Baltimore address, please call
telephone number (410) 786-9994 in advance to schedule your arrival
with one of our staff members.
Comments mailed to the addresses indicated as appropriate for hand
or courier delivery may be delayed and received after the comment
period.
For information on viewing public comments, see the beginning of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cynthia Pamon (410) 786-9167.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Inspection of Public Comments: All comments received before the
close of the comment period are available for viewing by the public,
including any personally identifiable or confidential business
information that is included in a comment. We post all comments
received before the close of the comment period on the following Web
site as soon as possible after they have been received: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the search instructions on that Web site to
view public comments.
Comments received timely will also be available for public
inspection as they are received, generally beginning approximately 3
weeks after publication of a document, at the headquarters of the
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 7500 Security Boulevard,
Baltimore, Maryland 21244, Monday through Friday of each week from 8:30
a.m. to 4 p.m. To schedule an appointment to view public comments,
phone 1-800-743-3951.
I. Background
Section 1153(h)(2) of the Act requires the Secretary to publish in
the Federal Register the general criteria and standards that will be
used to evaluate the efficient and effective performance of contract
obligations by QIOs and to provide the opportunity for public comment
with respect to such criteria and standards. This notice describes the
general criteria that will be used to evaluate QIO performance under
the 9th SOW contract beginning in August 2008.
II. Themes, Tasks, Subtasks Description
Under the 9th SOW, QIOs are responsible for completing the
requirements for the following themes: Beneficiary Protection, Patient
Safety, Prevention and Care Transitions. (Detailed information for each
theme may be found in Sections C.6. and C.7. Theme Requirements of the
9th SOW posted at the www.fedbizopps.gov Web site. On the home page of
the Web site, type ``QIO'' into ``Quick Search'' and click on ``GO'' to
view the RFP under solicitation numbers ``9thSOWInStateQIOs-NAHC'' and
``CMS-2007-QIO9thSOW-NAHC'').
Beneficiary Protection (See Section C.6.1. of the 9th Statement of
Work)
Beneficiary Protection activities will emphasize statutory and
regulatory
[[Page 42353]]
mandated review activity and quality improvement. Primary case review
categories include utilization review, quality of care review, review
of beneficiary appeals of certain provider notices, and reviews of
potential anti-dumping cases. Quality of care review includes the
review of beneficiary complaints. In conducting reviews of beneficiary
complaints, the QIO shall utilize a number of tools intended to address
the beneficiary's concerns, including implementation of quality
improvement activities (QIAs), surveying of beneficiary satisfaction
with the complaint process, and, if appropriate, alternative dispute
resolution mechanisms. The Tasks under this theme will focus on
conducting activities to meet, in an efficient and effective manner,
regulatory and statutory requirements, to enhance QIO collaboration
with the Beneficiary Complaint Survey Contractor, Fiscal Intermediaries
(FIs), Carriers, Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs), State
Survey Agencies (SSAs), the Office of Inspector General (OIG), and the
Medicare Office of Hearings and Appeals and to clearly establish the
link between case review and quality improvement through data analysis
and improvement assistance.
Patient Safety (See Section C.6.2. of the 9th Statement of Work)
QIO activities under the Patient Safety Theme will focus on six
components: Improving inpatient surgical safety and heart failure
(SCIP/HF), reducing rates of pressure ulcers (PrU-Nursing Homes and
Hospitals), reducing rates of and use of physical restraints (PR),
improving drug safety, reducing rates of healthcare associated
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections and
activities aimed at nursing homes in need (NHIN). The requirements of
the Patient Safety Theme are designed to address areas of patient harm
for which there is evidence of how to improve safety by improving
health care processes and systems.
Prevention (See Section C.6.3. of the 9th Statement of Work)
The Prevention Theme contains two cancer screening tasks (breast
cancer and colorectal cancer (CRC)), two immunization tasks (influenza
and pneumococcal) and Tasks on disparities related to diabetes self-
management and chronic kidney disease (CKD) prevention.
Sub-National Theme Requirements
Prevention: Disparities (Directed Sub-National Task, See Section C.7.1.
of the 9th Statement of Work)
Under this Theme, the QIO will work with practice sites and other
organizations in its state/jurisdiction to improve diabetes measures
within underserved populations. QIO Disparities work includes tasks
related to Diabetes Self-Management Education. Diabetes Self-Management
Education (DSME) is an approach that has been demonstrated to be
effective in improving diabetes clinical outcomes and other related
health dimensions. DSME is an intervention in itself for diabetes
behavior and outcomes improvement. The QIO will facilitate training of
appropriate personnel at organizational sites using evidence-based CMS-
approved DSME programs within the underserved population of the
qualified physician practices. The QIO will establish a partnership
with the primary care physician, certified diabetes educators and
community health workers to facilitate the accessibility of DSME
services to patients. This task is directed and will be limited to a
sub-set of States with sufficient underserved Medicare diabetes
populations, as determined by CMS. See section C.7.1 of the 9th SOW for
the list of the 33 states eligible for this task.
Care Transitions (Optional Sub-National Theme, See Section C.7.2. of
the 9th Statement of Work)
The QIO work under the Care Transitions Theme aims to measurably
improve the quality of care for Medicare beneficiaries who transition
among care settings through a comprehensive community effort. These
efforts aim to reduce readmissions following hospitalizations and to
yield sustainable and replicable strategies to achieve high-value
health care for sick and disabled Medicare beneficiaries.
Prevention: Chronic Kidney Disease (Optional Sub-National Task, See
Section C.7.3 of the 9th Statement of Work)
The goal of this Task is to detect the incidence and decrease the
progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and improve care among
Medicare beneficiaries through provider adoption of timely and
effective quality of care interventions; participation in quality
incentive initiatives; beneficiary education; and key linkages and
collaborations for system change at the state and local level.
In addition to improving the quality of care for the elderly and
frail-elderly, this Task aims to reduce the rate of Medicare
entitlement by disability through the delay and prevention of ESRD.
The focus areas for quality improvement in CKD include: Timely
testing to detect the rate of kidney failure due to diabetes; slowing
the progression of disease in individuals with diabetes through the use
of ACE (angiotensin converting enzyme) inhibitors and/or an angiotensin
receptor blocking (ARB) agent; and arteriovenous fistula (AV fistula)
placement and maturation (as a first choice for arteriovenous access
where medically appropriate) for individuals who elect, as a part of
timely renal replacement therapy counseling, hemodialysis as their
treatment option for kidney failure.
III. Measuring QIO Performance
Overall Contract Evaluation (See Section C.5 of the 9th SOW posted
at www.fedbizops.gov for more detailed overall contract evaluation
criteria. On the www.fedbizopps.gov home page, type ``QIO'' into
``Quick Search'' and click on ``GO'' to view the RFP under solicitation
numbers ``9thSOWInStateQIOs-NAHC'' and ``CMS-2007-QIO9thSOW-NAHC'').
Under the 9th SOW, the QIO's performance in undertaking activities
to carry out the requirements of each of the Themes (Beneficiary
Protection, Care Transitions, Patient Safety and Prevention) and
components within those Themes will be used to determine the QIO's
success or failure in meeting the overall evaluation criteria as
specified below. The QIO shall be evaluated on the Themes and
components under the Themes required under the contract. If a QIO is
not tasked to work on a Theme or a specific component under the Theme,
the QIO will not be evaluated under that particular Theme or component.
Any Special Project (SP) that the QIO may carry out will be evaluated
separately and will not be considered in the overall evaluation
criteria.
There will be two periods of evaluation under the 9th SOW. The
first evaluation will focus on the QIO's work in three Theme areas
(Care Transitions, Patient Safety, and Prevention) and will occur at
the end of 18 months using the most recent data available to CMS. The
second evaluation will examine the QIO's performance on Tasks within
all Theme areas (Beneficiary Protection, Care Transitions, Patient
Safety, and Prevention). The second evaluation will take place at the
end of the 28th month
[[Page 42354]]
of the contract term and will be based on the most recent data
available to CMS. The performance results of the evaluation at both
time periods (that is, at 18 months and at 28 months) will be used to
determine the performance on the overall contract.
The first contract evaluation will determine if the QIO has met the
performance criteria in the Theme areas of Care Transitions, Patient
Safety, and Prevention and in the components within those Themes. The
Themes or components within the Theme as appropriate will be evaluated
on an individual basis with the determination relative to only that
area.
The second contract evaluation will determine if the QIO has met
the performance criteria in all Theme areas of Beneficiary Protection,
Care Transitions, Patient Safety and Prevention, and in the components
within those Themes. The performance on the Beneficiary Protection
Theme will cover the 28-month contract period.
The results of the first and second evaluations at the end of the
18 and 28 month periods will be used to determine how the contractor
performed on the overall contract in total.
18-Month Evaluation Criteria (by Theme or component of the Theme
excluding Beneficiary Protection)
Pass = Criteria met and CMS may elect the option to
continue the work (and funding) of the Theme or component of the Theme
where appropriate.
Fail = Criteria not met and we may, among other remedies,
elect NOT to continue the work (or funding) for the Theme or component
of the Theme where appropriate for the contract duration.
28-Month Evaluation Criteria (by Theme or component of the Theme
including Beneficiary Protection for the 28-month contract period)
Pass = Criteria met for Theme or component of the Theme
where appropriate.
Fail = Criteria not met for Theme or component of the
Theme where appropriate.
Overall Contract Performance
Pass = Pass on all Themes and components within the Theme
at both evaluation periods.
Fail = Fail any Theme or component within the Theme in
either evaluation period.
If CMS chooses, we may notify the QIO of the intention not to renew
the QIO contract, and inform the QIO of the QIO's rights under the then
current statute.
The specific evaluation criteria are described below for each Theme
or component within a Theme as appropriate. In general, for areas of
work that have been performed under the 8th SOW or other recent QIO SOW
where historical data is available for analysis, the acceptable
performance expectation is a specific target or tighter target range
than for areas of work that have not been in previous SOWs and where
the experience under a previous SOW demonstrated that there was a range
for acceptable performance. For the purpose of determining scores for
all Themes, components within a Theme, or measures within a Theme, all
percentages will be rounded to two places (with the value at or above
five in the thousands position (for example, .005, .015, etc. rounded
up).
Beneficiary Protection
Pass = 90% of Target
Fail = <90%
Patient Safety: Surgical Care Improvement Project/Heart Failure (SCIP/
HF), Pressure Ulcers and Physical Restraints
Pass = 70-100% of Target
Fail = <70%
Patient Safety: Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA)
Pass = 70-100% of Target
Fail = <70%
Patient Safety: Drug Safety, Nursing Homes In Need (NHIN)
Pass = 70-100% of Target
Fail = <70%
Prevention: Cancer Screening, Mammograms, and Immunizations
Pass = 100% of Target
Fail = <100%
Prevention: Disparities
Pass = 80% of Target
Fail = <80%
Care Transitions
Pass = 100%-80% of Target
Fail = <80%
Prevention: Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)
Pass = 100%-80% of Target
Fail = <80%
The list of measures and performance criteria for each QIO will be
recorded on the CMS Dashboard, which will be available on QIOnet
(https://qionet.sdps.org), the standard information system that supports
the QIO Program. We will also post these measures on our publicly
accessible Web site (https://www.cms.gov).
We will monitor the QIO's performance on Themes, components within
the Themes and measures within Themes against established criteria on a
quarterly basis, and may take appropriate contract action (for example,
providing warning for the need for adjustment, instituting a formal
correction plan, terminating an activity, or recommending early
termination of a contract because of failure to meet contract
timelines).
CMS reserves the right at any point prior to the notification of
our intention not to continue the option for a Theme and/or to renew
the contract to adjust the expected minimum thresholds for satisfactory
performance or remove criteria from a Theme or Theme component
evaluation protocol for any reason, including, but not limited to, data
gathered based on experience with the amount of improvement achieved
during the contract cycle or in pilot projects currently in progress,
information gathered through evaluation of the QIO Program overall, or
any unforeseen circumstances. Further, in accordance with standard
contract procedures, we reserve the right at any time to discontinue a
Theme or a component of a Theme regardless of QIO performance on the
Theme or component of the Theme.
IV. Standards for Minimum Contract Performance Within a Theme
Beneficiary Protection Contract Evaluation (See Sections C.5 and C.6.1.
of the 9th SOW)
CMS will evaluate, on a quarterly basis, achievement of minimum
performance thresholds on timeliness of review activities, beneficiary
satisfaction with the complaint process, beneficiary satisfaction
generally and quality improvement activities. Additionally, CMS will
evaluate system-wide change improvement activities and PPS inpatient
hospital data reporting.
Patient Safety (See Sections C.5 and C.6.2. of the 9th SOW)
CMS will evaluate achievement of minimum performance thresholds on
specific clinical measures at the 18th and 28th month evaluation
periods. CMS will evaluate improvements in the SCIP (surgical care
improvement program) measures, MRSA (methicillin Resistant
Staphylococcus Aureus) hospital measures, PrU (pressure ulcers) in
hospitals and nursing homes and PR (physical restraints) in nursing
homes, and prescription drug safety measures.
[[Page 42355]]
CMS will also evaluate work and improvement with a small number of
poorly performing nursing homes. CMS will evaluate the nursing homes'
perception of the effectiveness of QIO technical assistance and on
improvement in the quality measures.
Prevention (See Sections C.5 and C.6.3. of the 9th SOW)
CMS will evaluate achievement of minimum performance thresholds on
specific clinical measures at the 18th and 28th month evaluation
periods. CMS will evaluate the work with a selected group of
participating practices (PPs) in its state/jurisdiction with already
implemented electronic health records (EHRs) to assess improvements in
breast cancer and CRC screening rates and to improvements in
immunization rates for influenza and pneumococcal pneumonia among
Medicare beneficiaries.
Sub-National Theme Requirements Prevention: Disparities (Directed Sub-
National Task, See Sections C.5 and C.7.1. of the 9th SOW
CMS will evaluate achievement of minimum performance thresholds on
specific measures on a quarterly basis and at the 18th and 28th month
evaluation periods. CMS will evaluate recruitment of targeted providers
and enrollment of targeted patients. CMS will also evaluate
improvements in the rates for hemoglobin A1c testing, eye exams, lipid
testing and blood pressure control for diabetic patients.
Care Transitions, (Optional Sub-National Theme, See Sections C.5 and
C.7.2. of the 9th SOW)
CMS will evaluate achievement of minimum performance thresholds on
specific clinical measures at the 18th and 28th month evaluation
periods. CMS will evaluate patient care transitions that are:
attributable to participating providers; related to implementation of
interventions that address hospital/community system-wide processes;
the potential subject of an implemented intervention that addresses
acute myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, and pneumonia;
the potential subject of an implemented intervention that addresses
specific reasons for readmission. CMS will also evaluate the percentage
of implemented interventions that are measured and the percentage of
patient care transitions to which implemented and measured
interventions apply and show improvement. CMS will also evaluate
patient satisfaction and patient readmission rates.
Prevention: Chronic Kidney Disease (Optional Sub-National Task, See
Sections C.5 and C.7.3 of the 9th SOW)
CMS will evaluate achievement of minimum performance thresholds on
all clinical outcome measures at the 18th and 28th month evaluation
periods. CMS will evaluate timely testing to reduce the rate of kidney
failure due to diabetes, improvement in the use of ACE inhibitor and/or
ARB agent, and improvement in the rate of AV fistula placement.
V. Response to Comments
Because of the large number of public comments we normally receive
on Federal Register documents, we are not able to acknowledge or
respond to them individually. We will consider all comments we receive
by the date and time specified in the DATES section of this preamble,
and, when we proceed with a subsequent document, we will respond to the
comments in the preamble to that document.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.774,
Medicare--Supplementary Medical Insurance Program.
Dated: April 25, 2008.
Kerry Weems,
Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. E8-16757 Filed 7-18-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P