Raisins Produced From Grapes Grown In California; Revisions to Requirements Regarding Off-Grade Raisins, 42257-42259 [E8-16605]
Download as PDF
42257
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 73, No. 140
Monday, July 21, 2008
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final
rule is issued under Marketing
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agreement and Order No. 989 (7 CFR
part 989), both as amended, regulating
Agricultural Marketing Service
the handling of raisins produced from
grapes grown in California, hereinafter
7 CFR Part 989
referred to as the ‘‘order.’’ The order is
effective under the Agricultural
[Docket No. AMS–FV–07–0117; FV07–989–
4 FR]
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as
amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter
Raisins Produced From Grapes Grown referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
In California; Revisions to
The Department of Agriculture
Requirements Regarding Off-Grade
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
Raisins
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service,
This final rule has been reviewed
USDA.
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
ACTION: Final rule.
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended
to have retroactive effect. This final rule
SUMMARY: This rule revises requirements
will not preempt any State or local laws,
regarding off-grade raisins under the
regulations, or policies, unless they
Federal marketing order for California
present an irreconcilable conflict with
raisins (order). The order regulates the
this rule.
handling of raisins produced from
The Act provides that administrative
grapes grown in California and is
proceedings must be exhausted before
administered locally by the Raisin
parties may file suit in court. Under
Administrative Committee (Committee).
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
This rule revises the requirement that
handler subject to an order may file
notification handlers must provide to
with USDA a petition stating that the
the inspection service and the
order, any provision of the order, or any
Committee when they perform certain
obligation imposed in connection with
functions on off-grade raisins be in
the order is not in accordance with law
writing, thereby allowing them to use
and request a modification of the order
other means of communication,
or to be exempted therefrom. A handler
including e-mail. This rule also removes
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
the requirement that handlers submit
on the petition. After the hearing, USDA
reports to the Committee regarding
would rule on the petition. The Act
transfers of off-grade and other failing
provides that the district court of the
raisins. This action brings the order’s
United States in any district in which
administrative rules and regulations in
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
line with current industry practices.
or her principal place of business, has
EFFECTIVE DATE: August 20, 2008.
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rose the petition, provided an action is filed
M. Aguayo, Marketing Specialist, or
not later than 20 days after the date of
Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional Manager,
the entry of the ruling.
This final rule revises requirements
California Marketing Field Office,
regarding off-grade raisins under the
Marketing Order Administration
order. This rule revises the requirement
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
that notification handlers must provide
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487–
to the Processed Products Branch, Fruit
5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906, or E-mail:
and Vegetable Programs, Agricultural
Rose.Aguayo@usda.gov or
Marketing Service (AMS), USDA
Kurt.Kimmel@usda.gov.
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:43 Jul 18, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(hereinafter referred to as the inspection
service) and the Committee when they
perform certain functions on off-grade
raisins be in writing, thereby allowing
them to use other means of
communication, including e-mail. This
rule also removes the requirement that
handlers submit reports to the
Committee regarding transfers of offgrade and other failing raisins. This
action brings the order’s administrative
rules and regulations in line with
current industry practices and was
unanimously recommended by the
Committee at a meeting on July 11,
2007.
The order provides authority for
quality control whereby handlers must
have their raisins inspected upon
receipt from producers and prior to
shipment. Handlers may receive raisins
that do not meet minimum standards.
Section 989.24(b) specifies that off-grade
raisins are raisins which do not meet the
then effective minimum grade and
condition standards for natural
condition raisins (or raisins that have
not been processed). Off-grade raisins
that cannot be successfully
reconditioned to meet the applicable
minimum grade standards for processed
raisins become other failing raisins.
Section 989.58(e) provides
requirements for off-grade raisins.
Paragraph (1) of that section specifies
that off-grade raisins may be received or
acquired by the handler, without further
inspection, in eligible non-normal
outlets (such as animal feed); be
returned unstemmed to the person
tendering the raisins (usually the
producer); or be received by the handler
for reconditioning. Off-grade raisins
received by handlers under any one of
these three categories may be changed to
any of the other categories under such
rules and procedures recommended by
the Committee and approved by the
Secretary of Agriculture (Secretary).
Paragraph (2) of that section specifies
that off-grade raisins may be transferred
from a receiving handler’s plant to
another plant of his/hers or to that of
another handler within the State of
California.
Section 989.158(c) specifies rules and
procedures for off-grade raisins.
Paragraph (2) of that section requires
that handlers notify the inspection
service in writing prior to making any
changes in off-grade raisin categories as
described above. Paragraph (3) of that
E:\FR\FM\21JYR1.SGM
21JYR1
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
42258
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 140 / Monday, July 21, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
section requires handlers to notify the
inspection service in advance and in
writing on a form provided by the
Committee, of the time they plan to
transfer lots of off-grade raisins for
reconditioning. They must also provide
the Committee this form. Paragraph (4)
of that section specifies that handlers
must notify the inspection service in
writing prior to reconditioning off-grade
raisins. Paragraph (6) of that section
requires handlers to notify the
inspection service in writing before
transferring stemmed raisins to another
handler for reconditioning, and to
obtain from the receiving handler a
statement that he or she will receive
such raisins for reconditioning. Copies
of the inspection notification and
receiving handler statement must be
forwarded by the transferring handler to
the Committee.
Section 989.73(d) of the order
provides authority for the Committee,
with approval of the Secretary, to
request other information from handlers
that may be necessary for the Committee
to perform its duties. Section
989.173(d)(2) specifies that handlers
must report to the Committee
information regarding transfers of offgrade raisins and other failing raisins,
including the date of the transfer, the
name and address of the receiving
handler and location of his or her plant,
the name and address of the tenderer of
each lot included in the transfer and the
inspection certificate numbers
applicable to the lot, and the varietal
type, net weight, and condition of the
raisins.
In the early 1990s, the inspection
service began computerizing much of
the information regarding raisin
inspections, including data regarding
off-grade raisins. These computerized
data are shared with Committee staff.
The inspection service generates reports
from this database as needed and
provides the information to handlers.
Handlers now notify the inspection
service verbally or by other means of
communication, including e-mail,
before they change off-grade raisin
categories, transfer off-grade raisins for
reconditioning, recondition off-grade
raisins, or transfer off-grade raisins that
have been stemmed to another handler
for reconditioning. Thus, it is no longer
necessary for handlers to provide such
notification in writing, too.
Likewise, it is not necessary for
handlers to submit reports to the
Committee on transfers of off-grade or
other failing raisins. As stated above, the
computerized data regarding off-grade
raisins generated by the inspection
service are shared with Committee staff.
Additionally, handlers submit other
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:43 Jul 18, 2008
Jkt 214001
weekly and monthly reports to the
Committee regarding off-grade and other
failing raisins that allows Committee
staff to track such raisins. These include
the RAC–28, Processor’s Report of
Acquisition of Off-Grade Raisins; RAC–
28A, Processor’s Report of Disposition
of Off-Grade Raisins and Raisin
Residual Material; the RAC–30, Weekly
Off-Grade Summary; the RAC–32,
Monthly Report of Dispositions of OffGrade Raisins, Other Failing Raisins and
Raisin Residual Material; the RAC–33,
Weekly Report of Disposition of
Standard Raisins Recovered from
Reconditioning of Off-Grade Raisins;
and the RAC–51 CO, Inventory of OffGrade Raisins on Hand (for organically
produced raisins). These forms will
continue to be used and are currently
approved by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under OMB No.
0581–0178, Vegetable and Specialty
Crops.
Thus, the Committee recommended
revising the order’s administrative rules
and regulations to remove these
requirements and reflect current
industry practices. Accordingly, this
rule would revise paragraphs (2), (3),
(4)(i), and (6)(ii) in § 989.158(c) and
remove paragraph (d)(2) in § 989.173.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of
this action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this
final regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are approximately 21 handlers
of California raisins who are subject to
regulation under the order and
approximately 3,000 raisin producers in
the regulated area. Small agricultural
service firms have been defined by the
Small Business Administration (13 CFR
121.201) as those having annual receipts
of less than $6,500,000, and small
agricultural producers are defined as
those having annual receipts of less than
$750,000. No more than 10 handlers,
and a majority of producers, of
California raisins may be classified as
small entities.
This final rule revises § 989.158(c)
regarding the requirement that
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
notification handlers must provide to
the inspection service and the
Committee when they perform certain
functions on off-grade raisins be in
writing, therefore, allowing them to use
other means of communication,
including e-mail. Handlers now provide
such notification verbally or by other
means of communication; written
notification is no longer necessary. This
rule also revises § 989.173(d) by
removing the requirement that handlers
must submit reports to the Committee
on transfers of off-grade and other
failing raisins. Handlers submit other
weekly and monthly reports to the
Committee regarding off-grade and other
failing raisins that allows Committee
staff to track such raisins. These changes
bring the order’s administrative rules
and regulations in line with current
industry practices. Authority for these
changes is provided in §§ 989.58(e) and
989.73(d) of the order, respectively.
Regarding the impact of this action on
producers and handlers, these changes
will not impact producers, and will
remove requirements on handlers that
are not necessary. It brings the
administrative rules and regulations in
line with current industry practices.
As an alternative, the Committee
considered maintaining the status quo.
However, this is not practical since the
requirements are no longer necessary.
Handlers now notify the inspection
service and the Committee verbally or
by other means of communication
before they perform certain functions on
off-grade raisins. Additionally, handlers
submit other weekly and monthly
reports to the Committee regarding offgrade and other failing raisins that
allows Committee staff to track such
raisins. Thus, the Committee
recommended revising the regulations
to bring them in line with current
industry practices.
This action revises reporting and
recordkeeping requirements specified in
the order’s administrative rules and
regulations for all California raisin
handlers. These requirements were
approved under OMB No. 0581–0178,
Vegetable and Specialty Crops. No
change to this approval is warranted as
a result of this action. This action brings
the regulations in line with current
industry practices. Data regarding offgrade raisins have been computerized
since the early 1990s. It is no longer
necessary for handlers to advise the
inspection service nor the Committee in
writing when they perform certain
functions regarding off-grade raisins.
Handlers provide such notification
verbally or by other means of
communication, including e-mail. The
time it takes to provide such
E:\FR\FM\21JYR1.SGM
21JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 140 / Monday, July 21, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
information is minimal. Likewise, it is
no longer necessary for handlers to
submit reports to the Committee
regarding transfers of off-grade for
reconditioning or other failing raisins.
Handlers submit other weekly and
monthly reports to the Committee
regarding off-grade and other failing
raisins that allows Committee staff to
track such raisins. As with all Federal
marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to
reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
As noted in the initial regulatory
flexibility analysis, USDA has not
identified any relevant Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap or conflict with
this final rule.
In addition, the Committee’s July 11,
2007, meeting and the Administrative
Issues Subcommittee meeting held
earlier that day were widely publicized
throughout the raisin industry. All
interested persons were invited to
attend the meetings and participate in
Committee deliberations on all issues.
Like all Committee meetings, both were
public meetings and all entities, both
large and small, were able to express
views on this issue.
A proposed rule concerning this
action was published in the Federal
Register on April 22, 2008 (72 FR
21551). Copies of the rule were mailed
or sent via facsimile to all Committee
members and raisin handlers. Finally,
the rule was made available through the
Internet by USDA and the Office of the
Federal Register. A 30-day comment
period ending May 22, 2008, was
provided to allow interested persons to
respond to the proposal. No comments
were received.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
AMSv1.0/ams.fetchTemplateData.do?
template=TemplateN&page=Marketing
OrdersSmallBusinessGuide. Any
questions about the compliance guide
should be sent to Jay Guerber at the
previously mentioned address in the
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
After consideration of all relevant
matters presented, including the
information and recommendation
submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:43 Jul 18, 2008
Jkt 214001
that this rule, as hereinafter set forth,
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 989
Grapes, Marketing agreements,
Raisins, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
I For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 989 is amended as
follows:
PART 989—RAISINS PRODUCED
FROM GRAPES GROWN IN
CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 989 continues to read as follows:
I
2. Section 989.158 is amended as
follows:
I a. In paragraph (c)(2), the second
sentence is revised, and a new sentence
is added after it;
I b. In paragraph (c)(3), the fourth
sentence is revised, and a new sentence
is added after it;
I c. In paragraph (c)(4)(i), the first
sentence is revised, and a new sentence
is added after it; and
I d. Paragraph (c)(6)(ii) is revised.
The revised and added text reads as
follows:
§ 989.158
Natural condition raisins.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) * * * Prior to making such
change, the handler shall notify the
inspection service at least one business
day in advance of the time such handler
plans to begin such change. Such
notification shall be provided verbally
or by other means of communication,
including e-mail. * * *
(3) * * * The handler shall notify the
inspection service in advance of the
time such handler plans to transfer each
lot. Such notification shall be provided
verbally or by other means of
communication, including e-mail.
* * *
(4) * * *
(i) The handler shall notify the
inspection service at least one business
day in advance of the time such handler
plans to begin reconditioning each lot of
raisins, unless a shorter period is
acceptable to the inspection service.
Such notification shall be provided
verbally or by other means of
communication, including e-mail.
* * *
*
*
*
*
*
(6) * * *
(ii) Any packer may arrange for or
permit the tenderer to remove the
stemmed raisins (described in paragraph
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(c)(6)(i) of this section), but not the
residual, directly to the premises,
within California, of another packer for
further reconditioning of the raisins at
the latter’s premises. Such removal and
transfer shall be made under the
surveillance of the inspection service.
The packer shall notify the inspection
service as required in paragraph (c)(3) of
this section. Such raisins may be
received by the other packer without
inspection. On and after such receipt of
the raisins for further reconditioning, all
applicable provisions of this part shall
apply with respect to such raisins and
the packer so receiving them.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 989.173
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
I
42259
[Amended]
3. In § 989.173, paragraph (d)(2) is
removed and reserved.
I
Dated: July 16, 2008.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. E8–16605 Filed 7–18–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2008–0733; Directorate
Identifier 2008–NM–114–AD; Amendment
39–15617; AD 2008–15–05]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing
Model 737–300, –400, and –500 Series
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Boeing Model 737–300, –400, and –500
series airplanes. This AD requires
inspecting to determine if certain
carriage spindles are installed, repetitive
inspections for corrosion and
indications of corrosion on affected
carriage spindles, and if necessary,
related investigative action and
corrective action. This AD also provides
optional terminating action. This AD
results from a report of corrosion found
on carriage spindles that are located on
the outboard trailing edge flaps. We are
issuing this AD to detect and correct
corrosion of the carriage spindle, which
could result in fracture. Fracture of both
the inboard and outboard carriage
spindles, in the forward ends through
E:\FR\FM\21JYR1.SGM
21JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 140 (Monday, July 21, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 42257-42259]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-16605]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 140 / Monday, July 21, 2008 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 42257]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 989
[Docket No. AMS-FV-07-0117; FV07-989-4 FR]
Raisins Produced From Grapes Grown In California; Revisions to
Requirements Regarding Off-Grade Raisins
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule revises requirements regarding off-grade raisins
under the Federal marketing order for California raisins (order). The
order regulates the handling of raisins produced from grapes grown in
California and is administered locally by the Raisin Administrative
Committee (Committee). This rule revises the requirement that
notification handlers must provide to the inspection service and the
Committee when they perform certain functions on off-grade raisins be
in writing, thereby allowing them to use other means of communication,
including e-mail. This rule also removes the requirement that handlers
submit reports to the Committee regarding transfers of off-grade and
other failing raisins. This action brings the order's administrative
rules and regulations in line with current industry practices.
EFFECTIVE DATE: August 20, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rose M. Aguayo, Marketing Specialist,
or Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional Manager, California Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax: (559) 487-5906, or E-mail:
Rose.Aguayo@usda.gov or Kurt.Kimmel@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202)
720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail: Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement and Order No. 989 (7 CFR part 989), both as amended,
regulating the handling of raisins produced from grapes grown in
California, hereinafter referred to as the ``order.'' The order is
effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as
amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive
effect. This final rule will not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they present an irreconcilable
conflict with this rule.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This final rule revises requirements regarding off-grade raisins
under the order. This rule revises the requirement that notification
handlers must provide to the Processed Products Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS), USDA
(hereinafter referred to as the inspection service) and the Committee
when they perform certain functions on off-grade raisins be in writing,
thereby allowing them to use other means of communication, including e-
mail. This rule also removes the requirement that handlers submit
reports to the Committee regarding transfers of off-grade and other
failing raisins. This action brings the order's administrative rules
and regulations in line with current industry practices and was
unanimously recommended by the Committee at a meeting on July 11, 2007.
The order provides authority for quality control whereby handlers
must have their raisins inspected upon receipt from producers and prior
to shipment. Handlers may receive raisins that do not meet minimum
standards. Section 989.24(b) specifies that off-grade raisins are
raisins which do not meet the then effective minimum grade and
condition standards for natural condition raisins (or raisins that have
not been processed). Off-grade raisins that cannot be successfully
reconditioned to meet the applicable minimum grade standards for
processed raisins become other failing raisins.
Section 989.58(e) provides requirements for off-grade raisins.
Paragraph (1) of that section specifies that off-grade raisins may be
received or acquired by the handler, without further inspection, in
eligible non-normal outlets (such as animal feed); be returned
unstemmed to the person tendering the raisins (usually the producer);
or be received by the handler for reconditioning. Off-grade raisins
received by handlers under any one of these three categories may be
changed to any of the other categories under such rules and procedures
recommended by the Committee and approved by the Secretary of
Agriculture (Secretary). Paragraph (2) of that section specifies that
off-grade raisins may be transferred from a receiving handler's plant
to another plant of his/hers or to that of another handler within the
State of California.
Section 989.158(c) specifies rules and procedures for off-grade
raisins. Paragraph (2) of that section requires that handlers notify
the inspection service in writing prior to making any changes in off-
grade raisin categories as described above. Paragraph (3) of that
[[Page 42258]]
section requires handlers to notify the inspection service in advance
and in writing on a form provided by the Committee, of the time they
plan to transfer lots of off-grade raisins for reconditioning. They
must also provide the Committee this form. Paragraph (4) of that
section specifies that handlers must notify the inspection service in
writing prior to reconditioning off-grade raisins. Paragraph (6) of
that section requires handlers to notify the inspection service in
writing before transferring stemmed raisins to another handler for
reconditioning, and to obtain from the receiving handler a statement
that he or she will receive such raisins for reconditioning. Copies of
the inspection notification and receiving handler statement must be
forwarded by the transferring handler to the Committee.
Section 989.73(d) of the order provides authority for the
Committee, with approval of the Secretary, to request other information
from handlers that may be necessary for the Committee to perform its
duties. Section 989.173(d)(2) specifies that handlers must report to
the Committee information regarding transfers of off-grade raisins and
other failing raisins, including the date of the transfer, the name and
address of the receiving handler and location of his or her plant, the
name and address of the tenderer of each lot included in the transfer
and the inspection certificate numbers applicable to the lot, and the
varietal type, net weight, and condition of the raisins.
In the early 1990s, the inspection service began computerizing much
of the information regarding raisin inspections, including data
regarding off-grade raisins. These computerized data are shared with
Committee staff. The inspection service generates reports from this
database as needed and provides the information to handlers. Handlers
now notify the inspection service verbally or by other means of
communication, including e-mail, before they change off-grade raisin
categories, transfer off-grade raisins for reconditioning, recondition
off-grade raisins, or transfer off-grade raisins that have been stemmed
to another handler for reconditioning. Thus, it is no longer necessary
for handlers to provide such notification in writing, too.
Likewise, it is not necessary for handlers to submit reports to the
Committee on transfers of off-grade or other failing raisins. As stated
above, the computerized data regarding off-grade raisins generated by
the inspection service are shared with Committee staff. Additionally,
handlers submit other weekly and monthly reports to the Committee
regarding off-grade and other failing raisins that allows Committee
staff to track such raisins. These include the RAC-28, Processor's
Report of Acquisition of Off-Grade Raisins; RAC-28A, Processor's Report
of Disposition of Off-Grade Raisins and Raisin Residual Material; the
RAC-30, Weekly Off-Grade Summary; the RAC-32, Monthly Report of
Dispositions of Off-Grade Raisins, Other Failing Raisins and Raisin
Residual Material; the RAC-33, Weekly Report of Disposition of Standard
Raisins Recovered from Reconditioning of Off-Grade Raisins; and the
RAC-51 CO, Inventory of Off-Grade Raisins on Hand (for organically
produced raisins). These forms will continue to be used and are
currently approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under
OMB No. 0581-0178, Vegetable and Specialty Crops.
Thus, the Committee recommended revising the order's administrative
rules and regulations to remove these requirements and reflect current
industry practices. Accordingly, this rule would revise paragraphs (2),
(3), (4)(i), and (6)(ii) in Sec. 989.158(c) and remove paragraph
(d)(2) in Sec. 989.173.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the
economic impact of this action on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this final regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and rules issued thereunder, are unique in that
they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 21 handlers of California raisins who are
subject to regulation under the order and approximately 3,000 raisin
producers in the regulated area. Small agricultural service firms have
been defined by the Small Business Administration (13 CFR 121.201) as
those having annual receipts of less than $6,500,000, and small
agricultural producers are defined as those having annual receipts of
less than $750,000. No more than 10 handlers, and a majority of
producers, of California raisins may be classified as small entities.
This final rule revises Sec. 989.158(c) regarding the requirement
that notification handlers must provide to the inspection service and
the Committee when they perform certain functions on off-grade raisins
be in writing, therefore, allowing them to use other means of
communication, including e-mail. Handlers now provide such notification
verbally or by other means of communication; written notification is no
longer necessary. This rule also revises Sec. 989.173(d) by removing
the requirement that handlers must submit reports to the Committee on
transfers of off-grade and other failing raisins. Handlers submit other
weekly and monthly reports to the Committee regarding off-grade and
other failing raisins that allows Committee staff to track such
raisins. These changes bring the order's administrative rules and
regulations in line with current industry practices. Authority for
these changes is provided in Sec. Sec. 989.58(e) and 989.73(d) of the
order, respectively.
Regarding the impact of this action on producers and handlers,
these changes will not impact producers, and will remove requirements
on handlers that are not necessary. It brings the administrative rules
and regulations in line with current industry practices.
As an alternative, the Committee considered maintaining the status
quo. However, this is not practical since the requirements are no
longer necessary. Handlers now notify the inspection service and the
Committee verbally or by other means of communication before they
perform certain functions on off-grade raisins. Additionally, handlers
submit other weekly and monthly reports to the Committee regarding off-
grade and other failing raisins that allows Committee staff to track
such raisins. Thus, the Committee recommended revising the regulations
to bring them in line with current industry practices.
This action revises reporting and recordkeeping requirements
specified in the order's administrative rules and regulations for all
California raisin handlers. These requirements were approved under OMB
No. 0581-0178, Vegetable and Specialty Crops. No change to this
approval is warranted as a result of this action. This action brings
the regulations in line with current industry practices. Data regarding
off-grade raisins have been computerized since the early 1990s. It is
no longer necessary for handlers to advise the inspection service nor
the Committee in writing when they perform certain functions regarding
off-grade raisins. Handlers provide such notification verbally or by
other means of communication, including e-mail. The time it takes to
provide such
[[Page 42259]]
information is minimal. Likewise, it is no longer necessary for
handlers to submit reports to the Committee regarding transfers of off-
grade for reconditioning or other failing raisins. Handlers submit
other weekly and monthly reports to the Committee regarding off-grade
and other failing raisins that allows Committee staff to track such
raisins. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
As noted in the initial regulatory flexibility analysis, USDA has
not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap or
conflict with this final rule.
In addition, the Committee's July 11, 2007, meeting and the
Administrative Issues Subcommittee meeting held earlier that day were
widely publicized throughout the raisin industry. All interested
persons were invited to attend the meetings and participate in
Committee deliberations on all issues. Like all Committee meetings,
both were public meetings and all entities, both large and small, were
able to express views on this issue.
A proposed rule concerning this action was published in the Federal
Register on April 22, 2008 (72 FR 21551). Copies of the rule were
mailed or sent via facsimile to all Committee members and raisin
handlers. Finally, the rule was made available through the Internet by
USDA and the Office of the Federal Register. A 30-day comment period
ending May 22, 2008, was provided to allow interested persons to
respond to the proposal. No comments were received.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: http:/
/www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/
ams.fetchTemplateData.do?template=TemplateN&page=MarketingOrdersSmallBus
inessGuide. Any questions about the compliance guide should be sent to
Jay Guerber at the previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant matters presented, including
the information and recommendation submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as
hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 989
Grapes, Marketing agreements, Raisins, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 989 is amended as
follows:
PART 989--RAISINS PRODUCED FROM GRAPES GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 989 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
0
2. Section 989.158 is amended as follows:
0
a. In paragraph (c)(2), the second sentence is revised, and a new
sentence is added after it;
0
b. In paragraph (c)(3), the fourth sentence is revised, and a new
sentence is added after it;
0
c. In paragraph (c)(4)(i), the first sentence is revised, and a new
sentence is added after it; and
0
d. Paragraph (c)(6)(ii) is revised.
The revised and added text reads as follows:
Sec. 989.158 Natural condition raisins.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) * * * Prior to making such change, the handler shall notify the
inspection service at least one business day in advance of the time
such handler plans to begin such change. Such notification shall be
provided verbally or by other means of communication, including e-mail.
* * *
(3) * * * The handler shall notify the inspection service in
advance of the time such handler plans to transfer each lot. Such
notification shall be provided verbally or by other means of
communication, including e-mail. * * *
(4) * * *
(i) The handler shall notify the inspection service at least one
business day in advance of the time such handler plans to begin
reconditioning each lot of raisins, unless a shorter period is
acceptable to the inspection service. Such notification shall be
provided verbally or by other means of communication, including e-mail.
* * *
* * * * *
(6) * * *
(ii) Any packer may arrange for or permit the tenderer to remove
the stemmed raisins (described in paragraph (c)(6)(i) of this section),
but not the residual, directly to the premises, within California, of
another packer for further reconditioning of the raisins at the
latter's premises. Such removal and transfer shall be made under the
surveillance of the inspection service. The packer shall notify the
inspection service as required in paragraph (c)(3) of this section.
Such raisins may be received by the other packer without inspection. On
and after such receipt of the raisins for further reconditioning, all
applicable provisions of this part shall apply with respect to such
raisins and the packer so receiving them.
* * * * *
Sec. 989.173 [Amended]
0
3. In Sec. 989.173, paragraph (d)(2) is removed and reserved.
Dated: July 16, 2008.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. E8-16605 Filed 7-18-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P