Migratory Bird Permits; Addresses for Applications for Eagle and Migratory Bird Permit Applications, 42279-42281 [E8-16526]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 140 / Monday, July 21, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
(2) The Arms Export Control Act of 1976
(22 U.S.C. 2751 et seq.);
(3) The International Emergency Economic
Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1707);
(4) The Export Administration Regulations
(15 CFR Parts 730–774);
(5) The International Traffic in Arms
Regulations (22 CFR Parts 120–130);
(6) Executive Order 13222, as extended;
(7) DoD Directive 2040.2, International
Transfers of Technology, Goods, Services,
and Munitions; and
(8) DoD Industrial Security Regulation
(DoD 5220.22–R).
(f) The Contractor shall include the
substance of this clause, including this
paragraph (f), in all subcontracts that are
expected to involve access to or generation of
export-controlled items.
(End of clause)
252.235–7002, 252.235–7003, 252.235–
7010, and 252.235–7011 [Amended]
I 6. Sections 252.235–7002, 252.235–
7003, 252.235–7010, and 252.235–7011
are amended in the introductory text by
removing ‘‘235.071’’ and adding in its
place ‘‘235.072’’.
[FR Doc. E8–16673 Filed 7–18–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–08–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 13
RIN 1018–AV63
252.204–7009 Requirements regarding
potential access to export-controlled items.
As prescribed in 204.7305(b), use the
following clause:
Migratory Bird Permits; Addresses for
Applications for Eagle and Migratory
Bird Permit Applications
AGENCY:
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
Requirements Regarding Potential Access to
Export-Controlled Items (Jul 2008)
(a) Definition. Export-controlled items, as
used in this clause, means items subject to
the Export Administration Regulations (EAR)
(15 CFR Parts 730–774) or the International
Traffic in Arms Regulations (22 CFR Parts
120–130). The term includes:
(1) Defense items, defined in the Arms
Export Control Act, 22 U.S.C. 2778(j)(4)(A),
as defense articles, defense services, and
related technical data. The term ‘‘defense
items’’ includes information and technology.
(2) Items, defined in the EAR as
‘‘commodities, software, and technology,’’
terms that are also defined in the EAR, 15
CFR 772.1. Regarding the release of items
subject to the EAR to foreign nationals within
the United States, ‘‘items’’ only include
technology and software source code (and
not commodities) subject to the EAR.
(b) The parties do not anticipate that, in the
performance of this contract, the Contractor
will generate or need access to exportcontrolled items.
(c) If, during the performance of this
contract, the Contractor becomes aware that
the Contractor will generate or need access to
export-controlled items—
(1) The Contractor shall notify the
Contracting Officer in writing; and
(2) The Contracting Officer will
expeditiously—
(i) Modify the contract to include the
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation
Supplement clause 252.204–7008,
Requirements for Contracts Involving ExportControlled Items;
(ii) Negotiate a contract modification that
eliminates the requirement for performance
of work that would involve export-controlled
items; or
(iii) Terminate the contract, in whole or in
part, as may be appropriate, for the
convenience of the Government, in
accordance with the Termination clause of
the contract.
(End of clause)
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:43 Jul 18, 2008
Jkt 214001
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: We correct omissions in our
list of addresses the public can use to
submit permit applications to conduct
activities with migratory birds or with
bald eagles or golden eagles.
DATES: This rule is effective on July 21,
2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
George T. Allen, Wildlife Biologist,
Division of Migratory Bird Management,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 703–
358–1825.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
We are the Federal agency delegated
the primary responsibility for managing
migratory birds, as authorized by the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) (16
U.S.C. 703 et seq.), which implements
conventions with Great Britain (for
Canada), Mexico, Japan, and the Soviet
Union (Russia).
We correct omissions of States,
territories, and possessions in 50 CFR
13.11(b)(5), in which we have listed
addresses for the public to use to submit
permit applications to conduct activities
with migratory birds or with bald eagles
or golden eagles.
Section 553 of the Administrative
Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B),
provides that, when an agency for good
cause finds that notice and public
procedure are impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest, an agency may issue a rule
without providing notice and an
opportunity for public comment. We
have determined that there is good
cause for making today’s rule final
without prior proposal and opportunity
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
42279
for comment because we are merely
making administrative corrections to
omissions in the lists of States,
territories, and possessions we include
in our regulations with our addresses for
the public to use to request or submit
permit applications for activities with
bald or golden eagles or migratory birds.
Further, it is in the public’s best interest
to have access to these corrected lists as
soon as possible. Thus, notice and
public procedure are unnecessary. We
find that this constitutes good cause
under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B). Moreover,
since today’s action does not create any
new regulatory requirements, we find
that good cause exists to provide for an
immediate effective date pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 553(d)(3).
Required Determinations
Regulatory Planning and Review
In accordance with the criteria in E.O.
12866, this rule is not a significant
regulatory action. The Office of
Management and Budget makes the final
determination of significance under E.O.
12866.
a. This rule does not have an annual
economic effect of $100 million or more,
or adversely affect an economic sector,
productivity, jobs, the environment, or
other units of government. A costbenefit and economic analysis thus is
not required. There are no costs
associated with this rule.
b. This rule does not create
inconsistencies with other agencies’
actions. The rule deals solely with
governance of migratory bird permitting
in the United States. No other Federal
agency has any role in regulating
activities with migratory birds.
c. This rule does not materially affect
entitlements, grants, user fees, loan
programs, or the rights and obligations
of their recipients. There are no
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs associated with the regulation
of migratory birds.
d. This rule does not raise novel legal
or policy issues. The regulations change
is in compliance with other laws,
policies, and regulations.
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.)
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., as amended by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act (SBREFA) of 1996 (Pub. L.
104–121)), whenever an agency is
required to publish a notice of
rulemaking for any proposed or final
rule, it must prepare and make available
for public comment a regulatory
flexibility analysis that describes the
effect of the rule on small entities (i.e.,
E:\FR\FM\21JYR1.SGM
21JYR1
42280
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 140 / Monday, July 21, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
small businesses, small organizations,
and small government jurisdictions).
However, no regulatory flexibility
analysis is required if the head of an
agency certifies the rule does not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
SBREFA amended the Regulatory
Flexibility Act to require Federal
agencies to provide the statement of the
factual basis for certifying that a rule
does not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. We have examined this rule’s
potential effects on small entities as
required by the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, and have determined that this
action does not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities, because the
changes simplify/clarify application
addresses for the public.
There are no costs associated with
this regulations change. Consequently,
we certify that because this rule does
not have a significant economic effect
on a substantial number of small
entities, a regulatory flexibility analysis
is not required.
This rule is not a major rule under
SBREFA (5 U.S.C. 804(2)). It does not
have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
a. This rule does not have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million
or more.
b. This rule does not cause a major
increase in costs or prices for
consumers; individual industries;
Federal, State, or local government
agencies; or geographic regions.
c. This rule does not have significant
adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity,
innovation, or the ability of U.S.-based
enterprises to compete with foreignbased enterprises.
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
In accordance with the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1501 et
seq.), we have determined the following:
a. This rule does not ‘‘significantly or
uniquely’’ affect small governments. A
small government agency plan is not
required. This rule does not affect small
government activities in any significant
way.
b. This rule does not produce a
Federal mandate of $100 million or
greater in any year; i.e., it is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act.
Takings
In accordance with E.O. 12630, the
rule does not have significant takings
implications because it does not contain
a provision for taking of private
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:43 Jul 18, 2008
Jkt 214001
property. Therefore, a takings
implication assessment is not required.
Federalism
This rule does not have sufficient
Federalism effects to warrant
preparation of a Federalism assessment
under E.O. 13132. It does not interfere
with the States’ ability to manage their
programs or their funds. No significant
economic impacts will result from
correcting the listings of Migratory Bird
Permits offices and the areas for which
they are responsible.
Civil Justice Reform
In accordance with E.O. 12988, the
Office of the Solicitor has determined
that the rule does not unduly burden the
judicial system and that it meets the
requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of the Order.
Paperwork Reduction Act
We examined these regulations under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.). There are no new
information collection requirements
associated with this rule. We may not
collect or sponsor, nor is a person
required to respond to a collection of
information unless it displays a
currently valid Office of Management
and Budget control number.
National Environmental Policy Act
We have analyzed this rule in
accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), 42
U.S.C. 432–437(f), and Part 516 of the
U.S. Department of the Interior Manual
(516 DM). This regulations change
correcting the listing of States,
territories, and possessions does not
have any environmental impact.
Environmental Consequences of the
Action
Socioeconomic. This rule does not
have any socioeconomic impacts.
Migratory bird populations. This rule
does not affect migratory bird
populations.
Endangered and threatened species.
The regulation is administrative, and
does not affect threatened or endangered
species or critical habitats.
Compliance With Endangered Species
Act Requirements
Section 7 of the Endangered Species
Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), requires that ‘‘The
Secretary [of the Interior] shall review
other programs administered by him
and utilize such programs in
furtherance of the purposes of this
chapter’’ (16 U.S.C. 1536(a)(1)). It
further states that the Secretary must
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
‘‘insure that any action authorized,
funded, or carried out * * * is not
likely to jeopardize the continued
existence of any endangered species or
threatened species or result in the
destruction or adverse modification of
[critical] habitat ’’ (16 U.S.C. 1536
(a)(2)). The regulations change does not
affect listed species in any way.
Government-to-Government
Relationship With Tribes
In accordance with the President’s
memorandum of April 29, 1994,
‘‘Government-to-Government Relations
with Native American Tribal
Governments’’ (59 FR 22951), E.O.
13175, and 512 DM 2, we have
determined that there are no potential
effects of this rule on Federally
recognized Indian Tribes. This rule does
not interfere with the Tribes’ ability to
manage themselves or their funds, or to
regulate migratory bird activities on
Tribal lands.
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
(E.O. 13211)
On May 18, 2001, the President issued
E.O. 13211 addressing regulations that
significantly affect energy supply,
distribution, and use. E.O. 13211
requires agencies to prepare Statements
of Energy Effects when undertaking
certain actions. This regulations change
is not a significant regulatory action
under E.O. 12866, and does not affect
energy supplies, distribution, or use.
Therefore, this action is not a significant
energy action and no Statement of
Energy Effects is required.
Author
The author of this rulemaking is Dr.
George T. Allen, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Division of Migratory Bird
Management, 4401 North Fairfax Drive,
Mail Stop 4107, Arlington, VA 22203–
1610.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 13
Administrative practice and
procedure, Exports, Fish, Imports,
Plants, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Transportation, Wildlife.
I For the reasons stated in the preamble,
we amend part 13 of subchapter B,
chapter I, title 50 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, as follows.
PART 13—GENERAL PERMIT
PROCEDURES
1. The authority for Part 13 continues
to read as follows:
I
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 668a, 704, 712, 742j–
l, 1374(g), 1382, 1538(d), 1539, 1540(f), 3374,
4901–4916; 18 U.S.C. 42; 19 U.S.C. 1202; 31
U.S.C. 9701.
E:\FR\FM\21JYR1.SGM
21JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 140 / Monday, July 21, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
2. Amend § 13.11(b)(5) by revising the
entries for Region 1 and Region 4 to read
as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(5) * * *
Region 1 (CA, HI, ID, NV, OR, WA,
American Samoa, Guam,
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
I
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:43 Jul 18, 2008
Jkt 214001
Islands, and other Pacific possessions):
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Migratory Bird Permit Office, 911 N.E.
11th Avenue, Portland, OR 97232–4181.
*
*
*
*
*
Region 4 (AL, AR, FL, GA, KY, LA, MS,
NC, SC, TN, PR, VI, and Caribbean
possessions): U.S. Fish and Wildlife
PO 00000
Service, Migratory Bird Permit Office,
P.O. Box 49208, Atlanta, GA 30359.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: July 2, 2008.
David M. Verhey,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Fish and
Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. E8–16526 Filed 7–18–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
42281
E:\FR\FM\21JYR1.SGM
21JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 140 (Monday, July 21, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 42279-42281]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-16526]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 13
RIN 1018-AV63
Migratory Bird Permits; Addresses for Applications for Eagle and
Migratory Bird Permit Applications
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We correct omissions in our list of addresses the public can
use to submit permit applications to conduct activities with migratory
birds or with bald eagles or golden eagles.
DATES: This rule is effective on July 21, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. George T. Allen, Wildlife
Biologist, Division of Migratory Bird Management, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, 703-358-1825.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
We are the Federal agency delegated the primary responsibility for
managing migratory birds, as authorized by the Migratory Bird Treaty
Act (MBTA) (16 U.S.C. 703 et seq.), which implements conventions with
Great Britain (for Canada), Mexico, Japan, and the Soviet Union
(Russia).
We correct omissions of States, territories, and possessions in 50
CFR 13.11(b)(5), in which we have listed addresses for the public to
use to submit permit applications to conduct activities with migratory
birds or with bald eagles or golden eagles.
Section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), provides that, when an agency for good cause finds that
notice and public procedure are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest, an agency may issue a rule without providing
notice and an opportunity for public comment. We have determined that
there is good cause for making today's rule final without prior
proposal and opportunity for comment because we are merely making
administrative corrections to omissions in the lists of States,
territories, and possessions we include in our regulations with our
addresses for the public to use to request or submit permit
applications for activities with bald or golden eagles or migratory
birds. Further, it is in the public's best interest to have access to
these corrected lists as soon as possible. Thus, notice and public
procedure are unnecessary. We find that this constitutes good cause
under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B). Moreover, since today's action does not
create any new regulatory requirements, we find that good cause exists
to provide for an immediate effective date pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3).
Required Determinations
Regulatory Planning and Review
In accordance with the criteria in E.O. 12866, this rule is not a
significant regulatory action. The Office of Management and Budget
makes the final determination of significance under E.O. 12866.
a. This rule does not have an annual economic effect of $100
million or more, or adversely affect an economic sector, productivity,
jobs, the environment, or other units of government. A cost-benefit and
economic analysis thus is not required. There are no costs associated
with this rule.
b. This rule does not create inconsistencies with other agencies'
actions. The rule deals solely with governance of migratory bird
permitting in the United States. No other Federal agency has any role
in regulating activities with migratory birds.
c. This rule does not materially affect entitlements, grants, user
fees, loan programs, or the rights and obligations of their recipients.
There are no entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs
associated with the regulation of migratory birds.
d. This rule does not raise novel legal or policy issues. The
regulations change is in compliance with other laws, policies, and
regulations.
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.)
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., as
amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
(SBREFA) of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121)), whenever an agency is required to
publish a notice of rulemaking for any proposed or final rule, it must
prepare and make available for public comment a regulatory flexibility
analysis that describes the effect of the rule on small entities (i.e.,
[[Page 42280]]
small businesses, small organizations, and small government
jurisdictions). However, no regulatory flexibility analysis is required
if the head of an agency certifies the rule does not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
SBREFA amended the Regulatory Flexibility Act to require Federal
agencies to provide the statement of the factual basis for certifying
that a rule does not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. We have examined this rule's
potential effects on small entities as required by the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, and have determined that this action does not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities,
because the changes simplify/clarify application addresses for the
public.
There are no costs associated with this regulations change.
Consequently, we certify that because this rule does not have a
significant economic effect on a substantial number of small entities,
a regulatory flexibility analysis is not required.
This rule is not a major rule under SBREFA (5 U.S.C. 804(2)). It
does not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
a. This rule does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more.
b. This rule does not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers; individual industries; Federal, State, or local government
agencies; or geographic regions.
c. This rule does not have significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the
ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based
enterprises.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
In accordance with the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1501
et seq.), we have determined the following:
a. This rule does not ``significantly or uniquely'' affect small
governments. A small government agency plan is not required. This rule
does not affect small government activities in any significant way.
b. This rule does not produce a Federal mandate of $100 million or
greater in any year; i.e., it is not a ``significant regulatory
action'' under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act.
Takings
In accordance with E.O. 12630, the rule does not have significant
takings implications because it does not contain a provision for taking
of private property. Therefore, a takings implication assessment is not
required.
Federalism
This rule does not have sufficient Federalism effects to warrant
preparation of a Federalism assessment under E.O. 13132. It does not
interfere with the States' ability to manage their programs or their
funds. No significant economic impacts will result from correcting the
listings of Migratory Bird Permits offices and the areas for which they
are responsible.
Civil Justice Reform
In accordance with E.O. 12988, the Office of the Solicitor has
determined that the rule does not unduly burden the judicial system and
that it meets the requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of the
Order.
Paperwork Reduction Act
We examined these regulations under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). There are no new information collection
requirements associated with this rule. We may not collect or sponsor,
nor is a person required to respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget
control number.
National Environmental Policy Act
We have analyzed this rule in accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. 432-437(f), and Part 516 of
the U.S. Department of the Interior Manual (516 DM). This regulations
change correcting the listing of States, territories, and possessions
does not have any environmental impact.
Environmental Consequences of the Action
Socioeconomic. This rule does not have any socioeconomic impacts.
Migratory bird populations. This rule does not affect migratory
bird populations.
Endangered and threatened species. The regulation is
administrative, and does not affect threatened or endangered species or
critical habitats.
Compliance With Endangered Species Act Requirements
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), requires that ``The Secretary [of the
Interior] shall review other programs administered by him and utilize
such programs in furtherance of the purposes of this chapter'' (16
U.S.C. 1536(a)(1)). It further states that the Secretary must ``insure
that any action authorized, funded, or carried out * * * is not likely
to jeopardize the continued existence of any endangered species or
threatened species or result in the destruction or adverse modification
of [critical] habitat '' (16 U.S.C. 1536 (a)(2)). The regulations
change does not affect listed species in any way.
Government-to-Government Relationship With Tribes
In accordance with the President's memorandum of April 29, 1994,
``Government-to-Government Relations with Native American Tribal
Governments'' (59 FR 22951), E.O. 13175, and 512 DM 2, we have
determined that there are no potential effects of this rule on
Federally recognized Indian Tribes. This rule does not interfere with
the Tribes' ability to manage themselves or their funds, or to regulate
migratory bird activities on Tribal lands.
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use (E.O. 13211)
On May 18, 2001, the President issued E.O. 13211 addressing
regulations that significantly affect energy supply, distribution, and
use. E.O. 13211 requires agencies to prepare Statements of Energy
Effects when undertaking certain actions. This regulations change is
not a significant regulatory action under E.O. 12866, and does not
affect energy supplies, distribution, or use. Therefore, this action is
not a significant energy action and no Statement of Energy Effects is
required.
Author
The author of this rulemaking is Dr. George T. Allen, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Division of Migratory Bird Management, 4401 North
Fairfax Drive, Mail Stop 4107, Arlington, VA 22203-1610.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 13
Administrative practice and procedure, Exports, Fish, Imports,
Plants, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Transportation,
Wildlife.
0
For the reasons stated in the preamble, we amend part 13 of subchapter
B, chapter I, title 50 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as follows.
PART 13--GENERAL PERMIT PROCEDURES
0
1. The authority for Part 13 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 668a, 704, 712, 742j-l, 1374(g), 1382,
1538(d), 1539, 1540(f), 3374, 4901-4916; 18 U.S.C. 42; 19 U.S.C.
1202; 31 U.S.C. 9701.
[[Page 42281]]
0
2. Amend Sec. 13.11(b)(5) by revising the entries for Region 1 and
Region 4 to read as follows:
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(5) * * *
Region 1 (CA, HI, ID, NV, OR, WA, American Samoa, Guam, Commonwealth of
the Northern Mariana Islands, and other Pacific possessions): U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, Migratory Bird Permit Office, 911 N.E. 11th
Avenue, Portland, OR 97232-4181.
* * * * *
Region 4 (AL, AR, FL, GA, KY, LA, MS, NC, SC, TN, PR, VI, and Caribbean
possessions): U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Migratory Bird Permit
Office, P.O. Box 49208, Atlanta, GA 30359.
* * * * *
Dated: July 2, 2008.
David M. Verhey,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. E8-16526 Filed 7-18-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P