Amendment to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations: Renewal of Registration, 41258-41259 [E8-16537]

Download as PDF 41258 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 139 / Friday, July 18, 2008 / Rules and Regulations Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice Reform The Department has reviewed the regulations in light of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order No. 12988 to eliminate ambiguity, minimize litigation, establish clear legal standards, and reduce burden. The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq., Federal agencies must obtain approval from OMB for most collections of information they conduct, sponsor, or require through regulation. The Department of State has determined that this rule does not require new collection of information for purposes of the PRA. List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 7 Board of Appellate Review. List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 50 Citizenship, Nationality, Loss of Nationality. I Accordingly, under the authority of 22 U.S.C. 2651a, for the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Department amends 22 CFR chapter I as follows: PART 7—[REMOVED AND RESERVED] I 1. Part 7 is removed and reserved. PART 50—NATIONALITY PROCEDURES—[AMENDED] 2. The authority citation for part 50 is revised to read as follows: I Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2651a; 8 U.S.C. 1104 and 1401 through 1504. I 3. Revise § 50.51 to read as follows: rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES § 50.51 Review of finding of loss of nationality. (a) There are no prescribed ‘‘procedures for administrative appeal’’ of issuance of a Certificate of Loss of Nationality for purposes of § 358 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1501) and no mandatory administrative review procedure prior to resort to judicial processes under § 360 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1503). Nevertheless, the Department may in its discretion review determinations of loss of nationality at any time after approval of issuance of the Certificate of Loss of Nationality to ensure consistency with governing law (see INA §§ 349 and 356, 8 U.S.C. 1481 and 1488). Such reconsideration may be initiated at the request of the person concerned or another person determined in accordance with guidance issued by the Department to have a legitimate interest. VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:19 Jul 17, 2008 Jkt 214001 (b) The primary grounds on which the Department will consider reversing a finding of loss of nationality and vacating a Certificate of Loss of Nationality are: (1) The law under which the finding of loss was made has been held unconstitutional; or (2) A major change in the interpretation of the law of expatriation is made as a result of a U.S. Supreme Court decision; or (3) A major change in the interpretation of the law of expatriation is made by the Department, or is made by a court or another agency and adopted by the Department; and/or (4) The person presents substantial new evidence, not previously considered, of involuntariness or absence of intent at the time of the expatriating act. (c) When the Department reverses a finding of loss of nationality, the person concerned shall be considered not to have lost U.S. nationality as of the time the expatriating act was committed, and the Certificate of Loss of Nationality shall be vacated. (d) Requesting the Department to reverse a finding of loss of nationality and vacate a Certificate of Loss of Nationality is not a prescribed ‘‘procedure for administrative appeal’’ for purposes of § 358 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1501). The Department’s decision in response to such a request is not a prescribed ‘‘procedure for administrative appeal’’ for purposes of § 358 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1501). The issuance of a Certificate of Loss of Nationality by the Department is a ‘‘final administrative determination’’ and ‘‘final administrative denial’’ for purposes of §§ 358 and 360 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1501 and 1503), respectively. Dated: July 9, 2008. Janice L. Jacobs, Assistant Secretary of State, Consular Affairs, Department of State. [FR Doc. E8–16247 Filed 7–17–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4710–06–P DEPARTMENT OF STATE 22 CFR Part 122 [Public Notice 6300] RIN 1400–AC50 Amendment to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations: Renewal of Registration Department of State. Final rule. AGENCY: ACTION: PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 SUMMARY: The Department of State is amending the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) by revising the validity period for registration and by limiting the time frame in which a registration may be renewed. DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective on July 18, 2008. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia Slygh, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, Bureau of PoliticalMilitary Affairs, Department of State, (202) 663–2830 or FAX (202) 261–8199; E-mail DDTCResponseTeam@state.gov, ATTN: Regulatory Change, ITAR Part 122. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) is revising 22 CFR 122.3 to limit the registration period to one year, instead of up to two years for both new registrants and for those renewing their registration. Registrants will be required to submit renewal packages no more than 60 days prior to their current expiration date. Regulatory Analysis and Notices Administrative Procedure Act: This amendment involves a foreign affairs function of the United States and, therefore, is not subject to the procedures contained in 5 U.S.C. 553 and 554. Regulatory Flexibility Act: Because this rule is exempt from notice and comment rulemaking under 5 U.S.C. 553, it is exempt from the regulatory flexibility analysis requirements set forth in sections 603 and 604 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 603 and 604). Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995: This amendment does not involve a mandate that will result in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more in any year and it will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996: This amendment has not been found to be a major rule within the meaning of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. Executive Orders 12372 and 13132: This amendment will not have substantial effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in E:\FR\FM\18JYR1.SGM 18JYR1 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 139 / Friday, July 18, 2008 / Rules and Regulations accordance with Executive Order 13132, it is determined that this amendment does not have sufficient federalism implications to require consultations or warrant the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement. Executive Order 12372, regarding intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and activities, does not apply to this amendment. Executive Order 12866: This amendment is exempt from the review under Executive Order 12866, but has been reviewed internally by the Department of State to ensure consistency with the purposes thereof. Executive Order 12988: The Department of State has reviewed the proposed regulations in light of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988 to eliminate ambiguity, minimize litigation, establish clear legal standards, and reduce burden. Paperwork Reduction Act: This rule does not impose any new reporting or recordkeeping requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35. List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 122 Arms and munitions, Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. I Accordingly, for the reasons set forth above, Title 22, Chapter I, Subchapter M, Part 122 is amended as follows: PART 122—REGISTRATION OF MANUFACTURERS AND EXPORTERS 1. The authority citation for Part 122 continues to read as follows: I DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY I Internal Revenue Service [TD 9391] RIN 1545–BF85 Source Rules Involving U.S. Possessions and Other Conforming Changes; Correction Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. ACTION: Correcting amendment. AGENCY: SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to final regulations (TD 9391) that were published in the Federal Register on Wednesday, April 9, 2008 (73 FR 19350) providing rules under section 937(b) of the Internal Revenue Code for determining whether income is derived from sources within a U.S. possession or territory specified in section 937(a)(1) (generally referred to in this preamble as a ‘‘territory’’) and whether income is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within a territory. DATES: This correction is effective July 18, 2008, and is applicable on April 9, 2008. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: J. David Varley, (202) 622–7790 (not a tollfree number). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background Authority: Secs. 2 and 38, Public Law 90–629, 90 Stat. 744 (22 U.S.C. 2752, 2778); E.O. 11958, 42 FR 4311, 1977 Comp. p. 79, 22 U.S.C. 2651a. 2. Section 122.3 is amended by revising paragraphs (a) and (b) to read as follows: Need for Correction § 122.3 Registration fees. rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES (a) A person who is required to register may do so for a period of 1 year upon submission of a completed Form DS–2032, transmittal letter and payment of $1,750. (b) Expiration of registration. A registrant must submit its request for registration renewal at least 30 days but no earlier than 60 days prior to the expiration date. * * * * * Dated: July 3, 2008. John C. Rood, Acting Under Secretary for Arms Control and International Security, Department of State. [FR Doc. E8–16537 Filed 7–17–08; 8:45 am] As published, final regulations (TD 9391) contain an error that may prove to be misleading and is in need of clarification. List of Subject in 26 CFR Part 1 Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Correction of Publication Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is corrected by making the following correcting amendment: I PART 1—INCOME TAXES Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read, in part, as follows: I Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * * BILLING CODE 4701–25–P VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:19 Jul 17, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4700 [Removed] Par. 2. Section 1.881–5T is removed. LaNita Van Dyke, Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief Counsel, (Procedure and Administration). [FR Doc. E8–16305 Filed 7–17–08; 8:45 am] 26 CFR Part 1 The final regulations and removal of temporary regulations that are the subjects of this document are under sections 1, 170A, 861, 871, 876, 881, 884, 901, 931, 932, 933, 934, 935, 937, 957, 1402, 6012, 6038, 6046, 6688, and 7701 of the Internal Revenue Code. I § 1.881–5T 41259 Sfmt 4700 BILLING CODE 4830–01–P DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau 27 CFR Parts 7, 16, and 25 [TTB Ruling 2008–3] Classification of Brewed Products as ‘‘Beer’’ Under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and as ‘‘Malt Beverages’’ Under the Federal Alcohol Administration Act Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Treasury. ACTION: Ruling on the classification of brewed products. AGENCY: SUMMARY: This document reproduces a ruling issued by the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau on July 7, 2008, to clarify that that certain brewed products classified as ‘‘beer’’ under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 do not meet the definition of a ‘‘malt beverage’’ under the Federal Alcohol Administration Act. DATES: The ruling was effective on July 7, 2008. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ramona Hupp, Regulations and Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street, NW., Room 200–East, Washington, DC 20220; telephone (202) 927–2166. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 7, 2008, the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) issued TTB Ruling 2008–3 to clarify that certain brewed products classified as ‘‘beer’’ under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 do not meet the definition of a ‘‘malt beverage’’ under the Federal Alcohol Administration Act. We made this ruling available through the TTB Web site on July 8, 2008. This ruling is reproduced below: TTB Ruling 2008–3 Classification of Brewed Products as ‘‘Beer’’ Under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and as ‘‘Malt Beverages’’ Under the Federal Alcohol Administration Act In recent months, the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) E:\FR\FM\18JYR1.SGM 18JYR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 139 (Friday, July 18, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 41258-41259]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-16537]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

22 CFR Part 122

[Public Notice 6300]
RIN 1400-AC50


Amendment to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations: 
Renewal of Registration

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of State is amending the International Traffic 
in Arms Regulations (ITAR) by revising the validity period for 
registration and by limiting the time frame in which a registration may 
be renewed.

DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective on July 18, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia Slygh, Directorate of Defense 
Trade Controls, Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, Department of 
State, (202) 663-2830 or FAX (202) 261-8199; E-mail 
DDTCResponseTeam@state.gov, ATTN: Regulatory Change, ITAR Part 122.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Directorate of Defense Trade Controls 
(DDTC) is revising 22 CFR 122.3 to limit the registration period to one 
year, instead of up to two years for both new registrants and for those 
renewing their registration. Registrants will be required to submit 
renewal packages no more than 60 days prior to their current expiration 
date.

Regulatory Analysis and Notices

    Administrative Procedure Act: This amendment involves a foreign 
affairs function of the United States and, therefore, is not subject to 
the procedures contained in 5 U.S.C. 553 and 554.
    Regulatory Flexibility Act: Because this rule is exempt from notice 
and comment rulemaking under 5 U.S.C. 553, it is exempt from the 
regulatory flexibility analysis requirements set forth in sections 603 
and 604 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 603 and 604).
    Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995: This amendment does not 
involve a mandate that will result in the expenditure by State, local, 
and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of 
$100 million or more in any year and it will not significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed 
necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 
1995.
    Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996: This 
amendment has not been found to be a major rule within the meaning of 
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996.
    Executive Orders 12372 and 13132: This amendment will not have 
substantial effects on the States, on the relationship between the 
national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in

[[Page 41259]]

accordance with Executive Order 13132, it is determined that this 
amendment does not have sufficient federalism implications to require 
consultations or warrant the preparation of a federalism summary impact 
statement. Executive Order 12372, regarding intergovernmental 
consultation on Federal programs and activities, does not apply to this 
amendment.
    Executive Order 12866: This amendment is exempt from the review 
under Executive Order 12866, but has been reviewed internally by the 
Department of State to ensure consistency with the purposes thereof.
    Executive Order 12988: The Department of State has reviewed the 
proposed regulations in light of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive 
Order 12988 to eliminate ambiguity, minimize litigation, establish 
clear legal standards, and reduce burden.
    Paperwork Reduction Act: This rule does not impose any new 
reporting or recordkeeping requirements subject to the Paperwork 
Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35.

List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 122

    Arms and munitions, Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements.

0
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth above, Title 22, Chapter I, 
Subchapter M, Part 122 is amended as follows:

PART 122--REGISTRATION OF MANUFACTURERS AND EXPORTERS

0
1. The authority citation for Part 122 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: Secs. 2 and 38, Public Law 90-629, 90 Stat. 744 (22 
U.S.C. 2752, 2778); E.O. 11958, 42 FR 4311, 1977 Comp. p. 79, 22 
U.S.C. 2651a.


0
2. Section 122.3 is amended by revising paragraphs (a) and (b) to read 
as follows:


Sec.  122.3  Registration fees.

    (a) A person who is required to register may do so for a period of 
1 year upon submission of a completed Form DS-2032, transmittal letter 
and payment of $1,750.
    (b) Expiration of registration. A registrant must submit its 
request for registration renewal at least 30 days but no earlier than 
60 days prior to the expiration date.
* * * * *

    Dated: July 3, 2008.
John C. Rood,
Acting Under Secretary for Arms Control and International Security, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. E8-16537 Filed 7-17-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4701-25-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.