Classification of Brewed Products as “Beer” Under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and as “Malt Beverages” Under the Federal Alcohol Administration Act, 41259-41261 [E8-16413]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 139 / Friday, July 18, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
accordance with Executive Order 13132,
it is determined that this amendment
does not have sufficient federalism
implications to require consultations or
warrant the preparation of a federalism
summary impact statement. Executive
Order 12372, regarding
intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities, does
not apply to this amendment.
Executive Order 12866: This
amendment is exempt from the review
under Executive Order 12866, but has
been reviewed internally by the
Department of State to ensure
consistency with the purposes thereof.
Executive Order 12988: The
Department of State has reviewed the
proposed regulations in light of sections
3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order
12988 to eliminate ambiguity, minimize
litigation, establish clear legal
standards, and reduce burden.
Paperwork Reduction Act: This rule
does not impose any new reporting or
recordkeeping requirements subject to
the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 122
Arms and munitions, Exports,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
I Accordingly, for the reasons set forth
above, Title 22, Chapter I, Subchapter
M, Part 122 is amended as follows:
PART 122—REGISTRATION OF
MANUFACTURERS AND EXPORTERS
1. The authority citation for Part 122
continues to read as follows:
I
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
I
Internal Revenue Service
[TD 9391]
RIN 1545–BF85
Source Rules Involving U.S.
Possessions and Other Conforming
Changes; Correction
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Correcting amendment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document contains a
correction to final regulations (TD 9391)
that were published in the Federal
Register on Wednesday, April 9, 2008
(73 FR 19350) providing rules under
section 937(b) of the Internal Revenue
Code for determining whether income is
derived from sources within a U.S.
possession or territory specified in
section 937(a)(1) (generally referred to
in this preamble as a ‘‘territory’’) and
whether income is effectively connected
with the conduct of a trade or business
within a territory.
DATES: This correction is effective July
18, 2008, and is applicable on April 9,
2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: J.
David Varley, (202) 622–7790 (not a tollfree number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Authority: Secs. 2 and 38, Public Law
90–629, 90 Stat. 744 (22 U.S.C. 2752, 2778);
E.O. 11958, 42 FR 4311, 1977 Comp. p. 79,
22 U.S.C. 2651a.
2. Section 122.3 is amended by
revising paragraphs (a) and (b) to read
as follows:
Need for Correction
§ 122.3
Registration fees.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
(a) A person who is required to
register may do so for a period of 1 year
upon submission of a completed Form
DS–2032, transmittal letter and payment
of $1,750.
(b) Expiration of registration. A
registrant must submit its request for
registration renewal at least 30 days but
no earlier than 60 days prior to the
expiration date.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: July 3, 2008.
John C. Rood,
Acting Under Secretary for Arms Control and
International Security, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E8–16537 Filed 7–17–08; 8:45 am]
As published, final regulations (TD
9391) contain an error that may prove to
be misleading and is in need of
clarification.
List of Subject in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Correction of Publication
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is
corrected by making the following
correcting amendment:
I
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 1 continues to read, in part, as
follows:
I
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
BILLING CODE 4701–25–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:19 Jul 17, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
[Removed]
Par. 2. Section 1.881–5T is removed.
LaNita Van Dyke,
Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch,
Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief
Counsel, (Procedure and Administration).
[FR Doc. E8–16305 Filed 7–17–08; 8:45 am]
26 CFR Part 1
The final regulations and removal of
temporary regulations that are the
subjects of this document are under
sections 1, 170A, 861, 871, 876, 881,
884, 901, 931, 932, 933, 934, 935, 937,
957, 1402, 6012, 6038, 6046, 6688, and
7701 of the Internal Revenue Code.
I
§ 1.881–5T
41259
Sfmt 4700
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau
27 CFR Parts 7, 16, and 25
[TTB Ruling 2008–3]
Classification of Brewed Products as
‘‘Beer’’ Under the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986 and as ‘‘Malt Beverages’’
Under the Federal Alcohol
Administration Act
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Ruling on the classification of
brewed products.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document reproduces a
ruling issued by the Alcohol and
Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau on July
7, 2008, to clarify that that certain
brewed products classified as ‘‘beer’’
under the Internal Revenue Code of
1986 do not meet the definition of a
‘‘malt beverage’’ under the Federal
Alcohol Administration Act.
DATES: The ruling was effective on July
7, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ramona Hupp, Regulations and Rulings
Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street, NW.,
Room 200–East, Washington, DC 20220;
telephone (202) 927–2166.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 7,
2008, the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau (TTB) issued TTB Ruling
2008–3 to clarify that certain brewed
products classified as ‘‘beer’’ under the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 do not
meet the definition of a ‘‘malt beverage’’
under the Federal Alcohol
Administration Act. We made this
ruling available through the TTB Web
site on July 8, 2008. This ruling is
reproduced below:
TTB Ruling 2008–3
Classification of Brewed Products as
‘‘Beer’’ Under the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986 and as ‘‘Malt Beverages’’
Under the Federal Alcohol
Administration Act
In recent months, the Alcohol and
Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB)
E:\FR\FM\18JYR1.SGM
18JYR1
41260
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 139 / Friday, July 18, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
has received inquiries from brewers
regarding the labeling standards that
apply to beers produced from
substitutes for malted barley, such as
rice or corn. We also have fielded
questions from brewers and importers
regarding the appropriate labeling of
beers that are made without hops. This
ruling explains the statutory criteria for
classification of products as ‘‘beer’’ and
‘‘malt beverages’’ under the applicable
laws and regulations.
Laws and Regulations
Federal Alcohol Administration Act
Sections 105(e) and (f) of the Federal
Alcohol Administration Act (FAA Act),
27 U.S.C. 205(e) and (f), vest broad
authority in the Secretary of the
Treasury to prescribe regulations with
respect to the labeling and advertising of
wine, distilled spirits, and malt
beverages that are introduced into
interstate or foreign commerce or
imported into the United States. Section
105(e) also provides that no person may
bottle, or remove from customs custody
in bottles, distilled spirits, wine, or malt
beverages unless he has obtained a
certificate of label approval issued in
accordance with regulations prescribed
by the Secretary. Regulations that
implement the provisions of §§ 105(e)
and (f), as they relate to malt beverages,
are set forth in part 7 of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR part 7), Labeling
and Advertising of Malt Beverages. In
the case of malt beverages, the labeling
provisions of the FAA Act apply only if
the laws of the State into which the malt
beverages are shipped impose similar
requirements.
Section 117(a)(7) of the FAA Act (27
U.S.C. 211(a)(7)) defines the term ‘‘malt
beverage’’ as ‘‘a beverage made by the
alcoholic fermentation of an infusion or
decoction, or combination of both, in
potable brewing water, of malted barley
with hops, or their parts, or their
products, and with or without other
malted cereals, and with or without the
addition of unmalted or prepared
cereals, other carbohydrates or products
prepared therefrom, and with or without
the addition of carbon dioxide, and with
or without other wholesome products
suitable for human food consumption.’’
The same definition appears in the TTB
regulations at 27 CFR 7.10.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Internal Revenue Code of 1986
Chapter 51 of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986 (IRC) sets forth excise tax
collection and related provisions
pertaining to distilled spirits, wines,
and beer; these provisions and the
regulations promulgated thereunder are
also administered by TTB. Within
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:19 Jul 17, 2008
Jkt 214001
Chapter 51 of the IRC, section 5051 (26
U.S.C. 5051) imposes a tax on all beer
brewed or produced, and removed for
consumption or sale, within the United
States, or imported into the United
States. Section 5412 of the IRC (26
U.S.C. 5412) provides that beer may be
removed from the brewery for
consumption or sale only in hogsheads,
packages, and similar containers,
marked, branded, or labeled in such
manner as the Secretary of the Treasury
may by regulation require. Regulations
that implement the Chapter 51
provisions pertaining to beer are set
forth in part 25 of the TTB regulations
(27 CFR part 25) and include, in
§ 25.142 (27 CFR 25.142), label
requirements for beer in bottles.
Section 5052(a) of the IRC (26 U.S.C.
5052(a)) defines the term ‘‘beer,’’ for
purposes of Chapter 51, as ‘‘beer, ale,
porter, stout, and other similar
´
fermented beverages (including sake or
similar products) of any name or
description containing one-half of 1
percent or more of alcohol by volume,
brewed or produced from malt, wholly
or in part, or from any substitute
therefor.’’ The same definition appears
in the TTB regulations at 27 CFR 25.11.
In addition, with reference to what may
be a substitute for malt, § 25.15(a) of the
TTB regulations (27 CFR 25.15(a)) states
that ‘‘[o]nly rice, grain of any kind, bran,
glucose, sugar, and molasses are
substitutes for malt.’’
‘‘Beer’’ versus ‘‘Malt Beverage’’
As indicated above, the definition of
a ‘‘beer’’ under the IRC differs from the
definition of a ‘‘malt beverage’’ under
the FAA Act in several significant
respects. First, the IRC does not require
beer to be fermented from malted barley;
instead, a beer may be brewed or
produced from malt or ‘‘from any
substitute therefor.’’ Second, the IRC
does not require the use of hops in the
production of beer. Third, the definition
of ‘‘beer’’ in the IRC provides that the
product must contain one-half of one
percent or more of alcohol by volume,
whereas there is no minimum alcohol
content for a ‘‘malt beverage’’ under the
FAA Act.
Accordingly, a fermented beverage
that is brewed from a substitute for malt
(such as rice or corn) but without any
malted barley may constitute a ‘‘beer’’
under the IRC but does not fall within
the definition of a ‘‘ malt beverage’’
under the FAA Act. Similarly, a
fermented beverage that is not brewed
with hops may fall within the IRC
definition of ‘‘beer’’ but also falls
outside of the definition of a ‘‘malt
beverage’’ under the FAA Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
´
It should be noted that sake and
similar products are included within the
definition of ‘‘beer’’ under the IRC. See
´
26 U.S.C. 5052(a). However, sake is also
included within the definition of a wine
under the FAA Act, which, among other
things, covers only wines with an
alcohol content of at least seven percent
alcohol by volume. See 27 U.S.C.
´
211(a)(6). Thus, sake and similar
products with an alcohol content of at
least seven percent alcohol by volume
are subject to the labeling and other
requirements of the FAA Act.
TTB Jurisdiction Over These Products
´
Beers (other than sake and similar
products) that do not conform to the
definition of a ‘‘malt beverage’’ in the
FAA Act are outside the scope of the
FAA Act and, therefore, are not subject
to the labeling, advertising, and other
provisions of the TTB regulations
promulgated under the FAA Act. This
means, among other things, that brewers
and importers of such products are not
required to obtain a certificate of label
approval for these beers.
Brewery products that are not malt
beverages under the FAA Act but that
conform to the IRC definition of ‘‘beer’’
are still subject to all applicable
requirements of the IRC and part 25 of
the TTB regulations, including the
labeling of bottles (§ 25.142) and the
approval of formulas (27 CFR 25.55).
Furthermore, all alcohol beverages
containing not less than one-half of one
percent alcohol by volume and intended
for human consumption are subject to
the Government health warning
statement requirements of the Alcoholic
Beverage Labeling Act of 1988 (the
ABLA, codified at 27 U.S.C. 213 through
219 and 219a) and the ABLA
implementing regulations in part 16 of
the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 16).
In cases where a brewery product
´
(other than sake and similar products)
fails to meet the definition of a ‘‘malt
beverage’’ under the FAA Act, the
product will be subject to ingredient
and other labeling requirements
administered by the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration (FDA). As reflected in
the 1987 Memorandum of
Understanding between FDA and TTB’s
predecessor agency, the Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF),
TTB is responsible for the promulgation
and enforcement of regulations with
respect to the labeling of distilled
spirits, wines, and malt beverages
pursuant to the FAA Act. Importantly,
however, in cases where an alcohol
beverage is not covered by the labeling
provisions of the FAA Act, the product
is subject to ingredient and other
labeling requirements under the Federal
E:\FR\FM\18JYR1.SGM
18JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 139 / Friday, July 18, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: July 7, 2008.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
Required Quantities of Malted Barley
and Hops to Qualify as a Malt Beverage
Under the FAA Act
TTB and its predecessor agency have
previously provided guidance on the
minimum quantities of malted barley
and hops required to be used in the
production of malt beverages. In 1994,
the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and
Firearms (ATF) issued ATF Compliance
Matters 94–1, which provided that beers
fermented from at least 25 percent
malted barley (calculated as the
percentage of malt, by weight, compared
to the total dry weight of all ingredients
contributing fermentable extract to the
base product) and made with at least
71⁄2 pounds of hops (or the equivalent
thereof in hop extracts or hop oils) per
100 barrels were ‘‘malt beverages’’
under the FAA Act. Because neither the
FAA Act nor the implementing
regulations in 27 CFR part 7 prescribe
minimum standards for the amount of
malted barley used in the production of
a malt beverage, we are now
reconsidering this guidance.
Pending a decision on whether to
engage in rulemaking on this issue, TTB
will continue to address inquiries from
brewers regarding the classification of
fermented beverages that contain hops
and malted barley, but are made from
less than 25 percent malted barley or
less than 71⁄2 pounds of hops per 100
barrels. For example, we recently
determined that a neutral malt beer base
containing a much lower amount of
malted barley (one percent of the total
dry weight of all ingredients
contributing fermentable extract to the
product) conformed to the definition of
a ‘‘malt beverage.’’
Brewers and importers should contact
the Assistant Director, Advertising,
Labeling and Formulation Division, if
they have a question as to whether a
particular product falls within the
definition of a ‘‘malt beverage’’ and
therefore is subject to the certificate of
label approval and other requirements
under the FAA Act.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, and the
implementing regulations that are
administered by FDA.
Dated: July 14, 2008.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E8–16413 Filed 7–17–08; 8:45 am]
TTB Holding
Held, in order for a brewery product
to fall within the definition of a ‘‘malt
beverage’’ under the FAA Act, it must
be a fermented beverage made from both
malted barley and hops, or their parts,
or their products. A fermented beverage
that qualifies as a ‘‘beer’’ under the IRC
´
(other than sake or similar products) but
that is made without both malted barley
and hops is not subject to the
requirements of the FAA Act.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:19 Jul 17, 2008
Jkt 214001
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
BILLING CODE 4810–31–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[USCG–2008–0220]
RIN 1625–AA00
Regattas and Marine Parades; Great
Lakes Annual Marine Events
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is amending
special local regulations for annual
regattas and marine parades in the
Captain of the Port Detroit zone. This
rule is intended to ensure safety of life
on the navigable waters immediately
prior to, during, and immediately after
regattas or marine parades. This rule
will establish restrictions upon, and
control movement of, vessels in a
specified area immediately prior to,
during, and immediately after regattas
or marine parades.
DATES: This rule is effective July 18,
2008.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, are part
of docket USCG–2008–0220 and are
available online at www.regulations.gov.
This material is also available for
inspection or copying at two locations:
The Docket Management Facility (M–
30), U.S. Department of Transportation,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays and the U.S.
Coast Guard, Sector Detroit, 110 Mt.
Elliot Ave., Detroit, MI 48207 between
8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call
CDR Joseph Snowden, Prevention, U.S.
Coast Guard Sector Detroit at (313) 568–
9580. If you have questions on viewing
the docket, call Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations,
telephone (202) 366–9826.
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Regulatory Information
On April 25, 2008, we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled Regattas and Marine Parades;
Great Lakes Annual Marine Events, in
the Federal Register (73 FR 22303). We
received 0 letters commenting on the
proposed rule. No public meeting was
requested, and none was held.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying this rule would be
contrary to the public interest of
ensuring the safety and security of the
spectators and participants during this
event and immediate action is necessary
to prevent possible loss of life or
property.
Background and Purpose
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
41261
This rule will remove the specific
entries from table 1 found in 33 CFR
100.901, Great Lakes annual marine
events that apply to regattas and marine
parades in the Captain of the Port
Detroit zone and list each regatta or
marine parade as a subpart. This rule
will also add several regattas and
marine parades not previously listed in
33 CFR Part 100 and remove several
events that no longer occur annually or
are not regattas or marine parades.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
No comments were received and no
changes were made to this rule.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
The Coast Guard’s use of these special
local regulations will be periodic in
nature, of short duration, and designed
to minimize the impact on navigable
waters. These special local regulations
will only be enforced immediately
before and during the time the marine
events are occurring. Furthermore, these
special local regulations have been
designed to allow vessels to transit
E:\FR\FM\18JYR1.SGM
18JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 139 (Friday, July 18, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 41259-41261]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-16413]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
27 CFR Parts 7, 16, and 25
[TTB Ruling 2008-3]
Classification of Brewed Products as ``Beer'' Under the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 and as ``Malt Beverages'' Under the Federal
Alcohol Administration Act
AGENCY: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Ruling on the classification of brewed products.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document reproduces a ruling issued by the Alcohol and
Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau on July 7, 2008, to clarify that that
certain brewed products classified as ``beer'' under the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 do not meet the definition of a ``malt beverage''
under the Federal Alcohol Administration Act.
DATES: The ruling was effective on July 7, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ramona Hupp, Regulations and Rulings
Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street, NW.,
Room 200-East, Washington, DC 20220; telephone (202) 927-2166.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 7, 2008, the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax
and Trade Bureau (TTB) issued TTB Ruling 2008-3 to clarify that certain
brewed products classified as ``beer'' under the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986 do not meet the definition of a ``malt beverage'' under the
Federal Alcohol Administration Act. We made this ruling available
through the TTB Web site on July 8, 2008. This ruling is reproduced
below:
TTB Ruling 2008-3
Classification of Brewed Products as ``Beer'' Under the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 and as ``Malt Beverages'' Under the Federal
Alcohol Administration Act
In recent months, the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
(TTB)
[[Page 41260]]
has received inquiries from brewers regarding the labeling standards
that apply to beers produced from substitutes for malted barley, such
as rice or corn. We also have fielded questions from brewers and
importers regarding the appropriate labeling of beers that are made
without hops. This ruling explains the statutory criteria for
classification of products as ``beer'' and ``malt beverages'' under the
applicable laws and regulations.
Laws and Regulations
Federal Alcohol Administration Act
Sections 105(e) and (f) of the Federal Alcohol Administration Act
(FAA Act), 27 U.S.C. 205(e) and (f), vest broad authority in the
Secretary of the Treasury to prescribe regulations with respect to the
labeling and advertising of wine, distilled spirits, and malt beverages
that are introduced into interstate or foreign commerce or imported
into the United States. Section 105(e) also provides that no person may
bottle, or remove from customs custody in bottles, distilled spirits,
wine, or malt beverages unless he has obtained a certificate of label
approval issued in accordance with regulations prescribed by the
Secretary. Regulations that implement the provisions of Sec. Sec.
105(e) and (f), as they relate to malt beverages, are set forth in part
7 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 7), Labeling and Advertising of
Malt Beverages. In the case of malt beverages, the labeling provisions
of the FAA Act apply only if the laws of the State into which the malt
beverages are shipped impose similar requirements.
Section 117(a)(7) of the FAA Act (27 U.S.C. 211(a)(7)) defines the
term ``malt beverage'' as ``a beverage made by the alcoholic
fermentation of an infusion or decoction, or combination of both, in
potable brewing water, of malted barley with hops, or their parts, or
their products, and with or without other malted cereals, and with or
without the addition of unmalted or prepared cereals, other
carbohydrates or products prepared therefrom, and with or without the
addition of carbon dioxide, and with or without other wholesome
products suitable for human food consumption.'' The same definition
appears in the TTB regulations at 27 CFR 7.10.
Internal Revenue Code of 1986
Chapter 51 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (IRC) sets forth
excise tax collection and related provisions pertaining to distilled
spirits, wines, and beer; these provisions and the regulations
promulgated thereunder are also administered by TTB. Within Chapter 51
of the IRC, section 5051 (26 U.S.C. 5051) imposes a tax on all beer
brewed or produced, and removed for consumption or sale, within the
United States, or imported into the United States. Section 5412 of the
IRC (26 U.S.C. 5412) provides that beer may be removed from the brewery
for consumption or sale only in hogsheads, packages, and similar
containers, marked, branded, or labeled in such manner as the Secretary
of the Treasury may by regulation require. Regulations that implement
the Chapter 51 provisions pertaining to beer are set forth in part 25
of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 25) and include, in Sec. 25.142
(27 CFR 25.142), label requirements for beer in bottles.
Section 5052(a) of the IRC (26 U.S.C. 5052(a)) defines the term
``beer,'' for purposes of Chapter 51, as ``beer, ale, porter, stout,
and other similar fermented beverages (including sake or similar
products) of any name or description containing one-half of 1 percent
or more of alcohol by volume, brewed or produced from malt, wholly or
in part, or from any substitute therefor.'' The same definition appears
in the TTB regulations at 27 CFR 25.11. In addition, with reference to
what may be a substitute for malt, Sec. 25.15(a) of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR 25.15(a)) states that ``[o]nly rice, grain of any
kind, bran, glucose, sugar, and molasses are substitutes for malt.''
``Beer'' versus ``Malt Beverage''
As indicated above, the definition of a ``beer'' under the IRC
differs from the definition of a ``malt beverage'' under the FAA Act in
several significant respects. First, the IRC does not require beer to
be fermented from malted barley; instead, a beer may be brewed or
produced from malt or ``from any substitute therefor.'' Second, the IRC
does not require the use of hops in the production of beer. Third, the
definition of ``beer'' in the IRC provides that the product must
contain one-half of one percent or more of alcohol by volume, whereas
there is no minimum alcohol content for a ``malt beverage'' under the
FAA Act.
Accordingly, a fermented beverage that is brewed from a substitute
for malt (such as rice or corn) but without any malted barley may
constitute a ``beer'' under the IRC but does not fall within the
definition of a `` malt beverage'' under the FAA Act. Similarly, a
fermented beverage that is not brewed with hops may fall within the IRC
definition of ``beer'' but also falls outside of the definition of a
``malt beverage'' under the FAA Act.
It should be noted that sake and similar products are included
within the definition of ``beer'' under the IRC. See 26 U.S.C. 5052(a).
However, sake is also included within the definition of a wine under
the FAA Act, which, among other things, covers only wines with an
alcohol content of at least seven percent alcohol by volume. See 27
U.S.C. 211(a)(6). Thus, sake and similar products with an alcohol
content of at least seven percent alcohol by volume are subject to the
labeling and other requirements of the FAA Act.
TTB Jurisdiction Over These Products
Beers (other than sak[eacute] and similar products) that do not
conform to the definition of a ``malt beverage'' in the FAA Act are
outside the scope of the FAA Act and, therefore, are not subject to the
labeling, advertising, and other provisions of the TTB regulations
promulgated under the FAA Act. This means, among other things, that
brewers and importers of such products are not required to obtain a
certificate of label approval for these beers.
Brewery products that are not malt beverages under the FAA Act but
that conform to the IRC definition of ``beer'' are still subject to all
applicable requirements of the IRC and part 25 of the TTB regulations,
including the labeling of bottles (Sec. 25.142) and the approval of
formulas (27 CFR 25.55). Furthermore, all alcohol beverages containing
not less than one-half of one percent alcohol by volume and intended
for human consumption are subject to the Government health warning
statement requirements of the Alcoholic Beverage Labeling Act of 1988
(the ABLA, codified at 27 U.S.C. 213 through 219 and 219a) and the ABLA
implementing regulations in part 16 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part
16).
In cases where a brewery product (other than sak[eacute] and
similar products) fails to meet the definition of a ``malt beverage''
under the FAA Act, the product will be subject to ingredient and other
labeling requirements administered by the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration (FDA). As reflected in the 1987 Memorandum of
Understanding between FDA and TTB's predecessor agency, the Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF), TTB is responsible for the
promulgation and enforcement of regulations with respect to the
labeling of distilled spirits, wines, and malt beverages pursuant to
the FAA Act. Importantly, however, in cases where an alcohol beverage
is not covered by the labeling provisions of the FAA Act, the product
is subject to ingredient and other labeling requirements under the
Federal
[[Page 41261]]
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, and the implementing regulations that are
administered by FDA.
Required Quantities of Malted Barley and Hops to Qualify as a Malt
Beverage Under the FAA Act
TTB and its predecessor agency have previously provided guidance on
the minimum quantities of malted barley and hops required to be used in
the production of malt beverages. In 1994, the Bureau of Alcohol,
Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) issued ATF Compliance Matters 94-1, which
provided that beers fermented from at least 25 percent malted barley
(calculated as the percentage of malt, by weight, compared to the total
dry weight of all ingredients contributing fermentable extract to the
base product) and made with at least 7\1/2\ pounds of hops (or the
equivalent thereof in hop extracts or hop oils) per 100 barrels were
``malt beverages'' under the FAA Act. Because neither the FAA Act nor
the implementing regulations in 27 CFR part 7 prescribe minimum
standards for the amount of malted barley used in the production of a
malt beverage, we are now reconsidering this guidance.
Pending a decision on whether to engage in rulemaking on this
issue, TTB will continue to address inquiries from brewers regarding
the classification of fermented beverages that contain hops and malted
barley, but are made from less than 25 percent malted barley or less
than 7\1/2\ pounds of hops per 100 barrels. For example, we recently
determined that a neutral malt beer base containing a much lower amount
of malted barley (one percent of the total dry weight of all
ingredients contributing fermentable extract to the product) conformed
to the definition of a ``malt beverage.''
Brewers and importers should contact the Assistant Director,
Advertising, Labeling and Formulation Division, if they have a question
as to whether a particular product falls within the definition of a
``malt beverage'' and therefore is subject to the certificate of label
approval and other requirements under the FAA Act.
TTB Holding
Held, in order for a brewery product to fall within the definition
of a ``malt beverage'' under the FAA Act, it must be a fermented
beverage made from both malted barley and hops, or their parts, or
their products. A fermented beverage that qualifies as a ``beer'' under
the IRC (other than sak[eacute] or similar products) but that is made
without both malted barley and hops is not subject to the requirements
of the FAA Act.
Dated: July 7, 2008.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
Dated: July 14, 2008.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E8-16413 Filed 7-17-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P