Airworthiness Directives; Pacific Aerospace Limited Model FU-24 Airplanes, 40951-40953 [E8-16191]
Download as PDF
40951
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 138 / Thursday, July 17, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Component Service Bulletin F8200–035–71–
10, and found to have any deviation greater
than 2.0 mm but less than or equal to 5.0
mm, is acceptable for installation. However,
if a frame is installed in accordance with this
paragraph, it must be NDT-inspected within
3 months after the installation, in accordance
with Part 3 of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Fokker Service Bulletin
SBF50–71–049, dated October 25, 2005.
FAA AD Differences
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/
or service information as follows: No
differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Send information to ATTN: Tom Rodriguez,
Aerospace Engineer, International Branch,
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425)
227–1137; fax (425) 227–1149. Before using
any approved AMOC on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify your
appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the
FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO),
or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act,
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
has approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) Dutch
Airworthiness Directive NL–2005–015, dated
November 30, 2005, and the service bulletins
identified in Table 1 of this AD for related
information.
TABLE 1.—SERVICE INFORMATION
Fokker Service Bulletin
Date
Component Service Bulletin F8200–035–71–10 .....................................................................................................................
Component Service Bulletin F8200–035–71–11 .....................................................................................................................
Service Bulletin SBF50–71–048 ..............................................................................................................................................
Service Bulletin SBF50–71–049 ..............................................................................................................................................
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use the service information
specified in Table 2 of this AD to do the
actions required by this AD, as applicable,
unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
this service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Fokker Services B.V.,
Technical Services Dept., P.O. Box 231, 2150
AE Nieuw-Vennep, the Netherlands.
(3) You may review copies at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
May 30, 2005.
October 25, 2005.
May 30, 2005.
October 25, 2005.
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
(202) 741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
TABLE 2.—MATERIAL INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Service Bulletin
Date
Fokker Component Service Bulletin F8200–035–71–10 .........................................................................................................
Fokker Service Bulletin SBF50–71–048 ..................................................................................................................................
Fokker Service Bulletin SBF50–71–049 ..................................................................................................................................
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 26,
2008.
Dionne Palermo,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–15711 Filed 7–16–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2008–0543 Directorate
Identifier 2007–CE–092–AD; Amendment
39–15607; AD 2008–14–12]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Pacific
Aerospace Limited Model FU–24
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results
from mandatory continuing
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:28 Jul 16, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
May 30, 2005.
May 30, 2005.
October 25, 2005.
airworthiness information (MCAI)
issued by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
To prevent the possible in-flight failure of
the vertical fin, leading to loss of control of
the aircraft * * *
We are issuing this AD to require
actions to correct the unsafe condition
on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
August 21, 2008.
On August 21, 2008, the Director of
the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of certain
publications listed in this AD.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at
Document Management Facility, U.S.
E:\FR\FM\17JYR1.SGM
17JYR1
40952
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 138 / Thursday, July 17, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karl
Schletzbaum, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106;
telephone: (816) 329–4146; fax: (816)
329–4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would
apply to the specified products. That
NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on May 13, 2008 (73 FR 27479).
That NPRM proposed to correct an
unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
To prevent the possible in-flight failure of
the vertical fin, leading to loss of control of
the aircraft * * *
The MCAI requires inspections of the
vertical fin for cracking, corrosion,
scratches, dents, creases, and/or
buckling and the repair of any damaged
area.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
received no comments on the NPRM or
on the determination of the cost to the
public.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD
as proposed.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Differences Between This AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have required different
actions in this AD from those in the
MCAI in order to follow FAA policies.
Any such differences are highlighted in
a NOTE within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we
estimate that this AD will affect 2
products of U.S. registry. We also
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:28 Jul 16, 2008
Jkt 214001
estimate that it will take about 1 workhour per product to comply with basic
requirements of this AD. The average
labor rate is $80 per work-hour.
Based on these figures, we estimate
the cost of this AD to the U.S. operators
to be $160 or $80 per product.
In addition, we estimate that any
necessary follow-on actions would take
about 24 work-hours and require parts
costing $1,000, for a cost of $2,920 per
product. We have no way of
determining the number of products
that may need these actions.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General Requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
(3) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD and placed it in the AD Docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains the NPRM, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(telephone (800) 647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
I
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
I
2008–14–12 Pacific Aerospace Corporation,
Ltd: Amendment 39–15607; Docket No.
FAA–2008–0543; Directorate Identifier
2007–CE–092–AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD)
becomes effective August 21, 2008.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to FU–24 airplanes, all
serial numbers, certificated in any category.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association of America
(ATA) Code 53: Fuselage.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
To prevent the possible in-flight failure of
the vertical fin, leading to loss of control of
the aircraft * * *
The MCAI requires inspections of the vertical
fin for cracking, corrosion, scratches, dents,
creases, and/or buckling and the repair of any
damaged area.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, after August 21,
2008 (the effective date of this AD), do the
following actions following Chapter 05, page
25 of the FU–24–950 Series Maintenance
Manual:
(1) Before the first flight of each day,
visually inspect the vertical stabilizer leading
E:\FR\FM\17JYR1.SGM
17JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 138 / Thursday, July 17, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
edge skin and fin for any cracking, corrosion,
scratches, dents, creases, and/or buckling and
repair as necessary. All non-transparent
protective coatings and their adhesive must
be removed for this inspection.
(2) Within 100 hours time-in-service (TIS)
after August 21, 2008 (the effective date of
this AD), and repetitively thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 100 hours TIS,
perform a detailed inspection of the vertical
stabilizer leading edge skin, leading edge, fin
skin, and the fin forward attachment point
for any cracking, corrosion, scratches, dents,
creases, and/or buckling to include:
(i) Inspection of the entire leading edge
down to the forward attach fitting and
removal of dorsal fin extensions if installed
in order to inspect the obscured areas of the
fin.
(ii) Inspection of the fin skin for corrosion
and cracks, paying particular attention to the
center rib rivet holes and the skin joint at the
fin base.
(iii) Inspection of the fin forward
attachment point for corrosion, removal of
the fin tip, and inspection of the top rib for
cracks at the skin stiffener cutouts.
Manufacturer
40953
(3) If any damage is found during any
inspection required in paragraph (f)(1) or
(f)(2) of this AD, before further flight, obtain
an FAA-approved repair scheme from the
manufacturer and incorporate that repair.
(4) The following transparent polyurethane
protective tapes have been assessed as
suitable for use to re-protect the leading edge
and may remain in situ for subsequent
inspections, provided they are sound and in
a condition to permit visual inspection of the
skin beneath them:
Product
(i) 3M ...............................................
(ii) Scapa .........................................
8591, or 8671, 8672 and 8681HS (aeronautical grade).
Aeroshield P2604 (transparent).
Related Information
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(h) Refer to MCAI Civil Aviation Authority
of New Zealand AD DCA/FU24/176C, dated
September 27, 2007, for related information.
Federal Aviation Administration
FAA AD Differences
Material Incorporated by Reference
Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI
and/or service information as follows:
(1) The inspections required in this AD
must be performed by a person authorized
under 14 CFR part 43 to perform inspections,
as opposed to the MCAI, which allows the
holder of a pilot license to perform the
inspections.
(2) The 50-hour inspection required in the
MCAI goes away because the ‘‘before the first
flight of each day’’ inspection captures the
intent.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Note 1: You may apply for an alternative
method of compliance (AMOC) for an
alternative to the transparent polyurethane
protective tapes listed above.
(i) You must use Chapter 05, page 25 of the
FU–24–950 Series Maintenance Manual,
issued December 1978, to do the actions
required by this AD, unless the AD specifies
otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
this service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Pacific Aerospace Limited,
Hamilton Airport, Private Bag, 3027
Hamilton, New Zealand; telephone: +64 7–
843–6144; facsimile: +64 7–843–6134.
(3) You may review copies at the FAA,
Central Region, Office of the Regional
Counsel, 901 Locust, Room 506, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; or at the National Archives
and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go
to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/
cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, Standards Office,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to
ATTN: Karl Schletzbaum, Aerospace
Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate,
901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone: (816) 329–4146; fax: (816)
329–4090. Before using any approved AMOC
on any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector
(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District
Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:28 Jul 16, 2008
Jkt 214001
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on June
30, 2008.
Kim Smith,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–16191 Filed 7–16–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2007–0267; Directorate
Identifier 2007–NM–245–AD; Amendment
39–15609; AD 2008–14–14]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing
Model 747–400 and 747–400D Series
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Boeing Model 747–400 and 747–400D
series airplanes. This AD requires a
general visual inspection of the power
feeder wire bundle of the auxiliary
power unit (APU) where it crosses the
hydraulic system 4 return tube to
determine if parts are installed to
provide separation between the wire
bundle and hydraulic tube. This AD
also requires related investigative and
corrective actions if necessary. This AD
results from a report that the power
feeder wire bundle of the APU was
found touching the hydraulic system
return tube during inspection of an
airplane. We are issuing this AD to
prevent insufficient clearance between
the wire bundle and hydraulic tube that
could lead to chafing of the wire bundle,
which could cause arcing and a
consequent hydraulic fluid fire in an
area outside of the smoke detection and
fire extinguishing zone; this condition
could result in an uncontrolled fire on
the airplane.
DATES: This AD is effective August 21,
2008.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
E:\FR\FM\17JYR1.SGM
17JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 138 (Thursday, July 17, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 40951-40953]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-16191]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2008-0543 Directorate Identifier 2007-CE-092-AD;
Amendment 39-15607; AD 2008-14-12]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Pacific Aerospace Limited Model FU-24
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
To prevent the possible in-flight failure of the vertical fin,
leading to loss of control of the aircraft * * *
We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective August 21, 2008.
On August 21, 2008, the Director of the Federal Register approved
the incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in this
AD.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at Document Management Facility, U.S.
[[Page 40952]]
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC
20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karl Schletzbaum, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329-4146; fax: (816) 329-4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on May 13, 2008 (73 FR
27479). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:
To prevent the possible in-flight failure of the vertical fin,
leading to loss of control of the aircraft * * *
The MCAI requires inspections of the vertical fin for cracking,
corrosion, scratches, dents, creases, and/or buckling and the repair of
any damaged area.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of
the cost to the public.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we estimate that this AD will
affect 2 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it will take
about 1 work-hour per product to comply with basic requirements of this
AD. The average labor rate is $80 per work-hour.
Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD to the U.S.
operators to be $160 or $80 per product.
In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on actions would
take about 24 work-hours and require parts costing $1,000, for a cost
of $2,920 per product. We have no way of determining the number of
products that may need these actions.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
Requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD Docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2008-14-12 Pacific Aerospace Corporation, Ltd: Amendment 39-15607;
Docket No. FAA-2008-0543; Directorate Identifier 2007-CE-092-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective August
21, 2008.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to FU-24 airplanes, all serial numbers,
certificated in any category.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 53:
Fuselage.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
To prevent the possible in-flight failure of the vertical fin,
leading to loss of control of the aircraft * * *
The MCAI requires inspections of the vertical fin for cracking,
corrosion, scratches, dents, creases, and/or buckling and the repair
of any damaged area.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, after August 21, 2008 (the effective
date of this AD), do the following actions following Chapter 05,
page 25 of the FU-24-950 Series Maintenance Manual:
(1) Before the first flight of each day, visually inspect the
vertical stabilizer leading
[[Page 40953]]
edge skin and fin for any cracking, corrosion, scratches, dents,
creases, and/or buckling and repair as necessary. All non-
transparent protective coatings and their adhesive must be removed
for this inspection.
(2) Within 100 hours time-in-service (TIS) after August 21, 2008
(the effective date of this AD), and repetitively thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 100 hours TIS, perform a detailed inspection
of the vertical stabilizer leading edge skin, leading edge, fin
skin, and the fin forward attachment point for any cracking,
corrosion, scratches, dents, creases, and/or buckling to include:
(i) Inspection of the entire leading edge down to the forward
attach fitting and removal of dorsal fin extensions if installed in
order to inspect the obscured areas of the fin.
(ii) Inspection of the fin skin for corrosion and cracks, paying
particular attention to the center rib rivet holes and the skin
joint at the fin base.
(iii) Inspection of the fin forward attachment point for
corrosion, removal of the fin tip, and inspection of the top rib for
cracks at the skin stiffener cutouts.
(3) If any damage is found during any inspection required in
paragraph (f)(1) or (f)(2) of this AD, before further flight, obtain
an FAA-approved repair scheme from the manufacturer and incorporate
that repair.
(4) The following transparent polyurethane protective tapes have
been assessed as suitable for use to re-protect the leading edge and
may remain in situ for subsequent inspections, provided they are
sound and in a condition to permit visual inspection of the skin
beneath them:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Manufacturer Product
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(i) 3M............................ 8591, or 8671, 8672 and 8681HS
(aeronautical grade).
(ii) Scapa........................ Aeroshield P2604 (transparent).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note 1: You may apply for an alternative method of compliance
(AMOC) for an alternative to the transparent polyurethane protective
tapes listed above.
FAA AD Differences
Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows:
(1) The inspections required in this AD must be performed by a
person authorized under 14 CFR part 43 to perform inspections, as
opposed to the MCAI, which allows the holder of a pilot license to
perform the inspections.
(2) The 50-hour inspection required in the MCAI goes away
because the ``before the first flight of each day'' inspection
captures the intent.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Karl Schletzbaum, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329-4146; fax: (816) 329-4090.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI Civil Aviation Authority of New Zealand AD
DCA/FU24/176C, dated September 27, 2007, for related information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use Chapter 05, page 25 of the FU-24-950 Series
Maintenance Manual, issued December 1978, to do the actions required
by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Pacific Aerospace Limited, Hamilton Airport, Private Bag, 3027
Hamilton, New Zealand; telephone: +64 7-843-6144; facsimile: +64 7-
843-6134.
(3) You may review copies at the FAA, Central Region, Office of
the Regional Counsel, 901 Locust, Room 506, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; or at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-
register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on June 30, 2008.
Kim Smith,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8-16191 Filed 7-16-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P