Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A330-200 and A340-300 Series Airplanes, 40958-40960 [E8-15708]
Download as PDF
40958
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 138 / Thursday, July 17, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 26,
2008.
Dionne Palermo,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–15709 Filed 7–16–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2008–0232; Directorate
Identifier 2007–NM–309–AD; Amendment
39–15612; AD 2008–14–17]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model
A330–200 and A340–300 Series
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results
from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
During fatigue tests (EF3) on the A340–600,
multiple damage were found in the upper
side shell structure at skin and frame (FR) 84
& 85 interface, from stringer 6 to 15 LH/RH.
This damage occurred between 58,341 and
72,891 simulated Flight Cycles (FC).
Due to the higher Design Service Goal and
different design (e.g. skin thickness) for
A330–200 and A340–300 aircraft series, the
damage assessment concluded on [a]
potential impact on these aircraft series.
*
*
*
*
*
The unsafe condition is loss of integrity
of the upper shell structure of the
fuselage. We are issuing this AD to
require actions to correct the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
August 21, 2008.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in this AD
as of August 21, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building, Ground Floor, Room W12–
140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:28 Jul 16, 2008
Jkt 214001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 227–1138; fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would
apply to the specified products. That
NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on March 3, 2008 (73 FR
11364). That NPRM proposed to correct
an unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
During fatigue tests (EF3) on the A340–600,
multiple damage were found in the upper
side shell structure at skin and frame (FR) 84
& 85 interface, from stringer 6 to 15 LH/RH.
This damage occurred between 58,341 and
72,891 simulated Flight Cycles (FC).
Due to the higher Design Service Goal and
different design (e.g. skin thickness) for
A330–200 and A340–300 aircraft series, the
damage assessment concluded on [a]
potential impact on these aircraft series.
In order to allow early detection of cracks
which could avoid possible crack
propagation and consequently to maintain
the structural integrity of the upper side shell
structure between FR84 and FR87, this
Airworthiness Directive (AD) mandates an
inspection program of this area [for cracking]
using a high frequency eddy current (HFEC)
method and a modification to improve the
upper shell structure.
This Revision 1 is issued to clarify that this
AD is not applicable to aircraft A340–300
series on which both AIRBUS modifications
44205 and 45012 have been embodied in
production.
The unsafe condition is loss of integrity
of the upper shell structure of the
fuselage between FR84 and FR87.
Corrective actions include contacting
Airbus and repairing any crack. You
may obtain further information by
examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
considered the comments received.
Request To Remove Reference to
Modification
Air Transport Association (ATA) on
behalf of its member Northwest Airlines
(NWA), requests that we remove the
reference to Airbus Modification (Mod.)
44205 from paragraph (c),
‘‘Applicability,’’ of the NPRM. The
commenters explain that Mod. 44205
defines common structure for Section
19. Mod. 45012, which is in paragraph
(f)(1) of the NPRM, modifies the Section
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
19 upper side shell on A330–200 series
airplanes.
We disagree. Cracks can develop on
this area of Section 19 that affect basic
airplanes fitted with the same features
(i.e., post-Mod. 44205). For Model
A340–300 series airplanes, Mod. 45012
addresses the unsafe condition.
Therefore, only Model A340–300 series
airplanes on which both Mod. 44205
and 45012 have been done in
production are exempt. Analysis further
to these findings established that
cracking would also affect airplanes
post-Mod. 45012 on Model A330–200
series airplanes. The mandated action
separates pre- or post-Mod. 45012, as
specified in paragraphs (f)(1) and (f)(2)
of this AD. We have made no change to
the AD in this regard.
Request To Exclude Certain Airplanes
The same commenters request that we
exclude from paragraph (f)(1) and Table
1 of the NPRM airplanes that have Mod.
52974 or 53223 embodied. The
commenters explain that paragraph (c)
excludes these airplanes, but paragraph
(f)(1) and Table 1 do not exclude them.
Without the exclusion, four more NWA
airplanes are affected by the AD.
We disagree. Paragraph (f)(1), which
includes Table 1, refers to paragraph (c)
where the two modifications are listed
as exclusions. There is no need to
exclude the airplanes again in paragraph
(f)(1) or Table 1 of the AD. We have
made no change to the AD in this
regard.
Request To Move ‘‘Before Further
Flight’’ Requirement
The same commenters request that we
move the requirement to ‘‘Do all
applicable corrective actions before
further flight’’ from paragraph (f)(1) of
the NPRM to the ‘‘Threshold’’ column of
Table 1 of the NPRM. The commenters
explain that moving this statement
would make it clear that corrective
action is required at the time of the
mandated inspection thresholds and not
before.
We disagree. Paragraph (f)(1)(i) of this
AD, which includes Table 1, gives
thresholds for doing the HFEC
inspection. Paragraph (f)(1)(ii) of this
AD also gives a possible threshold for
the HFEC inspection. The requirement
is to do the applicable corrective actions
before further flight. We have made no
change to the AD in this regard.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data,
including the comments received, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD
as proposed.
E:\FR\FM\17JYR1.SGM
17JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 138 / Thursday, July 17, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Differences Between This AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have required different
actions in this AD from those in the
MCAI in order to follow our FAA
policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect
about 7 products of U.S. registry. We
also estimate that it will take about 601
work-hours per product to comply with
the basic requirements of this AD. The
average labor rate is $80 per work-hour.
Required parts will cost about $52,160
per product. Where the service
information lists required parts costs
that are covered under warranty, we
have assumed that there will be no
charge for these costs. As we do not
control warranty coverage for affected
parties, some parties may incur costs
higher than estimated here. Based on
these figures, we estimate the cost of
this AD on the U.S. operators to be
$701,680, or $100,240 per product.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:28 Jul 16, 2008
Jkt 214001
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this AD:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains the NPRM, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone
(800) 647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
I
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
I
2008–14–17 Airbus: Amendment 39–15612.
Docket No. FAA–2008–0232; Directorate
Identifier 2007–NM–309–AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD)
becomes effective August 21, 2008.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A330–
200 and A340–300 series airplanes,
certificated in any category, all certified
models; all serial numbers on which Airbus
Modification 44205 has been embodied in
production, except those on which Airbus
Modification 52974 or 53223 has been
embodied in production. This AD is not
applicable to Model A340–300 series
airplanes on which both Modifications 44205
and 45012 have been embodied in
production.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 53: Fuselage.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
During fatigue tests (EF3) on the A340–600,
multiple damage were found in the upper
side shell structure at skin and frame (FR) 84
& 85 interface, from stringer 6 to 15 LH/RH.
This damage occurred between 58,341 and
72,891 simulated Flight Cycles (FC).
Due to the higher Design Service Goal and
different design (e.g. skin thickness) for
A330–200 and A340–300 aircraft series, the
damage assessment concluded on [a]
potential impact on these aircraft series.
In order to allow early detection of cracks
which could avoid possible crack
propagation and consequently to maintain
the structural integrity of the upper side shell
structure between FR84 and FR87, this
Airworthiness Directive (AD) mandates an
inspection program of this area [for cracking]
using a high frequency eddy current (HFEC)
method and a modification to improve the
upper shell structure.
This Revision 1 is issued to clarify that this
AD is not applicable to aircraft A340–300
series on which both AIRBUS modifications
44205 and 45012 have been embodied in
production.
The unsafe condition is loss of integrity of
the upper shell structure of the fuselage
between FR84 and FR87. Corrective actions
include contacting Airbus and repairing any
crack.
Actions and Compliance
I
§ 39.13
40959
(f) Unless already done, do the following
actions.
(1) For Airbus Model A330–200 series
airplanes, as identified in paragraph (c) of
this AD, on which Modification 45012 has
been embodied in production: At the later of
the compliance times specified in paragraphs
(f)(1)(i) and (f)(1)(ii) of this AD, do the HFEC
inspection for cracking, and corrective
actions as applicable; and modify the upper
shell structure of the fuselage; in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Airbus Service Bulletin A330–53–3152,
dated April 10, 2007. Do all applicable
corrective actions before further flight.
(i) Prior to the compliance time shown in
Table 1 of this AD after the first flight of the
airplane, depending on airplane
configuration.
E:\FR\FM\17JYR1.SGM
17JYR1
40960
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 138 / Thursday, July 17, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1.—COMPLIANCE TIMES FOR MODEL A330 SERIES AIRPLANES WITH MODIFICATION 45012 EMBODIED
Airplane configuration
Threshold
Pre-modification 48827 (WV20 to WV27) ................................................
Post-modification 48827 (WV50 to WV56) ..............................................
25,400 total flight cycles.
17,100 total flight cycles or 94,700 total flight hours, whichever occurs
first.
(ii) Within 90 days after the effective date
of this AD.
(2) For Airbus Model A330–200 and A340–
300 series airplanes as identified in
paragraph (c) of this AD, on which
Modification 45012 has not been embodied
in production: At the later of the compliance
times specified in paragraphs (f)(2)(i) and
(f)(2)(ii) of this AD, modify the upper shell
structure of the fuselage in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Service Bulletin A330–53–3157 or Airbus
Service Bulletin A340–53–4163, both dated
July 5, 2006, as applicable.
(i) Prior to the compliance time shown in
Table 2 of this AD after the first flight of the
airplane.
TABLE 2.—COMPLIANCE TIMES FOR
MODEL A330–200 AND A340–300
SERIES AIRPLANES WITHOUT MODIFICATION 45012 EMBODIED
Airplane
series
A330–200 .....
A340–300 .....
Threshold
6,600 total flight cycles.
14,000 total flight cycles.
(ii) Within 90 days after the effective date
of this AD.
FAA AD Differences
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/
or service information as follows: No
differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
Related Information
(g) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Send information to Attn: Vladimir Ulyanov,
Aerospace Engineer, International Branch,
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425)
227–1138; fax (425) 227–1149. Before using
any approved AMOC on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify your
appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the
FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO),
or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act,
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
has approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
(h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) Airworthiness
Directive 2007–0269R1, dated October 15,
2007; Airbus Service Bulletin A330–53–3152,
dated April 10, 2007; Airbus Service Bulletin
A330–53–3157, dated July 5, 2006; and
Airbus Service Bulletin A340–53–4163,
dated July 5, 2006; for related information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use the applicable service
information specified in Table 3 of this AD
to do the actions required by this AD, unless
the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
this service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Airbus, 1 Rond Point
Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex,
France.
(3) You may review copies at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
(202) 741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
TABLE 3.—MATERIAL INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Service Bulletin
Date
Airbus Service Bulletin A330–53–3152 ...................................................................................................................................
Airbus Service Bulletin A330–53–3157 ...................................................................................................................................
Airbus Service Bulletin A340–53–4163 ...................................................................................................................................
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 27,
2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–15708 Filed 7–16–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
ACTION:
Federal Aviation Administration
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for Agusta
S.p.A. (Agusta) Model A109E and A119
helicopters. This AD results from
mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) issued by an
aviation authority of another country to
identify and correct an unsafe condition
on an aviation product. The European
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), the
Technical Agent for Italy, with which
we have a bilateral agreement, states in
the MCAI: ‘‘Some cases of interference
between the hydraulic pipe, P/N 109–
0761–65–103, and the tail rotor control
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2008–0327; Directorate
Identifier 2007–SW–21–AD; Amendment 39–
15600; AD 2008–14–05]
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Airworthiness Directives; Agusta
S.p.A. Model A109E and A119
Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
AGENCY:
18:28 Jul 16, 2008
Jkt 214001
Final rule.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
RIN 2120–AA64
VerDate Aug<31>2005
April 10, 2007.
July 5, 2006.
July 5, 2006.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\17JYR1.SGM
17JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 138 (Thursday, July 17, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 40958-40960]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-15708]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2008-0232; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-309-AD;
Amendment 39-15612; AD 2008-14-17]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A330-200 and A340-300
Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
During fatigue tests (EF3) on the A340-600, multiple damage were
found in the upper side shell structure at skin and frame (FR) 84 &
85 interface, from stringer 6 to 15 LH/RH. This damage occurred
between 58,341 and 72,891 simulated Flight Cycles (FC).
Due to the higher Design Service Goal and different design (e.g.
skin thickness) for A330-200 and A340-300 aircraft series, the
damage assessment concluded on [a] potential impact on these
aircraft series.
* * * * *
The unsafe condition is loss of integrity of the upper shell structure
of the fuselage. We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct
the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective August 21, 2008.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of August 21,
2008.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building, Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1138; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on March 3, 2008 (73 FR
11364). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:
During fatigue tests (EF3) on the A340-600, multiple damage were
found in the upper side shell structure at skin and frame (FR) 84 &
85 interface, from stringer 6 to 15 LH/RH. This damage occurred
between 58,341 and 72,891 simulated Flight Cycles (FC).
Due to the higher Design Service Goal and different design (e.g.
skin thickness) for A330-200 and A340-300 aircraft series, the
damage assessment concluded on [a] potential impact on these
aircraft series.
In order to allow early detection of cracks which could avoid
possible crack propagation and consequently to maintain the
structural integrity of the upper side shell structure between FR84
and FR87, this Airworthiness Directive (AD) mandates an inspection
program of this area [for cracking] using a high frequency eddy
current (HFEC) method and a modification to improve the upper shell
structure.
This Revision 1 is issued to clarify that this AD is not
applicable to aircraft A340-300 series on which both AIRBUS
modifications 44205 and 45012 have been embodied in production.
The unsafe condition is loss of integrity of the upper shell structure
of the fuselage between FR84 and FR87. Corrective actions include
contacting Airbus and repairing any crack. You may obtain further
information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comments received.
Request To Remove Reference to Modification
Air Transport Association (ATA) on behalf of its member Northwest
Airlines (NWA), requests that we remove the reference to Airbus
Modification (Mod.) 44205 from paragraph (c), ``Applicability,'' of the
NPRM. The commenters explain that Mod. 44205 defines common structure
for Section 19. Mod. 45012, which is in paragraph (f)(1) of the NPRM,
modifies the Section 19 upper side shell on A330-200 series airplanes.
We disagree. Cracks can develop on this area of Section 19 that
affect basic airplanes fitted with the same features (i.e., post-Mod.
44205). For Model A340-300 series airplanes, Mod. 45012 addresses the
unsafe condition. Therefore, only Model A340-300 series airplanes on
which both Mod. 44205 and 45012 have been done in production are
exempt. Analysis further to these findings established that cracking
would also affect airplanes post-Mod. 45012 on Model A330-200 series
airplanes. The mandated action separates pre- or post-Mod. 45012, as
specified in paragraphs (f)(1) and (f)(2) of this AD. We have made no
change to the AD in this regard.
Request To Exclude Certain Airplanes
The same commenters request that we exclude from paragraph (f)(1)
and Table 1 of the NPRM airplanes that have Mod. 52974 or 53223
embodied. The commenters explain that paragraph (c) excludes these
airplanes, but paragraph (f)(1) and Table 1 do not exclude them.
Without the exclusion, four more NWA airplanes are affected by the AD.
We disagree. Paragraph (f)(1), which includes Table 1, refers to
paragraph (c) where the two modifications are listed as exclusions.
There is no need to exclude the airplanes again in paragraph (f)(1) or
Table 1 of the AD. We have made no change to the AD in this regard.
Request To Move ``Before Further Flight'' Requirement
The same commenters request that we move the requirement to ``Do
all applicable corrective actions before further flight'' from
paragraph (f)(1) of the NPRM to the ``Threshold'' column of Table 1 of
the NPRM. The commenters explain that moving this statement would make
it clear that corrective action is required at the time of the mandated
inspection thresholds and not before.
We disagree. Paragraph (f)(1)(i) of this AD, which includes Table
1, gives thresholds for doing the HFEC inspection. Paragraph (f)(1)(ii)
of this AD also gives a possible threshold for the HFEC inspection. The
requirement is to do the applicable corrective actions before further
flight. We have made no change to the AD in this regard.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data, including the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD as proposed.
[[Page 40959]]
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow our FAA policies. Any such differences
are highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect about 7 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it will take about 601 work-hours per
product to comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average
labor rate is $80 per work-hour. Required parts will cost about $52,160
per product. Where the service information lists required parts costs
that are covered under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no
charge for these costs. As we do not control warranty coverage for
affected parties, some parties may incur costs higher than estimated
here. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD on the
U.S. operators to be $701,680, or $100,240 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2008-14-17 Airbus: Amendment 39-15612. Docket No. FAA-2008-0232;
Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-309-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective August
21, 2008.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A330-200 and A340-300 series
airplanes, certificated in any category, all certified models; all
serial numbers on which Airbus Modification 44205 has been embodied
in production, except those on which Airbus Modification 52974 or
53223 has been embodied in production. This AD is not applicable to
Model A340-300 series airplanes on which both Modifications 44205
and 45012 have been embodied in production.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53:
Fuselage.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
During fatigue tests (EF3) on the A340-600, multiple damage were
found in the upper side shell structure at skin and frame (FR) 84 &
85 interface, from stringer 6 to 15 LH/RH. This damage occurred
between 58,341 and 72,891 simulated Flight Cycles (FC).
Due to the higher Design Service Goal and different design (e.g.
skin thickness) for A330-200 and A340-300 aircraft series, the
damage assessment concluded on [a] potential impact on these
aircraft series.
In order to allow early detection of cracks which could avoid
possible crack propagation and consequently to maintain the
structural integrity of the upper side shell structure between FR84
and FR87, this Airworthiness Directive (AD) mandates an inspection
program of this area [for cracking] using a high frequency eddy
current (HFEC) method and a modification to improve the upper shell
structure.
This Revision 1 is issued to clarify that this AD is not
applicable to aircraft A340-300 series on which both AIRBUS
modifications 44205 and 45012 have been embodied in production.
The unsafe condition is loss of integrity of the upper shell
structure of the fuselage between FR84 and FR87. Corrective actions
include contacting Airbus and repairing any crack.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following actions.
(1) For Airbus Model A330-200 series airplanes, as identified in
paragraph (c) of this AD, on which Modification 45012 has been
embodied in production: At the later of the compliance times
specified in paragraphs (f)(1)(i) and (f)(1)(ii) of this AD, do the
HFEC inspection for cracking, and corrective actions as applicable;
and modify the upper shell structure of the fuselage; in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin
A330-53-3152, dated April 10, 2007. Do all applicable corrective
actions before further flight.
(i) Prior to the compliance time shown in Table 1 of this AD
after the first flight of the airplane, depending on airplane
configuration.
[[Page 40960]]
Table 1.--Compliance Times for Model A330 Series Airplanes With
Modification 45012 Embodied
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Airplane configuration Threshold
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pre-modification 48827 (WV20 to WV27).. 25,400 total flight cycles.
Post-modification 48827 (WV50 to WV56). 17,100 total flight cycles or
94,700 total flight hours,
whichever occurs first.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(ii) Within 90 days after the effective date of this AD.
(2) For Airbus Model A330-200 and A340-300 series airplanes as
identified in paragraph (c) of this AD, on which Modification 45012
has not been embodied in production: At the later of the compliance
times specified in paragraphs (f)(2)(i) and (f)(2)(ii) of this AD,
modify the upper shell structure of the fuselage in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A330-53-
3157 or Airbus Service Bulletin A340-53-4163, both dated July 5,
2006, as applicable.
(i) Prior to the compliance time shown in Table 2 of this AD
after the first flight of the airplane.
Table 2.--Compliance Times for Model A330-200 and A340-300 Series
Airplanes Without Modification 45012 Embodied
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Airplane series Threshold
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A330-200......................... 6,600 total flight cycles.
A340-300......................... 14,000 total flight cycles.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(ii) Within 90 days after the effective date of this AD.
FAA AD Differences
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to Attn:
Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-1138; fax (425) 227-1149.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
Airworthiness Directive 2007-0269R1, dated October 15, 2007; Airbus
Service Bulletin A330-53-3152, dated April 10, 2007; Airbus Service
Bulletin A330-53-3157, dated July 5, 2006; and Airbus Service
Bulletin A340-53-4163, dated July 5, 2006; for related information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use the applicable service information specified in
Table 3 of this AD to do the actions required by this AD, unless the
AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France.
(3) You may review copies at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information
on the availability of this material at NARA, call (202) 741-6030,
or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-
locations.html.
Table 3.--Material Incorporated by Reference
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Service Bulletin Date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Airbus Service Bulletin A330-53-3152 April 10, 2007.
Airbus Service Bulletin A330-53-3157 July 5, 2006.
Airbus Service Bulletin A340-53-4163 July 5, 2006.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 27, 2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-15708 Filed 7-16-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P