Kalispell Line Valve 5 to 6 Loop Natural Gas Pipeline Project, Flathead National Forest, Flathead County, MT, 40843-40845 [E8-15828]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 16, 2008 / Notices
identify terms and conditions pursuant
to which CCC will reimburse certain
costs of each project. Agreements will
also outline the responsibilities of the
participant. Interested parties should
review the TASC program regulations
found at 7 CFR part 1487 in addition to
this announcement.
3. Reporting: TASC participants are
required to submit a written report(s),
on no less than an annual basis, and a
final report, each of which evaluates
their TASC project using the
performance measures presented in the
approved proposal.
VII. Agency Contact
For additional information or
assistance, contact the Grants
Management Branch, Foreign
Agricultural Service, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, phone: (202) 720–0866, fax:
(202) 690–0193, e-mail:
emo@fas.usda.gov.
Signed at Washington, DC, on the 2nd of
July, 2008.
Michael W. Yost,
Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service,
and Vice President, Commodity Credit
Corporation.
[FR Doc. E8–16369 Filed 7–15–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–10–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Kalispell Line Valve 5 to 6 Loop Natural
Gas Pipeline Project, Flathead National
Forest, Flathead County, MT
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice: Intent to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement.
AGENCY:
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Forest Service will
prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) for a proposal by
NorthWestern Energy (NWE) to
construct and operate a loop natural gas
pipeline on the Hungry Horse Ranger
District of the Flathead National Forest.
The new loop pipeline would be
installed underground and generally
parallel Highway 2 and an existing
natural gas transmission line currently
authorized to NWE under a Forest
Service special use permit (SUP). NWE
proposes to construct approximately 12
miles of 12-inch diameter steel pipe
from an existing natural gas valve
station near Marias Pass on the
Continental Divide westward to another
existing valve station near the junction
of Bear Creek and the Middle Fork
Flathead River. The SUP would be
amended to include the new loop
pipeline. The project area is
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:44 Jul 15, 2008
Jkt 214001
approximately 25 miles SW of
Browning, Montana and approximately
50 highway miles SE of Columbia Falls,
Montana.
DATES: Substantive comments regarding
the proposal and the scope of the
analysis should be received in writing
on or before July 31, 2008. The draft EIS
(DEIS) is expected to be filed with the
Environmental Protection Agency and
made available for public review in
October 2008. When the DEIS is
available a Notice of Availability (NOA)
will be published in the Federal
Register. The final EIS (FEIS) is
expected to be published in February
2009.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
Jimmy DeHerrera, District Ranger. The
mailing address is Hungry Horse Ranger
District, P.O. Box 190340, Hungry
Horse, Montana 59919. Electronic
comments may be e-mailed to
comments-northern-flathead-hungryhorse-glacier-view@fs.fed.us with
‘‘Kalispell Line Valve 5 to 6 Loop
Natural Gas Pipeline Project’’ in the
subject line and must be submitted in
MS Word (*.doc), rich text format (*.rtf),
or portable document format (*.pdf).
Comments received in response to this
request will be available for public
inspection and will be released in their
entirety if requested, pursuant to the
Freedom of Information Act.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Ondov, Project Manager, Flathead
National Forest, 650 Wolfack Way,
Kalispell, MT 59901, (406) 758–5364.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Action
The purpose and need for this project
is to increase capacity and supply and
to maintain reliable natural gas service
to the Kalispell and Flathead Valley area
of northwestern Montana. The integrity
of the existing 10-inch diameter
pipeline, constructed in 1962, is good,
but NWE projects that its capacity will
be reached within two years due to the
continuing strong population growth in
the Flathead Valley area. The existing
pipeline is the Flathead Valley’s only
source of natural gas. During the past
several years, the demand for natural
gas has increased in western Montana as
a result of steady population and
economic growth. Kalispell, the largest
town to be serviced by the proposed
pipeline, grew from a population of
11,917 in 1990 to 19,432 in 2006.
Proposed Action
The proposed action includes
construction and the long-term
operation and maintenance of
approximately 12 miles of 12-inch
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
40843
diameter steel pipe from an existing
natural gas valve station near Marias
Pass on the Continental Divide
westward to another existing valve
station near the junction of Bear Creek
and the Middle Fork Flathead River.
Approximately 11 miles of the new
pipeline would be on National Forest
System land and one mile would be on
private lands in the central portion of
the project area. The project area lies
within the Hungry Horse Ranger District
of the Flathead National Forest.
The new loop pipeline would be
installed underground and generally
parallel the existing natural gas pipeline
that is currently authorized under a SUP
to NWE. NWE would attempt to build
the new pipeline as close as feasibly and
technically possible to the existing line,
but may have to diverge in some
locations due to terrain, BNSF railroad
tracks, highway right-of-way (ROW),
environmental concerns, other utilities,
engineering needs, or other technical
factors. A portion of the new pipeline
may need to be constructed in an
inventoried roadless area due to a
combination of these factors.
The authorized ROW for the existing
pipeline in this area is 50 feet wide. The
proposed action would require up to an
additional temporary 50-foot wide
working ROW to construct the new
pipeline, with a final 50–80 foot total
long-term operational ROW. The
proposed action would, wherever
possible, utilize the existing cleared,
authorized 50 foot ROW to minimize the
amount of new vegetation clearing and
to combine maintenance access points.
Pipeline operations require that the
ROW remain free of heavy tree cover.
Within the ROW, native forbs and
shrubs would be maintained for the
lifespan of the pipeline. Noxious weeds
would be monitored and abated
throughout the lifespan of the
authorized use. The total new area
affected for the 11 miles of ROW on
National Forest land would be less than
approximately 70 acres.
Underground installation would be
conducted to comply with Department
of Transportation (49 CFR 192.327) and
NWE standards. Pipeline burial depths
would allow for 42 inches of soil cover
in normal soil, 60 inches at stream
crossings, and 48 inches near public
roads and railroads. Bedrock
installations would be covered to a
depth of 30 inches.
Areas of temporary disturbance would
include temporary use areas for
equipment and materials staging and
construction access routes. Some of
these would be on private lands. Native
grasses and herbaceous plants would be
restored in all areas where ground
E:\FR\FM\16JYN1.SGM
16JYN1
40844
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 16, 2008 / Notices
disturbance or vegetation removal
occurs. Revegetation progress would be
monitored for two growing seasons or
until 80% native cover is achieved.
Two shed-sized structures and three
above-ground pipe assemblies would be
constructed at the valve station at the
west end of the proposed project area.
Federal pipeline inspection rules would
require long-term motorized and nonmotorized maintenance access at
selected points along the pipeline route.
Construction of the loop pipeline
would take approximately 90 to 120
days, depending on fire restrictions and
other unforeseen delays. After
construction, NWE would utilize both
the new 12-inch diameter pipeline and
the existing 10-inch diameter pipeline,
with the pipelines interconnecting at
the valve stations to create a ‘‘loop
system.’’ Looping pipelines has been
shown to be a cost-effective method for
increasing system capacity.
A temporary special use construction
permit would be issued to NWE
following completion of the EIS and a
Record of Decision approving the
pipeline. Following construction
planned for summer 2009, the existing
SUP would be amended to include the
new loop pipeline.
More detailed scoping information
and maps can be accessed on the
Flathead National Forest Internet site at
https://www.fs.fed.us/r1/flathead/.
Possible Alternatives
Alternative 1 is the no-action
alternative. Alternative 2, the proposed
action described above, was developed
by NWE to respond to the purpose and
need and may be modified for the draft
EIS upon consideration of field
engineering studies during the summer
of 2008. A route that does not enter
inventoried roadless areas may also be
included in another alternative. Other
viable alternatives may be developed by
modifying the proposed action to
respond to significant issues identified
during the public involvement and
scoping process.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Responsible Official
The Responsible Official is the Forest
Supervisor of the Flathead National
Forest, 650 Wolfpack Way, Kalispell,
Montana 59901. The Forest Supervisor
will make a decision regarding this
proposal considering the comments and
responses, environmental consequences
discussed in the final EIS, and
applicable laws, regulations, and
policies. The decision and rationale for
the decision will be documented in a
Record of Decision (ROD).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:00 Jul 15, 2008
Jkt 214001
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The scope of this project is limited to
decisions concerning activities related
to the construction and operation of a
new natural gas loop pipeline, as
described earlier. The Forest Supervisor
will decide whether to authorize the
construction and long-term operation of
the new loop pipeline with additional
ROW. Related decisions may address
ancillary activities such as weed control
and vegetation monitoring on the
pipeline ROW, access to the pipeline
ROW, etc.
The Forest Supervisor will make
decisions regarding this proposed
project only for National Forest System
lands. Her decision will determine
whether a construction SUP is issued
and the existing permit is amended.
This EIS will tier to the Flathead
National Forest Land and Resource
Management Plan and EIS of January
1986, and its subsequent amendments,
which provide overall guidance for land
management activities on the Flathead
National Forest.
Scoping Process
The Forest Service is seeking input
concerning comments and concerns
about this proposal from Federal, State,
and local agencies, Native American
tribes, and other individuals and
organizations that may be interested in
or affected by the proposed action. This
input will be used to identify issues and
develop alternatives during preparation
of the EIS. Comments should be as
specific as possible to assist the Forest
Service in this manner. In addition to
the ongoing public participation
process, formal opportunities for public
participation will be provided upon
publication of the DEIS.
Preliminary Issues
Preliminary issues and concerns that
will likely be evaluated in the EIS
include potential effects of the proposed
action related to the following:
Threatened or endangered species such
as the grizzly bear, lynx, and bull trout;
inventoried roadless areas; motorized
access; noxious weeds; wetlands; scenic
qualities; and sensitive plant and animal
species.
Permits or Licenses Required
The Forest Supervisor would
authorize NWE to construct, maintain,
and use the new natural gas loop
pipeline through the issuance of a
temporary construction SUP and
amendment of the existing SUP.
NWE may need to obtain additional
permits and approvals to construct the
pipeline. These could include: Section
404 Permit by the U.S. Army Corps of
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Engineers; Section 106 National Historic
Preservation Act Concurrence issued by
the State Historical Preservation Office;
National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System General
Construction Permit issued by
Montana’s Department of
Environmental Quality; Montana Joint
Application for Proposed Work in
Streams, Lakes and Wetlands issued by
the Montana Department of Natural
Resources and Conservation; and a
Utility Crossing Permit issued by the
Montana Department of Transportation.
A complete list of required permits and
authorizations will be included in the
EIS.
Comment Requested
The Forest Service is seeking public
and agency comment on the proposed
action in order to identify major issues
to be analyzed in depth and assistance
in identifying potential alternatives to
be evaluated. Comments received on
this notice, including the names and
addresses of those who comment, will
be considered as part of the public
record on this proposed action and will
be available for public inspection.
Comments submitted anonymously will
be accepted and considered; however,
those who submit anonymous
comments will not have standing to
appeal the subsequent decision under
36 CFR part 215. Additionally, pursuant
to 7 CFR 1.27(d), any person may
request the agency to withhold a
submission from the public record by
showing how the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) permits such
confidentiality. Persons requesting such
confidentiality should be aware that,
under the FOIA, confidentiality may be
granted in only very limited
circumstances, such as to protect trade
secrets. The Forest Service will inform
the requester of the decision regarding
the request for confidentiality. Where
the request is denied, the agency will
return the submission and notify the
requester that the comments may be
resubmitted, without names and
addresses, within a specified number of
days.
The comment period on the DEIS will
be 45 days from the date the
Environmental Protection Agency
publishes the notice of availability in
the Federal Register.
The Forest Service believes, at this
early stage, it is important to give
reviewers notice of several court rulings
related to public participation in the
environmental review process. First,
reviewers of DEIS must structure their
participation in the environmental
review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the
E:\FR\FM\16JYN1.SGM
16JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 16, 2008 / Notices
reviewer’s position and contentions.
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v.
NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). Also,
environmental objections that could be
raised at the DEIS stage but that are not
raised until after completion of the FEIS
may be waived or dismissed by the
courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803
F2.d 1016, 1022 (9th Circ. 1986) and
Wisconsin Heritages, Inc v. Harris, 490
F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980).
Because of these court rulings, it is very
important that those interested in this
proposed action participate by the close
of the 45 day comment period so that
substantive comments and objections
are made available to the Forest Service
at a time when they can meaningfully
consider them and respond to them in
the FEIS.
To assist the Forest Service in
identifying and considering issues and
concerns on the proposed action,
comments on the DEIS should be as
specific as possible. It is also helpful if
comments refer to specific pages or
chapters of the DEIS. Comments may
also address the adequacy of the DEIS
or the merits of the alternatives
formulated and discussed in the
statement. Reviewers may wish to refer
to the Council on Environmental
Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the
National Environmental Policy Act at 40
CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Dated: June 27, 2008.
Cathy Barbouletos,
Forest Supervisor—Flathead National Forest.
[FR Doc. E8–15828 Filed 7–15–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Status of Travel Management Planning
and Providing Access for Subsistence
Purposes Within the USDA Forest
Service, Alaska Region
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice to inform.
AGENCY:
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The USDA Forest Service,
Alaska Region, is notifying the public of
the process for making travel
management decisions on National
Forest System (NFS) lands in Alaska,
consistent with both Subpart B of the
Travel Management Rule (36 CFR 212)
and the Alaska National Interest Lands
Conservation Act (ANILCA) Title VIII,
Sections 810 and 811. The Tongass
National Forest initiated travel
management analyses, and will be
completing National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) and producing Motor
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:00 Jul 15, 2008
Jkt 214001
Vehicle Use Maps (MVUMs) over the
next 18 months, pursuant to 36 CFR 212
Subpart B. The analysis and associated
NEPA will evaluate the effects on
subsistence uses (Section 810 of
ANILCA) and subsistence access
(Section 811 of ANILCA); the public
involvement requirements of ANILCA
810 and 811 will run concurrent with
the NEPA public comment period,
including notice and hearings; the
NEPA documentation (for example,
environmental assessment) and decision
document (for example, Decision Notice
and Finding of No Significant Impact)
will be prepared to document the travel
management route and area designation
decisions. The prohibition on motor
vehicle use off the designated system
(36 CFR 261.13) and the closures or
restrictions to access for subsistence
purposes (Section 811(b) of ANILCA)
will go into effect and are enforceable
when each MVUM is completed,
published, and made available to the
public.
The Chugach National Forest and
Sitka Ranger District, Tongass National
Forest, completed their NEPA process
and associated MVUM’s pursuant 36
CFR 212 Subpart B. The Wrangell
Ranger District, Tongass National
Forest, completed their travel
management NEPA, and is scheduled to
publish their MVUM in 2009. The
prohibition on motor vehicle use off the
designated system (36 CFR 261.13) and
closures or restrictions to access for
subsistence purposes (Section 811(b) of
ANILCA) go into effect and are
enforceable when the MVUMs are
published and made available to the
public.
DATES: The Alaska Region is scheduled
to complete all MVUMs by December
2009.
ADDRESSES: Chugach National Forest,
Supervisor’s Office, 3301 C Street, Suite
300, Anchorage, AK 99503–3993:
Tongass National Forest, Supervisor’s
Office, Federal Building, Ketchikan, AK
99901–6591.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
questions and to obtain information on
the completed MVUM for the Chugach
National Forest, contact Steve Hennig
(907) 743–9509 or visit the Web site at
https://www.fs.fed.us/r10/chugach/
recreation/mvum.html. For questions
and to obtain information on the
schedule for completing travel
management and MVUMs for the
Tongass National Forest, contact Hans
von Rekowsi (907) 747–4217, or visit
the Web site at: https://www.fs.fed.us/
r10/tongass/projects/projects.shtml.
Individuals who use
telecommunication devices for the deaf
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
40845
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern
Standard Time, Monday through Friday.
In
November 2005, the Forest Service
published a rule at 36 CFR 212 (Travel
Management Rule). Subpart B of the
rule addresses designation of roads,
trails, and areas for motor vehicle use.
The rule requires responsible officials
on each administrative unit or ranger
district to designate those roads, trails,
and areas open to motor vehicle use.
Designated routes and areas will be
identified on a MVUM. Once the
MVUM is published, motor vehicle use
that is inconsistent with the
designations will be prohibited. If any
routes are identified for closure, they
will not be closed until after completion
of the NEPA planning process and
publishing of the MVUM. The following
are exempted from designations: Fire,
military, emergency and law
enforcement vehicles for emergency
purposes, limited administrative use by
the Forest Service, and use authorized
under written authorization from the
Forest Service.
Motor vehicle access for subsistence
purposes will be identified through
travel management NEPA analysis being
conducted on each ranger district.
NEPA documents will clearly display
and analyze subsistence uses and
access, and the effects of route and area
designations (and associated closures if
applicable) on these uses and access.
ANILCA 811(a) requires the Forest
Service to ensure rural residents
reasonable access to subsistence
resources on NFS lands. ANILCA 811(b)
requires the Forest Service to permit on
NFS lands in Alaska the appropriate use
for subsistence purposes of
snowmobiles, motorboats, and other
means of surface transportation
traditionally employed for such
purposes by local residents, subject to
reasonable regulation. Decisions about
closures and restrictions will be made
by the responsible official.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: June 30, 2008.
Paul K. Brewster,
Deputy Regional Forester, Alaska Region.
[FR Doc. E8–15873 Filed 7–15–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
E:\FR\FM\16JYN1.SGM
16JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 137 (Wednesday, July 16, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40843-40845]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-15828]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Kalispell Line Valve 5 to 6 Loop Natural Gas Pipeline Project,
Flathead National Forest, Flathead County, MT
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice: Intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Forest Service will prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) for a proposal by NorthWestern Energy (NWE) to
construct and operate a loop natural gas pipeline on the Hungry Horse
Ranger District of the Flathead National Forest. The new loop pipeline
would be installed underground and generally parallel Highway 2 and an
existing natural gas transmission line currently authorized to NWE
under a Forest Service special use permit (SUP). NWE proposes to
construct approximately 12 miles of 12-inch diameter steel pipe from an
existing natural gas valve station near Marias Pass on the Continental
Divide westward to another existing valve station near the junction of
Bear Creek and the Middle Fork Flathead River. The SUP would be amended
to include the new loop pipeline. The project area is approximately 25
miles SW of Browning, Montana and approximately 50 highway miles SE of
Columbia Falls, Montana.
DATES: Substantive comments regarding the proposal and the scope of the
analysis should be received in writing on or before July 31, 2008. The
draft EIS (DEIS) is expected to be filed with the Environmental
Protection Agency and made available for public review in October 2008.
When the DEIS is available a Notice of Availability (NOA) will be
published in the Federal Register. The final EIS (FEIS) is expected to
be published in February 2009.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Jimmy DeHerrera, District Ranger.
The mailing address is Hungry Horse Ranger District, P.O. Box 190340,
Hungry Horse, Montana 59919. Electronic comments may be e-mailed to
comments-northern-flathead-hungry-horse-glacier-view@fs.fed.us with
``Kalispell Line Valve 5 to 6 Loop Natural Gas Pipeline Project'' in
the subject line and must be submitted in MS Word (*.doc), rich text
format (*.rtf), or portable document format (*.pdf). Comments received
in response to this request will be available for public inspection and
will be released in their entirety if requested, pursuant to the
Freedom of Information Act.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Ondov, Project Manager, Flathead
National Forest, 650 Wolfack Way, Kalispell, MT 59901, (406) 758-5364.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Action
The purpose and need for this project is to increase capacity and
supply and to maintain reliable natural gas service to the Kalispell
and Flathead Valley area of northwestern Montana. The integrity of the
existing 10-inch diameter pipeline, constructed in 1962, is good, but
NWE projects that its capacity will be reached within two years due to
the continuing strong population growth in the Flathead Valley area.
The existing pipeline is the Flathead Valley's only source of natural
gas. During the past several years, the demand for natural gas has
increased in western Montana as a result of steady population and
economic growth. Kalispell, the largest town to be serviced by the
proposed pipeline, grew from a population of 11,917 in 1990 to 19,432
in 2006.
Proposed Action
The proposed action includes construction and the long-term
operation and maintenance of approximately 12 miles of 12-inch diameter
steel pipe from an existing natural gas valve station near Marias Pass
on the Continental Divide westward to another existing valve station
near the junction of Bear Creek and the Middle Fork Flathead River.
Approximately 11 miles of the new pipeline would be on National Forest
System land and one mile would be on private lands in the central
portion of the project area. The project area lies within the Hungry
Horse Ranger District of the Flathead National Forest.
The new loop pipeline would be installed underground and generally
parallel the existing natural gas pipeline that is currently authorized
under a SUP to NWE. NWE would attempt to build the new pipeline as
close as feasibly and technically possible to the existing line, but
may have to diverge in some locations due to terrain, BNSF railroad
tracks, highway right-of-way (ROW), environmental concerns, other
utilities, engineering needs, or other technical factors. A portion of
the new pipeline may need to be constructed in an inventoried roadless
area due to a combination of these factors.
The authorized ROW for the existing pipeline in this area is 50
feet wide. The proposed action would require up to an additional
temporary 50-foot wide working ROW to construct the new pipeline, with
a final 50-80 foot total long-term operational ROW. The proposed action
would, wherever possible, utilize the existing cleared, authorized 50
foot ROW to minimize the amount of new vegetation clearing and to
combine maintenance access points. Pipeline operations require that the
ROW remain free of heavy tree cover. Within the ROW, native forbs and
shrubs would be maintained for the lifespan of the pipeline. Noxious
weeds would be monitored and abated throughout the lifespan of the
authorized use. The total new area affected for the 11 miles of ROW on
National Forest land would be less than approximately 70 acres.
Underground installation would be conducted to comply with
Department of Transportation (49 CFR 192.327) and NWE standards.
Pipeline burial depths would allow for 42 inches of soil cover in
normal soil, 60 inches at stream crossings, and 48 inches near public
roads and railroads. Bedrock installations would be covered to a depth
of 30 inches.
Areas of temporary disturbance would include temporary use areas
for equipment and materials staging and construction access routes.
Some of these would be on private lands. Native grasses and herbaceous
plants would be restored in all areas where ground
[[Page 40844]]
disturbance or vegetation removal occurs. Revegetation progress would
be monitored for two growing seasons or until 80% native cover is
achieved.
Two shed-sized structures and three above-ground pipe assemblies
would be constructed at the valve station at the west end of the
proposed project area. Federal pipeline inspection rules would require
long-term motorized and non-motorized maintenance access at selected
points along the pipeline route.
Construction of the loop pipeline would take approximately 90 to
120 days, depending on fire restrictions and other unforeseen delays.
After construction, NWE would utilize both the new 12-inch diameter
pipeline and the existing 10-inch diameter pipeline, with the pipelines
interconnecting at the valve stations to create a ``loop system.''
Looping pipelines has been shown to be a cost-effective method for
increasing system capacity.
A temporary special use construction permit would be issued to NWE
following completion of the EIS and a Record of Decision approving the
pipeline. Following construction planned for summer 2009, the existing
SUP would be amended to include the new loop pipeline.
More detailed scoping information and maps can be accessed on the
Flathead National Forest Internet site at https://www.fs.fed.us/r1/
flathead/.
Possible Alternatives
Alternative 1 is the no-action alternative. Alternative 2, the
proposed action described above, was developed by NWE to respond to the
purpose and need and may be modified for the draft EIS upon
consideration of field engineering studies during the summer of 2008. A
route that does not enter inventoried roadless areas may also be
included in another alternative. Other viable alternatives may be
developed by modifying the proposed action to respond to significant
issues identified during the public involvement and scoping process.
Responsible Official
The Responsible Official is the Forest Supervisor of the Flathead
National Forest, 650 Wolfpack Way, Kalispell, Montana 59901. The Forest
Supervisor will make a decision regarding this proposal considering the
comments and responses, environmental consequences discussed in the
final EIS, and applicable laws, regulations, and policies. The decision
and rationale for the decision will be documented in a Record of
Decision (ROD).
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The scope of this project is limited to decisions concerning
activities related to the construction and operation of a new natural
gas loop pipeline, as described earlier. The Forest Supervisor will
decide whether to authorize the construction and long-term operation of
the new loop pipeline with additional ROW. Related decisions may
address ancillary activities such as weed control and vegetation
monitoring on the pipeline ROW, access to the pipeline ROW, etc.
The Forest Supervisor will make decisions regarding this proposed
project only for National Forest System lands. Her decision will
determine whether a construction SUP is issued and the existing permit
is amended.
This EIS will tier to the Flathead National Forest Land and
Resource Management Plan and EIS of January 1986, and its subsequent
amendments, which provide overall guidance for land management
activities on the Flathead National Forest.
Scoping Process
The Forest Service is seeking input concerning comments and
concerns about this proposal from Federal, State, and local agencies,
Native American tribes, and other individuals and organizations that
may be interested in or affected by the proposed action. This input
will be used to identify issues and develop alternatives during
preparation of the EIS. Comments should be as specific as possible to
assist the Forest Service in this manner. In addition to the ongoing
public participation process, formal opportunities for public
participation will be provided upon publication of the DEIS.
Preliminary Issues
Preliminary issues and concerns that will likely be evaluated in
the EIS include potential effects of the proposed action related to the
following: Threatened or endangered species such as the grizzly bear,
lynx, and bull trout; inventoried roadless areas; motorized access;
noxious weeds; wetlands; scenic qualities; and sensitive plant and
animal species.
Permits or Licenses Required
The Forest Supervisor would authorize NWE to construct, maintain,
and use the new natural gas loop pipeline through the issuance of a
temporary construction SUP and amendment of the existing SUP.
NWE may need to obtain additional permits and approvals to
construct the pipeline. These could include: Section 404 Permit by the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; Section 106 National Historic
Preservation Act Concurrence issued by the State Historical
Preservation Office; National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
General Construction Permit issued by Montana's Department of
Environmental Quality; Montana Joint Application for Proposed Work in
Streams, Lakes and Wetlands issued by the Montana Department of Natural
Resources and Conservation; and a Utility Crossing Permit issued by the
Montana Department of Transportation. A complete list of required
permits and authorizations will be included in the EIS.
Comment Requested
The Forest Service is seeking public and agency comment on the
proposed action in order to identify major issues to be analyzed in
depth and assistance in identifying potential alternatives to be
evaluated. Comments received on this notice, including the names and
addresses of those who comment, will be considered as part of the
public record on this proposed action and will be available for public
inspection. Comments submitted anonymously will be accepted and
considered; however, those who submit anonymous comments will not have
standing to appeal the subsequent decision under 36 CFR part 215.
Additionally, pursuant to 7 CFR 1.27(d), any person may request the
agency to withhold a submission from the public record by showing how
the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) permits such confidentiality.
Persons requesting such confidentiality should be aware that, under the
FOIA, confidentiality may be granted in only very limited
circumstances, such as to protect trade secrets. The Forest Service
will inform the requester of the decision regarding the request for
confidentiality. Where the request is denied, the agency will return
the submission and notify the requester that the comments may be
resubmitted, without names and addresses, within a specified number of
days.
The comment period on the DEIS will be 45 days from the date the
Environmental Protection Agency publishes the notice of availability in
the Federal Register.
The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is important
to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public
participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of
DEIS must structure their participation in the environmental review of
the proposal so that it is meaningful and alerts an agency to the
[[Page 40845]]
reviewer's position and contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp.
v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). Also, environmental objections that
could be raised at the DEIS stage but that are not raised until after
completion of the FEIS may be waived or dismissed by the courts. City
of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F2.d 1016, 1022 (9th Circ. 1986) and Wisconsin
Heritages, Inc v. Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980).
Because of these court rulings, it is very important that those
interested in this proposed action participate by the close of the 45
day comment period so that substantive comments and objections are made
available to the Forest Service at a time when they can meaningfully
consider them and respond to them in the FEIS.
To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues
and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the DEIS should be as
specific as possible. It is also helpful if comments refer to specific
pages or chapters of the DEIS. Comments may also address the adequacy
of the DEIS or the merits of the alternatives formulated and discussed
in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer to the Council on
Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing the procedural
provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at 40 CFR 1503.3 in
addressing these points.
Dated: June 27, 2008.
Cathy Barbouletos,
Forest Supervisor--Flathead National Forest.
[FR Doc. E8-15828 Filed 7-15-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M