General Management Plan, Environmental Impact Statement, Golden Spike National Historic Site, UT, 40614-40615 [E8-16083]

Download as PDF 40614 ACTION: Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 136 / Tuesday, July 15, 2008 / Notices Notice of intent. The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Kingman Field Office, Kingman, Arizona, intends to amend the Kingman Resource Management Plan (RMP) with an associated Environmental Assessment (EA) and by this notice is announcing the start of the public scoping period. The Kingman RMP, approved March 1995, requires amendment in order to designate a Transportation Corridor in response to an Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) proposal to realign State Route 95 (SR–95). DATES: Public scoping comments will be accepted for 30 days from the publication date of this Federal Register Notice. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods: • E-mail: john_reid@blm.gov. • Fax: 928–718–3761. • Mail: Ruben Sanchez, Field Manager, BLM , Kingman Field Office, 2755 Mission Boulevard, Kingman, Arizona 86401. Documents pertinent to this proposal may be examined at the Kingman Field Office. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: For further information and/or to have your name added to our mailing list, contact John Reid, Environmental Protection Specialist, Kingman Field Office, telephone (928) 718–3735; e-mail john_reid@blm.gov. SUMMARY: This document provides notice that the BLM Kingman Field Office, Kingman, Arizona, intends to amend the Kingman RMP with an associated EA and announces the public scoping period. The proposed location for the Transportation Corridor would be within Gila and Salt River Meridian, Mohave County, Arizona: T. 16N., R.20 W.; T. 17 N., R. 20 W.; T. 17 N., R. 21 W.; T. 19 N., R. 21 W.; and, T. 21 N., R. 20 W. The area described contains about 776 acres in Mohave County, Arizona. The amendment will fulfill the needs and obligations set forth by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA), and BLM management policies. The BLM will work collaboratively with interested parties to identify the management decisions that are best suited to local, regional, and national needs and concerns. The purpose of the public scoping process is to determine relevant issues that will influence the scope of the environmental analysis and alternatives. You may submit comments on issues to mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:01 Jul 14, 2008 Jkt 214001 the BLM using one of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES section above. To be most helpful, please submit formal scoping comments within 30 days after publication of this notice. Comments received after conclusion of the 30-day period will be considered, but may not be addressed in the EA. Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. The minutes and list of attendees for each scoping meeting will be available to the public and open for 30 days after the meeting to any participant who wishes to clarify the views he or she expressed. Preliminary issues and management concerns have been identified by BLM personnel, other agencies, and in meetings with individuals and user groups. They represent the BLM’s knowledge to date regarding the existing issues and concerns with current land management. The major issues identified thus far that will be addressed include: • Land Tenure adjustments; • Cultural Resources management; • Visual Resource management; • Special Status Species management; • Wild and Free Roaming Horse and Burro management; and, • Resource Access and Travel Management. In addition to these major issues, a number of management questions and concerns will be addressed in the RMP amendment. The public is encouraged to help identify these questions and concerns during the scoping phase. The Federal Highway Administration is in the process of developing an EIS that will analyze project specific effects. Following the preparation of the EIS there will be further opportunities for public involvement and comment. Authority: 43 CFR 2809. Dated: July 2, 2008. ´ Ruben A. Sanchez, Kingman Field Office Manager. [FR Doc. E8–16082 Filed 7–14–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–32–P PO 00000 Frm 00136 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service General Management Plan, Environmental Impact Statement, Golden Spike National Historic Site, UT National Park Service, Department of the Interior. ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement for the general management plan for Golden Spike National Historic Site. AGENCY: SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C), the National Park Service is preparing an environmental impact statement for the general management plan for Golden Spike National Historic Site, Utah. The Regional Director, Intermountain Region, will approve the environmental impact statement. Golden Spike National Historic Site is in Box Elder County, Utah. The national historic site was authorized by Congress on July 30, 1965. Congress charged the Secretary with acquisition of lands ‘‘ * * * for the purpose of establishing a national historic site commemorating the completion of the first transcontinental railroad across the United States * * *’’ The enabling legislation also states that ‘‘the National Park Service * * * shall administer, protect, and develop such historic site, subject to the provisions of the Act entitled ‘An Act to establish a National Park Service, and for other purposes’ ’’ approved August 25, 1916 (39 Stat. 525), as amended and supplemented, and the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to provide for the preservation of historic American sites buildings, objects, and antiquities of national significance, and for other purposes,’’ approved August 21, 1935 (49 Stat. 666), as amended. The general management plan will prescribe the resource conditions and visitor experiences that are to be achieved and maintained in the national historic site over the next approximately 20 years. The clarification of what must be achieved according to law and policy will be based on review of the park’s purpose, significance, special mandates, and the body of law and policies directing the park management. Management decisions to be made where law, policy, or regulations do not provide clear guidance or limits will be based on the purposes of the park; the range of public expectations and concerns; resource analysis; an evaluation of the natural, cultural, and social impacts of alternative courses of action; and consideration of long-term E:\FR\FM\15JYN1.SGM 15JYN1 mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 136 / Tuesday, July 15, 2008 / Notices economic costs. Based on determinations of desired conditions, the general management plan will outline the kinds of resource management activities, visitor activities, land acquisition, and development that would be appropriate in the park in the future. Alternatives will be developed through this planning process and will include, at a minimum, no-action and the preferred alternative. Major issues may include, but are not limited to, the need to identify desired conditions and future management strategies for cultural and natural resources, the need to address visitor use and experience issues, and site operations concerns. DATES: The National Park Service will conduct public scoping for 90 days from the date of publication of this notice. Open meetings regarding the general management plan may be held during the public scoping period depending on the level of public interest. Specific dates, times, and locations will be made available in the local media, or by contacting the Superintendent, Golden Spike National Historic Site. ADDRESSES: Throughout the scoping and planning process, information will be available for public review and comment online at https:// parkplanning.nps.gov/gosp, and from the office of the Superintendent, Golden Spike National Historic Site, Promontory Summit, Utah. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leslie Crossland, Superintendent, Golden Spike National Historic Site, P.O. Box 897, Brigham City, Utah 84302–0897; TEL (435) 471–2209; FAX (435) 471–2341. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: If you want to comment on the general management planning process for Golden Spike National Historic Site, or on any issues associated with the plan, you many submit your comments by any one of several methods. You may mail comments to Superintendent, Golden Spike National Historic Site, P.O. Box 897, Brigham City, Utah 84302–0897. You may also submit comments on the National Park Service’s Planning, Environment, and Public Comment Web site at https:// parkplanning.nps.gov/gosp. Finally, you may hand-deliver comments to Golden Spike Headquarters near Promontory, Utah. Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. Although you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:01 Jul 14, 2008 Jkt 214001 identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. We will make all submissions from organizations, businesses, or individuals identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations or businesses available for public inspection in their entirety. Dated: May 22, 2008. John T. Crowley, Acting Regional Director, Intermountain Region, National Park Service. [FR Doc. E8–16083 Filed 7–14–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312–DE–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–627] In the Matter of Certain Short Wavelength Semiconductor Lasers and Products Containing Same; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Extending the Target Date of the Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 9) issued by the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) extending the target date in the abovecaptioned investigation to September 14, 2009. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul M. Bartkowski, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–5432. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. PO 00000 Frm 00137 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 40615 This investigation was instituted on January 3, 2008, based on a complaint filed by Seoul Semiconductor Company, Ltd. (‘‘SSC’’) of Seoul, Korea. The complaint, as supplemented, alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of short wavelength semiconductor lasers and products containing the same that infringe claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 5,321,713. The complaint initially named Nichia Corporation (‘‘Nichia’’) of Tokushima, Japan as the sole respondent. Subsequently, five additional respondents were added to the investigation. On May 27, 2008, the administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) issued Order No. 8, requesting that the parties submit a proposed target date and proposed schedules in response to Order No. 6, which added the five additional respondents mentioned above. Upon receipt and consideration of the submissions received, the ALJ issued the subject ID on June 13, 2008, extending the target date from August 24, 2009, to September 14, 2009. No petitions for review were filed. The Commission has determined not to review the ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in sections 210.42 and 210.51 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42, 210.51). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: By order of the Commission: Issued: July 9, 2008. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E8–16023 Filed 7–14–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [USITC SE–08–018] Government in the Sunshine Act Meeting Notice United States International Trade Commission. TIME AND DATE: July 16, 2008 at 11 a.m. PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205–2000. STATUS: Open to the public. MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 1. Agenda for future meetings: None. 2. Minutes. AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: E:\FR\FM\15JYN1.SGM 15JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 136 (Tuesday, July 15, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40614-40615]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-16083]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


General Management Plan, Environmental Impact Statement, Golden 
Spike National Historic Site, UT

AGENCY: National Park Service, Department of the Interior.

ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement 
for the general management plan for Golden Spike National Historic 
Site.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42 
U.S.C. 4332(2)(C), the National Park Service is preparing an 
environmental impact statement for the general management plan for 
Golden Spike National Historic Site, Utah. The Regional Director, 
Intermountain Region, will approve the environmental impact statement.
    Golden Spike National Historic Site is in Box Elder County, Utah. 
The national historic site was authorized by Congress on July 30, 1965. 
Congress charged the Secretary with acquisition of lands `` * * * for 
the purpose of establishing a national historic site commemorating the 
completion of the first transcontinental railroad across the United 
States * * *'' The enabling legislation also states that ``the National 
Park Service * * * shall administer, protect, and develop such historic 
site, subject to the provisions of the Act entitled `An Act to 
establish a National Park Service, and for other purposes' '' approved 
August 25, 1916 (39 Stat. 525), as amended and supplemented, and the 
Act entitled ``An Act to provide for the preservation of historic 
American sites buildings, objects, and antiquities of national 
significance, and for other purposes,'' approved August 21, 1935 (49 
Stat. 666), as amended.
    The general management plan will prescribe the resource conditions 
and visitor experiences that are to be achieved and maintained in the 
national historic site over the next approximately 20 years. The 
clarification of what must be achieved according to law and policy will 
be based on review of the park's purpose, significance, special 
mandates, and the body of law and policies directing the park 
management. Management decisions to be made where law, policy, or 
regulations do not provide clear guidance or limits will be based on 
the purposes of the park; the range of public expectations and 
concerns; resource analysis; an evaluation of the natural, cultural, 
and social impacts of alternative courses of action; and consideration 
of long-term

[[Page 40615]]

economic costs. Based on determinations of desired conditions, the 
general management plan will outline the kinds of resource management 
activities, visitor activities, land acquisition, and development that 
would be appropriate in the park in the future. Alternatives will be 
developed through this planning process and will include, at a minimum, 
no-action and the preferred alternative. Major issues may include, but 
are not limited to, the need to identify desired conditions and future 
management strategies for cultural and natural resources, the need to 
address visitor use and experience issues, and site operations 
concerns.

DATES: The National Park Service will conduct public scoping for 90 
days from the date of publication of this notice. Open meetings 
regarding the general management plan may be held during the public 
scoping period depending on the level of public interest. Specific 
dates, times, and locations will be made available in the local media, 
or by contacting the Superintendent, Golden Spike National Historic 
Site.

ADDRESSES: Throughout the scoping and planning process, information 
will be available for public review and comment online at https://
parkplanning.nps.gov/gosp, and from the office of the Superintendent, 
Golden Spike National Historic Site, Promontory Summit, Utah.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leslie Crossland, Superintendent, 
Golden Spike National Historic Site, P.O. Box 897, Brigham City, Utah 
84302-0897; TEL (435) 471-2209; FAX (435) 471-2341.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: If you want to comment on the general 
management planning process for Golden Spike National Historic Site, or 
on any issues associated with the plan, you many submit your comments 
by any one of several methods. You may mail comments to Superintendent, 
Golden Spike National Historic Site, P.O. Box 897, Brigham City, Utah 
84302-0897. You may also submit comments on the National Park Service's 
Planning, Environment, and Public Comment Web site at https://
parkplanning.nps.gov/gosp. Finally, you may hand-deliver comments to 
Golden Spike Headquarters near Promontory, Utah. Before including your 
address, phone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying 
information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire 
comment--including your personal identifying information--may be made 
publicly available at any time. Although you can ask us in your comment 
to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, 
we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. We will make all 
submissions from organizations, businesses, or individuals identifying 
themselves as representatives or officials of organizations or 
businesses available for public inspection in their entirety.

    Dated: May 22, 2008.
John T. Crowley,
Acting Regional Director, Intermountain Region, National Park Service.
[FR Doc. E8-16083 Filed 7-14-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-DE-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.