Proposed Modification of the Cleveland, OH Class B Airspace Area; Public Meeting, 40446-40447 [E8-16010]
Download as PDF
40446
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 135 / Monday, July 14, 2008 / Notices
and 14 CFR Part 150. These findings are
made in recognition of the description
of federal and non-federal
responsibilities in Senate Report No.
96–52 (1980). On June 23, 2008, the
Airports Division Manager approved the
Burlington International Airport noise
compatibility program. All of the
proposed program elements were
approved.
Effective Date: The effective date
of the FAA’s approval of the Burlington
International Airport noise
compatibility program is June 23, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard Doucette, Federal Aviation
Administration, New England Region,
Airports Division, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington,
Massachusetts 01803, Telephone (781)
238–7613.
Documents reflecting this FAA action
may be obtained from the same
individual.
DATES:
This
notice announces that the FAA has
given its overall approval to the
Burlington International Airport noise
compatibility program, effective June
23, 2008.
Under Section 104(a) of the Aviation
Safety and Noise Abatement Act of 1979
(hereinafter the Act), an airport operator
who has previously submitted a noise
exposure map may submit to the FAA
a noise compatibility program which
sets forth the measures taken or
proposed by the airport operator for the
reduction of existing non-compatible
land uses and prevention of additional
non-compatible land uses within the
area covered by the noise exposure
maps.
The Act requires such programs to be
developed in consultation with
interested and affected parties including
local communities, government
agencies, airport users, and FAA
personnel.
Each airport noise compatibility
program developed in accordance with
Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR), Part
150 is a local program, not a federal
program. The FAA does not substitute
its judgment for that of the airport
proprietor with respect to which
measures should be recommended for
action. The FAA’s approval or
disapproval of FAR Part 150 program
recommendations is measured
according to the standards expressed in
Part 150 and the Act, and is limited to
the following determinations:
(a) The noise compatibility program
was developed in accordance with the
provisions and procedures of FAR Part
150;
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:08 Jul 11, 2008
Jkt 214001
(b) Program measures are reasonably
consistent with achieving the goals of
reducing existing non-compatible land
uses around the airport and preventing
the introduction of additional noncompatible land uses;
(c) Program measures would not
create an undue burden on interstate or
foreign commerce, unjustly discriminate
against types or classes of aeronautical
uses, violate the terms of airport grant
agreements, or intrude into areas
preempted by the federal government;
and
(d) Program measures relating to the
use of flight procedures can be
implemented within the period covered
by the program without derogating
safety, adversely affecting the efficient
use and management of the navigable
airspace and air traffic control systems,
or adversely affecting other powers and
responsibilities of the Administrator as
prescribed by law.
Specific limitations with respect to
FAA’s approval of an airport noise
compatibility program are delineated in
FAR Part 150, Section 150.5. Approval
is not a determination concerning the
acceptability of land uses under Federal,
state, or local law. Approval does not by
itself constitute a FAA implementing
action. A request for Federal action or
approval to implement specific noise
compatibility measures may be
required, and an FAA decision on the
request may require an environmental
assessment of the proposed action.
Approval does not constitute a
commitment by the FAA to financially
assist in the implementation of the
program nor a determination that all
measures covered by the program are
eligible for grant-in-aid funding from the
FAA under the Airport and Airway
Improvement Act of 1982. Where
Federal funding is sought, requests for
project grants must be submitted to the
FAA Regional Office in Burlington,
Massachusetts.
The Burlington International Airport
study contains a proposed noise
compatibility program comprised of
actions designed for implementation by
airport management and adjacent
jurisdictions from the date of study
completion to beyond the year 2011.
The Burlington International Airport,
Burlington VT requested that the FAA
evaluate and approve this material as a
noise compatibility program as
described in Section 104(b) of the Act.
The FAA began its review of the
program on April 23, 2008, and was
required by a provision of the Act to
approve or disapprove the program
within 180 days (other than the use of
new flight procedures for noise control).
Failure to approve or disapprove such a
PO 00000
Frm 00164
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
program within the 180-day period shall
be deemed to be an approval of such a
program.
The submitted program contained 1
proposed action for noise mitigation.
The FAA completed its review and
determined that the procedural and
substantive requirements of the Act and
FAR Part 150 have been satisfied. The
Airports Division Manager therefore
approved the program effective June 23,
2008.
One new administrative program
measure was under consideration and it
was approved. Residences within the
70dB DNL noise contour were eligible
for land acquisition under the prior
Plan, and that eligibility will now be
extended to residences within the 65dB
DNL contour. Various noise abatement
and land use measures from the 1989
Noise Compatibility Plan were restated
in this Record of Approval, so that all
measures now in effect would be
documented in the most recent Record
of Approval.
FAA’s determinations are set forth in
detail in a Record of Approval endorsed
by the Airports Division Manager on
June 23, 2008. The Record of Approval,
as well as other evaluation materials
and the documents comprising the
submittal, are available for review at the
FAA office listed above and at the
administrative offices of Burlington
International Airport, South Burlington
VT.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts on
June 23, 2008.
LaVerne F. Reid,
Manager, Airports Division, FAA New
England Region.
[FR Doc. E8–16038 Filed 7–11–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Proposed Modification of the
Cleveland, OH Class B Airspace Area;
Public Meeting
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice announces two
fact-finding informal airspace meetings
to solicit information from airspace
users and others concerning a proposal
to revise the Class B airspace area at
Cleveland, OH. The purpose of these
meetings is to provide interested parties
an opportunity to present views,
recommendations, and comments on the
proposal. All comments received during
these meetings will be considered prior
E:\FR\FM\14JYN1.SGM
14JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 135 / Monday, July 14, 2008 / Notices
to any revision or issuance of a notice
of proposed rulemaking.
Times and Dates: The informal
airspace meetings will be held on
Tuesday, September 16, 2008, from 2
p.m.–7 p.m., and Wednesday,
September 17, 2008, from 9 a.m.–12
p.m. Comments must be received on or
before September 25, 2008.
ADDRESSES: (1) The meeting on
Tuesday, September 16, 2008, will be
held at the Wellington Town Hall, 115
Willard Memorial Square, 2nd Floor
Council Chambers, Wellington, OH
44090. (2) The meeting on Wednesday,
September 17, 2008, will be held at
Burke Lakefront Airport, Large
Conference Room, 1501 North Marginal
Road, Cleveland, OH 44114.
Comments: Send comments on the
proposal to: Don Smith, Manager,
Operations Support Group, Air Traffic
Organization Central Service Area,
Federal Aviation Administration, 2601
Meacham Boulevard, Fort Worth, Texas
76137, or by fax to (817) 222–5547.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pete
DiFranco, FAA Cleveland ATCT/
TRACON, Cleveland Hopkins
International Airport, 5300 Riverside
Drive, Cleveland, Ohio 44135;
Telephone (216) 898–2020.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Meeting Procedures
(a) The meetings will be informal in
nature and will be conducted by one or
more representatives of the FAA Central
Service Area. A representative from the
FAA will present a formal briefing on
the planned modification to the Class B
airspace at Cleveland, OH. Each
participant will be given an opportunity
to deliver comments or make a
presentation. Only comments
concerning the plan to modify the Class
B airspace area at Cleveland, OH, will
be accepted.
(b) The meetings will be open to all
persons on a space-available basis.
There will be no admission fee or other
charge to attend and participate.
(c) Any person wishing to make a
presentation to the FAA panel will be
asked to sign in and estimate the
amount of time needed for such
presentation. This will permit the panel
to allocate an appropriate amount of
time for each presenter. These meetings
will not be adjourned until everyone on
the list has had an opportunity to
address the panel.
(d) Position papers or other handout
material relating to the substance of
these meetings will be accepted.
Participants wishing to submit handout
material should present an original and
two copies (3 copies total) to the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:08 Jul 11, 2008
Jkt 214001
presiding officer. There should be
additional copies of each handout
available for other attendees.
(e) These meetings will not be
formally recorded.
Agenda for the Meetings
—Sign-in.
—Presentation of Meeting Procedures.
—FAA explanation of the proposed
Class B modifications.
—Solicitation of Public Comments.
—Closing Comments.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
Issued in Washington, DC, on July 2, 2008.
Kenneth McElroy,
Acting Manager, Airspace and Rules Group.
[FR Doc. E8–16010 Filed 7–11–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
Petition for Exemption From the
Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard;
Mazda
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA).
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document grants in full
the petition of Mazda Motor Corporation
(Mazda) in accordance with § 543.9(c)(2)
of 49 CFR part 543, Exemption From the
Theft Prevention Standard, for the
Mazda Tribute vehicle line beginning
with model year (MY) 2010. This
petition is granted because the agency
has determined that the antitheft device
to be placed on the line as standard
equipment is likely to be as effective in
reducing and deterring motor vehicle
theft as compliance with the partsmarking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard.
DATES: The exemption granted by this
notice is effective beginning with model
year (MY) 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Deborah Mazyck, Office of International
Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer
Programs, NHTSA, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Ms. Mazyck’s telephone number is (202)
366–0846. Her fax number is (202) 493–
2990.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a
petition dated March 28, 2008, Mazda
requested an exemption from the partsmarking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard (49 CFR part 541)
PO 00000
Frm 00165
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
40447
for the Mazda Tribute vehicle line
beginning with MY 2010. The petition
requested an exemption from partsmarking pursuant to 49 CFR part 543,
Exemption From Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard, based on the
installation of an antitheft device as
standard equipment for an entire
vehicle line.
Under § 543.5(a), a manufacturer may
petition NHTSA to grant exemptions for
one of its vehicle lines per year. Mazda
has petitioned the agency to grant an
exemption for its Mazda Tribute vehicle
line beginning with MY 2010. In its
petition, Mazda provided a detailed
description and diagram of the identity,
design, and location of the components
of the antitheft device for the Mazda
Tribute vehicle line. Mazda will install
its passive antitheft device as standard
equipment on the vehicle line. Mazda’s
submission is considered a complete
petition as required by 49 CFR 543.7, in
that it meets the general requirements
contained in § 543.5 and the specific
content requirements of § 543.6.
Mazda’s antitheft device is a
transponder-based electronic
immobilizer system. Mazda stated that
the Tribute vehicle line is developed by
the Ford Motor Company (Ford), and
the passive anti-theft electronic engine
immobilizer system proposed for
installation on the line is the same as
Ford’s SecuriLock Passive Anti-Theft
System (PATS). The device will provide
protection against unauthorized use
(i.e., starting and engine fueling), but
will not provide any visible or audible
indication of unauthorized vehicle entry
(i.e., flashing lights or horn alarm).
Mazda stated that the integration of the
transponder into the normal operation
of the ignition key assures activation of
the system. When the ignition key is
turned to the start position, the
transceiver module reads the ignition
key code and transmits an encrypted
message to the cluster. Validation of the
key is determined and start of the
engine is authorized once a separate
encrypted message is sent to the
powertrain’s control module (PCM). The
powertrain will function only if the key
code matches the unique identification
key code previously programmed into
the PCM. If the codes do not match, the
powertrain engine starter will be
disabled.
In its submission, Mazda stated that
the PATS antitheft device was
previously approved for exemption from
the requirements of Part 541. The
agency granted in full the petition for
the Ford Focus vehicle line beginning
with model year 2006, (see 51 FR 7824,
February 14, 2006), the Ford Five
Hundred vehicle line beginning with
E:\FR\FM\14JYN1.SGM
14JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 135 (Monday, July 14, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40446-40447]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-16010]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Proposed Modification of the Cleveland, OH Class B Airspace Area;
Public Meeting
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces two fact-finding informal airspace
meetings to solicit information from airspace users and others
concerning a proposal to revise the Class B airspace area at Cleveland,
OH. The purpose of these meetings is to provide interested parties an
opportunity to present views, recommendations, and comments on the
proposal. All comments received during these meetings will be
considered prior
[[Page 40447]]
to any revision or issuance of a notice of proposed rulemaking.
Times and Dates: The informal airspace meetings will be held on
Tuesday, September 16, 2008, from 2 p.m.-7 p.m., and Wednesday,
September 17, 2008, from 9 a.m.-12 p.m. Comments must be received on or
before September 25, 2008.
ADDRESSES: (1) The meeting on Tuesday, September 16, 2008, will be held
at the Wellington Town Hall, 115 Willard Memorial Square, 2nd Floor
Council Chambers, Wellington, OH 44090. (2) The meeting on Wednesday,
September 17, 2008, will be held at Burke Lakefront Airport, Large
Conference Room, 1501 North Marginal Road, Cleveland, OH 44114.
Comments: Send comments on the proposal to: Don Smith, Manager,
Operations Support Group, Air Traffic Organization Central Service
Area, Federal Aviation Administration, 2601 Meacham Boulevard, Fort
Worth, Texas 76137, or by fax to (817) 222-5547.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pete DiFranco, FAA Cleveland ATCT/
TRACON, Cleveland Hopkins International Airport, 5300 Riverside Drive,
Cleveland, Ohio 44135; Telephone (216) 898-2020.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Meeting Procedures
(a) The meetings will be informal in nature and will be conducted
by one or more representatives of the FAA Central Service Area. A
representative from the FAA will present a formal briefing on the
planned modification to the Class B airspace at Cleveland, OH. Each
participant will be given an opportunity to deliver comments or make a
presentation. Only comments concerning the plan to modify the Class B
airspace area at Cleveland, OH, will be accepted.
(b) The meetings will be open to all persons on a space-available
basis. There will be no admission fee or other charge to attend and
participate.
(c) Any person wishing to make a presentation to the FAA panel will
be asked to sign in and estimate the amount of time needed for such
presentation. This will permit the panel to allocate an appropriate
amount of time for each presenter. These meetings will not be adjourned
until everyone on the list has had an opportunity to address the panel.
(d) Position papers or other handout material relating to the
substance of these meetings will be accepted. Participants wishing to
submit handout material should present an original and two copies (3
copies total) to the presiding officer. There should be additional
copies of each handout available for other attendees.
(e) These meetings will not be formally recorded.
Agenda for the Meetings
--Sign-in.
--Presentation of Meeting Procedures.
--FAA explanation of the proposed Class B modifications.
--Solicitation of Public Comments.
--Closing Comments.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24
FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.
Issued in Washington, DC, on July 2, 2008.
Kenneth McElroy,
Acting Manager, Airspace and Rules Group.
[FR Doc. E8-16010 Filed 7-11-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P