Television Broadcasting Services; South Bend, IN, 40272-40273 [E8-15831]
Download as PDF
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
40272
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 135 / Monday, July 14, 2008 / Proposed Rules
comment cycle provides insufficient
time to assess complex technical issues
to address fully—using empirical data—
the possible interference concerns
raised by allowing TDD transmissions in
the AWS–3 band. T-Mobile asserts that
the Commission must allow additional
time to develop a proper record on this
issue through empirical testing and that
it would be ‘‘arbitrary and capricious’’
to do otherwise. It claims that the
comment period is shorter than what is
typically recognized to allow informed
comment and asserts that the minimum
appropriate comment window is 30
days. While T-Mobile requests at least
an additional 30 days to ‘‘allow
interested parties to conduct their own
testing, submit data, and evaluate the
test results of other parties,’’ it prefers
that the Commission extend the
comment deadline by 90 days and
conduct independent testing on
potential interference issues.
3. AT&T, United States Cellular,
Ericsson and Sony Ericsson, Motorola,
PCIA, and Nokia filed comments in
support of T-Mobile’s request for an
extension of the comment period,
contending that additional time to
provide comments would permit the
inclusion in the record of technical
analyses that will allow the public and
the Commission to better evaluate the
interference issues posed by the
proposed rules.1 The Rural
Telecommunications Group, Inc., and
the National Telecommunications
Cooperative Association (collectively
the ‘‘Rural Advocates’’), aver that
additional time is necessary to allow
small and rural companies adequate
opportunity to assess the impact of the
Commission’s proposal on the
deployment of broadband wireless
services in rural areas. M2Z Networks,
Inc. (M2Z) filed an opposition to TMobile’s request for an extension of the
comment period, asserting that the
Commission already has an extensive
record on interference issues in the
above-captioned proceeding.
4. Under section 1.46(a) of the
Commission’s rules, it is the policy of
the Commission that extensions of time
shall not be routinely granted.2
Nevertheless, in this instance, we find
that providing additional time for filing
comments will serve the public interest
by ensuring the development of a more
complete and well-developed record in
response to the FNPRM. We note that
parties have had notice of the possibility
that TDD operations would be permitted
in the AWS–3 band since at least the
1 In a July 3 ex parte filing, CTIA also expressed
its support for an extension of time.
2 47 CFR 1.46(a).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:45 Jul 11, 2008
Jkt 214001
issuance of the AWS–3 Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking in WT Docket No.
07–195 (AWS–3 NPRM) nearly one year
ago—and nothing proposed in the
FNPRM alters that basic proposal. We
also note that interested parties have
already been in the process of
commenting and engaging in a
meaningful dialogue about these issues
in comments filed in response to the
AWS–3 NPRM. However, we believe
that providing a limited extension
equaling 30 days from Federal Register
publication of the FNPRM 3 to allow for
additional discussion of the proposal in
the FNPRM will not unreasonably delay
the Commission’s adoption of final rules
in this proceeding. Accordingly, we
grant the Request in part by extending
the deadline for all comments to July 25,
2008. In order to provide parties an
additional amount of time in which to
review and respond to the comments
received, we also extend the reply
deadline to 15 days from the revised
comment deadline, to August 11, 2008.4
We also note that, with the issuance of
the FNPRM, adoption of final rules in
this proceeding would not have
occurred in July, 2008.
5. Pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of
the Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i) and 154(j),
and sections 0.131, 0.331, and 1.46 of
the Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 0.131,
0.331, and 1.46, the deadline for filing
comments and reply comments in
response to the FNPRM is extended to
July 25, 2008, and until August 11,
2008, respectively.
6. Pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of
the Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i) and 154(j),
and sections 0.131, 0.331, and 1.46 of
the Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 0.131,
0.331, and 1.46, the T-Mobile Request
for Extension of Time to File Comments
is granted to the extent indicated herein
and otherwise denied.
Federal Communications Commission.
James D. Schlichting,
Acting Chief, Wireless Telecommunications
Bureau.
[FR Doc. E8–16032 Filed 7–11–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
3 The FNPRM was published in the Federal
Register on June 25, 2008. See Service Rules for
Advanced Wireless Services in the 1915–1920 MHz,
1995–2000 MHz, 2155–2175 MHz and 2175–2180
MHz Bands, 73 FR 35995, June 25, 2008.
4 Because 15 days from the revised comment
deadline of July 25 falls on Saturday, August 9,
reply comments are due on Monday, August 11,
2008. We note that nothing in today’s Order
precludes the filing of comments—on some or all
issues—prior to the revised deadline date.
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73
[DA 08–1501; MB Docket No. 08–102; RM–
11439]
Television Broadcasting Services;
South Bend, IN
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Commission requests
comments on a channel substitution
proposed by LeSEA Broadcasting, Inc.
(‘‘LeSEA’’), the licensee of WHME–DT,
DTV channel 48, South Bend, Indiana.
LeSEA requests the substitution of DTV
channel 46 for channel 48 at South
Bend.
Comments must be filed on or
before August 13, 2008, and reply
comments on or before August 28, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Federal Communications
Commission, Office of the Secretary,
445 12th Street, SW., TW–A325,
Washington, DC 20554. In addition to
filing comments with the FCC,
interested parties should serve counsel
for petitioner as follows: Joseph C.
Chautin, III., Esq., Hardy, Carey,
Chautin & Balkin, L.L.P., 1080 West
Causeway Approach, Mandeville, LA
70471–3036.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joyce L. Bernstein,
Joyce.Bernstein@fcc.gov, Media Bureau,
(202) 418–1600.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
synopsis of the Commission’s Notice of
Proposed Rule Making, MB Docket No.
08–102, adopted July 1, 2008, and
released July 2, 2008. The full text of
this document is available for public
inspection and copying during normal
business hours in the FCC’s Reference
Information Center at Portals II, CY–
A257, 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20554. This document
will also be available via ECFS (https://
www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/). (Documents
will be available electronically in ASCII,
Word 97, and/or Adobe Acrobat.) This
document may be purchased from the
Commission’s duplicating contractor,
Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th
Street, SW., Room CY–B402,
Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1–
800–478–3160 or via e-mail https://
www.BCPIWEB.com. To request this
document in accessible formats
(computer diskettes, large print, audio
recording, and Braille), send an e-mail
to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the
Commission’s Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202)
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\14JYP1.SGM
14JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 135 / Monday, July 14, 2008 / Proposed Rules
418–0530 (voice), (202) 418–0432
(TTY). This document does not contain
proposed information collection
requirements subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–
13. In addition, therefore, it does not
contain any proposed information
collection burden ‘‘for small business
concerns with fewer than 25
employees,’’ pursuant to the Small
Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002,
Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(4).
Provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply to
this proceeding. Members of the public
should note that from the time a Notice
of Proposed Rule Making is issued until
the matter is no longer subject to
Commission consideration or court
review, all ex parte contacts are
prohibited in Commission proceedings,
such as this one, which involve channel
allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for
rules governing permissible ex parte
contacts.
For information regarding proper
filing procedures for comments, see 47
CFR 1.415 and 1.420.
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73
Television, Television broadcasting.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Federal Communications
Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR
part 73 as follows:
PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST
SERVICES
1. The authority citation for part 73
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336.
§ 73.202
[Amended]
2. Section 73.622(i), the DTV Table of
Allotments under Indiana, is amended
by substituting channel 46 for channel
48 at South Bend.
Federal Communications Commission.
Clay C. Pendarvis,
Associate Chief, Video Division, Media
Bureau.
[FR Doc. E8–15831 Filed 7–11–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
47 CFR Part 73
[DA 08–1494; MB Docket No. 08–106; RM–
11447]
Television Broadcasting Services;
Castle Rock, CO
Federal Communications
Commission.
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:45 Jul 11, 2008
Jkt 214001
ACTION:
Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: The Commission requests
comments on a channel substitution
proposed by LeSEA Broadcasting of
Denver, Inc. (‘‘LeSEA’’), the licensee of
KWHD–DT, DTV channel 46, Castle
Rock, Colorado. LeSEA requests the
substitution of DTV channel 45 for
channel 46 at Castle Rock.
DATES: Comments must be filed on or
before August 13, 2008, and reply
comments on or before August 28, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Federal Communications
Commission, Office of the Secretary,
445 12th Street, SW., TW–A325,
Washington, DC 20554. In addition to
filing comments with the FCC,
interested parties should serve counsel
for petitioner as follows: Joseph C.
Chautin, III., Esq., Hardy, Carey,
Chautin & Balkin, L.L.P., 1080 West
Causeway Approach, Mandeville, LA
70471–3036.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joyce L. Bernstein,
Joyce.Bernstein@fcc.gov, Media Bureau,
(202) 418–1600.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
synopsis of the Commission’s Notice of
Proposed Rule Making, MB Docket No.
08–30, adopted July 1, 2008, and
released July 2, 2008. The full text of
this document is available for public
inspection and copying during normal
business hours in the FCC’s Reference
Information Center at Portals II, CY–
A257, 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20554. This document
will also be available via ECFS (https://
www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/). (Documents
will be available electronically in ASCII,
Word 97, and/or Adobe Acrobat.) This
document may be purchased from the
Commission’s duplicating contractor,
Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th
Street, SW., Room CY–B402,
Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1–
800–478–3160 or via e-mail https://
www.BCPIWEB.com. To request this
document in accessible formats
(computer diskettes, large print, audio
recording, and Braille), send an e-mail
to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the
Commission’s Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202)
418–0530 (voice), (202) 418–0432
(TTY). This document does not contain
proposed information collection
requirements subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–
13. In addition, therefore, it does not
contain any proposed information
collection burden ‘‘for small business
concerns with fewer than 25
employees,’’ pursuant to the Small
Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002,
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
40273
Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(4).
Provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply to
this proceeding. Members of the public
should note that from the time a Notice
of Proposed Rule Making is issued until
the matter is no longer subject to
Commission consideration or court
review, all ex parte contacts are
prohibited in Commission proceedings,
such as this one, which involve channel
allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for
rules governing permissible ex parte
contacts.
For information regarding proper
filing procedures for comments, see 47
CFR 1.415 and 1.420.
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73
Television, Television broadcasting.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Federal Communications
Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR
part 73 as follows:
PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST
SERVICES
1. The authority citation for part 73
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336.
§ 73.202
[Amended]
2. Section 73.622(i), the DTV Table of
Allotments under Colorado, is amended
by substituting channel 45 for channel
46 at Castle Rock.
Federal Communications Commission.
Clay C. Pendarvis,
Associate Chief, Video Division, Media
Bureau.
[FR Doc. E8–15841 Filed 7–11–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73
[DA 08–1487; MB Docket No. 08–118; RM–
11455]
Television Broadcasting Services;
Shreveport, LA
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Commission requests
comments on a channel substitution
proposed by Louisiana Educational
Television Authority (‘‘LETA’’), the
licensee of noncommercial educational
station KLTS–DT, DTV channel *25,
Shreveport, Louisiana. LETA requests
the substitution of DTV channel *24 for
channel *25 at Shreveport.
E:\FR\FM\14JYP1.SGM
14JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 135 (Monday, July 14, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 40272-40273]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-15831]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73
[DA 08-1501; MB Docket No. 08-102; RM-11439]
Television Broadcasting Services; South Bend, IN
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission requests comments on a channel substitution
proposed by LeSEA Broadcasting, Inc. (``LeSEA''), the licensee of WHME-
DT, DTV channel 48, South Bend, Indiana. LeSEA requests the
substitution of DTV channel 46 for channel 48 at South Bend.
DATES: Comments must be filed on or before August 13, 2008, and reply
comments on or before August 28, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Office of the Secretary,
445 12th Street, SW., TW-A325, Washington, DC 20554. In addition to
filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should serve counsel
for petitioner as follows: Joseph C. Chautin, III., Esq., Hardy, Carey,
Chautin & Balkin, L.L.P., 1080 West Causeway Approach, Mandeville, LA
70471-3036.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joyce L. Bernstein,
Joyce.Bernstein@fcc.gov, Media Bureau, (202) 418-1600.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MB Docket No. 08-102, adopted July 1,
2008, and released July 2, 2008. The full text of this document is
available for public inspection and copying during normal business
hours in the FCC's Reference Information Center at Portals II, CY-A257,
445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554. This document will also be
available via ECFS (https://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/). (Documents will be
available electronically in ASCII, Word 97, and/or Adobe Acrobat.) This
document may be purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor,
Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402,
Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1-800-478-3160 or via e-mail https://
www.BCPIWEB.com. To request this document in accessible formats
(computer diskettes, large print, audio recording, and Braille), send
an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Commission's Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202)
[[Page 40273]]
418-0530 (voice), (202) 418-0432 (TTY). This document does not contain
proposed information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. In addition, therefore, it
does not contain any proposed information collection burden ``for small
business concerns with fewer than 25 employees,'' pursuant to the Small
Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(4).
Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply
to this proceeding. Members of the public should note that from the
time a Notice of Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no
longer subject to Commission consideration or court review, all ex
parte contacts are prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this
one, which involve channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules
governing permissible ex parte contacts.
For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments,
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73
Television, Television broadcasting.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal
Communications Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR part 73 as follows:
PART 73--RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES
1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336.
Sec. 73.202 [Amended]
2. Section 73.622(i), the DTV Table of Allotments under Indiana, is
amended by substituting channel 46 for channel 48 at South Bend.
Federal Communications Commission.
Clay C. Pendarvis,
Associate Chief, Video Division, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. E8-15831 Filed 7-11-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P