Determination Pursuant to Section 686 of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2008, 40007-40008 [E8-15862]
Download as PDF
40007
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 134 / Friday, July 11, 2008 / Notices
Collectively:
Number of Respondents: 3,853,928.
Frequency of Response (Average per
case): 4.
Average Burden per Response: 13
minutes to complete all 4 forms.
Average Burden to Read Internet
Instructions: 3 minutes.
Estimated Annual Burden for Reading
Internet Explanation: 29,312.
Estimated Annual Burden to read
instructions and complete the form:
864,329 hours.
5. Review of the Disability Hearing
Officer’s Reconsidered Determinations
Before It Is Issued—20 CFR 404.913–
404.918, 404.1512–404.1515, 404.1589,
416.912–416.915, 416.989, 416.1413–
416.1418, 404.918(d) and 416.1418(d)—
0960–0709. When SSA approves a
claimant for Social Security Disability
Benefits, it periodically conducts a
Continuing Disability Review (CDR),
during which the Agency reviews the
claimant’s status to see if his/her
condition has improved to the point
where the claimant is capable of
working. If SSA notifies a claimant that
the Agency will cease paying his/her
benefits, he/she may appeal that
determination. The first appeal gives the
claimant the opportunity for a full
evidentiary hearing before a Disability
Hearing Officer (DHO). A federal
component reviews a small sample of
the DHOs’ determinations. It is rare for
the reviewing component to reverse a
DHO determination favorable to the
claimant. Before SSA can effect the
unfavorable determination, the claimant
has 10 days to provide a written
statement explaining why SSA should
not stop his/her payments. That written
statement is the information collected in
this process. In the last three years, we
experienced an average of eight
instances where the reviewing unit
reversed the DHO determination.
Respondents are CDR claimants whose
benefits are going to cease.
Type of Request: Extension of an
OMB-approved information collection.
Number of Respondents: 8.
Frequency of Response: 1.
Average Burden per Response: 60
minutes.
Estimated Annual Burden: 8 hours.
II. SSA has submitted the information
collections listed below. Your
comments on the information
collections will be most useful if OMB
and SSA receive them within 30 days
from the date of this publication. You
can request a copy of the information
collections by e-mail,
OPLM.RCO@ssa.gov, fax 410–965–6400,
or by calling the SSA Reports Clearance
Officer at 410–965–0454.
1. Youth Transition Process
Demonstration Evaluation Data
Collection—0960–0687
Background
The purpose of the Youth Transition
Demonstration (YTD) project is to help
young people with disabilities make the
transition from school to work. While
participating in the project, youth can
continue to work and/or continue their
education because SSA waives certain
disability program rules and offers
services to youth who are receiving
disability benefits or have a high
probability of receiving them. SSA will
fully implement YTD projects in 10 sites
across the country. The evaluation will
produce empirical evidence on the
effects of the waivers and project
services including educational
attainment, employment, earnings, and
receipt of benefits by youth with
disabilities but also on the Social
Security Trust Fund and federal income
tax revenues. This type of project is
authorized by Sections 1110 and 234 of
the Social Security Act.
Project Description
Given the importance of estimating
YTD effects as accurately as possible,
we will evaluate the project using
rigorous analytic methods based on
randomly assigning youth to a treatment
or control group. We will conduct
several data collections. These include
(1) Baseline interviews with youth and
their parents or guardians prior to
random assignment; (2) follow-up
interviews at 12 and 36 months after
random assignment; (3) interviews
and/or roundtable discussions with
local program administrators, program
supervisors, and service delivery staff;
and (4) focus groups of youths, their
parents, and service providers. The
respondents are youths with disabilities
enrolled in the project; their parents or
guardians; program staff; and service
providers.
Type of Request: Revision of an
existing OMB clearance.
Average
burden per
response
(hours)
Responses
per
respondent
Number of
respondents
Total response
burden
(hours)
Data collection year
Collection
2008 ..............................
Baseline ..............................................................
Informed consent ................................................
12 month follow-up .............................................
In-depth interviews .............................................
Focus group ........................................................
Program staff/service provider ...........................
2,531
2,531
1,502
120
60
32
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.55
0.083
0.83
0.42
1.5
1
1,392
210
1,247
50
90
32
Total 2008 .............
.............................................................................
........................
........................
..........................
3,021
Dated: July 7, 2008.
Elizabeth A. Davidson,
Reports Clearance Officer, Social Security
Administration.
[FR Doc. E8–15752 Filed 7–10–08; 8:45 am]
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 4191–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 6286]
Determination Pursuant to Section 686
of the Department of State, Foreign
Operations, and Related Programs
Appropriations Act, 2008
Pursuant to the authority vested in me
by the laws of the United States,
including Section 686(b) of the
Department of State, Foreign
Operations, and Related Programs
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:02 Jul 10, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Appropriations Act, 2008 (Div. J, Pub. L.
110–161) (the ‘‘Act’’), I hereby
determine that waiving the
requirements of subsection (a) of
Section 686 of the Act is important to
the national interests of the United
States, and I hereby so waive.
This Determination shall be published
in the Federal Register and copies shall
be provided to the appropriate
committees of the Congress.
E:\FR\FM\11JYN1.SGM
11JYN1
40008
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 134 / Friday, July 11, 2008 / Notices
Dated: June 25, 2008.
Condoleezza Rice,
Secretary of State, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E8–15862 Filed 7–10–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–23–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice: 6284]
Exchange Visitor Program—
Termination of Flight Training
Programs
ACTION:
Statement of Policy.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stanley S. Colvin, Deputy Assistant
Secretary, Office of Private Sector
Exchange, Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs, U.S. Department of
State, SA–44, 301 4th St., SW., Room
734, Washington, DC 20547. E-mail:
jexchanges@state.gov; FAX: 202–203–
5087.
SUMMARY: Since 1949 the Department of
State (Department) has designated
private sector and governmental entities
to conduct training programs for eligible
foreign nationals. For the past twenty
years, such programs have included
flight training activities. Currently, eight
organizations facilitate the entry into the
United States of approximately 350
foreign nationals annually for the
purpose of flight training under the
aegis of the Exchange Visitor Program
and its J-visa. Regulations dealing
specifically with flight training
programs appear at 22 CFR 62.22(o).
These eight Department of State
designated flight schools are also
certified by the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS) to issue the
Form I–20, which is needed to obtain an
M visa. Regulations governing the M
visa appear at 8 CFR 214.2(m). DHS is
also responsible for the security-related
screening of all alien flight training
candidates. Regulations governing flight
training candidate screening appear at
49 CFR 1552. In January 2006, the
Department issued a Statement of Policy
on J–1 Flight Training Programs (71 FR
3913, January 24, 2006) providing notice
that it would henceforth not designate
any new J visa flight training program
sponsors; nor would it allow currentlydesignated flight training programs to
expand their programs, pending a
determination as to which Federal
agency ultimately would assume sole
responsibility for administering and
monitoring these programs.
In April 2006, the Department
published proposed modifications to its
regulations governing the Exchange
Visitor Program’s trainee category,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:19 Jul 10, 2008
Jkt 214001
including flight training. In response to
this proposed rule and by letter dated
May 30, 2006, the Office of Advocacy of
the Small Business Administration
opined, that if adopted, the
Department’s proposed modifications to
22 CFR 62.22(o), could have significant
impact on a substantial number of small
entities, in particular, flight training
schools that sponsor alien flight
candidates entering the United States on
the J visa. Given this comment, the
Department did not modify then
existing flight training regulations when
it adopted its Interim Final rule (72 FR
33669, June 19, 2007).
In December 2007, the Department
published a Final Rule (72 FR 72245,
December 20, 2007) that permits the
termination of designated programs that
the Department determines no longer
further its public diplomacy mission or
compromises the national security of
the United States (22 CFR 62.62). In
adopting this provision, the Department
explained that the Exchange Visitor
Program is the cornerstone of the
Department’s public diplomacy efforts
and integral to the furtherance of the
President’s Constitutional prerogatives
in conducting foreign affairs (72 FR
62112). Pursuant to this regulatory
authority, the Department hereby
determines that all flight training
programs no longer further the public
diplomacy mission of the Department,
and accordingly, effective June 1, 2010,
the Department will terminate the
Exchange Visitor Program sponsor
designations of all eight sponsors of
flight training programs.
The Department’s decision to
eliminate flight training from the
Exchange Visitor Program is based on
thorough consideration and
deliberation. As explained in its January
2006 Statement of Policy, the
Department does not have the expertise
and resources to monitor fully flight
training programs and ensure their
compliance with the national security
concerns that underlie the Patriot Act
(Pub. L. 107–56). Further, the Aviation
and Transportation Security Act of 2001
(49 U.S.C. 44939), assigns to the
Attorney General discretion to request a
wide variety of information from alien
flight candidates in order to determine
whether such flight candidates present
a threat to aviation or national security.
In light of this statutory directive, DHS
issued an Interim Final Rule on
September 20, 2004, assigning full
responsibility for the screening of alien
flight training candidates to DHS.
Finally, all Department designated flight
training sponsors are certified by the
Department of Homeland Security to
issue the Form I–20 and thereby permit
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
foreign nationals to participate in flight
training programs under the M visa. As
all eight existing Department of State
designated sponsors may continue,
without interruption, the administration
of flight training programs for foreign
nationals, the Department believes that
concerns raised by the Office of
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration are outweighed by the
security interests of the Government.
The Department’s position is sound
given the expertise of DHS to administer
and monitor such programs, efficiencies
of government operation, and the
security issues inherent in flight
training.
The flight training sponsors will
continue to have obligations to their
exchange visitors pursuant to 22 CFR
62.63: they must fulfill their
responsibilities to all exchange visitors
who are in the United States at the time
of their program termination until the
individual’s exchange program is
completed. Also, sponsors must notify
prospective exchange visitors who have
not yet entered the United States that
the program has been terminated. Such
sponsors will have access to SEVIS to
manage their existing program
participants, but will not be able to
initiate new programs after December
31, 2009.
Dated: June 30, 2008.
Stanley S. Colvin,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of Private
Sector Exchange, Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E8–15454 Filed 7–10–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
[Docket Number: OST–95–179 and OST–95–
623]
Notice of Request for Extension of a
Previously Approved Collection
Office of the Secretary.
Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13, this notice
announces the Department of
Transportation’s (DOT) intention to
request extension of a previously
approved information collection.
DATES: Comments on this notice must be
received on or before September 9,
2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit a comment
(identified by DOT Docket Numbers
E:\FR\FM\11JYN1.SGM
11JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 134 (Friday, July 11, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40007-40008]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-15862]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 6286]
Determination Pursuant to Section 686 of the Department of State,
Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2008
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the laws of the United
States, including Section 686(b) of the Department of State, Foreign
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2008 (Div. J, Pub.
L. 110-161) (the ``Act''), I hereby determine that waiving the
requirements of subsection (a) of Section 686 of the Act is important
to the national interests of the United States, and I hereby so waive.
This Determination shall be published in the Federal Register and
copies shall be provided to the appropriate committees of the Congress.
[[Page 40008]]
Dated: June 25, 2008.
Condoleezza Rice,
Secretary of State, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E8-15862 Filed 7-10-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-23-P