Voluntary Third-Party Certification Programs for Imported Aquacultured Shrimp; Notice of Pilot Program, 39705-39708 [E8-15713]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 133 / Thursday, July 10, 2008 / Notices
FDA in determining its infrastructure
needs, as well as the process for
evaluating third-party certification
programs. The criteria for selection for
that pilot are based upon the attributes
set forth in the draft guidance.
As with the pilot, the 12 attributes
discussed in the draft guidance are
intended to provide a model that could
be tailored for particular categories of
products and incorporated by FDA as it
recognizes third-party certification
programs for those products. These
attributes incorporate such things as the
authority of the certification body to
adequately inspect the establishments
seeking certification, qualifications, and
training for the third-party inspectors,
self-assessment of the certification
programs and its inspectors, elements of
an effective inspection program,
notification to FDA, and preventing
conflicts of interest. While FDA invites
comments on all aspects of the draft
guidance, FDA is particularly interested
in receiving comments on this list of
attributes for the certification program.
More specifically, we would like to
know whether there are some attributes
that should be removed or added and
whether the draft guidance provides
sufficient information about each
attribute. We are also interested in
knowing how this list compares with
existing, well-accepted guidelines or
requirements for certification programs.
The draft guidance is being issued
consistent with FDA’s good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115).
The draft guidance, when finalized, will
represent FDA’s current thinking on
Voluntary Third-Party Certification
Programs for Foods and Feeds. It does
not create or confer any rights for or on
any person and does not operate to bind
FDA or the public. An alternative
approach may be used if such approach
satisfies the requirements of the
applicable statutes and regulations.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
II. Comments
The draft guidance is being
distributed for comment purposes only
and is not intended for implementation
at this time. Interested persons may
submit to the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) written or
electronic comments regarding the draft
guidance. Submit a single copy of
electronic comments or two paper
copies of any mailed comments, except
that individuals may submit one paper
copy. Comments are to be identified
with the docket number found in the
brackets in the heading of this
document. A copy of the draft guidance
and received comments are available for
public examination in the Division of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:58 Jul 09, 2008
Jkt 214001
Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Please note that on January 15, 2008,
the FDA Division of Dockets
Management Web site transitioned to
the Federal Dockets Management
System (FDMS). FDMS is a
Government-wide, electronic docket
management system. Electronic
comments or submissions will be
accepted by FDA only through FDMS at
https://www.regulations.gov.
III. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet
may obtain the draft guidance at either
https://www.fda.gov/oc/guidance/
thirdpartycert.html or https://
www.regulations.gov.
Dated: July 7, 2008.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and
Planning.
[FR Doc. E8–15715 Filed 7–9–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2008–N–0382]
Voluntary Third-Party Certification
Programs for Imported Aquacultured
Shrimp; Notice of Pilot Program
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is seeking thirdparty certification bodies that certify
foreign processors of aquacultured
shrimp for compliance with FDA’s
Seafood Hazard Analysis and Critical
Control Point (HACCP) regulations to
volunteer to participate in a pilot
program to be conducted by FDA’s
Center for Food Safety and Applied
Nutrition (CFSAN) and Office of
Regulatory Affairs (ORA). The goal of
the pilot program is to gather technical
and operational information that will
assist FDA in determining its
infrastructure needs, as well as the
process for evaluating third-party
certification programs, in order to assist
FDA in moving towards broader
recognition of voluntary third-party
certification programs, including thirdparty certification programs for
aquacultured shrimp, at a later time.
DATES: Submit written and electronic
requests to participate in the pilot
program by August 25, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Submit written requests to
participate in the pilot program to the
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
39705
Center for Food Safety and Applied
Nutrition (HFS–325), Food and Drug
Administration, 5100 Paint Branch
Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740. Submit
electronic requests to participate to
aquaculture@fda.hhs.gov. We strongly
encourage interested persons to
electronically submit their request to
participate.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brett Koonse, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition (HFS–325), Food
and Drug Administration, 5100 Paint
Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740,
301–436–1700.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Ensuring the safety of food for human
and animal use is a shared
responsibility between the public and
private sectors. FDA has the authority to
establish regulatory standards, inspect
facilities, and take action if there are
violations, but it is primarily the
responsibility of industry to ensure that
foods products intended for human and
animal consumption in the United
States are safe and meet applicable FDA
standards. An increasing number of
establishments that sell foods to the
public, such as retailers and food
service providers, are independently
requesting, as a condition of doing
business, that their suppliers, both
foreign and domestic, become certified
as meeting safety (as well as quality)
standards. In addition, domestic and
foreign suppliers (such as producers, comanufacturers, or re-packers) are
increasingly looking to third-party
certification programs to assist them in
meeting U.S. requirements.
On July 18, 2007, the President issued
Executive Order 13439 to establish the
Interagency Working Group on Import
Safety (Working Group). On November
6, 2007, the Working Group released an
‘‘Action Plan for Import Safety: A
Roadmap for Continual Improvement’’
(Action Plan) (https://
www.importsafety.gov/report/
actionplan.pdf). The Action Plan
contains 14 broad recommendations and
50 specific short- and long-term action
steps to better protect consumers and
enhance the safety of the increasing
volume of imports entering the United
States. The Action Plan stresses the
importance of the private sector’s
responsibility for the safety of its
products and the importance of ongoing
private-sector mechanisms and
experience as a basis for ongoing,
substantive public-private collaboration.
The public and private sectors have a
shared interest in import safety, and
substantive improvement will require
E:\FR\FM\10JYN1.SGM
10JYN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
39706
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 133 / Thursday, July 10, 2008 / Notices
the careful collaboration of the entire
importing community.
Recommendation 2 of the Action Plan
is to ‘‘verify compliance of foreign
producers with United States safety and
security standards through
certification.’’ Third-party certification
can augment the Federal Government’s
and the importing community’s ability
to help ensure that products imported
into the United States meet U.S. safety
and security standards. The Action Plan
states ‘‘[f]or foreign producers, the
ability to participate in voluntary
certification programs could allow
products from firms that comply with
U.S. safety and security standards to
enter the United States more quickly.
This would facilitate trade, while
allowing federal departments and
agencies to focus their resources on
products from non-certified firms or for
which information suggests there may
be safety or security concerns. This
would allow federal departments and
agencies to more effectively target their
resources.’’
Action Steps 2.2 and 2.4 of the Action
Plan call for the recognition or
development of voluntary third-party
certification programs, based on risk, for
foreign producers of certain products
who export to the United States and the
creation of incentives for foreign firms
to participate in voluntary certification
programs and for importers to purchase
only from certified firms.
In conjunction with the Action Plan,
on November 6, 2007, FDA released its
Food Protection Plan (FPP), a
comprehensive strategy designed to
bolster efforts to better protect the
Nation’s food supply (https://
www.fda.gov/oc/initiatives/advance/
food/plan.html). The FPP is a three-part
plan that uses science and a risk-based
approach of prevention, intervention
and response to ensure the safety of
domestic as well as imported foods
eaten by American consumers. The FPP
emphasizes certification as a way to
help verify the safety of products from
a growing food establishment inventory,
both foreign and domestic.
On April 2, 2008, FDA published a
notice in the Federal Register (73 FR
17989) requesting comments by May 19,
2008, on the use of third-party
certification programs for foods and
animal feeds. The notice was FDA’s first
step in soliciting public input in the
design and development or recognition
of voluntary third-party certification
programs.
In order to assist FDA in moving
towards broader recognition of thirdparty certification programs, FDA is
now seeking voluntary participants for a
third-party certification pilot program
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:58 Jul 09, 2008
Jkt 214001
for aquacultured shrimp. This pilot
program is the next step in gathering
technical and operational information
that will assist FDA in determining its
infrastructure needs. The information
from this pilot also will assist with
subsequent steps, such as developing
the process for evaluating third-party
certification programs should FDA
decide to recognize voluntary thirdparty certification programs and to
consider certification in its decision
making. Certification might be
considered, for example, in decision
making regarding determination of
establishment inspection priorities,
entry admissibly, field exam and
sampling priorities, ‘‘may proceed’’
rates, and requests by firms to have their
products removed from an import alert.
If FDA were to recognize third-party
certification programs, we would do so
on a product-by-product basis. We
would also provide an opportunity for
both foreign and domestic certification
bodies to voluntarily seek FDA
recognition and for foreign and
domestic establishments to voluntarily
seek certification.
II. Voluntary Third-Party Certification
Pilot Program
A. Scope and Selection Attributes
FDA is seeking a limited number of
third-party certification bodies (such as
private, non-government entities, other
Federal government, State government,
and foreign government agencies) that
currently certify foreign processors of
aquacultured shrimp for compliance
with FDA’s Seafood HACCP regulations
to volunteer to participate in the pilot
program. Participants in the pilot
program will be asked to provide FDA
with technical feedback on the pilot.
A limited number of voluntary
participants are needed for the pilot
program. The agency will use its
discretion in choosing participants for
Phase II of the pilot (see following
discussion) from those who apply
during Phase I of the pilot based on the
following attributes:
1. Authority of the Certification Body.
The certification body should have the
authority to perform inspection
activities, collect and evaluate records,
collect and analyze samples, and assess
and report on compliance as necessary
to ensure certification standards and
requirements are met and maintained.
2. Qualification and Training for
Inspectors. The certification body
should ensure that its inspectors are
adequately trained to perform their
work assignments. Such training
includes course work, field work, and
continuing education.
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3. Elements of an Effective Inspection
Program. The certification body should
ensure that its inspectors are
consistently using established, widelyrecognized standards when performing
inspections. The inspector should
prioritize and target the elements of
producing, manufacturing, processing,
packing, and holding that pose the
greatest risk to human and/or animal
health. The certification body should
have written policies and procedures
describing the protocol to be used by all
inspectors during an inspection. During
an inspection, inspectors should verify
that the establishments and products
meet and maintain certification criteria
that include the following:
• The processor is in compliance
with applicable FDA regulatory
requirements for food, including FDA’s
Seafood HACCP regulations;
• If appropriate, the processor has in
place, and effectively executes,
management systems that ensure the
safety of all shrimp products, from
production to distribution, as
applicable, including the feed used, the
hatchery, the growing area, harvesting,
processing, and transportation. This
may include a preventive control
program for farms (e.g., Good
Aquaculture Practices, Best
Management Practices, farmer training
along with farm inspections), a
verification program (e.g., an effective
testing scheme to ensure products are
free of unapproved drugs, chemicals,
and pathogens), a traceability program,
or recall and follow-up procedures in
case of an outbreak or illness associated
with a product.
4. Inspection Audit Program. The
third-party certification body should
conduct audits of its inspections to
assess the effectiveness of the
inspections and sample collections and
to ensure the competency and
consistency of its inspectors.
5. Cooperation with FDA and Other
Appropriate Government Officials
When Safety Problems Occur. The
certification body should cooperate as
necessary with FDA and other
appropriate government authorities if
the certification body discovers a
situation in which there is a reasonable
probability that U.S. consumers may
consume or be exposed to a food
product that could cause serious
adverse health consequences or death to
humans or animals, whether the
contamination or problem was caused
intentionally or unintentionally. Such
cooperation may include notification to
relevant agencies inside and outside of
the United States, where the food is sold
or distributed. Moreover, when FDA has
reliable information from the Centers for
E:\FR\FM\10JYN1.SGM
10JYN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 133 / Thursday, July 10, 2008 / Notices
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) or
other reliable sources about a health risk
associated with an FDA-regulated food
product and FDA is conducting a
traceback of a product, FDA may request
information from the certification body
regarding the supply chain. Such
information may be requested based on
preliminary information that an
establishment under the certification
program may be implicated. The
certification body should provide FDA
with this information in a timely
manner. Such information would be
disclosed (or protected from disclosure)
in accordance with applicable laws and
policies.
6. Compliance and Corrective Action.
The certification body should have
strategies, procedures, and actions to
ensure the establishments and products
it certifies comply with FDA laws and
regulations and otherwise meet
certification standards, to take action
when there is non-compliance, and to
evaluate the effectiveness of corrective
action programs.
7. Industry Relations. At a minimum,
the certification body should provide
establishments seeking certification
with information about current FDA
requirements and guidances.
8. Resources. The certification body
should have sufficient resources, such
as technological tools and
infrastructure, to carry out its
certification program.
9. Self-Assessment of Overall
Certification Program. In addition to
auditing the inspection program, the
certification body should assess the
effectiveness of the certification
program as a whole.
10. Laboratories. The certification
body should have access to laboratory
services to support the program
functions. The laboratories should be
accredited by an accreditation body
operating in accordance with
International Organization for
Standardization (ISO) standard 120/IEC
17011, General requirements for
Accreditation bodies accrediting
conformity assessment bodies.
11. Notifications to FDA. The
certification body should promptly
notify FDA of problems or changes that
can affect product safety or security. We
expect prompt notification of the
following:
a. Safety Issues. The certification body
should immediately notify FDA if an
inspector finds or discovers a situation
in which there is a reasonable
probability that U.S. consumers may
consume or be exposed to a food that
could cause serious adverse health
consequences or death to humans or
animals. This information may pertain
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:58 Jul 09, 2008
Jkt 214001
to intentional or unintentional
contamination. The certification body
should provide detailed information
that describes the extent and nature of
the problem and allows us to identify
the product and source, including
traceability records.
b. Fraud. The certification body
should promptly notify FDA if it has
information that the establishment or
any of its officers or employees engages
in any fraudulent acts related to foods,
including providing false information to
the certification body or any inspectors
acting on its behalf.
c. Criminal Acts. The certification
body should promptly notify FDA if it
has information that the establishment
or any of its officers or employees has
been convicted of a crime relating to
foods or any crime involving false
statements, fraud, or dishonesty.
12. Conflict of Interest. The
certification body and its inspectors
should be free from conflicts of interest.
These attributes are described in
greater detail in a draft guidance issued
today entitled, ‘‘Voluntary Third Party
Certification Programs for Foods and
Feeds’’ (https://www.fda.gov/oc/
guidance/thirdpartycert.html or https://
www.regulations.gov). The draft
guidance is being distributed for
comment purposes only and is not
intended for implementation at this
time. Certification bodies interested in
participating in this pilot should review
the draft guidance.
Favorable consideration will be given
to third-party certification bodies that:
(1) Currently certify foreign shrimp
processors for controls designed to
ensure the safety of the product from
production through distribution, in
addition to compliance with FDA’s
Seafood HACCP regulations; (2) certify
processors of aquacultured shrimp in
countries that export significant
amounts of aquacultured shrimp to the
United States; and/or (3) are accredited
or are in the process of becoming
accredited by a recognized accreditation
body.
B. Pilot Program and FDA Audit
The pilot program will be conducted
in two phases. Phase I begins with the
issuance of this document and will run
through December 2008. During Phase I,
FDA will receive and evaluate requests
to participate in the pilot, including
conducting paper audits to determine
whether applicants have the attributes
described in this document. During the
paper audit, applicants will be asked to
provide FDA with a list of inspectors for
the products covered under this pilot
and the inspectors’ locations. In
addition, applicants may be asked to
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
39707
provide FDA with other documents
such as certification or recertification
audit reports and product sampling
results.
Phase II will begin in December 2008
with notification of the applicants that
have been selected for participation.
During Phase II, which will run through
June 2009, FDA will conduct onsite
audits of third-party certification
programs by accompanying certain
inspectors during certification and/or
recertification inspections. FDA will
also conduct targeted sampling of
imported shrimp products. FDA may
elect to increase the ‘‘may proceed’’ rate
during Phase II for shrimp products
from certified establishments, if
warranted based on information
generated as a result of participation in
the pilot. FDA’s decision would be
made on a case-by-case basis.
The pilot program will not preclude
FDA, U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, or other agencies from
inspecting or taking other action with
respect to any firm or imported product.
Further, FDA may terminate a certifying
body’s participation in the pilot at any
time for any reason.
C. Duration
FDA plans to conduct the pilot
program for a period of 12 months,
beginning in July 2008. Either phase of
the pilot program may be extended or
shortened as appropriate.
D. Submission of Requests to Participate
Written requests to participate in the
pilot program should be submitted to
the Center for Food Safety and Applied
Nutrition (HFS–325), Food and Drug
Administration, 5100 Paint Branch
Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740.
Electronic requests to participate should
be submitted to
aquaculture@fda.hhs.gov. We strongly
encourage interested persons to
electronically submit their request to
participate. Written and electronic
requests to participate in the pilot
program should be submitted to FDA by
August 25, 2008.
The request to participate should
include the following information:
1. The docket number found in
brackets in the heading of this
document;
2. The applicant’s name, telephone
number, address, and e-mail address;
3. A signed statement indicating the
following:
a. The certification body, its
inspectors, and any subcontractors that
might be used (e.g., laboratories,
sampling services) agree to participate
in the pilot program and are free from
any conflict of interest;
E:\FR\FM\10JYN1.SGM
10JYN1
39708
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 133 / Thursday, July 10, 2008 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
b. The certification body agrees to
undergo an FDA audit of its certification
program, and supply information
requested by FDA for the evaluation of
the participant’s certification program or
of products certified under the program;
and
c. The certification body agrees to: (i)
Immediately notify FDA if an inspector
finds or discovers a situation in which
there is a reasonable probability that
U.S. consumers may consume or be
exposed to a food that could cause
serious adverse health consequences or
death to humans or animals; (ii)
promptly notify FDA if it has
information that the establishment or
any of its officers or employees engages
in any fraudulent acts related to foods,
including providing false information to
the certification body or any inspectors
acting on its behalf; and (iii) promptly
notify FDA if it has information that the
establishment or any of its officers or
employees has been convicted of a
crime relating to foods or any crime
involving false statements, fraud, or
dishonesty.
4. The name and address of each
certified foreign aquaculture shrimp
farming and/or processing facility that
has agreed to participate in the pilot and
to be available for an FDA audit and a
description of the products certified;
5. A detailed written description of
the extent to which the applicant’s
certification program conforms to the 12
attributes listed previously; and
6. Any accreditation the applicant
may have from an accreditation body
operating in accordance with the
International Organization for
Standardization (ISO) standard ISO/IEC
17011, General requirements for
accreditation bodies accrediting
conformity assessment bodies, or
information confirming that the
applicant is in the process of becoming
accredited by such an accreditation
body.
FDA notes that statements made to
FDA as part of this pilot are subject to
the provisions of 18 U.S.C. 1001, which
provides for criminal penalties for
anyone who, among other things, makes
a materially false, fictitious, or
fraudulent statement to the U.S.
government.
E. Evaluation of Pilot Program
FDA intends to evaluate the pilot
program based on several factors,
including, but not limited to, the extent
to which certification provides adequate
assurances of the safety of aquacultured
shrimp from certified establishments,
FDA’s ability to accurately and
efficiently evaluate third-party
certification programs, and FDA’s
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:58 Jul 09, 2008
Jkt 214001
current ability and future needs to
operationalize the recognition of thirdparty certification programs and the
utilization of certification in agency
decision making. After FDA evaluates
the pilot program, the agency may
extend, modify, or terminate the pilot
program.
As noted previously, FDA will take
the results of the pilot program into
consideration in future decisions of
whether to provide incentives for
voluntary certification, including
considering whether to adjust the ‘‘may
proceed’’ rate for imports, and/or begin
the process to recognize voluntary thirdparty certification programs for
aquacultured shrimp or other food or
feed on a non-pilot basis.
Dated: July 7, 2008.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and
Planning.
[FR Doc. E8–15713 Filed 7–9–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Indian Health Service
Division of Nursing, Office of Public
Health Nursing
Funding Opportunity Number: HHS–
2008–IHS–PHN–0001.
Announcement Type: New.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number(s): 93.933.
Key Dates:
Application Deadline Date: August 4,
2008.
Review Date: August 15, 2008.
Award Announcement: August 22,
2008.
Earliest Anticipated Start Date:
August 29, 2008.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
The Indian Health Service (IHS)
Division of Nursing, Office of Public
Health Nursing (PHN) announces a new
competitive grant application for
community based model of PHN case
management services. This program is
authorized under the Snyder Act, 25
U.S.C. 13; Section 301(a), Public Health
Service Act, as amended; and the Indian
Health Care Improvement Act (IHCIA)
25 U.S.C. 1652. This program is
described at 93.933 in the Catalog of
Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA).
The purpose of the program is to
improve health outcomes of high risk
patients through a community case
management model that utilizes the
PHN as case manager. Research
indicates nursing case management is a
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
cost effective way to maximize health
outcomes. The PHN Model of
community based case management
utilizes roles and functions of PHN
services of assessment, planning,
coordinating services, communication
and monitoring. The goals and
outcomes of the PHN Case Management
model are early detection, diagnosis,
treatment and evaluation that will
improve health outcomes in a cost
effective manner. This model utilizes all
prevention components of primary,
secondary and tertiary prevention in the
home with patient and family. The
community based case management
model addresses the scope of practice of
PHN working with individuals and
families in a population-based practice.
Health disparities are greater for
American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN)
communities than the general United
States population. Infant mortality is
greater in the AI/AN population than
United States in general, suicide rates
are greater, unintentional injuries are
greater, and chronic disease is
increasing. This project will focus on a
PHN community based case
management model. The project will be
conducted in a phased approach, using
the nursing process—assessment,
planning, implementation, and
evaluation.
First Phase: Assessment—Conduct a
comprehensive community assessment.
The Senior Nurse Consultant will
recommend a community assessment
tool and provide appropriate training to
the grantees in the Fall of 2008. Include,
if available, pertinent data from the
various community assessments and
local health status data of the
community in the community
assessment.
In addition, obtain input from key
stake-holders such as, community
members and healthcare administration
and community health groups to
determine the health care priorities.
Develop plans for project sustainability.
The PHN case management model
will develop case management services
addressing the priority health issues
identified from the community
assessment. The PHN case management
program will establish policies and
procedures, best practice (BP) for
services, and mechanisms for tracking
outcomes using the recommended PHN
community based case management tool
to improve the health care status.
Second Phase: Planning—After the
community assessment is completed
and priorities for Public Health Nursing
case management services are
determined, planning the case
management model project will begin.
Obtain additional staff training needed
E:\FR\FM\10JYN1.SGM
10JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 133 (Thursday, July 10, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39705-39708]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-15713]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2008-N-0382]
Voluntary Third-Party Certification Programs for Imported
Aquacultured Shrimp; Notice of Pilot Program
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is seeking third-party
certification bodies that certify foreign processors of aquacultured
shrimp for compliance with FDA's Seafood Hazard Analysis and Critical
Control Point (HACCP) regulations to volunteer to participate in a
pilot program to be conducted by FDA's Center for Food Safety and
Applied Nutrition (CFSAN) and Office of Regulatory Affairs (ORA). The
goal of the pilot program is to gather technical and operational
information that will assist FDA in determining its infrastructure
needs, as well as the process for evaluating third-party certification
programs, in order to assist FDA in moving towards broader recognition
of voluntary third-party certification programs, including third-party
certification programs for aquacultured shrimp, at a later time.
DATES: Submit written and electronic requests to participate in the
pilot program by August 25, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Submit written requests to participate in the pilot program
to the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-325), Food and
Drug Administration, 5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740.
Submit electronic requests to participate to aquaculture@fda.hhs.gov.
We strongly encourage interested persons to electronically submit their
request to participate.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brett Koonse, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition (HFS-325), Food and Drug Administration, 5100
Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740, 301-436-1700.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Ensuring the safety of food for human and animal use is a shared
responsibility between the public and private sectors. FDA has the
authority to establish regulatory standards, inspect facilities, and
take action if there are violations, but it is primarily the
responsibility of industry to ensure that foods products intended for
human and animal consumption in the United States are safe and meet
applicable FDA standards. An increasing number of establishments that
sell foods to the public, such as retailers and food service providers,
are independently requesting, as a condition of doing business, that
their suppliers, both foreign and domestic, become certified as meeting
safety (as well as quality) standards. In addition, domestic and
foreign suppliers (such as producers, co-manufacturers, or re-packers)
are increasingly looking to third-party certification programs to
assist them in meeting U.S. requirements.
On July 18, 2007, the President issued Executive Order 13439 to
establish the Interagency Working Group on Import Safety (Working
Group). On November 6, 2007, the Working Group released an ``Action
Plan for Import Safety: A Roadmap for Continual Improvement'' (Action
Plan) (https://www.importsafety.gov/report/actionplan.pdf). The Action
Plan contains 14 broad recommendations and 50 specific short- and long-
term action steps to better protect consumers and enhance the safety of
the increasing volume of imports entering the United States. The Action
Plan stresses the importance of the private sector's responsibility for
the safety of its products and the importance of ongoing private-sector
mechanisms and experience as a basis for ongoing, substantive public-
private collaboration. The public and private sectors have a shared
interest in import safety, and substantive improvement will require
[[Page 39706]]
the careful collaboration of the entire importing community.
Recommendation 2 of the Action Plan is to ``verify compliance of
foreign producers with United States safety and security standards
through certification.'' Third-party certification can augment the
Federal Government's and the importing community's ability to help
ensure that products imported into the United States meet U.S. safety
and security standards. The Action Plan states ``[f]or foreign
producers, the ability to participate in voluntary certification
programs could allow products from firms that comply with U.S. safety
and security standards to enter the United States more quickly. This
would facilitate trade, while allowing federal departments and agencies
to focus their resources on products from non-certified firms or for
which information suggests there may be safety or security concerns.
This would allow federal departments and agencies to more effectively
target their resources.''
Action Steps 2.2 and 2.4 of the Action Plan call for the
recognition or development of voluntary third-party certification
programs, based on risk, for foreign producers of certain products who
export to the United States and the creation of incentives for foreign
firms to participate in voluntary certification programs and for
importers to purchase only from certified firms.
In conjunction with the Action Plan, on November 6, 2007, FDA
released its Food Protection Plan (FPP), a comprehensive strategy
designed to bolster efforts to better protect the Nation's food supply
(https://www.fda.gov/oc/initiatives/advance/food/plan.html). The FPP is
a three-part plan that uses science and a risk-based approach of
prevention, intervention and response to ensure the safety of domestic
as well as imported foods eaten by American consumers. The FPP
emphasizes certification as a way to help verify the safety of products
from a growing food establishment inventory, both foreign and domestic.
On April 2, 2008, FDA published a notice in the Federal Register
(73 FR 17989) requesting comments by May 19, 2008, on the use of third-
party certification programs for foods and animal feeds. The notice was
FDA's first step in soliciting public input in the design and
development or recognition of voluntary third-party certification
programs.
In order to assist FDA in moving towards broader recognition of
third-party certification programs, FDA is now seeking voluntary
participants for a third-party certification pilot program for
aquacultured shrimp. This pilot program is the next step in gathering
technical and operational information that will assist FDA in
determining its infrastructure needs. The information from this pilot
also will assist with subsequent steps, such as developing the process
for evaluating third-party certification programs should FDA decide to
recognize voluntary third-party certification programs and to consider
certification in its decision making. Certification might be
considered, for example, in decision making regarding determination of
establishment inspection priorities, entry admissibly, field exam and
sampling priorities, ``may proceed'' rates, and requests by firms to
have their products removed from an import alert. If FDA were to
recognize third-party certification programs, we would do so on a
product-by-product basis. We would also provide an opportunity for both
foreign and domestic certification bodies to voluntarily seek FDA
recognition and for foreign and domestic establishments to voluntarily
seek certification.
II. Voluntary Third-Party Certification Pilot Program
A. Scope and Selection Attributes
FDA is seeking a limited number of third-party certification bodies
(such as private, non-government entities, other Federal government,
State government, and foreign government agencies) that currently
certify foreign processors of aquacultured shrimp for compliance with
FDA's Seafood HACCP regulations to volunteer to participate in the
pilot program. Participants in the pilot program will be asked to
provide FDA with technical feedback on the pilot.
A limited number of voluntary participants are needed for the pilot
program. The agency will use its discretion in choosing participants
for Phase II of the pilot (see following discussion) from those who
apply during Phase I of the pilot based on the following attributes:
1. Authority of the Certification Body. The certification body
should have the authority to perform inspection activities, collect and
evaluate records, collect and analyze samples, and assess and report on
compliance as necessary to ensure certification standards and
requirements are met and maintained.
2. Qualification and Training for Inspectors. The certification
body should ensure that its inspectors are adequately trained to
perform their work assignments. Such training includes course work,
field work, and continuing education.
3. Elements of an Effective Inspection Program. The certification
body should ensure that its inspectors are consistently using
established, widely-recognized standards when performing inspections.
The inspector should prioritize and target the elements of producing,
manufacturing, processing, packing, and holding that pose the greatest
risk to human and/or animal health. The certification body should have
written policies and procedures describing the protocol to be used by
all inspectors during an inspection. During an inspection, inspectors
should verify that the establishments and products meet and maintain
certification criteria that include the following:
The processor is in compliance with applicable FDA
regulatory requirements for food, including FDA's Seafood HACCP
regulations;
If appropriate, the processor has in place, and
effectively executes, management systems that ensure the safety of all
shrimp products, from production to distribution, as applicable,
including the feed used, the hatchery, the growing area, harvesting,
processing, and transportation. This may include a preventive control
program for farms (e.g., Good Aquaculture Practices, Best Management
Practices, farmer training along with farm inspections), a verification
program (e.g., an effective testing scheme to ensure products are free
of unapproved drugs, chemicals, and pathogens), a traceability program,
or recall and follow-up procedures in case of an outbreak or illness
associated with a product.
4. Inspection Audit Program. The third-party certification body
should conduct audits of its inspections to assess the effectiveness of
the inspections and sample collections and to ensure the competency and
consistency of its inspectors.
5. Cooperation with FDA and Other Appropriate Government Officials
When Safety Problems Occur. The certification body should cooperate as
necessary with FDA and other appropriate government authorities if the
certification body discovers a situation in which there is a reasonable
probability that U.S. consumers may consume or be exposed to a food
product that could cause serious adverse health consequences or death
to humans or animals, whether the contamination or problem was caused
intentionally or unintentionally. Such cooperation may include
notification to relevant agencies inside and outside of the United
States, where the food is sold or distributed. Moreover, when FDA has
reliable information from the Centers for
[[Page 39707]]
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) or other reliable sources about a
health risk associated with an FDA-regulated food product and FDA is
conducting a traceback of a product, FDA may request information from
the certification body regarding the supply chain. Such information may
be requested based on preliminary information that an establishment
under the certification program may be implicated. The certification
body should provide FDA with this information in a timely manner. Such
information would be disclosed (or protected from disclosure) in
accordance with applicable laws and policies.
6. Compliance and Corrective Action. The certification body should
have strategies, procedures, and actions to ensure the establishments
and products it certifies comply with FDA laws and regulations and
otherwise meet certification standards, to take action when there is
non-compliance, and to evaluate the effectiveness of corrective action
programs.
7. Industry Relations. At a minimum, the certification body should
provide establishments seeking certification with information about
current FDA requirements and guidances.
8. Resources. The certification body should have sufficient
resources, such as technological tools and infrastructure, to carry out
its certification program.
9. Self-Assessment of Overall Certification Program. In addition to
auditing the inspection program, the certification body should assess
the effectiveness of the certification program as a whole.
10. Laboratories. The certification body should have access to
laboratory services to support the program functions. The laboratories
should be accredited by an accreditation body operating in accordance
with International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standard 120/
IEC 17011, General requirements for Accreditation bodies accrediting
conformity assessment bodies.
11. Notifications to FDA. The certification body should promptly
notify FDA of problems or changes that can affect product safety or
security. We expect prompt notification of the following:
a. Safety Issues. The certification body should immediately notify
FDA if an inspector finds or discovers a situation in which there is a
reasonable probability that U.S. consumers may consume or be exposed to
a food that could cause serious adverse health consequences or death to
humans or animals. This information may pertain to intentional or
unintentional contamination. The certification body should provide
detailed information that describes the extent and nature of the
problem and allows us to identify the product and source, including
traceability records.
b. Fraud. The certification body should promptly notify FDA if it
has information that the establishment or any of its officers or
employees engages in any fraudulent acts related to foods, including
providing false information to the certification body or any inspectors
acting on its behalf.
c. Criminal Acts. The certification body should promptly notify FDA
if it has information that the establishment or any of its officers or
employees has been convicted of a crime relating to foods or any crime
involving false statements, fraud, or dishonesty.
12. Conflict of Interest. The certification body and its inspectors
should be free from conflicts of interest.
These attributes are described in greater detail in a draft
guidance issued today entitled, ``Voluntary Third Party Certification
Programs for Foods and Feeds'' (https://www.fda.gov/oc/guidance/
thirdpartycert.html or https://www.regulations.gov). The draft guidance
is being distributed for comment purposes only and is not intended for
implementation at this time. Certification bodies interested in
participating in this pilot should review the draft guidance.
Favorable consideration will be given to third-party certification
bodies that: (1) Currently certify foreign shrimp processors for
controls designed to ensure the safety of the product from production
through distribution, in addition to compliance with FDA's Seafood
HACCP regulations; (2) certify processors of aquacultured shrimp in
countries that export significant amounts of aquacultured shrimp to the
United States; and/or (3) are accredited or are in the process of
becoming accredited by a recognized accreditation body.
B. Pilot Program and FDA Audit
The pilot program will be conducted in two phases. Phase I begins
with the issuance of this document and will run through December 2008.
During Phase I, FDA will receive and evaluate requests to participate
in the pilot, including conducting paper audits to determine whether
applicants have the attributes described in this document. During the
paper audit, applicants will be asked to provide FDA with a list of
inspectors for the products covered under this pilot and the
inspectors' locations. In addition, applicants may be asked to provide
FDA with other documents such as certification or recertification audit
reports and product sampling results.
Phase II will begin in December 2008 with notification of the
applicants that have been selected for participation. During Phase II,
which will run through June 2009, FDA will conduct onsite audits of
third-party certification programs by accompanying certain inspectors
during certification and/or recertification inspections. FDA will also
conduct targeted sampling of imported shrimp products. FDA may elect to
increase the ``may proceed'' rate during Phase II for shrimp products
from certified establishments, if warranted based on information
generated as a result of participation in the pilot. FDA's decision
would be made on a case-by-case basis.
The pilot program will not preclude FDA, U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, or other agencies from inspecting or taking other action
with respect to any firm or imported product. Further, FDA may
terminate a certifying body's participation in the pilot at any time
for any reason.
C. Duration
FDA plans to conduct the pilot program for a period of 12 months,
beginning in July 2008. Either phase of the pilot program may be
extended or shortened as appropriate.
D. Submission of Requests to Participate
Written requests to participate in the pilot program should be
submitted to the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-
325), Food and Drug Administration, 5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College
Park, MD 20740. Electronic requests to participate should be submitted
to aquaculture@fda.hhs.gov. We strongly encourage interested persons to
electronically submit their request to participate. Written and
electronic requests to participate in the pilot program should be
submitted to FDA by August 25, 2008.
The request to participate should include the following
information:
1. The docket number found in brackets in the heading of this
document;
2. The applicant's name, telephone number, address, and e-mail
address;
3. A signed statement indicating the following:
a. The certification body, its inspectors, and any subcontractors
that might be used (e.g., laboratories, sampling services) agree to
participate in the pilot program and are free from any conflict of
interest;
[[Page 39708]]
b. The certification body agrees to undergo an FDA audit of its
certification program, and supply information requested by FDA for the
evaluation of the participant's certification program or of products
certified under the program; and
c. The certification body agrees to: (i) Immediately notify FDA if
an inspector finds or discovers a situation in which there is a
reasonable probability that U.S. consumers may consume or be exposed to
a food that could cause serious adverse health consequences or death to
humans or animals; (ii) promptly notify FDA if it has information that
the establishment or any of its officers or employees engages in any
fraudulent acts related to foods, including providing false information
to the certification body or any inspectors acting on its behalf; and
(iii) promptly notify FDA if it has information that the establishment
or any of its officers or employees has been convicted of a crime
relating to foods or any crime involving false statements, fraud, or
dishonesty.
4. The name and address of each certified foreign aquaculture
shrimp farming and/or processing facility that has agreed to
participate in the pilot and to be available for an FDA audit and a
description of the products certified;
5. A detailed written description of the extent to which the
applicant's certification program conforms to the 12 attributes listed
previously; and
6. Any accreditation the applicant may have from an accreditation
body operating in accordance with the International Organization for
Standardization (ISO) standard ISO/IEC 17011, General requirements for
accreditation bodies accrediting conformity assessment bodies, or
information confirming that the applicant is in the process of becoming
accredited by such an accreditation body.
FDA notes that statements made to FDA as part of this pilot are
subject to the provisions of 18 U.S.C. 1001, which provides for
criminal penalties for anyone who, among other things, makes a
materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement to the U.S.
government.
E. Evaluation of Pilot Program
FDA intends to evaluate the pilot program based on several factors,
including, but not limited to, the extent to which certification
provides adequate assurances of the safety of aquacultured shrimp from
certified establishments, FDA's ability to accurately and efficiently
evaluate third-party certification programs, and FDA's current ability
and future needs to operationalize the recognition of third-party
certification programs and the utilization of certification in agency
decision making. After FDA evaluates the pilot program, the agency may
extend, modify, or terminate the pilot program.
As noted previously, FDA will take the results of the pilot program
into consideration in future decisions of whether to provide incentives
for voluntary certification, including considering whether to adjust
the ``may proceed'' rate for imports, and/or begin the process to
recognize voluntary third-party certification programs for aquacultured
shrimp or other food or feed on a non-pilot basis.
Dated: July 7, 2008.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.
[FR Doc. E8-15713 Filed 7-9-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S