Request for Public Comment on Proposed Guidelines Regarding Help America Vote Act (HAVA) Section 254(a)(11), 39679-39680 [E8-15690]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 133 / Thursday, July 10, 2008 / Notices
Contract Policy Division, GSA (202)
501–3775.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Purpose
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[OMB Control No. 9000–0095]
Federal Acquisition Regulation;
Submission for OMB Review;
Commerce Patent Regulations
Department of Defense (DOD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of request for comments
regarding an extension to an existing
OMB clearance.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
AGENCIES:
SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR)
Secretariat has submitted to the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) a
request to review and approve an
extension of a currently approved
information collection requirement
concerning commerce patent
regulations. A request for public
comments was published in the Federal
Register at 73 FR 10006, February 25,
2008. No comments were received.
Public comments are particularly
invited on: Whether this collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of functions of the FAR,
and whether it will have practical
utility; whether our estimate of the
public burden of this collection of
information is accurate, and based on
valid assumptions and methodology;
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways in which we can
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on those who are to
respond, through the use of appropriate
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
August 11, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments regarding
this burden estimate or any other aspect
of this collection of information,
including suggestions for reducing this
burden to the General Services
Administration, Regulatory Secretariat
Division, 1800 F Street, NW., Room
4041, Washington, DC 20405. Please cite
OMB Control No. 9000–0095,
Commerce Patent Regulations, in all
correspondence.
As a result of the Department of
Commerce (Commerce) publishing a
final rule in the Federal Register
implementing Public Law 98–620 (52
FR 8552, March 18, 1987), a revision to
FAR Subpart 27.3 to implement the
Commerce regulation was published in
the Federal Register as an interim rule
on June 12, 1989 (54 FR 25060). The
final rule was published without change
on June 21, 1990.
A Government contractor must report
all subject inventions to the contracting
officer, submit a disclosure of the
invention, and identify any publication,
or sale, or public use of the invention
(52.227–11(c), 52.227–12(c), and
52.227–13(e)(2)). Contractors are
required to submit periodic or interim
and final reports listing subject
inventions (27.303(b)uuuuuuui(2)(i) and
(ii)). In order to ensure that subject
inventions are reported, the contractor
is required to establish and maintain
effective procedures for identifying and
disclosing subject inventions (52.227–
11, Alternate IV; 52.227–13(e)(1)). In
addition, the contractor must require his
employees, by written agreements, to
disclose subject inventions (52.227–
11(f)(2); 52.227–12(e)(2); 52.227–
13(e)(4)). The contractor also has an
obligation to utilize the subject
invention, and agree to report, upon
request, the utilization or efforts to
utilize the subject invention (27.302(e);
52.227–11(f); 52.227–12(f)).
B. Annual Reporting Burden
Respondents: 1,200.
Responses per Respondent: 9.75.
Total Responses: 11,700.
Hours per Response: 3.9.
Total Burden Hours: 45,630.
Obtaining Copies of Proposals:
Requesters may obtain a copy of the
information collection documents from
the General Services Administration,
Regulatory Secretariat Division (VPR),
Room 4041, 1800 F Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20405, telephone (202)
501–4755. Please cite OMB Control No.
9000–0095, Commerce Patent
Regulations, in all correspondence.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dated: July 3, 2008.
Al Matera,
Director, Office of Acquisition Policy.
[FR Doc. E8–15744 Filed 7–9–08; 8:45 am]
Ernest Woodson, Procurement Analyst,
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:58 Jul 09, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
39679
ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION
Request for Public Comment on
Proposed Guidelines Regarding Help
America Vote Act (HAVA) Section
254(a)(11)
Election Assistance
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The EAC seeks public
comment on proposed guidelines
designed to assist States in determining
what constitutes a ‘‘material change in
the administration of a State plan’’
under HAVA Section 254(a)(11).
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before 4 p.m. on August 11, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Comments must be
submitted in either electronic or written
form. Comments may be submitted
electronically to havafunding@eac.gov.
E-mail comments should contain ‘‘State
Plan Guidelines Comments’’ in the
subject line. Written comments should
be sent to: State Plan Guidelines
Comments, U.S. Election Assistance
Commission, 1225 New York Ave., NW.,
Suite 150, Washington, DC 20005.
Commenters are encouraged to submit
comments electronically to ensure
timely receipt and consideration.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
´
Edgardo Cortes, Acting Division
Director, Election Administration
Support Division, (202) 566–3100 or
toll-free (866) 747–1471.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Guidelines on HAVA Section
254(a)(11): Material Changes in the
Administration of HAVA State Plans
A material change in the
administration of the State plan
(material change), as referenced by the
Help America Vote Act (HAVA) Section
254(a)(11), occurs under five different
circumstances. These guidelines are
based on the general federal
requirements for updating State plans
and post award changes contained in
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–102 (41 CFR part 105–71).
Material changes require a State to
amend the State plan according to the
provisions of HAVA Sections 254, 255,
and 256. The examples provided below
may not be applicable in all
circumstances; likewise, the specific
instances for when the State plan
should be amended are not limited to
the examples provided. The Election
Assistance Commission (EAC) advises
States to amend the State plan in the
event of any of following five
circumstances:
(1) New or revised Federal laws or
regulations affecting HAVA
E:\FR\FM\10JYN1.SGM
10JYN1
39680
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 133 / Thursday, July 10, 2008 / Notices
implementation. [Based on requirement
in 41 CFR 105–71.111(d)(1)]
New or amended Federal statutes or
regulations, including appropriations
statutes, resulting in a change in scope,
purpose, budget, or period of
availability of funds requires an
amended State plan.
Example: Congress passes legislation to
amend the Title III requirements of HAVA.
(2) New or revised State law,
organization, or policy affecting HAVA
implementation. [Based on requirement
in 41 CFR 105–71.111(d)(2)]
New or amended State statutes,
organization, or policy resulting in a
change in scope, purpose, budget, or
period of availability of funds requires
an amended State plan.
Example: (1) State legislation is passed that
changes the voting equipment requirements
for the State, thus changing the method of
implementation of Title III Voting Systems
requirements; (2) The responsibility for
implementing the plan was previously with
the State Attorney General and has now
changed to Secretary of State.
(3) A budget change of 10 percent or
more of the HAVA fiscal year’s
cumulative budget across budgeted
programs, activities, functions or
activities. [Based on requirement in 41
CFR 105–71.130(c)(1)(ii)]
A change of more than 10 percent of
the cumulative budget of the fiscal
year’s requirement payment from one
budgeted category to another requires an
amended State plan.
Example: A portion of funds, greater than
10 percent of the requirements payment
received, budgeted for use in developing the
Computerized Statewide Voter Registration
List is determined to no longer be needed for
the budgeted purpose, and the State would
like to use the funds for improvements to the
administration of Federal elections.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
(4) A revision in the scope or
objective of the project. [Based on
requirement in 41 CFR 105–
71.130(d)(1)]
A change in the means by which a
State plans to achieve the HAVA
objectives requires an amended State
plan.
Example: (1) The State decides to purchase
equipment at the State level instead of
subgranting to the counties; (2) The State
changes the development of the
Computerized Statewide Voter Registration
List from a bottom up system to a state
centralized system; (3) The State files a
certification under HAVA Section
251(b)(2)(A), indicating that the State has
implemented the requirements of Title III
and will use the requirements payments to
carry out other activities to improve the
administration of elections for Federal office,
and did not account for post-Title III
compliance activities in the original State
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:58 Jul 09, 2008
Jkt 214001
plan; (4) The State changes the type of voting
system originally planned for use in Title III
compliance; the State decides to use an
optical scan system with ballot marking
devices instead of a direct recording
electronic (DRE) system.
(5) An extension in the period of
availability of HAVA funds. [Based on
requirement in 41 CFR 105–
71.130(d)(2)]
An increase in the amount of funding
authorized under HAVA appropriated to
the State not provided for in the original
State plan or funds remaining in a fiscal
year not covered by the original State
plan requires an amended State plan.
Example: (1) A new requirements payment
is appropriated for a fiscal year not covered
by the State plan; (2) The State has funds
from a previous fiscal year’s requirements
payment remaining in a fiscal year not
provided for under the current State plan.
Dated: July 2, 2008.
Thomas R. Wilkey,
Executive Director, U.S. Election Assistance
Commission.
[FR Doc. E8–15690 Filed 7–9–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–KF–P
[Case No. CAC–011]
Energy Conservation Program for
Consumer Products: Decision and
Order Granting a Waiver to Daikin U.S.
Corporation From the Department of
Energy Commercial Package Air
Conditioner and Heat Pump Test
Procedures and Denying a Waiver
From the Residential Central Air
Conditioner and Heat Pump Test
Procedures
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Decision and Order.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice publishes the
Department of Energy’s Decision and
Order in Case No. CAC–011, which
grants a waiver to Daikin U.S.
Corporation (Daikin) from the existing
Department of Energy (DOE)
commercial package air conditioner and
heat pump test procedures for specified
VRV (commercial) Variable Refrigerant
Volume multi-split heat pumps and heat
recovery systems. As a condition of this
waiver, Daikin must test and rate its
VRV multi-split products according to
the alternate test procedure as set forth
in this notice. DOE is denying as moot
Daikin’s request for a waiver from the
residential central air conditioner and
heat pump test procedures, because
those test procedures, as amended and
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
This Decision and Order is
effective July 10, 2008, and will remain
in effect until the effective date of a DOE
final rule prescribing amended test
procedures appropriate for the model
series of Daikin VRV multi-split central
air conditioners and heat pumps
covered by this waiver.
DATES:
Dr.
Michael G. Raymond, U.S. Department
of Energy, Building Technologies
Program, Mailstop EE–2J, Forrestal
Building, 1000 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20585–0121.
Telephone: (202) 586–9611. E-mail:
Michael.Raymond@ee.doe.gov.
Ms. Francine Pinto or Mr. Eric Stas,
U.S. Department of Energy, Office of
General Counsel, Mailstop GC–72,
Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585–
0103. Telephone: (202) 586–9507. Email: Francine.Pinto@hq.doe.gov or
Eric.Stas@hq.doe.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
In
accordance with 10 CFR 430.27(l) and
10 CFR 431.401(f)(4), DOE gives notice
of the issuance of its Decision and Order
as set forth below. In the Decision and
Order, DOE grants Daikin a waiver from
the existing DOE commercial package
air conditioner and heat pump test
procedures 1 for its VRV multi-split
products, subject to a condition
requiring Daikin to test and rate its VRV
multi-split products pursuant to the
alternate test procedure provided in this
notice. Further, today’s Decision and
Order requires that Daikin may not
make any representations concerning
the energy efficiency of these products
unless such product has been tested in
accordance with the DOE test
procedure, consistent with the
provisions and restrictions of the
alternate test procedure set forth in the
Decision and Order below, and such
representations fairly disclose the
results of such testing.2 (42 U.S.C.
6293(c); 42 U.S.C. 6314(d))
DOE is denying as moot Daikin’s
request for a waiver from the DOE
residential central air conditioner and
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
PO 00000
currently effective, can be used to test
Daikin’s VRV–S (residential) products.
Sfmt 4703
1 For commercial products, the applicable test
procedure is the Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration
Institute (ARI) Standard 340/360–2004,
‘‘Performance Rating of Commercial and Industrial
Unitary Air-Conditioning and Heat Pump
Equipment’’ (incorporated by reference at 10 CFR
431.95(b)(2)).
2 Consistent with the statute, distributors,
retailers, and private labelers are held to the same
standard when making representations regarding
the energy efficiency of these products. (42 U.S.C.
6293(c); 42 U.S.C. 6314(d)).
E:\FR\FM\10JYN1.SGM
10JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 133 (Thursday, July 10, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39679-39680]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-15690]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION
Request for Public Comment on Proposed Guidelines Regarding Help
America Vote Act (HAVA) Section 254(a)(11)
AGENCY: Election Assistance Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The EAC seeks public comment on proposed guidelines designed
to assist States in determining what constitutes a ``material change in
the administration of a State plan'' under HAVA Section 254(a)(11).
DATES: Comments must be received on or before 4 p.m. on August 11,
2008.
ADDRESSES: Comments must be submitted in either electronic or written
form. Comments may be submitted electronically to havafunding@eac.gov.
E-mail comments should contain ``State Plan Guidelines Comments'' in
the subject line. Written comments should be sent to: State Plan
Guidelines Comments, U.S. Election Assistance Commission, 1225 New York
Ave., NW., Suite 150, Washington, DC 20005. Commenters are encouraged
to submit comments electronically to ensure timely receipt and
consideration.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Edgardo Cort[eacute]s, Acting
Division Director, Election Administration Support Division, (202) 566-
3100 or toll-free (866) 747-1471.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Guidelines on HAVA Section 254(a)(11): Material Changes in the
Administration of HAVA State Plans
A material change in the administration of the State plan (material
change), as referenced by the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) Section
254(a)(11), occurs under five different circumstances. These guidelines
are based on the general federal requirements for updating State plans
and post award changes contained in Office of Management and Budget
Circular A-102 (41 CFR part 105-71). Material changes require a State
to amend the State plan according to the provisions of HAVA Sections
254, 255, and 256. The examples provided below may not be applicable in
all circumstances; likewise, the specific instances for when the State
plan should be amended are not limited to the examples provided. The
Election Assistance Commission (EAC) advises States to amend the State
plan in the event of any of following five circumstances:
(1) New or revised Federal laws or regulations affecting HAVA
[[Page 39680]]
implementation. [Based on requirement in 41 CFR 105-71.111(d)(1)]
New or amended Federal statutes or regulations, including
appropriations statutes, resulting in a change in scope, purpose,
budget, or period of availability of funds requires an amended State
plan.
Example: Congress passes legislation to amend the Title III
requirements of HAVA.
(2) New or revised State law, organization, or policy affecting
HAVA implementation. [Based on requirement in 41 CFR 105-71.111(d)(2)]
New or amended State statutes, organization, or policy resulting in
a change in scope, purpose, budget, or period of availability of funds
requires an amended State plan.
Example: (1) State legislation is passed that changes the voting
equipment requirements for the State, thus changing the method of
implementation of Title III Voting Systems requirements; (2) The
responsibility for implementing the plan was previously with the
State Attorney General and has now changed to Secretary of State.
(3) A budget change of 10 percent or more of the HAVA fiscal year's
cumulative budget across budgeted programs, activities, functions or
activities. [Based on requirement in 41 CFR 105-71.130(c)(1)(ii)]
A change of more than 10 percent of the cumulative budget of the
fiscal year's requirement payment from one budgeted category to another
requires an amended State plan.
Example: A portion of funds, greater than 10 percent of the
requirements payment received, budgeted for use in developing the
Computerized Statewide Voter Registration List is determined to no
longer be needed for the budgeted purpose, and the State would like
to use the funds for improvements to the administration of Federal
elections.
(4) A revision in the scope or objective of the project. [Based on
requirement in 41 CFR 105-71.130(d)(1)]
A change in the means by which a State plans to achieve the HAVA
objectives requires an amended State plan.
Example: (1) The State decides to purchase equipment at the
State level instead of subgranting to the counties; (2) The State
changes the development of the Computerized Statewide Voter
Registration List from a bottom up system to a state centralized
system; (3) The State files a certification under HAVA Section
251(b)(2)(A), indicating that the State has implemented the
requirements of Title III and will use the requirements payments to
carry out other activities to improve the administration of
elections for Federal office, and did not account for post-Title III
compliance activities in the original State plan; (4) The State
changes the type of voting system originally planned for use in
Title III compliance; the State decides to use an optical scan
system with ballot marking devices instead of a direct recording
electronic (DRE) system.
(5) An extension in the period of availability of HAVA funds.
[Based on requirement in 41 CFR 105-71.130(d)(2)]
An increase in the amount of funding authorized under HAVA
appropriated to the State not provided for in the original State plan
or funds remaining in a fiscal year not covered by the original State
plan requires an amended State plan.
Example: (1) A new requirements payment is appropriated for a
fiscal year not covered by the State plan; (2) The State has funds
from a previous fiscal year's requirements payment remaining in a
fiscal year not provided for under the current State plan.
Dated: July 2, 2008.
Thomas R. Wilkey,
Executive Director, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
[FR Doc. E8-15690 Filed 7-9-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-KF-P