Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Extension, 38451-38453 [E8-15143]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 130 / Monday, July 7, 2008 / Notices inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/. Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than July 28, 2008. A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Todd Offenbacker, Assistant Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198–0001: 1. Stockmens Limited Partnership, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 66.85 percent of the voting shares of Stockmens Financial Corporation, both of Rapid City, South Dakota, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Security First Bank, Lincoln, Nebraska; Homestead Financial Corporation, and The First National Bank and Trust Company, both in Beatrice, Nebraska. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 27, 2008. Jennifer J. Johnson, Secretary of the Board. [FR Doc. E8–14966 Filed 7–3–08; 8:45 am] Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 30, 2008. Robert deV. Frierson, Deputy Secretary of the Board. [FR Doc. E8–15169 Filed 7–3–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6210–01–S BILLING CODE 6210–01–S FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding Companies mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below. The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/. Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than July 28, 2008. A. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland (Douglas A. Banks, Vice President) 1455 East Sixth Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44101-2566: 1. Rurban Financial Corp., Defiance, Ohio; to acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of NBM Bancorp, Inc., Montpelier, Ohio, and thereby indirectly acquire National Bank of Montpelier, Montpelier, Ohio. Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible Nonbanking Activities The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below. The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:39 Jul 03, 2008 Jkt 214001 The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or control voting securities or assets of a company, including the companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in § 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible for PO 00000 Frm 00063 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 38451 bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States. Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/. Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than July 25, 2008. A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Burl Thornton, Assistant Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690–1414: 1. FBOP Corporation, Oak Park, Illinois, to acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of PFF Bancorp, Inc., Rancho Cucamonga, California, and thereby indirectly acquire PFF Bank & Trust, Pomona, California, and thereby engage in operating a savings association, pursuant to section 225.28(b)(4)(ii) of Regulation Y; Diversified Builders Services, Inc., Rancho Cucamonga, California, and thereby engage in extending credit and servicing loans, pursuant to section 225.28(b)(1) of Regulation Y; Glencrest Investment Advisers, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and thereby engage in financial and investment advisory services, pursuant to section 225.28(b)(6)(i) of Regulation Y; and Pomona Financial Services, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and thereby engage in trust company functions, pursuant to section 225.28(b)(5) of Regulation Y. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 30, 2008. Robert deV. Frierson, Deputy Secretary of the Board. [FR Doc. E8–15167 Filed 7–3–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6210–01–S FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Extension Federal Trade Commission (‘‘Commission’’ or ‘‘FTC’’). ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The information collection requirements described below will be submitted to the Office of Management E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM 07JYN1 38452 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 130 / Monday, July 7, 2008 / Notices and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) for review, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (‘‘PRA’’). The FTC is seeking public comments on its proposal to extend through October 31, 2011, the current PRA clearance for information collection requirements contained in the Commission’s Business Opportunity Rule (‘‘Rule’’). The current clearance expires on October 31, 2008. Comments must be submitted on or before September 5, 2008. DATES: Interested parties are invited to submit written comments. Comments should refer to ‘‘16 CFR Part 437: Paperwork Comment, FTC File No. R511993’’ to facilitate the organization of comments. A comment filed in paper form should include this reference both in the text and on the envelope and should be mailed or delivered to the following address: Federal Trade Commission, Room H-135 (Annex J), 600 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580. The Commission is requesting that any comment filed in paper form be sent by courier or overnight service, if possible because U.S. postal mail in the Washington area and at the FTC is subject to delay due to heightened security precautions. Moreover, because paper mail in the Washington area and at the FTC is subject to delay, please consider submitting your comments in electronic form, as prescribed below. If, however, the comment contains any material for which confidential treatment is requested, it must be filed in paper form, and the first page of the document must be clearly labeled ‘‘Confidential.’’1 Comments filed in electronic form should be submitted by following the instructions on the web-based form at (https://secure.commentworks.com/ftcbizopPRA) and following the instructions on the web-based form. To ensure that the Commission considers an electronic comment, you must file it on the web-based form at: (https:// secure.commentworks.com/ftcbizopPRA). If this notice appears at www.regulations.gov, you may also file an electronic comment through that website. The Commission will consider all comments that www.regulations.gov forwards to it. mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES ADDRESSES: 1 Commission Rule 4.2(d), 16 CFR 4.2(d). The comment must be accompanied by an explicit request for confidential treatment, including the factual and legal basis for the request, and must identify the specific portions of the comment to be withheld from the public record. The request will be granted or denied by the Commission’s General Counsel, consistent with applicable law and the public interest. See Commission Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c). VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:39 Jul 03, 2008 Jkt 214001 The FTC Act and other laws the Commission administers permit the collection of public comments to consider and use in this proceeding as appropriate. All timely and responsive public comments will be considered by the Commission and will be available to the public on the FTC website, to the extent practicable, at www.ftc.gov. As a matter of discretion, the FTC makes every effort to remove home contact information for individuals from the public comments it receives before placing those comments on the FTC website. More information, including routine uses permitted by the Privacy Act, may be found in the FTC’s privacy policy at (https://www.ftc.gov/ftc/ privacy.shtm). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Monica Vaca, Attorney, Division of Marketing Practices, Bureau of Consumer Protection, (202) 326-2245, Federal Trade Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington D.C. 20580. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3501-3521, federal agencies must obtain approval from OMB for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor. ‘‘Collection of information’’ means agency requests or requirements that members of the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a third party. 44 U.S.C. 3502(3), 5 CFR 1320.3(c). As required by section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, the FTC is providing this opportunity for public comment before requesting that OMB extend the existing paperwork clearance for the Business Opportunity Rule, 16 CFR Part 437 (OMB Control Number 3084-0142). The FTC invites comments on: (1) whether the proposed collection of information required by the Rule is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. The Rule is designed to ensure that prospective purchasers of a business opportunity receive information that PO 00000 Frm 00064 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 will help them evaluate the opportunity that is presented to them. Part 437 was promulgated in March of 2007, concurrently with the amendment of the Franchise Rule, Part 436. Part 437 mirrors the requirements and prohibitions of the original Franchise Rule, and imposes no additional disclosure or recordkeeping obligations or prohibitions.2 The Rule requires business opportunity sellers to furnish to prospective purchasers a disclosure document that provides information relating to the seller, the seller’s business, the nature of the proposed business opportunity, as well as additional information regarding any claims about actual or potential sales, income, or profits for a prospective business opportunity purchaser. The seller must also preserve information that forms a reasonable basis for such claims. These requirements are subject to the PRA. The FTC is seeking to extend the current PRA clearance to October 31, 2011.3 Estimated annual hours burden: 16,750 hours Based on a review of trade publications and information from state regulatory authorities, staff believes that, on average, from year to year, there are approximately 2,500 business opportunity sellers, with perhaps about 10% of that total reflecting an equal amount of new and departing business entrants. The burden estimates for compliance will vary depending on the particular business opportunity seller’s prior experience with the original Franchise Rule. Staff estimates that 250 or so new business opportunity sellers will enter the market each year, requiring approximately 30 hours each to develop a Rule-compliant disclosure document. Thus, staff estimates that the cumulative 2 In March of 2008, the Commission published the Business Opportunity Rule Revised Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 73 FR 16110 (March 26, 2008) (‘‘Notice’’). The Notice proposed amending the Business Opportunity Rule substantially, and would, among other things, reduce the number of required disclosures by sellers of business opportunities to prospective purchasers. Conversely, the Notice proposed amending the rule to expand the coverage of entities required to make disclosures to include a broader array of business opportunities than those covered by the original Franchise Rule. For now, however, only those businesses opportunities covered by the original Franchise Rule — such as vending machine and rack display opportunities — remain covered under part 437. 3 The current clearance under recently assigned OMB Control Number 3084-0142 covers the terms of the original Franchise Rule as applied to business opportunity sellers. The portion of clearance applicable to franchisors under Part 436 is separately assigned to pre-existing OMB Control Number 3084-0107. E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM 07JYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 130 / Monday, July 7, 2008 / Notices annual disclosure burden for new business opportunity sellers will be approximately 7,500 hours. Staff further estimates that the remaining 2,250 established business opportunity sellers will require no more than approximately 3 hours each to update their disclosure document. Accordingly, staff estimates that the cumulative annual disclosure burden for established business opportunity sellers will be approximately 6,750 hours. Business opportunity sellers may need to maintain additional documentation for the sale of business opportunities in states not currently requiring these records as part of their regulation of business opportunity sellers. This could take up to an additional hour of recordkeeping per year. Accordingly, staff estimates that business opportunity sellers will cumulatively incur approximately 2,500 hours of recordkeeping burden each year (2,500 business opportunity sellers x 1 hour). Thus, the total burden for business opportunity sellers is approximately 16,750 hours (7,500 hours of disclosure burden for new business opportunity sellers + 6,750 hours of disclosure burden for established business opportunity sellers + 2,500 of recordkeeping burden for all business opportunity sellers). mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES Estimated annual labor cost: $3,595,000 Labor costs are determined by applying applicable wage rates to associated burden hours. Staff presumes an attorney will prepare or update the disclosure document at an estimated $250 per hour. As applied, this would yield approximately $3,562,500 in labor costs attributable to compliance with the Rule’s disclosure requirements ((250 new business opportunity sellers x $250 per hour x 30 hours per seller) + (2,250 established business opportunity sellers x $250 per hour x 3 hours per seller)). Staff anticipates that recordkeeping would be performed by clerical staff at approximately $13 per hour. At 2,500 hours per year for all affected business opportunity sellers (see above), this would amount to a total cost of $32,500. Thus, the combined labor costs for recordkeeping and disclosure for business opportunity sellers is approximately $3,595,000. Estimated non-labor cost: $3,887,500 Business opportunity sellers must also incur costs to print and distribute the disclosure document. These costs vary based upon the length of the disclosures and the number of copies produced to meet the expected demand. Staff estimates that 2,500 business VerDate Aug<31>2005 19:10 Jul 03, 2008 Jkt 214001 opportunity sellers print and mail 100 documents per year at a cost of $15 per document, for a total cost of $3,750,000 (2,500 business opportunity sellers x 100 documents per year x $15 per document). Business opportunity sellers must also complete and disseminate an FTCrequired cover sheet that identifies the business opportunity seller, the date the document is issued, a table of contents, and a notice that tracks the language specifically provided in the Rule. Although some of the language in the cover sheet is supplied by the government for the purpose of disclosure to the public, and is thus excluded from the definition of ‘‘collection of information’’ under the PRA, see 5 CFR 1320.3(c)(2), there are residual costs to print and mail these cover sheets, including within them the presentation of related information beyond the supplied text. Staff estimates that 2,500 business opportunity sellers complete and disseminate 100 cover sheets per year at a cost of approximately $0.55 per cover sheet, or a total cost of approximately $137,500 (2,500 business opportunity sellers x 100 cover sheets per year x $0.55 per cover sheet). Accordingly, the cumulative nonlabor cost incurred by business opportunity sellers each year attributable to compliance will be approximately $3,887,500 ($3,750,000 for printing and mailing documents + $137,500 for completing and mailing cover sheets). William Blumenthal, General Counsel. [FR Doc. E8–15143 Filed 7–3–08: 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6750–01–S FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION [File No. 071 0203] Carlyle Partners IV, L.P.; Analysis of Agreement Containing Consent Order to Aid Public Comment Federal Trade Commission. Proposed Consent Agreement. AGENCY: ACTION: SUMMARY: The consent agreement in this matter settles alleged violations of federal law prohibiting unfair or deceptive acts or practices or unfair methods of competition. The attached Analysis to Aid Public Comment describes both the allegations in the draft complaint and the terms of the consent order — embodied in the consent agreement — that would settle these allegations. PO 00000 Frm 00065 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 38453 Comments must be received on or before July 29, 2008. ADDRESSES: Interested parties are invited to submit written comments. Comments should refer to ‘‘Carlyle Partners, File No. 071 0203,’’ to facilitate the organization of comments. A comment filed in paper form should include this reference both in the text and on the envelope, and should be mailed or delivered to the following address: Federal Trade Commission/ Office of the Secretary, Room 135-H, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20580. Comments containing confidential material must be filed in paper form, must be clearly labeled ‘‘Confidential,’’ and must comply with Commission Rule 4.9(c). 16 CFR 4.9(c) (2005).1 The FTC is requesting that any comment filed in paper form be sent by courier or overnight service, if possible, because U.S. postal mail in the Washington area and at the Commission is subject to delay due to heightened security precautions. Comments that do not contain any nonpublic information may instead be filed in electronic form by following the instructions on the webbased form at (https:// secure.commentworks.com/ftcCarlylePartners). To ensure that the Commission considers an electronic comment, you must file it on that webbased form. The FTC Act and other laws the Commission administers permit the collection of public comments to consider and use in this proceeding as appropriate. All timely and responsive public comments, whether filed in paper or electronic form, will be considered by the Commission, and will be available to the public on the FTC website, to the extent practicable, at www.ftc.gov. As a matter of discretion, the FTC makes every effort to remove home contact information for individuals from the public comments it receives before placing those comments on the FTC website. More information, including routine uses permitted by the Privacy Act, may be found in the FTC’s privacy policy, at (https://www.ftc.gov/ ftc/privacy.htm). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Catherine M. Moscatelli, FTC Bureau of Competition, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, DATES: 1 The comment must be accompanied by an explicit request for confidential treatment, including the factual and legal basis for the request, and must identify the specific portions of the comment to be withheld from the public record. The request will be granted or denied by the Commission’s General Counsel, consistent with applicable law and the public interest. See Commission Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c). E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM 07JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 130 (Monday, July 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38451-38453]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-15143]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION


Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; 
Comment Request; Extension

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission (``Commission'' or ``FTC'').

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The information collection requirements described below will 
be submitted to the Office of Management

[[Page 38452]]

and Budget (``OMB'') for review, as required by the Paperwork Reduction 
Act (``PRA''). The FTC is seeking public comments on its proposal to 
extend through October 31, 2011, the current PRA clearance for 
information collection requirements contained in the Commission's 
Business Opportunity Rule (``Rule''). The current clearance expires on 
October 31, 2008.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before September 5, 2008.

ADDRESSES: Interested parties are invited to submit written comments. 
Comments should refer to ``16 CFR Part 437: Paperwork Comment, FTC File 
No. R511993'' to facilitate the organization of comments. A comment 
filed in paper form should include this reference both in the text and 
on the envelope and should be mailed or delivered to the following 
address: Federal Trade Commission, Room H-135 (Annex J), 600 
Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580. The Commission is 
requesting that any comment filed in paper form be sent by courier or 
overnight service, if possible because U.S. postal mail in the 
Washington area and at the FTC is subject to delay due to heightened 
security precautions. Moreover, because paper mail in the Washington 
area and at the FTC is subject to delay, please consider submitting 
your comments in electronic form, as prescribed below. If, however, the 
comment contains any material for which confidential treatment is 
requested, it must be filed in paper form, and the first page of the 
document must be clearly labeled ``Confidential.''\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Commission Rule 4.2(d), 16 CFR 4.2(d). The comment must be 
accompanied by an explicit request for confidential treatment, 
including the factual and legal basis for the request, and must 
identify the specific portions of the comment to be withheld from 
the public record. The request will be granted or denied by the 
Commission's General Counsel, consistent with applicable law and the 
public interest. See Commission Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Comments filed in electronic form should be submitted by following 
the instructions on the web-based form at (https://
secure.commentworks.com/ftc-bizopPRA) and following the instructions on 
the web-based form. To ensure that the Commission considers an 
electronic comment, you must file it on the web-based form at: (https:/
/secure.commentworks.com/ftc-bizopPRA). If this notice appears at 
www.regulations.gov, you may also file an electronic comment through 
that website. The Commission will consider all comments that 
www.regulations.gov forwards to it.
    The FTC Act and other laws the Commission administers permit the 
collection of public comments to consider and use in this proceeding as 
appropriate. All timely and responsive public comments will be 
considered by the Commission and will be available to the public on the 
FTC website, to the extent practicable, at www.ftc.gov. As a matter of 
discretion, the FTC makes every effort to remove home contact 
information for individuals from the public comments it receives before 
placing those comments on the FTC website. More information, including 
routine uses permitted by the Privacy Act, may be found in the FTC's 
privacy policy at (https://www.ftc.gov/ftc/privacy.shtm).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Monica Vaca, Attorney, Division of 
Marketing Practices, Bureau of Consumer Protection, (202) 326-2245, 
Federal Trade Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington 
D.C. 20580.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3501-3521, federal 
agencies must obtain approval from OMB for each collection of 
information they conduct or sponsor. ``Collection of information'' 
means agency requests or requirements that members of the public submit 
reports, keep records, or provide information to a third party. 44 
U.S.C. 3502(3), 5 CFR 1320.3(c). As required by section 3506(c)(2)(A) 
of the PRA, the FTC is providing this opportunity for public comment 
before requesting that OMB extend the existing paperwork clearance for 
the Business Opportunity Rule, 16 CFR Part 437 (OMB Control Number 
3084-0142).
    The FTC invites comments on: (1) whether the proposed collection of 
information required by the Rule is necessary for the proper 
performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the 
information will have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of the 
agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of 
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions 
used; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the 
collection of information on those who are to respond, including 
through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or 
other technological collection techniques or other forms of information 
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses.
    The Rule is designed to ensure that prospective purchasers of a 
business opportunity receive information that will help them evaluate 
the opportunity that is presented to them. Part 437 was promulgated in 
March of 2007, concurrently with the amendment of the Franchise Rule, 
Part 436. Part 437 mirrors the requirements and prohibitions of the 
original Franchise Rule, and imposes no additional disclosure or 
recordkeeping obligations or prohibitions.\2\ The Rule requires 
business opportunity sellers to furnish to prospective purchasers a 
disclosure document that provides information relating to the seller, 
the seller's business, the nature of the proposed business opportunity, 
as well as additional information regarding any claims about actual or 
potential sales, income, or profits for a prospective business 
opportunity purchaser. The seller must also preserve information that 
forms a reasonable basis for such claims. These requirements are 
subject to the PRA. The FTC is seeking to extend the current PRA 
clearance to October 31, 2011.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ In March of 2008, the Commission published the Business 
Opportunity Rule Revised Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 73 FR 16110 
(March 26, 2008) (``Notice''). The Notice proposed amending the 
Business Opportunity Rule substantially, and would, among other 
things, reduce the number of required disclosures by sellers of 
business opportunities to prospective purchasers. Conversely, the 
Notice proposed amending the rule to expand the coverage of entities 
required to make disclosures to include a broader array of business 
opportunities than those covered by the original Franchise Rule. For 
now, however, only those businesses opportunities covered by the 
original Franchise Rule -- such as vending machine and rack display 
opportunities -- remain covered under part 437.
    \3\ The current clearance under recently assigned OMB Control 
Number 3084-0142 covers the terms of the original Franchise Rule as 
applied to business opportunity sellers. The portion of clearance 
applicable to franchisors under Part 436 is separately assigned to 
pre-existing OMB Control Number 3084-0107.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Estimated annual hours burden: 16,750 hours

    Based on a review of trade publications and information from state 
regulatory authorities, staff believes that, on average, from year to 
year, there are approximately 2,500 business opportunity sellers, with 
perhaps about 10% of that total reflecting an equal amount of new and 
departing business entrants.
    The burden estimates for compliance will vary depending on the 
particular business opportunity seller's prior experience with the 
original Franchise Rule. Staff estimates that 250 or so new business 
opportunity sellers will enter the market each year, requiring 
approximately 30 hours each to develop a Rule-compliant disclosure 
document. Thus, staff estimates that the cumulative

[[Page 38453]]

annual disclosure burden for new business opportunity sellers will be 
approximately 7,500 hours. Staff further estimates that the remaining 
2,250 established business opportunity sellers will require no more 
than approximately 3 hours each to update their disclosure document. 
Accordingly, staff estimates that the cumulative annual disclosure 
burden for established business opportunity sellers will be 
approximately 6,750 hours.
    Business opportunity sellers may need to maintain additional 
documentation for the sale of business opportunities in states not 
currently requiring these records as part of their regulation of 
business opportunity sellers. This could take up to an additional hour 
of recordkeeping per year. Accordingly, staff estimates that business 
opportunity sellers will cumulatively incur approximately 2,500 hours 
of recordkeeping burden each year (2,500 business opportunity sellers x 
1 hour).
    Thus, the total burden for business opportunity sellers is 
approximately 16,750 hours (7,500 hours of disclosure burden for new 
business opportunity sellers + 6,750 hours of disclosure burden for 
established business opportunity sellers + 2,500 of recordkeeping 
burden for all business opportunity sellers).

Estimated annual labor cost: $3,595,000

    Labor costs are determined by applying applicable wage rates to 
associated burden hours. Staff presumes an attorney will prepare or 
update the disclosure document at an estimated $250 per hour. As 
applied, this would yield approximately $3,562,500 in labor costs 
attributable to compliance with the Rule's disclosure requirements 
((250 new business opportunity sellers x $250 per hour x 30 hours per 
seller) + (2,250 established business opportunity sellers x $250 per 
hour x 3 hours per seller)).
    Staff anticipates that recordkeeping would be performed by clerical 
staff at approximately $13 per hour. At 2,500 hours per year for all 
affected business opportunity sellers (see above), this would amount to 
a total cost of $32,500. Thus, the combined labor costs for 
recordkeeping and disclosure for business opportunity sellers is 
approximately $3,595,000.

Estimated non-labor cost: $3,887,500

    Business opportunity sellers must also incur costs to print and 
distribute the disclosure document. These costs vary based upon the 
length of the disclosures and the number of copies produced to meet the 
expected demand. Staff estimates that 2,500 business opportunity 
sellers print and mail 100 documents per year at a cost of $15 per 
document, for a total cost of $3,750,000 (2,500 business opportunity 
sellers x 100 documents per year x $15 per document).
    Business opportunity sellers must also complete and disseminate an 
FTC-required cover sheet that identifies the business opportunity 
seller, the date the document is issued, a table of contents, and a 
notice that tracks the language specifically provided in the Rule. 
Although some of the language in the cover sheet is supplied by the 
government for the purpose of disclosure to the public, and is thus 
excluded from the definition of ``collection of information'' under the 
PRA, see 5 CFR 1320.3(c)(2), there are residual costs to print and mail 
these cover sheets, including within them the presentation of related 
information beyond the supplied text. Staff estimates that 2,500 
business opportunity sellers complete and disseminate 100 cover sheets 
per year at a cost of approximately $0.55 per cover sheet, or a total 
cost of approximately $137,500 (2,500 business opportunity sellers x 
100 cover sheets per year x $0.55 per cover sheet).
    Accordingly, the cumulative non-labor cost incurred by business 
opportunity sellers each year attributable to compliance will be 
approximately $3,887,500 ($3,750,000 for printing and mailing documents 
+ $137,500 for completing and mailing cover sheets).

William Blumenthal,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. E8-15143 Filed 7-3-08: 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-S
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.