Small Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities; Harbor Activities Related to the Delta IV/Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle at Vandenberg Air Force Base, CA, 38176-38180 [E8-15154]
Download as PDF
38176
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 129 / Thursday, July 3, 2008 / Notices
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XI42
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Small Takes of Marine Mammals
Incidental to Specified Activities;
Harbor Activities Related to the Delta
IV/Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle
at Vandenberg Air Force Base, CA
Jeannine Cody or Candace Nachman,
Office of Protected Resources, NMFS,
(301) 713–2289, or Monica DeAngelis,
NMFS Southwest Region, (562) 980–
3232.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the
MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct
the Secretary of Commerce to allow,
upon request, the incidental, but not
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
intentional taking of small numbers of
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
marine mammals by United States
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
citizens who engage in a specified
Commerce.
activity (other than commercial fishing)
ACTION: Notice; proposed incidental
within a specified geographical region if
harassment authorization; request for
certain findings are made and either
comments.
regulations are issued or, if the taking is
limited to harassment, a notice of a
SUMMARY: NMFS received a request from
proposed authorization is provided to
United Launch Alliance (ULA) for a
the public for review.
one-year authorization to take small
Authorization for incidental takings
numbers of marine mammals by
shall be granted if NMFS finds that the
harassment incidental to Delta Mariner
taking will have a negligible impact on
operations, cargo unloading activities,
the species or stock(s), and will not have
harbor maintenance dredging, and kelp
an unmitigable adverse impact on the
habitat mitigation activities related to
availability of the species or stock(s) for
the Delta IV/Evolved Expendable
certain subsistence uses, and if the
Launch Vehicle (EELV) at south
permissible methods of taking and
Vandenberg Air Force Base, CA (VAFB).
requirements pertaining to the
Pursuant to the Marine Mammal
mitigation, monitoring, and reporting of
Protection Act (MMPA), NMFS requests
such taking are set forth.
comments on its proposal to authorize
NMFS has defined ‘‘negligible
ULA to take, by Level B harassment,
impact’’ in 50 CFR 216.103 as:
small numbers of several species of
’’...an impact resulting from the specified
pinnipeds at south VAFB beginning
activity that cannot be reasonably expected
August 2008.
to, and is not reasonably likely to, adversely
DATES: Comments and information must affect the species or stock through effects on
annual rates of recruitment or survival.’’
be received no later than August 4,
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA
2008.
established an expedited process by
ADDRESSES: Comments on the
which citizens of the United States can
application should be addressed to P.
apply for an authorization to
Michael Payne, Chief, Permits,
incidentally take small numbers of
Conservation and Education Division,
marine mammals by harassment. Except
Office of Protected Resources, National
for certain categories of activities not
Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 Eastpertinent here, the MMPA defines
West Highway, Silver Spring, MD
‘‘harassment’’ as:
20910–3225. The mailbox address for
any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance
which (i) has the potential to injure a marine
providing email comments is
mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild
PR1.0648XI42@noaa.gov. Comments
[‘‘Level A harassment’’]; or (ii) has the
sent via e-mail, including all
potential to disturb a marine mammal or
attachments, must not exceed a 10–
marine mammal stock in the wild by causing
megabyte file size.
disruption of behavioral patterns, including,
A copy of the application containing
but not limited to, migration, breathing,
a list of the references used in this
nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering
document may be obtained by writing to [‘‘Level B harassment’’].
the address specified above, telephoning
Section 101(a)(5)(D) establishes a 45–
the contact listed below (see FOR
day time limit for NMFS’ review of an
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT), or
application followed by a 30–day public
visiting the internet at: https://
notice and comment period on any
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/
proposed authorizations for the
incidental.htm.
incidental harassment of small numbers
Documents cited in this notice may be of marine mammals. Within 45 days of
viewed, by appointment, during regular the close of the comment period, NMFS
must either issue or deny the
business hours, at the aforementioned
authorization.
address.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:46 Jul 02, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Summary of Request
On February 18, 2008, NMFS received
an application from ULA requesting an
authorization for the harassment of
small numbers of Pacific harbor seals
(Phoca vitulina richardsi) and California
sea lions (Zalophus californianus)
incidental to harbor activities related to
the Delta IV/EELV, including: transport
vessel operations, cargo movement
activities, harbor maintenance dredging,
and kelp habitat mitigation operations.
In addition, northern elephant seals
(Mirounga angustirostris) may also be
incidentally harassed but in even
smaller numbers. Incidental Harassment
Authorizations (IHAs) were issued to
The Boeing Company, now ULA, on
May 15, 2002 (67 FR 36151, May 23,
2002), May 20, 2003 (68 FR 36540, June
18, 2003), May 20, 2004 (69 FR 29696,
May 25, 2004), May 23, 2005 (70 FR
30697, May 27, 2005), June 20, 2006 (71
FR 36321, June 26, 2006), and June 21,
2007 (72 FR 34444, June 22, 2007) each
for a 1–year period. No work and,
therefore, no monitoring was conducted
under the 2007 IHA. The harbor where
activities will take place is on south
VAFB approximately 2.5 mi (4.02 km)
south of Point Arguello, CA and
approximately 1 mi (1.61 km) north of
the nearest marine mammal pupping
site (i.e., Rocky Point).
Specified Activities
Delta Mariner off-loading operations
and associated cargo movements will
occur a maximum of 3 times per year.
The Delta Mariner is a 312–ft (95.1–m)
long, 84–ft (25.6–m) wide steel hull
ocean-going vessel capable of operating
at an 8–ft (2.4–m) draft. For the first few
visits to the south VAFB harbor, tug
boats will accompany the Delta Mariner.
Sources of noise from the Delta Mariner
include ventilating propellers used for
maneuvering into position and the cargo
bay door when it becomes disengaged.
Removal of the common booster core
(CBC) from the vessel requires use of an
elevating platform transporter (EPT), an
additional source of noise with sound
levels measured at approximately 85
decibels (dB) A-weighted (re 20
microPascals at 1–m) 20 ft (6.1 m) from
the engine exhaust when the engine is
running mid-speed (Acentech, 1998).
Procedures require two short
(approximately 1/3 second) beeps of the
horn prior to starting the ignition. The
sound level of the EPT horn ranged from
62–70 dB A-weighted at 200 ft (60.9 m)
away, and 84–112 dB A-weighted at 25
ft (7.6 m) away. Containers containing
flight hardware items will be towed off
the Delta Mariner by a tractor tug that
generates a sound level of
E:\FR\FM\03JYN1.SGM
03JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 129 / Thursday, July 3, 2008 / Notices
approximately 87 dB A-weighted at 50
ft (15.2 m) while in operational mode.
Total docking and cargo movement
activities is estimated to be
approximately 14 to 18 hours in good
weather.
To accommodate the Delta Mariner,
the harbor will need to be dredged,
removing up to 5,000 cubic yards of
sediment per dredging. Dredging will
involve the use of heavy equipment,
including a clamshell dredge, dredging
crane, a small tug, dredging barge, dump
trucks, and a skip loader. Measured
sound levels from this equipment are
roughly equivalent to those estimated
for the wharf modification equipment:
43–81 dB A-weighted at 250 ft (76.2 m).
Dredge operations, from set-up to teardown, would continue 24–hr a day for
3 to 5 weeks. Sedimentation surveys
have shown that initial dredging
indicates that maintenance dredging
should be required annually or twice
per year, depending on the hardware
delivery schedule.
A more detailed description of the
work proposed for 2008 is contained in
the application which is available upon
request (see ADDRESSES) and in the Final
U.S. Air Force Environmental
Assessment for Harbor Activities
Associated with the Delta IV Program at
Vandenberg Air Force Base (ENSR
International, 2001).
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Marine Mammals Affected by the
Activity
Pacific Harbor Seals
The marine mammal species likely to
be harassed incidental to harbor
activities at south VAFB are the Pacific
harbor seal and the California sea lion.
The most recent estimate of the Pacific
harbor seal population in California is
31,600 seals. Since 1990 there has been
no net population growth along the
mainland or the Channel Islands. The
decrease in population growth rate has
occurred at the same time as a decrease
in human-caused mortality and may
indicate that the population has reached
its environmental carrying capacity
(Carretta et al., 2007). The total
population of harbor seals on VAFB is
now estimated to be 1,099 (maximum of
515 seals hauled out at one time on
south VAFB) based on sighting surveys
and telemetry data (SRS Technologies,
2003).
The daily haul-out behavior of harbor
seals along the south VAFB coastline is
primarily dependent on time of day.
The highest number of seals haul-out at
south VAFB between 1100 through 1600
hours. In addition, haul-out behavior at
all sites seems to be influenced by
environmental factors such as high
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:46 Jul 02, 2008
Jkt 214001
swell, tide height, and wind. The
combination of all three may prevent
seals from hauling out at most sites. The
number of seals hauled out at a site can
vary greatly from day to day based on
environmental conditions. Harbor seals
occasionally haul out at a beach 250 ft
(76.2 m) west of the south VAFB harbor
and on rocks outside the harbor
breakwater where ULA will be
conducting Delta Mariner operations,
cargo loading, dredging activities, and
reef enhancement. The maximum
number of seals present during the 2001
dredging of the harbor was 23 (averaging
7 per observation period), and the
maximum number hauled out during
the 2002 wharf modification activities
was 43, averaging 21 per day when tidal
conditions were favorable for hauling
out. Dredging and reef enhancement did
not occur from 2003–2007. The harbor
seal pupping site closest to south VAFB
harbor is Rocky Point, approximately 1
mi (1.61 km) north of the harbor.
However, harbor seals have been
reported to haul-out on the coast at
Sudden Ranch, approximately 0.5 mi
(0.8 km) south of the harbor.
Several factors affect the seasonal
haul-out behavior of harbor seals
including environmental conditions,
reproduction, and molting. Harbor seal
numbers at VAFB begin to increase in
March during the pupping season
(March to June) as females spend more
time on shore nursing pups. The
number of hauled-out seals is at its
highest during the molt, which occurs
from May through July. During the
molting season, tagged harbor seals at
VAFB increased their time spent on
shore by 22.4 percent; however, all seals
continued to make daily trips to sea to
forage. Molting harbor seals entering the
water because of a disturbance are not
adversely affected in their ability to
molt and do not endure
thermoregulatory stress. During pupping
and molting season, harbor seals at the
south VAFB sites expand into haul-out
areas that are not used the rest of the
year. The number of seals hauled out
begins to decrease in August after the
molt is complete and reaches the lowest
number in late fall and early winter.
California Sea Lions
During the wharf modification
activity in June-July 2002, California sea
lions were observed hauling out on the
breakwater in small numbers (up to 6
individuals). Although this is
considered to be an unusual occurrence
and is possibly related to fish schooling
in the area, ULA included sea lions in
the request.
California sea lions range from British
Columbia to Mexico. The most recent
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
38177
population estimates for the California
sea lions range from 237,000 to 244,000
individuals (Caretta et al., 2007).
Between 1975 and 2001, the population
growth rate was 5.4–6.1 percent. A
1985–1987 population survey indicated
that most individuals on the Northern
Channel Islands were on San Miguel
Island (SMI), with the population
ranging from 2,235 to over 17,000. The
largest numbers of California sea lions
in the VAFB vicinity occur at Lion
Rock, 0.4 mi (0.64 km) southeast of
Point Sal. This area is approximately 1.5
mi (2.41 km) north of the VAFB
boundary. At least 100 sea lions can be
observed during any season at this site.
The Point Arguello beaches and the
rocky ledges of South Rocky Point on
south VAFB are haulout areas that may
be used by California sea lions. In 2003,
at least 145 sea lions were observed at
Rocky Point, including five pups that
did not survive due to abandonment
shortly after birth. This was thought to
be an El Nino effect, as there had never
been any previously reported sea lion
births at VAFB (Thorson, 2003).
Each year, small groups of sea lions
have been observed heading south along
the VAFB coastline in April and May
(Tetra Tech, 1997). Starting in August,
large groups of sea lions can be seen
moving north, in groups varying in size
from 25 to more than 300 (Roest, 1995).
This concurs with established migration
patterns (Reeves et al., 1992; Roest,
1995). Juvenile sea lions can be
observed hauled-out with harbor seals
along the South Base sites from July
through September (Tetra Tech, 1997).
Starving and exhausted sub-adult sea
lions are fairly common on central
California beaches during the months of
July and August (Roest, 1995).
During the breeding season, most
California sea lions inhabit southern
California and Mexico. Rookery sites in
southern California are limited to SMI
and the southerly Channel Islands of
San Nicolas, Santa Barbara, and San
Clemente. Breeding season begins in
mid-May, occurring within 10 days of
arrival at the rookeries. Molting occurs
gradually over several months in the
late summer and fall. Because the molt
is not catastrophic, the sea lions can
enter the water to feed.
Male California sea lions migrate
annually. In the spring they migrate
southward to breeding rookeries in the
Channel Islands and Mexico, then
migrate northward in the late summer
following breeding season. Females
appear to remain near the breeding
rookeries. The greatest population on
land occurs in September and October
during the post-breeding dispersal,
although many of the sea lions,
E:\FR\FM\03JYN1.SGM
03JYN1
38178
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 129 / Thursday, July 3, 2008 / Notices
particularly juveniles and sub-adult and
adult males, may move north away from
the Channel Islands.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Other Marine Mammals
Other marine mammal species are
rare to infrequent along the south VAFB
coast during certain times of the year
and are unlikely to be harassed by
ULA’s activities. These four species are:
the northern elephant seal, the northern
fur seal (Callorhinus ursinus),
Guadalupe fur seal (Arctocephalus
townsendi), and Steller sea lion
(Eumetopias jubatus). Northern
elephant seals may occur on VAFB but
do not haul out in the harbor area.
Northern fur seals, Guadalupe fur seals,
and Steller sea lions occur along the
California coast and Northern Channel
Islands but are not likely to be found on
VAFB. Descriptions of the biology and
distribution of these species can be
found in the NMFS Stock Assessment
Reports at https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
pr/sars/, as well as other sources such
as Stewart and Yochem (1994, 1984),
Forney et al. (2000), Koski et al. (1998),
Barlow et al. (1993), Stewart and
DeLong (1995), and Lowry et al. (1992).
Please refer to those documents for
information on these species.
Potential Effects of Activities on Marine
Mammals
Acoustic and visual stimuli generated
by the use of heavy equipment during
the Delta Mariner off-loading
operations, dredging, and kelp habitat
mitigation and the increased presence of
personnel, may cause short-term
disturbance to harbor seals and
California sea lions hauled out on the
beach and rocks near south VAFB
harbor. This disturbance from acoustic
and visual stimuli is the principal
means of marine mammal taking
associated with these activities.
Based on the measured sounds of
construction equipment, such as might
be used during ULA’s activities, sound
level intensity decreases proportional to
the square root of the distance from the
source. A dredging crane at the end of
the dock producing 88 dBA of noise
would be approximately 72 dBA at the
nearest beach or the end of the
breakwater, roughly 250 ft (76.2 m)
away. The EPT produces approximately
85 dBA, measured less than 20 ft (6 m)
from the engine exhaust, when the
engine is running at mid speed. The
EPT operation procedure requires two
short beeps of the horn (approximately
1/3 of a second each) prior to starting
the ignition. Sound level measurements
for the horn ranged from 84–112 dBA at
25 ft (7.6 m) away and 62–70 dBA at 200
ft (61 m) away. The highest
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:46 Jul 02, 2008
Jkt 214001
measurement was taken from the side of
the vehicle where the horn is mounted.
Ambient background noise measured
approximately 250 ft (76.2 m) from the
beach was estimated to be 35–48 dBA
(Acentech, 1998; EPA, 1971).
Pinnipeds sometimes show startle
reactions when exposed to sudden brief
sounds. An acoustic stimulus with
sudden onset (such as a sonic boom)
may be analogous to a ‘‘looming’’ visual
stimulus (Hayes and Saif, 1967), which
may elicit flight away from the source
(Berrens et al., 1988). The onset of
operations by a loud sound source, such
as the EPT during CBC off-loading
procedures, may elicit such a reaction.
In addition, the movements of cranes
and dredges may represent a ‘‘looming’’
visual stimulus to seals hauled out in
close proximity. Seals and sea lions
exposed to such acoustic and visual
stimuli may either exhibit a startle
response and/or leave the haul-out site.
According to the MMPA and NMFS
implementing regulations, if harbor
activities disrupt the behavioral patterns
of harbor seals or sea lions, these
activities would take marine mammals
by Level B harassment. In general, if the
received level of the noise stimulus
exceeds both the background (ambient)
noise level and the auditory threshold of
the animals, and especially if the
stimulus is novel to them, there may be
a behavioral response. The probability
and degree of response will also depend
on the season, the group composition of
the pinnipeds, and the type of activity
in which they are engaged. Minor and
brief responses, such as short-duration
startle or alert reactions, are not likely
to constitute disruption of behavioral
patterns, such as migration, nursing,
breeding, feeding, or sheltering (i.e.,
Level B harassment) and would not
cause injury or mortality to marine
mammals.
On the other hand, startle and alert
reactions accompanied by large-scale
movements, such as stampedes into the
water of hundreds of animals, may rise
to the degree of Level A harassment and
could result in injury of individuals. In
addition, such large-scale movements by
dense aggregations of marine mammals
or at pupping sites could potentially
lead to takes by injury or death.
However, there is no potential for largescale movements leading to serious
injury or mortality near the south VAFB
harbor because on average the number
of harbor seals hauled out near the site
is less than 30 individuals, and there is
no pupping at nearby sites. The effects
of the harbor activities are expected to
be limited to short-term startle
responses and localized behavioral
changes.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
According to the June 2002 dock
modification construction report
(ENSRI, 2002), the maximum number of
harbor seals hauled out each day ranged
from 23 to 25 animals. There were 15
occasions in which construction noise,
vehicle noise, or noise from a fishing
boat caused the seals to lift their heads.
Flushing only occurred due to fishing
activities, which were unrelated to the
construction activities. The sea lions
were less reactive to the construction
noise than the harbor seals. None of the
construction activities caused any of the
sea lions to leave the jetty rocks, and
there was only one incident of a head
alert reaction.
The report from the December 2002
dredging activities show that the
number of Pacific harbor seals ranged
from 0 to 19, and that California sea
lions did not haul out during the
monitoring period. On 10 occasions,
harbor seals showed head alerts,
although two of the alerts were for
disturbances that were not related to the
project. No harbor seals flushed during
the activities on the dock.
For a further discussion of the
anticipated effects of the planned
activities on harbor seals in the area,
please refer to the application, NMFS
2005 Environmental Assessment (EA),
and ENSR International’s 2001 Final
EA.
Numbers of Marine Mammals Expected
to be Harassed
ULA estimates that a maximum of 43
harbor seals per day may be hauled out
near the south VAFB harbor, with a
daily average of 21 seals sighted when
tidal conditions were favorable during
previous dredging operations in the
harbor. Considering the maximum and
average number of seals hauled out per
day, assuming that the seals may be
seen twice a day, and using a maximum
total of 73 operating days in 2008–2009,
NMFS estimates that a maximum of 767
to 1,570 Pacific harbor seals may be
subject to Level B harassment out of a
total estimated population of 31,600.
These numbers are small relative to this
population size (2.4–5 percent).
During wharf modification activities,
a maximum of six California sea lions
were seen hauling out in a single day.
Based on the above-mentioned
calculation, NMFS believes that a
maximum of 219 California sea lions
may be subject to Level B harassment
out of a total estimated population of
240,000. These numbers are small
relative to this population size (less than
0.1 percent). Up to 10 northern elephant
seals (because they may be in nearby
waters) may be subject to Level B
harassment out of a total estimated
E:\FR\FM\03JYN1.SGM
03JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 129 / Thursday, July 3, 2008 / Notices
population of 101,000. These numbers
are small relative to this population size
(less than 0.01 percent).
Possible Effects of Activities on Marine
Mammal Habitat
ULA does not anticipate any loss or
modification to the habitat used by
Pacific harbor seals or California sea
lions that haul out near the south VAFB
harbor. The harbor seal and sea lion
haul-out sites near south VAFB harbor
are not used as breeding, molting, or
mating sites; therefore, it is not expected
that the activities in the harbor will
have any impact on the ability of Pacific
harbor seals or California sea lions in
the area to reproduce.
ULA anticipates unavoidable kelp
removal during dredging. This habitat
modification will not affect the marine
mammal habitat. However, ULA will
mitigate for the removal of kelp habitat
by placing 150 tons of rocky substrate in
a sandy area between the breakwater
and the mooring dolphins to enhance an
existing artificial reef. This type of
mitigation was implemented by the
Army Corps of Engineers following the
1984 and 1989 dredging. A lush kelp
bed adjacent to the sandy area has
developed from the efforts. The
substrate will consist of approximately
150 sharp-faced boulders, each with a
diameter of about 2 ft (0.61 m) and each
weighing about 1 ton (907 kg). The
boulders will be brought in by truck
from an off-site quarry and loaded by
crane onto a small barge at the wharf.
The barge is towed by a tugboat to a
location along the mooring dolphins
from which a small barge-mounted
crane can place them into the sandy
area. ULA plans to perform the reef
enhancement in conjunction with the
next maintenance dredging event in
order to minimize cost and disturbances
to animals. Noise will be generated by
the trucks delivering the boulders to the
harbor and during the operation of
unloading the boulders onto the barges
and into the water.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Proposed Mitigation Measures
To reduce the potential for
disturbance from visual and acoustic
stimuli associated with the activities,
ULA proposes to undertake the
following marine mammal mitigating
measures:
(1) If activities occur during nighttime
hours, lighting will be turned on before
dusk and left on the entire night to
avoid startling pinnipeds at night.
(2) Activities will be initiated before
dusk.
(3) Construction noises must be kept
constant (i.e., not interrupted by periods
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:46 Jul 02, 2008
Jkt 214001
of quiet in excess of 30 minutes) while
pinnipeds are present.
(4) If activities cease for longer than
30 minutes and pinnipeds are in the
area, start-up of activities will include a
gradual increase in noise levels.
(5) A NMFS-approved marine
mammal observer will visually monitor
the harbor seals on the beach adjacent
to the harbor and on rocks for any
flushing or other behaviors as a result of
ULA’s activities (see Monitoring).
(6) The Delta Mariner and
accompanying vessels will enter the
harbor only when the tide is too high for
harbor seals to haul-out on the rocks,
and the vessel will reduce speed to 1.5
to 2 knots (1.5–2.0 nm/hr; 2.8–3.7 km/
hr) once the vessel is within 3 mi (4.83
km) of the harbor. The vessel will enter
the harbor stern first, approaching the
wharf and mooring dolphins at less than
0.75 knot (1.4 km/hr).
(7) As alternate dredge methods are
explored, the dredge contractor may
introduce quieter techniques and
equipment.
Proposed Monitoring Measures
As part of its 2002 application,
Boeing, now ULA, provided a proposed
monitoring plan for assessing impacts to
harbor seals from the activities at south
VAFB harbor and for determining when
mitigation measures should be
employed. NMFS proposes the same
plan for this IHA.
A NMFS-approved and VAFBdesignated biologically trained observer
will monitor the area for pinnipeds
during all harbor activities. During
nighttime activities, the harbor area will
be illuminated, and the monitor will use
a night vision scope. Monitoring
activities will consist of:
(1) Conducting baseline observation of
pinnipeds in the project area prior to
initiating project activities.
(2) Conducting and recording
observations on pinnipeds in the
vicinity of the harbor for the duration of
the activity occurring when tides are
low enough for pinnipeds to haul out
(2 ft, 0.61 m, or less).
(3) Conducting post-construction
observations of pinniped haul-outs in
the project area to determine whether
animals disturbed by the project
activities return to the haul-out.
Monitoring results from previous
years of these activities have been
reviewed and incorporated into the
analysis of potential effects in this
document, as well as the take estimates.
Reporting
ULA will notify NMFS 2 weeks prior
to initiation of each activity. After each
activity is completed, ULA will provide
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
38179
a report to NMFS within 90 days. This
report will provide dates, times,
durations, and locations of specific
activities, details of pinniped behavioral
observations, and estimates of numbers
of affected pinnipeds and impacts
(behavioral or other). In addition, the
report will include information on the
weather, tidal state, horizontal visibility,
and composition (species, gender, and
age class) and locations of haul-out
group(s). In the unanticipated event that
any cases of pinniped injury or
mortality are judged to result from these
activities, this will be reported to NMFS
immediately.
Endangered Species Act (ESA)
This action will not affect species
listed under the ESA that are under
NMFS’ jurisdiction. VAFB formally
consulted with the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service in 1998 on the possible
take of southern sea otters during
Boeing’s, now ULA, harbor activities at
south VAFB. A Biological Opinion was
issued in August 2001, which
concluded that the EELV Program is not
likely to jeopardize the continued
existence of the southern sea otter, and
no injury or mortality is expected. The
activities covered by this IHA are
analyzed in that Biological Opinion, and
this IHA does not modify the action in
a manner that was not previously
analyzed.
National Environmental Policy Act
In 2001, the United States Air Force
(USAF) prepared an EA for Harbor
Activities Associated with the Delta IV
Program at VAFB. In 2005, NMFS
prepared an EA supplementing the
information contained in the USAF EA
and issued a Finding of No Significant
Impact on the issuance of an IHA for
Boeing’s, now ULA, harbor activities in
accordance with section 6.01 of the
NOAA Administrative Order 216–6
(Environmental Review Procedures for
Implementing the National
Environmental Policy Act, May 20,
1999). ULA’s proposed activities and
impacts for 2007–2008 are expected to
be within the scope of NMFS’ 2005 EA
and FONSI.
Preliminary Conclusions
NMFS proposes to issue an IHA to
ULA for harbor activities related to the
Delta IV/EELV to take place at south
VAFB over a 1–year period. Issuance of
this IHA would be contingent upon
adherence to the proposed mitigation,
monitoring, and reporting requirements
described in this FR notice. NMFS has
preliminarily determined that the
impact of harbor activities related to the
Delta IV/EELV at VAFB, including:
E:\FR\FM\03JYN1.SGM
03JYN1
38180
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 129 / Thursday, July 3, 2008 / Notices
transport vessel operations, cargo
movement activities, harbor
maintenance dredging, and kelp habitat
mitigation, would result in Level B
harassment only of small numbers of
Pacific harbor seals, California sea lions,
and northern elephant seals; and would
have a negligible impact on the affected
species. The provision requiring that the
activity not have an unmitigable adverse
impact on the availability of the affected
species or stock for subsistence uses
does not apply for this proposed action.
Northern fur seals, Guadalupe fur seals,
and Steller sea lions are unlikely to be
found in the area and, therefore, will not
be affected. No rookeries, mating
grounds, areas of concentrated feeding,
or other areas of special significance for
marine mammals occur within or near
south VAFB harbor.
Proposed Authorization
As a result of these preliminary
determinations, NMFS proposes to issue
an IHA to ULA for the Delta IV EELV
Program, provided that the previously
mentioned mitigation, monitoring, and
reporting requirements are incorporated.
Dated: June 27, 2008.
James H. Lecky,
Director, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E8–15154 Filed 7–2–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XI68
Taking of Marine Mammals Incidental
to Specified Activities; Construction of
the East Span of the San FranciscoOakland Bay Bridge
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; proposed incidental take
authorization; request for comments.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS has received a request
from the California Department of
Transportation (CALTRANS) for
renewal of an authorization to take
small numbers of California sea lions,
Pacific harbor seals, harbor porpoises,
and gray whales, by harassment,
incidental to construction of a
replacement bridge for the East Span of
the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge
(SF-OBB) in California. Under the
Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA), NMFS is requesting comments
on its proposal to issue an authorization
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:46 Jul 02, 2008
Jkt 214001
to CALTRANS to incidentally take, by
harassment, small numbers of these
species of pinnipeds and cetaceans
during the next 12 months.
DATES: Comments and information must
be received no later than August 4,
2008.
ADDRESSES: Comments on the
application should be addressed to P.
Michael Payne, Chief, Permits,
Conservation and Education Division,
Office of Protected Resources, National
Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 EastWest Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910–3225, or by telephoning the
contact listed here. The mailbox address
for providing email comments is
PR1.0648–XI68@noaa.gov. Comments
sent via e-mail, including all
attachments, must not exceed a 10–
megabyte file size. A copy of the 2001
application, the 2008 renewal request,
the January 2005 Marine Mammal and
Acoustic Monitoring report, and the
August 2006 Hydroacoustic
Measurements report may be obtained
by writing to this address or by
telephoning one of the contacts listed
here.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shane Guan, NMFS, (301) 713–2289, ext
137, or Monica DeAngelis, NMFS, (562)
980–3232.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the
MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct
the Secretary of Commerce to allow,
upon request, the incidental, but not
intentional, taking of small numbers of
marine mammals by U.S. citizens who
engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified
geographical region if certain findings
are made and either regulations are
issued or, the taking is limited to
harassment, notice of a proposed
authorization is provided to the public
for review.
Permission shall be granted if NMFS
finds that the taking will have a
negligible impact on the species or
stock(s) and will not have an
unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for
certain subsistence uses and if the
permissible methods of taking and
requirements pertaining to the
mitigation, monitoring, and reporting of
such taking are set forth. NMFS has
defined ‘‘negligible impact’’ in 50 CFR
216.103 as ’’...an impact resulting from
the specified activity that cannot be
reasonably expected to, and is not
reasonably likely to, adversely affect the
species or stock through effects on
annual rates of recruitment or survival.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA
established an expedited process by
which citizens of the United States can
apply for an authorization to
incidentally take small numbers of
marine mammals by harassment. Except
with respect to certain activities not
pertinent here, the MMPA defines
‘‘harassment’’ as:
any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance
which (i) has the potential to injure a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild
[Level A harassment]; or (ii) has the potential
to disturb a marine mammal or marine
mammal stock in the wild by causing
disruption of behavioral patterns, including,
but not limited to, migration, breathing,
nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering
[Level B harassment].
Section 101(a)(5)(D) establishes a 45–
day time limit for NMFS review of an
application followed by a 30–day public
notice and comment period on any
proposed authorizations for the
incidental harassment of small numbers
of marine mammals. Within 45 days of
the close of the comment period, NMFS
must either issue or deny issuance of
the authorization.
Summary of Request
On March 3, 2008, CALTRANS
submitted a request to NOAA requesting
renewal of an IHA for the possible
harassment of small numbers of
California sea lions (Zalophus
californianus), Pacific harbor seals
(Phoca vitulina richardsii), harbor
porpoises (Phocoena phocoena), and
gray whales (Eschrichtius robustus)
incidental to construction of a
replacement bridge for the East Span of
the SF-OBB, in San Francisco Bay
(SFB), California. An IHA was issued to
CALTRANS for this activity on May 2,
2007 and it expired on May 1, 2008 (72
FR 25748, May 7, 2007). However, no
pile driving activities were conducted
during that period. In the March 3
request, CALTRANS states that it has
scheduled pile driving for 2008 - 2009,
which CALTRANS intended to begin in
June 2008. A detailed description of the
SF-OBB project was provided in the
November 14, 2003 (68 FR 64595)
Federal Register notice of IHA and is
not repeated here. Please refer to that
Federal Register notice.
On June 2, 2008, CALTRANS
provided an update on the proposed
pile driving activities planned for the
2008 season. In its update, CALTRANS
states that pile driving for the 2008
construction would be driving the 42 48 in (0.17 - 0.19 m) diameter temporary
piles, as opposed to the 5.9 - 8.2 ft (1.8
- 2.5 m) diameter permanent piles.
Therefore, the noise from pile driving of
these temporary piles would be far less
than from previous pile driving
E:\FR\FM\03JYN1.SGM
03JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 129 (Thursday, July 3, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38176-38180]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-15154]
[[Page 38176]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XI42
Small Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities;
Harbor Activities Related to the Delta IV/Evolved Expendable Launch
Vehicle at Vandenberg Air Force Base, CA
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; proposed incidental harassment authorization; request
for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS received a request from United Launch Alliance (ULA) for
a one-year authorization to take small numbers of marine mammals by
harassment incidental to Delta Mariner operations, cargo unloading
activities, harbor maintenance dredging, and kelp habitat mitigation
activities related to the Delta IV/Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle
(EELV) at south Vandenberg Air Force Base, CA (VAFB). Pursuant to the
Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), NMFS requests comments on its
proposal to authorize ULA to take, by Level B harassment, small numbers
of several species of pinnipeds at south VAFB beginning August 2008.
DATES: Comments and information must be received no later than August
4, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Comments on the application should be addressed to P.
Michael Payne, Chief, Permits, Conservation and Education Division,
Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service, 1315
East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910-3225. The mailbox address
for providing email comments is PR1.0648XI42@noaa.gov. Comments sent
via e-mail, including all attachments, must not exceed a 10-megabyte
file size.
A copy of the application containing a list of the references used
in this document may be obtained by writing to the address specified
above, telephoning the contact listed below (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT), or visiting the internet at: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental.htm.
Documents cited in this notice may be viewed, by appointment,
during regular business hours, at the aforementioned address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeannine Cody or Candace Nachman,
Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, (301) 713-2289, or Monica
DeAngelis, NMFS Southwest Region, (562) 980-3232.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.)
direct the Secretary of Commerce to allow, upon request, the
incidental, but not intentional taking of small numbers of marine
mammals by United States citizens who engage in a specified activity
(other than commercial fishing) within a specified geographical region
if certain findings are made and either regulations are issued or, if
the taking is limited to harassment, a notice of a proposed
authorization is provided to the public for review.
Authorization for incidental takings shall be granted if NMFS finds
that the taking will have a negligible impact on the species or
stock(s), and will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for certain subsistence uses,
and if the permissible methods of taking and requirements pertaining to
the mitigation, monitoring, and reporting of such taking are set forth.
NMFS has defined ``negligible impact'' in 50 CFR 216.103 as:
''...an impact resulting from the specified activity that cannot
be reasonably expected to, and is not reasonably likely to,
adversely affect the species or stock through effects on annual
rates of recruitment or survival.''
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA established an expedited process
by which citizens of the United States can apply for an authorization
to incidentally take small numbers of marine mammals by harassment.
Except for certain categories of activities not pertinent here, the
MMPA defines ``harassment'' as:
any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance which (i) has the
potential to injure a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the
wild [``Level A harassment'']; or (ii) has the potential to disturb
a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild by causing
disruption of behavioral patterns, including, but not limited to,
migration, breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering
[``Level B harassment''].
Section 101(a)(5)(D) establishes a 45-day time limit for NMFS'
review of an application followed by a 30-day public notice and comment
period on any proposed authorizations for the incidental harassment of
small numbers of marine mammals. Within 45 days of the close of the
comment period, NMFS must either issue or deny the authorization.
Summary of Request
On February 18, 2008, NMFS received an application from ULA
requesting an authorization for the harassment of small numbers of
Pacific harbor seals (Phoca vitulina richardsi) and California sea
lions (Zalophus californianus) incidental to harbor activities related
to the Delta IV/EELV, including: transport vessel operations, cargo
movement activities, harbor maintenance dredging, and kelp habitat
mitigation operations. In addition, northern elephant seals (Mirounga
angustirostris) may also be incidentally harassed but in even smaller
numbers. Incidental Harassment Authorizations (IHAs) were issued to The
Boeing Company, now ULA, on May 15, 2002 (67 FR 36151, May 23, 2002),
May 20, 2003 (68 FR 36540, June 18, 2003), May 20, 2004 (69 FR 29696,
May 25, 2004), May 23, 2005 (70 FR 30697, May 27, 2005), June 20, 2006
(71 FR 36321, June 26, 2006), and June 21, 2007 (72 FR 34444, June 22,
2007) each for a 1-year period. No work and, therefore, no monitoring
was conducted under the 2007 IHA. The harbor where activities will take
place is on south VAFB approximately 2.5 mi (4.02 km) south of Point
Arguello, CA and approximately 1 mi (1.61 km) north of the nearest
marine mammal pupping site (i.e., Rocky Point).
Specified Activities
Delta Mariner off-loading operations and associated cargo movements
will occur a maximum of 3 times per year. The Delta Mariner is a 312-ft
(95.1-m) long, 84-ft (25.6-m) wide steel hull ocean-going vessel
capable of operating at an 8-ft (2.4-m) draft. For the first few visits
to the south VAFB harbor, tug boats will accompany the Delta Mariner.
Sources of noise from the Delta Mariner include ventilating propellers
used for maneuvering into position and the cargo bay door when it
becomes disengaged. Removal of the common booster core (CBC) from the
vessel requires use of an elevating platform transporter (EPT), an
additional source of noise with sound levels measured at approximately
85 decibels (dB) A-weighted (re 20 microPascals at 1-m) 20 ft (6.1 m)
from the engine exhaust when the engine is running mid-speed (Acentech,
1998). Procedures require two short (approximately 1/3 second) beeps of
the horn prior to starting the ignition. The sound level of the EPT
horn ranged from 62-70 dB A-weighted at 200 ft (60.9 m) away, and 84-
112 dB A-weighted at 25 ft (7.6 m) away. Containers containing flight
hardware items will be towed off the Delta Mariner by a tractor tug
that generates a sound level of
[[Page 38177]]
approximately 87 dB A-weighted at 50 ft (15.2 m) while in operational
mode. Total docking and cargo movement activities is estimated to be
approximately 14 to 18 hours in good weather.
To accommodate the Delta Mariner, the harbor will need to be
dredged, removing up to 5,000 cubic yards of sediment per dredging.
Dredging will involve the use of heavy equipment, including a clamshell
dredge, dredging crane, a small tug, dredging barge, dump trucks, and a
skip loader. Measured sound levels from this equipment are roughly
equivalent to those estimated for the wharf modification equipment: 43-
81 dB A-weighted at 250 ft (76.2 m). Dredge operations, from set-up to
tear-down, would continue 24-hr a day for 3 to 5 weeks. Sedimentation
surveys have shown that initial dredging indicates that maintenance
dredging should be required annually or twice per year, depending on
the hardware delivery schedule.
A more detailed description of the work proposed for 2008 is
contained in the application which is available upon request (see
ADDRESSES) and in the Final U.S. Air Force Environmental Assessment for
Harbor Activities Associated with the Delta IV Program at Vandenberg
Air Force Base (ENSR International, 2001).
Marine Mammals Affected by the Activity
Pacific Harbor Seals
The marine mammal species likely to be harassed incidental to
harbor activities at south VAFB are the Pacific harbor seal and the
California sea lion. The most recent estimate of the Pacific harbor
seal population in California is 31,600 seals. Since 1990 there has
been no net population growth along the mainland or the Channel
Islands. The decrease in population growth rate has occurred at the
same time as a decrease in human-caused mortality and may indicate that
the population has reached its environmental carrying capacity
(Carretta et al., 2007). The total population of harbor seals on VAFB
is now estimated to be 1,099 (maximum of 515 seals hauled out at one
time on south VAFB) based on sighting surveys and telemetry data (SRS
Technologies, 2003).
The daily haul-out behavior of harbor seals along the south VAFB
coastline is primarily dependent on time of day. The highest number of
seals haul-out at south VAFB between 1100 through 1600 hours. In
addition, haul-out behavior at all sites seems to be influenced by
environmental factors such as high swell, tide height, and wind. The
combination of all three may prevent seals from hauling out at most
sites. The number of seals hauled out at a site can vary greatly from
day to day based on environmental conditions. Harbor seals occasionally
haul out at a beach 250 ft (76.2 m) west of the south VAFB harbor and
on rocks outside the harbor breakwater where ULA will be conducting
Delta Mariner operations, cargo loading, dredging activities, and reef
enhancement. The maximum number of seals present during the 2001
dredging of the harbor was 23 (averaging 7 per observation period), and
the maximum number hauled out during the 2002 wharf modification
activities was 43, averaging 21 per day when tidal conditions were
favorable for hauling out. Dredging and reef enhancement did not occur
from 2003-2007. The harbor seal pupping site closest to south VAFB
harbor is Rocky Point, approximately 1 mi (1.61 km) north of the
harbor. However, harbor seals have been reported to haul-out on the
coast at Sudden Ranch, approximately 0.5 mi (0.8 km) south of the
harbor.
Several factors affect the seasonal haul-out behavior of harbor
seals including environmental conditions, reproduction, and molting.
Harbor seal numbers at VAFB begin to increase in March during the
pupping season (March to June) as females spend more time on shore
nursing pups. The number of hauled-out seals is at its highest during
the molt, which occurs from May through July. During the molting
season, tagged harbor seals at VAFB increased their time spent on shore
by 22.4 percent; however, all seals continued to make daily trips to
sea to forage. Molting harbor seals entering the water because of a
disturbance are not adversely affected in their ability to molt and do
not endure thermoregulatory stress. During pupping and molting season,
harbor seals at the south VAFB sites expand into haul-out areas that
are not used the rest of the year. The number of seals hauled out
begins to decrease in August after the molt is complete and reaches the
lowest number in late fall and early winter.
California Sea Lions
During the wharf modification activity in June-July 2002,
California sea lions were observed hauling out on the breakwater in
small numbers (up to 6 individuals). Although this is considered to be
an unusual occurrence and is possibly related to fish schooling in the
area, ULA included sea lions in the request.
California sea lions range from British Columbia to Mexico. The
most recent population estimates for the California sea lions range
from 237,000 to 244,000 individuals (Caretta et al., 2007). Between
1975 and 2001, the population growth rate was 5.4-6.1 percent. A 1985-
1987 population survey indicated that most individuals on the Northern
Channel Islands were on San Miguel Island (SMI), with the population
ranging from 2,235 to over 17,000. The largest numbers of California
sea lions in the VAFB vicinity occur at Lion Rock, 0.4 mi (0.64 km)
southeast of Point Sal. This area is approximately 1.5 mi (2.41 km)
north of the VAFB boundary. At least 100 sea lions can be observed
during any season at this site. The Point Arguello beaches and the
rocky ledges of South Rocky Point on south VAFB are haulout areas that
may be used by California sea lions. In 2003, at least 145 sea lions
were observed at Rocky Point, including five pups that did not survive
due to abandonment shortly after birth. This was thought to be an El
Nino effect, as there had never been any previously reported sea lion
births at VAFB (Thorson, 2003).
Each year, small groups of sea lions have been observed heading
south along the VAFB coastline in April and May (Tetra Tech, 1997).
Starting in August, large groups of sea lions can be seen moving north,
in groups varying in size from 25 to more than 300 (Roest, 1995). This
concurs with established migration patterns (Reeves et al., 1992;
Roest, 1995). Juvenile sea lions can be observed hauled-out with harbor
seals along the South Base sites from July through September (Tetra
Tech, 1997). Starving and exhausted sub-adult sea lions are fairly
common on central California beaches during the months of July and
August (Roest, 1995).
During the breeding season, most California sea lions inhabit
southern California and Mexico. Rookery sites in southern California
are limited to SMI and the southerly Channel Islands of San Nicolas,
Santa Barbara, and San Clemente. Breeding season begins in mid-May,
occurring within 10 days of arrival at the rookeries. Molting occurs
gradually over several months in the late summer and fall. Because the
molt is not catastrophic, the sea lions can enter the water to feed.
Male California sea lions migrate annually. In the spring they
migrate southward to breeding rookeries in the Channel Islands and
Mexico, then migrate northward in the late summer following breeding
season. Females appear to remain near the breeding rookeries. The
greatest population on land occurs in September and October during the
post-breeding dispersal, although many of the sea lions,
[[Page 38178]]
particularly juveniles and sub-adult and adult males, may move north
away from the Channel Islands.
Other Marine Mammals
Other marine mammal species are rare to infrequent along the south
VAFB coast during certain times of the year and are unlikely to be
harassed by ULA's activities. These four species are: the northern
elephant seal, the northern fur seal (Callorhinus ursinus), Guadalupe
fur seal (Arctocephalus townsendi), and Steller sea lion (Eumetopias
jubatus). Northern elephant seals may occur on VAFB but do not haul out
in the harbor area. Northern fur seals, Guadalupe fur seals, and
Steller sea lions occur along the California coast and Northern Channel
Islands but are not likely to be found on VAFB. Descriptions of the
biology and distribution of these species can be found in the NMFS
Stock Assessment Reports at https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/sars/, as well
as other sources such as Stewart and Yochem (1994, 1984), Forney et al.
(2000), Koski et al. (1998), Barlow et al. (1993), Stewart and DeLong
(1995), and Lowry et al. (1992). Please refer to those documents for
information on these species.
Potential Effects of Activities on Marine Mammals
Acoustic and visual stimuli generated by the use of heavy equipment
during the Delta Mariner off-loading operations, dredging, and kelp
habitat mitigation and the increased presence of personnel, may cause
short-term disturbance to harbor seals and California sea lions hauled
out on the beach and rocks near south VAFB harbor. This disturbance
from acoustic and visual stimuli is the principal means of marine
mammal taking associated with these activities.
Based on the measured sounds of construction equipment, such as
might be used during ULA's activities, sound level intensity decreases
proportional to the square root of the distance from the source. A
dredging crane at the end of the dock producing 88 dBA of noise would
be approximately 72 dBA at the nearest beach or the end of the
breakwater, roughly 250 ft (76.2 m) away. The EPT produces
approximately 85 dBA, measured less than 20 ft (6 m) from the engine
exhaust, when the engine is running at mid speed. The EPT operation
procedure requires two short beeps of the horn (approximately 1/3 of a
second each) prior to starting the ignition. Sound level measurements
for the horn ranged from 84-112 dBA at 25 ft (7.6 m) away and 62-70 dBA
at 200 ft (61 m) away. The highest measurement was taken from the side
of the vehicle where the horn is mounted. Ambient background noise
measured approximately 250 ft (76.2 m) from the beach was estimated to
be 35-48 dBA (Acentech, 1998; EPA, 1971).
Pinnipeds sometimes show startle reactions when exposed to sudden
brief sounds. An acoustic stimulus with sudden onset (such as a sonic
boom) may be analogous to a ``looming'' visual stimulus (Hayes and
Saif, 1967), which may elicit flight away from the source (Berrens et
al., 1988). The onset of operations by a loud sound source, such as the
EPT during CBC off-loading procedures, may elicit such a reaction. In
addition, the movements of cranes and dredges may represent a
``looming'' visual stimulus to seals hauled out in close proximity.
Seals and sea lions exposed to such acoustic and visual stimuli may
either exhibit a startle response and/or leave the haul-out site.
According to the MMPA and NMFS implementing regulations, if harbor
activities disrupt the behavioral patterns of harbor seals or sea
lions, these activities would take marine mammals by Level B
harassment. In general, if the received level of the noise stimulus
exceeds both the background (ambient) noise level and the auditory
threshold of the animals, and especially if the stimulus is novel to
them, there may be a behavioral response. The probability and degree of
response will also depend on the season, the group composition of the
pinnipeds, and the type of activity in which they are engaged. Minor
and brief responses, such as short-duration startle or alert reactions,
are not likely to constitute disruption of behavioral patterns, such as
migration, nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering (i.e., Level B
harassment) and would not cause injury or mortality to marine mammals.
On the other hand, startle and alert reactions accompanied by
large-scale movements, such as stampedes into the water of hundreds of
animals, may rise to the degree of Level A harassment and could result
in injury of individuals. In addition, such large-scale movements by
dense aggregations of marine mammals or at pupping sites could
potentially lead to takes by injury or death. However, there is no
potential for large-scale movements leading to serious injury or
mortality near the south VAFB harbor because on average the number of
harbor seals hauled out near the site is less than 30 individuals, and
there is no pupping at nearby sites. The effects of the harbor
activities are expected to be limited to short-term startle responses
and localized behavioral changes.
According to the June 2002 dock modification construction report
(ENSRI, 2002), the maximum number of harbor seals hauled out each day
ranged from 23 to 25 animals. There were 15 occasions in which
construction noise, vehicle noise, or noise from a fishing boat caused
the seals to lift their heads. Flushing only occurred due to fishing
activities, which were unrelated to the construction activities. The
sea lions were less reactive to the construction noise than the harbor
seals. None of the construction activities caused any of the sea lions
to leave the jetty rocks, and there was only one incident of a head
alert reaction.
The report from the December 2002 dredging activities show that the
number of Pacific harbor seals ranged from 0 to 19, and that California
sea lions did not haul out during the monitoring period. On 10
occasions, harbor seals showed head alerts, although two of the alerts
were for disturbances that were not related to the project. No harbor
seals flushed during the activities on the dock.
For a further discussion of the anticipated effects of the planned
activities on harbor seals in the area, please refer to the
application, NMFS 2005 Environmental Assessment (EA), and ENSR
International's 2001 Final EA.
Numbers of Marine Mammals Expected to be Harassed
ULA estimates that a maximum of 43 harbor seals per day may be
hauled out near the south VAFB harbor, with a daily average of 21 seals
sighted when tidal conditions were favorable during previous dredging
operations in the harbor. Considering the maximum and average number of
seals hauled out per day, assuming that the seals may be seen twice a
day, and using a maximum total of 73 operating days in 2008-2009, NMFS
estimates that a maximum of 767 to 1,570 Pacific harbor seals may be
subject to Level B harassment out of a total estimated population of
31,600. These numbers are small relative to this population size (2.4-5
percent).
During wharf modification activities, a maximum of six California
sea lions were seen hauling out in a single day. Based on the above-
mentioned calculation, NMFS believes that a maximum of 219 California
sea lions may be subject to Level B harassment out of a total estimated
population of 240,000. These numbers are small relative to this
population size (less than 0.1 percent). Up to 10 northern elephant
seals (because they may be in nearby waters) may be subject to Level B
harassment out of a total estimated
[[Page 38179]]
population of 101,000. These numbers are small relative to this
population size (less than 0.01 percent).
Possible Effects of Activities on Marine Mammal Habitat
ULA does not anticipate any loss or modification to the habitat
used by Pacific harbor seals or California sea lions that haul out near
the south VAFB harbor. The harbor seal and sea lion haul-out sites near
south VAFB harbor are not used as breeding, molting, or mating sites;
therefore, it is not expected that the activities in the harbor will
have any impact on the ability of Pacific harbor seals or California
sea lions in the area to reproduce.
ULA anticipates unavoidable kelp removal during dredging. This
habitat modification will not affect the marine mammal habitat.
However, ULA will mitigate for the removal of kelp habitat by placing
150 tons of rocky substrate in a sandy area between the breakwater and
the mooring dolphins to enhance an existing artificial reef. This type
of mitigation was implemented by the Army Corps of Engineers following
the 1984 and 1989 dredging. A lush kelp bed adjacent to the sandy area
has developed from the efforts. The substrate will consist of
approximately 150 sharp-faced boulders, each with a diameter of about 2
ft (0.61 m) and each weighing about 1 ton (907 kg). The boulders will
be brought in by truck from an off-site quarry and loaded by crane onto
a small barge at the wharf. The barge is towed by a tugboat to a
location along the mooring dolphins from which a small barge-mounted
crane can place them into the sandy area. ULA plans to perform the reef
enhancement in conjunction with the next maintenance dredging event in
order to minimize cost and disturbances to animals. Noise will be
generated by the trucks delivering the boulders to the harbor and
during the operation of unloading the boulders onto the barges and into
the water.
Proposed Mitigation Measures
To reduce the potential for disturbance from visual and acoustic
stimuli associated with the activities, ULA proposes to undertake the
following marine mammal mitigating measures:
(1) If activities occur during nighttime hours, lighting will be
turned on before dusk and left on the entire night to avoid startling
pinnipeds at night.
(2) Activities will be initiated before dusk.
(3) Construction noises must be kept constant (i.e., not
interrupted by periods of quiet in excess of 30 minutes) while
pinnipeds are present.
(4) If activities cease for longer than 30 minutes and pinnipeds
are in the area, start-up of activities will include a gradual increase
in noise levels.
(5) A NMFS-approved marine mammal observer will visually monitor
the harbor seals on the beach adjacent to the harbor and on rocks for
any flushing or other behaviors as a result of ULA's activities (see
Monitoring).
(6) The Delta Mariner and accompanying vessels will enter the
harbor only when the tide is too high for harbor seals to haul-out on
the rocks, and the vessel will reduce speed to 1.5 to 2 knots (1.5-2.0
nm/hr; 2.8-3.7 km/hr) once the vessel is within 3 mi (4.83 km) of the
harbor. The vessel will enter the harbor stern first, approaching the
wharf and mooring dolphins at less than 0.75 knot (1.4 km/hr).
(7) As alternate dredge methods are explored, the dredge contractor
may introduce quieter techniques and equipment.
Proposed Monitoring Measures
As part of its 2002 application, Boeing, now ULA, provided a
proposed monitoring plan for assessing impacts to harbor seals from the
activities at south VAFB harbor and for determining when mitigation
measures should be employed. NMFS proposes the same plan for this IHA.
A NMFS-approved and VAFB-designated biologically trained observer
will monitor the area for pinnipeds during all harbor activities.
During nighttime activities, the harbor area will be illuminated, and
the monitor will use a night vision scope. Monitoring activities will
consist of:
(1) Conducting baseline observation of pinnipeds in the project
area prior to initiating project activities.
(2) Conducting and recording observations on pinnipeds in the
vicinity of the harbor for the duration of the activity occurring when
tides are low enough for pinnipeds to haul out
(2 ft, 0.61 m, or less).
(3) Conducting post-construction observations of pinniped haul-outs
in the project area to determine whether animals disturbed by the
project activities return to the haul-out.
Monitoring results from previous years of these activities have
been reviewed and incorporated into the analysis of potential effects
in this document, as well as the take estimates.
Reporting
ULA will notify NMFS 2 weeks prior to initiation of each activity.
After each activity is completed, ULA will provide a report to NMFS
within 90 days. This report will provide dates, times, durations, and
locations of specific activities, details of pinniped behavioral
observations, and estimates of numbers of affected pinnipeds and
impacts (behavioral or other). In addition, the report will include
information on the weather, tidal state, horizontal visibility, and
composition (species, gender, and age class) and locations of haul-out
group(s). In the unanticipated event that any cases of pinniped injury
or mortality are judged to result from these activities, this will be
reported to NMFS immediately.
Endangered Species Act (ESA)
This action will not affect species listed under the ESA that are
under NMFS' jurisdiction. VAFB formally consulted with the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service in 1998 on the possible take of southern sea
otters during Boeing's, now ULA, harbor activities at south VAFB. A
Biological Opinion was issued in August 2001, which concluded that the
EELV Program is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of the
southern sea otter, and no injury or mortality is expected. The
activities covered by this IHA are analyzed in that Biological Opinion,
and this IHA does not modify the action in a manner that was not
previously analyzed.
National Environmental Policy Act
In 2001, the United States Air Force (USAF) prepared an EA for
Harbor Activities Associated with the Delta IV Program at VAFB. In
2005, NMFS prepared an EA supplementing the information contained in
the USAF EA and issued a Finding of No Significant Impact on the
issuance of an IHA for Boeing's, now ULA, harbor activities in
accordance with section 6.01 of the NOAA Administrative Order 216-6
(Environmental Review Procedures for Implementing the National
Environmental Policy Act, May 20, 1999). ULA's proposed activities and
impacts for 2007-2008 are expected to be within the scope of NMFS' 2005
EA and FONSI.
Preliminary Conclusions
NMFS proposes to issue an IHA to ULA for harbor activities related
to the Delta IV/EELV to take place at south VAFB over a 1-year period.
Issuance of this IHA would be contingent upon adherence to the proposed
mitigation, monitoring, and reporting requirements described in this FR
notice. NMFS has preliminarily determined that the impact of harbor
activities related to the Delta IV/EELV at VAFB, including:
[[Page 38180]]
transport vessel operations, cargo movement activities, harbor
maintenance dredging, and kelp habitat mitigation, would result in
Level B harassment only of small numbers of Pacific harbor seals,
California sea lions, and northern elephant seals; and would have a
negligible impact on the affected species. The provision requiring that
the activity not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the availability
of the affected species or stock for subsistence uses does not apply
for this proposed action. Northern fur seals, Guadalupe fur seals, and
Steller sea lions are unlikely to be found in the area and, therefore,
will not be affected. No rookeries, mating grounds, areas of
concentrated feeding, or other areas of special significance for marine
mammals occur within or near south VAFB harbor.
Proposed Authorization
As a result of these preliminary determinations, NMFS proposes to
issue an IHA to ULA for the Delta IV EELV Program, provided that the
previously mentioned mitigation, monitoring, and reporting requirements
are incorporated.
Dated: June 27, 2008.
James H. Lecky,
Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-15154 Filed 7-2-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S