Airworthiness Directives; Fokker Model F.28 Mark 0070 and Mark 0100 Airplanes, 37903-37905 [E8-14976]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 2, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Indication of Previous Oil Can Repairs
(k) If any previous oil can repair is found
during the detailed inspection required by
paragraph (g) or (h) of this AD, before further
flight, do a detailed inspection of the web for
cracks and oil cans, as shown in Figure 4 or
Figure 5 of the service bulletin, as applicable.
(1) If no crack and no oil can are found,
repeat the detailed inspection in accordance
with paragraph (h) of this AD.
(2) If any oil can is found, before further
flight, do the eddy current inspection for
cracks, as shown in Figure 3 of the service
bulletin. If no crack is found during the eddy
current inspection required by this
paragraph, do the actions specified in
paragraph (j)(1) or (j)(2) of this AD, as
applicable, at the time specified in the
applicable paragraph.
Repair of Cracks
(l) If any crack is found during any
inspection required by this AD, before further
flight, repair in accordance with the service
bulletin. If any crack or damage exceeds
limits specified in the service bulletin and
the service bulletin specifies to contact
Boeing for appropriate action: Before further
flight, repair per a method approved by the
Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), FAA; or per data meeting the type
certification basis of the airplane approved
by a Boeing Company Designated
Engineering Representative who has been
authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to
make such findings; or using a method
approved in accordance with the procedures
specified in paragraph (n) of this AD. For a
repair method to be approved, the approval
must specifically reference this AD.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
New Requirements of This AD
(m) As of the effective date of this AD, if
any crack or damage is found during any
inspection required by this AD, and Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 747–53A2482,
Revision 1, dated February 21, 2008,
specifies to contact Boeing for appropriate
action (repair data): Before further flight,
repair the crack or damage using a method
approved in accordance with the procedures
specified in paragraph (n) of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(n)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in
accordance with the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector
(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District
Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair
required by this AD, if it is approved by an
Authorized Representative for the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Delegation Option
Authorization Organization who has been
authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:06 Jul 01, 2008
Jkt 214001
make those findings. For a repair method to
be approved, the repair must meet the
certification basis of the airplane.
(4) AMOCs approved previously in
accordance with AD 2004–16–09 are not
approved as AMOCs for the corresponding
provisions of paragraph (g) of this AD. They
are approved as AMOCs for the
corresponding provisions of paragraphs (h),
(i), (j), (k), (l), and (m) of this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 24,
2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–14974 Filed 7–1–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2008–0675; Directorate
Identifier 2007–NM–192–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Fokker
Model F.28 Mark 0070 and Mark 0100
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to
supersede an existing airworthiness
directive (AD) that applies to certain
Fokker Model F.28 Mark 0070 and 0100
airplanes. The existing AD currently
requires a one-time inspection of the
main landing gear (MLG) main fitting
for cracks, and repair if necessary. The
existing AD also currently requires
installing a placard and revising the
airplane flight manual to include
procedures to prohibit the application of
brakes during backward movement of
the airplane. This proposed AD would
require repetitive eddy current
inspections of the MLG main fitting and
rework before further flight as
applicable. This proposed AD results
from reports that a final solution
eliminating the cause of the crack
initiation mechanism is not yet
available and that repetitive inspections
are necessary. We are proposing this AD
to detect and correct cracks in the MLG
main fitting, which could result in
reduced structural integrity of the MLG
main fitting.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by August 1, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
37903
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact Fokker Services B.V.,
Technical Services Dept., P.O. Box 231,
2150 AE Nieuw-Vennep, the
Netherlands.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(telephone 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom
Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 227–1137; fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2008–0675; Directorate Identifier
2007–NM–192–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
E:\FR\FM\02JYP1.SGM
02JYP1
37904
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 2, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Discussion
On March 10, 2006, we issued AD
2006–06–07, amendment 39–14516 (71
FR 14363, March 22, 2006), for certain
Fokker Model F.28 Mark 0070 and Mark
0100 airplanes. That AD requires
inspecting the main landing gear (MLG)
main fitting for cracks, and repairing if
necessary. That AD also requires
installing a placard and revising the
airplane flight manual to include
procedures to prohibit the application of
brakes during backward movement of
the airplane. That AD resulted from a
report that an MLG main fitting failed
on an airplane that was braking while
moving backward. We issued that AD to
detect and correct cracks in the MLG
main fitting, which could result in
reduced structural integrity of the MLG
main fitting.
Actions Since Existing AD Was Issued
Since we issued AD 2006–06–07, we
received reports from The Civil Aviation
Authority—The Netherlands (CAA–NL),
which is the airworthiness authority for
the Netherlands, that a final solution
eliminating the cause of the crack
initiation mechanism is not yet
available. Therefore, the inspection
required by AD 2006–06–07 must now
be done repetitively, until a final
solution is developed to adequately
address the identified unsafe condition
of this AD.
Relevant Service Information
Messier-Dowty has issued Service
Bulletin F100–32–111, dated December
20, 2005. The service bulletin describes
procedures for doing a repetitive eddy
current inspection of the MLG main
fitting for cracks, and reworking the
MLG main fitting as applicable.
Accomplishing the actions specified in
the service information is intended to
adequately address the unsafe
condition. The CAA–NL mandated the
service information and issued
airworthiness directive NL–2006–003,
dated February 7, 2006, to ensure the
continued airworthiness of these
airplanes in the Netherlands.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of the Proposed AD
These airplanes are manufactured in
the Netherlands and are type
certificated for operation in the United
States under the provisions of section
21.29 of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and the
applicable bilateral airworthiness
agreement. Pursuant to this bilateral
airworthiness agreement, the CAA–NL
has kept the FAA informed of the
situation described above. We have
examined the CAA–NL’s findings,
evaluated all pertinent information, and
determined that AD action is necessary
for airplanes of this type design that are
certificated for operation in the United
States.
This proposed AD would supersede
AD 2006–06–07 and would retain the
requirements of the existing AD. This
proposed AD would also require
accomplishing the actions specified in
the service information described
previously, except as discussed under
‘‘Differences Between the Proposed AD
and the Service Bulletin.’’
Differences Between the Proposed AD
and the Service Bulletin
Operators should note that, unlike the
procedures described in the referenced
Messier-Dowty Service Bulletin F100–
32–111, dated December 20, 2005, the
proposed AD would not permit further
flight with any cracks in the MLG main
fitting. Due to the safety implications
and consequences of such cracking
operators must repair all cracked MGL
main fittings before further flight.
Costs of Compliance
The following table provides the
estimated costs for U.S. operators to
comply with this proposed AD.
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Work
hours
Inspection (required by AD
2006–06–07).
AFM Revision and Placard Installation (required by AD
2006–06–07).
Inspection (new proposed action).
Average labor
rate per hour
$80
None .......................................
$160
11
$1,760
1
80
None .......................................
80
11
880
6
80
$540 ($270 per fitting) ............
1,020
12
12,240
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
17:06 Jul 01, 2008
Fleet cost
2
Authority for This Rulemaking
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Number of
U.S.-registered
airplanes
Cost per
airplane
Parts
Jkt 214001
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the proposed regulation:
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket. See the ADDRESSES section
for a location to examine the regulatory
evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
E:\FR\FM\02JYP1.SGM
02JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 2, 2008 / Proposed Rules
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13
by removing amendment 39–14516 (71
FR 14363, March 22, 2006) and adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
Fokker: Docket No. FAA–2008–0675;
Directorate Identifier 2007–NM–192–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The FAA must receive comments on
this AD action by August 1, 2008.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD supersedes AD 2006–06–07.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Fokker Model F.28
Mark 0070 and Mark 0100 airplanes,
certificated in any category, equipped with
Messier-Dowty main landing gears (MLGs).
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from reports that a final
solution eliminating the cause of the crack
initiation mechanism is not yet available. We
are issuing this AD to detect and correct
cracks in the main landing gear (MLG) main
fitting, which could result in reduced
structural integrity of the MLG main fitting.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Restatement of Requirements of AD 2006–
06–07
Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) Revision and
Placard Installation
(f) Within 14 days after April 26, 2006 (the
effective date of AD 2006–06–07), amend the
Limitations section of the Fokker F.28 AFM
to prohibit application of brakes during
backward movement of the airplane. This
may be done by inserting a copy of this AD
in the AFM.
Note 1: When a statement to prohibit
application of brakes during backward
movement of the airplane has been included
in the general revisions of the AFM, the
general revisions may be inserted into the
AFM, and the copy of this AD may be
removed from the AFM.
(g) Within 14 days after April 26, 2006,
affix a placard on the pedestal, next to the
parking brake handle, having the following
wording: ‘‘APPLICATION OF BRAKES
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:06 Jul 01, 2008
Jkt 214001
DURING BACKWARD MOVEMENT IS
PROHIBITED.’’
Inspection and Corrective Action
(h) At the applicable time specified in
paragraph (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this AD: Do an
eddy current inspection of the MLG main
fittings and repair before further flight as
applicable, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of MessierDowty Service Bulletin F100–32–106,
including Appendices A through C and
excluding Appendix D, dated February 18,
2005, except as provided by paragraphs (i)
and (j) of this AD.
(1) For airplanes on which an inspection
has not been done in accordance with
Messier-Dowty Service Bulletin F100–32–
104, Revision 2, dated October 30, 2003:
Within 3 months after April 26, 2006.
(2) For airplanes on which an inspection
has been done in accordance with MessierDowty Service Bulletin F100–32–104,
Revision 2, dated October 30, 2003: Within
2,000 flight cycles since the last inspection
done in accordance with the service bulletin
or within 3 months after April 26, 2006,
whichever occurs later.
Exceptions to the Service Bulletin
(i) Where Messier-Dowty Service Bulletin
F100–32–106, including Appendices A
through C and excluding Appendix D, dated
February 18, 2005, specifies contacting the
manufacturer for repair: Before further flight,
repair using a method approved by either the
Manager, International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the
Civil Aviation Authority—The Netherlands
(CAA–NL) (or its delegated agent).
(j) Although Messier-Dowty Service
Bulletin F100–32–106, including Appendices
A through C and excluding Appendix D,
dated February 18, 2005, specifies to submit
certain information to the manufacturer, this
AD does not include that requirement.
Parts Installation
(k) As of April 26, 2006, and until the
effective date of this AD, no person may
install, on any airplane, a Messier-Dowty
MLG, unless it has been inspected/repaired
according to paragraph (h) of this AD.
New Requirements of This AD
Inspection and Repair
(l) At the applicable times specified in
paragraphs (l)(1), (l)(2), and (l)(3) of this AD:
Do an eddy current inspection of the MLG
main fitting for cracks, and rework the MLG
main fitting if applicable, in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of MessierDowty Service Bulletin F100–32–111,
including Appendices A through C and
excluding Appendix D, dated December 20,
2005; except as provided by paragraph (m) of
this AD. The rework must be done before
further flight.
(1) For all MLG main fittings, except those
units identified in paragraph (l)(2) of this AD:
Inspect within the next 2,000 flight cycles
since the last inspection required by
paragraph (h) of this AD, or within 4 months
after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs later.
(2) For new MLG main fittings and MLG
main fittings on which both bores have been
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
37905
repaired (reworked) in accordance with
paragraph (h) of this AD: Inspect within
4,000 flight cycles since new (installation) or
repaired (rework) in accordance with
paragraph (h) of this AD, as applicable.
(3) For all MLGs: Repeat the eddy current
inspection thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 2,000 flight cycles.
Exception to Service Bulletin F100–32–111
(m) Although Messier-Dowty Service
Bulletin F100–32–111, including Appendices
A through C and excluding Appendix D,
dated December 20, 2005, specifies to submit
certain information to the manufacturer, this
AD does not include that requirement.
Parts Installation
(n) As of the effective date of this AD, no
person may install, on any airplane, a
Messier-Dowty MLG, unless it has been
inspected and reworked in accordance with
paragraph (l) of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(o) The Manager, International Branch,
ANM–116, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Tom Rodriguez,
Aerospace Engineer, International Branch,
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425)
227–1137; fax (425) 227–1149. Before using
any approved AMOC on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify your
appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the
FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO),
or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
Related Information
(p) The Civil Aviation Authority—The
Netherlands airworthiness directive NL–
2006–003, dated February 7, 2006, also
addresses the subject of this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 24,
2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–14976 Filed 7–1–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2008–0716; Airspace
Docket No. 08–ASW–9]
RIN 2120–AA66
Proposed Establishment of Low
Altitude Area Navigation Route (TRoute); Houston, TX
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\02JYP1.SGM
02JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 128 (Wednesday, July 2, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 37903-37905]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-14976]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2008-0675; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-192-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Fokker Model F.28 Mark 0070 and Mark
0100 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to supersede an existing airworthiness
directive (AD) that applies to certain Fokker Model F.28 Mark 0070 and
0100 airplanes. The existing AD currently requires a one-time
inspection of the main landing gear (MLG) main fitting for cracks, and
repair if necessary. The existing AD also currently requires installing
a placard and revising the airplane flight manual to include procedures
to prohibit the application of brakes during backward movement of the
airplane. This proposed AD would require repetitive eddy current
inspections of the MLG main fitting and rework before further flight as
applicable. This proposed AD results from reports that a final solution
eliminating the cause of the crack initiation mechanism is not yet
available and that repetitive inspections are necessary. We are
proposing this AD to detect and correct cracks in the MLG main fitting,
which could result in reduced structural integrity of the MLG main
fitting.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by August 1, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this AD, contact Fokker
Services B.V., Technical Services Dept., P.O. Box 231, 2150 AE Nieuw-
Vennep, the Netherlands.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (telephone 800-647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1137; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2008-0675;
Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-192-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
[[Page 37904]]
Discussion
On March 10, 2006, we issued AD 2006-06-07, amendment 39-14516 (71
FR 14363, March 22, 2006), for certain Fokker Model F.28 Mark 0070 and
Mark 0100 airplanes. That AD requires inspecting the main landing gear
(MLG) main fitting for cracks, and repairing if necessary. That AD also
requires installing a placard and revising the airplane flight manual
to include procedures to prohibit the application of brakes during
backward movement of the airplane. That AD resulted from a report that
an MLG main fitting failed on an airplane that was braking while moving
backward. We issued that AD to detect and correct cracks in the MLG
main fitting, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the
MLG main fitting.
Actions Since Existing AD Was Issued
Since we issued AD 2006-06-07, we received reports from The Civil
Aviation Authority--The Netherlands (CAA-NL), which is the
airworthiness authority for the Netherlands, that a final solution
eliminating the cause of the crack initiation mechanism is not yet
available. Therefore, the inspection required by AD 2006-06-07 must now
be done repetitively, until a final solution is developed to adequately
address the identified unsafe condition of this AD.
Relevant Service Information
Messier-Dowty has issued Service Bulletin F100-32-111, dated
December 20, 2005. The service bulletin describes procedures for doing
a repetitive eddy current inspection of the MLG main fitting for
cracks, and reworking the MLG main fitting as applicable. Accomplishing
the actions specified in the service information is intended to
adequately address the unsafe condition. The CAA-NL mandated the
service information and issued airworthiness directive NL-2006-003,
dated February 7, 2006, to ensure the continued airworthiness of these
airplanes in the Netherlands.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD
These airplanes are manufactured in the Netherlands and are type
certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of
section 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and
the applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement. Pursuant to this
bilateral airworthiness agreement, the CAA-NL has kept the FAA informed
of the situation described above. We have examined the CAA-NL's
findings, evaluated all pertinent information, and determined that AD
action is necessary for airplanes of this type design that are
certificated for operation in the United States.
This proposed AD would supersede AD 2006-06-07 and would retain the
requirements of the existing AD. This proposed AD would also require
accomplishing the actions specified in the service information
described previously, except as discussed under ``Differences Between
the Proposed AD and the Service Bulletin.''
Differences Between the Proposed AD and the Service Bulletin
Operators should note that, unlike the procedures described in the
referenced Messier-Dowty Service Bulletin F100-32-111, dated December
20, 2005, the proposed AD would not permit further flight with any
cracks in the MLG main fitting. Due to the safety implications and
consequences of such cracking operators must repair all cracked MGL
main fittings before further flight.
Costs of Compliance
The following table provides the estimated costs for U.S. operators
to comply with this proposed AD.
Estimated Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of U.S.-
Action Work Average labor Parts Cost per registered Fleet cost
hours rate per hour airplane airplanes
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection (required by AD 2006-06-07)...... 2 $80 None........................... $160 11 $1,760
AFM Revision and Placard Installation 1 80 None........................... 80 11 880
(required by AD 2006-06-07).
Inspection (new proposed action)............ 6 80 $540 ($270 per fitting)........ 1,020 12 12,240
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the
ADDRESSES section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
[[Page 37905]]
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends Sec. 39.13 by
removing amendment 39-14516 (71 FR 14363, March 22, 2006) and adding
the following new airworthiness directive (AD):
Fokker: Docket No. FAA-2008-0675; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-
192-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by August 1,
2008.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD supersedes AD 2006-06-07.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Fokker Model F.28 Mark 0070 and Mark 0100
airplanes, certificated in any category, equipped with Messier-Dowty
main landing gears (MLGs).
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from reports that a final solution
eliminating the cause of the crack initiation mechanism is not yet
available. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct cracks in
the main landing gear (MLG) main fitting, which could result in
reduced structural integrity of the MLG main fitting.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Restatement of Requirements of AD 2006-06-07
Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) Revision and Placard Installation
(f) Within 14 days after April 26, 2006 (the effective date of
AD 2006-06-07), amend the Limitations section of the Fokker F.28 AFM
to prohibit application of brakes during backward movement of the
airplane. This may be done by inserting a copy of this AD in the
AFM.
Note 1: When a statement to prohibit application of brakes
during backward movement of the airplane has been included in the
general revisions of the AFM, the general revisions may be inserted
into the AFM, and the copy of this AD may be removed from the AFM.
(g) Within 14 days after April 26, 2006, affix a placard on the
pedestal, next to the parking brake handle, having the following
wording: ``APPLICATION OF BRAKES DURING BACKWARD MOVEMENT IS
PROHIBITED.''
Inspection and Corrective Action
(h) At the applicable time specified in paragraph (h)(1) or
(h)(2) of this AD: Do an eddy current inspection of the MLG main
fittings and repair before further flight as applicable, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Messier-Dowty
Service Bulletin F100-32-106, including Appendices A through C and
excluding Appendix D, dated February 18, 2005, except as provided by
paragraphs (i) and (j) of this AD.
(1) For airplanes on which an inspection has not been done in
accordance with Messier-Dowty Service Bulletin F100-32-104, Revision
2, dated October 30, 2003: Within 3 months after April 26, 2006.
(2) For airplanes on which an inspection has been done in
accordance with Messier-Dowty Service Bulletin F100-32-104, Revision
2, dated October 30, 2003: Within 2,000 flight cycles since the last
inspection done in accordance with the service bulletin or within 3
months after April 26, 2006, whichever occurs later.
Exceptions to the Service Bulletin
(i) Where Messier-Dowty Service Bulletin F100-32-106, including
Appendices A through C and excluding Appendix D, dated February 18,
2005, specifies contacting the manufacturer for repair: Before
further flight, repair using a method approved by either the
Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA; or the Civil Aviation Authority--The Netherlands
(CAA-NL) (or its delegated agent).
(j) Although Messier-Dowty Service Bulletin F100-32-106,
including Appendices A through C and excluding Appendix D, dated
February 18, 2005, specifies to submit certain information to the
manufacturer, this AD does not include that requirement.
Parts Installation
(k) As of April 26, 2006, and until the effective date of this
AD, no person may install, on any airplane, a Messier-Dowty MLG,
unless it has been inspected/repaired according to paragraph (h) of
this AD.
New Requirements of This AD
Inspection and Repair
(l) At the applicable times specified in paragraphs (l)(1),
(l)(2), and (l)(3) of this AD: Do an eddy current inspection of the
MLG main fitting for cracks, and rework the MLG main fitting if
applicable, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Messier-Dowty Service Bulletin F100-32-111, including Appendices A
through C and excluding Appendix D, dated December 20, 2005; except
as provided by paragraph (m) of this AD. The rework must be done
before further flight.
(1) For all MLG main fittings, except those units identified in
paragraph (l)(2) of this AD: Inspect within the next 2,000 flight
cycles since the last inspection required by paragraph (h) of this
AD, or within 4 months after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later.
(2) For new MLG main fittings and MLG main fittings on which
both bores have been repaired (reworked) in accordance with
paragraph (h) of this AD: Inspect within 4,000 flight cycles since
new (installation) or repaired (rework) in accordance with paragraph
(h) of this AD, as applicable.
(3) For all MLGs: Repeat the eddy current inspection thereafter
at intervals not to exceed 2,000 flight cycles.
Exception to Service Bulletin F100-32-111
(m) Although Messier-Dowty Service Bulletin F100-32-111,
including Appendices A through C and excluding Appendix D, dated
December 20, 2005, specifies to submit certain information to the
manufacturer, this AD does not include that requirement.
Parts Installation
(n) As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install,
on any airplane, a Messier-Dowty MLG, unless it has been inspected
and reworked in accordance with paragraph (l) of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(o) The Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Tom
Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-1137; fax (425) 227-1149.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
Related Information
(p) The Civil Aviation Authority--The Netherlands airworthiness
directive NL-2006-003, dated February 7, 2006, also addresses the
subject of this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 24, 2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.11
[FR Doc. E8-14976 Filed 7-1-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P