Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Potomac River, Oxon Hill, MD and Alexandria, VA, 37806-37808 [E8-14954]
Download as PDF
37806
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 2, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
regulatory action as defined in
Executive Order 12866. Therefore, a
regulatory assessment is not required. It
also has been determined that section
553(b) of the Administrative Procedure
Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply
to these regulations because they are
interpretive regulations. Because these
regulations are necessary to provide tax
return preparers and taxpayers with
immediate guidance on the application
of the section 7216 rules regarding SSN
masking requirements, particularly in
light of the January 1, 2009 applicability
date provided by the recently
promulgated section 7216 regulations
contained in TD 9375, and as these
regulations are intended to provide a
limited exception to, and relief from, the
rule requiring SSN masking in all
instances where tax return information
is disclosed to a tax return preparer
located outside of the United States and
its territories and possessions, good
cause would otherwise exist for
dispensing with notice and public
comment pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)
and (c). For applicability of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
chapter 6), refer to the Special Analyses
section of the preamble to the crossreferenced notice of proposed
rulemaking published in the Proposed
Rules section of this issue of the Federal
Register. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of
the Internal Revenue Code, these
temporary regulations have been
submitted to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration for comment on their
impact on small business.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these
regulations is Lawrence E. Mack, Office
of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Procedure and Administration).
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 301
Employment taxes, Estate taxes,
Excise taxes, Gift taxes, Income taxes,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 301 is
amended as follows:
I
PART 301—PROCEDURE AND
ADMINISTRATION
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 301 is amended by adding an
entry in numerical order to read as
follows:
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
I
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805. * * *
Section 301.7216–3T also issued under 26
U.S.C. 7216. * * *
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:12 Jul 01, 2008
Jkt 214001
I Par. 2. Section 301.7216–3 is
amended by revising paragraph (b)(4) to
read as follows:
§ 301.7216–3 Disclosure or use permitted
only with the taxpayer’s consent.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(4) [Reserved]. For further guidance,
see § 301.7216–3T(b)(4).
*
*
*
*
*
I Par. 3. Section 301.7216–3T is added
to read as follows:
§ 301.7216–3T Disclosure or use permitted
only with the taxpayer’s consent
(temporary).
(a) [Reserved]. For further guidance,
see § 301.7216–3(a).
(b) Timing requirements and
limitations—(1) through (3) [Reserved].
For further guidance, see § 301.7216–
3(b)(1) through (3).
(4) No consent to the disclosure of a
taxpayer’s social security number to a
return preparer outside of the United
States with respect to a taxpayers filing
a return in the Form 1040 Series—(i) In
general. Except as provided in
paragraph (ii) of this section, a tax
return preparer located within the
United States, including any territory or
possession of the United States, may not
obtain consent to disclose the taxpayer’s
social security number (SSN) with
respect to taxpayers filing a return in the
Form 1040 Series, for example, Form
1040, Form 1040NR, Form 1040A, or
Form 1040EZ, to a tax return preparer
located outside of the United States or
any territory or possession of the United
States. Thus, if a tax return preparer
located within the United States
(including any territory or possession of
the United States) obtains consent from
an individual taxpayer to disclose tax
return information to another tax return
preparer located outside of the United
States, as provided under §§ 301.7216–
2(c) and 301.7216–2(d), the tax return
preparer located in the United States
may not disclose the taxpayer’s SSN,
and the tax return preparer must redact
or otherwise mask the taxpayer’s SSN
before the tax return information is
disclosed outside of the United States.
If a tax return preparer located within
the United States initially receives or
obtains a taxpayer’s SSN from another
tax return preparer located outside of
the United States, however, the tax
return preparer within the United States
may, without consent, retransmit the
taxpayer’s SSN to the tax return
preparer located outside the United
States that initially provided the SSN to
the tax return preparer located within
the United States. For purposes of this
section, a tax return preparer located
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
outside of the United States does not
include a tax return preparer who is
continuously and regularly employed in
the United States or any territory or
possession of the United States and who
is in a temporary travel status outside of
the United States.
(ii) Exception. A tax return preparer
located within the United States,
including any territory or possession of
the United States, may obtain consent to
disclose the taxpayer’s SSN to a tax
return preparer located outside of the
United States or any territory or
possession of the United States where
the tax return preparer within the
United States discloses the SSN to a tax
return preparer outside of the United
States through the use of an adequate
data protection safeguard as defined by
the Secretary in guidance published in
the Internal Revenue Bulletin (see
§ 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b) of this chapter) and
verifies the maintenance of the adequate
data protection safeguards in the request
for the taxpayer’s consent pursuant to
the specifications described by the
Secretary in guidance published in the
Internal Revenue Bulletin.
(b)(5) and (c) [Reserved]. For further
guidance, see § 301.7216–3(b)(5) and (c).
(d) Effective/applicability date. This
section applies to disclosures or uses of
tax return information occurring on or
after January 1, 2009. The applicability
of this section expires on or before
January 1, 2012.
Linda E. Stiff,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
Approved: June 25, 2008.
Eric Solomon,
Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax
Policy).
[FR Doc. E8–15046 Filed 7–1–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[USCG–2008–0207]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations;
Potomac River, Oxon Hill, MD and
Alexandria, VA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
temporarily changing the regulations
governing the operation of the new
E:\FR\FM\02JYR1.SGM
02JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 2, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Woodrow Wilson Memorial (I–95)
Bridge, mile 103.8, across Potomac
River between Alexandria, Virginia and
Oxon Hill, Maryland. This action is
necessary to finalize construction of the
drawbridge.
DATES: This temporary rule is effective
from July 2, 2008 to March 1, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Comments and related
materials received from the public, as
well as documents mentioned in this
preamble as being available in the
docket, are part of docket USCG–2008–
0207 and are available online at
https://www.regulations.gov. This
material is also available for inspection
or copying at two locations: the Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays and the
Commander (dpb), Fifth Coast Guard
District, Federal Building, 1st Floor, 431
Crawford Street, Portsmouth, VA
23704–5004 between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call
Waverly W. Gregory, Jr., Bridge
Administrator, Fifth Coast Guard
District, at (757) 398–6222. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
On April 18, 2008, we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled ‘‘Drawbridge Operation
Regulations; Potomac River, Oxon Hill,
MD and Alexandria, VA’’ in the Federal
Register (73 FR 21090). We received two
e-mails commenting on the proposed
rule. No public meeting was requested,
and none was held.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective in less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. While construction continues,
this rule will allow the drawbridge to
remain closed-to-navigation each day
from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. until and
including March 1, 2009.
Federal Register (73 FR 13127), which
ended on May 30, 2008.
The Maryland State Highway
Administration and the Virginia
Department of Transportation, coowners of the drawbridge, requested an
extension of the aforementioned
temporary deviation for a longer period
of time in an effort to minimize the
potential for major regional traffic
impacts and consequences during
bridge openings while construction
continues. Bridge owners requested that
the drawbridge not be available for
openings for vessels each day between
the hours of 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. through
Sunday, March 1, 2009 or until the
bridge is properly commissioned,
whichever comes first. Construction
will continue during this time period
and the normal vehicular traffic pattern
with five lanes operating in each
direction is not anticipated until near
the end of the time period.
From a river-user standpoint, the
coordinators for the construction of the
new Woodrow Wilson Bridge Project
have received no requests from boaters
or mariners to open during the 10 a.m.
to 2 p.m. timeframe since the first
temporary deviation was issued in late
June 2006. In fact, no requests have been
received for an opening of the new
bridge at all since July 3, 2006. Finally,
the coordinators have received no
complaints on the 10 a.m. to 2 p.m.
restriction. This temporary rule will
affect only vessels with mast heights of
75 feet or greater. Furthermore, all
operators of affected vessels with mast
heights greater than 75 feet will be able
to request an opening of the drawbridge
in the ‘‘off-peak’’ vehicle traffic hours
(evening and overnight) in accordance
with 33 CFR 117.255(a).
Background and Purpose
Discussion of Comments and Changes
The Coast Guard received two
comments by e-mail to the NPRM. One
respondent stated that this temporary
change of the regulation will have
minimal effect on their Potomac River
operation and the delivery of the jet fuel
barge can be scheduled around the daily
planned closure.
The other respondent indicated that
their tugs did not need to open the
drawbridge; the vertical clearance is
sufficient and did not foresee any issues
as long as they can still use the channel.
Based on the comments received, we
are issuing a temporary rule without
substantive change from the NPRM.
On March 5, 2008, we published a
notice of temporary deviation from the
regulations entitled ‘‘Drawbridge
Operation Regulations; Potomac River,
Between Maryland and Virginia’’ in the
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is temporarily
amending 33 CFR § 117.255 by inserting
new paragraphs (a)(2)(iii) and (a)(4)(iv),
which allow the draw of the Woodrow
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:12 Jul 01, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
37807
Wilson Memorial (I–95) Bridge, at mile
103.8, between Alexandria, Virginia and
Oxon Hill, Maryland to remain closed
between 10 a.m. and 2 p.m. through
March 1, 2009.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. We reached this conclusion
based on the fact that this temporary
change will have only a minimal impact
on maritime traffic transiting the bridge.
All operators of affected vessels with
mast heights greater than 75 feet will be
able to request an opening of the
drawbridge in the ‘‘off-peak’’ vehicle
traffic hours (evening and overnight) in
accordance with 33 CFR 117.255(a), and
mariners can plan their trips in
accordance with the scheduled bridge
openings to minimize delays.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities because the
rule only adds minimal restrictions to
the movement of navigation, all
operators of affected vessels with mast
heights greater than 75 feet will be able
to request an opening of the drawbridge
in the ‘‘off-peak’’ vehicle traffic hours
(evening and overnight) in accordance
with 33 CFR 117.255(a), and mariners
who plan their transits in accordance
with the scheduled bridge openings can
minimize delay.
E:\FR\FM\02JYR1.SGM
02JYR1
37808
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 2, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Assistance for Small Entities
Civil Justice Reform
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offered to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they
could better evaluate its effects on them
and participate in the rulemaking
process. Small businesses may send
comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise
determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and
Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement
Ombudsman and the Regional Small
Business Regulatory Fairness Boards.
The Ombudsman evaluates these
actions annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520.).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:12 Jul 01, 2008
Jkt 214001
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
would not create an environmental risk
to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD
and Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1, which
guides the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–
4370f), and have concluded that there
are no factors in this case that would
limit the use of a categorical exclusion
under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(32)(e) of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation.
Under figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of
the Instruction, an environmental
analysis checklist and a categorical
exclusion determination are not
required for this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 117 as follows:
I
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
PO 00000
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Sfmt 4700
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. From July 2, 2008 to March 1, 2009,
in § 117.255 add new paragraphs
(a)(2)(iii) and (a)(4)(iv) to read as
follows:
I
§ 117.255
Potomac River.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(iii) From July 2, 2008 to March 1,
2009, from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m., the draw
need not be opened.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) * * *
(iv) From July 2, 2008 to March 1,
2009, from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m., the draw
need not be opened.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: June 19, 2008.
Fred M. Rosa, Jr.,
Rear Admiral, United States Coast Guard,
Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E8–14954 Filed 7–1–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
E:\FR\FM\02JYR1.SGM
02JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 128 (Wednesday, July 2, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 37806-37808]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-14954]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[USCG-2008-0207]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Potomac River, Oxon Hill, MD
and Alexandria, VA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is temporarily changing the regulations
governing the operation of the new
[[Page 37807]]
Woodrow Wilson Memorial (I-95) Bridge, mile 103.8, across Potomac River
between Alexandria, Virginia and Oxon Hill, Maryland. This action is
necessary to finalize construction of the drawbridge.
DATES: This temporary rule is effective from July 2, 2008 to March 1,
2009.
ADDRESSES: Comments and related materials received from the public, as
well as documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the
docket, are part of docket USCG-2008-0207 and are available online at
https://www.regulations.gov. This material is also available for
inspection or copying at two locations: the Docket Management Facility
(M-30), U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays and the Commander (dpb), Fifth Coast Guard District, Federal
Building, 1st Floor, 431 Crawford Street, Portsmouth, VA 23704-5004
between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call Waverly W. Gregory, Jr., Bridge Administrator, Fifth Coast Guard
District, at (757) 398-6222. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On April 18, 2008, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled ``Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Potomac River, Oxon
Hill, MD and Alexandria, VA'' in the Federal Register (73 FR 21090). We
received two e-mails commenting on the proposed rule. No public meeting
was requested, and none was held.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective in less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. While construction continues, this
rule will allow the drawbridge to remain closed-to-navigation each day
from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. until and including March 1, 2009.
Background and Purpose
On March 5, 2008, we published a notice of temporary deviation from
the regulations entitled ``Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Potomac
River, Between Maryland and Virginia'' in the Federal Register (73 FR
13127), which ended on May 30, 2008.
The Maryland State Highway Administration and the Virginia
Department of Transportation, co-owners of the drawbridge, requested an
extension of the aforementioned temporary deviation for a longer period
of time in an effort to minimize the potential for major regional
traffic impacts and consequences during bridge openings while
construction continues. Bridge owners requested that the drawbridge not
be available for openings for vessels each day between the hours of 10
a.m. to 2 p.m. through Sunday, March 1, 2009 or until the bridge is
properly commissioned, whichever comes first. Construction will
continue during this time period and the normal vehicular traffic
pattern with five lanes operating in each direction is not anticipated
until near the end of the time period.
From a river-user standpoint, the coordinators for the construction
of the new Woodrow Wilson Bridge Project have received no requests from
boaters or mariners to open during the 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. timeframe
since the first temporary deviation was issued in late June 2006. In
fact, no requests have been received for an opening of the new bridge
at all since July 3, 2006. Finally, the coordinators have received no
complaints on the 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. restriction. This temporary rule
will affect only vessels with mast heights of 75 feet or greater.
Furthermore, all operators of affected vessels with mast heights
greater than 75 feet will be able to request an opening of the
drawbridge in the ``off-peak'' vehicle traffic hours (evening and
overnight) in accordance with 33 CFR 117.255(a).
Discussion of Comments and Changes
The Coast Guard received two comments by e-mail to the NPRM. One
respondent stated that this temporary change of the regulation will
have minimal effect on their Potomac River operation and the delivery
of the jet fuel barge can be scheduled around the daily planned
closure.
The other respondent indicated that their tugs did not need to open
the drawbridge; the vertical clearance is sufficient and did not
foresee any issues as long as they can still use the channel.
Based on the comments received, we are issuing a temporary rule
without substantive change from the NPRM.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is temporarily amending 33 CFR Sec. 117.255 by
inserting new paragraphs (a)(2)(iii) and (a)(4)(iv), which allow the
draw of the Woodrow Wilson Memorial (I-95) Bridge, at mile 103.8,
between Alexandria, Virginia and Oxon Hill, Maryland to remain closed
between 10 a.m. and 2 p.m. through March 1, 2009.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. We reached this conclusion based on the
fact that this temporary change will have only a minimal impact on
maritime traffic transiting the bridge. All operators of affected
vessels with mast heights greater than 75 feet will be able to request
an opening of the drawbridge in the ``off-peak'' vehicle traffic hours
(evening and overnight) in accordance with 33 CFR 117.255(a), and
mariners can plan their trips in accordance with the scheduled bridge
openings to minimize delays.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities because the rule only adds minimal
restrictions to the movement of navigation, all operators of affected
vessels with mast heights greater than 75 feet will be able to request
an opening of the drawbridge in the ``off-peak'' vehicle traffic hours
(evening and overnight) in accordance with 33 CFR 117.255(a), and
mariners who plan their transits in accordance with the scheduled
bridge openings can minimize delay.
[[Page 37808]]
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they could better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process. Small
businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees who
enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and
the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman
evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness
to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of
the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard
will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD
and Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 5100.1, which
guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
that there are no factors in this case that would limit the use of a
categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1,
paragraph (32)(e) of the Instruction, from further environmental
documentation.
Under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction, an
environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are not required for this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. From July 2, 2008 to March 1, 2009, in Sec. 117.255 add new
paragraphs (a)(2)(iii) and (a)(4)(iv) to read as follows:
Sec. 117.255 Potomac River.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(iii) From July 2, 2008 to March 1, 2009, from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m.,
the draw need not be opened.
* * * * *
(4) * * *
(iv) From July 2, 2008 to March 1, 2009, from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m.,
the draw need not be opened.
* * * * *
Dated: June 19, 2008.
Fred M. Rosa, Jr.,
Rear Admiral, United States Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. E8-14954 Filed 7-1-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P