Record of Decision: United States Implementing Organization's Participation in the Integrated Ocean Drilling Program, 36919-36933 [E8-14772]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 126 / Monday, June 30, 2008 / Notices
RETENTION AND DISPOSAL:
Records pertaining to unsuccessful
applicants are shredded. Records
pertaining to recipients are maintained
permanently at the Endowment.
SYSTEM MANAGER(S) AND ADDRESS:
POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR STORING,
RETRIEVING, ACCESSING, RETAINING, AND
DISPOSING OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:
STORAGE:
All records in this system are
maintained in paper format in locked
file cabinets.
Division Coordinator; Literature
Division, National Endowment for the
Arts, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20506.
RETRIEVABILITY:
NOTIFICATION PROCEDURE:
SAFEGUARDS:
Records in this system are retrieved
by name of nominee or by name of
recipient.
Records in this system are maintained
in a locked file cabinet located within
an office that is kept locked during nonbusiness hours.
See 45 CFR Part 1159.
RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES:
See 45 CFR Part 1159.
RETENTION AND DISPOSAL:
CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES:
Data in this system is obtained from
individuals covered by the system.
Records pertaining to nominees are
maintained for five years. After five
years have passed, nominee records are
shredded. Records pertaining to
recipients are maintained permanently
at the Endowment.
EXEMPTIONS CLAIMED FOR THE SYSTEM:
SYSTEM MANAGER(S) AND ADDRESS:
See 45 CFR Part 1159.
RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES:
Division Coordinator; Arts Education/
Music/Opera/Presenting Division,
National Endowment for the Arts, 1100
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20506.
None.
NEA–19
SYSTEM NAME:
Opera Honor Award Recipients.
NOTIFICATION PROCEDURE:
See 45 CFR Part 1159.
SYSTEM LOCATION:
Arts Education/Music/Opera/
Presenting Division, 1100 Pennsylvania
Avenue, NW., Suite 703, Washington,
DC 20506.
RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES:
CATEGORIES OF INDIVIDUALS COVERED BY THE
SYSTEM:
RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES:
Individuals nominated to receive an
Opera Honor Award from the
Endowment and recipients of the award.
CATEGORIES OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:
See 45 CFR Part 1159.
CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES:
See 45 CFR Part 1159.
Data in this system is obtained from
individuals covered by the system.
EXEMPTIONS CLAIMED FOR THE SYSTEM:
None.
Name, address, telephone number,
biographical information.
AUTHORITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM:
Kathleen Edwards,
Director, Administrative Services, National
Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. E8–14680 Filed 6–27–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537–01–P
National Foundation on the Arts and
the Humanities Act of 1965, as amended
(20 U.S.C. 951 et seq.).
PURPOSE:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
To create a central repository for
information about individuals who have
been nominated to receive an Opera
Honor Award and to create a record of
Opera Honor Award recipients.
ROUTINE USES:
Information in this system is used to
compile nominee packages for review
by a panel in selecting the recipients of
the Opera Honor Awards.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:15 Jun 27, 2008
Jkt 214001
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Record of Decision: United States
Implementing Organization’s
Participation in the Integrated Ocean
Drilling Program
National Science Foundation.
Record of Decision: United
States Implementing Organization’s
Participation in the Integrated Ocean
Drilling Program
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Dr.
James Allan, Program Director, Ocean
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36919
Drilling Program, Division of Ocean
Sciences, National Science Foundation,
4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 725,
Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703)
292–8581. E-mail: jallan@nsf.gov.
SUMMARY: The National Science
Foundation (NSF) has decided to
proceed with funding the United States
Implementing Organization’s (USIO)
participation in the Integrated Ocean
Drilling Program (IODP), an
international research program that
explores the history and structure of the
earth as recorded in seafloor sediments,
fluids, and rocks. The planned action
will result in the United States
providing and operating a light, riserless
drilling vessel, the modernized and
retrofitted JOIDES Resolution, also
referred to as the Scientific Ocean
Drilling Vessel (SODV). The Consortium
for Ocean Leadership, Inc. (COL) and its
partners, Lamont-Doherty Earth
Observatory of Columbia University
(LDEO) and Texas A&M University
(TAMU) through the Texas A&M
Research Foundation (TAMRF) have
been selected by NSF to be the IODP–
USIO for the light drilling vessel and
related activities.
Alternative B has been selected as the
preferred alternative. In reaching this
decision, the Director of the NSF Ocean
Drilling Program has considered the
potential environmental impacts
addressed in the Programmatic
Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS)
for proposed IODP–USIO activities. The
National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS), a part of the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration
(NOAA), was a cooperating agency in
the preparation of the PEIS. The
Director has also sought input from
Federal agencies, research institutions,
private organizations, and individuals.
A Notice of Availability for public
review of the draft PEIS was published
in the Federal Register and copies of the
document were made available for
review to all interested parties including
international and U.S. Federal agencies,
research institutions, private
organizations, and individuals. Two
public meetings were conducted. No
comments were received.
NSF will distribute this Record of
Decision (ROD) to all known interested
and affected persons and agencies and
will publish a notice of its availability
in the Federal Register.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Decision
Background
The NSF proposes to fund the USIO’s
participation in the IODP, which
involves the operation of a light,
E:\FR\FM\30JNN1.SGM
30JNN1
36920
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 126 / Monday, June 30, 2008 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
riserless drilling vessel, the JOIDES
Resolution (SODV) and the performance
of related activities to support earth
sciences research throughout the
world’s oceans where riserless drilling
is optimally suited. Proposed activities
to be conducted by the JOIDES
Resolution include the mechanical
operation of the vessel, riserless ocean
drilling, core sampling, and onboard
research activities.
The IODP is an integrated, multidrilling platform scientific research
program with objectives identified in
the IODP Science Plan (ISP), which
provides fundamental guidance as to the
scientific and technical objectives. IODP
studies will lead to a better
understanding of the deep biosphere
and the sub-seafloor ocean;
environmental change, processes, and
impacts; and solid earth cycles and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:15 Jun 27, 2008
Jkt 214001
geodynamics. The specific IODP initial
drilling initiatives require the IODP to
deploy closely linked drilling platform
types simultaneously. A riserless
drillship such as the JOIDES Resolution
will enable the IODP to reach the
ocean’s greatest depths more effectively
than the other two available drilling
IODP platforms. Additionally, the
JOIDES Resolution will serve as a stateof-the-art riserless drilling research
platform that is critical for achieving the
program’s scientific goals, particularly
as IODP drilling progresses into harsher
environments, where the challenge of
recovering biologically, chemically and
physically intact samples continues to
increase.
Alternatives Considered
The PEIS focused on the evaluation of
all SODV operations and research
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
activities independent of specific
geographic locations and considered the
following alternatives:
Alternative A—Conduct Riserless Ocean
Drilling Based Solely on Scientific
Research Needs
In Alternative A, riserless ocean
drilling expeditions would be designed
and conducted to meet site-specific
scientific objectives as developed by the
proponents of the research. In this
alternative, the primary focus during the
planning and implementation of
riserless drilling expeditions would be
on achieving the proposed scientific
objectives and avoiding unsafe working
conditions. Figure 1 identifies the
process features and the environmental
components of this alternative.
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
E:\FR\FM\30JNN1.SGM
30JNN1
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:02 Jun 27, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\30JNN1.SGM
30JNN1
36921
EN30JN08.024
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 126 / Monday, June 30, 2008 / Notices
36922
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 126 / Monday, June 30, 2008 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
In this alternative, TAMU and LDEO,
the IODP–USIO’s science support
contractors, would maintain a distinct,
independent panel of safety experts
(Safety Panel) to advise the USIO on
safety issues and drilling hazards. The
Safety Panel would review all sitespecific data pertaining to each
expedition and render a final decision
regarding site safety. No additional
review and advisory support would be
provided such as guidance from the
IODP.
Prior to each expedition, a detailed
Scientific Prospectus would be prepared
by key operations and research
personnel which reflects the agreed
upon priorities and implementation
strategies for each expedition. The Site
Survey Package consisting of data
required for an expedition would be
published in the Scientific Prospectus.
The Expedition Safety Package would
then be prepared which would be a
collection of all data and documentation
(including the Site Survey Package)
necessary to support a safe and
environmentally compliant operation.
Both the Site Safety and the Expedition
Safety Packages would contain pertinent
information on the potential geological
or environmental hazards that would be
used to determine appropriate
contingencies during drilling.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:02 Jun 27, 2008
Jkt 214001
Prior to the vessel departure, the
IODP–USIO would obtain necessary
approvals for the areas in which the
vessel would operate including permits
and other regulatory notifications. In
parallel, the vessel operator (ODL/
Transocean) would ensure that vessel
systems such as engines, incinerators,
and wastewater treatment devices are
functioning properly per regulatory
requirements (e.g., MARPOL).
Alternative B—Conduct Riserless Ocean
Drilling Based on Specific Scientific
Research Needs and IODP Support
In Alternative B, riserless ocean
drilling expeditions would be designed
and conducted to meet site-specific
scientific objectives as presented by the
proponents of the research and would
incorporate advisory input from the
IODP as well as the USIO’s Safety Panel
guidance as described in Alternative A.
In this alternative, the value of the
potential scientific results of any
drilling proposal would be balanced
against the possible hazards so that
IODP–USIO riserless operations can
achieve valuable scientific results
without jeopardizing the health of
individuals, the environment, or the
future of the program. Figure 2 depicts
the combined IODP and USIO review
processes which would be used to select
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
safe drilling locations and methods and
identify site-specific environmental
conditions that could be adversely
affected by riserless drilling activities
before an expedition is included in the
drilling program.
Proposals and associated data
packages would then be reviewed by the
Environmental Protection and Safety
Panel (EPSP), an advisory panel
comprised of multi-disciplinary experts
drawn from industry, government, and
academia to provide independent
advice to IODP regarding potential
safety and environmental hazards that
may exist because of general or specific
geology of the seafloor, as a
consequence of human activities, or the
potential impact on the marine life and
their environment. During the EPSP
review process, a representative
proponent would make a presentation
consisting of a project overview
followed by an appraisal of each
proposed drill site and a description of
the key safety and environmental issues.
The purpose of the presentation would
be to provide the panel with
information on the proposed drilling
activities, environmental conditions at
each drill site, and other site-specific
features that would allow the panel to
identify operational hazards and
potential environmental impacts.
E:\FR\FM\30JNN1.SGM
30JNN1
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:15 Jun 27, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\30JNN1.SGM
30JNN1
36923
EN30JN08.025
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 126 / Monday, June 30, 2008 / Notices
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 126 / Monday, June 30, 2008 / Notices
Following their review, the EPSP
would provide guidance on site
selection and data processing to
improve imaging of the sites, and on
modification of site locations, so that
the proposed sites would be safe to drill
and will meet the scientific objectives.
Final EPSP recommendations for each
site may include approval as requested,
approval with conditions regarding drill
sites, drilling order, depths, associated
monitoring requirements, or sitespecific mitigating measures. In concert
with EPSP advice, the IODP–USIO
Safety Panel would review all sitespecific data pertaining to a particular
expedition and render a final decision
regarding site safety.
Prior to each expedition, a detailed
Scientific Prospectus would be prepared
by key operations and research
personnel which reflects the agreed
upon priorities and implementation
strategies for each expedition. The Site
Survey Package consisting of data
required for an expedition would be
published in the Scientific Prospectus.
The Expedition Safety Package would
then be prepared which would be a
collection of all data and documentation
(including the Site Survey Package)
necessary to support a safe and
environmentally compliant operation.
Both the Site Safety and the Expedition
Safety Packages would contain pertinent
information on the potential geological
or environmental hazards that would be
used to determine appropriate
contingencies during drilling.
Prior to the vessel departure, the
IODP–USIO would obtain necessary
approvals for the areas in which the
vessel would operate including permits
and other regulatory notifications. In
Alternative B, site-specific
environmental assessments, Incidental
Harassment Authorizations (IHA),
mitigating measures, monitoring
strategies, and contingencies for
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:15 Jun 27, 2008
Jkt 214001
alternate drill sites, would be developed
based on conditions or requirements
identified during the comprehensive
review process, reviewed by the
appropriate authorities, and
incorporated into the operating plan. In
parallel, the vessel operator (ODL/
Transocean) would ensure that vessel
systems such as engines, incinerators,
and wastewater treatment devices are
functioning properly per regulatory
requirements (e.g., MARPOL).
Alternative C—Do Not Conduct Ocean
Drilling (No Action Alternative)
In Alternative C, the IODP–USIO
would not operate the SODV and would
not provide the riserless ocean drilling
capability to the IODP. Unless the
riserless drilling resources are realized
from other sources, the IODP’s goal to
integrate multiple drilling platforms,
exploratory tools, and diverse strategies
to resolve outstanding research
questions as identified in the ISP may
not be achieved. The long-term U.S.
commitment and expertise to support
earth sciences research using riserless
ocean drilling technologies would be
lost.
Preferred Alternative
Alternative B has been selected as the
preferred alternative. As shown in
Figure 2, critical environmental
components will be identified during
the review process and necessary
contingencies and site-specific
mitigating measures planned
accordingly. For example, some
common environmental issues
addressed during IODP reviews include:
• Potential for encountering a
pressurized section of the sub-seafloor
while drilling;
• Indications of active (or previously
active) vent systems or hydrocarbon
seeps in the area of proposed drilling;
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Probability of encountering H2S
(hydrogen sulfide) or hydrates during
coring or core recovery activities;
• Presence of any biological
communities within 100 meters of any
proposed drill sites, their type (e.g.,
vents, deep-water reefs), and evidence
for their existence (e.g., sampling,
visual);
• Presence of a nearby fishery
(species, typical gear), known local
breeding ground, consistent feeding
area, migration route, or habitat to
threatened or endangered species; and
• Availability of alternative sites in
the event that weather, currents, ice,
sensitive biological communities
prevent drilling.
In addition, the site survey data
required as a result of the
comprehensive review process will
characterize the area in the immediate
vicinity (within 1 km) of each proposed
drill site for the purpose of evaluating
seafloor conditions (water depth,
seafloor topography and stability) and
identifying potential hazards and
environmental concerns while allowing
flexibility in the use of alternate drill
sites if unexpected field conditions
prevent drilling at primary locations.
Benefits derived from the collaboration
of USIO riserless drilling planning
efforts and IODP SAS review processes
will effectively contribute to minimizing
adverse environmental impacts and
include:
• Selecting the optimum drilling
platform based upon site-specific
conditions and research objectives;
• Ensuring that site characterization
data is adequate to support the proposed
research objectives and identify
potentially sensitive environmental
conditions for protection;
• Selecting the most appropriate
drilling locations and minimal number
of boreholes to be drilled based on
E:\FR\FM\30JNN1.SGM
30JNN1
EN30JN08.026
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
36924
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 126 / Monday, June 30, 2008 / Notices
research needs and local environmental
conditions;
• Developing plans and procedures to
limit vessel and drilling related
discharges in environmentally sensitive
areas to the minimum needed to support
the intended research; and
• Minimizing the use of acoustic
sources (e.g., transducer-based
equipment, seismic sources) in
environments containing organisms
sensitive to outputs from these sources.
By contrast, the nominal planning and
review process for riserless drilling
expeditions that would be implemented
by selecting Alternative A (i.e., to only
meet proposed scientific objectives and
avoiding unsafe working conditions)
would not provide the mechanisms to
identify sensitive environmental
conditions and avoid potential impacts.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Impacts
The findings of the PEIS indicate that
a majority of the outputs associated with
the performance of the preferred
alternative will have minor and
transitory effects on the environment.
This alternative incorporates the IODP
SAS review and advisory process to
identify potentially sensitive
environments and recommends the use
of best management practices (BMPs)
and site-specific mitigating measures to
reduce environmental outputs
associated with drilling and coring
operations.
A majority of the impacts resulting
from the preferred alternative will be
localized and will disappear once the
vessel completes drilling activities at a
particular site and leaves the area. Many
of the outputs and resulting impacts
associated with the operation of the
SODV such as wastewater discharges,
air emissions, and the propagation of
underwater noise from propulsion
equipment and transducer-based
equipment are common to most
merchant marine vessels. Some outputs
associated with riserless drilling
activities (seafloor disturbance,
deposition of sediment drill cuttings,
deployment of equipment or materials)
may remain evident on the seafloor for
extended periods of time after borehole
drilling is complete; however, the
effects on the benthic environment will
be minor. Further details describing
these impacts of the preferred
alternative are provided below.
Marine Water Quality
The impacts to water quality resulting
from the mechanical operation of the
SODV will include:
• Localized, short-term impacts
resulting from SODV discharges of
treated wastewater, greywater, treated
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:15 Jun 27, 2008
Jkt 214001
bilgewater, deck drainage, ballast water,
and treated lab discharges; and
• Localized disturbances resulting
from mixing of the water column
surrounding the SODV during thruster
operation.
Impacts to water quality associated
with drilling and coring operations and
borehole completion activities will
include:
• Localized effects near a borehole
resulting from the discharge of seawater
drilling fluid, sediment displaced from
the borehole, drilling mud, cement, and
tracers.
Sea Bottom and Sediment Quality
The impacts to the seafloor
environment and sediment quality
resulting from drilling and coring
operations and borehole completion
activities will include:
• Localized disturbances to the
seafloor derived from the installation of
boreholes and the introduction of
naturally occurring drilling muds and
cement;
• Localized deposition of drill
cuttings and drilling mud particles, and
alteration of seafloor topography;
• Displacement or smothering of
benthic organisms in the immediate
vicinity of the borehole; and
• Localized disturbances to the
seafloor derived from the installation of
permanent structures.
Air Quality
The emissions resulting from SODV
operations, including engine exhaust
and incinerator combustion byproducts,
are expected to be transitory and will
not adversely impair local air quality.
Fuel evaporative emissions resulting
from SODV operations are not expected
to be detectable or adversely affect local
air quality. Similarly, emissions from
volatile or gaseous chemicals used
onboard the SODV for operations or in
the laboratories are expected to be
minimal. Because the chemicals are
used on an intermittent basis and in
small quantities, the resulting air
emissions are expected to be minimal.
Acoustic Environment
During transit, sound and vibration
produced by the SODV engines,
propulsion systems, and transducerbased instruments may be noticeable to
nearby marine organisms. It is expected
that many potential receptors will
perceive the continuous noise produced
by the approaching vessel and will
deviate from the path of the vessel
thereby avoiding exposure to peak and
potentially harmful noise levels. For
several reasons, it is unlikely that the
transducer-based equipment on the
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36925
SODV would cause a marine organism
to be exposed to sound levels greater
than the 180 dB re 1 µPa (rms) level
which NMFS considers to be potentially
harmful. First, most sound sources emit
energy in narrowly focused beams
directed toward the seafloor and would
only affect organisms directly beneath
the vessel. Second, at a typical cruising
speed of 11 knots (20 km/hr), it is
expected that if an organism were
exposed to noise from the vessel, it
would only be for a short period of time.
Finally, the short pulse duration from
the transducer devices reduces the risk
of hearing impairment or other injury to
exposed organisms.
The noise created by the SODV while
it is dynamically positioned over a drill
site and the physical turbulence in the
water caused by the vessel’s thrusters
are likely to deter many marine
organisms from approaching the
drillship and becoming exposed to
potentially intense sound levels.
Because most drill sites will be located
in deep open ocean areas that are not
densely populated by marine organisms,
the potential that an individual or a
population of animals may be exposed
to continuous noise levels that could
cause behavioral changes is very low.
Similarly, the short-term increase in
the ambient noise created by vessel
operations or drilling and coring may
deter some organisms from a particular
area, resulting in temporary
displacement and possible disturbance
to an animals’ feeding or spawning
behavior. In general, the SODV will only
occupy a drill site for a relatively short
period of time (i.e., hours or days)
allowing displaced organisms to
repopulate the area when drilling ceases
and the vessel departs.
In most areas where the SODV is
expected to operate, the range of
potential effects to biological receptors
resulting from riserless ocean drilling
operations and related research
activities are expected to be minimal.
Generally, it is expected that
expeditions will avoid sensitive marine
environments such as native hunting
areas, migratory routes, consistent
feeding grounds, or local breeding
grounds that concentrate cetaceans or
other sensitive species in critical areas,
thereby reducing the risk of exposure to
acoustical outputs from the SODV
operations. In the preferred alternative,
mitigating measures may include
modifying the schedule for an
expedition, selecting alternate sites, or
limiting the types of activities
performed to avoid or minimize
exposing sensitive marine organisms to
potentially disturbing or harmful
acoustic levels.
E:\FR\FM\30JNN1.SGM
30JNN1
36926
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 126 / Monday, June 30, 2008 / Notices
At drill sites where marine organisms
that are potentially sensitive to acoustic
sources may be densely populated or
the proposed research activities may
result in more intense or prolonged
acoustic exposures, a supplemental
environmental review may be prepared
to evaluate the site-specific risks and
develop recommendations for
additional mitigating measures.
Therefore, the extent of acoustical
source impacts in the preferred
alternative for all receptors including
cetaceans and other sensitive organisms
is expected to be minimal for IODP–
USIO ocean drilling expeditions.
Seismic surveys or vertical seismic
profiling may be periodically performed
and will incorporate BMPs to prevent
marine biota from being exposed to
sound levels that could result in injury
(= 180 dB re 1 µPa rms) or significant
behavioral changes (= 160 dB re 1 µPa
rms). Additional detail pertaining to the
impact assessment of seismic sources is
being prepared in a separate document,
to be entitled the Draft Programmatic
Environmental Impact Statement/
Overseas Environmental Impact
Statement for National Science
Foundation-Funded Marine Seismic
Research. This document will be
released for comment in mid-2008.
Marine Biological Resources (NearCoastal and Deep Sea)
Potential impacts to marine biological
resources resulting from the operation of
the SODV and riserless ocean drilling
activities are discussed below. Because
the scope of the PEIS provided a general
assessment of IODP–USIO riserless
drilling and related research activities
independent of specific geographic
locations and time periods, the impact
assessment focused on a qualitative
analysis regarding the potential range of
effects on these biological resources and
their anticipated significance. Using the
preferred alternative, these activities
would be planned and performed
following advisory support provided by
the IODP SAS taking into consideration
biological resources present at each
specific drill site and potential impacts
of the research.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Plankton
The intensity, extent, and duration of
potential impacts to plankton
communities resulting from the
discharges from SODV operations are
expected to include:
• Localized, short-term impacts to
zooplankton respiration resulting from
increased turbidity associated with
SODV discharges of treated wastewater,
greywater, and other liquid wastes;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:15 Jun 27, 2008
Jkt 214001
• Localized, short-term impacts to
phytoplankton and zooplankton
community structure due to increased
salinity from brinewater discharges;
• Localized, short term, and
reversible redistribution of
phytoplankton and zooplankton
communities within 100 m of the SODV
as a result of turbulence created by
thruster operations; and
• Interference with shallow or
deepwater zooplankton feeding and
respiratory activities due to the
increased suspended solids
concentrations within several hundred
meters of the borehole.
Similar to fish, it is possible that some
cephalopods may be deterred from an
area by incidental noise from the SODV.
The impacts associated with this
deterrence may include a temporary
disturbance in feeding and spawning
behavior in the general vicinity of the
vessel. Expeditions with longer
durations at one particular drill site will
have the potential for greater cumulative
noise impacts on cephalopod species
than those with shorter durations at
each drill site. No significant long-term
loss or degradation to biological
populations or communities or
functional habitat value is expected.
Fish
Benthos
In general, the resulting impacts to
benthos from riserless drilling
expeditions may include:
• Localized alteration of benthic
communities caused by physical
changes in the substrate;
• Localized interference with benthic
organism feeding and respiration due to
suspended particles of drill cuttings and
drilling mud; and
• Localized impacts to the benthic
community derived from smothering
effects of drill cuttings and drilling mud
particles deposited on the seafloor.
Overall, impacts to benthic organisms
resulting from riserless drilling
activities in the preferred alternative are
not expected to be significant.
Potentially sensitive benthic
communities unique to a particular area
will be identified during the IODP SAS
planning and review process. As
needed, drill site locations or particular
operations may be modified to avoid
significant adverse effects to these
sensitive benthic organisms. For
prospective drill sites where benthic
organisms that are especially sensitive
to the deposition of sediment from a
borehole are densely populated, or the
proposed research activities may result
in more intense or prolonged exposure,
a supplemental environmental review
may be prepared to evaluate the sitespecific impacts, if any, and, if
necessary, develop recommendations
for additional mitigating measures.
It is expected that most fish will avoid
the area and the continuous output of
noise generated by drilling and coring
operations, the transponder beacon
deployed near the drill site, and the
turbulence created by the vessel’s
thrusters. The intensity, extent, and
duration of potential impacts to fish
communities resulting from the
discharges from SODV operations and
drilling activities include:
• Localized, short-term disturbances
to fish resulting from turbulence created
by the thrusters when the vessel is
dynamically positioned at a drill site;
and
• Localized, short-term disturbances
to fish derived from the acoustic outputs
generated by the vessel’s thrusters,
drilling/coring operations, and
transponder beacons deployed near the
drill site.
Overall, impacts to fish associated
with IODP–USIO riserless drilling
activities are expected to be minimal.
Expeditions with longer durations will
have the potential for greater cumulative
noise and vibration impacts on fish
species than those with shorter
durations, but no significant behavioral
changes or long-term loss or degradation
to biological populations or
communities or functional habitat value
is expected.
Cephalopods
It is expected that the discharge of
liquids from the SODV will rapidly
disperse minimizing contact and impact
to cephalopods. No impacts are
anticipated as a result of the release of
the drill cuttings or drilling mud on
most cephalopod species, due to their
mobility and ability to temporarily leave
an affected area. Significant impacts to
cephalopod eggs, whether on substrates
or suspended in the water column, are
not expected, because of the limited
dispersal area of material discharged
focused around the borehole.
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Marine Mammals
The presence of the drillship, whether
in transit or at a drill site, is unlikely to
interfere with the movement of marine
mammals. Close approaches of the
vessel to marine mammals (or vice
versa) are expected to be rare,
considering that the proposed action
will only involve one vessel and that the
average density of marine mammals in
the open ocean is very low. When close
approaches occur, the mobility of
marine animals and their ability to
E:\FR\FM\30JNN1.SGM
30JNN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 126 / Monday, June 30, 2008 / Notices
detect the ship would permit them to
easily avoid contact, especially since the
cruise speed of the ship is generally 11
knots or less. Therefore, collisions
between the drilling ship and marine
mammals are not expected to occur.
Detours made by marine animals to
avoid the ship will be a temporary
response.
Discharges from the drillship could
potentially disturb marine mammals or
their food sources. Effects on water
quality from drillship discharges are
expected to be minimal and localized
near the ship. Because of rapid mixing
and the assimilative capacity of the sea,
marine mammals are not expected to be
exposed to the discharges. Wake and
disturbance effects such as turbulence
created by the dynamic positioning
thrusters are likely to deter most
mammals from approaching the vessel,
and instead will likely remain outside
the small area where an adverse effect
from discharges might occur. Direct
physical or toxicological effects of
various vessel discharges on marine
mammals are therefore unlikely and few
animals will be affected.
Acoustic outputs from SODV
operations have the potential to affect
marine mammals exposed to the
underwater sounds. No significant
physiological effects to individual
animals or marine mammal populations
are expected to result from noise
produced by the SODV. As previously
noted, the noise produced by SODV
operations may result in temporary
displacement or disturbance of some
marine organisms, including marine
mammals, but the organisms are
expected to return to the area after the
vessel departs. The single-channel
seismic surveys or vertical seismic
profiling, which may be occasionally
performed by the SODV at selected
sites, represent an additional noise
source. These activities will generally
involve small seismic sources (1 or 2
airguns) operated for short durations
(less than 12 hours). Resulting effects to
marine mammals, if any, will be
minimal and temporary due to the
consistent implementation of mitigating
measures to prevent exposure to
harmful sound levels or sound levels
that may initiate adverse behavioral
effects.
Though infrequent, helicopter
operations represent another noise
source that may occur during SODV
operations. Helicopter overflights will
temporarily affect the surface
environment at a given location. The
noise from helicopter operations can
cause a startle response and interrupt
whales and dolphins while resting,
feeding, breeding, or migrating. Both the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:15 Jun 27, 2008
Jkt 214001
noise and shadow cast by the helicopter
can elicit a response from nearby
cetaceans. These occurrences will be
temporary and will pass within seconds,
having no long-term impact on
cetaceans. The greatest potential effect
from helicopters is disturbance of
pinnipeds breeding rookeries although
such overflights would be severely
limited through the use of mitigating
measures.
As prompted by the IODP SAS review
and planning process for each
expedition, the IODP–USIO will obtain
necessary approvals for the areas in
which the vessel will operate including
permits and other regulatory
notifications. As necessary, the IODP–
USIO will consult with National Marine
Fisheries Service with respect to rare or
endangered species (e.g., North Atlantic
right whale, Northeast Atlantic bowhead
whale) listed in the Endangered Species
Act to prevent harassment or
interference to those species. In the
event that a proposed expedition that
has the potential to cause significant
adverse behavioral effects or
disturbances to marine mammals, the
IODP–USIO will apply for an IHA as
required by the Marine Mammal
Protection Act. Mitigating measures and
operating conditions developed in
response to these requirements and
notifications will be incorporated into
the Operating Plan and Scientific
Prospectus for the expedition
accordingly.
Marine Reptiles
The potential for exposure of marine
reptiles to SODV wastewater discharges
is expected to be minimal since water
column disturbances (e.g., turbulence)
caused by the SODV’s presence at a drill
site is likely to deter the animals from
approaching the vessel and coming in
contact with discharged wastewater.
Although sea turtles are generally not
sufficiently mobile to avoid a moving
ship in case of an imminent collision,
such situations are expected to be
relatively rare because the density of
turtles in the open ocean is very low.
Therefore, very few, if any, sea turtles
are likely to be involved in collisions
with the drillship, and the resulting
effects on turtle populations will be
minimal. Sea snakes, because of their
greater mobility, are unlikely to be
victims of a collision.
Based on limited available data on sea
turtles hearing abilities and effects
relating to exposure to acoustical
outputs, it is unlikely that sea turtles
will exhibit behavioral changes as a
result of acoustic outputs from SODV
operations. If a sea turtle approaches the
SODV during drilling, it is likely the
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36927
animal will exhibit an avoidance
reaction. Any effects on sea turtles will
generally be short term, reversible, and
are not expected to displace the animals
from their preferred habitats, foraging,
or breeding areas.
Unless the SODV is operating in a
concentrated area used by sea turtles for
breeding, it is unlikely that sea turtles
will be encountered during riserless
drilling expeditions. Based on IODP
SAS advice and guidance, mitigating
measures will be developed to prevent
significant adverse effects to marine
reptiles by addressing site-specific
factors or seasonal variations that could
affect the organisms near proposed drill
sites. Overall, the resulting impacts to
marine reptiles are expected to be
minimal, with no significant loss or
degradation of marine reptile
communities or functional habitats, or
seasonal migration patterns.
Birds
No impacts to birds are expected as a
result of air emissions generated during
SODV operations, including the
continuous release of fuel combustion
byproducts when the SODV is in transit
and is present at drill sites, intermittent
use of the SODV’s incinerators and the
periodic release of vapors and gases
from the vessels laboratories. The
emissions from all sources are expected
to disperse rapidly in the surrounding
atmosphere.
The SODV operations will result in
discharge of wastewater and victual
wastes each day the vessel is at sea.
These discharges could potentially
affect marine birds either directly while
the birds are in the water or indirectly
through the ingestion of fish or
plankton. Since the points of discharge
for liquid wastes from the drillship will
occur very close to the vessel, there
should be no significant direct physical
or toxicological effects on marine bird
populations.
The SODV contains numerous sources
of noise including the ship’s dieselelectric engines, mechanical equipment,
and various transducer-based devices.
The sounds from these sources will
propagate in air and be transmitted
through the vessel and into the water. It
is anticipated that the impacts to bird
communities as a result of the drillship
and associated equipment operation
will be minimal. SODV activities could
affect marine birds through disturbances
caused by helicopter overflights.
However, these disturbances are
expected to be very infrequent and
temporary. Therefore, only minimal,
short-term impacts on bird populations
and their flying patterns are expected.
E:\FR\FM\30JNN1.SGM
30JNN1
36928
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 126 / Monday, June 30, 2008 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Based on IODP SAS advice and
guidance, mitigating measures will be
developed to prevent significant adverse
effects to sensitive bird species that may
be present at specific drill sites. Overall,
the resulting impacts to birds in the
preferred alternative are expected to be
minimal.
Threatened and Endangered Species
As indicated above, activities
associated with the proposed action will
have minimal impacts on marine
organisms including plankton,
cephalopods, fish, marine mammals,
marine reptiles, and birds. This
conclusion also generally applies to
endangered and threatened species of
those groups; however, any impacts to
diminished populations or limited
ranges of threatened or endangered
species will be greater than impacts to
non-endangered species.
The SODV will comply with all
regulatory requirements pertaining to
threatened species such as the
Endangered Species Act. The IODP SAS
review process will ensure that
sufficient data is available to identify
critical species near the proposed drill
sites and recommends for
implementation measures to mitigate
potentially adverse impacts. If a
riserless drilling expedition is planned
in an area where endangered or
threatened species may be adversely
impacted or harmed, a supplemental
site-specific environmental review will
be performed to evaluate the risks of
proceeding with the proposed action
and to develop recommendations to
mitigate unacceptable risks.
SODV activities are generally not
expected to result in substantial loss or
degradation of the functional habitats
that may be used by threatened and
endangered species, nor are IODP
riserless drilling activities expected to
result in the impedance of fish or
wildlife migration routes. Because of the
sensitivity of some endangered
populations to the loss of even just one
individual, if endangered species,
habitats or other critical breeding,
feeding, or migratory areas are not
identified in advance, some impacts
resulting from the riserless drilling
expeditions may have the potential to be
significant. Therefore, drilling will be
avoided at locations where outputs such
as wastewater discharges, seafloor
alteration, or acoustical outputs have a
greater potential to adversely impact
local biota, habitats, or disrupt behavior.
Biologically Sensitive Areas
Despite the deep locations that the
SODV will operate, a majority of the
outputs associated with the operation of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:15 Jun 27, 2008
Jkt 214001
the vessels will occur near the surface
and hundreds of meters away from
sensitive communities and structures on
the seafloor, such as coral reefs,
hydrothermal vent (chemosynthetic)
communities, and seamounts.
Therefore, these types of outputs are not
expected to result in significant impacts
to these resources. Noise and vibrations
generated by the operation of the SODV
are expected to attenuate sufficiently
with distance from the source to prevent
most aquatic organisms from being
exposed to noise levels that would
result in adverse physiological effects.
Although noise produced by the SODV
during riserless drilling activities has
the potential to displace sensitive
marine organisms from their
community, it is anticipated that these
effects would only be realized during
the relatively short period of time the
vessel is on-site and drilling. Because
affected organisms in biologically
sensitive areas are expected to return
once the vessel leaves the area, the
resulting behavioral effects are
considered minimal and short term in
duration.
Similar to threatened or endangered
species, the IODP SAS review process
will ensure that sufficient data is
available to identify biological resources
in sensitive ecosystems that may be
adversely affected by the proposed
drilling activities and will recommend
appropriate site-specific restrictions or
best management practices accordingly.
For example, chemosynthetic
communities may be unlikely to recover
rapidly from drilling mud deposition,
increased turbidity, or changes to
substrates in the localized area
surrounding the borehole. If the
appropriate restrictions are not
implemented, long-term impacts to
these deepwater communities may
potentially occur, with recovery times
as long as 200 years for mature tube
worm communities. Similarly,
prolonged exposure of coral reefs to
sediment build-up, at any depth, would
have a negative impact on growth and
long-term survival.
Due to the diverse characteristics
associated with seamounts, the potential
impacts from the drilling operation in or
near these structures could vary quite
widely. Certain portions of the
seamount would likely be less
susceptible to severe impacts from the
drilling of a borehole. The potential
impacts associated with drilling on or
near seamounts are very similar to those
described for benthic organisms.
Nonetheless, because seamounts
represent such a diverse and in many
cases slow growing ecosystem, the
drilling impacts could be significant if
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
they result in substantial alteration or
destruction of habitat that prevents reestablishment of biologically significant
communities.
If a riserless drilling expedition is
planned in an area where biologically
sensitive organisms may be adversely
impacted or harmed, a supplemental
site-specific environmental review will
be performed to evaluate the risks of
proceeding with the proposed action
and recommendations to mitigate
unacceptable risks or select alternate
sites will be developed.
Commercial and Native Fisheries and
Aquaculture
To the extent that impacts to marine
fish species resulting from the proposed
riserless drilling operations affect the
subsistence value of fish used by
individuals as a food source or the
commercial harvesting of important
species, there will be an impact to
fisheries and aquaculture. However, the
potential for impacts to open ocean and
coastal marine fish resulting from both
the presence of the SODV and the
riserless drilling activities are not
expected to be significant regardless of
location.
Due to the mobility of fish and thus
their ability to avoid disturbances in
their habits, impact to fisheries will be
limited primarily to impacts such as
disturbances to schooling fish or the
smothering of food sources (e.g.,
plankton) or demersal eggs with drilling
sediments. Considering the temporary
nature of the drilling activity and the
small area of the sea affected, overall
impacts to marine fisheries and
aquaculture are expected to be minimal.
Appropriate best management
practices will be implemented to protect
fishery resources. For example,
permanent structures installed on the
seafloor such as observatories will be
designed to be trawl-resistant to prevent
damage to fishing nets in areas where
extensive bottom trawling occurs. If a
riserless drilling expedition is planned
in an area where fisheries or
aquaculture may be adversely impacted
or harmed, a supplemental site-specific
environmental review will be performed
to evaluate the risks and develop
recommendations to mitigate
unacceptable risks or select alternate
sites.
Marine Vessel Transport and Trade
Routes
Because ship traffic within a
geographic area is generally related to
the region’s proximity to trade routes
between the world’s major ports, the
potential impacts associated with SODV
E:\FR\FM\30JNN1.SGM
30JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 126 / Monday, June 30, 2008 / Notices
operations will be variable and
dependent on the drilling location.
Through normal expedition planning
or vessel operations, potential
interferences with marine transportation
at any given site are expected to be
minimal. When transiting or stationary
at a drill site, the SODV will comply
with all international conventions and
regulations pertaining to navigational
safety. When dynamically positioned at
a drill site, the SODV, by nature of the
activity, will be required to remain
stationary and essentially ‘‘tethered’’ to
the seafloor by the drilling equipment.
All approaching large maritime vessels
will be able to establish radar and/or
visual contact with the SODV well in
advance of any potential collision.
When the SODV is positioned at a drill
site, it will be the responsibility of the
approaching vessel to choose a course
which avoids a collision. However, the
SODV will maintain visual and radar
vigilance of pending traffic conflicts and
communicate accordingly via radio and
other means. In addition, the SODV will
display universally-recognized maritime
signal flags while drilling, indicating the
vessel has restricted ability to
maneuver.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Cultural Resources
A majority of IODP–USIO riserless
drilling activities will be conducted in
water depths greater than 500 m.
Therefore, most of the mapped
historical and cultural resources, which
are generally located in relatively
shallow coastal waters, will in all
likelihood not be affected by the
proposed activity. However, there are
undoubtedly untold numbers of
undiscovered shipwrecks and other
culturally significant artifacts lying at
great depth throughout the world’s
oceans, particularly along historic trade
routes.
The comprehensive review and
planning process involving the IODP
SAS, the EPSP, and other review panels
will evaluate each proposed riserless
drilling expedition. The site
characterization data in the site survey
data packages will include information
on known (mapped) cultural resources.
If proposed drill sites are located near
known or suspected cultural resource
sites, recommendations will be made to
either select alternate drill sites or
implement mitigating measures to
prevent damaging or destroying these
resources.
Catastrophic Events
The primary output resulting from a
catastrophic event related to the SODV
itself or drilling into a geological source
would be the uncontrolled release of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:15 Jun 27, 2008
Jkt 214001
petroleum hydrocarbons to the marine
environment. Based on IODP–USIO
riserless drilling experience, the
probability of a major spill or
catastrophic release of petroleum from
the SODV or a geological source is very
low. This is readily demonstrated by 21
years of ODP/IODP experience
involving riserless drilling of more than
1,900 boreholes without a major spill of
fuel from the vessel or accidental release
of hydrocarbons from a geologic source.
Building further upon this experience,
it is anticipated that this record of
preventing catastrophic releases will
continue with future SODV expeditions.
The IODP SAS comprehensive review
and advisory process combined with the
stringent program of continuous realtime monitoring of hydrocarbon
potential while drilling will further
reduce the risk of an uncontrolled
release of hydrocarbons from a geologic
source to an extremely low level. Input
from the IODP SAS review process may
also include recommendations for sitespecific mitigating measures such as
additional detection tools (e.g., logging
while drilling, measurement while
drilling) and the availability of
resources to respond to signs of geologic
hazards. For example, the IODP SAS
may recommend the availability of
heavy drilling mud at certain drills sites
which could quickly be deployed to
abandon a borehole or seal specific
stratigraphic intervals, thereby ensuring
a maximum level of protection from
potential petroleum releases.
Severe weather represents a
significant condition that could threaten
vessel operations and contribute to a
catastrophic release of petroleum. For
example, if the ship were to be blown
off a drill site during a severe storm
without ample time to retrieve the drill
string, the drill string could be lost and
the ship may be severely damaged if it
grounded in shallow water or onshore.
Through best management practices
including the operational planning
process for each expedition and
continuously monitoring ever-changing
weather conditions, the SODV will be
able to avoid environmental conditions
which could contribute to the
catastrophic release of petroleum from
the vessel.
During drilling, if conditions
suggesting the possible release of
petroleum hydrocarbons or other gasses
(e.g., hydrogen sulfide) are detected
during SODV operations, drilling will
immediately cease and a series of predefined control measures will be
implemented to stabilize and seal the
borehole thereby avoiding an
uncontrolled release to the marine
environment. It is possible, though
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36929
unlikely, that riserless drilling may
penetrate a thin, relatively undetectable
petroleum layer, resulting in its release
from the borehole to the marine
environment. In this instance, the
amount of material released would be
minimal.
Impact Summary
The majority of identified potential
environmental impacts are short term in
duration, of local extent, and minimal
intensity, with most impacts unlikely to
occur. Unavoidable impacts focus
around the effects of the drilling activity
itself, and include drill cuttings
deposited on the seafloor around the
borehole and fine grained particles
suspended in the water column or
deposited on the seafloor in the
borehole vicinity. Drilling locations will
be sited so as to minimize these
unavoidable impacts. Impacts with the
most severe consequences—oil and gas
releases from either a fuel spill from the
drilling vessel or from a blowout caused
by drilling into a pressurized geological
source—have not occurred in 40 years
of DSDP, ODP, or IODP operations
(1968–2008), and are judged highly
unlikely to occur. Table 1 identifies the
outputs associated with the preferred
alternative and summarizes the
significance of each potential impact.
Impact Mitigation
During each riserless drilling
expedition, Best Management Practices
(BMPs) and site-specific mitigating
measures will be implemented that are
intended to effectively reduce or avoid
impacts to the environment. The IODP–
USIO will be responsible for
implementing these measures and
assuring compliance by all applicable
IODP–USIO participants (e.g.,
contractors, field personnel,
researchers). Additionally, using 30
years of riserless drilling experience, the
IODP–USIO will continue to refine and
implement various BMPs and mitigating
measures to reduce or avoid adverse
impacts to marine organisms and the
physical environment.
BMPs represent routine actions that
may be performed during riserless
drilling expeditions including measures
that involve every phase of IODP–USIO
operations. Many of the BMPs have
already been incorporated into the
operating procedures that will be used
by the IODP–USIO, and have been
designed to complement the IODP’s core
environmental principles to (1) Protect
marine life and environment, (2)
dispose waste materials consistent with
applicable standards, (3) store and
transport samples in such a way as to
prevent contamination of the
E:\FR\FM\30JNN1.SGM
30JNN1
36930
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 126 / Monday, June 30, 2008 / Notices
environment, and (4) keeping the public
informed such as through the
dissemination of the PEIS.
TABLE 1.—SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL IMPACTS FROM IODP–USIO RISERLESS OCEAN DRILLING
Environmental impacts
Process/activity
Output
Affected environment
Duration
Operate the SODV
Discharges (treated
(vessel in transit
wastewater,
and at a drill site
greywater, treated
using thrusters for
bilgewater, deck
dynamic posidrainage, ballast
tioning; note: Imwater, treated lab
pacts associated
discharges).
with drilling and
coring activities are
summarized below).
Intensity
Probability
of an
impact
Short term
Water Quality
Seafloor.
Extent
Local .........................
Minimal ...
Unlikely ...
No environmental impacts
Severity
rating
1
0
Biological Resources
Typical ......................
Sensitive Areas ........
Fisheries ...................
Water Quality ...........
Physical Disturbances.
Short
Short
Short
Short
term
term
term
term
Seafloor ....................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
Minimal
Minimal
Minimal
Minimal
...
...
...
...
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
Unlikely
...
...
...
...
No environmental impacts
2
2
1
1
0
Short term
Short term
Local .........................
Local .........................
Minimal ...
Minimal ...
Unlikely ...
Unlikely ...
1
2
Typical ......................
Sensitive Areas ........
Fisheries ...................
Short term
Short term
Short term
Local .........................
Local .........................
Local .........................
Minimal ...
Minimal ...
Minimal ...
Unlikely ...
Unlikely ...
Unlikely ...
1
1
1
Air Quality ................
Air Quality ................
Vessel Crew & Resources.
Vessel Crew & Resources.
Short term
Short term
Continuous.
Continuous.
Local .........................
Local .........................
(Not Applicable) .......
Minimal ...
Minimal ...
Minimal ...
Unlikely ...
Unlikely ...
Unlikely ...
1
1
0
(Not Applicable) .......
Minimal ...
Unlikely ...
0
Water Quality ...........
Short term
Certain ....
2
Short term
Local; seawater drilling fluid injected
into the borehole
at ≤1,900 L/min;
fine grain particles
suspended in the
water column may
extend 100+ m
from the borehole.
Local; fine grain particles deposited
within 100+ m of
the borehole.
Minimal ...
Seafloor ....................
Underwater Noise
(operation of vessel engines, generators, thrusters,
mechanical systems, instruments,
transponder beacons).
Marine Traffic ...........
Acoustical Environment.
Local
Local
Local
Local
Minimal ...
Certain ....
2
Local; benthos & fish
eggs/larva may be
displaced.
Minimal ...
Possible ..
2
Biological Resources
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Conduct Riserless
Drilling and Coring
(in addition to impacts associated
with the operation
of the SODV).
Air Emissions:
• Exhaust & vapors
• Laboratory ............
Hazardous Materials
(storage & use).
Solid & Hazardous
Waste (handle,
store, incinerate).
Discharges (seawater drilling fluid,
sediment displaced
from the borehole,
drilling mud, cement, tracers).
Biological Resources
Typical ......................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:15 Jun 27, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Moderate
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\30JNN1.SGM
30JNN1
36931
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 126 / Monday, June 30, 2008 / Notices
TABLE 1.—SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL IMPACTS FROM IODP–USIO RISERLESS OCEAN DRILLING—Continued
Environmental impacts
Process/activity
Output
Affected environment
Duration
Sensitive Areas ........
Fisheries ...................
Short term
Cultural Resources ..
Physical Disturbances.
Long term
Long term
Water Quality ...........
Seafloor ....................
Intensity
Unlikely ...
3
Minimal ...
Unlikely ...
2
Minimal ...
Local; habit may be
disturbed.
Local; fish may be
displaced.
Local; deposition of
sediment.
Probability
of an
impact
Moderate
Extent
Highly Unlikely.
3
No environmental impacts
Severity
rating
0
Long term
Local; drill cuttings
mound within ∼5 m
of borehole.
Minimal ...
Certain ....
3
Typical ......................
Moderate
Minimal ...
Possible ..
3
Sensitive Areas ........
Moderate
Moderate
Unlikely ...
3
Fisheries ...................
Marine Traffic ...........
Cultural Resources ..
Moderate
Short term
Long term
Minimal ...
Minimal ...
Minimal ...
Short term
Minimal ...
Unlikely ...
Unlikely ...
Highly Unlikely.
Unlikely ...
3
1
3
Acoustical Environment.
Local; benthos may
be displaced or
smothered.
Local; benthos may
be displaced or
smothered.
Local .........................
Local .........................
Local; damage or alteration.
Local .........................
Short term
Short term
Short term
Local .........................
Local .........................
Local .........................
Minimal ...
Minimal ...
Minimal ...
Unlikely ...
Unlikely ...
1.
Biological Resources
Underwater Noise
(operation of vessel engines, generators, thrusters,
mechanical systems, instruments,
transponder beacons, drilling/coring).
2
Biological Resources
Typical ......................
Sensitive Areas ........
Fisheries ...................
Conduct Research
Activities (geophysical logging,
downhole measurements).
Discharges (none) ....
1
1
Water Quality ...........
No environmental impacts
0
Seafloor ....................
No environmental impacts
0
Typical ......................
No environmental impacts
0
Sensitive Areas ........
No environmental impacts
0
Fisheries ...................
No environmental impacts
0
Biological Resources
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Underwater Noise
(small seismic
sources).
Acoustical Environment.
Short term
Local .........................
Minimal ...
Unlikely ...
2
Short term
Short term
Short term
Local .........................
Local .........................
Local .........................
Minimal ...
Minimal ...
Minimal ...
Possible ..
Unlikely ...
Unlikely ...
1
1
1
Biological Resources
Typical ......................
Sensitive Areas ........
Fisheries ...................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:15 Jun 27, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\30JNN1.SGM
30JNN1
36932
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 126 / Monday, June 30, 2008 / Notices
TABLE 1.—SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL IMPACTS FROM IODP–USIO RISERLESS OCEAN DRILLING—Continued
Environmental impacts
Process/activity
Duration
Affected environment
Releases/Discharges
(heavy drilling mud
for borehole closure, cement for
casings and borehole seal, deployment of reentry devices, observatories and instruments).
Extent
Intensity
Probability
of an
impact
Water Quality ...........
Short term
Local .........................
Unlikely ...
Minimal ...
2
Seafloor ....................
Complete Boreholes
and Install Equipment.
Output
Long term
Local .........................
Minimal ...
Likely .......
3
Severity
rating
Biological Resources
Typical ......................
No environmental impacts
0
Fisheries ...................
Discharges (petroleum hydrocarbons
from major fuel
spill from the vessel; liquids and/or
gases from blowout caused by drilling into geological
source).
0
Sensitive Areas ........
Accidental Events .....
No environmental impacts
No environmental impacts
0
Air Quality ................
Short term
Local (petroleum vapors, gasses).
Severe ....
Highly Unlikely.
2
Water Quality ...........
Long term
Major ........................
Severe ....
4
Seafloor ....................
Long
Term.
Major ........................
Severe ....
Highly Unlikely.
Highly Unlikely.
Acoustical Environment.
No environmental impacts
4
0
Biological Resources
Typical ......................
Long term
Major ........................
Severe ....
Sensitive Areas ........
Long term
Major ........................
Severe ....
Fisheries ...................
Long term
Major ........................
Severe ....
Marine Traffic ...........
Long term
Major ........................
Severe ....
Highly Unlikely.
Highly Unlikely.
Highly Unlikely.
Highly Unlikely.
4
4
4
4
Notes: Severity Ratings: 0 = no impact; 1 = minimal local effect that ceases immediately after the vessel leaves a particular drill site; 2 = minimal local effect that continues for a limited period of time after the vessel has left a particular drill site; 3 = minimal local long-term effect; 4 =
substantial effects that may be realized on a major (regional) and long-term basis.
Current Status of the IODP–USIO
Activities and Schedule
The JOIDES Resolution is in the
process of being modernized and is
expected to be completed in fall 2008
(see https://www.joiscience.org/sodv).
The first expedition using the
modernized JOIDES Resolution is
scheduled to begin in November 2008.
Table 2 summarizes the expedition
schedule as of April 2008 (see https://
iodp.tamu.edu/scienceops) and
provides links to specific pre-cruise
information such as expedition
proposal, Scientific Prospectus,
location, and other data.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
TABLE 2.—USIO RISERLESS VESSEL EXPEDITION SCHEDULE
Expedition name
Canterbury Basin [more information].
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:15 Jun 27, 2008
Exp No.
Port of
origin
317 .......
TBD ......
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Dates 1 2
Nov ’08–Jan
’09.
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Total days
(port/sea)
Days at sea 3
(transit/ops)
Co-chief
scientists
USIO contact
TBD ................
TBD ................
C. Fulthorpe,
K. Hoyanagi.
J. Geldmacher.
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\30JNN1.SGM
30JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 126 / Monday, June 30, 2008 / Notices
36933
TABLE 2.—USIO RISERLESS VESSEL EXPEDITION SCHEDULE—Continued
Expedition name
Exp No.
Port of
origin
Dates 1 2
Total days
(port/sea)
Days at sea 3
(transit/ops)
Co-chief
scientists
Wilkes Land 3 [more information].
Pacific Equatorial Age Transect 4 [more information]/
Juan de Fuca [more information].
320 .......
TBD ......
Jan–Mar ’09 ...
TBD ................
TBD ................
TBD ......
TBD ......
TBD ................
TBD ................
TBD ................
C. Escutia, H.
Brinkhuis.
N. Ahagon, H.
˝
Palike, M.
Lyle, I. Raffi.
USIO contact
A. Klaus.
K. Gamage.
Notes:
1 Dates for expeditions may be adjusted pending final vessel delivery date from shipyard.
2 The start date reflects the initial port call day. The vessel will sail when ready.
3 Wilkes Land Activities include completion of the Adelie Drift APL.
4 The schedule after Wilkes Land is dependent upon available funding and logistical possibilities.
Conclusion
Alternative B has been selected as the
preferred alternative, judged as
providing the most scientific return
while being most effective at
minimizing environmental, health, and
safety risks. Importantly, this
Alternative provides two separate
reviews of scientific drilling proposals,
independent of the drillship operator,
that examine not only drilling safety but
also environmental impacts and
mitigation measures. Review of safety
issues and drilling hazards of drilling
proposals by the IODP–USIO’s Safety
Panel occurs in parallel with review by
the IODP Environmental Protection and
Safety Panel (EPSP). The EPSP
examines potential environmental
hazards in addition to those of drilling
safety, and, importantly, recommends
mitigation procedures to reduce
environmental impact.
On behalf of NSF, I hereby authorize
the decision to move forward with
funding the United States Implementing
Organization’s participation in the
Integrated Ocean Drilling Program.
Dr. Julie Morris,
Director, Division of Ocean Sciences,
National Science Foundation.
Submitted for the National Science
Foundation on June 25, 2008.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation.
[FR Doc. E8–14772 Filed 6–27–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
[Docket No. NRC–2008–0358]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC).
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
1. Is the proposed collection of
information necessary for the NRC to
properly perform its functions? Does the
information have practical utility?
2. Is the burden estimate accurate?
3. Is there a way to enhance the
SUMMARY: The NRC invites public
quality, utility, and clarity of the
comment about our intention to request information to be collected?
the OMB’s approval for renewal of an
4. How can the burden of the
existing information collection that is
information collection be minimized,
summarized below. We are required to
including the use of automated
publish this notice in the Federal
collection techniques or other forms of
Register under the provisions of the
information technology?
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
A copy of the draft supporting
U.S.C. Chapter 35).
statement may be viewed free of charge
Information pertaining to the
at the NRC Public Document Room, One
requirement to be submitted:
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
1. The title of the information
Pike, Room O–1 F21, Rockville, MD
collection: Voluntary Reporting of
20852. OMB clearance requests are
Performance Indicators.
available at the NRC worldwide Web
2. Current OMB approval number:
site: https://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/
3150–0195.
doc-comment/omb/. The
3. How often the collection is
document will be available on the NRC
required: Quarterly.
home page site for 60 days after the
4. Who is required or asked to report:
signature date of this notice. Comments
Power reactor licensees.
5. The number of annual respondents: submitted in writing or in electronic
form will be made available for public
104.
inspection. Because your comments will
6. The number of hours needed
annually to complete the requirement or not be edited to remove any identifying
or contact information, the NRC
request: Approximately 84,500 hours
cautions you against including any
(83,200 reporting hours plus 1,300
information in your submission that you
recordkeeping hours for 26
do not want to be publicly disclosed.
recordkeepers).
7. Abstract: As part of a joint industry- Comments submitted should reference
Docket No. NRC–2008–0358. You may
NRC initiative, the NRC receives
submit your comments by any of the
information submitted voluntarily by
following methods. Electronic
power reactor licensees regarding
comments: Go to https://
selected performance attributes known
www.regulations.gov and search for
as performance indicators (PIs). PIs are
Docket No. NRC–2008–0358. Mail
objective measures of the performance
comments to NRC Clearance Officer,
of licensee systems or programs. The
Margaret A. Janney (T–5 F52), U.S.
NRC’s reactor oversight process uses PI
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
information, along with the results of
Washington, DC 20555–0001. Questions
inspections, as the basis for NRC
about the information collection
conclusions regarding plant
requirements may be directed to the
performance and necessary regulatory
NRC Clearance Officer, Margaret A.
response. Licensees transmit PIs
Janney (T–5 F52), U.S. Nuclear
electronically to reduce burden on
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
themselves and the NRC.
DC 20555–0001, by telephone at 301–
Submit, by August 29, 2008,
415–7245, or by e-mail to
comments that address the following
INFOCOLLECTS.Resource@NRC.GOV.
questions:
Notice of pending NRC action to
submit an information collection
request to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) and solicitation of public
comment.
ACTION:
16:15 Jun 27, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\30JNN1.SGM
30JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 126 (Monday, June 30, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36919-36933]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-14772]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Record of Decision: United States Implementing Organization's
Participation in the Integrated Ocean Drilling Program
AGENCY: National Science Foundation.
ACTION: Record of Decision: United States Implementing Organization's
Participation in the Integrated Ocean Drilling Program
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. James Allan, Program Director,
Ocean Drilling Program, Division of Ocean Sciences, National Science
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 725, Arlington, VA 22230.
Telephone: (703) 292-8581. E-mail: jallan@nsf.gov.
SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF) has decided to proceed
with funding the United States Implementing Organization's (USIO)
participation in the Integrated Ocean Drilling Program (IODP), an
international research program that explores the history and structure
of the earth as recorded in seafloor sediments, fluids, and rocks. The
planned action will result in the United States providing and operating
a light, riserless drilling vessel, the modernized and retrofitted
JOIDES Resolution, also referred to as the Scientific Ocean Drilling
Vessel (SODV). The Consortium for Ocean Leadership, Inc. (COL) and its
partners, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University
(LDEO) and Texas A&M University (TAMU) through the Texas A&M Research
Foundation (TAMRF) have been selected by NSF to be the IODP-USIO for
the light drilling vessel and related activities.
Alternative B has been selected as the preferred alternative. In
reaching this decision, the Director of the NSF Ocean Drilling Program
has considered the potential environmental impacts addressed in the
Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) for proposed IODP-
USIO activities. The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), a part
of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), was a
cooperating agency in the preparation of the PEIS. The Director has
also sought input from Federal agencies, research institutions, private
organizations, and individuals. A Notice of Availability for public
review of the draft PEIS was published in the Federal Register and
copies of the document were made available for review to all interested
parties including international and U.S. Federal agencies, research
institutions, private organizations, and individuals. Two public
meetings were conducted. No comments were received.
NSF will distribute this Record of Decision (ROD) to all known
interested and affected persons and agencies and will publish a notice
of its availability in the Federal Register.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Decision
Background
The NSF proposes to fund the USIO's participation in the IODP,
which involves the operation of a light,
[[Page 36920]]
riserless drilling vessel, the JOIDES Resolution (SODV) and the
performance of related activities to support earth sciences research
throughout the world's oceans where riserless drilling is optimally
suited. Proposed activities to be conducted by the JOIDES Resolution
include the mechanical operation of the vessel, riserless ocean
drilling, core sampling, and onboard research activities.
The IODP is an integrated, multi-drilling platform scientific
research program with objectives identified in the IODP Science Plan
(ISP), which provides fundamental guidance as to the scientific and
technical objectives. IODP studies will lead to a better understanding
of the deep biosphere and the sub-seafloor ocean; environmental change,
processes, and impacts; and solid earth cycles and geodynamics. The
specific IODP initial drilling initiatives require the IODP to deploy
closely linked drilling platform types simultaneously. A riserless
drillship such as the JOIDES Resolution will enable the IODP to reach
the ocean's greatest depths more effectively than the other two
available drilling IODP platforms. Additionally, the JOIDES Resolution
will serve as a state-of-the-art riserless drilling research platform
that is critical for achieving the program's scientific goals,
particularly as IODP drilling progresses into harsher environments,
where the challenge of recovering biologically, chemically and
physically intact samples continues to increase.
Alternatives Considered
The PEIS focused on the evaluation of all SODV operations and
research activities independent of specific geographic locations and
considered the following alternatives:
Alternative A--Conduct Riserless Ocean Drilling Based Solely on
Scientific Research Needs
In Alternative A, riserless ocean drilling expeditions would be
designed and conducted to meet site-specific scientific objectives as
developed by the proponents of the research. In this alternative, the
primary focus during the planning and implementation of riserless
drilling expeditions would be on achieving the proposed scientific
objectives and avoiding unsafe working conditions. Figure 1 identifies
the process features and the environmental components of this
alternative.
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
[[Page 36921]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30JN08.024
[[Page 36922]]
In this alternative, TAMU and LDEO, the IODP-USIO's science support
contractors, would maintain a distinct, independent panel of safety
experts (Safety Panel) to advise the USIO on safety issues and drilling
hazards. The Safety Panel would review all site-specific data
pertaining to each expedition and render a final decision regarding
site safety. No additional review and advisory support would be
provided such as guidance from the IODP.
Prior to each expedition, a detailed Scientific Prospectus would be
prepared by key operations and research personnel which reflects the
agreed upon priorities and implementation strategies for each
expedition. The Site Survey Package consisting of data required for an
expedition would be published in the Scientific Prospectus. The
Expedition Safety Package would then be prepared which would be a
collection of all data and documentation (including the Site Survey
Package) necessary to support a safe and environmentally compliant
operation. Both the Site Safety and the Expedition Safety Packages
would contain pertinent information on the potential geological or
environmental hazards that would be used to determine appropriate
contingencies during drilling.
Prior to the vessel departure, the IODP-USIO would obtain necessary
approvals for the areas in which the vessel would operate including
permits and other regulatory notifications. In parallel, the vessel
operator (ODL/Transocean) would ensure that vessel systems such as
engines, incinerators, and wastewater treatment devices are functioning
properly per regulatory requirements (e.g., MARPOL).
Alternative B--Conduct Riserless Ocean Drilling Based on Specific
Scientific Research Needs and IODP Support
In Alternative B, riserless ocean drilling expeditions would be
designed and conducted to meet site-specific scientific objectives as
presented by the proponents of the research and would incorporate
advisory input from the IODP as well as the USIO's Safety Panel
guidance as described in Alternative A.
In this alternative, the value of the potential scientific results
of any drilling proposal would be balanced against the possible hazards
so that IODP-USIO riserless operations can achieve valuable scientific
results without jeopardizing the health of individuals, the
environment, or the future of the program. Figure 2 depicts the
combined IODP and USIO review processes which would be used to select
safe drilling locations and methods and identify site-specific
environmental conditions that could be adversely affected by riserless
drilling activities before an expedition is included in the drilling
program.
Proposals and associated data packages would then be reviewed by
the Environmental Protection and Safety Panel (EPSP), an advisory panel
comprised of multi-disciplinary experts drawn from industry,
government, and academia to provide independent advice to IODP
regarding potential safety and environmental hazards that may exist
because of general or specific geology of the seafloor, as a
consequence of human activities, or the potential impact on the marine
life and their environment. During the EPSP review process, a
representative proponent would make a presentation consisting of a
project overview followed by an appraisal of each proposed drill site
and a description of the key safety and environmental issues. The
purpose of the presentation would be to provide the panel with
information on the proposed drilling activities, environmental
conditions at each drill site, and other site-specific features that
would allow the panel to identify operational hazards and potential
environmental impacts.
[[Page 36923]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30JN08.025
[[Page 36924]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30JN08.026
Following their review, the EPSP would provide guidance on site
selection and data processing to improve imaging of the sites, and on
modification of site locations, so that the proposed sites would be
safe to drill and will meet the scientific objectives. Final EPSP
recommendations for each site may include approval as requested,
approval with conditions regarding drill sites, drilling order, depths,
associated monitoring requirements, or site-specific mitigating
measures. In concert with EPSP advice, the IODP-USIO Safety Panel would
review all site-specific data pertaining to a particular expedition and
render a final decision regarding site safety.
Prior to each expedition, a detailed Scientific Prospectus would be
prepared by key operations and research personnel which reflects the
agreed upon priorities and implementation strategies for each
expedition. The Site Survey Package consisting of data required for an
expedition would be published in the Scientific Prospectus. The
Expedition Safety Package would then be prepared which would be a
collection of all data and documentation (including the Site Survey
Package) necessary to support a safe and environmentally compliant
operation. Both the Site Safety and the Expedition Safety Packages
would contain pertinent information on the potential geological or
environmental hazards that would be used to determine appropriate
contingencies during drilling.
Prior to the vessel departure, the IODP-USIO would obtain necessary
approvals for the areas in which the vessel would operate including
permits and other regulatory notifications. In Alternative B, site-
specific environmental assessments, Incidental Harassment
Authorizations (IHA), mitigating measures, monitoring strategies, and
contingencies for alternate drill sites, would be developed based on
conditions or requirements identified during the comprehensive review
process, reviewed by the appropriate authorities, and incorporated into
the operating plan. In parallel, the vessel operator (ODL/Transocean)
would ensure that vessel systems such as engines, incinerators, and
wastewater treatment devices are functioning properly per regulatory
requirements (e.g., MARPOL).
Alternative C--Do Not Conduct Ocean Drilling (No Action Alternative)
In Alternative C, the IODP-USIO would not operate the SODV and
would not provide the riserless ocean drilling capability to the IODP.
Unless the riserless drilling resources are realized from other
sources, the IODP's goal to integrate multiple drilling platforms,
exploratory tools, and diverse strategies to resolve outstanding
research questions as identified in the ISP may not be achieved. The
long-term U.S. commitment and expertise to support earth sciences
research using riserless ocean drilling technologies would be lost.
Preferred Alternative
Alternative B has been selected as the preferred alternative. As
shown in Figure 2, critical environmental components will be identified
during the review process and necessary contingencies and site-specific
mitigating measures planned accordingly. For example, some common
environmental issues addressed during IODP reviews include:
Potential for encountering a pressurized section of the
sub-seafloor while drilling;
Indications of active (or previously active) vent systems
or hydrocarbon seeps in the area of proposed drilling;
Probability of encountering H2S (hydrogen
sulfide) or hydrates during coring or core recovery activities;
Presence of any biological communities within 100 meters
of any proposed drill sites, their type (e.g., vents, deep-water
reefs), and evidence for their existence (e.g., sampling, visual);
Presence of a nearby fishery (species, typical gear),
known local breeding ground, consistent feeding area, migration route,
or habitat to threatened or endangered species; and
Availability of alternative sites in the event that
weather, currents, ice, sensitive biological communities prevent
drilling.
In addition, the site survey data required as a result of the
comprehensive review process will characterize the area in the
immediate vicinity (within 1 km) of each proposed drill site for the
purpose of evaluating seafloor conditions (water depth, seafloor
topography and stability) and identifying potential hazards and
environmental concerns while allowing flexibility in the use of
alternate drill sites if unexpected field conditions prevent drilling
at primary locations. Benefits derived from the collaboration of USIO
riserless drilling planning efforts and IODP SAS review processes will
effectively contribute to minimizing adverse environmental impacts and
include:
Selecting the optimum drilling platform based upon site-
specific conditions and research objectives;
Ensuring that site characterization data is adequate to
support the proposed research objectives and identify potentially
sensitive environmental conditions for protection;
Selecting the most appropriate drilling locations and
minimal number of boreholes to be drilled based on
[[Page 36925]]
research needs and local environmental conditions;
Developing plans and procedures to limit vessel and
drilling related discharges in environmentally sensitive areas to the
minimum needed to support the intended research; and
Minimizing the use of acoustic sources (e.g., transducer-
based equipment, seismic sources) in environments containing organisms
sensitive to outputs from these sources.
By contrast, the nominal planning and review process for riserless
drilling expeditions that would be implemented by selecting Alternative
A (i.e., to only meet proposed scientific objectives and avoiding
unsafe working conditions) would not provide the mechanisms to identify
sensitive environmental conditions and avoid potential impacts.
Impacts
The findings of the PEIS indicate that a majority of the outputs
associated with the performance of the preferred alternative will have
minor and transitory effects on the environment. This alternative
incorporates the IODP SAS review and advisory process to identify
potentially sensitive environments and recommends the use of best
management practices (BMPs) and site-specific mitigating measures to
reduce environmental outputs associated with drilling and coring
operations.
A majority of the impacts resulting from the preferred alternative
will be localized and will disappear once the vessel completes drilling
activities at a particular site and leaves the area. Many of the
outputs and resulting impacts associated with the operation of the SODV
such as wastewater discharges, air emissions, and the propagation of
underwater noise from propulsion equipment and transducer-based
equipment are common to most merchant marine vessels. Some outputs
associated with riserless drilling activities (seafloor disturbance,
deposition of sediment drill cuttings, deployment of equipment or
materials) may remain evident on the seafloor for extended periods of
time after borehole drilling is complete; however, the effects on the
benthic environment will be minor. Further details describing these
impacts of the preferred alternative are provided below.
Marine Water Quality
The impacts to water quality resulting from the mechanical
operation of the SODV will include:
Localized, short-term impacts resulting from SODV
discharges of treated wastewater, greywater, treated bilgewater, deck
drainage, ballast water, and treated lab discharges; and
Localized disturbances resulting from mixing of the water
column surrounding the SODV during thruster operation.
Impacts to water quality associated with drilling and coring
operations and borehole completion activities will include:
Localized effects near a borehole resulting from the
discharge of seawater drilling fluid, sediment displaced from the
borehole, drilling mud, cement, and tracers.
Sea Bottom and Sediment Quality
The impacts to the seafloor environment and sediment quality
resulting from drilling and coring operations and borehole completion
activities will include:
Localized disturbances to the seafloor derived from the
installation of boreholes and the introduction of naturally occurring
drilling muds and cement;
Localized deposition of drill cuttings and drilling mud
particles, and alteration of seafloor topography;
Displacement or smothering of benthic organisms in the
immediate vicinity of the borehole; and
Localized disturbances to the seafloor derived from the
installation of permanent structures.
Air Quality
The emissions resulting from SODV operations, including engine
exhaust and incinerator combustion byproducts, are expected to be
transitory and will not adversely impair local air quality. Fuel
evaporative emissions resulting from SODV operations are not expected
to be detectable or adversely affect local air quality. Similarly,
emissions from volatile or gaseous chemicals used onboard the SODV for
operations or in the laboratories are expected to be minimal. Because
the chemicals are used on an intermittent basis and in small
quantities, the resulting air emissions are expected to be minimal.
Acoustic Environment
During transit, sound and vibration produced by the SODV engines,
propulsion systems, and transducer-based instruments may be noticeable
to nearby marine organisms. It is expected that many potential
receptors will perceive the continuous noise produced by the
approaching vessel and will deviate from the path of the vessel thereby
avoiding exposure to peak and potentially harmful noise levels. For
several reasons, it is unlikely that the transducer-based equipment on
the SODV would cause a marine organism to be exposed to sound levels
greater than the 180 dB re 1 [mu]Pa (rms) level which NMFS considers to
be potentially harmful. First, most sound sources emit energy in
narrowly focused beams directed toward the seafloor and would only
affect organisms directly beneath the vessel. Second, at a typical
cruising speed of 11 knots (20 km/hr), it is expected that if an
organism were exposed to noise from the vessel, it would only be for a
short period of time. Finally, the short pulse duration from the
transducer devices reduces the risk of hearing impairment or other
injury to exposed organisms.
The noise created by the SODV while it is dynamically positioned
over a drill site and the physical turbulence in the water caused by
the vessel's thrusters are likely to deter many marine organisms from
approaching the drillship and becoming exposed to potentially intense
sound levels. Because most drill sites will be located in deep open
ocean areas that are not densely populated by marine organisms, the
potential that an individual or a population of animals may be exposed
to continuous noise levels that could cause behavioral changes is very
low.
Similarly, the short-term increase in the ambient noise created by
vessel operations or drilling and coring may deter some organisms from
a particular area, resulting in temporary displacement and possible
disturbance to an animals' feeding or spawning behavior. In general,
the SODV will only occupy a drill site for a relatively short period of
time (i.e., hours or days) allowing displaced organisms to repopulate
the area when drilling ceases and the vessel departs.
In most areas where the SODV is expected to operate, the range of
potential effects to biological receptors resulting from riserless
ocean drilling operations and related research activities are expected
to be minimal. Generally, it is expected that expeditions will avoid
sensitive marine environments such as native hunting areas, migratory
routes, consistent feeding grounds, or local breeding grounds that
concentrate cetaceans or other sensitive species in critical areas,
thereby reducing the risk of exposure to acoustical outputs from the
SODV operations. In the preferred alternative, mitigating measures may
include modifying the schedule for an expedition, selecting alternate
sites, or limiting the types of activities performed to avoid or
minimize exposing sensitive marine organisms to potentially disturbing
or harmful acoustic levels.
[[Page 36926]]
At drill sites where marine organisms that are potentially
sensitive to acoustic sources may be densely populated or the proposed
research activities may result in more intense or prolonged acoustic
exposures, a supplemental environmental review may be prepared to
evaluate the site-specific risks and develop recommendations for
additional mitigating measures. Therefore, the extent of acoustical
source impacts in the preferred alternative for all receptors including
cetaceans and other sensitive organisms is expected to be minimal for
IODP-USIO ocean drilling expeditions.
Seismic surveys or vertical seismic profiling may be periodically
performed and will incorporate BMPs to prevent marine biota from being
exposed to sound levels that could result in injury (= 180 dB re 1
[mu]Pa rms) or significant behavioral changes (= 160 dB re 1 [mu]Pa
rms). Additional detail pertaining to the impact assessment of seismic
sources is being prepared in a separate document, to be entitled the
Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement/Overseas
Environmental Impact Statement for National Science Foundation-Funded
Marine Seismic Research. This document will be released for comment in
mid-2008.
Marine Biological Resources (Near-Coastal and Deep Sea)
Potential impacts to marine biological resources resulting from the
operation of the SODV and riserless ocean drilling activities are
discussed below. Because the scope of the PEIS provided a general
assessment of IODP-USIO riserless drilling and related research
activities independent of specific geographic locations and time
periods, the impact assessment focused on a qualitative analysis
regarding the potential range of effects on these biological resources
and their anticipated significance. Using the preferred alternative,
these activities would be planned and performed following advisory
support provided by the IODP SAS taking into consideration biological
resources present at each specific drill site and potential impacts of
the research.
Plankton
The intensity, extent, and duration of potential impacts to
plankton communities resulting from the discharges from SODV operations
are expected to include:
Localized, short-term impacts to zooplankton respiration
resulting from increased turbidity associated with SODV discharges of
treated wastewater, greywater, and other liquid wastes;
Localized, short-term impacts to phytoplankton and
zooplankton community structure due to increased salinity from
brinewater discharges;
Localized, short term, and reversible redistribution of
phytoplankton and zooplankton communities within 100 m of the SODV as a
result of turbulence created by thruster operations; and
Interference with shallow or deepwater zooplankton feeding
and respiratory activities due to the increased suspended solids
concentrations within several hundred meters of the borehole.
Fish
It is expected that most fish will avoid the area and the
continuous output of noise generated by drilling and coring operations,
the transponder beacon deployed near the drill site, and the turbulence
created by the vessel's thrusters. The intensity, extent, and duration
of potential impacts to fish communities resulting from the discharges
from SODV operations and drilling activities include:
Localized, short-term disturbances to fish resulting from
turbulence created by the thrusters when the vessel is dynamically
positioned at a drill site; and
Localized, short-term disturbances to fish derived from
the acoustic outputs generated by the vessel's thrusters, drilling/
coring operations, and transponder beacons deployed near the drill
site.
Overall, impacts to fish associated with IODP-USIO riserless
drilling activities are expected to be minimal. Expeditions with longer
durations will have the potential for greater cumulative noise and
vibration impacts on fish species than those with shorter durations,
but no significant behavioral changes or long-term loss or degradation
to biological populations or communities or functional habitat value is
expected.
Cephalopods
It is expected that the discharge of liquids from the SODV will
rapidly disperse minimizing contact and impact to cephalopods. No
impacts are anticipated as a result of the release of the drill
cuttings or drilling mud on most cephalopod species, due to their
mobility and ability to temporarily leave an affected area. Significant
impacts to cephalopod eggs, whether on substrates or suspended in the
water column, are not expected, because of the limited dispersal area
of material discharged focused around the borehole.
Similar to fish, it is possible that some cephalopods may be
deterred from an area by incidental noise from the SODV. The impacts
associated with this deterrence may include a temporary disturbance in
feeding and spawning behavior in the general vicinity of the vessel.
Expeditions with longer durations at one particular drill site will
have the potential for greater cumulative noise impacts on cephalopod
species than those with shorter durations at each drill site. No
significant long-term loss or degradation to biological populations or
communities or functional habitat value is expected.
Benthos
In general, the resulting impacts to benthos from riserless
drilling expeditions may include:
Localized alteration of benthic communities caused by
physical changes in the substrate;
Localized interference with benthic organism feeding and
respiration due to suspended particles of drill cuttings and drilling
mud; and
Localized impacts to the benthic community derived from
smothering effects of drill cuttings and drilling mud particles
deposited on the seafloor.
Overall, impacts to benthic organisms resulting from riserless
drilling activities in the preferred alternative are not expected to be
significant. Potentially sensitive benthic communities unique to a
particular area will be identified during the IODP SAS planning and
review process. As needed, drill site locations or particular
operations may be modified to avoid significant adverse effects to
these sensitive benthic organisms. For prospective drill sites where
benthic organisms that are especially sensitive to the deposition of
sediment from a borehole are densely populated, or the proposed
research activities may result in more intense or prolonged exposure, a
supplemental environmental review may be prepared to evaluate the site-
specific impacts, if any, and, if necessary, develop recommendations
for additional mitigating measures.
Marine Mammals
The presence of the drillship, whether in transit or at a drill
site, is unlikely to interfere with the movement of marine mammals.
Close approaches of the vessel to marine mammals (or vice versa) are
expected to be rare, considering that the proposed action will only
involve one vessel and that the average density of marine mammals in
the open ocean is very low. When close approaches occur, the mobility
of marine animals and their ability to
[[Page 36927]]
detect the ship would permit them to easily avoid contact, especially
since the cruise speed of the ship is generally 11 knots or less.
Therefore, collisions between the drilling ship and marine mammals are
not expected to occur. Detours made by marine animals to avoid the ship
will be a temporary response.
Discharges from the drillship could potentially disturb marine
mammals or their food sources. Effects on water quality from drillship
discharges are expected to be minimal and localized near the ship.
Because of rapid mixing and the assimilative capacity of the sea,
marine mammals are not expected to be exposed to the discharges. Wake
and disturbance effects such as turbulence created by the dynamic
positioning thrusters are likely to deter most mammals from approaching
the vessel, and instead will likely remain outside the small area where
an adverse effect from discharges might occur. Direct physical or
toxicological effects of various vessel discharges on marine mammals
are therefore unlikely and few animals will be affected.
Acoustic outputs from SODV operations have the potential to affect
marine mammals exposed to the underwater sounds. No significant
physiological effects to individual animals or marine mammal
populations are expected to result from noise produced by the SODV. As
previously noted, the noise produced by SODV operations may result in
temporary displacement or disturbance of some marine organisms,
including marine mammals, but the organisms are expected to return to
the area after the vessel departs. The single-channel seismic surveys
or vertical seismic profiling, which may be occasionally performed by
the SODV at selected sites, represent an additional noise source. These
activities will generally involve small seismic sources (1 or 2
airguns) operated for short durations (less than 12 hours). Resulting
effects to marine mammals, if any, will be minimal and temporary due to
the consistent implementation of mitigating measures to prevent
exposure to harmful sound levels or sound levels that may initiate
adverse behavioral effects.
Though infrequent, helicopter operations represent another noise
source that may occur during SODV operations. Helicopter overflights
will temporarily affect the surface environment at a given location.
The noise from helicopter operations can cause a startle response and
interrupt whales and dolphins while resting, feeding, breeding, or
migrating. Both the noise and shadow cast by the helicopter can elicit
a response from nearby cetaceans. These occurrences will be temporary
and will pass within seconds, having no long-term impact on cetaceans.
The greatest potential effect from helicopters is disturbance of
pinnipeds breeding rookeries although such overflights would be
severely limited through the use of mitigating measures.
As prompted by the IODP SAS review and planning process for each
expedition, the IODP-USIO will obtain necessary approvals for the areas
in which the vessel will operate including permits and other regulatory
notifications. As necessary, the IODP-USIO will consult with National
Marine Fisheries Service with respect to rare or endangered species
(e.g., North Atlantic right whale, Northeast Atlantic bowhead whale)
listed in the Endangered Species Act to prevent harassment or
interference to those species. In the event that a proposed expedition
that has the potential to cause significant adverse behavioral effects
or disturbances to marine mammals, the IODP-USIO will apply for an IHA
as required by the Marine Mammal Protection Act. Mitigating measures
and operating conditions developed in response to these requirements
and notifications will be incorporated into the Operating Plan and
Scientific Prospectus for the expedition accordingly.
Marine Reptiles
The potential for exposure of marine reptiles to SODV wastewater
discharges is expected to be minimal since water column disturbances
(e.g., turbulence) caused by the SODV's presence at a drill site is
likely to deter the animals from approaching the vessel and coming in
contact with discharged wastewater.
Although sea turtles are generally not sufficiently mobile to avoid
a moving ship in case of an imminent collision, such situations are
expected to be relatively rare because the density of turtles in the
open ocean is very low. Therefore, very few, if any, sea turtles are
likely to be involved in collisions with the drillship, and the
resulting effects on turtle populations will be minimal. Sea snakes,
because of their greater mobility, are unlikely to be victims of a
collision.
Based on limited available data on sea turtles hearing abilities
and effects relating to exposure to acoustical outputs, it is unlikely
that sea turtles will exhibit behavioral changes as a result of
acoustic outputs from SODV operations. If a sea turtle approaches the
SODV during drilling, it is likely the animal will exhibit an avoidance
reaction. Any effects on sea turtles will generally be short term,
reversible, and are not expected to displace the animals from their
preferred habitats, foraging, or breeding areas.
Unless the SODV is operating in a concentrated area used by sea
turtles for breeding, it is unlikely that sea turtles will be
encountered during riserless drilling expeditions. Based on IODP SAS
advice and guidance, mitigating measures will be developed to prevent
significant adverse effects to marine reptiles by addressing site-
specific factors or seasonal variations that could affect the organisms
near proposed drill sites. Overall, the resulting impacts to marine
reptiles are expected to be minimal, with no significant loss or
degradation of marine reptile communities or functional habitats, or
seasonal migration patterns.
Birds
No impacts to birds are expected as a result of air emissions
generated during SODV operations, including the continuous release of
fuel combustion byproducts when the SODV is in transit and is present
at drill sites, intermittent use of the SODV's incinerators and the
periodic release of vapors and gases from the vessels laboratories. The
emissions from all sources are expected to disperse rapidly in the
surrounding atmosphere.
The SODV operations will result in discharge of wastewater and
victual wastes each day the vessel is at sea. These discharges could
potentially affect marine birds either directly while the birds are in
the water or indirectly through the ingestion of fish or plankton.
Since the points of discharge for liquid wastes from the drillship will
occur very close to the vessel, there should be no significant direct
physical or toxicological effects on marine bird populations.
The SODV contains numerous sources of noise including the ship's
diesel-electric engines, mechanical equipment, and various transducer-
based devices. The sounds from these sources will propagate in air and
be transmitted through the vessel and into the water. It is anticipated
that the impacts to bird communities as a result of the drillship and
associated equipment operation will be minimal. SODV activities could
affect marine birds through disturbances caused by helicopter
overflights. However, these disturbances are expected to be very
infrequent and temporary. Therefore, only minimal, short-term impacts
on bird populations and their flying patterns are expected.
[[Page 36928]]
Based on IODP SAS advice and guidance, mitigating measures will be
developed to prevent significant adverse effects to sensitive bird
species that may be present at specific drill sites. Overall, the
resulting impacts to birds in the preferred alternative are expected to
be minimal.
Threatened and Endangered Species
As indicated above, activities associated with the proposed action
will have minimal impacts on marine organisms including plankton,
cephalopods, fish, marine mammals, marine reptiles, and birds. This
conclusion also generally applies to endangered and threatened species
of those groups; however, any impacts to diminished populations or
limited ranges of threatened or endangered species will be greater than
impacts to non-endangered species.
The SODV will comply with all regulatory requirements pertaining to
threatened species such as the Endangered Species Act. The IODP SAS
review process will ensure that sufficient data is available to
identify critical species near the proposed drill sites and recommends
for implementation measures to mitigate potentially adverse impacts. If
a riserless drilling expedition is planned in an area where endangered
or threatened species may be adversely impacted or harmed, a
supplemental site-specific environmental review will be performed to
evaluate the risks of proceeding with the proposed action and to
develop recommendations to mitigate unacceptable risks.
SODV activities are generally not expected to result in substantial
loss or degradation of the functional habitats that may be used by
threatened and endangered species, nor are IODP riserless drilling
activities expected to result in the impedance of fish or wildlife
migration routes. Because of the sensitivity of some endangered
populations to the loss of even just one individual, if endangered
species, habitats or other critical breeding, feeding, or migratory
areas are not identified in advance, some impacts resulting from the
riserless drilling expeditions may have the potential to be
significant. Therefore, drilling will be avoided at locations where
outputs such as wastewater discharges, seafloor alteration, or
acoustical outputs have a greater potential to adversely impact local
biota, habitats, or disrupt behavior.
Biologically Sensitive Areas
Despite the deep locations that the SODV will operate, a majority
of the outputs associated with the operation of the vessels will occur
near the surface and hundreds of meters away from sensitive communities
and structures on the seafloor, such as coral reefs, hydrothermal vent
(chemosynthetic) communities, and seamounts. Therefore, these types of
outputs are not expected to result in significant impacts to these
resources. Noise and vibrations generated by the operation of the SODV
are expected to attenuate sufficiently with distance from the source to
prevent most aquatic organisms from being exposed to noise levels that
would result in adverse physiological effects. Although noise produced
by the SODV during riserless drilling activities has the potential to
displace sensitive marine organisms from their community, it is
anticipated that these effects would only be realized during the
relatively short period of time the vessel is on-site and drilling.
Because affected organisms in biologically sensitive areas are expected
to return once the vessel leaves the area, the resulting behavioral
effects are considered minimal and short term in duration.
Similar to threatened or endangered species, the IODP SAS review
process will ensure that sufficient data is available to identify
biological resources in sensitive ecosystems that may be adversely
affected by the proposed drilling activities and will recommend
appropriate site-specific restrictions or best management practices
accordingly. For example, chemosynthetic communities may be unlikely to
recover rapidly from drilling mud deposition, increased turbidity, or
changes to substrates in the localized area surrounding the borehole.
If the appropriate restrictions are not implemented, long-term impacts
to these deepwater communities may potentially occur, with recovery
times as long as 200 years for mature tube worm communities. Similarly,
prolonged exposure of coral reefs to sediment build-up, at any depth,
would have a negative impact on growth and long-term survival.
Due to the diverse characteristics associated with seamounts, the
potential impacts from the drilling operation in or near these
structures could vary quite widely. Certain portions of the seamount
would likely be less susceptible to severe impacts from the drilling of
a borehole. The potential impacts associated with drilling on or near
seamounts are very similar to those described for benthic organisms.
Nonetheless, because seamounts represent such a diverse and in many
cases slow growing ecosystem, the drilling impacts could be significant
if they result in substantial alteration or destruction of habitat that
prevents re-establishment of biologically significant communities.
If a riserless drilling expedition is planned in an area where
biologically sensitive organisms may be adversely impacted or harmed, a
supplemental site-specific environmental review will be performed to
evaluate the risks of proceeding with the proposed action and
recommendations to mitigate unacceptable risks or select alternate
sites will be developed.
Commercial and Native Fisheries and Aquaculture
To the extent that impacts to marine fish species resulting from
the proposed riserless drilling operations affect the subsistence value
of fish used by individuals as a food source or the commercial
harvesting of important species, there will be an impact to fisheries
and aquaculture. However, the potential for impacts to open ocean and
coastal marine fish resulting from both the presence of the SODV and
the riserless drilling activities are not expected to be significant
regardless of location.
Due to the mobility of fish and thus their ability to avoid
disturbances in their habits, impact to fisheries will be limited
primarily to impacts such as disturbances to schooling fish or the
smothering of food sources (e.g., plankton) or demersal eggs with
drilling sediments. Considering the temporary nature of the drilling
activity and the small area of the sea affected, overall impacts to
marine fisheries and aquaculture are expected to be minimal.
Appropriate best management practices will be implemented to
protect fishery resources. For example, permanent structures installed
on the seafloor such as observatories will be designed to be trawl-
resistant to prevent damage to fishing nets in areas where extensive
bottom trawling occurs. If a riserless drilling expedition is planned
in an area where fisheries or aquaculture may be adversely impacted or
harmed, a supplemental site-specific environmental review will be
performed to evaluate the risks and develop recommendations to mitigate
unacceptable risks or select alternate sites.
Marine Vessel Transport and Trade Routes
Because ship traffic within a geographic area is generally related
to the region's proximity to trade routes between the world's major
ports, the potential impacts associated with SODV
[[Page 36929]]
operations will be variable and dependent on the drilling location.
Through normal expedition planning or vessel operations, potential
interferences with marine transportation at any given site are expected
to be minimal. When transiting or stationary at a drill site, the SODV
will comply with all international conventions and regulations
pertaining to navigational safety. When dynamically positioned at a
drill site, the SODV, by nature of the activity, will be required to
remain stationary and essentially ``tethered'' to the seafloor by the
drilling equipment. All approaching large maritime vessels will be able
to establish radar and/or visual contact with the SODV well in advance
of any potential collision. When the SODV is positioned at a drill
site, it will be the responsibility of the approaching vessel to choose
a course which avoids a collision. However, the SODV will maintain
visual and radar vigilance of pending traffic conflicts and communicate
accordingly via radio and other means. In addition, the SODV will
display universally-recognized maritime signal flags while drilling,
indicating the vessel has restricted ability to maneuver.
Cultural Resources
A majority of IODP-USIO riserless drilling activities will be
conducted in water depths greater than 500 m. Therefore, most of the
mapped historical and cultural resources, which are generally located
in relatively shallow coastal waters, will in all likelihood not be
affected by the proposed activity. However, there are undoubtedly
untold numbers of undiscovered shipwrecks and other culturally
significant artifacts lying at great depth throughout the world's
oceans, particularly along historic trade routes.
The comprehensive review and planning process involving the IODP
SAS, the EPSP, and other review panels will evaluate each proposed
riserless drilling expedition. The site characterization data in the
site survey data packages will include information on known (mapped)
cultural resources. If proposed drill sites are located near known or
suspected cultural resource sites, recommendations will be made to
either select alternate drill sites or implement mitigating measures to
prevent damaging or destroying these resources.
Catastrophic Events
The primary output resulting from a catastrophic event related to
the SODV itself or drilling into a geological source would be the
uncontrolled release of petroleum hydrocarbons to the marine
environment. Based on IODP-USIO riserless drilling experience, the
probability of a major spill or catastrophic release of petroleum from
the SODV or a geological source is very low. This is readily
demonstrated by 21 years of ODP/IODP experience involving riserless
drilling of more than 1,900 boreholes without a major spill of fuel
from the vessel or accidental release of hydrocarbons from a geologic
source.
Building further upon this experience, it is anticipated that this
record of preventing catastrophic releases will continue with future
SODV expeditions. The IODP SAS comprehensive review and advisory
process combined with the stringent program of continuous real-time
monitoring of hydrocarbon potential while drilling will further reduce
the risk of an uncontrolled release of hydrocarbons from a geologic
source to an extremely low level. Input from the IODP SAS review
process may also include recommendations for site-specific mitigating
measures such as additional detection tools (e.g., logging while
drilling, measurement while drilling) and the availability of resources
to respond to signs of geologic hazards. For example, the IODP SAS may
recommend the availability of heavy drilling mud at certain drills
sites which could quickly be deployed to abandon a borehole or seal
specific stratigraphic intervals, thereby ensuring a maximum level of
protection from potential petroleum releases.
Severe weather represents a significant condition that could
threaten vessel operations and contribute to a catastrophic release of
petroleum. For example, if the ship were to be blown off a drill site
during a severe storm without ample time to retrieve the drill string,
the drill string could be lost and the ship may be severely damaged if
it grounded in shallow water or onshore. Through best management
practices including the operational planning process for each
expedition and continuously monitoring ever-changing weather
conditions, the SODV will be able to avoid environmental conditions
which could contribute to the catastrophic release of petroleum from
the vessel.
During drilling, if conditions suggesting the possible release of
petroleum hydrocarbons or other gasses (e.g., hydrogen sulfide) are
detected during SODV operations, drilling will immediately cease and a
series of pre-defined control measures will be implemented to stabilize
and seal the borehole thereby avoiding an uncontrolled release to the
marine environment. It is possible, though unlikely, that riserless
drilling may penetrate a thin, relatively undetectable petroleum layer,
resulting in its release from the borehole to the marine environment.
In this instance, the amount of material released would be minimal.
Impact Summary
The majority of identified potential environmental impacts are
short term in duration, of local extent, and minimal intensity, with
most impacts unlikely to occur. Unavoidable impacts focus around the
effects of the drilling activity itself, and include drill cuttings
deposited on the seafloor around the borehole and fine grained
particles suspended in the water column or deposited on the seafloor in
the borehole vicinity. Drilling locations will be sited so as to
minimize these unavoidable impacts. Impacts with the most severe
consequences--oil and gas releases from either a fuel spill from the
drilling vessel or from a blowout caused by drilling into a pressurized
geological source--have not occurred in 40 years of DSDP, ODP, or IODP
operations (1968-2008), and are judged highly unlikely to occur. Table
1 identifies the outputs associated with the preferred alternative and
summarizes the significance of each potential impact.
Impact Mitigation
During each riserless drilling expedition, Best Management
Practices (BMPs) and site-specific mitigating measures will be
implemented that are intended to effectively reduce or avoid impacts to
the environment. The IODP-USIO will be responsible for implementing
these measures and assuring compliance by all applicable IODP-USIO
participants (e.g., contractors, field personnel, researchers).
Additionally, using 30 years of riserless drilling experience, the
IODP-USIO will continue to refine and implement various BMPs and
mitigating measures to reduce or avoid adverse impacts to marine
organisms and the physical environment.
BMPs represent routine actions that may be performed during
riserless drilling expeditions including measures that involve every
phase of IODP-USIO operations. Many of the BMPs have already been
incorporated into the operating procedures that will be used by the
IODP-USIO, and have been designed to complement the IODP's core
environmental principles to (1) Protect marine life and environment,
(2) dispose waste materials consistent with applicable standards, (3)
store and transport samples in such a way as to prevent contamination
of the
[[Page 36930]]
environment, and (4) keeping the public informed such as through the
dissemination of the PEIS.
Table 1.--Summary of Potential Impacts From IODP-USIO Riserless Ocean Drilling
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Environmental impacts
Affected -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Process/activity Output environment Probability of Severity
Duration Extent Intensity an impact rating
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operate the SODV (vessel in Discharges Water Quality Short term....... Local........... Minimal......... Unlikely........ 1
transit and at a drill site (treated Seafloor.
using thrusters for dynamic wastewater,
positioning; note: Impacts greywater,
associated with drilling and treated
coring activities are bilgewater, deck
summarized below). drainage,
ballast water,
treated lab
discharges).
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No environmental impacts 0
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Biological Resources
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Typical.......... Short term....... Local........... Minimal......... Unlikely........ 2
Sensitive Areas.. Short term....... Local........... Minimal......... Unlikely........ 2
Fisheries........ Short term....... Local........... Minimal......... Unlikely........ 1
Physical Water Quality.... Short term....... Local........... Minimal......... Unlikely........ 1
Disturbances.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seafloor......... No environmental impacts 0
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marine Traffic... Short term....... Local........... Minimal......... Unlikely........ 1
Underwater Noise Acoustical Short term....... Local........... Minimal......... Unlikely........ 2
(operation of Environment.
vessel engines,
generators,
thrusters,
mechanical
systems,
instruments,
transponder
beacons).
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Biological Resources
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Typical.......... Short term....... Local........... Minimal......... Unlikely........ 1
Sensitive Areas.. Short term....... Local........... Minimal......... Unlikely........ 1
Fisheries........ Short term....... Local........... Minimal......... Unlikely........ 1
Air Emissions:
Exhaust Air Quality...... Short term....... Local........... Minimal......... Unlikely........ 1
& vapors.
Air Quality...... Short term....... Local........... Minimal......... Unlikely........ 1
Laboratory.
Hazardous Vessel Crew & Continuous....... (Not Applicable) Minimal......... Unlikely........ 0
Materials Resources.
(storage & use).
Solid & Hazardous Vessel Crew & Continuous....... (Not Applicable) Minimal......... Unlikely........ 0
Waste (handle, Resources.
store,
incinerate).
Conduct Riserless Drilling and Discharges Water Quality.... Short term....... Local; seawater Minimal......... Certain......... 2
Coring (in addition to (seawater drilling fluid
impacts associated with the drilling fluid, injected into
operation of the SODV). sediment the borehole at
displaced from <=1,900 L/min;
the borehole, fine grain
drilling mud, particles
cement, tracers). suspended in
the water
column may
extend 100+ m
from the
borehole.
Seafloor......... Short term....... Local; fine Minimal......... Certain......... 2
grain particles
deposited
within 100+ m
of the borehole.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Biological Resources
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Typical.......... Moderate......... Local; benthos & Minimal......... Possible........ 2
fish eggs/larva
may be
displaced.
[[Page 36931]]
Sensitive Areas.. Long term........ Local; habit may Moderate........ Unlikely........ 3
be disturbed.
Fisheries........ Short term....... Local; fish may Minimal......... Unlikely........ 2
be displaced.
Cultural Long term........ Local; Minimal......... Highly Unlikely. 3
Resources. deposition of
sediment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Physical Water Quality.... No environmental impacts 0
Disturbances.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seafloor......... Long term........ Local; drill Minimal......... Certain......... 3
cuttings mound
within ~5 m of
borehole.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Biological Resources
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Typical.......... Moderate......... Local; benthos Minimal......... Possible........ 3
may be
displaced or
smothered.
Sensitive Areas.. Moderate......... Local; benthos Moderate........ Unlikely........ 3
may be
displaced or
smothered.
Fisheries........ Moderate......... Local........... Minimal......... Unlikely........ 3
Marine Traffic... Short term....... Local........... Minimal......... Unlikely........ 1
Cultural Long term........ Local; damage or Minimal......... Highly Unlikely. 3
Resources. alteration.
Underwater Noise Acoustical Short term....... Local........... Minimal......... Unlikely........ 2
(operation of Environment.
vessel engines,
generators,
thrusters,
mechanical
systems,
instruments,
transponder
beacons,
drilling/coring).
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Biological Resources
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Typical.......... Short term....... Local........... Minimal......... Unlikely........ 1
Sensitive Areas.. Short term....... Local.