Temporary Safety Zone; Wreckage of the M/V NEW CARISSA, Pacific Ocean 3 Nautical Miles North of the Entrance to Coos Bay, OR, 36433-36435 [E8-14616]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 125 / Friday, June 27, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Section 165.T11–063 Security Zone;
Waters Adjacent 10th Avenue Marine
Terminal, San Diego, CA
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
(a) Location. The security zone
consists of the navigable waters
surrounding the 10th Avenue Marine
Terminal. The limits of this security
zone are more specifically defined as
the area enclosed by the following
points: Starting on shore at 32°42′15″ N
117°09′39″ W, then extending
southwesterly to 32°42′02″ N 117°09′51″
W, then southeasterly to 32°41′43″ N
117°09′25″ W, northeasterly to shore at
32°41′47″ N 117°09′20″ W and then
along the shoreline to starting point.
(b) Effective period. This section will
be in effect from 7 a.m. on June 25,
2008, to 7 p.m. on June 28, 2008. If the
need for the security zone ends before
the scheduled termination time, the
Captain of the Port San Diego will cease
enforcement of this security zone and
will announce that fact via Broadcast
Notice to Mariners.
(c) Regulations. In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.33 of
this part, entry into, transit through, or
anchoring within the security zone
described in paragraph (a) of this
section by all vessels is prohibited,
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port, or his designated representative.
All other general regulations of § 165.33
of this part apply in the security zone
established by this section.
(d) Enforcement. All persons and
vessels shall comply with the
instructions of the Coast Guard Captain
of the Port or the designated on-scene
patrol personnel. Patrol personnel can
be comprised of commissioned, warrant,
and petty officers of the Coast Guard
onboard Coast Guard, local, state, and
federal law enforcement vessels. Upon
being hailed by U.S. Coast Guard patrol
personnel by siren, radio, flashing light,
or other means, the operator of a vessel
shall proceed as directed. The U.S.
Coast Guard may be assisted in the
patrol and enforcement of this security
zone by the San Diego Harbor Police.
Coast Guard
Dated: June 18, 2008.
C.V. Strangfeld,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. E8–14613 Filed 6–26–08; 8:45 am]
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:06 Jun 26, 2008
Jkt 214001
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2008–0146]
RIN 1625–AA00
Temporary Safety Zone; Wreckage of
the M/V NEW CARISSA, Pacific Ocean
3 Nautical Miles North of the Entrance
to Coos Bay, OR
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary Final Rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on
the waters of the Pacific Ocean
encompassed in the 1000 yard radius
surrounding the wreckage of the M/V
NEW CARISSA located 3 NM north of
the entrance to Coos Bay, Oregon. The
Captain of the Port Portland is taking
this action to safeguard individuals and
vessels involved in a salvage operation
involving the M/V NEW CARISSA.
Entry into this safety zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port or his designated representative.
DATES: This regulation is effective from
10 a.m. June 5, 2008, to 11:59 p.m.
August 31, 2008, unless canceled earlier
through broadcast notice to mariners.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2008–
0146 and are available online at
https://www.regulations.gov. They are
also available for inspection or copying
at two locations: the Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays, and Coast
Guard Sector Portland, 6767 N. Basin
Ave., Portland, OR 97217 between 8
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
MST1 Lucia Mack, Waterways
Management, c/o Captain of the Port
Portland, 6767 N. Basin Ave, Portland,
OR 97217–3992, and (503) 240–9311.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) and
5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds
that good cause exists for not publishing
an NPRM and for making this rule
effective less than 30 days after
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
36433
publication in the Federal Register. The
Coast Guard was not given a start date
for this operation and just recently
became aware of its progress which did
not allow for prior notice. Publishing a
NPRM would be contrary to public
interest since immediate action is
necessary to allow for the safe salvage
of the wreckage of the M/V NEW
CARISSA which is aground upon a sand
bar in the Pacific Ocean 3 NM north of
the entrance to Coos Bay, Oregon. If
normal notice and comment procedures
were followed, this rule would not
become effective until after the date of
the salvage operation. For this reason,
following the normal rulemaking
procedures in this case would be
impracticable and contrary to the public
safety.
Background and Purpose
The Coast Guard is establishing a
temporary safety zone on the waters of
the Pacific Ocean encompassed in the
1000 yard radius surrounding the
wreckage of the M/V NEW CARISSA
located 3 NM north of the entrance to
Coos Bay, Oregon. Entry into this safety
zone is prohibited unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port or his designated
representative from 10 a.m. June 5,
2008, to 11:59 p.m. August 31, 2008,
unless canceled earlier through
broadcast notice to mariners.
The Captain of the Port Portland is
taking this action to safeguard
individuals and vessels involved in a
salvage operation involving the wreck of
the M/V NEW CARISSA. This safety
zone will be enforced by representatives
of the Captain of the Port Portland. The
Captain of the Port may be assisted by
other federal, state, and local agencies.
Discussion of Rule
This rule, for safety concerns, will
control vessels, personnel, and
individual movements on the waters of
the Pacific Ocean encompassed in the
1000 yard radius surrounding the
wreckage of the M/V NEW CARISSA
located 3 NM north of the entrance to
Coos Bay, Oregon as indicated in
section 2 of this Temporary Final Rule.
Entry into this safety zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port or his designated representative.
Coast Guard Personnel and local law
enforcement will enforce this safety
zone. The Captain of the Port may be
assisted by other federal and local
agencies.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
E:\FR\FM\27JNR1.SGM
27JNR1
36434
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 125 / Friday, June 27, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. The Coast Guard expects the
economic impact of this proposal to be
so minimal the full Regulatory
Evaluation under paragraph 10e of the
regulatory policies and procedures
unnecessary. This expectation is based
on the fact that the regulated areas
established by the proposed regulation
will involve a small area of the Pacific
Ocean along the Oregon Coast that
doesn’t have much vessel traffic. The
removal of the wreckage of the M/V
NEW CARISSA in a controlled and
deliberate operation ensures the safety
of future traffic in that the vessel will
not be allowed to deteriorate in a
fashion which could cause unknown
navigation hazards and/or additional
pollution in the area. The removal of the
wreck’s potential to create these
incidents will offset any potential
adverse economic impact these
restrictions might have.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), we have
considered whether this rule would
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit a small area
of the Pacific Ocean along the Oregon
Coast encompassed in the 1000 yard
radius surrounding the wreckage of the
M/V NEW CARISSA located 3 NM north
of the entrance to Coos Bay, Oregon.
Entry into this safety zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port or his designated representative.
This safety zone will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons: The safety zone
applies to a tiny portion of the Pacific
Ocean, entities wishing to transit in the
vicinity of this area may pass outside of
the safety zone to continue their transit.
We will issue a broadcast notice to
mariners on the effected portion of the
Pacific Ocean.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:06 Jun 26, 2008
Jkt 214001
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offer to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they may
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process. If
this rule will affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. Small businesses may
send comments on the actions of
Federal employees who enforce, or
otherwise determine compliance with,
Federal regulations to the Small
Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the
Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman
evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency’s responsiveness to
small business. If you wish to comment
on actions by employees of the Coast
Guard, call 1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–
734–3247). The Coast Guard will not
retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this rule or
any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule would not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
E:\FR\FM\27JNR1.SGM
27JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 125 / Friday, June 27, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD
and Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–
4370f), and have concluded, under the
Instruction, that there are no factors in
this case that would limit the use of a
categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this
rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(g), of the
Instruction, from further environmental
documentation because it establishes a
safety zone.
A final ‘‘Environmental Analysis
Check List’’ and a final ‘‘Categorical
Exclusion Determination’’ will be
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and Record Keeping
Requirements, Security Measures, and
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR parts 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
I 2. A temporary section in 165.T13–
035 is added to read as follows:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
§ 165.T13–035 Safety Zone: Wreckage of
the M/V NEW CARISSA, Pacific Ocean 3
Nautical Miles North of the Entrance to
Coos Bay, Oregon.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: The waters of the Pacific
Ocean encompassed by a 1000 yard
radius surrounding the wreckage of the
M/V NEW CARISSA located 3 NM north
of the entrance to Coos Bay, Oregon.
(b) Enforcement period. This rule will
be in effect from 10 a.m. June 05, 2008,
to 11:59 p.m. August 31, 2008.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:06 Jun 26, 2008
Jkt 214001
(c) Regulations. In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.23 of
this part, entry into this safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port or his designated
representative.
Dated: June 5, 2008.
F.G. Myer,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Portland.
[FR Doc. E8–14616 Filed 6–26–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2006–0130–200814; FRL–
8684–4]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans Florida;
Prevention of Significant Deterioration
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is taking final action to
conditionally approve revisions to the
Florida State Implementation Plan (SIP)
submitted by the State of Florida on
February 3, 2006. The SIP revisions
modify the Florida Prevention of
Significant Deterioration (PSD) program
to address changes to the federal new
source review (NSR) regulations, which
were promulgated by EPA on December
31, 2002, and reconsidered with minor
changes on November 7, 2003
(commonly referred to as the ‘‘2002 NSR
Reform Rules’’). In addition EPA is
approving Florida’s concurrent February
3, 2006, request to make the State’s PSD
permitting program applicable to
electric power plants, which are also
subject to the Florida Electrical Power
Plant Siting Act (PPSA). EPA proposed
conditional approval of these revisions
on April 4, 2008; no comments were
received on that proposal.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule will be
effective July 28, 2008.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA–R04–OAR–
2006–0130. All documents in the docket
are listed on the https://
www.regulations.gov Web site. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., Confidential
Business Information or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
36435
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically through https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Regulatory Development Section,
Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and
Toxics Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA
requests that if at all possible, you
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30
excluding federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
information regarding the Florida State
Implementation Plan, contact Ms. Heidi
LeSane, Regulatory Development
Section, Air Planning Branch, Air,
Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, Region 4, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 61 Forsyth Street,
SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. The
telephone number is (404) 562–9074.
Ms. LeSane can also be reached via
electronic mail at lesane.heidi@epa.gov.
For information regarding New Source
Review, contact Ms. Yolanda Adams,
Air Permits Section, at the same address
above. The telephone number is (404)
562–9214. Ms. Adams can also be
reached via electronic mail at
adams.yolanda@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. What action is EPA taking?
II. What is the background of EPA’s action on
the Florida PSD rule revisions?
III. What is the background of EPA’s action
on Florida’s PSD program for electric
power plants?
IV. Final Action
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What action is EPA taking?
NSR Reform Revisions. EPA is taking
final action to conditionally approve
revisions to the Florida SIP (Florida
Administrative Code (F.A.C.) Chapters
62–204, 62–210, and 62–212) as
submitted by the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection (FDEP) on
February 3, 2006, which included
changes to Florida’s PSD program. As
part of the current conditional approval,
Florida has agreed to (1) revise the
definition of ‘‘new emissions unit’’ to be
consistent with the federal definition or
revise the definition to define what is
meant by ‘‘beginning normal operation’’
and provide an equivalency
demonstration supporting the revised
definition; (2) revise the definition of
‘‘significant emissions rate’’ to include
ozone depleting substances; (3)
E:\FR\FM\27JNR1.SGM
27JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 125 (Friday, June 27, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 36433-36435]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-14616]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2008-0146]
RIN 1625-AA00
Temporary Safety Zone; Wreckage of the M/V NEW CARISSA, Pacific
Ocean 3 Nautical Miles North of the Entrance to Coos Bay, OR
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary Final Rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the
waters of the Pacific Ocean encompassed in the 1000 yard radius
surrounding the wreckage of the M/V NEW CARISSA located 3 NM north of
the entrance to Coos Bay, Oregon. The Captain of the Port Portland is
taking this action to safeguard individuals and vessels involved in a
salvage operation involving the M/V NEW CARISSA. Entry into this safety
zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or his
designated representative.
DATES: This regulation is effective from 10 a.m. June 5, 2008, to 11:59
p.m. August 31, 2008, unless canceled earlier through broadcast notice
to mariners.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2008-0146 and are available online
at https://www.regulations.gov. They are also available for inspection
or copying at two locations: the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays, and
Coast Guard Sector Portland, 6767 N. Basin Ave., Portland, OR 97217
between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: MST1 Lucia Mack, Waterways Management,
c/o Captain of the Port Portland, 6767 N. Basin Ave, Portland, OR
97217-3992, and (503) 240-9311.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) and 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for not publishing an NPRM and for
making this rule effective less than 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register. The Coast Guard was not given a start date for this
operation and just recently became aware of its progress which did not
allow for prior notice. Publishing a NPRM would be contrary to public
interest since immediate action is necessary to allow for the safe
salvage of the wreckage of the M/V NEW CARISSA which is aground upon a
sand bar in the Pacific Ocean 3 NM north of the entrance to Coos Bay,
Oregon. If normal notice and comment procedures were followed, this
rule would not become effective until after the date of the salvage
operation. For this reason, following the normal rulemaking procedures
in this case would be impracticable and contrary to the public safety.
Background and Purpose
The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the
waters of the Pacific Ocean encompassed in the 1000 yard radius
surrounding the wreckage of the M/V NEW CARISSA located 3 NM north of
the entrance to Coos Bay, Oregon. Entry into this safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or his
designated representative from 10 a.m. June 5, 2008, to 11:59 p.m.
August 31, 2008, unless canceled earlier through broadcast notice to
mariners.
The Captain of the Port Portland is taking this action to safeguard
individuals and vessels involved in a salvage operation involving the
wreck of the M/V NEW CARISSA. This safety zone will be enforced by
representatives of the Captain of the Port Portland. The Captain of the
Port may be assisted by other federal, state, and local agencies.
Discussion of Rule
This rule, for safety concerns, will control vessels, personnel,
and individual movements on the waters of the Pacific Ocean encompassed
in the 1000 yard radius surrounding the wreckage of the M/V NEW CARISSA
located 3 NM north of the entrance to Coos Bay, Oregon as indicated in
section 2 of this Temporary Final Rule. Entry into this safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or his
designated representative. Coast Guard Personnel and local law
enforcement will enforce this safety zone. The Captain of the Port may
be assisted by other federal and local agencies.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not
[[Page 36434]]
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. The Coast Guard expects the economic
impact of this proposal to be so minimal the full Regulatory Evaluation
under paragraph 10e of the regulatory policies and procedures
unnecessary. This expectation is based on the fact that the regulated
areas established by the proposed regulation will involve a small area
of the Pacific Ocean along the Oregon Coast that doesn't have much
vessel traffic. The removal of the wreckage of the M/V NEW CARISSA in a
controlled and deliberate operation ensures the safety of future
traffic in that the vessel will not be allowed to deteriorate in a
fashion which could cause unknown navigation hazards and/or additional
pollution in the area. The removal of the wreck's potential to create
these incidents will offset any potential adverse economic impact these
restrictions might have.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), we
have considered whether this rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of which
may be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit a small area of the Pacific Ocean along the Oregon Coast
encompassed in the 1000 yard radius surrounding the wreckage of the M/V
NEW CARISSA located 3 NM north of the entrance to Coos Bay, Oregon.
Entry into this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port or his designated representative. This safety zone
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities for the following reasons: The safety zone applies to a
tiny portion of the Pacific Ocean, entities wishing to transit in the
vicinity of this area may pass outside of the safety zone to continue
their transit. We will issue a broadcast notice to mariners on the
effected portion of the Pacific Ocean.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they may better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process. If this rule
will affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to the Small Business and
Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small
Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these
actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness to small
business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast
Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not
retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this
rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule would not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
[[Page 36435]]
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD
and Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 5100.1, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded,
under the Instruction, that there are no factors in this case that
would limit the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of
the Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation because it establishes a safety zone.
A final ``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a final
``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' will be available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and Record
Keeping Requirements, Security Measures, and Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR parts 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
0
2. A temporary section in 165.T13-035 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T13-035 Safety Zone: Wreckage of the M/V NEW CARISSA,
Pacific Ocean 3 Nautical Miles North of the Entrance to Coos Bay,
Oregon.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: The waters of
the Pacific Ocean encompassed by a 1000 yard radius surrounding the
wreckage of the M/V NEW CARISSA located 3 NM north of the entrance to
Coos Bay, Oregon.
(b) Enforcement period. This rule will be in effect from 10 a.m.
June 05, 2008, to 11:59 p.m. August 31, 2008.
(c) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec. 165.23 of this part, entry into this safety zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or his designated
representative.
Dated: June 5, 2008.
F.G. Myer,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Portland.
[FR Doc. E8-14616 Filed 6-26-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P