Special Conditions: Embraer S.A. Model EMB-500; Full Authority Digital Engine Control (FADEC) System., 35896-35898 [E8-14383]
Download as PDF
35896
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 25, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
m’= m, except for counterparties rated below BBB, where m’= 120
LG
UPBm
LG
< 0.78 and the loan group comprises conventional loans
MIExpm = 1 if LTVORIG ×
LG
UPBORIG
LG
MIExpm = 0 otherwise
0.78 (78%) = the LTV at which MI is cancelled if payments are current
*
*
*
*
*
3.6.3.6.5.1 * * *
[a] * * *
SF
LS m
MQ
× PTRm + F − MI m
R − RPm − ALCEm
1
12
= MAX
+
+
MF
MF + MR
MQ
DRm 6
DRm 6
DRm 6
1+
1 + 2
1 + 2
2
, 0
[b] * * *
2. * * *
*
*
*
Dated: June 10, 2008.
James B. Lockhart III,
Director, Office of Federal Housing Enterprise
Oversight.
[FR Doc. E8–13378 Filed 6–24–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4220–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 23
[Docket No. CE288; Special Conditions No.
23–228–SC]
Special Conditions: Embraer S.A.
Model EMB–500; Full Authority Digital
Engine Control (FADEC) System.
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions; request
for comments.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: These special conditions are
issued for the Embraer S.A. Model
EMB–500 airplane. This airplane will
have a novel or unusual design
feature(s) associated with the use of an
electronic engine control system instead
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:16 Jun 24, 2008
Jkt 214001
of a traditional mechanical control
system. The applicable airworthiness
regulations do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for this
design feature. These special conditions
contain the additional safety standards
that the Administrator considers
necessary to establish a level of safety
equivalent to that established by the
existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: The effective date of these
special conditions is June 16, 2008.
Comments must be received on or
before July 25, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Comments on these special
conditions may be mailed in duplicate
to: Federal Aviation Administration,
Regional Counsel, ACE–7, Attention:
Rules Docket CE288, 901 Locust, Room
506, Kansas City, Missouri 64106, or
delivered in duplicate to the Regional
Counsel at the above address.
Comments must be marked: CE288.
Comments may be inspected in the
Rules Docket weekdays, except Federal
holidays between 7:30 and 4 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Peter L. Rouse, Federal Aviation
Administration, Aircraft Certification
Service, Small Airplane Directorate,
ACE–111, 901 Locust, Room 301,
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Kansas City, Missouri 64106; 816–329–
4135, fax 816–329–4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA
has determined that notice and
opportunity for prior public comment
hereon are impracticable because these
procedures would significantly delay
issuance of the design approval and
thus delivery of the affected aircraft. In
addition, the substance of these special
conditions has been subject to the
public comment process in several prior
instances with no substantive comments
received. The FAA therefore finds that
good cause exists for making these
special conditions effective upon
issuance.
Comments Invited
Interested persons are invited to
submit such written data, views, or
arguments as they may desire.
Communications should identify the
regulatory docket or special condition
number and be submitted in duplicate
to the address specified above. All
communications received on or before
the closing date for comments will be
considered by the Administrator. The
special conditions may be changed in
light of the comments received. All
comments received will be available in
E:\FR\FM\25JNR1.SGM
25JNR1
ER25JN08.002
*
ER25JN08.001
*
ER25JN08.000
VA
LS m
1 + F + MQ × PTR + ( R − RP ) − 0.30
m
m
12
= max
, 0
MF
DRm 6
1 + 2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 25, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
the Rules Docket for examination by
interested persons, both before and after
the closing date for comments. A report
summarizing each substantive public
contact with FAA personnel concerning
this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket. Commenters wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments
submitted in response to this notice
must include a self-addressed, stamped
postcard on which the following
statement is made: ‘‘Comments to
Docket No. CE288.’’ The postcard will
be date stamped and returned to the
commenter.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
Background
On October 5, 2005, Embraer S.A.
applied for a type certificate for their
new Model EMB–500. The Model EMB–
500 is a normal category, low-winged
monoplane with ‘‘T’’ tailed vertical and
horizontal stabilizers, retractable
tricycle type landing gear and twin
turbofan engines mounted on the
aircraft fuselage. Its design
characteristics include a predominance
of metallic construction. The maximum
takeoff weight is 9,965 pounds, the VMO/
MMO is 275 KIAS/M 0.70 and maximum
altitude is 41,000 feet.
The Embraer S.A. Model EMB–500
airplane is equipped with Pratt &
Whitney Canada PW617F turbofan
engines using an electronic engine
control system instead of a traditional
mechanical control system. Even though
the engine control system will be
certificated as part of the engine, the
installation of an engine with an
electronic control system requires
evaluation due to critical environmental
effects and possible effects on or by
other airplane systems. For example,
indirect effects of lightning, radio
interference with other airplane
electronic systems, shared engine and
airplane data and power sources.
The regulatory requirements in 14
CFR part 23 for evaluating the
installation of complex systems,
including electronic systems and critical
environmental effects, are contained in
§ 23.1309. However, when § 23.1309
was developed, the use of electronic
control systems for engines was not
envisioned. Therefore, the § 23.1309
requirements were not applicable to
systems certificated as part of the engine
(reference § 23.1309(f)(1)). Although the
parts of the system that are not
certificated with the engine could be
evaluated using the criteria of § 23.1309,
the integral nature of systems such as
these makes it unfeasible to evaluate the
airplane portion of the system without
including the engine portion of the
system.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:16 Jun 24, 2008
Jkt 214001
In some cases, the airplane that the
engine is used in will determine a
higher classification (Advisory Circular
(AC) 23.1309) than the engine controls
are certificated for, which will require
that the FADEC/DEEC (Digital
Electronic Engine Control) systems be
analyzed at a higher classification. As of
November 2005 FADEC special
conditions will mandate the
classification for § 23.1309 analysis for
loss of FADEC control as catastrophic
for any airplane. This is not to imply
that an engine failure is classified as
catastrophic, but that the digital engine
control must provide an equivalent
reliability to mechanical engine
controls.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.17,
Embraer S.A. must show that the Model
EMB–500 meets the applicable
provisions of 14 CFR part 23, as
amended by Amendments 23–1 through
23–55, thereto.
If the Administrator finds that the
applicable airworthiness regulations
(i.e., 14 CFR part 23) do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for the Model EMB–500 because of a
novel or unusual design feature, special
conditions are prescribed under the
provisions of § 21.16.
In addition to the applicable
airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Model EMB–500 must
comply with the fuel vent and exhaust
emission requirements of 14 CFR part
34 and the noise certification
requirements of 14 CFR part 36, and the
FAA must issue a finding of regulatory
adequacy pursuant to section 611 of
Public Law 92–574, the ‘‘Noise Control
Act of 1972.’’
Special conditions, as appropriate, as
defined in 11.19, are issued in
accordance with § 11.38, and become
part of the type certification basis in
accordance with § 21.17(a)(2).
Special conditions are initially
applicable to the model for which they
are issued. Should the type certificate
for that model be amended later to
include any other model that
incorporates the same novel or unusual
design feature, the special conditions
would also apply to the other model
under the provisions of § 21.101.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Embraer S.A. Model EMB–500
will incorporate the following novel or
unusual design features: Electronic
engine control system.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special
conditions are applicable to the Model
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
35897
EMB–500. Should Embraer S.A. apply at
a later date for a change to the type
certificate to include another model
incorporating the same novel or unusual
design feature, the special conditions
would apply to that model as well
under the provisions of § 21.101.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel
or unusual design features on one model
(Model EMB–500) of airplane. It is not
a rule of general applicability, and it
affects only the applicant who applied
to the FAA for approval of these features
on the airplane.
Under standard practice, the effective
date of final special conditions would
be 30 days after the date of publication
in the Federal Register; however, as the
certification date for the Embraer S.A.
Model EMB–500 is imminent, the FAA
finds that good cause exists to make
these special conditions effective upon
issuance.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 23
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Signs and
symbols.
Citation
The authority citation for these
special conditions is as follows:
I
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113 and
44701; 14 CFR 21.16 and 21.17; and 14 CFR
11.38 and 11.19.
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the following special conditions are
issued as part of the type certification
basis for Embraer S.A. Model EMB–500
airplanes.
1. Electronic Engine Control.
The installation of the electronic
engine control system must comply
with the requirements of § 23.1309(a)
through (e) at Amendment 23–55. The
intent of this requirement is not to
reevaluate the inherent hardware
reliability of the control itself, but rather
determine the effects, including
environmental effects addressed in
§ 23.1309(e), on the airplane systems
and engine control system when
installing the control on the airplane.
When appropriate, engine certification
data may be used when showing
compliance with this requirement;
however, the effects of the installation
on this data must be addressed.
For these evaluations, the loss of
FADEC control will be analyzed
utilizing the threat levels associated
with a catastrophic failure.
I
E:\FR\FM\25JNR1.SGM
25JNR1
35898
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 25, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on June
16, 2008.
James E. Jackson,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–14383 Filed 6–24–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2008–0331; Directorate
Identifier 2008–CE–009–AD; Amendment
39–15569; AD 2008–13–06]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Cessna
Aircraft Company Models 208 and
208B Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA adopts a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Cessna Aircraft Company (Cessna)
Models 208 and 208B airplanes. This
AD requires you to inspect the left and
right wing wire bundle(s) and repair or
replace damaged wire. This AD also
requires inspecting the wire bundles for
correct attachment to the anchor points
and correcting any deficient
attachments. This AD results from
chafed wiring found on wire bundles in
the left and right wings containing the
auto-control wing de-ice system, fuel
quantity indication, and low fuel
annunciation on the Cessna 208B
airplanes. Improper installation of wire
bundle supporting hardware can cause
chafed wiring in the affected bundles.
We are issuing this AD to detect and
correct damaged wiring of the autocontrol wing de-ice system, fuel
quantity indication, and low fuel
annunciation systems. This condition
could result in incorrect fuel quantity
indications, loss of low fuel quantity
annunciations, or loss of the autocontrol
wing de-ice system.
DATES: This AD becomes effective on
July 30, 2008.
On July 30, 2008, the Director of the
Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of certain
publications listed in this AD.
ADDRESSES: To get the service
information identified in this AD,
contact Cessna Aircraft Company, One
Cessna Boulevard, P.O. Box 7706,
Wichita, KS 67277–7704; telephone:
(316) 517–5800; fax: (316) 942–9006.
To view the AD docket, go to U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590, or on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov. The docket
number is FAA–2008–0331; Directorate
Identifier 2008–CE–009–AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Daniel Hilton, Aerospace Engineer, 1801
Airport Road, Room 100, Wichita,
Kansas 67209; telephone: (316) 946–
4173; fax: (316) 946–4107.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
On March 11, 2008, we issued a
proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to
include an AD that would apply to
certain Cessna Model 208 and 208B
airplanes. This proposal was published
in the Federal Register as a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) on March
17, 2008 (73 FR 14191). The NPRM
proposed to detect and correct damaged
wiring of the auto-control wing de-ice
system, fuel quantity indication, and
low fuel annunciation systems.
Comments
We provided the public the
opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the
comments received on the proposal and
FAA’s response to each comment:
Comment Issue: Allow More Time for
Service Bulletin
The Aircraft Owners and Pilots
Association (AOPA) comments that they
believe the issuance of an AD on the
wiring bundles of the Cessna 208 is
premature. The AOPA comments that it
believes a service bulletin is an effective
way to correct the wiring bundle issues,
and FAA should have allowed more
time for the service bulletin, dated
February 4, 2008, to be distributed to
Cessna 208 owners and mechanics. The
commenter adds that if after a
reasonable amount of time the service
bulletin is not appropriately addressing
the safety concern, then the FAA could
issue a special airworthiness
information bulletin (SAIB) or an AD.
We do not concur with the AOPA
comment. Mandatory service bulletins
and their process thereof do not
constitute rulemaking for owners/
operators to complete the requested
action. The only enforceable process to
assure that the unsafe condition is
properly addressed on all aircraft is
through the rulemaking process, in this
case an AD.
We are making no changes to the final
rule based on this comment.
Conclusion
We have carefully reviewed the
available data and determined that air
safety and the public interest require
adopting the AD as proposed except for
minor editorial corrections. We have
determined that these minor
corrections:
• Are consistent with the intent that
was proposed in the NPRM for
correcting the unsafe condition; and
• Do not add any additional burden
upon the public than was already
proposed in the NPRM.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 512
airplanes in the U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to do
the inspection:
Labor cost
Parts cost
Total cost
per
airplane
Total cost on
U.S. operators
1 work-hour × $80 per hour = $80 .................................................................
Not Applicable ....................................
$80
$40,960
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
We estimate the following costs to do
any necessary repairs that would be
required based on the results of the
inspection. We have no way of
determining the number of airplanes
that may need this repair/replacement:
Labor cost
Parts cost
Total cost per
airplane
1 work-hour × $80 per hour = $80 ..................................................................................................................................
$10
$90
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:16 Jun 24, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\25JNR1.SGM
25JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 123 (Wednesday, June 25, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 35896-35898]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-14383]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 23
[Docket No. CE288; Special Conditions No. 23-228-SC]
Special Conditions: Embraer S.A. Model EMB-500; Full Authority
Digital Engine Control (FADEC) System.
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: These special conditions are issued for the Embraer S.A. Model
EMB-500 airplane. This airplane will have a novel or unusual design
feature(s) associated with the use of an electronic engine control
system instead of a traditional mechanical control system. The
applicable airworthiness regulations do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for this design feature. These special
conditions contain the additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety
equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: The effective date of these special conditions is June 16, 2008.
Comments must be received on or before July 25, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Comments on these special conditions may be mailed in
duplicate to: Federal Aviation Administration, Regional Counsel, ACE-7,
Attention: Rules Docket CE288, 901 Locust, Room 506, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106, or delivered in duplicate to the Regional Counsel at
the above address. Comments must be marked: CE288. Comments may be
inspected in the Rules Docket weekdays, except Federal holidays between
7:30 and 4 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peter L. Rouse, Federal Aviation
Administration, Aircraft Certification Service, Small Airplane
Directorate, ACE-111, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; 816-329-4135, fax 816-329-4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA has determined that notice and
opportunity for prior public comment hereon are impracticable because
these procedures would significantly delay issuance of the design
approval and thus delivery of the affected aircraft. In addition, the
substance of these special conditions has been subject to the public
comment process in several prior instances with no substantive comments
received. The FAA therefore finds that good cause exists for making
these special conditions effective upon issuance.
Comments Invited
Interested persons are invited to submit such written data, views,
or arguments as they may desire. Communications should identify the
regulatory docket or special condition number and be submitted in
duplicate to the address specified above. All communications received
on or before the closing date for comments will be considered by the
Administrator. The special conditions may be changed in light of the
comments received. All comments received will be available in
[[Page 35897]]
the Rules Docket for examination by interested persons, both before and
after the closing date for comments. A report summarizing each
substantive public contact with FAA personnel concerning this
rulemaking will be filed in the docket. Commenters wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments submitted in response to this
notice must include a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the
following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket No. CE288.'' The
postcard will be date stamped and returned to the commenter.
Background
On October 5, 2005, Embraer S.A. applied for a type certificate for
their new Model EMB-500. The Model EMB-500 is a normal category, low-
winged monoplane with ``T'' tailed vertical and horizontal stabilizers,
retractable tricycle type landing gear and twin turbofan engines
mounted on the aircraft fuselage. Its design characteristics include a
predominance of metallic construction. The maximum takeoff weight is
9,965 pounds, the VMO/MMO is 275 KIAS/M 0.70 and
maximum altitude is 41,000 feet.
The Embraer S.A. Model EMB-500 airplane is equipped with Pratt &
Whitney Canada PW617F turbofan engines using an electronic engine
control system instead of a traditional mechanical control system. Even
though the engine control system will be certificated as part of the
engine, the installation of an engine with an electronic control system
requires evaluation due to critical environmental effects and possible
effects on or by other airplane systems. For example, indirect effects
of lightning, radio interference with other airplane electronic
systems, shared engine and airplane data and power sources.
The regulatory requirements in 14 CFR part 23 for evaluating the
installation of complex systems, including electronic systems and
critical environmental effects, are contained in Sec. 23.1309.
However, when Sec. 23.1309 was developed, the use of electronic
control systems for engines was not envisioned. Therefore, the Sec.
23.1309 requirements were not applicable to systems certificated as
part of the engine (reference Sec. 23.1309(f)(1)). Although the parts
of the system that are not certificated with the engine could be
evaluated using the criteria of Sec. 23.1309, the integral nature of
systems such as these makes it unfeasible to evaluate the airplane
portion of the system without including the engine portion of the
system.
In some cases, the airplane that the engine is used in will
determine a higher classification (Advisory Circular (AC) 23.1309) than
the engine controls are certificated for, which will require that the
FADEC/DEEC (Digital Electronic Engine Control) systems be analyzed at a
higher classification. As of November 2005 FADEC special conditions
will mandate the classification for Sec. 23.1309 analysis for loss of
FADEC control as catastrophic for any airplane. This is not to imply
that an engine failure is classified as catastrophic, but that the
digital engine control must provide an equivalent reliability to
mechanical engine controls.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.17, Embraer S.A. must show that
the Model EMB-500 meets the applicable provisions of 14 CFR part 23, as
amended by Amendments 23-1 through 23-55, thereto.
If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness
regulations (i.e., 14 CFR part 23) do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for the Model EMB-500 because of a novel
or unusual design feature, special conditions are prescribed under the
provisions of Sec. 21.16.
In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Model EMB-500 must comply with the fuel vent and
exhaust emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34 and the noise
certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36, and the FAA must issue a
finding of regulatory adequacy pursuant to section 611 of Public Law
92-574, the ``Noise Control Act of 1972.''
Special conditions, as appropriate, as defined in 11.19, are issued
in accordance with Sec. 11.38, and become part of the type
certification basis in accordance with Sec. 21.17(a)(2).
Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which
they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model be amended
later to include any other model that incorporates the same novel or
unusual design feature, the special conditions would also apply to the
other model under the provisions of Sec. 21.101.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Embraer S.A. Model EMB-500 will incorporate the following novel
or unusual design features: Electronic engine control system.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to the
Model EMB-500. Should Embraer S.A. apply at a later date for a change
to the type certificate to include another model incorporating the same
novel or unusual design feature, the special conditions would apply to
that model as well under the provisions of Sec. 21.101.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features
on one model (Model EMB-500) of airplane. It is not a rule of general
applicability, and it affects only the applicant who applied to the FAA
for approval of these features on the airplane.
Under standard practice, the effective date of final special
conditions would be 30 days after the date of publication in the
Federal Register; however, as the certification date for the Embraer
S.A. Model EMB-500 is imminent, the FAA finds that good cause exists to
make these special conditions effective upon issuance.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 23
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Signs and symbols.
Citation
0
The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113 and 44701; 14 CFR 21.16 and
21.17; and 14 CFR 11.38 and 11.19.
The Special Conditions
0
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special conditions are issued as part of
the type certification basis for Embraer S.A. Model EMB-500 airplanes.
1. Electronic Engine Control.
The installation of the electronic engine control system must
comply with the requirements of Sec. 23.1309(a) through (e) at
Amendment 23-55. The intent of this requirement is not to reevaluate
the inherent hardware reliability of the control itself, but rather
determine the effects, including environmental effects addressed in
Sec. 23.1309(e), on the airplane systems and engine control system
when installing the control on the airplane. When appropriate, engine
certification data may be used when showing compliance with this
requirement; however, the effects of the installation on this data must
be addressed.
For these evaluations, the loss of FADEC control will be analyzed
utilizing the threat levels associated with a catastrophic failure.
[[Page 35898]]
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on June 16, 2008.
James E. Jackson,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-14383 Filed 6-24-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P