Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model DHC-8-400 Series Airplanes, 35902-35904 [E8-13921]

Download as PDF 35902 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 25, 2008 / Rules and Regulations (4) For engines with 2,500 or less hours of operating time, before it accumulates 4,000 hours of operating time, but not later than September 30, 2008, inspect LP compressor fan blades and replace any blade that is found to be under-minimum material condition. Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on June 13, 2008. Peter A. White, Assistant Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. E8–13854 Filed 6–24–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P Previous Credit (f) Inspection of the fan blades for an under-minimum material condition done before the effective date of this AD that used P&WC ASB PW300–72–A24588, dated August 24, 2007; or Revision 1, dated October 26, 2007; or P&WC SB PW300–72– 24595, dated October 26, 2007; or Revision 1, dated November 28, 2007, comply with the requirements specified in this AD. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Other FAA AD Provisions RIN 2120–AA64 (g) The following provisions also apply to this AD: (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, Engine Certification Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. (2) Special Flight Permits: We are limiting Special Flight Permits to one repositioning maintenance flight to facilitate the subject inspection. Related Information (h) Refer to Transport Canada Airworthiness Directive CF–2008–08R1, dated March 18, 2008; P&WC ASB PW300– 72–A24588, Revision 2, dated November 27, 2007; and P&WC SB PW300–72–24595, Revision 1, dated November 28, 2007, for related information. (i) Contact Ian Dargin, Aerospace Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; email: ian.dargin@faa.gov; telephone (781) 238–7178; fax (781) 238–7199, for more information about this AD. jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES Material Incorporated by Reference (j) You must use Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. Alert Service Bulletin PW300–72– A24588, Revision 2, dated November 27, 2007, to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of this service information under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp., 1000 Marie-Victorin, Longueuil, Quebec, Canada J4G 1A1, telephone: (800) 268–8000. (3) You may review copies at the FAA, New England Region, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA; or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call (202) 741–6030, or go to: https:// www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html. VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:16 Jun 24, 2008 Jkt 214001 Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2008–0360; Directorate Identifier 2007–NM–368–AD; Amendment 39–15570; AD 2008–13–07] Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model DHC–8–400 Series Airplanes Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as: Several production aircraft have been found with the elevator overload bungees installed in reverse orientation: i.e., larger end outboard rather than inboard. This bungee reversal does not impact normal operation of the elevator, and would not increase the probability of an elevator disconnect. However, if a bungee became disconnected at the inboard side, the corresponding side of the elevator may not center, and this could adversely affect the pitch control of the aircraft. Loss of elevator pitch control could result in reduced controllability of the airplane. We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe condition on these products. DATES: This AD becomes effective July 30, 2008. The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of July 30, 2008. ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https:// www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M–30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC. PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fabio Buttitta, Aerospace Engineer, Systems and Flight Test Branch, ANE– 172, FAA, New York Aircraft Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York 11590; telephone (516) 228–7303; fax (516) 794–5531. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Discussion We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products. That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on March 28, 2008 (73 FR 16577). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI states: Several production aircraft have been found with the elevator overload bungees installed in reverse orientation: i.e., larger end outboard rather than inboard. This bungee reversal does not impact normal operation of the elevator, and would not increase the probability of an elevator disconnect. However, if a bungee became disconnected at the inboard side, the corresponding side of the elevator may not center, and this could adversely affect the pitch control of the aircraft. Loss of elevator pitch control could result in reduced controllability of the airplane. Corrective action includes a visual inspection for correct installation of the elevator overload bungees, reinstallation if necessary, and installation of labels to the elevator overload bungees. You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket. Comments We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of the cost to the public. Conclusion We reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed. Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information E:\FR\FM\25JNR1.SGM 25JNR1 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 25, 2008 / Rules and Regulations provided in the MCAI and related service information. We might also have required different actions in this AD from those in the MCAI in order to follow our FAA policies. Any such differences are highlighted in a NOTE within the AD. Costs of Compliance We estimate that this AD will affect 38 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it will take 1 work-hour per product to comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate is $80 per work-hour. Required parts will cost about $36 per product. Where the service information lists required parts costs that are covered under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no charge for these parts. As we do not control warranty coverage for affected parties, some parties may incur costs higher than estimated here. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD to the U.S. operators to be $4,408, or $116 per product. Authority for This Rulemaking Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA’s authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more detail the scope of the Agency’s authority. We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.’’ Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES Regulatory Findings We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD: 1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866; VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:16 Jun 24, 2008 Jkt 214001 2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and 3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket. Examining the AD Docket You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https:// www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. Adoption of the Amendment Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows: I PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: I Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. § 39.13 [Amended] 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding the following new AD: I 2008–13–07 Bombardier, Inc. (Formerly de Havilland, Inc.): Amendment 39–15570. Docket No. FAA–2008–0360; Directorate Identifier 2007–NM–368–AD. Effective Date (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective July 30, 2008. Affected ADs (b) None. Applicability (c) This AD applies to Bombardier Model DHC–8–400, DHC–8–401, and DHC–8–402 airplanes; certificated in any category; having serial numbers 4003 and subsequent. Subject (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 27: Flight controls. PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 35903 Reason (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) states: Several production aircraft have been found with the elevator overload bungees installed in reverse orientation: i.e., larger end outboard rather than inboard. This bungee reversal does not impact normal operation of the elevator, and would not increase the probability of an elevator disconnect. However, if a bungee became disconnected at the inboard side, the corresponding side of the elevator may not center, and this could adversely affect the pitch control of the aircraft. Loss of elevator pitch control could result in reduced controllability of the airplane. Corrective action includes a visual inspection for correct installation of the elevator overload bungees, reinstallation if necessary, and installation of labels to the elevator overload bungees. Actions and Compliance (f) For airplanes having serial numbers 4003, 4004, 4006, and 4008 through 4159: unless already done, do the following actions. (1) Within 5,000 flight hours after the effective date of this AD: Visually inspect both left and right elevator overload bungees, part number (P/N) FE289000000, to determine if they are correctly installed, in accordance with Bombardier Service Bulletin 84–27–30, Revision ‘C,’ dated October 31, 2007. If any bungee is found installed incorrectly, remove the bungee and re-install it correctly before the next flight in accordance with the service bulletin. (2) Within 5,000 flight hours after the effective date of this AD: Attach label, P/N FE289006200, to both left and right elevator overload bungees to show the correct orientation of the outboard end in accordance with Bombardier Service Bulletin 84–27–30, Revision ‘C,’ dated October 31, 2007. (3) Within 5,000 flight hours after the effective date of this AD: Re-identify the P/ N to read ‘‘FE289000001’’ on the identification plate of both the left and right elevator overload bungees in accordance with Bombardier Service Bulletin 84–27–30, Revision ‘C,’ dated October 31, 2007. (4) Actions accomplished before the effective date of this AD in accordance with Bombardier Service Bulletin 84–27–27, dated May 24, 2005, are acceptable for compliance with the corresponding actions specified in paragraphs (f)(1), (f)(2), and (f)(3) of this AD. (5) Actions accomplished before the effective date of this AD in accordance with Bombardier Service Bulletin 84–27–30, dated February 8, 2007; Revision ‘A,’ dated March 2, 2007; or Revision ‘B,’ dated May 3, 2007; are acceptable for compliance with the corresponding actions specified in this AD. Note 1: Paragraphs (f)(2) and (f)(3) of this AD constitute Modsum 4–113537. (g) For all airplanes: As of the effective date of this AD, no replacement/spare elevator overload bungees, P/N FE289000000, are permitted to be installed on any airplane. Only elevator overload bungees identified with new P/N E:\FR\FM\25JNR1.SGM 25JNR1 35904 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 25, 2008 / Rules and Regulations ‘‘FE289000001’’ on the identification plate are permitted to be installed. Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 7, 2008. Michael Kaszycki, Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. E8–13921 Filed 6–24–08; 8:45 am] FAA AD Differences Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information as follows: No differences. BILLING CODE 4910–13–P Other FAA AD Provisions (h) The following provisions also apply to this AD: (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Fabio Buttitta, Aerospace Engineer, Systems and Flight Test Branch, ANE–172, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York 11590; telephone (516) 228–7303; fax (516) 794–5531. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO. (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority (or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product is airworthy before it is returned to service. (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120–0056. Related Information (i) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF–2007–30, dated November 28, 2007; and Bombardier Service Bulletin 84– 27–30, Revision ‘C,’ dated October 31, 2007; for related information. jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES Material Incorporated by Reference (j) You must use Bombardier Service Bulletin 84–27–30, Revision ‘C,’ dated October 31, 2007, to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of this service information under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact Bombardier, Inc., Bombardier Regional Aircraft Division, 123 Garratt Boulevard, Downsview, Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada. (3) You may review copies at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call (202) 741–6030, or go to: https:// www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html. VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:16 Jun 24, 2008 Jkt 214001 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2008–0182; Directorate Identifier 2007–NM–262–AD; Amendment 39–15577; AD 2008–13–14] RIN 2120–AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER) Model EMB–135ER, –135KE, –135KL, and –135LR Airplanes, and Model EMB–145, –145ER, –145MR, –145LR, –145XR, –145MP, and –145EP Airplanes Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as: Fuel system reassessment, performed according to RBHA–E88/SFAR–88 (Regulamento Brasileiro de Homologacao Aeronautica 88/Special Federal Aviation Regulation No. 88), requires the inclusion of new maintenance tasks in the Critical Design Configuration Control Limitations (CDCCL) and in the Fuel System Limitations (FSL), necessary to preclude ignition sources in the fuel system. * * * We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe condition on these products. DATES: This AD becomes effective July 30, 2008. The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of July 30, 2008. ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https:// www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M–30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC. PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425) 227–1405; fax (425) 227–1149. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Discussion We issued a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products. That supplemental NPRM was published in the Federal Register on May 7, 2008 (73 FR 25609). That supplemental NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI states: Fuel system reassessment, performed according to RBHA–E88/SFAR–88, requires the inclusion of new maintenance tasks in the Critical Design Configuration Control Limitations (CDCCL) and in the Fuel System Limitations (FSL), necessary to preclude ignition sources in the fuel system. * * * The corrective action is revising the Airworthiness Limitations Section (ALS) of the Instructions for Continued Airworthiness (ICA) to incorporate new limitations for fuel tank systems. You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket. Comments We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing this AD. We considered the comments received. Request To Revise Inspections ExpressJet requests that we revise two tasks, ‘‘28–41–01–720–001–A00 and 28– 41–01–720–A00,’’ specified in Table 1 of the supplemental NPRM. The commenter states that these tasks are related to a functional check of the component rather than the aircraft system. The commenter suggests that we identify these two components by part number and require the inspections be done before the part accumulates 10,000 flight hours since new or 10,000 flight hours since the last functional check. We agree with the commenter that tasks 28–41–01–720–001–A00 and 28– 41–04–720–001–A00 are related to a functional check of the component rather than the aircraft system (the commenter referred to task 28–41–01– 720–A00, which is not listed in Table 1; we infer that the commenter intended to refer to task 28–41–04–720–001–A00). Prior to the commenter submitting its comment, the commenter raised the issue during a visit by the FAA. Since then we have discussed the issue with ˆ the manufacturer and with the Agencia Nacional de Aviacao Civil (ANAC), ¸˜ E:\FR\FM\25JNR1.SGM 25JNR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 123 (Wednesday, June 25, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 35902-35904]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-13921]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2008-0360; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-368-AD; 
Amendment 39-15570; AD 2008-13-07]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model DHC-8-400 Series 
Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the 
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing 
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of 
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an 
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:

    Several production aircraft have been found with the elevator 
overload bungees installed in reverse orientation: i.e., larger end 
outboard rather than inboard. This bungee reversal does not impact 
normal operation of the elevator, and would not increase the 
probability of an elevator disconnect. However, if a bungee became 
disconnected at the inboard side, the corresponding side of the 
elevator may not center, and this could adversely affect the pitch 
control of the aircraft.

Loss of elevator pitch control could result in reduced controllability 
of the airplane. We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct 
the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD becomes effective July 30, 2008.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by 
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of July 30, 
2008.

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of 
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, 
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fabio Buttitta, Aerospace Engineer, 
Systems and Flight Test Branch, ANE-172, FAA, New York Aircraft 
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New 
York 11590; telephone (516) 228-7303; fax (516) 794-5531.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR 
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products. 
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on March 28, 2008 (73 
FR 16577). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the 
specified products. The MCAI states:

    Several production aircraft have been found with the elevator 
overload bungees installed in reverse orientation: i.e., larger end 
outboard rather than inboard. This bungee reversal does not impact 
normal operation of the elevator, and would not increase the 
probability of an elevator disconnect. However, if a bungee became 
disconnected at the inboard side, the corresponding side of the 
elevator may not center, and this could adversely affect the pitch 
control of the aircraft.

Loss of elevator pitch control could result in reduced controllability 
of the airplane. Corrective action includes a visual inspection for 
correct installation of the elevator overload bungees, reinstallation 
if necessary, and installation of labels to the elevator overload 
bungees. You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in 
the AD docket.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing 
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of 
the cost to the public.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and 
the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in 
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it 
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the 
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these 
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information

[[Page 35903]]

provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have required different actions in this AD from those 
in the MCAI in order to follow our FAA policies. Any such differences 
are highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect 38 products of U.S. registry. 
We also estimate that it will take 1 work-hour per product to comply 
with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate is $80 
per work-hour. Required parts will cost about $36 per product. Where 
the service information lists required parts costs that are covered 
under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no charge for these 
parts. As we do not control warranty coverage for affected parties, 
some parties may incur costs higher than estimated here. Based on these 
figures, we estimate the cost of this AD to the U.S. operators to be 
$4,408, or $116 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to 
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the 
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation 
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's 
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in 
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General 
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with 
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing 
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator 
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within 
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition 
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this 
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications 
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct 
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national 
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies 
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or 
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria 
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to 
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office 
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal 
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation, 
any comments received, and other information. The street address for 
the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the 
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly 
after receipt.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, 
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2008-13-07 Bombardier, Inc. (Formerly de Havilland, Inc.): Amendment 
39-15570. Docket No. FAA-2008-0360; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-
368-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective July 30, 
2008.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Bombardier Model DHC-8-400, DHC-8-401, 
and DHC-8-402 airplanes; certificated in any category; having serial 
numbers 4003 and subsequent.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 27: Flight 
controls.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) 
states:

Several production aircraft have been found with the elevator 
overload bungees installed in reverse orientation: i.e., larger end 
outboard rather than inboard. This bungee reversal does not impact 
normal operation of the elevator, and would not increase the 
probability of an elevator disconnect. However, if a bungee became 
disconnected at the inboard side, the corresponding side of the 
elevator may not center, and this could adversely affect the pitch 
control of the aircraft.

Loss of elevator pitch control could result in reduced 
controllability of the airplane. Corrective action includes a visual 
inspection for correct installation of the elevator overload 
bungees, reinstallation if necessary, and installation of labels to 
the elevator overload bungees.

Actions and Compliance

    (f) For airplanes having serial numbers 4003, 4004, 4006, and 
4008 through 4159: unless already done, do the following actions.
    (1) Within 5,000 flight hours after the effective date of this 
AD: Visually inspect both left and right elevator overload bungees, 
part number (P/N) FE289000000, to determine if they are correctly 
installed, in accordance with Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-27-30, 
Revision `C,' dated October 31, 2007. If any bungee is found 
installed incorrectly, remove the bungee and re-install it correctly 
before the next flight in accordance with the service bulletin.
    (2) Within 5,000 flight hours after the effective date of this 
AD: Attach label, P/N FE289006200, to both left and right elevator 
overload bungees to show the correct orientation of the outboard end 
in accordance with Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-27-30, Revision 
`C,' dated October 31, 2007.
    (3) Within 5,000 flight hours after the effective date of this 
AD: Re-identify the P/N to read ``FE289000001'' on the 
identification plate of both the left and right elevator overload 
bungees in accordance with Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-27-30, 
Revision `C,' dated October 31, 2007.
    (4) Actions accomplished before the effective date of this AD in 
accordance with Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-27-27, dated May 24, 
2005, are acceptable for compliance with the corresponding actions 
specified in paragraphs (f)(1), (f)(2), and (f)(3) of this AD.
    (5) Actions accomplished before the effective date of this AD in 
accordance with Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-27-30, dated February 
8, 2007; Revision `A,' dated March 2, 2007; or Revision `B,' dated 
May 3, 2007; are acceptable for compliance with the corresponding 
actions specified in this AD.

    Note 1: Paragraphs (f)(2) and (f)(3) of this AD constitute 
Modsum 4-113537.

    (g) For all airplanes: As of the effective date of this AD, no 
replacement/spare elevator overload bungees, P/N FE289000000, are 
permitted to be installed on any airplane. Only elevator overload 
bungees identified with new P/N

[[Page 35904]]

``FE289000001'' on the identification plate are permitted to be 
installed.

FAA AD Differences

    Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information 
as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (h) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New 
York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the authority to 
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found 
in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Fabio Buttitta, Aerospace 
Engineer, Systems and Flight Test Branch, ANE-172, FAA, New York 
ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York 11590; 
telephone (516) 228-7303; fax (516) 794-5531. Before using any 
approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your 
appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards 
District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain 
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these 
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered 
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority 
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product 
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in 
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the 
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information 
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.

Related Information

    (i) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2007-30, 
dated November 28, 2007; and Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-27-30, 
Revision `C,' dated October 31, 2007; for related information.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (j) You must use Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-27-30, Revision 
`C,' dated October 31, 2007, to do the actions required by this AD, 
unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the 
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5 
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact 
Bombardier, Inc., Bombardier Regional Aircraft Division, 123 Garratt 
Boulevard, Downsview, Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada.
    (3) You may review copies at the FAA, Transport Airplane 
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the 
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information 
on the availability of this material at NARA, call (202) 741-6030, 
or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-
locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 7, 2008.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-13921 Filed 6-24-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.