Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) Program (Formerly Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) Pilot Program), 35661-35663 [E8-14193]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 122 / Tuesday, June 24, 2008 / Notices
Dated: June 17, 2008.
Emily H. Menashes
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E8–14275 Filed 6–23–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
RIN 0648–XI44
Marine Mammals and Endangered
Species; National Marine Fisheries
Service File No. 10074; U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service File No. PRT–165304
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce; U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Interior.
ACTION: Issuance of permit.
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with NOTICES
AGENCIES:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
Michael Etnier, Ph.D., Box 353100,
University of Washington, Seattle, WA
98227 has been issued a permit to
import marine mammal specimens for
purposes of scientific research.
ADDRESSES: The permit and related
documents are available for review
upon written request or by appointment
in the following office(s):
Permits, Conservation and Education
Division, Office of Protected Resources,
NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Room
13705, Silver Spring, MD 20910; phone
(301)713–2289; fax (301)427–2521;
Northwest Region, NMFS, 7600 Sand
Point Way NE, BIN C15700, Bldg. 1,
Seattle, WA 98115–0700; phone
(206)526–6150; fax (206)526–6426; and
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Division of Management Authority,
4401 North Fairfax Drive, Room 212,
Arlington, VA 22203 (1–800–358–2104).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kate
Swails or Amy Sloan, (301)713–2289.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
January 25, 2008, notice was published
in the Federal Register (73 FR 4540)
that a request for a scientific research
permit to take marine mammals had
been submitted by the above-named
individual. The requested permit has
been issued under the authority of the
Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972,
as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.), the
regulations governing the taking and
importing of marine mammals (50 CFR
part 216), the Endangered Species Act of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:39 Jun 23, 2008
Jkt 214001
1973, as amended (ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531
et seq.), the regulations governing the
taking, importing, and exporting of
endangered and threatened species (50
CFR parts 222–226), and the Fur Seal
Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1151
et seq.).
The permit authorizes Dr. Etnier to
possess and import/export marine
mammal and endangered and
threatened species parts (hard and soft)
from the orders of Cetacea, Pinnipedia,
and Carnivora (sea otter, Enhydra
lutris). Specimens (teeth, bone, and
whiskers) will be obtained from
museums and private collections or
collected from carcasses of beach
stranded animals or federally sponsored
subsistence harvests. No animals will be
taken or killed for the purposes of this
research. The objectives are to combine
osteometric, chemical, and genetic
analyses to test hypotheses regarding
the stability of ecological adaptations
among marine mammals in the eastern
north Pacific Ocean throughout the Late
Holocene.
In compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), a final
determination has been made that the
activity proposed is categorically
excluded from the requirement to
prepare an environmental assessment or
environmental impact statement.
Issuance of this permit, as required by
the ESA, was based on a finding that
such permit: (1) was applied for in good
faith; (2) will not operate to the
disadvantage of such endangered
species; and (3) is consistent with the
purposes and policies set forth in
section 2 of the ESA.
Dated: June 18, 2008.
P. Michael Payne,
Chief, Permits, Conservation and Education
Division, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
Dated: June 18, 2008.
Timothy J. Van Norman,
Chief, Branch of Permits Division of
Management Authority, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. E8–14260 Filed 6–23–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODES 3510–22–S, 4310–55–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Patent and Trademark Office
Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
Program (Formerly Patent Prosecution
Highway (PPH) Pilot Program)
ACTION:
Proposed collection; comment
request.
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
35661
SUMMARY: The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO), as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent burden, invites the
general public and other Federal
agencies to comment on the continuing
information collection, as required by
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)).
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before August 25, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• E-mail: Susan.Fawcett@uspto.gov.
Include ‘‘0651–0058 comment’’ in the
subject line of the message.
• Fax: 571–273–0112, marked to the
attention of Susan Fawcett.
• Mail: Susan K. Fawcett, Records
Officer, Office of the Chief Information
Officer, Customer Information Services
Group, Public Information Services
Division, United States Patent and
Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450,
Alexandria, VA 22313–1450.
• Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information
should be directed to Robert A. Clarke,
Director, Office of Patent Legal
Administration, United States Patent
and Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450,
Alexandria, VA 22313–1450; by
telephone at 571–272–7735; or by e-mail
at Robert.Clarke@uspto.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The Patent Prosecution Highway
(PPH) pilot program was originally
established between the United States
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
and the Japan Patent Office (JPO) on
July 3, 2006. The PPH program allows
applicants whose claims are determined
to be patentable in the office of first
filing to have the corresponding
application that is filed in the office of
second filing be advanced out of turn for
examination. At the same time, the PPH
program allows the office of second
filing to exploit the search and
examination results of the office of first
filing, which increases examination
efficiency and improves patent quality.
The USPTO and the JPO agreed at the
November 2007 Trilateral Conference to
fully implement the PPH program on a
permanent basis starting on January 4,
2008.
The USPTO entered into a PPH pilot
program with the United Kingdom
Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO) on
September 4, 2007. Additional PPH
pilot programs have also recently been
established between the USPTO and the
E:\FR\FM\24JNN1.SGM
24JNN1
35662
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 122 / Tuesday, June 24, 2008 / Notices
Canadian Intellectual Property Office
(CIPO), the Korean Intellectual Property
Office (KIPO), and the Intellectual
Property Office of Australia (IPAU).
In addition to the PPH program, the
USPTO and the JPO also participate in
a work-sharing pilot project called the
‘‘New Route.’’ Under the New Route
framework, a filing in one member
office of this arrangement would be
deemed a filing in all member offices.
The first office and applicant would be
given a 30-month processing time frame
in which to make available a first office
action and any necessary translations to
the second office(s), and the second
office(s) would exploit the search and
examination results in conducting their
own examination. The New Route
proposal permits the search and
examination results of the first office to
be transmitted to the second office(s)
according to an internationally
coordinated time frame. By allowing the
second office to exploit the search and
examination results of the first office,
the primary benefits of the New Route
program would be to reduce overall
office workload, minimize duplication
of search efforts, and increase
examination quality. Because the New
Route, as envisioned, would require
changes in law in the USPTO and the
JPO, the USPTO and the JPO agreed to
commence a pilot project to test the
New Route concept based on filing
scenarios currently available under
existing law in both offices. The New
Route pilot project began on January 28,
2008, and will end when the number of
requests reaches 50 or at the expiration
of one year, whichever occurs first.
This information collection
previously included two forms, Request
for Participation in the New Route Pilot
Program Between the JPO and the
USPTO (PTO/SB/10) and Request for
Participation in the Patent Prosecution
Highway (PPH) Pilot Program Between
the (1) JPO or (2) UKIPO and the USPTO
(PTO/SB/20), which may be used by
applicants to request participation in
the programs and to ensure that they
meet the program requirements. Since
the PPH program with the JPO has been
fully implemented, Form PTO/SB/20
has been revised as Form PTO/SB/20JP
for use with the JPO and a separate
Form PTO/SB/20UK has been created
for the ongoing pilot program with the
UKIPO. Similar forms have been created
for the PPH pilot programs with the
CIPO, the KIPO, and the IPAU. These
additional PPH pilot program forms are
being added to this collection.
II. Method of Collection
Requests to participate in the New
Route pilot program must be submitted
by fax to the Office of the Commissioner
for Patents (571–273–0125) to ensure
that the request is processed in a timely
manner. Requests to participate in the
PPH programs must be submitted online
using EFS-Web, the USPTO’s web-based
electronic filing system.
III. Data
OMB Number: 0651–0058.
Form Number(s): PTO/SB/10, PTO/
SB/20AU, PTO/SB/20CA, PTO/SB/20JP,
PTO/SB/20KR, PTO/SB/20UK.
Type of Review: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households; businesses or other forprofits; and not-for-profit institutions.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
1,250 responses per year.
Estimated Time per Response: The
USPTO estimates that it will take the
public approximately 1.5 to 2 hours to
gather the necessary information,
prepare the form, and submit a
completed request to participate in the
New Route or PPH program.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent
Burden Hours: 2,475 hours per year.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent
Cost Burden: $767,250 per year. The
USPTO expects that the information in
this collection will be prepared by
attorneys. Using the professional rate of
$310 per hour for associate attorneys in
private firms, the USPTO estimates that
the total annual respondent cost burden
for this collection will be approximately
$767,250 per year.
Estimated time
for response
Item
Request for Participation in the New Route Pilot Program Between the JPO and the
USPTO (PTO/SB/10) .............................................................................................................
Request for Participation in the Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) Program Between the
JPO and the USPTO (PTO/SB/20JP) ...................................................................................
Request for Participation in the Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) Pilot Program Between
the UKIPO and the USPTO (PTO/SB/20UK) ........................................................................
Request for Participation in the Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) Pilot Program Between
the CIPO and the USPTO (PTO/SB/20CA) ...........................................................................
Request for Participation in the Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) Pilot Program Between
the KIPO and the USPTO (PTO/SB/20KR) ...........................................................................
Request for Participation in the Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) Pilot Program Between
the IPAU and the USPTO (PTO/SB/20AU) ...........................................................................
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with NOTICES
Totals ..................................................................................................................................
Estimated Total Annual Non-hour
Respondent Cost Burden: $162,590 per
year. There are no capital start-up,
maintenance, or postage costs associated
with this collection. However, this
collection does have annual (non-hour)
costs in the form of filing fees and
recordkeeping costs.
The filing fee for requests to
participate in the New Route or PPH
programs is $130 under 37 CFR 1.17(h).
Using the $130 fee, the USPTO
estimates that the total filing fees for
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:39 Jun 23, 2008
Jkt 214001
this collection would be $162,500 per
year.
There are also recordkeeping costs
associated with submitting the PPH
forms in this collection online through
EFS-Web. When submitting forms
through EFS-Web, the USPTO
recommends that customers print and
retain a copy of the acknowledgment
receipt as evidence of the successful
submission. The USPTO estimates that
it will take 5 seconds (0.001 hours) to
print a copy of the acknowledgment
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1.5
Estimated
annual
responses
Estimated
annual burden
hours
50
75
2
500
1,000
2
250
500
2
100
200
2
250
500
2
100
200
1,250
2,475
..........................
receipt and that approximately 1,200
submissions in this collection will be
filed online, for a total of approximately
1 hour per year. The USPTO expects
that these receipts will be printed by
paraprofessionals at an estimated rate of
$90 per hour, for a total recordkeeping
cost of $90 per year.
The total (non-hour) respondent cost
burden for this collection in the form of
filing fees and recordkeeping costs is
estimated to be $162,590 per year.
E:\FR\FM\24JNN1.SGM
24JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 122 / Tuesday, June 24, 2008 / Notices
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, e.g., the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Dated: June 17, 2008.
Susan K. Fawcett,
Records Officer, USPTO, Office of the Chief
Information Officer, Customer Information
Services Group, Public Information Services
Division.
[FR Doc. E8–14193 Filed 6–23–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Patent and Trademark Office
Representative and Address
Provisions
ACTION:
Proposed collection; comment
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with NOTICES
request.
SUMMARY: The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO), as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent burden, invites the
general public and other Federal
agencies to take this opportunity to
comment on the continuing information
collection, as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–
13 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)).
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before August 25, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• E-mail: Susan.Fawcett@uspto.gov.
Include ‘‘0651–0035 comment’’ in the
subject line of the message.
• Fax: 571–273–0112, marked to the
attention of Susan Fawcett.
• Mail: Susan K. Fawcett, Records
Officer, Office of the Chief Information
Officer, Customer Information Services
Group, Public Information Services
Division, United States Patent and
Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450,
Alexandria, VA 22313–1450.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:39 Jun 23, 2008
Jkt 214001
• Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information
should be directed to Robert A. Clarke,
Director, Office of Patent Legal
Administration, United States Patent
and Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450,
Alexandria, VA 22313–1450; by
telephone at 571–272–7735; or by e-mail
to Robert.Clarke@uspto.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
Under 35 U.S.C. 2 and 37 CFR 1.31–
1.36, a patent applicant or assignee of
record may grant power of attorney to a
person who is registered to practice
before the United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO) to act for
them in a patent or application. A
power of attorney may also be revoked,
and a registered practitioner may also
withdraw as attorney or agent of record
under 37 CFR 1.36. The rules of practice
(37 CFR 1.33) also provide for the
applicant, assignee, or practitioner of
record to supply a correspondence
address and daytime telephone number
for receiving notices, official letters, and
other communications from the USPTO.
Maintaining a correct and updated
correspondence address is necessary so
that official correspondence from the
USPTO related to a patent or
application will be properly received by
the applicant, assignee, or practitioner.
The USPTO’s Customer Number
practice permits applicants, assignees,
and practitioners of record to change the
correspondence address or
representatives of record for a number of
patents or applications with one change
request instead of filing separate
requests for each patent or application.
Customers may request a Customer
Number from the USPTO and associate
this Customer Number with a
correspondence address or a list of
registered practitioners. Any changes to
the address or practitioner information
associated with a Customer Number will
be applied to all patents and
applications associated with that
Customer Number.
The Customer Number practice is
optional, in that changes of
correspondence address or power of
attorney may be filed separately for each
patent or application without using a
Customer Number. However, a
Customer Number associated with the
correspondence address for a patent
application is required in order to
access private information about the
application using the Patent Application
Information Retrieval (PAIR) system,
which is available through the USPTO
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
35663
Web site. The PAIR system allows
authorized individuals secure online
access to application status information,
but only for patent applications that are
linked to a Customer Number. Customer
Numbers may be associated with U.S.
patent applications as well as
international Patent Cooperation Treaty
(PCT) applications. The use of a
Customer Number is also required in
order to grant power of attorney to more
than ten practitioners or to establish a
separate ‘‘fee address’’ for maintenance
fee purposes that is different from the
correspondence address for a patent or
application.
In addition to the forms offered by the
USPTO to assist customers with
providing the information in this
collection, customers may also format
requests using a Customer Number
Upload Spreadsheet to designate or
change the correspondence address or
fee address for a list of patents or
applications by associating them with a
Customer Number. The Customer
Number Upload Spreadsheet must be
submitted to the USPTO on a computerreadable diskette or compact disc (CD),
accompanied by a signed cover letter
requesting entry of the address changes
for the listed patents and applications.
The spreadsheet and cover letter must
be mailed to the USPTO and cannot be
filed electronically. Customers may
download a Microsoft Excel template
with instructions from the USPTO Web
site to assist them in preparing the
spreadsheet in the proper format. The
Customer Number Upload Spreadsheet
may not be used to change the power of
attorney for patents or applications.
This information collection includes
the information necessary to submit a
request to grant or revoke power of
attorney for a patent application and for
a registered practitioner to withdraw as
attorney or agent of record for a patent
application. This collection also
includes the information necessary to
request a Customer Number and
associate a correspondence address or
list of practitioners with this Customer
Number, to change the correspondence
address or practitioners associated with
a Customer Number, and to designate or
change the correspondence address or
fee address for one or more patents or
applications by using a Customer
Number.
The USPTO is revising a form in this
collection, Request for Withdrawal as
Attorney or Agent and Change of
Correspondence Address (PTO/SB/83),
to allow the practitioner requesting
withdrawal to certify that proper notice
has been given to the client and that all
papers and property to which the client
is entitled have been delivered. The
E:\FR\FM\24JNN1.SGM
24JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 122 (Tuesday, June 24, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35661-35663]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-14193]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Patent and Trademark Office
Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) Program (Formerly Patent
Prosecution Highway (PPH) Pilot Program)
ACTION: Proposed collection; comment request.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), as part
of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden,
invites the general public and other Federal agencies to comment on the
continuing information collection, as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)).
DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before August 25, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
E-mail: Susan.Fawcett@uspto.gov. Include ``0651-0058
comment'' in the subject line of the message.
Fax: 571-273-0112, marked to the attention of Susan
Fawcett.
Mail: Susan K. Fawcett, Records Officer, Office of the
Chief Information Officer, Customer Information Services Group, Public
Information Services Division, United States Patent and Trademark
Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450.
Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information
should be directed to Robert A. Clarke, Director, Office of Patent
Legal Administration, United States Patent and Trademark Office, P.O.
Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450; by telephone at 571-272-7735; or
by e-mail at Robert.Clarke@uspto.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) pilot program was originally
established between the United States Patent and Trademark Office
(USPTO) and the Japan Patent Office (JPO) on July 3, 2006. The PPH
program allows applicants whose claims are determined to be patentable
in the office of first filing to have the corresponding application
that is filed in the office of second filing be advanced out of turn
for examination. At the same time, the PPH program allows the office of
second filing to exploit the search and examination results of the
office of first filing, which increases examination efficiency and
improves patent quality. The USPTO and the JPO agreed at the November
2007 Trilateral Conference to fully implement the PPH program on a
permanent basis starting on January 4, 2008.
The USPTO entered into a PPH pilot program with the United Kingdom
Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO) on September 4, 2007. Additional
PPH pilot programs have also recently been established between the
USPTO and the
[[Page 35662]]
Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO), the Korean Intellectual
Property Office (KIPO), and the Intellectual Property Office of
Australia (IPAU).
In addition to the PPH program, the USPTO and the JPO also
participate in a work-sharing pilot project called the ``New Route.''
Under the New Route framework, a filing in one member office of this
arrangement would be deemed a filing in all member offices. The first
office and applicant would be given a 30-month processing time frame in
which to make available a first office action and any necessary
translations to the second office(s), and the second office(s) would
exploit the search and examination results in conducting their own
examination. The New Route proposal permits the search and examination
results of the first office to be transmitted to the second office(s)
according to an internationally coordinated time frame. By allowing the
second office to exploit the search and examination results of the
first office, the primary benefits of the New Route program would be to
reduce overall office workload, minimize duplication of search efforts,
and increase examination quality. Because the New Route, as envisioned,
would require changes in law in the USPTO and the JPO, the USPTO and
the JPO agreed to commence a pilot project to test the New Route
concept based on filing scenarios currently available under existing
law in both offices. The New Route pilot project began on January 28,
2008, and will end when the number of requests reaches 50 or at the
expiration of one year, whichever occurs first.
This information collection previously included two forms, Request
for Participation in the New Route Pilot Program Between the JPO and
the USPTO (PTO/SB/10) and Request for Participation in the Patent
Prosecution Highway (PPH) Pilot Program Between the (1) JPO or (2)
UKIPO and the USPTO (PTO/SB/20), which may be used by applicants to
request participation in the programs and to ensure that they meet the
program requirements. Since the PPH program with the JPO has been fully
implemented, Form PTO/SB/20 has been revised as Form PTO/SB/20JP for
use with the JPO and a separate Form PTO/SB/20UK has been created for
the ongoing pilot program with the UKIPO. Similar forms have been
created for the PPH pilot programs with the CIPO, the KIPO, and the
IPAU. These additional PPH pilot program forms are being added to this
collection.
II. Method of Collection
Requests to participate in the New Route pilot program must be
submitted by fax to the Office of the Commissioner for Patents (571-
273-0125) to ensure that the request is processed in a timely manner.
Requests to participate in the PPH programs must be submitted online
using EFS-Web, the USPTO's web-based electronic filing system.
III. Data
OMB Number: 0651-0058.
Form Number(s): PTO/SB/10, PTO/SB/20AU, PTO/SB/20CA, PTO/SB/20JP,
PTO/SB/20KR, PTO/SB/20UK.
Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection.
Affected Public: Individuals or households; businesses or other
for-profits; and not-for-profit institutions.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 1,250 responses per year.
Estimated Time per Response: The USPTO estimates that it will take
the public approximately 1.5 to 2 hours to gather the necessary
information, prepare the form, and submit a completed request to
participate in the New Route or PPH program.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent Burden Hours: 2,475 hours per
year.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent Cost Burden: $767,250 per year.
The USPTO expects that the information in this collection will be
prepared by attorneys. Using the professional rate of $310 per hour for
associate attorneys in private firms, the USPTO estimates that the
total annual respondent cost burden for this collection will be
approximately $767,250 per year.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Estimated
Item Estimated time annual annual burden
for response responses hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Request for Participation in the New Route Pilot Program 1.5 50 75
Between the JPO and the USPTO (PTO/SB/10).....................
Request for Participation in the Patent Prosecution Highway 2 500 1,000
(PPH) Program Between the JPO and the USPTO (PTO/SB/20JP).....
Request for Participation in the Patent Prosecution Highway 2 250 500
(PPH) Pilot Program Between the UKIPO and the USPTO (PTO/SB/
20UK).........................................................
Request for Participation in the Patent Prosecution Highway 2 100 200
(PPH) Pilot Program Between the CIPO and the USPTO (PTO/SB/
20CA).........................................................
Request for Participation in the Patent Prosecution Highway 2 250 500
(PPH) Pilot Program Between the KIPO and the USPTO (PTO/SB/
20KR).........................................................
Request for Participation in the Patent Prosecution Highway 2 100 200
(PPH) Pilot Program Between the IPAU and the USPTO (PTO/SB/
20AU).........................................................
------------------------------------------------
Totals..................................................... ............... 1,250 2,475
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Total Annual Non-hour Respondent Cost Burden: $162,590
per year. There are no capital start-up, maintenance, or postage costs
associated with this collection. However, this collection does have
annual (non-hour) costs in the form of filing fees and recordkeeping
costs.
The filing fee for requests to participate in the New Route or PPH
programs is $130 under 37 CFR 1.17(h). Using the $130 fee, the USPTO
estimates that the total filing fees for this collection would be
$162,500 per year.
There are also recordkeeping costs associated with submitting the
PPH forms in this collection online through EFS-Web. When submitting
forms through EFS-Web, the USPTO recommends that customers print and
retain a copy of the acknowledgment receipt as evidence of the
successful submission. The USPTO estimates that it will take 5 seconds
(0.001 hours) to print a copy of the acknowledgment receipt and that
approximately 1,200 submissions in this collection will be filed
online, for a total of approximately 1 hour per year. The USPTO expects
that these receipts will be printed by paraprofessionals at an
estimated rate of $90 per hour, for a total recordkeeping cost of $90
per year.
The total (non-hour) respondent cost burden for this collection in
the form of filing fees and recordkeeping costs is estimated to be
$162,590 per year.
[[Page 35663]]
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on respondents, e.g., the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized or
included in the request for OMB approval of this information
collection; they also will become a matter of public record.
Dated: June 17, 2008.
Susan K. Fawcett,
Records Officer, USPTO, Office of the Chief Information Officer,
Customer Information Services Group, Public Information Services
Division.
[FR Doc. E8-14193 Filed 6-23-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-16-P