Testimony by OPM Employees and Production of Official Records in Legal Proceedings, 35354-35358 [E8-14059]
Download as PDF
35354
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 73, No. 121
Monday, June 23, 2008
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT
5 CFR PART 295
RIN 3206–AL22
Testimony by OPM Employees and
Production of Official Records in Legal
Proceedings
U.S. Office of Personnel
Management (OPM).
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Office of Personnel
Management seeks public comment on
a proposed rule that would set forth
procedures that requesters would have
to follow when making demands or
requests to an OPM employee to
produce official records or provide
testimony relating to official
information, in connection with a legal
proceeding in which OPM is not a party.
As proposed, this rule would establish
procedures to respond to such demands
and requests in an orderly and
consistent manner. The proposed rule,
among other benefits, will promote
uniformity in decisions, protect
confidential information, provide
guidance to requesters, and reduce the
potential for both inappropriate
disclosures of official information and
wasteful allocation of agency resources.
Comments must be received on
or before August 22, 2008.
DATES:
Send comments to R. Alan
Miller, Associate General Counsel, U.S.
Office of Personnel Management, Room
7353, 1900 E Street, NW., Washington,
DC 20415 or by electronic mail at
Richard.Miller@opm.gov. For e-mail
messages, the subject line should
include the following reference:
Proposed Rule on Testimony by OPM
Employees and Production of Official
Records in Legal Proceedings.
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
R.
Alan Miller, 202–606–1700.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:51 Jun 20, 2008
Jkt 214001
Background
The U.S. Office of Personnel
Management (OPM) occasionally
receives subpoenas and requests for
OPM employees to provide evidence in
litigation in which OPM is not a party.
Often these subpoenas and requests are
for OPM records that are not available
to the public under the Freedom of
Information Act. Also, OPM sometimes
receives subpoenas and requests for
OPM employees to appear as witnesses
in litigation in conjunction with a
request for nonpublic records.
Requesters have sought information, for
example, on retirement records, pay
issues, and other program matters,
under OPM jurisdiction. Responding to
such demands and requests can result in
a significant disruption to OPM
employees’ work schedules. The result
is that employees may be diverted from
performing their official duties in order
to respond to requests from parties in
litigation. In order to address this
problem, many agencies over the years
have issued regulations that are similar
to this proposed regulation, governing
the circumstances and manner in which
an employee may respond to demands
for testimony or for the production of
documents. Such a regulation was
sustained by the United States Supreme
Court in United States ex rel. Touhy v.
Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 (1951).
In Touhy, the Supreme Court held
that a U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ)
official, acting on order of the Attorney
General, could not be held in contempt
for declining to produce records in
response to a subpoena. The employee’s
refusal was based upon a DOJ regulation
that prohibited disclosure of agency
files, documents, records, or
information without the express
approval of the Attorney General. The
Court sustained the validity of the DOJ
regulations, reasoning that it was
appropriate for the Attorney General to
prescribe regulations not inconsistent
with law for the custody, use and
preservation of records, papers, and
property pertaining to the Department of
Justice.
Briefly summarized, the proposed
rule would prohibit disclosure of
nonpublic official records or testimony
by OPM employees unless there is
compliance with the OPM rule. The
proposed rule identifies the factors that
OPM will consider in making
determinations in response to such
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
requests and what information
requesters must provide. The proposed
rule also addresses when the request
should be submitted, the time period for
review, potential fees, and any
restrictions that may be placed on the
disclosure of records or the appearance
of an OPM employee as a witness if a
request is granted. The proposed
charges for witnesses are the same as
those provided by the Federal courts
and the fees related to production of
records are the same as those charged
under FOIA. The proposed charges for
time spent by an employee to prepare
for testimony and for certification of
records by OPM are authorized under 31
U.S.C. 9701, which permits an agency to
charge for services or things of value
that are provided by the agency.
The proposed rule applies to a broad
range of matters in legal proceedings in
which OPM is not a named party. It also
applies to former and current OPM
employees as well as OPM consultants
and advisers. Former employees are
prohibited from testifying about specific
matters for which they had
responsibility during their active
employment unless permitted to testify
as provided in the proposed rule. They
would not be barred from appearing to
testify about general matters
unconnected with the specific matters
for which they had responsibility.
The proposed regulation will ensure a
more efficient use of OPM resources,
minimize the possibility of involving
OPM in issues unrelated to its
responsibilities, promote uniformity in
responding to such requests and
subpoenas, prevent improper attempts
to obtain testimony from OPM
personnel as to issues of law, prevent
improper attempts to use OPM
personnel as expert witnesses against
other Federal agencies, and maintain the
impartiality of OPM in matters among
private litigants. It also would serve
OPM’s interest in protecting sensitive,
confidential, and privilege information
and records that are generated in
response to the requirements in the
personnel laws and regulations.
The proposed OPM rule is internal,
and is essentially procedural, not
substantive. It would neither create a
right to obtain official records or the
testimony of an OPM employee nor
create any additional right or privilege
not already available to OPM to deny
any demand or request therefor.
E:\FR\FM\23JNP1.SGM
23JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 121 / Monday, June 23, 2008 / Proposed Rules
However, failure to comply with the
procedures in the proposed rule would
be a basis for denying a demand or
request submitted to OPM.
Administrative Procedure Act
This proposed rulemaking is in
compliance with the Administrative
Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553) and allows
for a 60-day comment period. Interested
persons are invited to submit written
comments to OPM on this proposed
regulation, to be received on or before
August 22, 2008. OPM will review all
comments received and consider any
modifications to this proposal which
appear warranted.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
For purposes of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6), the
proposed rule, if adopted, will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The proposed rule addresses only the
procedures to be followed in the
production or disclosure of OPM
materials and information in litigation
where OPM is not a party. Accordingly,
OPM has determined that a Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis is not required.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
For purposes of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C.
chapter 25, subchapter II), the proposed
rule would not significantly or uniquely
affect small governments and would not
result in increased expenditures by
State, local, and tribal governments, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100 million or more (as adjusted for
inflation).
Executive Order 12866
In issuing this proposed regulation,
OPM has adhered to the regulatory
philosophy and the applicable
principles of regulation as set forth in
section 1 of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review. This
proposed rule has not been reviewed by
the Office of Management and Budget
under that Executive Order since it is
not a significant regulatory action
within the meaning of the Executive
Order.
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS
Executive Order 12988
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. chapter 35) does not apply
14:51 Jun 20, 2008
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 295
Administrative practice and
procedures, Conflict of Interests, Courts,
Government employees, Records,
Subpoenas, Testimony.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Linda M. Springer,
Director.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth
in the preamble, the U.S. Office of
Personnel Management proposes to add
a new part 295 to 5 CFR to read as
follows:
PART 295—TESTIMONY BY OPM
EMPLOYEES AND PRODUCTION OF
OFFICIAL RECORDS IN LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
Subpart A—General Provisions
Sec.
295.101 Scope and purpose.
295.102 Applicability.
295.103 Definitions.
Subpart B—Requests for Testimony and
Production of Documents
295.201 General prohibition
295.202 Factors OPM will consider.
295.203 Filing requirements for demands or
requests for documents or testimony.
295.204 Service of subpoenas or requests.
295.205 Processing demands or requests.
295.206 Final determination.
295.207 Restrictions that apply to testimony
295.208 Restrictions that apply to released
records.
295.209 Procedure when a decision is not
made prior to the time a response is
required.
295.210 Procedure in the event of an
adverse ruling.
Subpart C—Schedule of Fees
295.301 Fees.
Subpart D—Penalties
295.401 Penalties.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. App. (Sec. 1103, Civil
Service Reform Act of 1978).
Jkt 214001
§ 295.101
Scope and purpose.
(a) This part sets forth policies and
procedures you must follow when you
submit a demand or request to an
employee of the U.S. Office of Personnel
Management (OPM) to produce official
records and information, or provide
testimony relating to official
information, in connection with a legal
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
proceeding. You must comply with
these requirements when you request
the release or disclosure of official
records and information.
(b) OPM intends these provisions to:
(1) Promote economy and efficiency
in its programs and operations;
(2) Minimize the possibility of
involving OPM in controversial issues
not related to our functions;
(3) Prevent the misuse of OPM
employees as involuntary expert
witnesses for private interests or as
inappropriate expert witnesses as to the
state of the law;
(4) Maintain OPM’s impartiality
among private litigants where neither
OPM nor any other Federal entity is a
named party; and
(5) Protect sensitive, confidential
information and the deliberative
processes of OPM.
(c) In providing for these
requirements, OPM does not waive the
sovereign immunity of the United
States.
(d) This part provides guidance for
the internal operations of OPM. It does
not create any right or benefits,
substantive or procedural, that a party
may rely upon in any legal proceeding
against the United States.
§ 295.102
Subpart A—General Provisions
As Director of OPM, I have reviewed
this proposed regulation in light of
section 3 of Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform, and certify that it
meets the applicable standards provided
therein.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
because this proposed regulation does
not contain information collection
requirements that require approval by
the Office of Management and Budget.
OPM expects the collection of
information that is called for by the
proposed regulation would involve
fewer than ten persons each year.
35355
Applicability.
This part applies to demands and
requests to employees of OPM in legal
proceedings in which OPM is not a
named party, for factual or expert
testimony relating to official
information or for production of official
records or information. However, it does
not apply to:
(a) Demands upon or requests for a
current OPM employee to testify as to
facts or events that are unrelated to his
or her official duties or that are
unrelated to the functions of OPM;
(b) Demands upon or requests for a
former OPM employee to testify as to
matters in which the former employee
was not directly or materially involved
while at OPM;
(c) Requests for the release of records
under the Freedom of Information Act,
5 U.S.C. 552, or the Privacy Act, 5
U.S.C. 552(a); and
(d) Congressional or Government
Accountability Office (GAO) demands
and requests for testimony or records.
§ 295.103
Definitions.
Demand means a subpoena, or an
order or other command of a court or
other competent authority, for the
production, disclosure, or release of
records or for the appearance and
testimony of an OPM employee that is
issued in a legal proceeding.
General Counsel means the General
Counsel of OPM or a person to whom
E:\FR\FM\23JNP1.SGM
23JNP1
35356
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 121 / Monday, June 23, 2008 / Proposed Rules
the General Counsel has delegated
authority under this part.
Legal proceeding means any matter
before a court of law, administrative
board or tribunal, commission,
administrative law judge, hearing
officer, or other body that conducts a
legal or administrative proceeding.
Legal proceeding includes all phases of
litigation.
OPM means the U.S. Office of
Personnel Management.
OPM employee or employee means:
(1) Any current or former officer or
employee of OPM;
(2) Any other individual hired
through contractual agreement by or on
behalf of the OPM or who has
performed or is performing services
under such an agreement for OPM; and
(3) Any individual who served or is
serving in any consulting or advisory
capacity to OPM, whether formal or
informal.
(4) Provided, that this definition does
not include persons who are no longer
employed by OPM and who are retained
or hired as expert witnesses or who
agree to testify about general matters
available to the public, or matters with
which they had no specific involvement
or responsibility during their
employment with OPM.
Records or official records and
information mean:
(1) All documents and materials
which are OPM agency records under
the Freedom of Information Act, 5
U.S.C. 552;
(2) All other documents and materials
contained in OPM files; and
(3) All other information or materials
acquired by an OPM employee in the
performance of his or her official duties
or because of his or her official status.
Request means any informal requests,
by whatever method, for the production
of records and information or for
testimony which has not been ordered
by a court or other competent authority.
Testimony means any written or oral
statements, including depositions,
answers to interrogatories, affidavits,
declarations, recorded interviews, and
statements made by an individual in
connection with a legal proceeding.
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS
Subpart B—Requests for Testimony
and Production of Documents
§ 295.201
General prohibition.
No employee may produce official
records and information or provide any
testimony relating to official
information in response to a demand or
request without the prior, written
approval of the General Counsel.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:51 Jun 20, 2008
Jkt 214001
§ 295.202
Factors OPM will consider.
The General Counsel, in his or her
sole discretion, may grant an employee
permission to testify on matters relating
to official information, or produce
official records and information, in
response to an appropriate demand or
request. Among the relevant factors that
the General Counsel may consider in
making this decision are whether:
(a) The purposes of this part are met;
(b) Allowing such testimony or
production of records would be
necessary to prevent a miscarriage of
justice;
(c) OPM has an interest in the
decision that may be rendered in the
legal proceeding;
(d) Allowing such testimony or
production of records would assist or
hinder OPM in performing its statutory
duties or use OPM resources in a way
that will interfere with the ability of
OPM employees to do their regular
work;
(e) Allowing such testimony or
production of records would be in the
best interest of OPM or the United
States;
(f) The records or testimony can be
obtained from other sources;
(g) The demand or request is unduly
burdensome or otherwise inappropriate
under the applicable rules of discovery
or the rules of procedure governing the
case or matter in which the demand or
request arose;
(h) Disclosure would violate a statute,
Executive order or regulation;
(i) Disclosure would reveal
confidential, sensitive, or privileged
information, trade secrets or similar,
confidential commercial or financial
information, or would otherwise be
inappropriate for release;
(j) Disclosure would impede or
interfere with an ongoing law
enforcement investigation or
proceedings, or compromise
constitutional rights;
(k) Disclosure would result in OPM
appearing to favor one private litigant
over another private litigant;
(l) Disclosure relates to documents
that were produced by another agency;
(m) A substantial Government interest
is implicated;
(n) The demand or request is within
the authority of the party making it;
(o) The demand improperly seeks to
compel an OPM employee to serve as an
expert witness for a private interest;
(p) The demand improperly seeks to
compel an OPM employee to testify as
to a matter of law;
(q) The demand or request is
sufficiently specific to be answered.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
§ 295.203 Filing requirements for demands
or requests for documents or testimony.
You must comply with the following
requirements whenever you issue
demands or requests to an OPM
employee for official records and
information or testimony.
(a) Your request must be in writing
and must be submitted to the General
Counsel. If you serve a subpoena on
OPM or an OPM employee before
submitting a written request and
receiving a final determination, OPM
will oppose the subpoena on grounds
that your request was not submitted in
accordance with this subpart.
(b) Your written request must contain
the following information:
(1) The caption of the legal
proceeding, docket number, and name
and address of the court or other
authority involved.
(2) A copy of the complaint or
equivalent document setting forth the
assertions in the case and any other
pleading or document necessary to
show relevance;
(3) A list of categories of records
sought, a detailed description of how
the information sought is relevant to the
issues in the legal proceeding, and a
specific description of the substance of
the testimony or records sought;
(4) A statement as to how the need for
the information outweighs the need to
maintain any confidentiality of the
information and outweighs the burden
on OPM to produce the records or
provide testimony;
(5) A statement indicating that the
information sought is not available from
another source, from other persons or
entities, or from the testimony of
someone other than an OPM employee,
such as a retained expert;
(6) If testimony is requested, the
intended use of the testimony, a general
summary of the desired testimony, and
a showing that no document could be
provided and used in lieu of testimony;
(7) A description of all prior
decisions, orders, or pending motions in
the case that bear upon the relevance of
the requested records or testimony;
(8) The name, address, and telephone
number of counsel to each party in the
case; and
(9) An estimate of the amount of time
that the requester and other parties will
require with each OPM employee for
time spent by the employee to prepare
for testimony, in travel, and for
attendance in the legal proceeding.
(c) The Office of Personnel
Management reserves the right to
require additional information to
complete your request where
appropriate.
E:\FR\FM\23JNP1.SGM
23JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 121 / Monday, June 23, 2008 / Proposed Rules
(d) Your request should be submitted
at least 45 days before the date that
records or testimony is required.
Requests submitted in less than 45 days
before records or testimony is required
must be accompanied by a written
explanation stating the reasons for the
late request and the reasons for
expedited processing.
(e) Failure to cooperate in good faith
to enable the General Counsel to make
an informed decision may serve as the
basis for a determination not to comply
with your request.
§ 295.204
request.
Service of subpoenas or
Subpoenas or requests for official
records or information or testimony
must be served on the General Counsel,
U.S. Office of Personnel Management,
1900 E Street, NW., Washington, DC
20415.
§ 295.205 Processing demands or
requests.
(a) After service of a demand or
request to testify, the General Counsel
will review the demand or request and,
in accordance with the provisions of
this subpart, determine whether, or
under what conditions, to authorize the
employee to testify on matters relating
to official information and/or produce
official records and information.
(b) OPM will process requests in the
order in which they are received.
Absent exigent or unusual
circumstances, OPM will respond
within 45 days from the date that we
receive it. The time for response will
depend upon the scope of the request.
(c) The General Counsel may grant a
waiver of any procedure described by
this subpart where a waiver is
considered necessary to promote a
significant interest of OPM or the
United States or for other good cause.
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS
§ 295.206
Final determination.
The General Counsel makes the final
determination on demands and requests
to employees for production of official
records and information or testimony.
All final determinations are within the
sole discretion of the General Counsel.
The General Counsel will notify the
requester and the court or other
authority of the final determination, the
reasons for the grant or denial of the
demand or request, and any conditions
that the General Counsel may impose on
the release of records or information, or
on the testimony of an OPM employee.
for example, limiting the areas of
testimony or requiring the requester and
other parties to the legal proceeding to
agree that the transcript of the testimony
will be kept under seal or will only be
used or made available in the particular
legal proceeding for which testimony
was requested. The General Counsel
may also require a copy of the transcript
of testimony at the requester’s expense.
(b) OPM may offer the employee’s
written declaration in lieu of testimony.
(c) If authorized to testify pursuant to
this part, an employee may testify as to
facts within his or her personal
knowledge, but, unless specifically
authorized to do so by the General
Counsel, the employee shall not:
(1) Disclose confidential or privileged
information;
(2) Testify as to facts when the
General Counsel determines such
testimony would not be in the best
interest of OPM or the United States; or
(3) For a current OPM employee,
testify as an expert or opinion witness
with regard to any matter arising out of
the employee’s official duties or the
functions of OPM unless testimony is
being given on behalf of the United
States.
§ 295.208 Restrictions that apply to
released records.
(a) The General Counsel may impose
conditions or restrictions on the release
of official records and information,
including the requirement that parties to
the proceeding obtain a protective order
or execute a confidentiality agreement
to limit access and any further
disclosure. The terms of the protective
order or of a confidentiality agreement
must be acceptable to the General
Counsel. In cases where protective
orders or confidentiality agreements
have already been executed, OPM may
condition the release of official records
and information on an amendment to
the existing protective order or
confidentiality agreement.
(b) If the General Counsel so
determines, original OPM records may
be presented for examination in
response to a demand or request, but
they are not to be presented as evidence
or otherwise used in a manner by which
they could lose their identity as official
OPM records, and they are not to be
marked or altered. In lieu of the original
records, certified copies will be
presented for evidentiary purposes (see
28 U.S.C. 1733).
§ 295.207 Restrictions that apply to
testimony.
(a) The General Counsel may impose
conditions or restrictions on the
testimony of OPM employees including,
§ 295.209 Procedure when a decision is
not made prior to the time a response is
required.
If a response to a demand or request
is required before the General Counsel
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:51 Jun 20, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
35357
can make the determination referred to
in Sec. 295.206, the General Counsel
will provide the court or other
competent authority with a copy of this
part, inform the court or other
competent authority that the demand or
request is being reviewed, and seek a
stay of the demand or request pending
a final determination.
§ 295.210 Procedure in the event of an
adverse ruling.
If the court or other competent
authority fails to stay the demand, the
employee upon whom the demand is
made will appear at the stated time and
place, produce a copy of this part, state
that the employee has been advised by
counsel not to provide the requested
testimony or produce documents, and
respectfully decline to comply with the
demand, citing United States ex rel.
Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 (1951). A
written response may be offered to a
request, or to a demand, if permitted by
the court or other competent authority.
Subpart C—Schedule of Fees
§ 295.301
Fees.
(a) Generally. The General Counsel
may condition the production of records
or appearance for testimony upon
advance payment of a reasonable
estimate of the costs to OPM.
(b) Fees for records. Fees for
producing records will include fees for
searching, reviewing, and duplicating
records, costs of attorney time spent in
reviewing the demand or request, and
expenses generated by materials and
equipment used to search for, produce,
and copy the responsive information.
Costs for employee time will be
calculated on the basis of the hourly pay
of the employee (including all pay,
allowance, and benefits). Fees for
duplication will be the same as those
charged by OPM in its Freedom of
Information Act regulations at 5 CFR
part 294.
(c) Witness fees. Fees for attendance
by a witness will include fees, expenses,
and allowances prescribed by the
court’s rules. If no such fees are
prescribed, witness fees will be
determined based upon the rule of the
Federal district court closest to the
location where the witness will appear.
Such fees will include cost of time spent
by the witness to prepare for testimony,
in travel, and for attendance in the legal
proceeding.
(d) Payment of fees. You must pay
witness fees for current OPM employees
and any records certification fees by
submitting to the General Counsel a
check or money order for the
appropriate amount made payable to the
E:\FR\FM\23JNP1.SGM
23JNP1
35358
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 121 / Monday, June 23, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Treasury of the United States. In the
case of testimony by former OPM
employees, you must pay applicable
fees directly to the former employee in
accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1821 or other
applicable statutes.
(e) Certification (authentication) of
copies of records. The U.S. Office of
Personnel Management may certify that
records are true copies in order to
facilitate their use as evidence. If you
seek certification, you must request
certified copies from OPM at least 45
days before the date they will be
needed. The request should be sent to
the General Counsel. You will be
charged a certification fee of $15.00 for
each document certified.
(f) Waiver or reduction of fees. The
General Counsel, in his or her sole
discretion, may, upon a showing of
reasonable cause, waive or reduce any
fees in connection with the testimony,
production, or certification of records.
(g) De minimis fees. Fees will not be
assessed if the total charge would be
$10.00 or less.
Subpart D—Penalties
§ 295.401
Penalties.
(a) An employee who discloses
official records or information or gives
testimony relating to official
information, except as expressly
authorized by OPM or as ordered by a
Federal court after OPM has had the
opportunity to be heard, may face the
penalties provided in 18 U.S.C. 641 and
other applicable laws. Additionally,
former OPM employees are subject to
the restrictions and penalties of 18
U.S.C. 207 and 216.
(b) A current OPM employee who
testifies or produces official records and
information in violation of this part may
be subject to disciplinary action.
[FR Doc. E8–14059 Filed 6–20–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325–48–P
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Part 731
RIN 3206–AL38
Suitability
Office of Personnel
Management.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This proposed rule is one of
a number of initiatives the U.S. Office
of Personnel Management (OPM) has
undertaken to simplify and streamline
the system of Federal Government
investigative and adjudicative processes
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:51 Jun 20, 2008
Jkt 214001
to make them more efficient and as
equitable as possible. A key objective of
these initiatives is to limit duplication
of efforts by applying reciprocity where
appropriate to those processes. This
proposed rule would establish the
requirements for applying reciprocity to
Federal employment suitability
determinations and investigations.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before August 22, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Send or deliver written
comments to Ana A. Mazzi, Deputy
Associate Director for Workforce
Relations and Accountability Policy,
U.S. Office of Personnel Management,
Room 7H28, 1900 E Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20415; by FAX at (202)
606–2613; or by e-mail at
CWRAP@opm.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary
D. Wahlert by telephone at (202) 606–
2930; by FAX at (202) 606–2613; or by
e-mail at CWRAP@opm.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authorities
Under statutory authorities, 5 U.S.C.
1302, 3301, and 7301; Executive Order
10577, 3 CFR, 1945–1958 Comp., p. 218,
as amended; 5 CFR, parts 1, 2 and 5; and
related authorities, OPM is assigned the
responsibility for ensuring that
employees in the competitive service
and members of the career Senior
Executive Service (and such other
employees as may be designated by the
President) are suitable for Federal
employment. OPM’s regulations at 5
CFR part 731 describe the policies and
procedures for ensuring these
responsibilities are met, including the
delegation of suitability authority to
departments and agencies. Thus, any
proposed changes to these regulations
apply only to persons who are in, or in
the process of moving into, the
competitive service or career Senior
Executive Service.
Reciprocity of Background
Investigations
Under OPM’s current regulations at 5
CFR 731.104, a new background
investigation to determine suitability of
a current Federal employee in a covered
position (e.g., competitive service or
career SES position) is not required,
except when there has been a change in
the employee’s public trust risk level or
there is a need for reinvestigation under
law, rule, or regulation. Specifically, no
new investigation is required when a
person has been promoted, demoted,
reassigned, converted from careerconditional to career tenure, or
appointed or converted to an
appointment if the person has been
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
serving continuously with the
department or agency for at least 1 year
in one or more positions subject to
investigation. An investigation is also
not required when a person is
transferred from another department or
agency, provided the person has served
continuously for at least 1 year in a
position subject to investigation. While
the current regulation does not require
a new investigation in these
circumstances, departments and
agencies may choose to conduct an
investigation and determine a person’s
suitability where it is not required.
Additional suitability investigations
not required by law, rule, or regulation
are unnecessary and contribute to
inefficiencies in the Federal
Government’s hiring process. Therefore,
OPM is proposing to amend 5 CFR
731.104 to prohibit additional or
duplicative investigations on a person,
with some limited exceptions.
Under the changes contemplated, the
operative rule would be that, in any case
where the person previously was
investigated at a level that meets or
exceeds that required for the new
position, was determined suitable under
5 CFR 731 or fit based on character or
conduct criteria equivalent to the
suitability factors of 5 CFR 731.202, and
meets continuous service requirements
described in the regulations, reciprocity
would be required. The proposed
changes would require the application
of reciprocity of investigations in many
cases where a person is appointed or
converted to a covered position, or
transfers to a covered position, after
serving in another covered position. It
also would require reciprocity in many
cases where a person moves to a
covered position from a position in the
excepted service that is not a covered
position under this part, or from a
position as a Federal Government
contract employee. In cases where an
investigation of the level described had
been conducted, the gaining department
or agency could not, with the narrow
exceptions discussed below, conduct a
new investigation on that person.
A new investigation is required,
however, if the reciprocity requirements
described above are not met. Other
circumstances when an investigation
might be required occur when a
department or agency obtains new
information during the hiring process
when a person is transferred to a
covered position from another
department or agency, or appointed to a
covered position from Federal
Government contractor employment. In
those cases where the new information
calls into question the person’s
suitability under section 731.202, an
E:\FR\FM\23JNP1.SGM
23JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 121 (Monday, June 23, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 35354-35358]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-14059]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 121 / Monday, June 23, 2008 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 35354]]
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
5 CFR PART 295
RIN 3206-AL22
Testimony by OPM Employees and Production of Official Records in
Legal Proceedings
AGENCY: U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Office of Personnel Management seeks public comment
on a proposed rule that would set forth procedures that requesters
would have to follow when making demands or requests to an OPM employee
to produce official records or provide testimony relating to official
information, in connection with a legal proceeding in which OPM is not
a party. As proposed, this rule would establish procedures to respond
to such demands and requests in an orderly and consistent manner. The
proposed rule, among other benefits, will promote uniformity in
decisions, protect confidential information, provide guidance to
requesters, and reduce the potential for both inappropriate disclosures
of official information and wasteful allocation of agency resources.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 22, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to R. Alan Miller, Associate General Counsel,
U.S. Office of Personnel Management, Room 7353, 1900 E Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20415 or by electronic mail at Richard.Miller@opm.gov.
For e-mail messages, the subject line should include the following
reference: Proposed Rule on Testimony by OPM Employees and Production
of Official Records in Legal Proceedings.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: R. Alan Miller, 202-606-1700.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) occasionally receives
subpoenas and requests for OPM employees to provide evidence in
litigation in which OPM is not a party. Often these subpoenas and
requests are for OPM records that are not available to the public under
the Freedom of Information Act. Also, OPM sometimes receives subpoenas
and requests for OPM employees to appear as witnesses in litigation in
conjunction with a request for nonpublic records. Requesters have
sought information, for example, on retirement records, pay issues, and
other program matters, under OPM jurisdiction. Responding to such
demands and requests can result in a significant disruption to OPM
employees' work schedules. The result is that employees may be diverted
from performing their official duties in order to respond to requests
from parties in litigation. In order to address this problem, many
agencies over the years have issued regulations that are similar to
this proposed regulation, governing the circumstances and manner in
which an employee may respond to demands for testimony or for the
production of documents. Such a regulation was sustained by the United
States Supreme Court in United States ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S.
462 (1951).
In Touhy, the Supreme Court held that a U.S. Department of Justice
(DOJ) official, acting on order of the Attorney General, could not be
held in contempt for declining to produce records in response to a
subpoena. The employee's refusal was based upon a DOJ regulation that
prohibited disclosure of agency files, documents, records, or
information without the express approval of the Attorney General. The
Court sustained the validity of the DOJ regulations, reasoning that it
was appropriate for the Attorney General to prescribe regulations not
inconsistent with law for the custody, use and preservation of records,
papers, and property pertaining to the Department of Justice.
Briefly summarized, the proposed rule would prohibit disclosure of
nonpublic official records or testimony by OPM employees unless there
is compliance with the OPM rule. The proposed rule identifies the
factors that OPM will consider in making determinations in response to
such requests and what information requesters must provide. The
proposed rule also addresses when the request should be submitted, the
time period for review, potential fees, and any restrictions that may
be placed on the disclosure of records or the appearance of an OPM
employee as a witness if a request is granted. The proposed charges for
witnesses are the same as those provided by the Federal courts and the
fees related to production of records are the same as those charged
under FOIA. The proposed charges for time spent by an employee to
prepare for testimony and for certification of records by OPM are
authorized under 31 U.S.C. 9701, which permits an agency to charge for
services or things of value that are provided by the agency.
The proposed rule applies to a broad range of matters in legal
proceedings in which OPM is not a named party. It also applies to
former and current OPM employees as well as OPM consultants and
advisers. Former employees are prohibited from testifying about
specific matters for which they had responsibility during their active
employment unless permitted to testify as provided in the proposed
rule. They would not be barred from appearing to testify about general
matters unconnected with the specific matters for which they had
responsibility.
The proposed regulation will ensure a more efficient use of OPM
resources, minimize the possibility of involving OPM in issues
unrelated to its responsibilities, promote uniformity in responding to
such requests and subpoenas, prevent improper attempts to obtain
testimony from OPM personnel as to issues of law, prevent improper
attempts to use OPM personnel as expert witnesses against other Federal
agencies, and maintain the impartiality of OPM in matters among private
litigants. It also would serve OPM's interest in protecting sensitive,
confidential, and privilege information and records that are generated
in response to the requirements in the personnel laws and regulations.
The proposed OPM rule is internal, and is essentially procedural,
not substantive. It would neither create a right to obtain official
records or the testimony of an OPM employee nor create any additional
right or privilege not already available to OPM to deny any demand or
request therefor.
[[Page 35355]]
However, failure to comply with the procedures in the proposed rule
would be a basis for denying a demand or request submitted to OPM.
Administrative Procedure Act
This proposed rulemaking is in compliance with the Administrative
Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553) and allows for a 60-day comment period.
Interested persons are invited to submit written comments to OPM on
this proposed regulation, to be received on or before August 22, 2008.
OPM will review all comments received and consider any modifications to
this proposal which appear warranted.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
For purposes of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter
6), the proposed rule, if adopted, will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The proposed rule
addresses only the procedures to be followed in the production or
disclosure of OPM materials and information in litigation where OPM is
not a party. Accordingly, OPM has determined that a Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis is not required.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
For purposes of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C.
chapter 25, subchapter II), the proposed rule would not significantly
or uniquely affect small governments and would not result in increased
expenditures by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100 million or more (as adjusted for
inflation).
Executive Order 12866
In issuing this proposed regulation, OPM has adhered to the
regulatory philosophy and the applicable principles of regulation as
set forth in section 1 of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning
and Review. This proposed rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget under that Executive Order since it is not a
significant regulatory action within the meaning of the Executive
Order.
Executive Order 12988
As Director of OPM, I have reviewed this proposed regulation in
light of section 3 of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, and
certify that it meets the applicable standards provided therein.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35) does not apply
because this proposed regulation does not contain information
collection requirements that require approval by the Office of
Management and Budget. OPM expects the collection of information that
is called for by the proposed regulation would involve fewer than ten
persons each year.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 295
Administrative practice and procedures, Conflict of Interests,
Courts, Government employees, Records, Subpoenas, Testimony.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Linda M. Springer,
Director.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the preamble, the U.S.
Office of Personnel Management proposes to add a new part 295 to 5 CFR
to read as follows:
PART 295--TESTIMONY BY OPM EMPLOYEES AND PRODUCTION OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS IN LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Subpart A--General Provisions
Sec.
295.101 Scope and purpose.
295.102 Applicability.
295.103 Definitions.
Subpart B--Requests for Testimony and Production of Documents
295.201 General prohibition
295.202 Factors OPM will consider.
295.203 Filing requirements for demands or requests for documents or
testimony.
295.204 Service of subpoenas or requests.
295.205 Processing demands or requests.
295.206 Final determination.
295.207 Restrictions that apply to testimony
295.208 Restrictions that apply to released records.
295.209 Procedure when a decision is not made prior to the time a
response is required.
295.210 Procedure in the event of an adverse ruling.
Subpart C--Schedule of Fees
295.301 Fees.
Subpart D--Penalties
295.401 Penalties.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. App. (Sec. 1103, Civil Service Reform Act of
1978).
Subpart A--General Provisions
Sec. 295.101 Scope and purpose.
(a) This part sets forth policies and procedures you must follow
when you submit a demand or request to an employee of the U.S. Office
of Personnel Management (OPM) to produce official records and
information, or provide testimony relating to official information, in
connection with a legal proceeding. You must comply with these
requirements when you request the release or disclosure of official
records and information.
(b) OPM intends these provisions to:
(1) Promote economy and efficiency in its programs and operations;
(2) Minimize the possibility of involving OPM in controversial
issues not related to our functions;
(3) Prevent the misuse of OPM employees as involuntary expert
witnesses for private interests or as inappropriate expert witnesses as
to the state of the law;
(4) Maintain OPM's impartiality among private litigants where
neither OPM nor any other Federal entity is a named party; and
(5) Protect sensitive, confidential information and the
deliberative processes of OPM.
(c) In providing for these requirements, OPM does not waive the
sovereign immunity of the United States.
(d) This part provides guidance for the internal operations of OPM.
It does not create any right or benefits, substantive or procedural,
that a party may rely upon in any legal proceeding against the United
States.
Sec. 295.102 Applicability.
This part applies to demands and requests to employees of OPM in
legal proceedings in which OPM is not a named party, for factual or
expert testimony relating to official information or for production of
official records or information. However, it does not apply to:
(a) Demands upon or requests for a current OPM employee to testify
as to facts or events that are unrelated to his or her official duties
or that are unrelated to the functions of OPM;
(b) Demands upon or requests for a former OPM employee to testify
as to matters in which the former employee was not directly or
materially involved while at OPM;
(c) Requests for the release of records under the Freedom of
Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, or the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(a); and
(d) Congressional or Government Accountability Office (GAO) demands
and requests for testimony or records.
Sec. 295.103 Definitions.
Demand means a subpoena, or an order or other command of a court or
other competent authority, for the production, disclosure, or release
of records or for the appearance and testimony of an OPM employee that
is issued in a legal proceeding.
General Counsel means the General Counsel of OPM or a person to
whom
[[Page 35356]]
the General Counsel has delegated authority under this part.
Legal proceeding means any matter before a court of law,
administrative board or tribunal, commission, administrative law judge,
hearing officer, or other body that conducts a legal or administrative
proceeding. Legal proceeding includes all phases of litigation.
OPM means the U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
OPM employee or employee means:
(1) Any current or former officer or employee of OPM;
(2) Any other individual hired through contractual agreement by or
on behalf of the OPM or who has performed or is performing services
under such an agreement for OPM; and
(3) Any individual who served or is serving in any consulting or
advisory capacity to OPM, whether formal or informal.
(4) Provided, that this definition does not include persons who are
no longer employed by OPM and who are retained or hired as expert
witnesses or who agree to testify about general matters available to
the public, or matters with which they had no specific involvement or
responsibility during their employment with OPM.
Records or official records and information mean:
(1) All documents and materials which are OPM agency records under
the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552;
(2) All other documents and materials contained in OPM files; and
(3) All other information or materials acquired by an OPM employee
in the performance of his or her official duties or because of his or
her official status.
Request means any informal requests, by whatever method, for the
production of records and information or for testimony which has not
been ordered by a court or other competent authority.
Testimony means any written or oral statements, including
depositions, answers to interrogatories, affidavits, declarations,
recorded interviews, and statements made by an individual in connection
with a legal proceeding.
Subpart B--Requests for Testimony and Production of Documents
Sec. 295.201 General prohibition.
No employee may produce official records and information or provide
any testimony relating to official information in response to a demand
or request without the prior, written approval of the General Counsel.
Sec. 295.202 Factors OPM will consider.
The General Counsel, in his or her sole discretion, may grant an
employee permission to testify on matters relating to official
information, or produce official records and information, in response
to an appropriate demand or request. Among the relevant factors that
the General Counsel may consider in making this decision are whether:
(a) The purposes of this part are met;
(b) Allowing such testimony or production of records would be
necessary to prevent a miscarriage of justice;
(c) OPM has an interest in the decision that may be rendered in the
legal proceeding;
(d) Allowing such testimony or production of records would assist
or hinder OPM in performing its statutory duties or use OPM resources
in a way that will interfere with the ability of OPM employees to do
their regular work;
(e) Allowing such testimony or production of records would be in
the best interest of OPM or the United States;
(f) The records or testimony can be obtained from other sources;
(g) The demand or request is unduly burdensome or otherwise
inappropriate under the applicable rules of discovery or the rules of
procedure governing the case or matter in which the demand or request
arose;
(h) Disclosure would violate a statute, Executive order or
regulation;
(i) Disclosure would reveal confidential, sensitive, or privileged
information, trade secrets or similar, confidential commercial or
financial information, or would otherwise be inappropriate for release;
(j) Disclosure would impede or interfere with an ongoing law
enforcement investigation or proceedings, or compromise constitutional
rights;
(k) Disclosure would result in OPM appearing to favor one private
litigant over another private litigant;
(l) Disclosure relates to documents that were produced by another
agency;
(m) A substantial Government interest is implicated;
(n) The demand or request is within the authority of the party
making it;
(o) The demand improperly seeks to compel an OPM employee to serve
as an expert witness for a private interest;
(p) The demand improperly seeks to compel an OPM employee to
testify as to a matter of law;
(q) The demand or request is sufficiently specific to be answered.
Sec. 295.203 Filing requirements for demands or requests for
documents or testimony.
You must comply with the following requirements whenever you issue
demands or requests to an OPM employee for official records and
information or testimony.
(a) Your request must be in writing and must be submitted to the
General Counsel. If you serve a subpoena on OPM or an OPM employee
before submitting a written request and receiving a final
determination, OPM will oppose the subpoena on grounds that your
request was not submitted in accordance with this subpart.
(b) Your written request must contain the following information:
(1) The caption of the legal proceeding, docket number, and name
and address of the court or other authority involved.
(2) A copy of the complaint or equivalent document setting forth
the assertions in the case and any other pleading or document necessary
to show relevance;
(3) A list of categories of records sought, a detailed description
of how the information sought is relevant to the issues in the legal
proceeding, and a specific description of the substance of the
testimony or records sought;
(4) A statement as to how the need for the information outweighs
the need to maintain any confidentiality of the information and
outweighs the burden on OPM to produce the records or provide
testimony;
(5) A statement indicating that the information sought is not
available from another source, from other persons or entities, or from
the testimony of someone other than an OPM employee, such as a retained
expert;
(6) If testimony is requested, the intended use of the testimony, a
general summary of the desired testimony, and a showing that no
document could be provided and used in lieu of testimony;
(7) A description of all prior decisions, orders, or pending
motions in the case that bear upon the relevance of the requested
records or testimony;
(8) The name, address, and telephone number of counsel to each
party in the case; and
(9) An estimate of the amount of time that the requester and other
parties will require with each OPM employee for time spent by the
employee to prepare for testimony, in travel, and for attendance in the
legal proceeding.
(c) The Office of Personnel Management reserves the right to
require additional information to complete your request where
appropriate.
[[Page 35357]]
(d) Your request should be submitted at least 45 days before the
date that records or testimony is required. Requests submitted in less
than 45 days before records or testimony is required must be
accompanied by a written explanation stating the reasons for the late
request and the reasons for expedited processing.
(e) Failure to cooperate in good faith to enable the General
Counsel to make an informed decision may serve as the basis for a
determination not to comply with your request.
Sec. 295.204 Service of subpoenas or request.
Subpoenas or requests for official records or information or
testimony must be served on the General Counsel, U.S. Office of
Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW., Washington, DC 20415.
Sec. 295.205 Processing demands or requests.
(a) After service of a demand or request to testify, the General
Counsel will review the demand or request and, in accordance with the
provisions of this subpart, determine whether, or under what
conditions, to authorize the employee to testify on matters relating to
official information and/or produce official records and information.
(b) OPM will process requests in the order in which they are
received. Absent exigent or unusual circumstances, OPM will respond
within 45 days from the date that we receive it. The time for response
will depend upon the scope of the request.
(c) The General Counsel may grant a waiver of any procedure
described by this subpart where a waiver is considered necessary to
promote a significant interest of OPM or the United States or for other
good cause.
Sec. 295.206 Final determination.
The General Counsel makes the final determination on demands and
requests to employees for production of official records and
information or testimony. All final determinations are within the sole
discretion of the General Counsel. The General Counsel will notify the
requester and the court or other authority of the final determination,
the reasons for the grant or denial of the demand or request, and any
conditions that the General Counsel may impose on the release of
records or information, or on the testimony of an OPM employee.
Sec. 295.207 Restrictions that apply to testimony.
(a) The General Counsel may impose conditions or restrictions on
the testimony of OPM employees including, for example, limiting the
areas of testimony or requiring the requester and other parties to the
legal proceeding to agree that the transcript of the testimony will be
kept under seal or will only be used or made available in the
particular legal proceeding for which testimony was requested. The
General Counsel may also require a copy of the transcript of testimony
at the requester's expense.
(b) OPM may offer the employee's written declaration in lieu of
testimony.
(c) If authorized to testify pursuant to this part, an employee may
testify as to facts within his or her personal knowledge, but, unless
specifically authorized to do so by the General Counsel, the employee
shall not:
(1) Disclose confidential or privileged information;
(2) Testify as to facts when the General Counsel determines such
testimony would not be in the best interest of OPM or the United
States; or
(3) For a current OPM employee, testify as an expert or opinion
witness with regard to any matter arising out of the employee's
official duties or the functions of OPM unless testimony is being given
on behalf of the United States.
Sec. 295.208 Restrictions that apply to released records.
(a) The General Counsel may impose conditions or restrictions on
the release of official records and information, including the
requirement that parties to the proceeding obtain a protective order or
execute a confidentiality agreement to limit access and any further
disclosure. The terms of the protective order or of a confidentiality
agreement must be acceptable to the General Counsel. In cases where
protective orders or confidentiality agreements have already been
executed, OPM may condition the release of official records and
information on an amendment to the existing protective order or
confidentiality agreement.
(b) If the General Counsel so determines, original OPM records may
be presented for examination in response to a demand or request, but
they are not to be presented as evidence or otherwise used in a manner
by which they could lose their identity as official OPM records, and
they are not to be marked or altered. In lieu of the original records,
certified copies will be presented for evidentiary purposes (see 28
U.S.C. 1733).
Sec. 295.209 Procedure when a decision is not made prior to the time
a response is required.
If a response to a demand or request is required before the General
Counsel can make the determination referred to in Sec. 295.206, the
General Counsel will provide the court or other competent authority
with a copy of this part, inform the court or other competent authority
that the demand or request is being reviewed, and seek a stay of the
demand or request pending a final determination.
Sec. 295.210 Procedure in the event of an adverse ruling.
If the court or other competent authority fails to stay the demand,
the employee upon whom the demand is made will appear at the stated
time and place, produce a copy of this part, state that the employee
has been advised by counsel not to provide the requested testimony or
produce documents, and respectfully decline to comply with the demand,
citing United States ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 (1951). A
written response may be offered to a request, or to a demand, if
permitted by the court or other competent authority.
Subpart C--Schedule of Fees
Sec. 295.301 Fees.
(a) Generally. The General Counsel may condition the production of
records or appearance for testimony upon advance payment of a
reasonable estimate of the costs to OPM.
(b) Fees for records. Fees for producing records will include fees
for searching, reviewing, and duplicating records, costs of attorney
time spent in reviewing the demand or request, and expenses generated
by materials and equipment used to search for, produce, and copy the
responsive information. Costs for employee time will be calculated on
the basis of the hourly pay of the employee (including all pay,
allowance, and benefits). Fees for duplication will be the same as
those charged by OPM in its Freedom of Information Act regulations at 5
CFR part 294.
(c) Witness fees. Fees for attendance by a witness will include
fees, expenses, and allowances prescribed by the court's rules. If no
such fees are prescribed, witness fees will be determined based upon
the rule of the Federal district court closest to the location where
the witness will appear. Such fees will include cost of time spent by
the witness to prepare for testimony, in travel, and for attendance in
the legal proceeding.
(d) Payment of fees. You must pay witness fees for current OPM
employees and any records certification fees by submitting to the
General Counsel a check or money order for the appropriate amount made
payable to the
[[Page 35358]]
Treasury of the United States. In the case of testimony by former OPM
employees, you must pay applicable fees directly to the former employee
in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1821 or other applicable statutes.
(e) Certification (authentication) of copies of records. The U.S.
Office of Personnel Management may certify that records are true copies
in order to facilitate their use as evidence. If you seek
certification, you must request certified copies from OPM at least 45
days before the date they will be needed. The request should be sent to
the General Counsel. You will be charged a certification fee of $15.00
for each document certified.
(f) Waiver or reduction of fees. The General Counsel, in his or her
sole discretion, may, upon a showing of reasonable cause, waive or
reduce any fees in connection with the testimony, production, or
certification of records.
(g) De minimis fees. Fees will not be assessed if the total charge
would be $10.00 or less.
Subpart D--Penalties
Sec. 295.401 Penalties.
(a) An employee who discloses official records or information or
gives testimony relating to official information, except as expressly
authorized by OPM or as ordered by a Federal court after OPM has had
the opportunity to be heard, may face the penalties provided in 18
U.S.C. 641 and other applicable laws. Additionally, former OPM
employees are subject to the restrictions and penalties of 18 U.S.C.
207 and 216.
(b) A current OPM employee who testifies or produces official
records and information in violation of this part may be subject to
disciplinary action.
[FR Doc. E8-14059 Filed 6-20-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-48-P