Proposed Approval of the Central Characterization Project's Transuranic Waste Characterization Program at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 35133-35136 [E8-14006]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 120 / Friday, June 20, 2008 / Notices
EIS No. 20080179, ERP No. FS–FTA–
G40191–TX, Southeast Corridor
Project, Preferred Alternative is the
Light Rail Alternative, Proposed
Fixed-Guideway Transit System,
Funding, Metropolitan Transit
Authority (METRO) of Harris County,
Houston, Harris County, TX.
Summary: No formal comment letter
was sent to the preparing agency.
Dated: June 17, 2008.
Robert W. Hargrove,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office
of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. E8–14004 Filed 6–19–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[ER–FRL–8582–8]
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Environmental Impact Statements;
Notice of Availability
Responsible Agency: Office of Federal
Activities, General Information (202)
564–7167 or https://www.epa.gov/
compliance/nepa/.
Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact
Statements
Filed 06/09/2008 through 06/13/2008
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.
EIS No. 20080234, Draft EIS, AFS, WA,
Dosewallips Road Washout Project, to
Reestablish Road Access to both
Forest Service Road (FSR) 2610 and
Dosewallips Road, Hood Canal Ranger
District Olympic National Forest,
Olympic National Park, Jefferson
County, WA, Comment Period Ends:
08/19/2008, Contact: Tim Davis 360–
956–2375.
EIS No. 20080235, Final Supplement,
NOA, AK, Cook Inlet Beluga Whale
Subsistence Harvest Project, Proposes
to Implement a Long-Term Harvest
Plan and Fulfill the Federal
Government’s Trust Responsibility,
Cook Inlet, AK, Wait Period Ends: 07/
21/2008, Contact: Robert D Mecum
907–586–7235.
EIS No. 20080236, Final EIS, BIA, WA,
Spokane Tribes Integrated Resource
Management Plan (IRMP) for the
Spokane Indian Reservation,
Implementation, Stevens County, WA,
Wait Period Ends: 07/21/2008,
Contact: Donna Smith 509–258–4561.
EIS No. 20080237, Draft EIS, NPS, SD,
Wind Cave National Park Project, Elk
General Management Plan,
Implementation, Custer County, SD,
Comment Period Ends: 08/18/2008,
Contact: Nick Chevance 402–661–
1844.
EIS No. 20080238, Draft EIS, AFS, WY,
Off-Highway Vehicle (OHV) Route
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:53 Jun 19, 2008
Jkt 214001
Designation Project, Proposing to
Improve Management of Public
Summer Motorized Use (May 1–
November 30) by Designating Roads
and Motorized Trails, Bridger-Teton
National Forest, Buffalo, Jackson and
Big Piney Ranger Districts, Teton,
Lincoln and Sublette Counties, WY,
Comment Period Ends: 08/04/2008,
Contact: Linda Merigliano 307–739–
5428.
EIS No. 20080239, Draft Supplement,
UAF, MA, Pave Paws Early Warning
Radar Operation Project, Continued
Operation of the Solid-State PhasedArray Radar System (SSPARS), also
known as Pave, Phased Array
Warning Systems (PAWS), Cape Cod
Air Force Station, MA, Comment
Period Ends: 08/04/2008, Contact:
Lynne Neuman 719–554–6406.
EIS No. 20080240, Draft EIS, DOA, 00,
PROGRAMMATIC—Geothermal
Leasing in the Western United States,
Comment Period Ends: 09/17/2008,
Contact: Jack G. Peterson 208–373–
4048.
Department of the Interior/Bureau of
Land Management and Department of
Agriculture/Forest Service’s are Joint
Lead Agencies for the above project. The
contact person for (BLM) is Jack G.
Peterson at 208–373–4048 and the
contact person for (AFS) is Tracy Parker
at 703–605–4796.
Amended Notices
EIS No. 20080125, Draft EIS, FHW, NC,
I–26 Connector Project, Proposed
Multi-Land Freeway from I–40 to
US19–23–70 North of Asheville,
Funding, U.S. Coast Guard Permit,
U.S. Army COE section 10 and 404
Permit, Buncombe County, Asheville,
NC, Comment Period Ends: 06/23/
2008, Contact: John F. Sullivan III,
P.E. 919–856–4346 Ext. 122.
Revision of FR Notice Published 04/
11/2008: Extending Comment from 05/
19/2008 to 06/23/2008.
EIS No. 20080186, Draft EIS, FAA, NV,
City of Mesquite, Proposed
Replacement General Aviation
Airport, Implementation, Clark
County, NV, Comment Period Ends:
07/18/2008, Contact: Barry Franklin
650–876–2778.
Revision to FR Notice Publish 05/16/
2008: Extending Comment from 07/03/
2008 to 07/18/2008.
Dated: June 17, 2008.
Robert W. Hargrove,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office
of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. E8–14005 Filed 6–19–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
35133
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2008–0449; FRL–8683–4]
Proposed Approval of the Central
Characterization Project’s Transuranic
Waste Characterization Program at
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Notice of availability; opening
of public comment period.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA or we) is announcing the
availability of, and soliciting public
comments for 45 days on, the proposed
approval of the radioactive, contacthandled (CH), transuranic (TRU) waste
characterization program implemented
by the Central Characterization Project
(CCP) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory
(ORNL) in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. This
waste is intended for disposal at the
Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) in
New Mexico.
In accordance with the WIPP
Compliance Criteria, EPA evaluated the
characterization of CH TRU debris waste
from ORNL–CCP during an inspection
conducted the week of November 13,
2007. Using the systems and processes
developed as part of the U.S.
Department of Energy’s (DOE’s)
Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) program,
EPA verified whether DOE could
adequately characterize CH TRU waste
consistent with the Compliance Criteria.
The results of EPA’s evaluation of
ORNL–CCP’s program and its proposed
approval are described in the Agency’s
inspection report, which is available for
review in the public dockets listed in
ADDRESSES. We will consider public
comments received on or before the due
date mentioned in DATES.
This notice summarizes the waste
characterization processes evaluated by
EPA and EPA’s proposed approval. As
required by the 40 CFR 194.8, at the end
of a 45-day comment period EPA will
evaluate public comments received, and
if appropriate, finalize the reports
responding to the relevant public
comments, and issue a final report and
approval letter to DOE.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before August 4, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OAR–2008–0449, by one of the
following methods:
• https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• E-mail: a-and-r-docket@epa.gov.
• Fax: 202–566–1741.
E:\FR\FM\20JNN1.SGM
20JNN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
35134
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 120 / Friday, June 20, 2008 / Notices
• Mail: Air and Radiation Docket and
Information Center, Environmental
Protection Agency, Mailcode: 6102T,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Attn: Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–
2008–0449. The Agency’s policy is that
all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and
may be made available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes
information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available electronically at
https://www.regulations.gov. As
provided in EPA’s regulations at 40 CFR
Part 2, and in accordance with normal
EPA docket procedures, if copies of any
docket materials are requested, a
reasonable fee may be charged for
photocopying.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:53 Jun 19, 2008
Jkt 214001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
II. Background
Rajani Joglekar or Ed Feltcorn, Radiation
Protection Division, Center for Federal
Regulations, Mail Code 6608J, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington, DC,
20460; telephone number: 202–343–
9601; fax number: 202–343–2305; e-mail
address: joglekar.rajani@epa.gov or
feltcorn.ed@epa.gov.
DOE is developing the WIPP, near
Carlsbad in southeastern New Mexico,
as a deep geologic repository for
disposal of TRU radioactive waste. As
defined by the WIPP Land Withdrawal
Act (LWA) of 1992 (Pub. L. No. 102–
579), as amended (Pub. L. No. 104–201),
TRU waste consists of materials that
have atomic numbers greater than 92
(with half-lives greater than twenty
years), in concentrations greater than
100 nanocuries of alpha-emitting TRU
isotopes per gram of waste. Much of the
existing TRU waste consists of items
contaminated during the production of
nuclear weapons, such as rags,
equipment, tools, and sludges.
TRU waste is itself divided into two
categories, based on its level of
radioactivity. Contact-handled (CH)
TRU waste accounts for about 97
percent of the volume of TRU waste
currently destined for the WIPP. It is
packaged in 55-gallon metal drums or in
metal boxes and can be handled under
controlled conditions without any
shielding beyond the container itself.
The maximum radiation dose at the
surface of a CH TRU waste container is
200 millirems per hour. CH waste
primarily emits alpha particles that are
easily shielded by a sheet of paper or
the outer layer of a person’s skin.
Remote-handled (RH) TRU waste
emits more radiation than CH TRU
waste and must therefore be both
handled and transported in shielded
casks. Surface radiation levels of
unshielded containers of remotehandled transuranic waste exceed 200
millirems per hour. RH waste primarily
emits gamma radiation, which is very
penetrating and requires concrete, lead,
or steel to block it.
On May 13, 1998, EPA issued a final
certification of compliance for the WIPP
facility. The final rule was published in
the Federal Register on May 18, 1998
(63 FR 27354). EPA officially recertified
WIPP on March 29, 2006 (71 FR 18015).
Both the certification and recertification
determined that WIPP complies with
the Agency’s radioactive waste disposal
regulations at 40 CFR part 191, subparts
B and C, and is therefore safe to contain
TRU waste.
The final WIPP certification decision
includes conditions that (1) prohibit
shipment of TRU waste for disposal at
WIPP from any site other than the Los
Alamos National Laboratories (LANL)
until the EPA determines that the site
has established and executed a quality
assurance program, in accordance with
§§ 194.22(a)(2)(i), 194.24(c)(3), and
194.24(c)(5) for waste characterization
activities and assumptions (Condition 2
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. What Should I Consider as I Prepare
My Comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this
information to EPA through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly
mark the part or all of the information
that you claim to be CBI. For CBI
information in a disk or CD ROM that
you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the
disk or CD ROM as CBI and then
identify electronically within the disk or
CD ROM the specific information that is
claimed as CBI). In addition to one
complete version of the comment that
includes information claimed as CBI, a
copy of the comment that does not
contain the information claimed as CBI
must be submitted for inclusion in the
public docket. Information so marked
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in
40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for Preparing Your Comments.
When submitting comments, remember
to:
• Identify the rulemaking by docket
number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal
Register date and page number).
• Follow directions—The agency may
ask you to respond to specific questions
or organize comments by referencing a
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part
or section number.
• Explain why you agree or disagree;
suggest alternatives and substitute
language for your requested changes.
• Describe any assumptions and
provide any technical information and/
or data that you used.
• If you estimate potential costs or
burdens, explain how you arrived at
your estimate in sufficient detail to
allow for it to be reproduced.
• Provide specific examples to
illustrate your concerns, and suggest
alternatives.
• Explain your views as clearly as
possible, avoiding the use of profanity
or personal threats.
• Make sure to submit your
comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\20JNN1.SGM
20JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 120 / Friday, June 20, 2008 / Notices
of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 194); and
(2) (with the exception of specific,
limited waste streams and equipment at
LANL) prohibit shipment of TRU waste
for disposal at WIPP (from LANL or any
other site) until EPA has approved the
procedures developed to comply with
the waste characterization requirements
of § 194.22(c)(4) (Condition 3 of
Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 194). The
EPA’s approval process for waste
generator sites is described in § 194.8
(revised July 2004).
Condition 3 of the WIPP Certification
Decision requires EPA to conduct
independent inspections at DOE’s waste
generator/storage sites of their TRU
waste characterization capabilities
before approving their program and the
waste for disposal at the WIPP. EPA’s
inspection and approval process gives
EPA (a) Discretion in establishing
technical priorities, (b) the ability to
accommodate variation in the site’s
waste characterization capabilities, and
(c) flexibility in scheduling site WC
inspections.
As described in § 194.8(b), EPA’s
baseline inspections evaluate each WC
process component (equipment,
procedures, and personnel training/
experience) for its adequacy and
appropriateness in characterizing TRU
waste destined for disposal at WIPP.
During an inspection, the site
demonstrates its capabilities to
characterize TRU waste(s) and its ability
to comply with the regulatory limits and
tracking requirements under § 194.24. A
baseline inspection may describe any
limitations on approved waste streams
or waste characterization processes
[§ 194.8(b)(2)(iii)]. In addition, a
baseline inspection approval must
specify what subsequent WC program
changes or expansion should be
reported to EPA [§ 194.8(b)(4)]. The
Agency is required to assign Tier 1 (T1)
and Tier 2 (T2) to the reportable changes
depending on their potential impact on
data quality. A T1 designation requires
that the site must notify EPA of
proposed changes to the approved
components of an individual WC
process (such as radioassay equipment
or personnel), and EPA must also
approve the change before it can be
implemented. A WC element with a T2
designation allows the site to implement
changes to the approved components of
individual WC processes (such as visual
examination procedures) but requires
EPA notification. The Agency may
choose to inspect the site to evaluate
technical adequacy before approval.
EPA inspections conducted to evaluate
T1 or T2 changes are follow-up
inspections under the authority of
§ 194.24(h). In addition to the follow-up
inspections, if warranted, EPA may opt
to conduct continued compliance
inspections at TRU waste sites with a
baseline approval under the authority of
§ 194.24(h).
The site inspection and approval
process outlined in § 194.8 requires EPA
to issue a Federal Register notice
proposing the baseline compliance
decision, docket the inspection report
for public review, and seek public
comment on the proposed decision for
a period of 45 days. The report must
describe the WC processes EPA
inspected at the site, as well as their
compliance with § 194.24 requirements.
III. Proposed Baseline Compliance
Decision
EPA has performed a baseline
inspection of CH TRU waste
characterization (WC) activities at
ORNL–CCP (EPA Inspection No. EPA–
ORNL–CCP–CH–11.07–8). The purpose
of EPA’s inspection was to verify that
the waste characterization program
implemented at ORNL–CCP for
characterizing CH TRU, retrievablystored, debris waste is technically
adequate and meets the regulatory
requirements at 40 CFR 194.24.
During the inspection, EPA evaluated
the adequacy of the site’s WC programs
for CH TRU debris (S5000) waste to be
disposed of at the WIPP. The Agency
examined the following activities:
35135
• Acceptable knowledge (AK) for CH
retrievably-stored TRU debris waste
(S5000)
• One nondestructive assay (NDA)
system, the Drum Waste Assay System
Imaging Passive-Active Neutron/
Segmented Gamma Scanner (DWAS
IPAN/SGS) system for characterizing
debris (S5000) waste
• Real-time radiography (RTR) for CH
retrievably-stored TRU debris waste
(S5000)
• WIPP Waste Information System
(WWIS) for CH retrievably-stored TRU
debris waste (S5000)
During the inspection, ORNL–CCP
personnel stated that load management
will never be performed at the site and
EPA did not evaluate this aspect during
the inspection [see Section 8.1(5) of the
inspection report]. Therefore, this
proposed approval does not include
load management for ORNL–CCP.
The EPA inspection team determined
that the ORNL–CCP WC program for CH
TRU waste was technically adequate.
EPA is proposing to approve the ORNL–
CCP CH TRU WC program in the
configuration observed during this
inspection and described in docketed
inspection report and its’ attached
checklists (Attachments A.1 through
A.4). This proposed approval includes
the following:
(1) The AK process for CH retrievablystored TRU debris wastes
(2) The DWAS IPAN/SGS system for
assaying debris wastes
(3) The nondestructive examination
(NDE) process of RTR for retrievablystored debris wastes
(4) The WWIS process for tracking
waste contents of debris wastes
ORNL–CCP must report and receive
EPA approval of any Tier 1 (T1) changes
to the ORNL–CCP WC activities from
the date of the baseline inspection, and
must notify EPA regarding Tier 2 (T2)
changes according to Table 1, below.
The format of Table 1 in this report
closely follows the format used in
previous CH baseline approval reports.
TABLE 1.—TIERING OF TRU WC PROCESSES IMPLEMENTED BY ORNL–CCP BASED ON NOVEMBER 13–15, 2007, SITE
BASELINE INSPECTION
ORNL–CCP WC T1 changes
ORNL–CCP WC T2 changes a
Acceptable Knowledge (AK) and Load
Management.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
WC process elements
Implementation of load management;
AK (5).
Implementation of AK for wastes other
than retrievably-stored debris (i.e.,
retrievably stored soil/gravel and solids and/or any type of newly-generated waste); AK (15).
Notification to EPA upon completion of AK accuracy reports; AK (2).
Notification to EPA upon completion of new versions or updates/substantive modifications b of the following:
—Changes to AK–NDA communications and memoranda;
AK (3).
—Changes to site procedure; AK (4).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:53 Jun 19, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\20JNN1.SGM
20JNN1
35136
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 120 / Friday, June 20, 2008 / Notices
TABLE 1.—TIERING OF TRU WC PROCESSES IMPLEMENTED BY ORNL–CCP BASED ON NOVEMBER 13–15, 2007, SITE
BASELINE INSPECTION—Continued
WC process elements
ORNL–CCP WC T1 changes
Non Destructive Assay (NDA) .................
Real-Time Radiography (RTR) ................
Visual Examination (VE) ..........................
WIPP Waste Information System (WWIS)
New equipment or physical modifications to approved equipment; c NDA
(1).
Extension or changes to approved calibration range for approved equipment; NDA (2).
N/A ........................................................
Not approved at this time ......................
Implementation of load management;
WWIS (4).
ORNL–CCP WC T2 changes a
—AK summaries that describe wastes beyond the 144
containers described in this report; AK (6).
—Radiological Discrepancy Resolution Reports (AK–AK
and AK–NDA) pertinent to Waste Stream OR–NFS–CH–
HET; AK (11).
—Completed Attachments 4 and 6 and associated memoranda for Waste Stream OR–NFS–CH–HET; AK (10)
and (14).
—AK Summaries/Waste Stream Profile Forms (WSPFs)
and AK documentation reports; AK (15).
Notification to EPA upon completion of changes to software for approved equipment, operating range(s), and
site procedures that require CBFO approval; NDA (2).
Notification to EPA upon the following:
—Implementation of new RTR equipment or substantive
changes c to approved RTR equipment; RTR (1).
—Completion of changes to site RTR procedures requiring
CBFO approvals; RTR (2).
Not approved at this time.
Notification to EPA upon the following:
—Completion of changes to WWIS procedure(s) requiring
CBFO approvals; WWIS (1).
a Upon
receiving EPA approval, ORNL–CCP will report all T2 changes to EPA at the end of each fiscal quarter.
changes’’ means changes with the potential to impact the site’s WC activities or documentation thereof, excluding changes that
are solely related to ES&H, nuclear safety, or RCRA, or that are editorial in nature.
c Modifications to approved equipment include all changes with the potential to affect NDA data relative to waste isolation and exclude minor
changes, such as the addition of safety-related equipment.
b ‘‘Substantive
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
IV. Availability of the Baseline
Inspection Report for Public Comment
EPA has placed the report discussing
the results of the Agency’s inspection of
the ORNL–CCP Site in the public docket
as described in ADDRESSES. In
accordance with 40 CFR 194.8, EPA is
providing the public 45 days to
comment on these documents. The
Agency requests comments on the
proposed approval decision, as
described in the inspection report. EPA
will accept public comment on this
notice and supplemental information as
described in Section 1.B. above. EPA
will not make a determination of
compliance before the 45-day comment
period ends. At the end of the public
comment period, EPA will evaluate all
relevant public comments and revise the
inspection report as necessary. If
appropriate, the Agency will then issue
a final approval letter and inspection
report, both of which will be posted on
the WIPP Web site.
Information on the certification
decision is filed in the official EPA Air
Docket, Docket No. A–93–02 and is
available for review in Washington, DC,
and at the three EPA WIPP
informational docket locations in
Albuquerque, Carlsbad, and Santa Fe,
New Mexico. The dockets in New
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:53 Jun 19, 2008
Jkt 214001
Mexico contain only major items from
the official Air Docket in Washington,
DC, plus those documents added to the
official Air Docket since the October
1992 enactment of the WIPP LWA.
Dated: May 30, 2008.
Elizabeth Cotsworth,
Director, Office of Radiation and Indoor Air.
[FR Doc. E8–14006 Filed 6–19–08; 8:45 am]
PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:
Mr. Robert Biersack, Press Officer,
Telephone: (202) 694–1220.
Mary W. Dove,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. E8–13928 Filed 6–19–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6715–01–M
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Notice of Meeting
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
Sunshine Act Notices
Federal Election Commission.
Tuesday, June 17, 2008
at 10 a.m.
PLACE: 999 E Street, NW., Washington,
DC.
STATUS: This meeting will be closed to
the public.
ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED: Compliance
matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.
Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C.
437g, § 438(b), and Title 26, U.S.C.
Matters concerning participation in civil
actions or proceedings or arbitration.
Internal personnel rules and procedures
or matters affecting a particular
employee.
AGENCY:
DATE AND TIME:
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Federal
Maritime Commission.
TIME AND DATE: June 25, 2008—2 p.m.
PLACE: 800 North Capitol Street, NW.,
First Floor Hearing Room, Washington,
DC.
STATUS: A portion of the meeting will
be in Open Session and the remainder
of the meeting will be in Closed Session.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:
Open Session
(1) FMC Agreement No. 201186—
Mobile Container Terminal Cooperative
Working Agreement, effective July 4,
2008.
(2) FMC Agreement No. 201187—Port
of Seattle/Port of Tacoma Puget Sound
Air Quality Discussion Agreement,
effective July 5, 2008.
E:\FR\FM\20JNN1.SGM
20JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 120 (Friday, June 20, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35133-35136]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-14006]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0449; FRL-8683-4]
Proposed Approval of the Central Characterization Project's
Transuranic Waste Characterization Program at Oak Ridge National
Laboratory
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
ACTION: Notice of availability; opening of public comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or we) is announcing
the availability of, and soliciting public comments for 45 days on, the
proposed approval of the radioactive, contact-handled (CH), transuranic
(TRU) waste characterization program implemented by the Central
Characterization Project (CCP) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL)
in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. This waste is intended for disposal at the
Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) in New Mexico.
In accordance with the WIPP Compliance Criteria, EPA evaluated the
characterization of CH TRU debris waste from ORNL-CCP during an
inspection conducted the week of November 13, 2007. Using the systems
and processes developed as part of the U.S. Department of Energy's
(DOE's) Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) program, EPA verified whether DOE
could adequately characterize CH TRU waste consistent with the
Compliance Criteria. The results of EPA's evaluation of ORNL-CCP's
program and its proposed approval are described in the Agency's
inspection report, which is available for review in the public dockets
listed in ADDRESSES. We will consider public comments received on or
before the due date mentioned in DATES.
This notice summarizes the waste characterization processes
evaluated by EPA and EPA's proposed approval. As required by the 40 CFR
194.8, at the end of a 45-day comment period EPA will evaluate public
comments received, and if appropriate, finalize the reports responding
to the relevant public comments, and issue a final report and approval
letter to DOE.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 4, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OAR-2008-0449, by one of the following methods:
https://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: a-and-r-docket@epa.gov.
Fax: 202-566-1741.
[[Page 35134]]
Mail: Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center,
Environmental Protection Agency, Mailcode: 6102T, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Attn: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OAR-2008-0449. The Agency's policy is that all comments received will
be included in the public docket without change and may be made
available online at https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed
to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information
that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through https://www.regulations.gov your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public
docket visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at https://www.epa.gov/
epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available electronically at
https://www.regulations.gov. As provided in EPA's regulations at 40 CFR
Part 2, and in accordance with normal EPA docket procedures, if copies
of any docket materials are requested, a reasonable fee may be charged
for photocopying.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rajani Joglekar or Ed Feltcorn,
Radiation Protection Division, Center for Federal Regulations, Mail
Code 6608J, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Avenue, Washington, DC, 20460; telephone number: 202-343-9601; fax
number: 202-343-2305; e-mail address: joglekar.rajani@epa.gov or
feltcorn.ed@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
https://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of
the information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk
or CD ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM
as CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI). In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for Preparing Your Comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
Identify the rulemaking by docket number and other
identifying information (subject heading, Federal Register date and
page number).
Follow directions--The agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives
and substitute language for your requested changes.
Describe any assumptions and provide any technical
information and/or data that you used.
If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how
you arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and
suggest alternatives.
Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the
use of profanity or personal threats.
Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
II. Background
DOE is developing the WIPP, near Carlsbad in southeastern New
Mexico, as a deep geologic repository for disposal of TRU radioactive
waste. As defined by the WIPP Land Withdrawal Act (LWA) of 1992 (Pub.
L. No. 102-579), as amended (Pub. L. No. 104-201), TRU waste consists
of materials that have atomic numbers greater than 92 (with half-lives
greater than twenty years), in concentrations greater than 100
nanocuries of alpha-emitting TRU isotopes per gram of waste. Much of
the existing TRU waste consists of items contaminated during the
production of nuclear weapons, such as rags, equipment, tools, and
sludges.
TRU waste is itself divided into two categories, based on its level
of radioactivity. Contact-handled (CH) TRU waste accounts for about 97
percent of the volume of TRU waste currently destined for the WIPP. It
is packaged in 55-gallon metal drums or in metal boxes and can be
handled under controlled conditions without any shielding beyond the
container itself. The maximum radiation dose at the surface of a CH TRU
waste container is 200 millirems per hour. CH waste primarily emits
alpha particles that are easily shielded by a sheet of paper or the
outer layer of a person's skin.
Remote-handled (RH) TRU waste emits more radiation than CH TRU
waste and must therefore be both handled and transported in shielded
casks. Surface radiation levels of unshielded containers of remote-
handled transuranic waste exceed 200 millirems per hour. RH waste
primarily emits gamma radiation, which is very penetrating and requires
concrete, lead, or steel to block it.
On May 13, 1998, EPA issued a final certification of compliance for
the WIPP facility. The final rule was published in the Federal Register
on May 18, 1998 (63 FR 27354). EPA officially recertified WIPP on March
29, 2006 (71 FR 18015). Both the certification and recertification
determined that WIPP complies with the Agency's radioactive waste
disposal regulations at 40 CFR part 191, subparts B and C, and is
therefore safe to contain TRU waste.
The final WIPP certification decision includes conditions that (1)
prohibit shipment of TRU waste for disposal at WIPP from any site other
than the Los Alamos National Laboratories (LANL) until the EPA
determines that the site has established and executed a quality
assurance program, in accordance with Sec. Sec. 194.22(a)(2)(i),
194.24(c)(3), and 194.24(c)(5) for waste characterization activities
and assumptions (Condition 2
[[Page 35135]]
of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 194); and (2) (with the exception of
specific, limited waste streams and equipment at LANL) prohibit
shipment of TRU waste for disposal at WIPP (from LANL or any other
site) until EPA has approved the procedures developed to comply with
the waste characterization requirements of Sec. 194.22(c)(4)
(Condition 3 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 194). The EPA's approval
process for waste generator sites is described in Sec. 194.8 (revised
July 2004).
Condition 3 of the WIPP Certification Decision requires EPA to
conduct independent inspections at DOE's waste generator/storage sites
of their TRU waste characterization capabilities before approving their
program and the waste for disposal at the WIPP. EPA's inspection and
approval process gives EPA (a) Discretion in establishing technical
priorities, (b) the ability to accommodate variation in the site's
waste characterization capabilities, and (c) flexibility in scheduling
site WC inspections.
As described in Sec. 194.8(b), EPA's baseline inspections evaluate
each WC process component (equipment, procedures, and personnel
training/experience) for its adequacy and appropriateness in
characterizing TRU waste destined for disposal at WIPP. During an
inspection, the site demonstrates its capabilities to characterize TRU
waste(s) and its ability to comply with the regulatory limits and
tracking requirements under Sec. 194.24. A baseline inspection may
describe any limitations on approved waste streams or waste
characterization processes [Sec. 194.8(b)(2)(iii)]. In addition, a
baseline inspection approval must specify what subsequent WC program
changes or expansion should be reported to EPA [Sec. 194.8(b)(4)]. The
Agency is required to assign Tier 1 (T1) and Tier 2 (T2) to the
reportable changes depending on their potential impact on data quality.
A T1 designation requires that the site must notify EPA of proposed
changes to the approved components of an individual WC process (such as
radioassay equipment or personnel), and EPA must also approve the
change before it can be implemented. A WC element with a T2 designation
allows the site to implement changes to the approved components of
individual WC processes (such as visual examination procedures) but
requires EPA notification. The Agency may choose to inspect the site to
evaluate technical adequacy before approval. EPA inspections conducted
to evaluate T1 or T2 changes are follow-up inspections under the
authority of Sec. 194.24(h). In addition to the follow-up inspections,
if warranted, EPA may opt to conduct continued compliance inspections
at TRU waste sites with a baseline approval under the authority of
Sec. 194.24(h).
The site inspection and approval process outlined in Sec. 194.8
requires EPA to issue a Federal Register notice proposing the baseline
compliance decision, docket the inspection report for public review,
and seek public comment on the proposed decision for a period of 45
days. The report must describe the WC processes EPA inspected at the
site, as well as their compliance with Sec. 194.24 requirements.
III. Proposed Baseline Compliance Decision
EPA has performed a baseline inspection of CH TRU waste
characterization (WC) activities at ORNL-CCP (EPA Inspection No. EPA-
ORNL-CCP-CH-11.07-8). The purpose of EPA's inspection was to verify
that the waste characterization program implemented at ORNL-CCP for
characterizing CH TRU, retrievably-stored, debris waste is technically
adequate and meets the regulatory requirements at 40 CFR 194.24.
During the inspection, EPA evaluated the adequacy of the site's WC
programs for CH TRU debris (S5000) waste to be disposed of at the WIPP.
The Agency examined the following activities:
Acceptable knowledge (AK) for CH retrievably-stored TRU
debris waste (S5000)
One nondestructive assay (NDA) system, the Drum Waste
Assay System Imaging Passive-Active Neutron/Segmented Gamma Scanner
(DWAS IPAN/SGS) system for characterizing debris (S5000) waste
Real-time radiography (RTR) for CH retrievably-stored TRU
debris waste (S5000)
WIPP Waste Information System (WWIS) for CH retrievably-
stored TRU debris waste (S5000)
During the inspection, ORNL-CCP personnel stated that load
management will never be performed at the site and EPA did not evaluate
this aspect during the inspection [see Section 8.1(5) of the inspection
report]. Therefore, this proposed approval does not include load
management for ORNL-CCP.
The EPA inspection team determined that the ORNL-CCP WC program for
CH TRU waste was technically adequate. EPA is proposing to approve the
ORNL-CCP CH TRU WC program in the configuration observed during this
inspection and described in docketed inspection report and its'
attached checklists (Attachments A.1 through A.4). This proposed
approval includes the following:
(1) The AK process for CH retrievably-stored TRU debris wastes
(2) The DWAS IPAN/SGS system for assaying debris wastes
(3) The nondestructive examination (NDE) process of RTR for
retrievably-stored debris wastes
(4) The WWIS process for tracking waste contents of debris wastes
ORNL-CCP must report and receive EPA approval of any Tier 1 (T1)
changes to the ORNL-CCP WC activities from the date of the baseline
inspection, and must notify EPA regarding Tier 2 (T2) changes according
to Table 1, below. The format of Table 1 in this report closely follows
the format used in previous CH baseline approval reports.
Table 1.--Tiering of TRU WC Processes Implemented by ORNL-CCP Based on November 13-15, 2007, Site Baseline
Inspection
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WC process elements ORNL-CCP WC T1 changes ORNL-CCP WC T2 changes a
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Acceptable Knowledge (AK) and Load Implementation of load Notification to EPA upon completion of
Management. management; AK (5). AK accuracy reports; AK (2).
Implementation of AK for Notification to EPA upon completion of
wastes other than retrievably- new versions or updates/substantive
stored debris (i.e., modifications b of the following:
retrievably stored soil/
gravel and solids and/or any
type of newly-generated
waste); AK (15).
--Changes to AK-NDA communications and
memoranda; AK (3).
--Changes to site procedure; AK (4).
[[Page 35136]]
--AK summaries that describe wastes
beyond the 144 containers described in
this report; AK (6).
--Radiological Discrepancy Resolution
Reports (AK-AK and AK-NDA) pertinent to
Waste Stream OR-NFS-CH-HET; AK (11).
--Completed Attachments 4 and 6 and
associated memoranda for Waste Stream
OR-NFS-CH-HET; AK (10) and (14).
--AK Summaries/Waste Stream Profile
Forms (WSPFs) and AK documentation
reports; AK (15).
Non Destructive Assay (NDA)........... New equipment or physical Notification to EPA upon completion of
modifications to approved changes to software for approved
equipment; c NDA (1). equipment, operating range(s), and site
procedures that require CBFO approval;
NDA (2).
Extension or changes to ........................................
approved calibration range
for approved equipment; NDA
(2).
Real-Time Radiography (RTR)........... N/A........................... Notification to EPA upon the following:
--Implementation of new RTR equipment or
substantive changes c to approved RTR
equipment; RTR (1).
--Completion of changes to site RTR
procedures requiring CBFO approvals;
RTR (2).
Visual Examination (VE)............... Not approved at this time..... Not approved at this time.
WIPP Waste Information System (WWIS).. Implementation of load Notification to EPA upon the following:
management; WWIS (4).
--Completion of changes to WWIS
procedure(s) requiring CBFO approvals;
WWIS (1).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
a Upon receiving EPA approval, ORNL-CCP will report all T2 changes to EPA at the end of each fiscal quarter.
b ``Substantive changes'' means changes with the potential to impact the site's WC activities or documentation
thereof, excluding changes that are solely related to ES&H, nuclear safety, or RCRA, or that are editorial in
nature.
c Modifications to approved equipment include all changes with the potential to affect NDA data relative to
waste isolation and exclude minor changes, such as the addition of safety-related equipment.
IV. Availability of the Baseline Inspection Report for Public Comment
EPA has placed the report discussing the results of the Agency's
inspection of the ORNL-CCP Site in the public docket as described in
ADDRESSES. In accordance with 40 CFR 194.8, EPA is providing the public
45 days to comment on these documents. The Agency requests comments on
the proposed approval decision, as described in the inspection report.
EPA will accept public comment on this notice and supplemental
information as described in Section 1.B. above. EPA will not make a
determination of compliance before the 45-day comment period ends. At
the end of the public comment period, EPA will evaluate all relevant
public comments and revise the inspection report as necessary. If
appropriate, the Agency will then issue a final approval letter and
inspection report, both of which will be posted on the WIPP Web site.
Information on the certification decision is filed in the official
EPA Air Docket, Docket No. A-93-02 and is available for review in
Washington, DC, and at the three EPA WIPP informational docket
locations in Albuquerque, Carlsbad, and Santa Fe, New Mexico. The
dockets in New Mexico contain only major items from the official Air
Docket in Washington, DC, plus those documents added to the official
Air Docket since the October 1992 enactment of the WIPP LWA.
Dated: May 30, 2008.
Elizabeth Cotsworth,
Director, Office of Radiation and Indoor Air.
[FR Doc. E8-14006 Filed 6-19-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
