Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 707 Airplanes and Model 720 and 720B Series Airplanes, 35092-35093 [E8-13925]
Download as PDF
35092
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 120 / Friday, June 20, 2008 / Proposed Rules
(i) For airplanes on which the modification
specified in BAe Systems (Operations)
Limited Service Bulletin J41–A32–084
(Modification JM41670), dated November 30,
2005, has not been accomplished, repeat the
actions specified in paragraph (j)(1) of this
AD at intervals not to exceed 800 flight hours
after the last inspection done in accordance
with paragraph (j) of this AD.
(ii) For airplanes on which the
modification specified in BAe Systems
(Operations) Limited Service Bulletin J41–
A32–084 (Modification JM41670), dated
November 30, 2005, has been accomplished,
repeat the actions specified in paragraph
(j)(1) of this AD at intervals not to exceed
3,000 flight hours after the last inspection
done in accordance with paragraph (j) of this
AD.
(2) For NLG capsules that do not have
adequate free movement: Before further
flight, replace the NLG assembly with a
serviceable assembly in accordance with the
service bulletin. Thereafter, repeat the
actions specified in paragraph (j) of this AD
at the applicable interval specified in
paragraph (j)(1) of this AD.
Replace the NLG Assembly With a Modified
NLG Assembly
(k) Within 48 months after the effective
date of this AD: Replace the NLG assembly
with a modified assembly, in accordance
with BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
Service Bulletin J41–32–084, dated
November 30, 2005. Thereafter, repeat the
actions specified in paragraph (j) of this AD
at the applicable interval specified in
paragraph (j)(1) of this AD.
Parts Installation
(l) As of the effective date of this AD, no
person may install a NLG on any airplane
unless it has been inspected in accordance
with paragraph (j) of this AD.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Related Information
(n) European Aviation Safety Agency
airworthiness directive 2006–0131, dated
May 18, 2006, also addresses the subject of
this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 9,
2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–13919 Filed 6–19–08; 8:45 am]
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:17 Jun 19, 2008
Jkt 214001
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2008–0645; Directorate
Identifier 2007–NM–358–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing
Model 707 Airplanes and Model 720
and 720B Series Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Boeing Model 707 airplanes and Model
720 and 720B series airplanes. This
proposed AD would require performing
an operational test of the engine fuel
suction feed of the fuel system, and
other related testing if necessary. This
proposed AD results from a report of inservice occurrences of loss of fuel
system suction feed capability, followed
by total loss of pressure of the fuel feed
system. We are proposing this AD to
detect and correct failure of the engine
fuel suction feed of the fuel system,
which could result in multi-engine
flameout, inability to restart the engines,
and consequent forced landing of the
airplane.
SUMMARY:
We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by August 4, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124–2207.
DATES:
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(m)(1) The Manager, International Branch,
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested in accordance with
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector
(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District
Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(telephone 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sue
Lucier, Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion
Branch, ANM–140S, FAA, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, Washington
98057–3356; telephone (425) 917–6438;
fax (425) 917–6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2008–0645; Directorate Identifier
2007–NM–358–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We have received a report of inservice occurrences of loss of fuel
system suction feed capability, followed
by total loss of pressure of the fuel feed
system. This report prompted us to
review the service history of all Boeing
airplane models, and we found
instances of loose and leaking fuel line
fittings. This condition, if not corrected,
could result in multi-engine flameout,
inability to restart the engines, and
consequent forced landing of the
airplane.
Explanation of Relevant Service
Information
We have reviewed Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin A3527, dated
November 7, 2007. The service bulletin
describes procedures for performing an
operational test of the engine fuel
suction feed of the fuel system, and
other related testing if necessary. The
other related testing includes doing a
vacuum test on the applicable engine for
leakage if an engine’s N1, N2, or fuel-
E:\FR\FM\20JNP1.SGM
20JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 120 / Friday, June 20, 2008 / Proposed Rules
flow parameters deteriorate during the
test. If any leakage is found in the
couplings, the o-rings should be
replaced; if any leakage is found in the
fuel line, the fuel line should be
replaced.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
We are proposing this AD because we
have evaluated all pertinent information
and identified an unsafe condition that
is likely to exist or develop on other
airplanes of this same type design. For
this reason, we are proposing this AD,
which would require accomplishing the
actions specified in the service
information described previously.
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
You can find our regulatory
evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD Docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
would affect 21 airplanes of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would
take 1 work-hour per product, per test,
to comply with this proposed AD. The
average labor rate is $80 per work-hour.
Based on these figures, we estimate the
cost of this proposed AD to the U.S.
operators to be $1,680, or $80 per
product, per test.
§ 39.13
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:17 Jun 19, 2008
Jkt 214001
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
[Amended]
35093
as applicable, before further flight, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
A3527, dated November 7, 2007. Repeat the
operational test thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 6,000 flight hours.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(g)(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO, FAA,
ATTN: Sue Lucier, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM–140S, FAA, Seattle
ACO, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425)
917–6438; fax (425) 917–6590, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector
(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District
Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
Issued in Renton, Washington on June 9,
2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–13925 Filed 6–19–08; 8:45 am]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Boeing: Docket No. FAA–2008–0645;
Directorate Identifier 2007–NM–358–AD.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by August
4, 2008.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from a report of inservice occurrences of loss of fuel system
suction feed capability, followed by total loss
of pressure of the fuel feed system. We are
issuing this AD to detect and correct failure
of the engine fuel suction feed of the fuel
system, which could result in multi-engine
flameout, inability to restart the engines, and
consequent forced landing of the airplane.
Compliance
(e) Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
Operational Test/Other Specified Actions
(f) Within 18 months after the effective
date of this AD, perform an operational test
of the engine fuel suction feed of the fuel
system, and perform all other related testing,
Frm 00005
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2008–0646; Directorate
Identifier 2007–NM–359–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to all Boeing Model
707–100 long body, –200, –100B long body,
and –100B short body series airplanes; and
Model 707–300, –300B, –300C, and –400
series airplanes; and Model 720 and 720B
series airplanes; certificated in any category.
PO 00000
Federal Aviation Administration
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing
Model 727 Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Boeing Model 727 airplanes. This
proposed AD would require performing
an operational test of the engine fuel
suction feed of the fuel system, and
other related testing if necessary. This
proposed AD results from a report of inservice occurrences of loss of fuel
system suction feed capability, followed
by total loss of pressure of the fuel feed
system. We are proposing this AD to
detect and correct failure of the engine
fuel suction feed of the fuel system,
which could result in multi-engine
flameout, inability to restart the engines,
and consequent forced landing of the
airplane.
E:\FR\FM\20JNP1.SGM
20JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 120 (Friday, June 20, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 35092-35093]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-13925]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2008-0645; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-358-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 707 Airplanes and Model
720 and 720B Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Boeing Model 707 airplanes and Model 720 and 720B series airplanes.
This proposed AD would require performing an operational test of the
engine fuel suction feed of the fuel system, and other related testing
if necessary. This proposed AD results from a report of in-service
occurrences of loss of fuel system suction feed capability, followed by
total loss of pressure of the fuel feed system. We are proposing this
AD to detect and correct failure of the engine fuel suction feed of the
fuel system, which could result in multi-engine flameout, inability to
restart the engines, and consequent forced landing of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by August 4, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (telephone 800-647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sue Lucier, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM-140S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification
Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone
(425) 917-6438; fax (425) 917-6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2008-0645;
Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-358-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We have received a report of in-service occurrences of loss of fuel
system suction feed capability, followed by total loss of pressure of
the fuel feed system. This report prompted us to review the service
history of all Boeing airplane models, and we found instances of loose
and leaking fuel line fittings. This condition, if not corrected, could
result in multi-engine flameout, inability to restart the engines, and
consequent forced landing of the airplane.
Explanation of Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin A3527, dated
November 7, 2007. The service bulletin describes procedures for
performing an operational test of the engine fuel suction feed of the
fuel system, and other related testing if necessary. The other related
testing includes doing a vacuum test on the applicable engine for
leakage if an engine's N1, N2, or fuel-
[[Page 35093]]
flow parameters deteriorate during the test. If any leakage is found in
the couplings, the o-rings should be replaced; if any leakage is found
in the fuel line, the fuel line should be replaced.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
We are proposing this AD because we have evaluated all pertinent
information and identified an unsafe condition that is likely to exist
or develop on other airplanes of this same type design. For this
reason, we are proposing this AD, which would require accomplishing the
actions specified in the service information described previously.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 21 airplanes of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would take 1 work-hour per product,
per test, to comply with this proposed AD. The average labor rate is
$80 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this
proposed AD to the U.S. operators to be $1,680, or $80 per product, per
test.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866, 2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory
Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
You can find our regulatory evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD Docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
Boeing: Docket No. FAA-2008-0645; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-
358-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by August 4, 2008.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to all Boeing Model 707-100 long body, -200,
-100B long body, and -100B short body series airplanes; and Model
707-300, -300B, -300C, and -400 series airplanes; and Model 720 and
720B series airplanes; certificated in any category.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from a report of in-service occurrences of
loss of fuel system suction feed capability, followed by total loss
of pressure of the fuel feed system. We are issuing this AD to
detect and correct failure of the engine fuel suction feed of the
fuel system, which could result in multi-engine flameout, inability
to restart the engines, and consequent forced landing of the
airplane.
Compliance
(e) Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
Operational Test/Other Specified Actions
(f) Within 18 months after the effective date of this AD,
perform an operational test of the engine fuel suction feed of the
fuel system, and perform all other related testing, as applicable,
before further flight, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin A3527, dated November
7, 2007. Repeat the operational test thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 6,000 flight hours.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(g)(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO, FAA, ATTN: Sue Lucier,
Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion Branch, ANM-140S, FAA, Seattle ACO,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
917-6438; fax (425) 917-6590, has the authority to approve AMOCs for
this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
Issued in Renton, Washington on June 9, 2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-13925 Filed 6-19-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P