Exchange Visitor Program-Au Pairs, 34861-34862 [E8-13796]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 119 / Thursday, June 19, 2008 / Rules and Regulations on behalf of the manufacturer as provided in section 536(d) of Subchapter C—Electronic Product Radiation Control of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (formerly the Radiation Control for Health and Safety Act of 1968) (21 U.S.C. 360mm(d)) and this section. The agent may be an individual, a firm, or a domestic corporation. For purposes of this section, any number of manufacturers may designate the same agent. * * * * * (c) Service of any process, notice, order, requirement, or decision specified in section 536(d) of Subchapter C—Electronic Product Radiation Control of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (formerly the Radiation Control for Health and Safety Act of 1968) (21 U.S.C. 360mm(d)) may be made by registered or certified mail addressed to the agent with return receipt requested, or in any other manner authorized by law. * * * keeping with the purposes of Subchapter C—Electronic Product Radiation Control of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (formerly the Radiation Control for Health and Safety Act of 1968), and: (i) The scope of the requested variance is so limited in its applicability as not to justify an amendment to the standard, or (ii) There is not sufficient time for the promulgation of an amendment to the standard. * * * * * Dated: June 13, 2008. Jeffrey Shuren, Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning. [FR Doc. E8–13915 Filed 6–18–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4160–01–S DEPARTMENT OF STATE 22 CFR Part 62 PART 1010—PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS: GENERAL RIN 1400–AC48 29. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 1010 continues to read as follows: Exchange Visitor Program—Au Pairs Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 352, 360, 360e– 360j, 371, 381; 42 U.S.C. 263b–263n. ACTION: [Public Notice: 6265] I 30. Section 1010.1 is revised to read as follows: I § 1010.1 Scope. The standards listed in this subchapter are prescribed pursuant to section 534 of Subchapter C—Electronic Product Radiation Control of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (formerly the Radiation Control for Health and Safety Act of 1968) (21 U.S.C. 360kk) and are applicable to electronic products as specified herein, to control electronic product radiation from such products. Standards so prescribed are subject to amendment or revocation and additional standards may be prescribed as are determined necessary for the protection of the public health and safety. I 31. In § 1010.4, paragraph (a)(1) is revised to read as follows: jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES § 1010.4 Variances. (a) Criteria for variances. (1) Upon application by a manufacturer (including an assembler), the Director, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, may grant a variance from one or more provisions of any performance standard under subchapter J of this chapter for an electronic product subject to such standard when the Director determines that granting such a variance is in VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:32 Jun 18, 2008 Jkt 214001 Department of State. Interim Final Rule with request for comment. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Department is hereby revising its regulations regarding Au Pairs. The Interim Final Rule revises the section on repeat participation to allow qualified au pairs to repeat the program after a period of at least two years residency outside the United States following the end date of his or her initial program. DATES: This rule is effective 30 days from July 21, 2008. The Department will accept comments from the public up to 30 days from July 21, 2008. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods: • Persons with access to the Internet may view this notice and provide comments by going to the regulations.gov Web site at: https:// www.regulations.gov/index.cfm. • E-mail: jexchanges@state.gov. You must include the RIN (1400–AC48) in the subject line of your message. • Mail (paper, disk, or CD–ROM submissions): U.S. Department of State, Office of Exchange Coordination and Designation, SA–44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 734, Washington, DC 20547. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stanley S. Colvin, Director, Office of Exchange Coordination and Designation, U.S. Department of State, SA–44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 734, PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 34861 Washington, DC 20547; or e-mail at jexchanges@state.gov. On December 10, 2007, the Department of State published a Notice with request for comments to solicit views on the age eligibility requirement for au pair participants, an increase of the age limitation from 26 to 30, and whether to allow a foreign national who previously participated in the au pair program to repeat the program. A total of seven comments were received in response to the Notice. All seven comments were in favor of increasing the age requirement and permitting repeat participation. The au pair program is one of five workbased exchange opportunities available through the Exchange Visitor Program. These programs are targeted toward young adults aged 18–26. At this time, the Department believes the synergies of the program are enhanced by retaining its focus on participants in this age range. On the other hand, as the result of repeat participation, au pair sponsors will be able to select from a larger pool of candidates. The Department has determined that an au pair who has successfully completed the au pair program may repeat program participation provided that he or she has resided outside the United States for a period of at least two years after the completion of initial participation in the au pair program (including the educational component requirement) and is within the regulatory age range for eligibility. An au pair who has previously participated is likely to be more familiar with the American culture (thereby quickly overcoming cultural challenges), is a proven successful caretaker, and will be able to build on the skills previously acquired. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Regulatory Analysis Administrative Procedure Act The Department has determined that this Final Rule involves a foreign affairs function of the United States and is consequently exempt from the procedures required by 5 U.S.C. 553 pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1). Nonetheless, because of its importance to the public, the Department elected to solicit comments during a 60-day comment period. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 This rule has been found not to be a major rule within the meaning of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. E:\FR\FM\19JNR1.SGM 19JNR1 34862 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 119 / Thursday, June 19, 2008 / Rules and Regulations Paperwork Reduction Act Regulatory Flexibility Act/Executive Order 13272: Small Business Since this rulemaking is exempt from 5 U.S.C. 553, and no other law requires the Department to give notice of proposed rulemaking, this rulemaking also is not subject to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.) and Executive Order 13272, section 3(b). Executive Order 12866, as Amended The Department of State does not consider this Final Rule to be a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866, as amended, § 3(f), Regulatory Planning and Review. In addition, the Department is exempt from Executive Order 12866 except to the extent that it is promulgating regulations in conjunction with a domestic agency that are significant regulatory actions. The Department has nevertheless reviewed the Proposed Rule to ensure its consistency with the regulatory philosophy and principles set forth in that Executive Order. Executive Order 12988 The Department has reviewed this Final Rule in light of §§ 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988 to eliminate ambiguity, minimize litigation, establish clear legal standards, and reduce burden. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. 1532, generally requires agencies to prepare a statement before proposing any rule that may result in an annual expenditure of $100 million or more by State, local, or tribal governments, or by the private sector. This Final Rule will not result in any such expenditure, nor will it significantly or uniquely affect small governments. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE This Interim Final Rule does not impose any new reporting or recordkeeping requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35. Department of the Navy List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 62 Accordingly, 22 CFR Part 62 is revised to read as follows: SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy is amending its certifications and exemptions under the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972 (72 COLREGS), to reflect that the Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate General (Admiralty and Maritime Law) has determined that USS NASHVILLE (LPD 13) is a vessel of the Navy which, due to its special construction and purpose, cannot fully comply with certain provisions of the 72 COLREGS without interfering with its special function as a naval ship. The intended effect of this rule is to warn mariners in waters where 72 COLREGS apply. DATES: This rule is effective June 19, 2008 and is applicable beginning 11 June 2008. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Commander M. Robb Hyde, JAGC, U.S. Navy, Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate General (Admiralty and Maritime Law), Office of the Judge Advocate General, Department of the Navy, 1322 Patterson Ave., SE., Suite 3000, Washington Navy Yard, DC 20374–5066, telephone: 202– 685–5040. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the authority granted in 33 U.S.C. 1605, the Department of the Navy amends 32 CFR Part 706. This amendment provides notice that the Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate General (Admiralty and Maritime Law), under authority delegated by the Secretary of the Navy, has certified that USS NASHVILLE (LPD 13) is a vessel of the Navy which, due to its special construction and purpose, cannot fully comply with the following specific provisions of 72 COLREGS without interfering with its special function as a naval ship: Annex I paragraph 2(a)(i), pertaining to the height of the masthead light; Annex I paragraph 3(a), pertaining to the horizontal distance between the forward and after masthead lights; and Annex I, paragraph 2(g), pertaining to the distance of the sidelights above the hull. The Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate General (Admiralty and Maritime Law) has also certified that the lights involved are located in closest possible compliance with the applicable 72 COLREGS requirements. I PART 62—EXCHANGE VISITOR PROGRAM 1. The authority citation for part 62 is revised to read as follows: I Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(J), 1182, 1184, 1258; 22 U.S.C. 1431–1442, 2451 et seq.; Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998, Pub. L. 105–277, Div. G, 112 Stat. 2681 et seq.; Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 1977, 3 CFR, 1977 Comp. p. 200; E.O. 12048 of March 27, 1978; 3 CFR, 1978 Comp. p. 168; the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) of 1996, Pub. L. 104–208, Div. C, 110 Stat. 3009–546, as amended; Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA PATRIOT ACT), Pub. L. 107–56, Sec. 416, 115 Stat. 354; and the Enhanced Border Security and Visa Entry Reform Act of 2002, Pub. L. 107–173, 116 Stat. 543. 2. Section 62.31 is amended by revising paragraph (p) to read as follows: I § 62.31 Au pairs. jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES This Final Rule will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with section 6 of Executive Order 13132, it is determined that this rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to require consultations or warrant the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement. The regulations implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and activities do not apply to this regulation. Dated: June 5, 2008. Stanley S. Colvin, Director, Office of Exchange Coordination and Designation, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State. [FR Doc. E8–13796 Filed 6–18–08; 8:45 am] Jkt 214001 Department of the Navy, DoD. Final rule. AGENCY: Executive Orders 12372 and 13132 16:32 Jun 18, 2008 Certifications and Exemptions Under the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972 Cultural exchange programs, reporting and recordkeeping requirements. * * * * (p) Repeat Participation. A foreign national who enters the United States as an au pair Exchange Visitor Program participant and who has successfully completed his or her program is eligible to participate again as an au pair participant, provided that he or she has resided outside the United States for at least two years following completion of his or her initial au pair program. VerDate Aug<31>2005 32 CFR Part 706 * BILLING CODE 4710–05–P PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 ACTION: E:\FR\FM\19JNR1.SGM 19JNR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 119 (Thursday, June 19, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 34861-34862]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-13796]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

22 CFR Part 62

RIN 1400-AC48
[Public Notice: 6265]


Exchange Visitor Program--Au Pairs

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Interim Final Rule with request for comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department is hereby revising its regulations regarding Au 
Pairs. The Interim Final Rule revises the section on repeat 
participation to allow qualified au pairs to repeat the program after a 
period of at least two years residency outside the United States 
following the end date of his or her initial program.

DATES: This rule is effective 30 days from July 21, 2008. The 
Department will accept comments from the public up to 30 days from July 
21, 2008.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
     Persons with access to the Internet may view this notice 
and provide comments by going to the regulations.gov Web site at: 
https://www.regulations.gov/index.cfm.
     E-mail: jexchanges@state.gov. You must include the RIN 
(1400-AC48) in the subject line of your message.
     Mail (paper, disk, or CD-ROM submissions): U.S. Department 
of State, Office of Exchange Coordination and Designation, SA-44, 301 
4th Street, SW., Room 734, Washington, DC 20547.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stanley S. Colvin, Director, Office of 
Exchange Coordination and Designation, U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 
301 4th Street, SW., Room 734, Washington, DC 20547; or e-mail at 
jexchanges@state.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 10, 2007, the Department of 
State published a Notice with request for comments to solicit views on 
the age eligibility requirement for au pair participants, an increase 
of the age limitation from 26 to 30, and whether to allow a foreign 
national who previously participated in the au pair program to repeat 
the program. A total of seven comments were received in response to the 
Notice. All seven comments were in favor of increasing the age 
requirement and permitting repeat participation. The au pair program is 
one of five work-based exchange opportunities available through the 
Exchange Visitor Program. These programs are targeted toward young 
adults aged 18-26. At this time, the Department believes the synergies 
of the program are enhanced by retaining its focus on participants in 
this age range.
    On the other hand, as the result of repeat participation, au pair 
sponsors will be able to select from a larger pool of candidates. The 
Department has determined that an au pair who has successfully 
completed the au pair program may repeat program participation provided 
that he or she has resided outside the United States for a period of at 
least two years after the completion of initial participation in the au 
pair program (including the educational component requirement) and is 
within the regulatory age range for eligibility. An au pair who has 
previously participated is likely to be more familiar with the American 
culture (thereby quickly overcoming cultural challenges), is a proven 
successful caretaker, and will be able to build on the skills 
previously acquired.

Regulatory Analysis

Administrative Procedure Act

    The Department has determined that this Final Rule involves a 
foreign affairs function of the United States and is consequently 
exempt from the procedures required by 5 U.S.C. 553 pursuant to 5 
U.S.C. 553(a)(1). Nonetheless, because of its importance to the public, 
the Department elected to solicit comments during a 60-day comment 
period.

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996

    This rule has been found not to be a major rule within the meaning 
of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996.

[[Page 34862]]

Regulatory Flexibility Act/Executive Order 13272: Small Business

    Since this rulemaking is exempt from 5 U.S.C. 553, and no other law 
requires the Department to give notice of proposed rulemaking, this 
rulemaking also is not subject to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 
U.S.C. 601, et seq.) and Executive Order 13272, section 3(b).

Executive Order 12866, as Amended

    The Department of State does not consider this Final Rule to be a 
``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866, as 
amended, Sec.  3(f), Regulatory Planning and Review. In addition, the 
Department is exempt from Executive Order 12866 except to the extent 
that it is promulgating regulations in conjunction with a domestic 
agency that are significant regulatory actions. The Department has 
nevertheless reviewed the Proposed Rule to ensure its consistency with 
the regulatory philosophy and principles set forth in that Executive 
Order.

Executive Order 12988

    The Department has reviewed this Final Rule in light of Sec. Sec.  
3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988 to eliminate ambiguity, 
minimize litigation, establish clear legal standards, and reduce 
burden.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. 1532, generally 
requires agencies to prepare a statement before proposing any rule that 
may result in an annual expenditure of $100 million or more by State, 
local, or tribal governments, or by the private sector. This Final Rule 
will not result in any such expenditure, nor will it significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments.

Executive Orders 12372 and 13132

    This Final Rule will not have substantial direct effects on the 
States, on the relationship between the national government and the 
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the 
various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with section 6 
of Executive Order 13132, it is determined that this rule does not have 
sufficient federalism implications to require consultations or warrant 
the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement. The 
regulations implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding 
intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and activities do 
not apply to this regulation.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    This Interim Final Rule does not impose any new reporting or 
recordkeeping requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35.

List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 62

    Cultural exchange programs, reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements.

0
Accordingly, 22 CFR Part 62 is revised to read as follows:

PART 62--EXCHANGE VISITOR PROGRAM

0
1. The authority citation for part 62 is revised to read as follows:

    Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(J), 1182, 1184, 1258; 22 U.S.C. 
1431-1442, 2451 et seq.; Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring 
Act of 1998, Pub. L. 105-277, Div. G, 112 Stat. 2681 et seq.; 
Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 1977, 3 CFR, 1977 Comp. p. 200; E.O. 
12048 of March 27, 1978; 3 CFR, 1978 Comp. p. 168; the Illegal 
Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) of 
1996, Pub. L. 104-208, Div. C, 110 Stat. 3009-546, as amended; 
Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools 
Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA 
PATRIOT ACT), Pub. L. 107-56, Sec. 416, 115 Stat. 354; and the 
Enhanced Border Security and Visa Entry Reform Act of 2002, Pub. L. 
107-173, 116 Stat. 543.


0
2. Section 62.31 is amended by revising paragraph (p) to read as 
follows:


Sec.  62.31  Au pairs.

* * * * *
    (p) Repeat Participation. A foreign national who enters the United 
States as an au pair Exchange Visitor Program participant and who has 
successfully completed his or her program is eligible to participate 
again as an au pair participant, provided that he or she has resided 
outside the United States for at least two years following completion 
of his or her initial au pair program.

    Dated: June 5, 2008.
Stanley S. Colvin,
Director, Office of Exchange Coordination and Designation, Bureau of 
Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E8-13796 Filed 6-18-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.