Airworthiness Directives; Dassault Model Falcon 2000EX Airplanes and Model Falcon 900EX Airplanes, 34608-34611 [E8-13275]
Download as PDF
34608
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 18, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
area, installation, or assembly to detect
obvious damage, failure, or irregularity. This
level of inspection is made under normally
available lighting conditions such as
daylight, hangar lighting, flashlight, or droplight, and may require removal or opening of
access panels or doors. Stands, ladders, or
platforms may be required to gain proximity
to the area being checked.’’
(g) Prior to further flight after
accomplishment of the requirements in
paragraph (f) of this AD, accomplish the
actions specified in paragraphs (g)(1) and
(g)(2), as applicable, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions in Lockheed
Service Bulletin 093–28–094, dated March 3,
2000; or Revision 1, dated June 23, 2006.
(1) Install sleeving over each fuel level
control switch wiring harness and install the
modified fuel level control switch.
(2) If a conduit with P/N 97590–103 is
installed, replace the conduit with one
having P/N 97590–121, install sleeving over
each fuel level control switch wiring harness,
and install the modified fuel level control
switch.
New Requirements of This AD
New Inspections, Replacement, and
Corrective Actions
(h) Within 60 months after the effective
date of this AD: Do a general visual
inspection of the fuel level control switch,
wiring harness, and wiring harness conduit
for any visible damage, wear or chafing,
broken or missing O-rings, or indications of
electrical arcing; do an inspection to
determine the part number of the wiring
harness conduit; replace any braided
fiberglass sleeving with PVC electrical
sleeving over the wiring harness of the fuel
level control switch; and do all applicable
corrective actions; by accomplishing all of
the applicable actions specified in the
Accomplishment Instructions of Lockheed
Service Bulletin 093–28–094, Revision 1,
dated June 23, 2006. The corrective actions
must be done before further flight after doing
the inspections.
Maintenance Program Revision
(i) Concurrently with accomplishing the
actions specified in paragraph (h) of this AD:
Revise the FAA-approved maintenance
program to incorporate the information
specified in Table 1 of this AD.
TABLE 1.—FUEL SYSTEM LIMITATION FOR FUEL LEVEL CONTROL SWITCH
Task
Airworthiness limitation instruction (ALI).
Repetitive Interval
Applicability
Description
120 months ........................
All airplanes modified in
accordance with Lockheed Service Bulletin
093–28–094, Revision 1,
dated June 23, 2006.
General visual inspection of the fuel level control
switch, wiring harness, and wiring harness conduit
for any visible damage, wear or chafing, broken or
missing O-rings, or indications of electrical arcing, in
accordance with Lockheed Service Bulletin 093–28–
094, Revision 1, dated June 23, 2006.
No Alternative Inspections or Inspection
Intervals
(j) After accomplishing the action specified
in paragraph (i) of this AD, no alternative
inspections or inspection intervals may be
used unless the inspections or intervals are
part of a later revision of Lockheed Service
Bulletin 093–28–094, Revision 1, dated June
23, 2006, that is approved by the Manager,
Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA; or unless the inspections or intervals
are approved as an AMOC in accordance
with the procedures specified in paragraph
(l) of this AD.
No Reporting Requirement
(k) Although Lockheed Service Bulletin
093–28–094, Revision 1, dated June 23, 2006,
specifies notifying Lockheed of any
discrepancies found during the inspection,
this AD does not require that action.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(l)(1) The Manager, Atlanta ACO, FAA, has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD,
if requested in accordance with the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector
(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District
Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(m) You must use Lockheed Service
Bulletin 093–28–094, dated March 3, 2000; or
Lockheed Service Bulletin 093–28–094,
Revision 1, dated June 23, 2006; as
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:10 Jun 17, 2008
Jkt 214001
applicable; to perform the actions that are
required by this AD, unless the AD specifies
otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
Lockheed Service Bulletin 093–28–094,
Revision 1, dated June 23, 2006, in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) On June 1, 2001 (66 FR 21072, April 27,
2001), the Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
Lockheed Service Bulletin 093–28–094,
dated March 3, 2000.
(3) Contact Lockheed Continued
Airworthiness Project Office, Attention:
Airworthiness, 86 South Cobb Drive,
Marietta, Georgia 30063–0567, for a copy of
this service information. You may review
copies at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington; or at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go
to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/
cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 5,
2008.
Michael J. Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–13277 Filed 6–17–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2008–0364; Directorate
Identifier 2006–NM–281–AD; Amendment
39–15562; AD 2008–12–18]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Dassault
Model Falcon 2000EX Airplanes and
Model Falcon 900EX Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results
from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
During a flight test performed on an EASy
aircraft, subsequently to an air data probe
failure, the crew realized that the Flight path
vectors and the Vertical speeds that were
displayed on pilot’s and co-pilot’s PDU
(primary display unit) were identically
wrong.
A review of the EASy architecture reveals
that * * * One single ADS (air data system)
unflagged air data error may lead to the
E:\FR\FM\18JNR1.SGM
18JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 18, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
computation and display on both pilot’s and
co-pilot’s display units of unnoticed and
misleading flight information.
At take-off or during go-around this
situation might considerably reduce flight
safety.
We are issuing this AD to require
actions to correct the unsafe condition
on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective July
23, 2008.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in this AD
as of July 23, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom
Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98057–3356; telephone (425) 227–1137;
fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would
apply to the specified products. That
NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on March 31, 2008 (73 FR
16787). That NPRM proposed to correct
an unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
During a flight test performed on an EASy
aircraft, subsequently to an air data probe
failure, the crew realized that the Flight path
vectors and the Vertical speeds that were
displayed on pilot’s and co-pilot’s PDU
(primary display unit) were identically
wrong.
A review of the EASy architecture reveals
that the current wiring of Air Data System
(ADS) and IRS (inertial reference system)
units is not compliant with the certified
safety objectives. All IRS primary inputs are
wired to the same General Purpose (GP) Bus
and thus basic requirements for ADS
segregation are not met. One single ADS
unflagged air data error may lead to the
computation and display on both pilot’s and
co-pilot’s display units of unnoticed and
misleading flight information.
At take-off or during go-around this
situation might considerably reduce flight
safety.
This AD mandates a wiring modification of
IRS [no.] 2 and a test of General Purpose bus
IRS entry per application of SB–F2000EX–89
on Falcon 2000EX EASy and per application
of SB–F900EX–274 on Falcon 900EX EASy.
Furthermore in order to maintain ADS
parameter segregation against possible
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:10 Jun 17, 2008
Jkt 214001
failures, this AD also requires F2000EX EASy
and F900EX EASy operators to comply with
the modifications made to the respective
Chapter 5.40 of the Aircraft Maintenance
Manuals that contain an additional periodic
functional test of the IRS GP Bus I/O (input/
output).
Dispatch conditions under MMEL (master
minimum equipment list) in case of an IRS2
failure are modified after implementation of
the wiring change.
The corrective actions involve
checking the integrity of the GP bus and
IRS2, and repairing them as applicable.
You may obtain further information by
examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
received no comments on the NPRM or
on the determination of the cost to the
public.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD
as proposed.
Differences Between This AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have required different
actions in this AD from those in the
MCAI in order to follow our FAA
policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect
about 62 products of U.S. registry. We
also estimate that it will take about 3
work-hours per product to comply with
the basic requirements of this AD. The
average labor rate is $80 per work-hour.
Required parts will cost a negligible
amount per product. Where the service
information lists required parts costs
that are covered under warranty, we
have assumed that there will be no
charge for these parts. As we do not
control warranty coverage for affected
parties, some parties may incur costs
higher than estimated here. Based on
these figures, we estimate the cost of
this AD to the U.S. operators to be
$14,880, or $240 per product.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
34609
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this AD:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains the NPRM, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone
(800) 647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
E:\FR\FM\18JNR1.SGM
18JNR1
34610
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 18, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
I
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
I
2008–12–18 Dassault Aviation:
Amendment 39–15562. Docket No.
FAA–2008–0364; Directorate Identifier
2006–NM–281–AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD)
becomes effective July 23, 2008.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Dassault Model
Falcon 2000EX airplanes, serial number (S/
N) 6, and S/N 28 and subsequent; and Model
Falcon 900EX airplanes, S/N 97, and S/N 120
and subsequent; certificated in any category.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 34: Navigation.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
During a flight test performed on an EASy
aircraft, subsequently to an air data probe
failure, the crew realized that the Flight path
vectors and the Vertical speeds that were
displayed on pilot’s and co-pilot’s PDU
(primary display unit) were identically
wrong.
A review of the EASy architecture reveals
that the current wiring of Air Data System
(ADS) and IRS (inertial reference system)
units is not compliant with the certified
safety objectives. All IRS primary inputs are
wired to the same General Purpose (GP) Bus
and thus basic requirements for ADS
segregation are not met. One single ADS
unflagged air data error may lead to the
computation and display on both pilot’s and
co-pilot’s display units of unnoticed and
misleading flight information.
At take-off or during go-around this
situation might considerably reduce flight
safety.
This AD mandates a wiring modification of
IRS [no.] 2 and a test of General Purpose bus
IRS entry per application of SB–F2000EX–89
on Falcon 2000EX EASy and per application
of SB–F900EX–274 on Falcon 900EX EASy.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:10 Jun 17, 2008
Jkt 214001
Furthermore in order to maintain ADS
parameter segregation against possible
failures, this AD also requires F2000EX EASy
and F900EX EASy operators to comply with
the modifications made to the respective
Chapter 5.40 of the Aircraft Maintenance
Manuals that contain an additional periodic
functional test of the IRS GP Bus I/O (input/
output).
Dispatch conditions under MMEL (master
minimum equipment list) in case of an IRS2
failure are modified after implementation of
the wiring change.
The corrective actions involve checking the
integrity of the GP bus and IRS2, and
repairing them as applicable.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following
actions.
(1) For Model Falcon 2000EX airplanes
without Dassault Modification M2758 and
Model Falcon 900EX airplanes without
Dassault Modification M5143 in the
applicability range: Within 3 months after the
effective date of this AD, do the IRS2 wiring
modification and test the GP (general
purpose) bus IRS entry. Do all actions in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Dassault Service Bulletin
F2000EX–89, dated March 17, 2006; or
Dassault Service Bulletin F900EX–274, dated
March 17, 2006; as applicable. Repeat the test
at intervals not to exceed 5,000 flight hours.
If the GP bus IRS entry fails any test, before
further flight, do all applicable corrective
actions in accordance with the procedures in
Section 34–209, dated March 2007, of the
Dassault Falcon 900EX EASy/900DX
Maintenance Manual; or Section 34–209,
dated May 2007, of the Dassault Falcon
2000EX EASy Maintenance Manual; as
applicable.
(2) For Model Falcon 2000EX airplanes
with Dassault Modification M2758 and
Model Falcon 900EX airplanes with Dassault
Modification M5143 in the applicability
range: Within 5,000 flight hours after the date
of issuance of the original French standard
airworthiness certificate or the date of
issuance of the original French export
certificate of airworthiness, or within 3
months after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later, do a test of the GP
bus IRS entry in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Dassault
Service Bulletin F2000EX–89, dated March
17, 2006; or Dassault Service Bulletin
F900EX–274, dated March 17, 2006; as
applicable. Repeat the test at intervals not to
exceed 5,000 flight hours. If the GP bus IRS
entry fails any test, before further flight, do
the corrective actions in accordance with the
procedures in Section 34–209, dated March
2007, of the Dassault Falcon 900EX EASy/
900DX Maintenance Manual; or Section 34–
209, dated May 2007, of the Dassault Falcon
2000EX EASy Maintenance Manual; as
applicable.
FAA AD Differences
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/
or service information as follows:
(1) Where the MCAI specifies to do a test
of the GP bus IRS entry in accordance with
Chapter 5.40 of the applicable Dassault
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Maintenance Manual and does not specify a
corrective action, we require those corrective
actions to be done in accordance with
Section 34–209, dated March 2007, of the
Dassault Falcon 900EX EASy/900DX
Maintenance Manual; or Section 34–209,
dated May 2007, of the Dassault Falcon
2000EX EASy Maintenance Manual; as
applicable.
(2) The MCAI specified to revise the
applicable Dassault MMEL by incorporating
Dassault Temporary Change 4, dated June 15,
2006, to the Dassault Falcon 2000EX EASy
MMEL (for Model F2000EX EASy airplanes);
and Dassault Temporary Change 3, dated
June 15, 2006, to the Dassault Falcon 900EX
EASy MMEL (for Model F900EX EASy
airplanes); as applicable. However, the FAAapproved MMEL (which is required to be
used by operators) has been revised to
include the information specified in the
Dassault temporary changes. Therefore, we
have not included a requirement for this
revision in this AD.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Tom Rodriguez,
Aerospace Engineer, International Branch,
ANM–116, FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425)
227–1137; fax (425) 227–1149. Before using
any approved AMOC on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify your
appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the
FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO),
or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act,
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
has approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) Airworthiness
Directive 2006–0157, dated June 7, 2006;
Section 34–209, dated March 2007, of the
Dassault Falcon 900EX EASY/900DX
Maintenance Manual; Section 34–209, dated
May 2007, of the Dassault Falcon 2000EX
EASy Maintenance Manual; and Dassault
Service Bulletins F2000EX–89 and F900EX–
274, both dated March 17, 2006; for related
information.
E:\FR\FM\18JNR1.SGM
18JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 18, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use the service information
specified in Table 1 of this AD to do the
actions required by this AD, as applicable,
unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
this service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Dassault Falcon Jet, P.O. Box
2000, South Hackensack, New Jersey 07606.
(3) You may review copies at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
(202) 741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
TABLE 1.—MATERIAL INCORPORATED
BY REFERENCE
Service information
Dassault Falcon 2000EX
EASy Maintenance
Manual, Section 34–
209.
Dassault Falcon 900EX
EASY/900DX Maintenance Manual, Section
34–209.
Dassault Service Bulletin
F2000EX–89.
Dassault Service Bulletin
F900EX–274.
Date
May 2007.
March 2007.
March 17, 2006.
March 17, 2006.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 5,
2008.
Michael J. Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–13275 Filed 6–17–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2008–0393 Directorate
Identifier 2008–CE–011–AD; Amendment
39–15533; AD 2008–11–11]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Viking Air
Limited Model DHC–2 Series Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are superseding an
existing airworthiness directive (AD) for
the products listed above. This AD
results from mandatory continuing
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:10 Jun 17, 2008
Jkt 214001
airworthiness information (MCAI)
issued by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
Cracks have been reported in the front spar
center web of the tailplane at the pick-up
bracket and at lightening holes. If not
detected early and repaired, these cracks may
lead to failure of the tailplane.
We are issuing this AD to require
actions to correct the unsafe condition
on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective July
23, 2008.
On July 23, 2008, the Director of the
Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of Viking
DHC–2 Beaver Service Bulletin 2/47,
Revision E, dated January 23, 2007,
listed in this AD.
As of December 15, 1992 (57 FR
53254, November 9, 1992), the Director
of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of
deHavilland Technical News Sheet B55,
dated August 1, 1952; and Bombardier
de Havilland DHC–2 (Beaver) Service
Bulletin 2/47 Revision C, revised
September 4, 1992, listed in this AD.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the
Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pong Lee, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
New York Certification Office, 1600
Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury,
New York 11590; telephone: (516) 228–
7324; fax: (516) 794–5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would
apply to the specified products. That
NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on April 2, 2008 (73 FR 17937),
and proposed to supersede AD 92–24–
02, Amendment 39–8407 (57 FR 53254,
November 9, 1992). That NPRM
proposed to correct an unsafe condition
for the specified products. The MCAI
states:
Cracks have been reported in the front spar
center web of the tailplane at the pick-up
bracket and at lightening holes. If not
detected early and repaired, these cracks may
lead to failure of the tailplane. This revision
is issued to reflect the new requirement to
inspect the tailplane front spar web behind
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
34611
the pick-up brackets using fluorescent
penetrant inspection (FPI) instead of the
visual inspection method used previously.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
received no comments on the NPRM or
on the determination of the cost to the
public.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD
as proposed.
Differences Between This AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have required different
actions in this AD from those in the
MCAI in order to follow FAA policies.
Any such differences are highlighted in
a NOTE within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we
estimate that this AD will affect 396
products of U.S. registry. We also
estimate that it will take about 10 workhours per product to comply with basic
requirements of this AD. The average
labor rate is $80 per work-hour.
Based on these figures, we estimate
the cost of this AD to the U.S. operators
to be $316,800 or $800 per product.
In addition, we estimate that any
necessary follow-on actions would take
about 48 work-hours and require parts
costing $1,854, for a cost of $5,694 per
product. We have no way of
determining the number of products
that may need these actions.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
E:\FR\FM\18JNR1.SGM
18JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 118 (Wednesday, June 18, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 34608-34611]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-13275]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2008-0364; Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-281-AD;
Amendment 39-15562; AD 2008-12-18]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Dassault Model Falcon 2000EX Airplanes
and Model Falcon 900EX Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
During a flight test performed on an EASy aircraft, subsequently
to an air data probe failure, the crew realized that the Flight path
vectors and the Vertical speeds that were displayed on pilot's and
co-pilot's PDU (primary display unit) were identically wrong.
A review of the EASy architecture reveals that * * * One single
ADS (air data system) unflagged air data error may lead to the
[[Page 34609]]
computation and display on both pilot's and co-pilot's display units
of unnoticed and misleading flight information.
At take-off or during go-around this situation might
considerably reduce flight safety.
We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective July 23, 2008.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of July 23,
2008.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1137; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on March 31, 2008 (73
FR 16787). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:
During a flight test performed on an EASy aircraft, subsequently
to an air data probe failure, the crew realized that the Flight path
vectors and the Vertical speeds that were displayed on pilot's and
co-pilot's PDU (primary display unit) were identically wrong.
A review of the EASy architecture reveals that the current
wiring of Air Data System (ADS) and IRS (inertial reference system)
units is not compliant with the certified safety objectives. All IRS
primary inputs are wired to the same General Purpose (GP) Bus and
thus basic requirements for ADS segregation are not met. One single
ADS unflagged air data error may lead to the computation and display
on both pilot's and co-pilot's display units of unnoticed and
misleading flight information.
At take-off or during go-around this situation might
considerably reduce flight safety.
This AD mandates a wiring modification of IRS [no.] 2 and a test
of General Purpose bus IRS entry per application of SB-F2000EX-89 on
Falcon 2000EX EASy and per application of SB-F900EX-274 on Falcon
900EX EASy.
Furthermore in order to maintain ADS parameter segregation
against possible failures, this AD also requires F2000EX EASy and
F900EX EASy operators to comply with the modifications made to the
respective Chapter 5.40 of the Aircraft Maintenance Manuals that
contain an additional periodic functional test of the IRS GP Bus I/O
(input/output).
Dispatch conditions under MMEL (master minimum equipment list)
in case of an IRS2 failure are modified after implementation of the
wiring change.
The corrective actions involve checking the integrity of the GP bus
and IRS2, and repairing them as applicable. You may obtain further
information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of
the cost to the public.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow our FAA policies. Any such differences
are highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect about 62 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it will take about 3 work-hours per
product to comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average
labor rate is $80 per work-hour. Required parts will cost a negligible
amount per product. Where the service information lists required parts
costs that are covered under warranty, we have assumed that there will
be no charge for these parts. As we do not control warranty coverage
for affected parties, some parties may incur costs higher than
estimated here. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD
to the U.S. operators to be $14,880, or $240 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
[[Page 34610]]
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2008-12-18 Dassault Aviation: Amendment 39-15562. Docket No. FAA-
2008-0364; Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-281-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective July 23,
2008.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Dassault Model Falcon 2000EX airplanes,
serial number (S/N) 6, and S/N 28 and subsequent; and Model Falcon
900EX airplanes, S/N 97, and S/N 120 and subsequent; certificated in
any category.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 34:
Navigation.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
During a flight test performed on an EASy aircraft, subsequently
to an air data probe failure, the crew realized that the Flight path
vectors and the Vertical speeds that were displayed on pilot's and
co-pilot's PDU (primary display unit) were identically wrong.
A review of the EASy architecture reveals that the current
wiring of Air Data System (ADS) and IRS (inertial reference system)
units is not compliant with the certified safety objectives. All IRS
primary inputs are wired to the same General Purpose (GP) Bus and
thus basic requirements for ADS segregation are not met. One single
ADS unflagged air data error may lead to the computation and display
on both pilot's and co-pilot's display units of unnoticed and
misleading flight information.
At take-off or during go-around this situation might
considerably reduce flight safety.
This AD mandates a wiring modification of IRS [no.] 2 and a test
of General Purpose bus IRS entry per application of SB-F2000EX-89 on
Falcon 2000EX EASy and per application of SB-F900EX-274 on Falcon
900EX EASy.
Furthermore in order to maintain ADS parameter segregation
against possible failures, this AD also requires F2000EX EASy and
F900EX EASy operators to comply with the modifications made to the
respective Chapter 5.40 of the Aircraft Maintenance Manuals that
contain an additional periodic functional test of the IRS GP Bus I/O
(input/output).
Dispatch conditions under MMEL (master minimum equipment list)
in case of an IRS2 failure are modified after implementation of the
wiring change.
The corrective actions involve checking the integrity of the GP bus
and IRS2, and repairing them as applicable.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following actions.
(1) For Model Falcon 2000EX airplanes without Dassault
Modification M2758 and Model Falcon 900EX airplanes without Dassault
Modification M5143 in the applicability range: Within 3 months after
the effective date of this AD, do the IRS2 wiring modification and
test the GP (general purpose) bus IRS entry. Do all actions in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Dassault Service
Bulletin F2000EX-89, dated March 17, 2006; or Dassault Service
Bulletin F900EX-274, dated March 17, 2006; as applicable. Repeat the
test at intervals not to exceed 5,000 flight hours. If the GP bus
IRS entry fails any test, before further flight, do all applicable
corrective actions in accordance with the procedures in Section 34-
209, dated March 2007, of the Dassault Falcon 900EX EASy/900DX
Maintenance Manual; or Section 34-209, dated May 2007, of the
Dassault Falcon 2000EX EASy Maintenance Manual; as applicable.
(2) For Model Falcon 2000EX airplanes with Dassault Modification
M2758 and Model Falcon 900EX airplanes with Dassault Modification
M5143 in the applicability range: Within 5,000 flight hours after
the date of issuance of the original French standard airworthiness
certificate or the date of issuance of the original French export
certificate of airworthiness, or within 3 months after the effective
date of this AD, whichever occurs later, do a test of the GP bus IRS
entry in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Dassault
Service Bulletin F2000EX-89, dated March 17, 2006; or Dassault
Service Bulletin F900EX-274, dated March 17, 2006; as applicable.
Repeat the test at intervals not to exceed 5,000 flight hours. If
the GP bus IRS entry fails any test, before further flight, do the
corrective actions in accordance with the procedures in Section 34-
209, dated March 2007, of the Dassault Falcon 900EX EASy/900DX
Maintenance Manual; or Section 34-209, dated May 2007, of the
Dassault Falcon 2000EX EASy Maintenance Manual; as applicable.
FAA AD Differences
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/ or service information
as follows:
(1) Where the MCAI specifies to do a test of the GP bus IRS
entry in accordance with Chapter 5.40 of the applicable Dassault
Maintenance Manual and does not specify a corrective action, we
require those corrective actions to be done in accordance with
Section 34-209, dated March 2007, of the Dassault Falcon 900EX EASy/
900DX Maintenance Manual; or Section 34-209, dated May 2007, of the
Dassault Falcon 2000EX EASy Maintenance Manual; as applicable.
(2) The MCAI specified to revise the applicable Dassault MMEL by
incorporating Dassault Temporary Change 4, dated June 15, 2006, to
the Dassault Falcon 2000EX EASy MMEL (for Model F2000EX EASy
airplanes); and Dassault Temporary Change 3, dated June 15, 2006, to
the Dassault Falcon 900EX EASy MMEL (for Model F900EX EASy
airplanes); as applicable. However, the FAA-approved MMEL (which is
required to be used by operators) has been revised to include the
information specified in the Dassault temporary changes. Therefore,
we have not included a requirement for this revision in this AD.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Tom
Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-1137; fax (425) 227-1149.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
Airworthiness Directive 2006-0157, dated June 7, 2006; Section 34-
209, dated March 2007, of the Dassault Falcon 900EX EASY/900DX
Maintenance Manual; Section 34-209, dated May 2007, of the Dassault
Falcon 2000EX EASy Maintenance Manual; and Dassault Service
Bulletins F2000EX-89 and F900EX-274, both dated March 17, 2006; for
related information.
[[Page 34611]]
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use the service information specified in Table 1 of
this AD to do the actions required by this AD, as applicable, unless
the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Dassault Falcon Jet, P.O. Box 2000, South Hackensack, New Jersey
07606.
(3) You may review copies at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information
on the availability of this material at NARA, call (202) 741-6030,
or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-
locations.html.
Table 1.--Material Incorporated by Reference
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Service information Date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dassault Falcon 2000EX EASy Maintenance May 2007.
Manual, Section 34-209.
Dassault Falcon 900EX EASY/900DX March 2007.
Maintenance Manual, Section 34-209.
Dassault Service Bulletin F2000EX-89... March 17, 2006.
Dassault Service Bulletin F900EX-274... March 17, 2006.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 5, 2008.
Michael J. Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-13275 Filed 6-17-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P