Notice of Intent To Amend the Three Rivers Resource Management Plan and Conduct Public Scoping, 34314-34315 [E8-13582]
Download as PDF
34314
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 117 / Tuesday, June 17, 2008 / Notices
personal identifying information, may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Authority: The authority for this action is
section 4(f) of the Endangered Species Act,
16 U.S.C. 1533(f).
Dated: April 24, 2008.
Cynthia K. Dohner,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. E8–13580 Filed 6–16–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[OR–025–1110–MR–SSSS; 8–0118]
Notice of Intent To Amend the Three
Rivers Resource Management Plan
and Conduct Public Scoping
Bureau of Land Management,
U.S. Department of the Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Intent.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 and the Federal Land Policy and
Management Act of 1976, the Bureau of
Land Management (BLM) Burns District
in Burns, Oregon, intends to amend the
Three Rivers Resource Management
Plan (RMP) with an associated
Environmental Assessment (EA) that
also analyzes effects of undertaking the
Greater Sage-grouse Habitat
Improvement Project (GSHIP) located in
Harney County, Oregon. The objective
of the proposal is to improve sagegrouse habitat and reestablish once open
sagebrush habitats encroached upon by
western juniper. The BLM also intends
to consider allowance for harvest of
downed western juniper trees south of
U.S. Highway 20 and west of Oregon
State Highway 205 for fuel wood, posts
and poles, and for commercial harvest
of juniper boughs for use in holiday
decorating. Allowance for harvest of
downed juniper trees and juniper
boughs would amend the Three Rivers
RMP. By this notice, the BLM is
announcing the beginning of the public
scoping process.
DATES: Scoping comments will be
accepted for 30 days following
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register. Public notice will be provided
when the Draft RMP Amendment and
associated EA become available later
this year (2008). Written comments will
also be accepted throughout the
planning process at the address below.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:10 Jun 16, 2008
Jkt 214001
You may submit comments
to GSHIP/RMP Amendment Lead, BLM
Burns District Office, 28910 Highway 20
West, Hines, Oregon 97738; fax to (541)
573–4411; or e-mail to
Joan_Suther@or.blm.gov. Comments,
including the names and addresses of
respondents, will be available for public
review at the Burns District Office
during regular business hours 7:45 a.m.
to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except holidays, and may be published
as part of the Decision. Before including
your address, phone number, e-mail
address, or other personal identifying
information in your comment, you
should be aware that your entire
comment—including your personal
identifying information—may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask us in your comment to
withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so. Anonymous comments will not
be considered. All submissions from
organizations and businesses, and from
individuals identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses, will be
available for public inspection in their
entirety.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
GSHIP/RMP Amendment Project Lead,
BLM Burns District Office, 28910
Highway 20 West, Hines, Oregon 97738;
(541) 573–4503; Fax (541) 573–4411; email Joan_Suther@blm.gov; or visit the
Burns District Web site at https://
www.blm.gov/or/districts/burns/plans/
index.php.
The
GSHIP project was developed from
management objectives identified in the
Three Rivers RMP. The Three Rivers
Plan directs BLM to: ‘‘* * * restore,
maintain, or enhance the diversity of
plant communities and wildlife habitat
in abundances and distributions which
prevent the loss of specific native plant
community types or indigenous wildlife
species habitat within the Resource
Area’’ (WL–7.2); ‘‘* * * maintain,
restore or enhance the habitat of
candidate, State listed and other
sensitive species to maintain the
populations at a level which will avoid
endangering the species and the need to
list the species by either State or Federal
governments’’ (SSS–2); and ‘‘* * *
maintain, restore or enhance the
diversity of plant communities and
plant species in abundances and
distributions, which prevent the loss of
specific native plant community types
or indigenous plant species within the
Resource Area’’ (V–1).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
In addition to direction from the
Three Rivers RMP, managers are
directed to meet management objectives
and guidelines set forth in the Greater
Sage-grouse and Sagebrush-Steppe
Ecosystems Management Guidelines
(2001). These management objectives
and guidelines include: ‘‘* * *
maintain and enhance existing sagegrouse habitats, use mechanical
treatment or prescribed fire to remove
juniper where it has invaded into * * *
sites with mountain big sagebrush and/
or low sagebrush; and vegetation
manipulations should benefit the longterm health of sage-grouse habitat.’’
Greater sage-grouse have been
declining across much of their native
range for decades due to habitat
modification and fragmentation.
Changes to habitat and habitat
fragmentation have come from both
natural and human causes. Human
caused habitat change and
fragmentation have resulted from urban
sprawl, rangeland modification, and
infrastructure development (i.e., power
lines, highways, etc.). Natural habitat
changes have been induced through fire,
climate change, and succession;
however, even natural causes have been
influenced by man to some degree. One
cause of sage-grouse habitat loss in the
Three Rivers Resource Area is due to
western juniper encroachment into what
were once sagebrush dominated
landscapes.
Historic grazing practices (which
removed fine herbaceous fuels) and fire
suppression activities at the turn of the
century reduced influence of the fire
regime in the project area. Fire was the
principal factor controlling conifer
encroachment into shrub-grassland
communities in the Intermountain West
prior to Euro-American immigration
(110 to 130 years ago) (West 1999;
Miller and Tausch 2001). As frequency
and size of fires across the landscape
lessened, juniper expanded into shrubgrassland communities with an overall
loss in ecosystem function and a
dramatic alteration in historic
biodiversity, hydrologic cycles, fauna,
and nutrient cycling (Bates et al. 1998).
Recent inventories of western juniper
in eastern Oregon indicate juniper
woodlands and savannahs cover an area
of over five million acres (Gedney et al.
1999). Comparisons with data generated
by earlier inventories suggest the area
supporting western juniper has
increased fivefold since 1936. Harney
County is one of four counties in Oregon
that contain more than one-half million
acres of western juniper woodlands.
Sage-grouse are sensitive to juniper
encroachment and have been shown to
avoid juniper communities for nesting
E:\FR\FM\17JNN1.SGM
17JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 117 / Tuesday, June 17, 2008 / Notices
and winter habitat (Miller et al. 2005).
Continued expansion of juniper will
lead to further losses of suitable sagegrouse habitat. While the problem of
juniper encroachment is prevalent
across the Resource Area, the Glass
Butte/Rye Grass area was selected to
expand upon a small-scale project
completed there in 2006.
Initial scoping (March 1 to April 1,
2007) for the GSHIP expressed interest
from the public in harvesting downed
juniper for fuel wood, posts and poles.
Additional preliminary issues and
management concerns identified by
BLM personnel and the public include
management of Air Quality, Water
Quality, Migratory Birds, Special Status
Species fauna and flora, Noxious
Weeds, Cultural Heritage and Hazardous
Materials.
An interdisciplinary approach will be
used to develop the EA in order to
consider the variety of resource issues
and concerns identified. Disciplines
involved in the project will include (but
not be limited to) those with expertise
in management of the aforementioned
resources.
1920 (30 U.S.C. 188). We are proposing
to reinstate the lease, effective the date
of termination subject to:
• The original terms and conditions
of the lease;
• The increased rental of $10 per
acre;
• The increased royalty of 162⁄3
percent or 4 percentages above the
existing competitive royalty rate; and
• The $163 cost of publishing this
Notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karen L. Johnson, Chief, Fluids
Adjudication Section, BLM Montana
State Office, 5001 Southgate Drive,
Billings, Montana 59101–4669, 406–
896–5098.
Dated: June 11, 2008.
Dana R. Shuford,
Burns District Manager.
[FR Doc. E8–13582 Filed 6–16–08; 8:45 am]
Notice of Intent To Repatriate Cultural
Items: The Cleveland Museum of
Natural History, Cleveland, OH
BILLING CODE 4310–33–P
ACTION:
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[MT–922–08–1310–FI–P; NDM 95212]
Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of
Terminated Oil and Gas Lease NDM
95212
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Per 30 U.S.C. 188(d),
Marathon Oil Company timely filed a
petition for reinstatement of oil and gas
lease NDM 95212, Mountrail County,
North Dakota. The lessee paid the
required rental accruing from the date of
termination.
No leases were issued that affect these
lands. The lessee agrees to new lease
terms for rentals and royalties of $10 per
acre and 162⁄3 percent or 4 percentages
above the existing competitive royalty
rate. The lessee paid the $500
administration fee for the reinstatement
of the lease and $163 cost for publishing
this Notice.
The lessee met the requirements for
reinstatement of the lease per Sec. 31(d)
and (e) of the Mineral Leasing Act of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:10 Jun 16, 2008
Jkt 214001
Dated: June 11, 2008.
Karen L. Johnson,
Chief, Fluids Adjudication Section.
[FR Doc. E8–13591 Filed 6–16–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–$$–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is here given in accordance
with the Native American Graves
Protection and Repatriation Act
(NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. 3005, of the intent
to repatriate cultural items in the
possession of The Cleveland Museum of
Natural History, Cleveland, OH, that
meet the definition of ‘‘unassociated
funerary object’’ and ‘‘sacred object’’
under 25 U.S.C. 3001.
This notice is published as part of the
National Park Service’s administrative
responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25
U.S.C. 3003 (d)(3). The determinations
in this notice are the sole responsibility
of the museum, institution, or Federal
agency that has control of the cultural
items. The National Park Service is not
responsible for the determinations in
this notice.
In 1956, cultural items were acquired
by The Cleveland Museum of Natural
History from the Logan Museum, Beloit
College, Beloit, WI. The two cultural
items are one ceremonial wood bowl
(CMNH 12888/CMNH 19888) and one
silver brooch (CMNH 08169).
Representatives of the Little Traverse
Bay Bands of Odawa Indians, Michigan
attributed the cultural items as Ottawa/
Odawa.
The bowl is well-made with a carved
rim and knobs. The locality and date for
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
34315
the bowl are recorded as ‘‘Michigan,
Emmet County, early 1900’s.’’ In Odawa
spiritual practices, ceremonial bowls
have a wide range of use and are
utilized in many different ceremonial
activities. It is believed that manidok
(spirits) reside in each individual bowl
and are a part of the community. It is
the Tribe’s continued responsibility to
take care of these bowls and use them
in ceremonies for sacred reasons, as
such Traditional Religious leaders of the
Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa
Indians, Michigan need to use these
bowls in ceremonies for the Tribe.
The one silver brooch (CMNH 08169)
is made from German silver in the shape
of a disk with punched designs of
circles, stars, and ellipses. The locality
and date for the brooch are listed as
‘‘Michigan, Emmet County, late 1800’s.’’
Multiple archeological sites that are
Native American burial sites or
cemeteries in Michigan from the
Historic Period contain an array of
European trade goods, such as knives,
glass beads and silver brooches (Halsey,
286). It is believed that the silver brooch
in the possession of museum came from
an Odawa grave based on similar objects
found in other Odawa graves from
Michigan. In addition, it is believed that
the brooch is a grave item because it has
been recorded as a Native American
item and not just simply a piece of
silver since the designation of such
simple items to be of Native origin
usually originates because it came from
a Native American burial.
Officials of The Cleveland Museum of
Natural History have determined that,
pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (3)(B), the
one cultural item described above is
reasonably believed to have been placed
with or near individual human remains
at the time of death or later as part of
the death rite or ceremony and is
believed, by a preponderance of the
evidence, to have been removed from a
specific burial site of a Native American
individual. Officials of The Cleveland
Museum of Natural History also have
determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C.
3001 (3)(C), the one cultural item
described above is a specific ceremonial
object needed by traditional Native
American religious leaders for the
practice of traditional Native American
religions by their present–day
adherents. Lastly, officials of The
Cleveland Museum of Natural History
have determined that, pursuant to 25
U.S.C. 3001 (2), there is a relationship
of shared group identity that can be
reasonably traced between the
unassociated funerary object and the
sacred object and the Little Traverse Bay
Bands of Odawa Indians, Michigan.
E:\FR\FM\17JNN1.SGM
17JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 117 (Tuesday, June 17, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34314-34315]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-13582]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[OR-025-1110-MR-SSSS; 8-0118]
Notice of Intent To Amend the Three Rivers Resource Management
Plan and Conduct Public Scoping
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Department of the Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, the Bureau
of Land Management (BLM) Burns District in Burns, Oregon, intends to
amend the Three Rivers Resource Management Plan (RMP) with an
associated Environmental Assessment (EA) that also analyzes effects of
undertaking the Greater Sage-grouse Habitat Improvement Project (GSHIP)
located in Harney County, Oregon. The objective of the proposal is to
improve sage-grouse habitat and reestablish once open sagebrush
habitats encroached upon by western juniper. The BLM also intends to
consider allowance for harvest of downed western juniper trees south of
U.S. Highway 20 and west of Oregon State Highway 205 for fuel wood,
posts and poles, and for commercial harvest of juniper boughs for use
in holiday decorating. Allowance for harvest of downed juniper trees
and juniper boughs would amend the Three Rivers RMP. By this notice,
the BLM is announcing the beginning of the public scoping process.
DATES: Scoping comments will be accepted for 30 days following
publication of this notice in the Federal Register. Public notice will
be provided when the Draft RMP Amendment and associated EA become
available later this year (2008). Written comments will also be
accepted throughout the planning process at the address below.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments to GSHIP/RMP Amendment Lead, BLM
Burns District Office, 28910 Highway 20 West, Hines, Oregon 97738; fax
to (541) 573-4411; or e-mail to Joan_Suther@or.blm.gov. Comments,
including the names and addresses of respondents, will be available for
public review at the Burns District Office during regular business
hours 7:45 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except holidays,
and may be published as part of the Decision. Before including your
address, phone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying
information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire
comment--including your personal identifying information--may be made
publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to
withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Anonymous comments will
not be considered. All submissions from organizations and businesses,
and from individuals identifying themselves as representatives or
officials of organizations or businesses, will be available for public
inspection in their entirety.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: GSHIP/RMP Amendment Project Lead, BLM
Burns District Office, 28910 Highway 20 West, Hines, Oregon 97738;
(541) 573-4503; Fax (541) 573-4411; e-mail Joan_Suther@blm.gov; or
visit the Burns District Web site at https://www.blm.gov/or/districts/
burns/plans/index.php.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The GSHIP project was developed from
management objectives identified in the Three Rivers RMP. The Three
Rivers Plan directs BLM to: ``* * * restore, maintain, or enhance the
diversity of plant communities and wildlife habitat in abundances and
distributions which prevent the loss of specific native plant community
types or indigenous wildlife species habitat within the Resource Area''
(WL-7.2); ``* * * maintain, restore or enhance the habitat of
candidate, State listed and other sensitive species to maintain the
populations at a level which will avoid endangering the species and the
need to list the species by either State or Federal governments'' (SSS-
2); and ``* * * maintain, restore or enhance the diversity of plant
communities and plant species in abundances and distributions, which
prevent the loss of specific native plant community types or indigenous
plant species within the Resource Area'' (V-1).
In addition to direction from the Three Rivers RMP, managers are
directed to meet management objectives and guidelines set forth in the
Greater Sage-grouse and Sagebrush-Steppe Ecosystems Management
Guidelines (2001). These management objectives and guidelines include:
``* * * maintain and enhance existing sage-grouse habitats, use
mechanical treatment or prescribed fire to remove juniper where it has
invaded into * * * sites with mountain big sagebrush and/or low
sagebrush; and vegetation manipulations should benefit the long-term
health of sage-grouse habitat.''
Greater sage-grouse have been declining across much of their native
range for decades due to habitat modification and fragmentation.
Changes to habitat and habitat fragmentation have come from both
natural and human causes. Human caused habitat change and fragmentation
have resulted from urban sprawl, rangeland modification, and
infrastructure development (i.e., power lines, highways, etc.). Natural
habitat changes have been induced through fire, climate change, and
succession; however, even natural causes have been influenced by man to
some degree. One cause of sage-grouse habitat loss in the Three Rivers
Resource Area is due to western juniper encroachment into what were
once sagebrush dominated landscapes.
Historic grazing practices (which removed fine herbaceous fuels)
and fire suppression activities at the turn of the century reduced
influence of the fire regime in the project area. Fire was the
principal factor controlling conifer encroachment into shrub-grassland
communities in the Intermountain West prior to Euro-American
immigration (110 to 130 years ago) (West 1999; Miller and Tausch 2001).
As frequency and size of fires across the landscape lessened, juniper
expanded into shrub-grassland communities with an overall loss in
ecosystem function and a dramatic alteration in historic biodiversity,
hydrologic cycles, fauna, and nutrient cycling (Bates et al. 1998).
Recent inventories of western juniper in eastern Oregon indicate
juniper woodlands and savannahs cover an area of over five million
acres (Gedney et al. 1999). Comparisons with data generated by earlier
inventories suggest the area supporting western juniper has increased
fivefold since 1936. Harney County is one of four counties in Oregon
that contain more than one-half million acres of western juniper
woodlands.
Sage-grouse are sensitive to juniper encroachment and have been
shown to avoid juniper communities for nesting
[[Page 34315]]
and winter habitat (Miller et al. 2005). Continued expansion of juniper
will lead to further losses of suitable sage-grouse habitat. While the
problem of juniper encroachment is prevalent across the Resource Area,
the Glass Butte/Rye Grass area was selected to expand upon a small-
scale project completed there in 2006.
Initial scoping (March 1 to April 1, 2007) for the GSHIP expressed
interest from the public in harvesting downed juniper for fuel wood,
posts and poles. Additional preliminary issues and management concerns
identified by BLM personnel and the public include management of Air
Quality, Water Quality, Migratory Birds, Special Status Species fauna
and flora, Noxious Weeds, Cultural Heritage and Hazardous Materials.
An interdisciplinary approach will be used to develop the EA in
order to consider the variety of resource issues and concerns
identified. Disciplines involved in the project will include (but not
be limited to) those with expertise in management of the aforementioned
resources.
Dated: June 11, 2008.
Dana R. Shuford,
Burns District Manager.
[FR Doc. E8-13582 Filed 6-16-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-P