Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; Multipurpose Application, 34250-34251 [E8-13503]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
34250
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 117 / Tuesday, June 17, 2008 / Notices
activities related to a transaction
whereby any Denied Person acquires or
attempts to acquire such ownership,
possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or
to facilitate the acquisition or attempted
acquisition from any Denied Person of
any item subject to the EAR that has
been exported from the United States;
D. Obtain from any Denied Person in
the United States any item subject to the
EAR with knowledge or reason to know
that the item will be, or is intended to
be, exported from the United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service
any item subject to the EAR that has
been or will be exported from the
United States and which is owned,
possessed or controlled by any Denied
Person, or service any item, of whatever
origin, that is owned, possessed or
controlled by any Denied Person if such
service involves the use of any item
subject to the EAR that has been or will
be exported from the United States. For
purposes of this paragraph, servicing
means installation, maintenance, repair,
modification or testing.
Third, that, Ankair, Yesilkoy Asfalti
Istanbul No. 13/4, Florya, Istanbul,
Turkey TR 34810, may not, directly or
indirectly, participate in any way in any
transaction involving the Boeing 747
(manufacturer serial number 24134, and
current tail number TC–AKZ) including,
but not limited to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using
any license, license exception, or export
control document involving Boeing 747
(manufacturer serial number 24134, and
current tail number TC–AKZ);
B. Carrying on negotiations
concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering,
storing, disposing of, forwarding,
transporting, financing, or otherwise
servicing in any way, any transaction
involving Boeing 747 (manufacturer
serial number 24134, and current tail
number TC–AKZ);
C. Benefiting in any way from any
transaction involving Boeing 747
(manufacturer serial number 24134, and
current tail number TC–AKZ)
Fourth, that no person may, directly
or indirectly, do any of the following:
A. Export or re-export on behalf of
Ankair the Boeing 747 (manufacturer
serial number 24134, and current tail
number TC–AKZ); or
B. Take any action to acquire from,
lease, or otherwise facilitate the
acquisition or attempted acquisition
from Ankair of the Boeing 747
(manufacturer serial number 24134, and
current tail number TC–AKZ).
Fifth, that after notice and
opportunity for comment as provided in
section 766.23 of the EAR, any other
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:10 Jun 16, 2008
Jkt 214001
person, firm, corporation, or business
organization related to any of the
Respondents by affiliation, ownership,
control, or position of responsibility in
the conduct of trade or related services
may also be made subject to the
provisions of this Order.
Sixth, that this Order does not
prohibit any export, reexport, or other
transaction subject to the EAR where the
only items involved that are subject to
the EAR are the foreign-produced direct
product of U.S.-origin technology.
In accordance with the provisions of
Section 766.24(e) of the EAR, the
Respondents may, at any time, appeal
this Order by filing a full written
statement in support of the appeal with
the Office of the Administrative Law
Judge, U.S. Coast Guard ALJ Docketing
Center, 40 South Gay Street, Baltimore,
Maryland 21202–4022.
In accordance with the provisions of
Section 766.24(d) of the EAR, BIS may
seek renewal of this Order by filing a
written request not later than 20 days
before the expiration date. The
Respondents may oppose a request to
renew this Order by filing a written
submission with the Assistant Secretary
for Export Enforcement, which must be
received not later than seven days
before the expiration date of the Order.
A copy of this Order shall be served
on the Respondents and shall be
published in the Federal Register.
This Order is effective upon issuance
and shall remain in effect for 180 days.
Entered this 6th day of June 2008.
Darryl W. Jackson,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. E8–13571 Filed 6–16–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DT–P
Bureau of Industry and Security
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request; Multipurpose
Application
Bureau of Industry and
Security.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or August 18, 2008.
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
I. Abstract
This collection is required in
compliance with U.S. export
regulations. The information furnished
by U.S. exporters provides the basis for
decisions to grant licenses for export,
reexport, and classifications of
commodities, goods and technologies
that are controlled for reasons of
national security and foreign policy.
II. Method of Collection
Submitted electronically and on
paper.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: 0694–0088.
Form Number(s): BIS–748P.
Type of Review: Business or other forprofit organizations.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
20,489.
Estimated Time Per Response: 30 to
90 minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 15,359.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to
Public: $103,747.
IV. Request for Comments
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
PO 00000
Direct all written comments
to Diana Hynek, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6625,
14th and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet at dHynek@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument and instructions should be
directed to Larry Hall, BIS ICB Liaison,
(202) 482–4896, lhall@bis.doc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Sfmt 4703
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
E:\FR\FM\17JNN1.SGM
17JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 117 / Tuesday, June 17, 2008 / Notices
Dated: June 11, 2008.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E8–13503 Filed 6–16–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–33–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–831]
Fresh Garlic from the People’s
Republic of China: Final Results and
Partial Rescission of the 12th
Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: June 17, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Matthew Renkey, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 9, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–2312.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Case History
On December 10, 2007, the
Department of Commerce (the
‘‘Department’’) published in the Federal
Register the preliminary results of the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on fresh garlic
from the People’s Republic of China
(‘‘PRC’’). See Fresh Garlic from the
People’s Republic of China: Notice of
Preliminary Results and Preliminary
Partial Rescission of the Twelfth
Administrative Review, 72 FR 69652
(December 10, 2007) (‘‘Preliminary
Results’’) Since the Preliminary Results,
the following events have occurred.
On January 9, 2008, The Fresh Garlic
Producers Association: Christopher
Ranch L.L.C.; The Garlic Company;
Valley Garlic; and Vessey and Company,
Inc. (‘‘Petitioners’’), Jinxiang Dong Yun
Freezing Storage Co., Ltd. (‘‘Dong
Yun’’), Shanghai LJ International
Trading Co., Ltd. (‘‘Shanghai LJ’’), and
Qingdao Saturn International Trade Co.,
Ltd. (‘‘Qingdao Saturn’’) submitted case
briefs. After reviewing the case briefs,
the Department instructed Dong Yun
and Shanghai LJ to re–file their case
briefs because they contained untimely
new factual information. Dong Yun and
Shanghai LJ filed the final versions of
their redacted case briefs on January 16,
2008. Also on January 16, 2008, the
Petitioners, Dong Yun, and Shanghai LJ
submitted rebuttal briefs. On January 23,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:10 Jun 16, 2008
Jkt 214001
2008, the Department extended the time
limit for completion of the final results
of this administrative review by 60 days.
See Fresh Garlic from the People’s
Republic of China: Extension of Time
Limit for Final Results of the Twelfth
Administrative Review, 73 FR 16640
(March 28, 2008). On April 10, 2008, the
Department conducted a public hearing,
and counsel for the Petitioners, Dong
Yun, and Qingdao Saturn participated.
Scope Of The Order
The products covered by this Order
are all grades of garlic, whole or
separated into constituent cloves,
whether or not peeled, fresh, chilled,
frozen, provisionally preserved, or
packed in water or other neutral
substance, but not prepared or
preserved by the addition of other
ingredients or heat processing. The
differences between grades are based on
color, size, sheathing, and level of
decay. The scope of this order does not
include the following: (a) garlic that has
been mechanically harvested and that is
primarily, but not exclusively, destined
for non–fresh use; or (b) garlic that has
been specially prepared and cultivated
prior to planting and then harvested and
otherwise prepared for use as seed. The
subject merchandise is used principally
as a food product and for seasoning. The
subject garlic is currently classifiable
under subheadings 0703.20.0010,
0703.20.0020, 0703.20.0090,
0710.80.7060, 0710.80.9750,
0711.90.6000, and 2005.90.9700 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (‘‘HTSUS’’). Although the
HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, our
written description of the scope of this
order is dispositive. In order to be
excluded from the Order, garlic entered
under the HTSUS subheadings listed
above that is (1) mechanically harvested
and primarily, but not exclusively,
destined for non–fresh use or (2)
specially prepared and cultivated prior
to planting and then harvested and
otherwise prepared for use as seed must
be accompanied by declarations to CBP
to that effect.
Analysis Of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs by parties to this
proceeding and to which we have
responded are listed in the Appendix to
this notice and addressed in the Issues
and Decision Memorandum (‘‘Final
Decision Memo’’), which is hereby
adopted by this notice. Parties can find
a complete discussion of the issues
raised in this administrative review and
the corresponding recommendations in
this public memorandum which is on
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
34251
file in the Central Records Unit
(‘‘CRU’’), Room 1117 of the main
Department building. In addition, a
copy of the Final Decision Memo can be
accessed directly on our website at
https://www.ia.ita.doc.gov/. The paper
copy and electronic version of the Final
Decision Memo are identical in content.
Changes Since The Preliminary Results
Based on a review of the record as
well as comments received from parties
regarding our Preliminary Results, we
have made revisions to the margin
calculations for Dong Yun and Shanghai
LJ for the final results. For all changes
to the calculations for Dong Yun and
Shanghai LJ, see the Final Decision
Memo and the company–specific
analysis memoranda.
Adverse Facts Available
Section 776(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’) provides
that if an interested party: (A) withholds
information that has been requested by
the Department; (B) fails to provide such
information in a timely manner or in the
form or manner requested, subject to
subsections 782(c)(1) and (e) of the Act;
(C) significantly impedes a
determination under the antidumping
statute; or (D) provides such information
but the information cannot be verified,
the Department shall, subject to
subsection 782(d) of the Act, use facts
otherwise available in reaching the
applicable determination.
Furthermore, section 776(b) of the Act
provides that, if the Department finds
that an interested party ‘‘has failed to
cooperate by not acting to the best of its
ability to comply with a request for
information,’’ the Department may use
information that is adverse to the
interests of that party as facts otherwise
available. Adverse inferences are
appropriate ‘‘to ensure that the party
does not obtain a more favorable result
by failing to cooperate than if it had
cooperated fully.’’ See Statement of
Administrative Action (‘‘SAA’’)
accompanying the URAA, H.R. Doc. No.
316, 103d Cong., 2d Session at 870
(1994). An adverse inference may
include reliance on information derived
from the petition, the final
determination in the investigation, any
previous review, or any other
information placed on the record. See
section 776(b) of the Act.
In the Preliminary Results, the
Department assigned a rate based on the
use of total adverse facts available
(‘‘AFA’’) to the PRC–Wide Entity,
including Huaiyang Hongda Dehydrated
Vegetable Company (‘‘Huaiyang
E:\FR\FM\17JNN1.SGM
17JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 117 (Tuesday, June 17, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34250-34251]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-13503]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; Multipurpose
Application
AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and Security.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce, as part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public
and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or August 18, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Diana Hynek, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer, Department of Commerce, Room 6625, 14th
and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet
at dHynek@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection instrument and instructions should
be directed to Larry Hall, BIS ICB Liaison, (202) 482-4896,
lhall@bis.doc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
This collection is required in compliance with U.S. export
regulations. The information furnished by U.S. exporters provides the
basis for decisions to grant licenses for export, reexport, and
classifications of commodities, goods and technologies that are
controlled for reasons of national security and foreign policy.
II. Method of Collection
Submitted electronically and on paper.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: 0694-0088.
Form Number(s): BIS-748P.
Type of Review: Business or other for-profit organizations.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 20,489.
Estimated Time Per Response: 30 to 90 minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 15,359.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to Public: $103,747.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on respondents, including through the use of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized
and/or included in the request for OMB approval of this information
collection; they also will become a matter of public record.
[[Page 34251]]
Dated: June 11, 2008.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E8-13503 Filed 6-16-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-33-P
