Public Information Collection Requirement Submitted to OMB for Review and Approval, Comments Requested, 34015-34016 [E8-13526]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 116 / Monday, June 16, 2008 / Notices
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Board of Scientific Counselors,
Homeland Security Subcommittee
Meeting—Spring 2008 Docket, EPA/DC,
EPA West, Room B102, 1301
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington,
DC. The Public Reading Room is open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the ORD
Docket is (202) 566–1752.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Designated Federal Officer via mail at:
Greg Susanke, Mail Drop 8104–R, Office
of Science Policy, Office of Research
and Development, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1300 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460; via
phone/voice mail at: (202) 564–9945;
via fax at: (202) 565–2911; or via e-mail
at: susanke.greg@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
General Information
The meeting is open to the public.
Any member of the public interested in
receiving a draft BOSC agenda or
making a presentation at the meeting
may contact Greg Susanke, the
Designated Federal Officer, via any of
the contact methods listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
above. In general, each individual
making an oral presentation will be
limited to a total of three minutes.
EPA ORD is conducting a prospective
and retrospective independent expert
review through the BOSC, of its
Homeland Security Research Program,
to evaluate the program’s relevance,
quality, performance, and scientific
leadership. The BOSC’s evaluation and
recommendations will provide guidance
to ORD’s National Homeland Security
Research Center. Proposed agenda items
for the meeting include, but are not
limited to: review and discussion of the
draft subcommittee report which
includes overall comments and
recommendations to ORD’s National
Homeland Security Research Program,
and responses to subcommittee charge
questions.
Information on Services for
Individuals with Disabilities: For
information on access or services for
individuals with disabilities, please
contact Greg Susanke at (202) 564–9945
or susanke.greg@epa.gov. To request
accommodation of a disability, please
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:04 Jun 13, 2008
Jkt 214001
contact Greg Susanke, preferably at least
10 days prior to the meeting, to give
EPA as much time as possible to process
your request.
Dated: June 9, 2008.
Mary Ellen Radzikowski,
Acting Office Director, Office of Science
Policy.
[FR Doc. E8–13483 Filed 6–13–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–ORD–2003–0002; FRL–8579–7]
Notice of Availability for the
Framework for Application of the
Toxicity Equivalence Methodology for
Polychlorinated Dioxins, Furans, and
Biphenyls in Ecological Risk
Assessment
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of document availability.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) is announcing
the availability of the final ‘‘Framework
for Application of the Toxicity
Equivalence Methodology for
Polychlorinated Dioxins, Furans, and
Biphenyls in Ecological Risk
Assessment’’ (EPA/100/R–08/004). The
purpose of the Framework is to assist
EPA scientists in using the toxicity
equivalence methodology to assess
ecological risks from mixtures of dioxinlike chemicals, i.e., polychlorinated
dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs),
dibenzofurans (PCDFs), and biphenyls
(PCBs), as well as to inform EPA
decision makers, other agencies, and the
public about this methodology. This
framework provides an introduction to
the toxicity equivalence methodology,
offers considerations for how and when
to apply the methodology, and presents
practical examples of its use. The
Framework thus serves to enhance the
application of the best available science.
This document is not intended to serve
as guidance on how to conduct a
comprehensive risk assessment for
dioxin-like chemicals or to act as a
regulation or binding policy. EPA’s Risk
Assessment Forum oversaw the
development of this document,
incorporating input obtained from an
expert workshop, scientists throughout
the Agency, stakeholders, and a peer
review by twelve experts from a range
of scientific disciplines.
ADDRESSES: The final document is
available electronically through the EPA
Office of the Science Advisor’s Web site
at: https://www.epa.gov/osa/raf/
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
34015
tefframework/. A limited number of
paper copies will be available from
EPA’s National Service Center for
Environmental Publications (NSCEP),
P.O. Box 42419, Cincinnati, OH 45242;
telephone 1–800–490–9198 or 513–489–
8190; facsimile 301–604–3408; e-mail
NSCEP@bps-lmit.com. Please provide
your name and mailing addresses and
the title and EPA number (as given
above) of the requested publication.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Seema Schappelle, Risk Assessment
Forum, Mail Code 8105R,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,Washington,
DC 20460; telephone number: (202)
564–3372; fax number: (202) 564–2070,
E-mail: schappelle.seema@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For more
than a decade, EPA and other
organizations have estimated the
combined risks that mixtures of PCDDs,
PCDFs, and PCBs pose to human health
using the toxicity equivalence
methodology. As both data and
experience with the methodology have
accumulated, experts have come to the
consensus that the toxicity equivalence
methodology can strengthen
assessments of ecological risks as well.
In 1998, EPA and DOI sponsored a
workshop that recommended the
development of further guidance on
application of the toxicity equivalence
methodology in ecological risk
assessment. This framework has been
developed in direct response to that
workshop recommendation. EPA
consulted with other federal agencies at
key points during the document’s
development. In July 2003, EPA
released a draft Framework for a 60-day
public comment period. An external
peer review was conducted in 2004 by
twelve experts from a range of scientific
disciplines.
Dated: May 15, 2008.
George M. Gray,
EPA Science Advisor.
[FR Doc. E8–13484 Filed 6–13–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
Public Information Collection
Requirement Submitted to OMB for
Review and Approval, Comments
Requested
June 5, 2008.
SUMMARY: The Federal Communications
Commission, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork burdens,
invites the general public and other
Federal agencies to take this
E:\FR\FM\16JNN1.SGM
16JNN1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
34016
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 116 / Monday, June 16, 2008 / Notices
opportunity to comment on the
following information collections, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (PRA), Public Law No. 104–
13. An agency may not conduct or
sponsor a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid
control number. Pursuant to the PRA,
no person shall be subject to any
penalty for failing to comply with a
collection of information that does not
display a valid control number.
Comments are requested concerning (a)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s
burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on the respondents,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
DATES: Written PRA comments should
be submitted on or before July 16, 2008.
If you anticipate that you will be
submitting comments, but find it
difficult to do so within the period of
time allowed by this notice, you should
advise the contacts listed below as soon
as possible.
ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to
Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of
Management and Budget, via Internet at
Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov or via
fax at (202) 395–5167; and to Cathy
Williams, Federal Communications
Commission, Room 1–C823, 445 12th
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554, or
via Internet at Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov
and/or PRA@fcc.gov. Include in the
comments the OMB control number of
the collection as shown in the
‘‘Supplementary Information’’ section
below or, if there is no OMB control
number, the Title as shown in the
‘‘Supplementary Information’’ section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
additional information or copies of the
information collection, contact Cathy
Williams at 202–418–2918, or via
Internet at Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov, and/
or PRA@fcc.gov. To view a copy of this
information collection request (ICR)
submitted to OMB: (1) Go to the Web
page https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAMain, (2) look for the section of the
Web page called ‘‘Currently Under
Review,’’ (3) click on the downwardpointing arrow in the ‘‘Select Agency’’
box below the ‘‘Currently Under
Review’’ heading, (4) select ‘‘Federal
Communications Commission’’ from the
list of agencies presented in the ‘‘Select
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:04 Jun 13, 2008
Jkt 214001
Agency’’ box, (5) click the ‘‘Submit’’
button to the right of the ‘‘Select
Agency’’ box, (6) when the list of FCC
ICRs currently under review appears,
look for the OMB control number of this
ICR you want to review (or its Title if
there is no OMB control number) and
then click on the ICR Reference
Number. A copy of the FCC submission
to OMB will be displayed.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control Number: 3060–0463.
Title: Telecommunications Relay
Services and Speech-to-Speech Services
for Individuals with Hearing and
Speech Disabilities, Report and Order
and Declaratory Ruling, CG Docket No.
03–123, FCC 07–186.
Form Number: N/A.
Type of Review: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities; State, local or tribal
government.
Number of Respondents and
Responses: 5,045 respondents; 5,211
responses.
Estimated Time per Response: 10–15
hours.
Frequency of Response: Annual
reporting requirement; Recordkeeping
requirement; Third Party Disclosure.
Total Annual Burden: 27,412 hours.
Total Annual Cost: None.
Obligation to Respond: Required to
obtain or retain benefit. The statutory
authority can be found at section 225 of
the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 225.
The law was enacted on July 26, 1990,
as Title IV of the Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law
101–336, 104 Stat. 327.
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality:
An assurance of confidentiality is not
offered because this information
collection does not require the
collection of personally identifiable
information from individuals.
Privacy Impact Assessment: No
impact(s).
Needs and Uses: On November 19,
2007, the Commission released the
Telecommunications Relay Services and
Speech-to-Speech Services for
Individuals with Hearing and Speech
Disabilities, Report and Order and
Declaratory Ruling (2007 TRS Cost
Recovery Order), CG Docket No. 03–123,
FCC 07–186, adopting (1) A new cost
recovery methodology for interstate
traditional Telecommunications Relay
Services (TRS) and interstate Speech-toSpeech (STS) based on the Muliti-state
Average Rate Structure (MARS) plan
proposed by Hamilton Relay, Inc., (2) a
new cost recovery methodology for
interstate captioned telephone service
(CTS) and interstate and intrastate
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Internet-Protocol (IP) Captioned
Telephone Service (IP CTS) based on
the MARS plan, (3) a cost recovery
methodology for IP Relay based on price
caps, and (4) a cost recovery
methodology for Video Relay Services
(VRS) that adopts tiered rates based on
call volume. The 2007 TRS Cost
Recovery Order also clarifies the nature
and extent that certain categories of
costs are compensable from the
Interstate TRS Fund (Fund), and
addresses certain issues concerning the
management and oversight of the Fund,
including financial incentives offered to
consumers to make relay calls and the
role of the Interstate TRS Fund Advisory
Council.
The 2007 TRS Cost Recovery Order
establishes reporting requirements
associated with the MARS plan cost
recovery methodology for compensation
from the Fund. Specifically, TRS
providers must submit to the Fund
administrator the following information
annually, on a per-state basis, regarding
the previous calendar year: (1) The perminute compensation rate(s) for
intrastate traditional TRS, STS and CTS,
(2) whether the rate applies to session
minutes or conversation minutes, (3) the
number of intrastate session minutes for
traditional TRS, STS and CTS, and (4)
the number of intrastate conversation
minutes for traditional TRS, STS, and
CTS. Also, STS providers must file a
report annually with the Fund
administrator and the Commission on
their specific outreach efforts directly
attributable to the additional
compensation approved by the
Commission for STS outreach.
In the 2007 TRS Cost Recovery Order,
the Commission has assessed the effects
of imposing the submission of rate data,
and has found that there is no increased
administrative burden on businesses
with fewer than 25 employees. The
Commission recognizes that the
required rate data is presently available
with the states and the providers of
interstate traditional TRS, interstate
STS, and interstate CTS, thereby no
additional step is required to produce
such data. The Commission therefore
believes that the submission of the rate
data does not increase an administrative
burden on businesses.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–13526 Filed 6–13–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
E:\FR\FM\16JNN1.SGM
16JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 116 (Monday, June 16, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34015-34016]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-13526]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Public Information Collection Requirement Submitted to OMB for
Review and Approval, Comments Requested
June 5, 2008.
SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Commission, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to take this
[[Page 34016]]
opportunity to comment on the following information collections, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), Public Law No.
104-13. An agency may not conduct or sponsor a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid control number.
Pursuant to the PRA, no person shall be subject to any penalty for
failing to comply with a collection of information that does not
display a valid control number. Comments are requested concerning (a)
Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including
whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy
of the Commission's burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information on the
respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
DATES: Written PRA comments should be submitted on or before July 16,
2008. If you anticipate that you will be submitting comments, but find
it difficult to do so within the period of time allowed by this notice,
you should advise the contacts listed below as soon as possible.
ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of
Management and Budget, via Internet at Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov
or via fax at (202) 395-5167; and to Cathy Williams, Federal
Communications Commission, Room 1-C823, 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20554, or via Internet at Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov and/or
PRA@fcc.gov. Include in the comments the OMB control number of the
collection as shown in the ``Supplementary Information'' section below
or, if there is no OMB control number, the Title as shown in the
``Supplementary Information'' section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information or copies
of the information collection, contact Cathy Williams at 202-418-2918,
or via Internet at Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov, and/or PRA@fcc.gov. To view
a copy of this information collection request (ICR) submitted to OMB:
(1) Go to the Web page https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain, (2)
look for the section of the Web page called ``Currently Under Review,''
(3) click on the downward-pointing arrow in the ``Select Agency'' box
below the ``Currently Under Review'' heading, (4) select ``Federal
Communications Commission'' from the list of agencies presented in the
``Select Agency'' box, (5) click the ``Submit'' button to the right of
the ``Select Agency'' box, (6) when the list of FCC ICRs currently
under review appears, look for the OMB control number of this ICR you
want to review (or its Title if there is no OMB control number) and
then click on the ICR Reference Number. A copy of the FCC submission to
OMB will be displayed.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control Number: 3060-0463.
Title: Telecommunications Relay Services and Speech-to-Speech
Services for Individuals with Hearing and Speech Disabilities, Report
and Order and Declaratory Ruling, CG Docket No. 03-123, FCC 07-186.
Form Number: N/A.
Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other for-profit entities; State, local or
tribal government.
Number of Respondents and Responses: 5,045 respondents; 5,211
responses.
Estimated Time per Response: 10-15 hours.
Frequency of Response: Annual reporting requirement; Recordkeeping
requirement; Third Party Disclosure.
Total Annual Burden: 27,412 hours.
Total Annual Cost: None.
Obligation to Respond: Required to obtain or retain benefit. The
statutory authority can be found at section 225 of the Communications
Act, 47 U.S.C. 225. The law was enacted on July 26, 1990, as Title IV
of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 101-336, 104
Stat. 327.
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: An assurance of
confidentiality is not offered because this information collection does
not require the collection of personally identifiable information from
individuals.
Privacy Impact Assessment: No impact(s).
Needs and Uses: On November 19, 2007, the Commission released the
Telecommunications Relay Services and Speech-to-Speech Services for
Individuals with Hearing and Speech Disabilities, Report and Order and
Declaratory Ruling (2007 TRS Cost Recovery Order), CG Docket No. 03-
123, FCC 07-186, adopting (1) A new cost recovery methodology for
interstate traditional Telecommunications Relay Services (TRS) and
interstate Speech-to-Speech (STS) based on the Muliti-state Average
Rate Structure (MARS) plan proposed by Hamilton Relay, Inc., (2) a new
cost recovery methodology for interstate captioned telephone service
(CTS) and interstate and intrastate Internet-Protocol (IP) Captioned
Telephone Service (IP CTS) based on the MARS plan, (3) a cost recovery
methodology for IP Relay based on price caps, and (4) a cost recovery
methodology for Video Relay Services (VRS) that adopts tiered rates
based on call volume. The 2007 TRS Cost Recovery Order also clarifies
the nature and extent that certain categories of costs are compensable
from the Interstate TRS Fund (Fund), and addresses certain issues
concerning the management and oversight of the Fund, including
financial incentives offered to consumers to make relay calls and the
role of the Interstate TRS Fund Advisory Council.
The 2007 TRS Cost Recovery Order establishes reporting requirements
associated with the MARS plan cost recovery methodology for
compensation from the Fund. Specifically, TRS providers must submit to
the Fund administrator the following information annually, on a per-
state basis, regarding the previous calendar year: (1) The per-minute
compensation rate(s) for intrastate traditional TRS, STS and CTS, (2)
whether the rate applies to session minutes or conversation minutes,
(3) the number of intrastate session minutes for traditional TRS, STS
and CTS, and (4) the number of intrastate conversation minutes for
traditional TRS, STS, and CTS. Also, STS providers must file a report
annually with the Fund administrator and the Commission on their
specific outreach efforts directly attributable to the additional
compensation approved by the Commission for STS outreach.
In the 2007 TRS Cost Recovery Order, the Commission has assessed
the effects of imposing the submission of rate data, and has found that
there is no increased administrative burden on businesses with fewer
than 25 employees. The Commission recognizes that the required rate
data is presently available with the states and the providers of
interstate traditional TRS, interstate STS, and interstate CTS, thereby
no additional step is required to produce such data. The Commission
therefore believes that the submission of the rate data does not
increase an administrative burden on businesses.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-13526 Filed 6-13-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P