Public Information Collection Requirement Submitted to OMB for Review and Approval, Comments Requested, 34015-34016 [E8-13526]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 116 / Monday, June 16, 2008 / Notices restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically in https:// www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Board of Scientific Counselors, Homeland Security Subcommittee Meeting—Spring 2008 Docket, EPA/DC, EPA West, Room B102, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, and the telephone number for the ORD Docket is (202) 566–1752. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Designated Federal Officer via mail at: Greg Susanke, Mail Drop 8104–R, Office of Science Policy, Office of Research and Development, Environmental Protection Agency, 1300 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460; via phone/voice mail at: (202) 564–9945; via fax at: (202) 565–2911; or via e-mail at: susanke.greg@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES General Information The meeting is open to the public. Any member of the public interested in receiving a draft BOSC agenda or making a presentation at the meeting may contact Greg Susanke, the Designated Federal Officer, via any of the contact methods listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section above. In general, each individual making an oral presentation will be limited to a total of three minutes. EPA ORD is conducting a prospective and retrospective independent expert review through the BOSC, of its Homeland Security Research Program, to evaluate the program’s relevance, quality, performance, and scientific leadership. The BOSC’s evaluation and recommendations will provide guidance to ORD’s National Homeland Security Research Center. Proposed agenda items for the meeting include, but are not limited to: review and discussion of the draft subcommittee report which includes overall comments and recommendations to ORD’s National Homeland Security Research Program, and responses to subcommittee charge questions. Information on Services for Individuals with Disabilities: For information on access or services for individuals with disabilities, please contact Greg Susanke at (202) 564–9945 or susanke.greg@epa.gov. To request accommodation of a disability, please VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:04 Jun 13, 2008 Jkt 214001 contact Greg Susanke, preferably at least 10 days prior to the meeting, to give EPA as much time as possible to process your request. Dated: June 9, 2008. Mary Ellen Radzikowski, Acting Office Director, Office of Science Policy. [FR Doc. E8–13483 Filed 6–13–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [EPA–HQ–ORD–2003–0002; FRL–8579–7] Notice of Availability for the Framework for Application of the Toxicity Equivalence Methodology for Polychlorinated Dioxins, Furans, and Biphenyls in Ecological Risk Assessment Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice of document availability. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is announcing the availability of the final ‘‘Framework for Application of the Toxicity Equivalence Methodology for Polychlorinated Dioxins, Furans, and Biphenyls in Ecological Risk Assessment’’ (EPA/100/R–08/004). The purpose of the Framework is to assist EPA scientists in using the toxicity equivalence methodology to assess ecological risks from mixtures of dioxinlike chemicals, i.e., polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs), dibenzofurans (PCDFs), and biphenyls (PCBs), as well as to inform EPA decision makers, other agencies, and the public about this methodology. This framework provides an introduction to the toxicity equivalence methodology, offers considerations for how and when to apply the methodology, and presents practical examples of its use. The Framework thus serves to enhance the application of the best available science. This document is not intended to serve as guidance on how to conduct a comprehensive risk assessment for dioxin-like chemicals or to act as a regulation or binding policy. EPA’s Risk Assessment Forum oversaw the development of this document, incorporating input obtained from an expert workshop, scientists throughout the Agency, stakeholders, and a peer review by twelve experts from a range of scientific disciplines. ADDRESSES: The final document is available electronically through the EPA Office of the Science Advisor’s Web site at: https://www.epa.gov/osa/raf/ PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 34015 tefframework/. A limited number of paper copies will be available from EPA’s National Service Center for Environmental Publications (NSCEP), P.O. Box 42419, Cincinnati, OH 45242; telephone 1–800–490–9198 or 513–489– 8190; facsimile 301–604–3408; e-mail NSCEP@bps-lmit.com. Please provide your name and mailing addresses and the title and EPA number (as given above) of the requested publication. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Seema Schappelle, Risk Assessment Forum, Mail Code 8105R, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: (202) 564–3372; fax number: (202) 564–2070, E-mail: schappelle.seema@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For more than a decade, EPA and other organizations have estimated the combined risks that mixtures of PCDDs, PCDFs, and PCBs pose to human health using the toxicity equivalence methodology. As both data and experience with the methodology have accumulated, experts have come to the consensus that the toxicity equivalence methodology can strengthen assessments of ecological risks as well. In 1998, EPA and DOI sponsored a workshop that recommended the development of further guidance on application of the toxicity equivalence methodology in ecological risk assessment. This framework has been developed in direct response to that workshop recommendation. EPA consulted with other federal agencies at key points during the document’s development. In July 2003, EPA released a draft Framework for a 60-day public comment period. An external peer review was conducted in 2004 by twelve experts from a range of scientific disciplines. Dated: May 15, 2008. George M. Gray, EPA Science Advisor. [FR Doc. E8–13484 Filed 6–13–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Public Information Collection Requirement Submitted to OMB for Review and Approval, Comments Requested June 5, 2008. SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Commission, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this E:\FR\FM\16JNN1.SGM 16JNN1 rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES 34016 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 116 / Monday, June 16, 2008 / Notices opportunity to comment on the following information collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), Public Law No. 104– 13. An agency may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid control number. Pursuant to the PRA, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information that does not display a valid control number. Comments are requested concerning (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission’s burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. DATES: Written PRA comments should be submitted on or before July 16, 2008. If you anticipate that you will be submitting comments, but find it difficult to do so within the period of time allowed by this notice, you should advise the contacts listed below as soon as possible. ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of Management and Budget, via Internet at Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov or via fax at (202) 395–5167; and to Cathy Williams, Federal Communications Commission, Room 1–C823, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554, or via Internet at Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov and/or PRA@fcc.gov. Include in the comments the OMB control number of the collection as shown in the ‘‘Supplementary Information’’ section below or, if there is no OMB control number, the Title as shown in the ‘‘Supplementary Information’’ section. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information or copies of the information collection, contact Cathy Williams at 202–418–2918, or via Internet at Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov, and/ or PRA@fcc.gov. To view a copy of this information collection request (ICR) submitted to OMB: (1) Go to the Web page https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/ PRAMain, (2) look for the section of the Web page called ‘‘Currently Under Review,’’ (3) click on the downwardpointing arrow in the ‘‘Select Agency’’ box below the ‘‘Currently Under Review’’ heading, (4) select ‘‘Federal Communications Commission’’ from the list of agencies presented in the ‘‘Select VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:04 Jun 13, 2008 Jkt 214001 Agency’’ box, (5) click the ‘‘Submit’’ button to the right of the ‘‘Select Agency’’ box, (6) when the list of FCC ICRs currently under review appears, look for the OMB control number of this ICR you want to review (or its Title if there is no OMB control number) and then click on the ICR Reference Number. A copy of the FCC submission to OMB will be displayed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OMB Control Number: 3060–0463. Title: Telecommunications Relay Services and Speech-to-Speech Services for Individuals with Hearing and Speech Disabilities, Report and Order and Declaratory Ruling, CG Docket No. 03–123, FCC 07–186. Form Number: N/A. Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection. Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities; State, local or tribal government. Number of Respondents and Responses: 5,045 respondents; 5,211 responses. Estimated Time per Response: 10–15 hours. Frequency of Response: Annual reporting requirement; Recordkeeping requirement; Third Party Disclosure. Total Annual Burden: 27,412 hours. Total Annual Cost: None. Obligation to Respond: Required to obtain or retain benefit. The statutory authority can be found at section 225 of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 225. The law was enacted on July 26, 1990, as Title IV of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 101–336, 104 Stat. 327. Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: An assurance of confidentiality is not offered because this information collection does not require the collection of personally identifiable information from individuals. Privacy Impact Assessment: No impact(s). Needs and Uses: On November 19, 2007, the Commission released the Telecommunications Relay Services and Speech-to-Speech Services for Individuals with Hearing and Speech Disabilities, Report and Order and Declaratory Ruling (2007 TRS Cost Recovery Order), CG Docket No. 03–123, FCC 07–186, adopting (1) A new cost recovery methodology for interstate traditional Telecommunications Relay Services (TRS) and interstate Speech-toSpeech (STS) based on the Muliti-state Average Rate Structure (MARS) plan proposed by Hamilton Relay, Inc., (2) a new cost recovery methodology for interstate captioned telephone service (CTS) and interstate and intrastate PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Internet-Protocol (IP) Captioned Telephone Service (IP CTS) based on the MARS plan, (3) a cost recovery methodology for IP Relay based on price caps, and (4) a cost recovery methodology for Video Relay Services (VRS) that adopts tiered rates based on call volume. The 2007 TRS Cost Recovery Order also clarifies the nature and extent that certain categories of costs are compensable from the Interstate TRS Fund (Fund), and addresses certain issues concerning the management and oversight of the Fund, including financial incentives offered to consumers to make relay calls and the role of the Interstate TRS Fund Advisory Council. The 2007 TRS Cost Recovery Order establishes reporting requirements associated with the MARS plan cost recovery methodology for compensation from the Fund. Specifically, TRS providers must submit to the Fund administrator the following information annually, on a per-state basis, regarding the previous calendar year: (1) The perminute compensation rate(s) for intrastate traditional TRS, STS and CTS, (2) whether the rate applies to session minutes or conversation minutes, (3) the number of intrastate session minutes for traditional TRS, STS and CTS, and (4) the number of intrastate conversation minutes for traditional TRS, STS, and CTS. Also, STS providers must file a report annually with the Fund administrator and the Commission on their specific outreach efforts directly attributable to the additional compensation approved by the Commission for STS outreach. In the 2007 TRS Cost Recovery Order, the Commission has assessed the effects of imposing the submission of rate data, and has found that there is no increased administrative burden on businesses with fewer than 25 employees. The Commission recognizes that the required rate data is presently available with the states and the providers of interstate traditional TRS, interstate STS, and interstate CTS, thereby no additional step is required to produce such data. The Commission therefore believes that the submission of the rate data does not increase an administrative burden on businesses. Federal Communications Commission. Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary. [FR Doc. E8–13526 Filed 6–13–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712–01–P E:\FR\FM\16JNN1.SGM 16JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 116 (Monday, June 16, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34015-34016]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-13526]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION


Public Information Collection Requirement Submitted to OMB for 
Review and Approval, Comments Requested

June 5, 2008.
SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Commission, as part of its 
continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, invites the general 
public and other Federal agencies to take this

[[Page 34016]]

opportunity to comment on the following information collections, as 
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), Public Law No. 
104-13. An agency may not conduct or sponsor a collection of 
information unless it displays a currently valid control number. 
Pursuant to the PRA, no person shall be subject to any penalty for 
failing to comply with a collection of information that does not 
display a valid control number. Comments are requested concerning (a) 
Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the 
proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including 
whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy 
of the Commission's burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance the quality, 
utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to 
minimize the burden of the collection of information on the 
respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or 
other forms of information technology.

DATES: Written PRA comments should be submitted on or before July 16, 
2008. If you anticipate that you will be submitting comments, but find 
it difficult to do so within the period of time allowed by this notice, 
you should advise the contacts listed below as soon as possible.

ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of 
Management and Budget, via Internet at Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov 
or via fax at (202) 395-5167; and to Cathy Williams, Federal 
Communications Commission, Room 1-C823, 445 12th Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20554, or via Internet at Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov and/or 
PRA@fcc.gov. Include in the comments the OMB control number of the 
collection as shown in the ``Supplementary Information'' section below 
or, if there is no OMB control number, the Title as shown in the 
``Supplementary Information'' section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information or copies 
of the information collection, contact Cathy Williams at 202-418-2918, 
or via Internet at Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov, and/or PRA@fcc.gov. To view 
a copy of this information collection request (ICR) submitted to OMB: 
(1) Go to the Web page https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain, (2) 
look for the section of the Web page called ``Currently Under Review,'' 
(3) click on the downward-pointing arrow in the ``Select Agency'' box 
below the ``Currently Under Review'' heading, (4) select ``Federal 
Communications Commission'' from the list of agencies presented in the 
``Select Agency'' box, (5) click the ``Submit'' button to the right of 
the ``Select Agency'' box, (6) when the list of FCC ICRs currently 
under review appears, look for the OMB control number of this ICR you 
want to review (or its Title if there is no OMB control number) and 
then click on the ICR Reference Number. A copy of the FCC submission to 
OMB will be displayed.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    OMB Control Number: 3060-0463.
    Title: Telecommunications Relay Services and Speech-to-Speech 
Services for Individuals with Hearing and Speech Disabilities, Report 
and Order and Declaratory Ruling, CG Docket No. 03-123, FCC 07-186.
    Form Number: N/A.
    Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit entities; State, local or 
tribal government.
    Number of Respondents and Responses: 5,045 respondents; 5,211 
responses.
    Estimated Time per Response: 10-15 hours.
    Frequency of Response: Annual reporting requirement; Recordkeeping 
requirement; Third Party Disclosure.
    Total Annual Burden: 27,412 hours.
    Total Annual Cost: None.
    Obligation to Respond: Required to obtain or retain benefit. The 
statutory authority can be found at section 225 of the Communications 
Act, 47 U.S.C. 225. The law was enacted on July 26, 1990, as Title IV 
of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 101-336, 104 
Stat. 327.
    Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: An assurance of 
confidentiality is not offered because this information collection does 
not require the collection of personally identifiable information from 
individuals.
    Privacy Impact Assessment: No impact(s).
    Needs and Uses: On November 19, 2007, the Commission released the 
Telecommunications Relay Services and Speech-to-Speech Services for 
Individuals with Hearing and Speech Disabilities, Report and Order and 
Declaratory Ruling (2007 TRS Cost Recovery Order), CG Docket No. 03-
123, FCC 07-186, adopting (1) A new cost recovery methodology for 
interstate traditional Telecommunications Relay Services (TRS) and 
interstate Speech-to-Speech (STS) based on the Muliti-state Average 
Rate Structure (MARS) plan proposed by Hamilton Relay, Inc., (2) a new 
cost recovery methodology for interstate captioned telephone service 
(CTS) and interstate and intrastate Internet-Protocol (IP) Captioned 
Telephone Service (IP CTS) based on the MARS plan, (3) a cost recovery 
methodology for IP Relay based on price caps, and (4) a cost recovery 
methodology for Video Relay Services (VRS) that adopts tiered rates 
based on call volume. The 2007 TRS Cost Recovery Order also clarifies 
the nature and extent that certain categories of costs are compensable 
from the Interstate TRS Fund (Fund), and addresses certain issues 
concerning the management and oversight of the Fund, including 
financial incentives offered to consumers to make relay calls and the 
role of the Interstate TRS Fund Advisory Council.
    The 2007 TRS Cost Recovery Order establishes reporting requirements 
associated with the MARS plan cost recovery methodology for 
compensation from the Fund. Specifically, TRS providers must submit to 
the Fund administrator the following information annually, on a per-
state basis, regarding the previous calendar year: (1) The per-minute 
compensation rate(s) for intrastate traditional TRS, STS and CTS, (2) 
whether the rate applies to session minutes or conversation minutes, 
(3) the number of intrastate session minutes for traditional TRS, STS 
and CTS, and (4) the number of intrastate conversation minutes for 
traditional TRS, STS, and CTS. Also, STS providers must file a report 
annually with the Fund administrator and the Commission on their 
specific outreach efforts directly attributable to the additional 
compensation approved by the Commission for STS outreach.
    In the 2007 TRS Cost Recovery Order, the Commission has assessed 
the effects of imposing the submission of rate data, and has found that 
there is no increased administrative burden on businesses with fewer 
than 25 employees. The Commission recognizes that the required rate 
data is presently available with the states and the providers of 
interstate traditional TRS, interstate STS, and interstate CTS, thereby 
no additional step is required to produce such data. The Commission 
therefore believes that the submission of the rate data does not 
increase an administrative burden on businesses.

 Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-13526 Filed 6-13-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.