Revision to United States Marshals Service Fees for Services, 33955-33957 [E8-13437]
Download as PDF
33955
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 116 / Monday, June 16, 2008 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 10.—CREDIT SUBSIDY RATES BY LTV AND FICO SCORE
[In percent]
FICO score range
Loan-to-value ratio
850–680
679–640
639–620
619–600
599–560
559–500
499–300
¥2.95
¥2.56
¥2.22
¥0.20
¥1.89
¥1.08
¥0.18
3.73
¥2.00
¥0.94
¥0.04
4.07
¥0.69
0.90
2.49
8.97
¥0.54
1.26
2.88
9.57
¥0.01
2.62
4.80
12.63
2.41
6.70
10.74
20.41
LE 90 ................................................................
90–95 ...............................................................
95–97 ...............................................................
SFDPA* ............................................................
None
0.10
1.65
3.37
10.12
* Loans with seller-funded downpayment assistance.
TABLE 11.—BREAKEVEN UP-FRONT AND ANNUAL INSURANCE PREMIUMS FOR SELLER-FUNDED DOWNPAYMENT
ASSISTANCE LOANS
[In percent]
FICO score range
850–680
679–640
639–620
619–600
599–560
559–500
499–300
0.95
0.55
5.56
0.55
5.99
0.55
5.92
2.00
6.88
2.00
12.09
2.00
28.95
2.00
Up-front Premium .............................................
Annual Premium ..............................................
[FR Doc. 08–1356 Filed 6–11–08; 2:56 pm]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
28 CFR Part 0
[Docket No. USMS 102; AG Order No. 2974–
2008]
RIN 1105–AB14
Revision to United States Marshals
Service Fees for Services
United States Marshals Service,
Department of Justice.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
This rule proposes to increase
the fee from $45 per person per hour to
$55 per person per hour for process
served or executed personally by a
United States Marshals Service
employee, agent, or contractor. This
proposed fee increase reflects the
current costs to the United States
Marshals Service for service of process
in federal court proceedings.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before August 15, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Please submit written
comments to the Office of General
Counsel, United States Marshals
Service, Washington, DC 20530–1000.
To ensure proper handling, please
reference Docket No. USMS 102 on your
correspondence.
Comments may also be submitted
electronically to: usmsregs@usdoj.gov or
to https://www.regulations.gov by using
the electronic comment form provided
on that site. Comments submitted
electronically must include Docket No.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:04 Jun 13, 2008
Jkt 214001
USMS 102 in the subject box. You may
also view an electronic version of this
rule at the https://www.regulations.gov
site.
Comments are also available for
public inspection at the Office of
General Counsel by calling (202) 307–
9054 to arrange for an appointment.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joe
Lazar, Associate General Counsel,
United States Marshals Service,
Washington, DC 20530–1000, telephone
number (202) 307–9054.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Legal Authority for the U.S. Marshals
Service To Charge Fees
The Attorney General must establish
fees to be taxed and collected for certain
services rendered by the U.S. Marshals
Service in connection with federal court
proceedings. 28 U.S.C. 1921(b). These
services include, but are not limited to,
serving writs, subpoenas, or
summonses, preparing notices or bills of
sale, keeping attached property, and
certain necessary travel. 28 U.S.C.
1921(a). To the extent practicable, these
fees shall reflect the actual and
reasonable costs of the services
provided. 28 U.S.C. 1921(b).
The Attorney General initially
established the fee schedule in 1991
based on the actual costs, e.g., salaries,
overhead, etc., of the services rendered
and the hours expended at that time. 56
FR 2436 (Jan. 23, 1991). Due to an
increase in the salaries and benefits of
U.S. Marshals Service personnel over
time, the initial fee schedule was
amended in 2000. 65 FR 47859 (Aug. 4,
2000). The current fee schedule is
inadequate and no longer reflects the
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
None
7.77
2.00
actual and reasonable costs of the
services rendered.
Federal Cost Accounting and Fee
Setting Standards and Guidelines Being
Used
When developing fees for services, the
U.S. Marshals Service adheres to the
principles contained in Office of
Management and Budget Circular No.
A–25 Revised (‘‘Circular No. A–25’’).
Circular No. A–25 states that, as a
general policy, a ‘‘user charge * * *
will be assessed against each
identifiable recipient for special benefits
derived from Federal activities beyond
those received by the general public.’’
Id. § 6.
The U.S. Marshals Service follows the
guidance contained in Circular No. A–
25 to the extent that it is not
inconsistent with any federal statute.
Specific legislative authority to charge
fees for services takes precedence over
Circular No. A–25 when the statute
‘‘prohibits the assessment of a user
charge on a service or addresses an
aspect of the user charge (e.g., who pays
the charge; how much is the charge;
where collections are deposited).’’ Id.
§ 4(b). When a statute does not address
issues of how to calculate fees or what
costs to include in fee calculations,
Circular No. A–25 instructs that its
principles and guidance should be
followed ‘‘to the extent permitted by
law.’’ Id. According to Circular No. A–
25, federal agencies should charge the
full cost or the market price of providing
services that provide a special benefit to
identifiable recipients. Id. § 6. Circular
No. A–25 defines full cost as including
‘‘all direct and indirect costs to any part
of the Federal Government of providing
E:\FR\FM\16JNP1.SGM
16JNP1
33956
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 116 / Monday, June 16, 2008 / Proposed Rules
a good, resource, or service. These costs
include, but are not limited to, an
appropriate share of’’:
• Direct or indirect personnel costs,
including salaries and fringe benefits
such as medical insurance and
retirement;
• Physical overhead, consulting, and
other indirect costs including material
and supply costs, utilities, insurance,
travel, and rents or imputed rents on
land, buildings, and equipment;
• The management and supervisory
costs; and
• The costs of enforcement,
collection, research, establishment of
standards, and regulation. Id. § 6(d).
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
Processes Used To Determine the
Amount of the Fee Revision
The Attorney General initially
established the fee schedule in 1991
based on the average salaries, benefits,
and overhead of the Deputy U.S.
Marshals who executed process on
behalf of a requesting party. The fee
schedule was revised in 2000. The 2000
rates, which still currently are charged
are:
(1) For process forwarded for service
from one U.S Marshals Service office or
suboffice to another—$8 per item
forwarded;
(2) For process served by mail—$8 per
item mailed;
(3) For process served or executed
personally—$45 per hour (or portion
thereof) for each item served by one U.S.
Marshals Service employee, agent, or
contractor, plus travel costs and any
other out-of-pocket expenses. For each
additional U.S. Marshals Service
employee, agent, or contractor who is
needed to serve process—$45 per
person per hour for each item served,
plus travel costs and any other out-ofpocket expenses.
(4) For copies at the request of any
party—$.10 per page;
(5) For preparing notice of sale, bill of
sale, or U.S. Marshal deed—$20 per
item;
(6) For keeping and advertisement of
property attached—actual expenses
incurred in seizing, maintaining, and
disposing of the property.
In 2007, the U.S. Marshals Service
conducted an analysis to determine
whether, in light of the increase in
salaries and expenses of its workforce
over the previous seven-year time
period, the existing fee schedule
continued to reflect the costs of serving
process. The following cost module was
designed to reflect the average hourly
cost of serving process in person on
behalf of a requesting party.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:04 Jun 13, 2008
Jkt 214001
revenue that would be collected under
the current fee structure. This revenue
increase represents a recovery of costs
Hourly Wage .................................
$33.00 based on an increase in salaries,
Fringe Benefits .............................
14.18
expenses, and employee benefits over
Indirect Costs ................................
10.28
the previous seven-year period.
The economic impact on individual
Total Personnel Costs ...........
57.46
entities that utilize the services of the
U.S. Marshals Service will be minimal.
The hourly wage was determined by
The service of process fees only will
dividing the annual salary, including
affect entities that pursue litigation in
locality pay, of the average Deputy U.S.
federal court and, in most instances,
Marshal in 2007 who served process
seek to have the U.S. Marshals levy
into the Deputy’s total work hours for
upon or seize property. The service of
the year. The cost of Law Enforcement
process fees will be increased by only
Availability Pay also was factored into
$10 per hour from the previous rate
the hourly wage of an average Deputy
increase seven years ago. The fees will
U.S. Marshal.1 The fringe benefits rate
be consonant with similar fees already
reflected 43 percent of wage costs.
paid by these entities in state court
Finally, the indirect costs, which
litigation.
reflected the costs of administrative
services, including management/
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
supervisory compensation and benefits,
1995
depreciation, utilities, supplies, and
This proposed rule will not result in
equipment, comprised approximately 22
the expenditure by State, local, and
percent of the total wage and benefits
costs. As a result of the cost module, the tribal governments, in the aggregate, or
by the private sector, of $100 million or
U.S. Marshals Service determined that
more in any one year, and it will not
the existing fee schedule no longer
reflected the actual and reasonable costs significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. Therefore, no actions were
of serving process.
deemed necessary under the provisions
The total personnel costs of serving
of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
process were rounded to the nearest
of 1995.
five-dollar increment. Thus, in order to
recover the actual and reasonable costs
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
of serving process, the U.S. Marshals
Fairness Act of 1996
Service is proposing to charge $55 per
This proposed rule is not a major rule
hour (or portion thereof) for each item
as defined by section 251 of the Small
served by one Deputy U.S. Marshal.
Business Regulatory Enforcement
This represents a 20 percent increase
Fairness Act of 1996. 5 U.S.C. 804. This
($10 per hour) from the existing fee for
rule will not result in an annual effect
serving process revised in 2000.
on the economy of $100 million or
Regulatory Flexibility Act
more; a major increase in costs or prices;
The Attorney General, in accordance
or significant adverse effects on
with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
competition, employment, investment,
U.S.C. 605(b)), has reviewed this
productivity, innovation, or on the
proposed rule and, by approving it,
ability of United States-based
certifies that this rule will not have a
companies to compete with foreignsignificant economic impact on a
based companies in domestic and
substantial number of small entities.
export markets.
Under the current fee structure, the U.S.
Executive Order 12866
Marshals Service collected
This proposed rule has been drafted
$1,610,552.72 in service of process fees
in FY 2007.2 The implementation of this and reviewed in accordance with
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory
proposed rule will provide the U.S.
Planning and Review), section 1(b)
Marshals Service with an estimated
additional $325,000 in revenue over the (Principles of Regulation). The
Department of Justice has determined
1 The Law Enforcement Availability Pay Act of
that this proposed rule is a ‘‘significant
1994, Pub. L. No. 103–329, § 633, 108 Stat. 2425
regulatory action’’ under Executive
(1994) (codified at 5 U.S.C. 5545a), provides that
Order 12866, section 3(f), and,
law enforcement officers, such as Deputy U.S.
accordingly, this rule has been reviewed
Marshals, who are required to work unscheduled
by the Office of Management and
hours in excess of each regular work day, are
entitled to a 25% premium pay in addition to their
Budget.
Cost
module
base salary.
2 This amount does not include $534,518 in U.S.
Marshal commissions collected and the recovery of
out-of-pocket expenses for sales during FY 2007.
This proposed rule does not affect commissions,
only the fees charged for service of process.
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Executive Order 13132
This proposed rule will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
E:\FR\FM\16JNP1.SGM
16JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 116 / Monday, June 16, 2008 / Proposed Rules
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with section 6 of Executive
Order 13132, the Department of Justice
has determined that this rule does not
have sufficient federalism implications
to warrant the preparation of a
federalism summary impact statement.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule meets the
applicable standards set forth in
sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988 concerning civil justice
reform.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This proposed rule does not contain
collection of information requirements
and would not be subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, as
amended (44 U.S.C. 3501–20).
List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 0
Authority delegations (Government
agencies), Government employees,
Organization and functions
(Government agencies), Whistleblowing.
Accordingly, Title 28, Part 0, Subpart
T of the Code of Federal Regulations is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 0—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 0
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 28 U.S.C. 509,
510, 515–519.
§ 0.114
[Amended]
2. In § 0.114, paragraph (a)(3) is
amended by removing the fee ‘‘$45’’ and
adding the fee ‘‘$55’’ in its place
wherever it occurs.
Dated: June 5, 2008.
Michael B. Mukasey,
Attorney General.
[FR Doc. E8–13437 Filed 6–13–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Bureau of Prisons
28 CFR Part 549
[BOP–1088–P]
RIN 1120–AB20
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
Psychiatric Evaluation and Treatment
Bureau of Prisons, Justice.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: In this document, the Bureau
of Prisons (Bureau) proposes to revise
its regulations on providing psychiatric
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:04 Jun 13, 2008
Jkt 214001
treatment and medication to inmates.
We propose these revised regulations to
clarify and update the regulations in
light of more recent caselaw.
DATES: Comments are due by August 15,
2008.
ADDRESSES: Our e-mail address is
BOPRULES@BOP.GOV. Comments
should be submitted to the Rules Unit,
Office of General Counsel, Bureau of
Prisons, 320 First Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20534. You may view
an electronic version of this regulation
at https://www.regulations.gov. You may
also comment via the Internet to BOP at
BOPRULES@BOP.GOV or by using the
www.regulations.gov comment form for
this regulation. When submitting
comments electronically you must
include the BOP Docket No. in the
subject box.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sarah Qureshi, Office of General
Counsel, Bureau of Prisons, phone (202)
307–2105.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Bureau proposes to revise its regulations
on providing psychiatric treatment and
medication to inmates. We published a
proposed regulation document on this
subject in the Federal Register on
December 29, 2003 (68 FR 74892). We
now withdraw that proposed regulation
document and propose these revised
regulations.
First, we rename the subpart
‘‘Psychiatric Evaluation and Treatment’’
to more accurately reflect the substance
of the regulations. The previous title,
‘‘Administrative Safeguards for
Psychiatric Treatment and Medication,’’
did not reflect the Bureau’s ability to
conduct psychiatric evaluations before
involuntary hospitalization in a suitable
facility for care and treatment.
Below, we provide a section-bysection analysis of the proposed
regulations.
Section 549.40 Purpose and scope.
This section states that the purpose of
the subpart is to describe procedures for
voluntary and involuntary psychiatric
evaluation, hospitalization, care, and
treatment, in a suitable facility for
persons in Bureau custody. These
procedures are authorized by 18 U.S.C.
Chapter 313 and 18 U.S.C. 4042.
Current 28 CFR 549.43 refers to Title
18 U.S.C. 4241–4247, which comprised
Chapter 313. The Adam Walsh Child
Protection and Safety Act of 2006 (Pub.
L. 109–248) (Walsh Act), enacted on
July 27, 2006, amended title 18 of the
United States Code, Chapter 313, to add
a new section 4248, related to sexual
offenders. We therefore refer now to 18
U.S.C. Chapter 313 as a whole, instead
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
33957
of referring to specific sections of the
statute.
This section also notes that this
subpart applies to inmates in Bureau
custody as defined by 28 CFR part 500,
specifically § 500.1(c), which defines
inmates as ‘‘all persons in the custody
of the Federal Bureau of Prisons or
Bureau contract facilities, including
persons charged with or convicted of
offenses against the United States; D.C.
Code felony offenders; and persons held
as witnesses, detainees, or otherwise.’’
Section 549.41 Hospitalization in a
suitable facility. This section explains
that, as used in 18 U.S.C. Chapter 313
and this subpart, ‘‘hospitalization in a
suitable facility’’ includes the Bureau’s
designation of inmates to medical
referral centers or correctional
institutions which provide the required
care or treatment.
Section 549.42 Use of psychiatric
medications. This section describes how
psychiatric medications will be used.
Psychiatric medications will only be
used for treatment of diagnosable
mental illnesses and disorders, and their
symptoms, for which such medication is
accepted treatment, and that psychiatric
medication will be administered only
after following the applicable
procedures in this subpart. This section
is derived from current § 549.40.
In this regulation, we clarify that
psychiatric medication is to be used
only for a diagnosable psychiatric
disorder or symptoms for which such
medication is accepted treatment.
Previously, the regulation allowed
medication for ‘‘symptomatic behavior.’’
The word ‘‘symptoms’’ is more accurate
medical terminology.
Section 549.43 Transfer for
psychiatric or psychological
examination. This section describes the
Bureau’s transfer authority. Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Chapter 229, Subchapter C
(§ 3621(b)), the Bureau is authorized to
transfer inmates between facilities.
Accordingly, the Bureau may transfer an
inmate to a suitable facility for
psychiatric or psychological
examination to determine whether
hospitalization in a suitable facility for
psychiatric care or treatment is needed.
Section 549.44 Voluntary
hospitalization in a suitable facility for
psychiatric care or treatment, and
voluntary administration of psychiatric
medication. This section derives from
current § 549.41. In this section, we
state that an inmate may be hospitalized
in a suitable facility for psychiatric care
or treatment after providing informed
and voluntary consent when, in the
professional medical judgment of
qualified health services staff, such care
or treatment is required and prescribed.
E:\FR\FM\16JNP1.SGM
16JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 116 (Monday, June 16, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 33955-33957]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-13437]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
28 CFR Part 0
[Docket No. USMS 102; AG Order No. 2974-2008]
RIN 1105-AB14
Revision to United States Marshals Service Fees for Services
AGENCY: United States Marshals Service, Department of Justice.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule proposes to increase the fee from $45 per person per
hour to $55 per person per hour for process served or executed
personally by a United States Marshals Service employee, agent, or
contractor. This proposed fee increase reflects the current costs to
the United States Marshals Service for service of process in federal
court proceedings.
DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before August 15, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Please submit written comments to the Office of General
Counsel, United States Marshals Service, Washington, DC 20530-1000. To
ensure proper handling, please reference Docket No. USMS 102 on your
correspondence.
Comments may also be submitted electronically to:
usmsregs@usdoj.gov or to https://www.regulations.gov by using the
electronic comment form provided on that site. Comments submitted
electronically must include Docket No. USMS 102 in the subject box. You
may also view an electronic version of this rule at the https://
www.regulations.gov site.
Comments are also available for public inspection at the Office of
General Counsel by calling (202) 307-9054 to arrange for an
appointment.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joe Lazar, Associate General Counsel,
United States Marshals Service, Washington, DC 20530-1000, telephone
number (202) 307-9054.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Legal Authority for the U.S. Marshals Service To Charge Fees
The Attorney General must establish fees to be taxed and collected
for certain services rendered by the U.S. Marshals Service in
connection with federal court proceedings. 28 U.S.C. 1921(b). These
services include, but are not limited to, serving writs, subpoenas, or
summonses, preparing notices or bills of sale, keeping attached
property, and certain necessary travel. 28 U.S.C. 1921(a). To the
extent practicable, these fees shall reflect the actual and reasonable
costs of the services provided. 28 U.S.C. 1921(b).
The Attorney General initially established the fee schedule in 1991
based on the actual costs, e.g., salaries, overhead, etc., of the
services rendered and the hours expended at that time. 56 FR 2436 (Jan.
23, 1991). Due to an increase in the salaries and benefits of U.S.
Marshals Service personnel over time, the initial fee schedule was
amended in 2000. 65 FR 47859 (Aug. 4, 2000). The current fee schedule
is inadequate and no longer reflects the actual and reasonable costs of
the services rendered.
Federal Cost Accounting and Fee Setting Standards and Guidelines Being
Used
When developing fees for services, the U.S. Marshals Service
adheres to the principles contained in Office of Management and Budget
Circular No. A-25 Revised (``Circular No. A-25''). Circular No. A-25
states that, as a general policy, a ``user charge * * * will be
assessed against each identifiable recipient for special benefits
derived from Federal activities beyond those received by the general
public.'' Id. Sec. 6.
The U.S. Marshals Service follows the guidance contained in
Circular No. A-25 to the extent that it is not inconsistent with any
federal statute. Specific legislative authority to charge fees for
services takes precedence over Circular No. A-25 when the statute
``prohibits the assessment of a user charge on a service or addresses
an aspect of the user charge (e.g., who pays the charge; how much is
the charge; where collections are deposited).'' Id. Sec. 4(b). When a
statute does not address issues of how to calculate fees or what costs
to include in fee calculations, Circular No. A-25 instructs that its
principles and guidance should be followed ``to the extent permitted by
law.'' Id. According to Circular No. A-25, federal agencies should
charge the full cost or the market price of providing services that
provide a special benefit to identifiable recipients. Id. Sec. 6.
Circular No. A-25 defines full cost as including ``all direct and
indirect costs to any part of the Federal Government of providing
[[Page 33956]]
a good, resource, or service. These costs include, but are not limited
to, an appropriate share of'':
Direct or indirect personnel costs, including salaries and
fringe benefits such as medical insurance and retirement;
Physical overhead, consulting, and other indirect costs
including material and supply costs, utilities, insurance, travel, and
rents or imputed rents on land, buildings, and equipment;
The management and supervisory costs; and
The costs of enforcement, collection, research,
establishment of standards, and regulation. Id. Sec. 6(d).
Processes Used To Determine the Amount of the Fee Revision
The Attorney General initially established the fee schedule in 1991
based on the average salaries, benefits, and overhead of the Deputy
U.S. Marshals who executed process on behalf of a requesting party. The
fee schedule was revised in 2000. The 2000 rates, which still currently
are charged are:
(1) For process forwarded for service from one U.S Marshals Service
office or suboffice to another--$8 per item forwarded;
(2) For process served by mail--$8 per item mailed;
(3) For process served or executed personally--$45 per hour (or
portion thereof) for each item served by one U.S. Marshals Service
employee, agent, or contractor, plus travel costs and any other out-of-
pocket expenses. For each additional U.S. Marshals Service employee,
agent, or contractor who is needed to serve process--$45 per person per
hour for each item served, plus travel costs and any other out-of-
pocket expenses.
(4) For copies at the request of any party--$.10 per page;
(5) For preparing notice of sale, bill of sale, or U.S. Marshal
deed--$20 per item;
(6) For keeping and advertisement of property attached--actual
expenses incurred in seizing, maintaining, and disposing of the
property.
In 2007, the U.S. Marshals Service conducted an analysis to
determine whether, in light of the increase in salaries and expenses of
its workforce over the previous seven-year time period, the existing
fee schedule continued to reflect the costs of serving process. The
following cost module was designed to reflect the average hourly cost
of serving process in person on behalf of a requesting party.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost
module
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hourly Wage.................................................. $33.00
Fringe Benefits.............................................. 14.18
Indirect Costs............................................... 10.28
----------
Total Personnel Costs.................................... 57.46
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The hourly wage was determined by dividing the annual salary,
including locality pay, of the average Deputy U.S. Marshal in 2007 who
served process into the Deputy's total work hours for the year. The
cost of Law Enforcement Availability Pay also was factored into the
hourly wage of an average Deputy U.S. Marshal.\1\ The fringe benefits
rate reflected 43 percent of wage costs. Finally, the indirect costs,
which reflected the costs of administrative services, including
management/supervisory compensation and benefits, depreciation,
utilities, supplies, and equipment, comprised approximately 22 percent
of the total wage and benefits costs. As a result of the cost module,
the U.S. Marshals Service determined that the existing fee schedule no
longer reflected the actual and reasonable costs of serving process.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Law Enforcement Availability Pay Act of 1994, Pub. L.
No. 103-329, Sec. 633, 108 Stat. 2425 (1994) (codified at 5 U.S.C.
5545a), provides that law enforcement officers, such as Deputy U.S.
Marshals, who are required to work unscheduled hours in excess of
each regular work day, are entitled to a 25% premium pay in addition
to their base salary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The total personnel costs of serving process were rounded to the
nearest five-dollar increment. Thus, in order to recover the actual and
reasonable costs of serving process, the U.S. Marshals Service is
proposing to charge $55 per hour (or portion thereof) for each item
served by one Deputy U.S. Marshal. This represents a 20 percent
increase ($10 per hour) from the existing fee for serving process
revised in 2000.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Attorney General, in accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), has reviewed this proposed rule and, by
approving it, certifies that this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Under the
current fee structure, the U.S. Marshals Service collected
$1,610,552.72 in service of process fees in FY 2007.\2\ The
implementation of this proposed rule will provide the U.S. Marshals
Service with an estimated additional $325,000 in revenue over the
revenue that would be collected under the current fee structure. This
revenue increase represents a recovery of costs based on an increase in
salaries, expenses, and employee benefits over the previous seven-year
period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ This amount does not include $534,518 in U.S. Marshal
commissions collected and the recovery of out-of-pocket expenses for
sales during FY 2007. This proposed rule does not affect
commissions, only the fees charged for service of process.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The economic impact on individual entities that utilize the
services of the U.S. Marshals Service will be minimal. The service of
process fees only will affect entities that pursue litigation in
federal court and, in most instances, seek to have the U.S. Marshals
levy upon or seize property. The service of process fees will be
increased by only $10 per hour from the previous rate increase seven
years ago. The fees will be consonant with similar fees already paid by
these entities in state court litigation.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This proposed rule will not result in the expenditure by State,
local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private
sector, of $100 million or more in any one year, and it will not
significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no
actions were deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This proposed rule is not a major rule as defined by section 251 of
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. 5
U.S.C. 804. This rule will not result in an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more; a major increase in costs or prices;
or significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreign-based companies in domestic and
export markets.
Executive Order 12866
This proposed rule has been drafted and reviewed in accordance with
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review), section 1(b)
(Principles of Regulation). The Department of Justice has determined
that this proposed rule is a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866, section 3(f), and, accordingly, this rule has
been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
Executive Order 13132
This proposed rule will not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national
[[Page 33957]]
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with section 6 of Executive Order 13132, the Department of
Justice has determined that this rule does not have sufficient
federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a federalism
summary impact statement.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule meets the applicable standards set forth in
sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988 concerning civil
justice reform.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This proposed rule does not contain collection of information
requirements and would not be subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1980, as amended (44 U.S.C. 3501-20).
List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 0
Authority delegations (Government agencies), Government employees,
Organization and functions (Government agencies), Whistleblowing.
Accordingly, Title 28, Part 0, Subpart T of the Code of Federal
Regulations is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 0--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 0 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 28 U.S.C. 509, 510, 515-519.
Sec. 0.114 [Amended]
2. In Sec. 0.114, paragraph (a)(3) is amended by removing the fee
``$45'' and adding the fee ``$55'' in its place wherever it occurs.
Dated: June 5, 2008.
Michael B. Mukasey,
Attorney General.
[FR Doc. E8-13437 Filed 6-13-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-04-P