Procedures for Transportation Workplace Drug and Alcohol Testing Programs: State Laws Requiring Drug and Alcohol Rule Violation Information, 33735-33737 [E8-13377]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 115 / Friday, June 13, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
announcing the completion of band
reconfiguration in that region.
(ii) Five years after the release of a
public notice announcing the
completion of band reconfiguration in a
given 800 MHz NPSPAC region, the
channels listed in paragraph (c)(12) of
this section will revert back to their
original pool categories.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E8–13352 Filed 6–12–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
49 CFR Part 40
[Docket OST–2008–0184]
RIN OST 2105–AD67
Procedures for Transportation
Workplace Drug and Alcohol Testing
Programs: State Laws Requiring Drug
and Alcohol Rule Violation Information
Office of the Secretary, DOT.
Interim final rule.
AGENCY:
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Office of the Secretary
(OST) is amending its drug and alcohol
testing procedures to authorize
employers to disclose to State
commercial driver licensing (CDL)
authorities the drug and alcohol
violations of employees who hold CDLs
and operate commercial motor vehicles
(CMVs), when a State law requires such
reporting. This rule also permits thirdparty administrators (TPAs) to provide
the same information to State CDL
licensing authorities where State law
requires the TPAs to do so for owneroperator CMV drivers with CDLs.
DATES: The rule is effective June 13,
2008. Comments to this interim final
rule should be submitted by August 12,
2008. Late-filed comments will be
considered to the extent practicable.
ADDRESSES: You may file comments
identified by the docket number DOT–
OST–2008–0184 by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Ave., SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Ave., SE., between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m. ET, Monday through
Friday, except Federal Holidays.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:26 Jun 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
Instructions: You must include the
agency name and docket number DOT–
OST–2008–0184 or the Regulatory
Identification Number (RIN) for the
rulemaking at the beginning of your
comment. All comments received will
be posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
program issues, Bohdan Baczara or
Patrice M. Kelly, Office of Drug and
Alcohol Policy and Compliance, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590; (202) 366–3784 (voice), (202)
366–3897 (fax),
bohdan.baczara@dot.gov or
patrice.kelly@dot.gov (e-mail). For legal
issues, Robert C. Ashby, Deputy
Assistant General Counsel for
Regulations and Enforcement, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC
20590; (202) 366–9310 (voice), (202)
366–9313 (fax) or bob.ashby@dot.gov
(e-mail).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Confidentiality of an employee’s test
results is a cornerstone of the balance
between public safety and employee
privacy that is crucial to the Department
of Transportation’s testing program.
Early in the Department of
Transportation’s drug testing program,
we recognized the need for
confidentiality of employee testing
information and reflected this in our
December 1, 1989 Federal Register
notice (54 FR 49854). This rule required
the Medical Review Officer (MRO) to
disclose positive drug test result
information only to employers. The rule
also required laboratories to maintain
employee test records in confidence, but
permitted laboratories to disclose a
positive drug test result to the
employee, employer, or the decision
maker in a lawsuit, grievance or other
proceeding initiated by or on behalf of
the employee as a result of the
employee’s positive drug test.
Congress passed the Omnibus
Transportation Employee Testing Act of
1991, which directed the Department to
implement significant changes to its
substance abuse testing program, and
specifically referenced providing for the
confidentiality of employee test results.
The Department amended its drug and
alcohol testing regulations to implement
these statutory requirements. (59 FR
7340; February 15, 1994). As provided
in the original 1989 DOT rules and the
1994 amendments, Part 40 includes
strict and specific provisions for
maintaining the confidentiality of
employee testing records. Specifically,
employers are permitted to release
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
33735
employee drug and alcohol testing
records to other employers only upon
written consent from the employee, and
only when the consent authorized the
release to a specifically identified
individual.
In 2000, the Department revised its
drug and alcohol testing regulations (65
FR 79462). In this revision, the
Department prohibited MROs from
disclosing employee drug testing
information to other employers and
prohibited service agents and employers
from using blanket releases. We
intended in 2000 for State safety
agencies with regulatory authority over
employers to be provided with certain
testing information about an individual
employee with no signed releases
necessary. In recent years, several States
have passed legislation requiring the
release of certain test result and refusal
information for all CDL holders without
the employees’ consent. Specifically,
the States have required employers and/
or their service agents to report to their
respective State CDL issuing and
licensing authorities the drug and
alcohol violations of employees who are
CMV drivers with CDLs. We do not
want our regulations to have the effect
of prohibiting employers and TPAs of
owner-operators from providing the
drug and alcohol test results of CMV
drivers with CDLs. Consequently, the
Department must take rapid action to
avoid any such conflict.
The Department believes that State
action to suspend or revoke the CDLs of
CMV drivers who violate DOT rules
until they demonstrate that they have
successfully completed the SAP process
can have important safety benefits. We
support State legislation that can
reliably provide State CDL licensing
authorities with the information they
need to take such action. In particular,
the Department is concerned that, in the
absence of such action, CMV drivers
with CDLs who do not seek required
Substance Abuse Professional (SAP)
evaluations, yet continue to perform
safety-sensitive duties after they violate
the Department’s drug and alcohol
regulations (so-called ‘‘job hoppers’’),
pose an unacceptable safety risk to the
public. We believe measures taken by
States to suspend or revoke the CDL
licenses of CMV drivers who violate
DOT drug and alcohol rules will
enhance the Department’s efforts to
ensure that such drivers are evaluated
by SAPs and receive treatment or
education before they resume safetysensitive duties.
To be consistent with our policy in
enforcing the existing regulations and
because we want to ensure that 49 CFR
Part 40 is supportive of such State
E:\FR\FM\13JNR1.SGM
13JNR1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
33736
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 115 / Friday, June 13, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
legislation, we are acting at this time to
amend section 40.331. This amendment
specifies that employers are authorized
to respond—without conflict with Part
40 confidentiality requirements—to
State law requirements by providing
drug and alcohol violation information
to State CDL licensing authorities on all
CMV drivers with CDLs who are
covered by DOT testing rules. This same
authorization applies to TPAs for
owner-operators, since they are the
party in the best position to provide this
data if owner-operators choose not to
report their own violations. We note
that this amendment does not authorize
the release of individually identifiable
testing information outside the scope of
the State laws requiring its provision to
a State agency for safety purposes. For
example, if a State statute requires
employers to provide information on
positive tests and refusals to the DMV
for purposes of taking action against the
driver’s CDL, it would be improper for
the DMV to release the test information
to other third parties without the
written consent of the driver.
An employer, or a TPA for an owneroperator, is in the best position to
provide this information reliably to
State authorities because it is the only
entity with knowledge and information
about all drug and alcohol violations for
an employee. For example, an MRO will
not necessarily know that an employee
refused to go to the collection site. Since
MROs are not involved in the alcohol
testing process, MROs will not have any
information concerning an alcohol test.
Likewise, a breath alcohol technician
will not have any information about an
employee’s drug test result. A SAP will
have no records on an employee who
has not sought evaluation and treatment
after a rule violation. Many service
agents are located out of State and may
not know of a State law requirement,
and in any case they may not be readily
subject to State law jurisdiction. Most
have no way of knowing whether the
employee is a CMV driver with a CDL
or which DOT agency regulates the
employee. Employers, on the other
hand, have all this information, and are
in-State employers subject to the State’s
jurisdiction.
This amendment is not a mandate to
employers or TPAs for owner-operators
to send information to State authorities.
It simply authorizes them to comply
with the specifics of State information
collection requirements. For example, if
State A requires only positive drug tests
to be transmitted to its Department of
Motor Vehicles, an employer or TPA
could provide only records of the
employee’s positive drug test without
written employee consent. The
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:26 Jun 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
employer or TPA could not provide
‘‘blanket’’ information about refusals or
alcohol tests to State A without written
employee consent, since this was not
required by State law. We note that
enforcement of State laws that apply to
a given employer or TPA would remain
a State responsibility.
Regulatory Analyses and Notices
Authority
The statutory authority for this rule
derives from the Omnibus
Transportation Employee Testing Act of
1991 (49 U.S.C. 102, 301, 322, 5331,
20140, 31306, and 45101 et seq.) and the
Department of Transportation Act (49
U.S.C. 322).
Administrative Procedure Act
The Department has determined that
this rule may be issued without a prior
opportunity for notice and comment
because providing prior notice and
comment would be unnecessary,
impracticable, or contrary to the public
interest. Because several States already
have laws requiring the reporting of test
result information and other States may
be contemplating enacting such laws, it
is important to clarify the status of
employers and TPAs for owneroperators seeking to comply with these
laws. As States work with drug testing
program participants to implement their
laws, it is essential that the Department
work, without delay, to avoid any
potential conflicts with Federal
regulations that could impede such
employers and TPAs from providing
needed information to State agencies. It
is important to resolve, as soon as
possible, questions that States and other
participants have already raised about
the relationship of State law and DOT
regulations in this area. Issuing the
interim final rule should help to avoid
confusion that could, to some extent,
diminish the safety benefits that the
combination of Federal and State
requirements concerning persons who
violate drug testing rules would
otherwise have.
This rule clarifies that, in the interest
of safety, employers and TPAs for
owner-operators may comply with State
reporting requirements to disclose to
their State CDL authorities the DOT
drug and alcohol violations of CMV
drivers with CDLs. It would be
inadvisable for the Department to delay
issuing this rule and consequently to
delay the safety benefits from continued
compliance by employers with State
laws. For the same reasons, the
Department finds that there is good
cause to make the rule effective
immediately.
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory
Flexibility Act
The Department has determined that
this action is not considered a
significant regulatory action for
purposes of Executive Order 12866 or
the Department’s regulatory policies and
procedures. The interim final rule
makes minor modifications to our rules
to clarify that employers and TPAs for
owner-operators are authorized to
release employee-specific drug and
alcohol testing information where
required by State law.
This rule is being adopted solely to
clarify that DOT rules do not conflict
with State laws requiring employers to
submit drug and alcohol test results to
State safety agencies. As such, it
imposes no compliance costs on any
business or governmental entity. Any
costs resulting from compliance of
employers with State laws are
attributable to those State laws, not to
this rule. Given the absence of
compliance costs to anyone, I certify
that the interim final rule does not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The benefits of this rule, which are
not quantifiable, involve potential
improvements to safety as the result of
State procedures that could prevent
violators of DOT rules from driving
commercial vehicles for a time and in
helping to prevent ‘‘job hopping’’ by
drivers who test positive for one
company and then seek a job at another
company. It is important for the
Department and States to begin realizing
these benefits at this time.
Executive Order 13132
The Department has analyzed this
proposed action in accordance with the
principles and criteria contained in
Executive Order 13132, and has
determined that, by explicitly
facilitating the operation of State laws,
the amendments is consistent with the
Executive Order and that no
consultation is necessary. It avoids the
preemption of State laws with respect to
the reporting of testing information by
employers and third-party
administrators providing services to
owner-operators.
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 40
Administrative practice and
procedures, Alcohol abuse, Alcohol
testing, Drug abuse, Drug testing,
Laboratories, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Safety,
Transportation.
E:\FR\FM\13JNR1.SGM
13JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 115 / Friday, June 13, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Issued at Washington, DC, this 22nd day of
May, 2008.
Mary E. Peters,
Secretary of Transportation.
For reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Department of
Transportation amends Title 49 of the
Code of Federal Regulations, Part 40, as
follows:
I
PART 40—PROCEDURES FOR
TRANSPORTATION WORKPLACE
DRUG AND ALCOHOL TESTING
PROGRAMS
1. The authority citation for 49 CFR
part 40 continues to read as follows:
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
I
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:26 Jun 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 102, 301, 322, 5331,
20140, 31306, and 45101 et seq.; 49 U.S.C.
322.
2. Amend 40.331 by adding a new
paragraph (g) to read as follows:
I
§ 40.331 To what additional parties must
employers and service agents release
information?
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Notwithstanding any other
provision of this Part, as an employer of
Commercial Motor Vehicle (CMV)
drivers holding commercial driving
licenses (CDLs) or as a third party
administrator for owner-operator CMV
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
33737
drivers with CDLs, you are authorized to
comply with State laws requiring you to
provide to State CDL licensing
authorities information about all
violations of DOT drug and alcohol
testing rules (including positive tests
and refusals) by any CMV driver
holding a CDL.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E8–13377 Filed 6–12–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–62–P
E:\FR\FM\13JNR1.SGM
13JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 115 (Friday, June 13, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 33735-33737]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-13377]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
49 CFR Part 40
[Docket OST-2008-0184]
RIN OST 2105-AD67
Procedures for Transportation Workplace Drug and Alcohol Testing
Programs: State Laws Requiring Drug and Alcohol Rule Violation
Information
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, DOT.
ACTION: Interim final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of the Secretary (OST) is amending its drug and
alcohol testing procedures to authorize employers to disclose to State
commercial driver licensing (CDL) authorities the drug and alcohol
violations of employees who hold CDLs and operate commercial motor
vehicles (CMVs), when a State law requires such reporting. This rule
also permits third-party administrators (TPAs) to provide the same
information to State CDL licensing authorities where State law requires
the TPAs to do so for owner-operator CMV drivers with CDLs.
DATES: The rule is effective June 13, 2008. Comments to this interim
final rule should be submitted by August 12, 2008. Late-filed comments
will be considered to the extent practicable.
ADDRESSES: You may file comments identified by the docket number DOT-
OST-2008-0184 by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE., West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE., between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET,
Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Instructions: You must include the agency name and docket number
DOT-OST-2008-0184 or the Regulatory Identification Number (RIN) for the
rulemaking at the beginning of your comment. All comments received will
be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For program issues, Bohdan Baczara or
Patrice M. Kelly, Office of Drug and Alcohol Policy and Compliance,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590; (202) 366-3784
(voice), (202) 366-3897 (fax), bohdan.baczara@dot.gov or
patrice.kelly@dot.gov (e-mail). For legal issues, Robert C. Ashby,
Deputy Assistant General Counsel for Regulations and Enforcement, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590; (202) 366-9310 (voice),
(202) 366-9313 (fax) or bob.ashby@dot.gov (e-mail).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Confidentiality of an employee's test
results is a cornerstone of the balance between public safety and
employee privacy that is crucial to the Department of Transportation's
testing program. Early in the Department of Transportation's drug
testing program, we recognized the need for confidentiality of employee
testing information and reflected this in our December 1, 1989 Federal
Register notice (54 FR 49854). This rule required the Medical Review
Officer (MRO) to disclose positive drug test result information only to
employers. The rule also required laboratories to maintain employee
test records in confidence, but permitted laboratories to disclose a
positive drug test result to the employee, employer, or the decision
maker in a lawsuit, grievance or other proceeding initiated by or on
behalf of the employee as a result of the employee's positive drug
test.
Congress passed the Omnibus Transportation Employee Testing Act of
1991, which directed the Department to implement significant changes to
its substance abuse testing program, and specifically referenced
providing for the confidentiality of employee test results. The
Department amended its drug and alcohol testing regulations to
implement these statutory requirements. (59 FR 7340; February 15,
1994). As provided in the original 1989 DOT rules and the 1994
amendments, Part 40 includes strict and specific provisions for
maintaining the confidentiality of employee testing records.
Specifically, employers are permitted to release employee drug and
alcohol testing records to other employers only upon written consent
from the employee, and only when the consent authorized the release to
a specifically identified individual.
In 2000, the Department revised its drug and alcohol testing
regulations (65 FR 79462). In this revision, the Department prohibited
MROs from disclosing employee drug testing information to other
employers and prohibited service agents and employers from using
blanket releases. We intended in 2000 for State safety agencies with
regulatory authority over employers to be provided with certain testing
information about an individual employee with no signed releases
necessary. In recent years, several States have passed legislation
requiring the release of certain test result and refusal information
for all CDL holders without the employees' consent. Specifically, the
States have required employers and/or their service agents to report to
their respective State CDL issuing and licensing authorities the drug
and alcohol violations of employees who are CMV drivers with CDLs. We
do not want our regulations to have the effect of prohibiting employers
and TPAs of owner-operators from providing the drug and alcohol test
results of CMV drivers with CDLs. Consequently, the Department must
take rapid action to avoid any such conflict.
The Department believes that State action to suspend or revoke the
CDLs of CMV drivers who violate DOT rules until they demonstrate that
they have successfully completed the SAP process can have important
safety benefits. We support State legislation that can reliably provide
State CDL licensing authorities with the information they need to take
such action. In particular, the Department is concerned that, in the
absence of such action, CMV drivers with CDLs who do not seek required
Substance Abuse Professional (SAP) evaluations, yet continue to perform
safety-sensitive duties after they violate the Department's drug and
alcohol regulations (so-called ``job hoppers''), pose an unacceptable
safety risk to the public. We believe measures taken by States to
suspend or revoke the CDL licenses of CMV drivers who violate DOT drug
and alcohol rules will enhance the Department's efforts to ensure that
such drivers are evaluated by SAPs and receive treatment or education
before they resume safety-sensitive duties.
To be consistent with our policy in enforcing the existing
regulations and because we want to ensure that 49 CFR Part 40 is
supportive of such State
[[Page 33736]]
legislation, we are acting at this time to amend section 40.331. This
amendment specifies that employers are authorized to respond--without
conflict with Part 40 confidentiality requirements--to State law
requirements by providing drug and alcohol violation information to
State CDL licensing authorities on all CMV drivers with CDLs who are
covered by DOT testing rules. This same authorization applies to TPAs
for owner-operators, since they are the party in the best position to
provide this data if owner-operators choose not to report their own
violations. We note that this amendment does not authorize the release
of individually identifiable testing information outside the scope of
the State laws requiring its provision to a State agency for safety
purposes. For example, if a State statute requires employers to provide
information on positive tests and refusals to the DMV for purposes of
taking action against the driver's CDL, it would be improper for the
DMV to release the test information to other third parties without the
written consent of the driver.
An employer, or a TPA for an owner-operator, is in the best
position to provide this information reliably to State authorities
because it is the only entity with knowledge and information about all
drug and alcohol violations for an employee. For example, an MRO will
not necessarily know that an employee refused to go to the collection
site. Since MROs are not involved in the alcohol testing process, MROs
will not have any information concerning an alcohol test. Likewise, a
breath alcohol technician will not have any information about an
employee's drug test result. A SAP will have no records on an employee
who has not sought evaluation and treatment after a rule violation.
Many service agents are located out of State and may not know of a
State law requirement, and in any case they may not be readily subject
to State law jurisdiction. Most have no way of knowing whether the
employee is a CMV driver with a CDL or which DOT agency regulates the
employee. Employers, on the other hand, have all this information, and
are in-State employers subject to the State's jurisdiction.
This amendment is not a mandate to employers or TPAs for owner-
operators to send information to State authorities. It simply
authorizes them to comply with the specifics of State information
collection requirements. For example, if State A requires only positive
drug tests to be transmitted to its Department of Motor Vehicles, an
employer or TPA could provide only records of the employee's positive
drug test without written employee consent. The employer or TPA could
not provide ``blanket'' information about refusals or alcohol tests to
State A without written employee consent, since this was not required
by State law. We note that enforcement of State laws that apply to a
given employer or TPA would remain a State responsibility.
Regulatory Analyses and Notices
Authority
The statutory authority for this rule derives from the Omnibus
Transportation Employee Testing Act of 1991 (49 U.S.C. 102, 301, 322,
5331, 20140, 31306, and 45101 et seq.) and the Department of
Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 322).
Administrative Procedure Act
The Department has determined that this rule may be issued without
a prior opportunity for notice and comment because providing prior
notice and comment would be unnecessary, impracticable, or contrary to
the public interest. Because several States already have laws requiring
the reporting of test result information and other States may be
contemplating enacting such laws, it is important to clarify the status
of employers and TPAs for owner-operators seeking to comply with these
laws. As States work with drug testing program participants to
implement their laws, it is essential that the Department work, without
delay, to avoid any potential conflicts with Federal regulations that
could impede such employers and TPAs from providing needed information
to State agencies. It is important to resolve, as soon as possible,
questions that States and other participants have already raised about
the relationship of State law and DOT regulations in this area. Issuing
the interim final rule should help to avoid confusion that could, to
some extent, diminish the safety benefits that the combination of
Federal and State requirements concerning persons who violate drug
testing rules would otherwise have.
This rule clarifies that, in the interest of safety, employers and
TPAs for owner-operators may comply with State reporting requirements
to disclose to their State CDL authorities the DOT drug and alcohol
violations of CMV drivers with CDLs. It would be inadvisable for the
Department to delay issuing this rule and consequently to delay the
safety benefits from continued compliance by employers with State laws.
For the same reasons, the Department finds that there is good cause to
make the rule effective immediately.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department has determined that this action is not considered a
significant regulatory action for purposes of Executive Order 12866 or
the Department's regulatory policies and procedures. The interim final
rule makes minor modifications to our rules to clarify that employers
and TPAs for owner-operators are authorized to release employee-
specific drug and alcohol testing information where required by State
law.
This rule is being adopted solely to clarify that DOT rules do not
conflict with State laws requiring employers to submit drug and alcohol
test results to State safety agencies. As such, it imposes no
compliance costs on any business or governmental entity. Any costs
resulting from compliance of employers with State laws are attributable
to those State laws, not to this rule. Given the absence of compliance
costs to anyone, I certify that the interim final rule does not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
The benefits of this rule, which are not quantifiable, involve
potential improvements to safety as the result of State procedures that
could prevent violators of DOT rules from driving commercial vehicles
for a time and in helping to prevent ``job hopping'' by drivers who
test positive for one company and then seek a job at another company.
It is important for the Department and States to begin realizing these
benefits at this time.
Executive Order 13132
The Department has analyzed this proposed action in accordance with
the principles and criteria contained in Executive Order 13132, and has
determined that, by explicitly facilitating the operation of State
laws, the amendments is consistent with the Executive Order and that no
consultation is necessary. It avoids the preemption of State laws with
respect to the reporting of testing information by employers and third-
party administrators providing services to owner-operators.
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 40
Administrative practice and procedures, Alcohol abuse, Alcohol
testing, Drug abuse, Drug testing, Laboratories, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Safety, Transportation.
[[Page 33737]]
Issued at Washington, DC, this 22nd day of May, 2008.
Mary E. Peters,
Secretary of Transportation.
0
For reasons discussed in the preamble, the Department of Transportation
amends Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 40, as
follows:
PART 40--PROCEDURES FOR TRANSPORTATION WORKPLACE DRUG AND ALCOHOL
TESTING PROGRAMS
0
1. The authority citation for 49 CFR part 40 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 102, 301, 322, 5331, 20140, 31306, and
45101 et seq.; 49 U.S.C. 322.
0
2. Amend 40.331 by adding a new paragraph (g) to read as follows:
Sec. 40.331 To what additional parties must employers and service
agents release information?
* * * * *
(g) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Part, as an
employer of Commercial Motor Vehicle (CMV) drivers holding commercial
driving licenses (CDLs) or as a third party administrator for owner-
operator CMV drivers with CDLs, you are authorized to comply with State
laws requiring you to provide to State CDL licensing authorities
information about all violations of DOT drug and alcohol testing rules
(including positive tests and refusals) by any CMV driver holding a
CDL.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E8-13377 Filed 6-12-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P