Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Exemption, 33858-33859 [E8-13321]
Download as PDF
33858
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 115 / Friday, June 13, 2008 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
reading-rm/adams.html. From this site,
you can access the NRC’s Agencywide
Document Access and Management
System (ADAMS), which provides text
and image files of NRC’s public
documents. The documents related to
this action are listed below, along with
their ADAMS accession numbers:
1. Shannon L. Gleason, Ph.D., Bayer
HealthCare, letter to U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Region III,
dated October 23, 2006 (ML062970437);
2. Certificate of Disposition of
Materials, dated November 31, 2007,
signed by Shannon L. Gleason, Ph.D.
(ML073050274);
3. Bayer HealthCare, LLC, Report No.
2007006/G4349, ‘‘Final Status Report
for Selected Laboratories in Building
18’’ (ML081400331);
4. Bayer HealthCare, LLC, Report No.
2007006/G–4351, ‘‘Historical Site
Assessment for the Elkhart, Indiana
Facility’’ (ML081400331);
5. Title 10 Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 20, Subpart E,
‘‘Radiological Criteria for License
Termination’’;
6. Title 10 Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 51, ‘‘Environmental
Protection Regulations for Domestic
Licensing and Related Regulatory
Functions’’;
7. NUREG–1496, ‘‘Generic
Environmental Impact Statement in
Support of Rulemaking on Radiological
Criteria for License Termination of NRCLicensed Nuclear Facilities’’;
8. NUREG–1757 Consolidated NMSS
Decommissioning Guidance.
If you do not have access to ADAMS,
or if there are problems in accessing the
documents located in ADAMS, contact
the NRC Public Document Room (PDR)
Reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–
415–4737, or by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov.
These documents may also be viewed
electronically on the public computers
located at the NRC’s PDR, O 1 F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, MD 20852. The PDR
reproduction contractor will copy
documents for a fee.
Dated at Lisle, Illinois, this 5th day of June
2008.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Christine A. Lipa,
Chief, Decommissioning Branch, Division of
Nuclear Materials Safety, Region III.
[FR Doc. E8–13327 Filed 6–12–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:18 Jun 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–293]
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.;
Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station
Exemption
1.0
Background
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
(Entergy or the licensee) is the holder of
Facility Operating License No. DPR–35,
which authorizes operation of the
Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station (Pilgrim).
The license provides, among other
things, that the facility is subject to all
rules, regulations, and orders of the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC
or the Commission) now or hereafter in
effect.
The facility consists of a boiling-water
reactor located in Plymouth County,
Massachusetts.
2.0
Request/Action
Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR), Part 50,
§ 50.75(f)(3), requires that ‘‘Each power
reactor licensee shall at or about 5 years
prior to the projected end of operations
submit a preliminary decommissioning
cost estimate which includes an up-todate assessment of the major factors that
could affect the cost to decommission.’’
Section 50.75(f)(5) requires a licensee at
the same time to include, if necessary,
plans to adjust funding levels to
demonstrate a reasonable level of
financial assurance, that funds will be
available when needed for
decommissioning. The current operating
licensee expires on June 8, 2012.
In summary, by letter dated February
28, 2008, Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS) accession number
ML081000176, Entergy requested an
exemption to the schedule requirement
of 10 CFR 50.75(f)(3) to allow Entergy to
submit the Pilgrim site-specific
preliminary cost estimate by August 1,
2008, which is less than 4 years from
the date of the expiration of the
operating license. The exemption
request applies to the timing of the
submission of the preliminary cost
estimate and did not request an
exemption from any of the information
requirements of the regulation.
3.0
Discussion
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12, the
Commission may, upon application by
any interested person or upon its own
initiative, grant exemptions from the
requirements of 10 CFR Part 50 when (1)
the exemptions are authorized by law,
will not present an undue risk to public
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
health or safety, and are consistent with
the common defense and security; and
(2) when special circumstances are
present. One of these special
circumstances, described in 10 CFR
50.12(a)(2)(ii), is that the application of
the regulation is not necessary to
achieve the underlying purpose of the
rule.
As documented in the
Decommissioning Considerations for
1991 Rules and Regulations, the
underlying purpose of 10 CFR
50.75(f)(3) is to provide a preliminary
decommissioning plan, a cost estimate
for implementing the plan, and any
changes in funding necessary to ensure
that there will be sufficient funds for
decommissioning.
The NRC staff reviewed the licensee’s
evaluation in support of the subject
exemption request. Entergy submitted
the decommissioning funding status
report for Pilgrim on March 26, 2008.
The NRC staff calculated Pilgrim’s
required minimum funding assurance
based on the formula under 10 CFR
50.75. The trust fund balances to the
midpoint of decommissioning
(December 2015), as effectively allowed
under NRC regulations, was also
calculated by applying a 2 percent real
rate of return. Based on the formula
amount, the Pilgrim decommissioning
trust fund has an excess of $125 million
as of December 31, 2007, and will have
an excess of more than $200 million by
the time of expiration of the license.
Entergy submitted a license renewal
application (LRA) for Pilgrim on January
25, 2006, which was approximately 6.5
years prior to the expiration date of the
operating license for Pilgrim Station. In
connection with the LRA, the final
supplemental environmental impact
statement was issued on July 27, 2007,
and the safety evaluation report for the
LRA was issued on June 28, 2007.
Subsequently, the safety evaluation
report was issued as NUREG–1891 on
November 30, 2007. Although the
licensee stated that the review of the
LRA and milestones achieved constitute
‘‘a clear indication’’ that the LRA will be
granted, the NRC does not agree.
Entergy’s exemption request
essentially relies on the fact that its LRA
is pending before the NRC, certain
milestones have been met, and that
Entergy anticipates the NRC will render
a final decision on the LRA on or about
August 1, 2008. Entergy cites selected
language from the statement of
considerations for the proposed rule for
license renewal, as well as language
from the statement of considerations for
the final license renewal rule, to support
its exemption request. Entergy argues
that the level of review, thus far, on the
E:\FR\FM\13JNN1.SGM
13JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 115 / Friday, June 13, 2008 / Notices
LRA and the achievement of certain
milestones ‘‘represent a clear indication
that the Pilgrim LRA would be
ultimately approved.’’ Therefore, the
Commission should waive the
requirement for a preliminary cost
estimate, according to Entergy. Entergy
further argues that ‘‘approximately four
years prior to the expiration date of the
current operating license * * * is
within interpretation of the regulation’’
requiring a preliminary cost estimate at
or about 5 years prior to the projected
end of operations.
The NRC does not agree that the
review, thus far, of the LRA and
milestones achieved constitute ‘‘a clear
indication’’ that the LRA will be
granted. Moreover, the NRC does not
agree that submitting a preliminary cost
estimate less than 4 years prior to
license expiration is within
interpretation of the requirements of 10
CFR 50.75(f)(3).1 Therefore, based on
the arguments presented by Entergy, an
exemption is not warranted.
However, the NRC has considered the
current funding levels of Pilgrim’s
decommissioning trust and the
underlying purpose of 10 CFR
50.75(f)(3). Moreover, the NRC staff is
not aware of any information indicating
that the preliminary decommissioning
cost estimate for Pilgrim is likely to be
higher than the current minimum
formula amount to such a degree that a
problematic underfunding situation will
exist that would require a full 5-year
period to rectify.
Authorized by Law
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
This exemption would allow Entergy
to submit the Pilgrim site-specific
preliminary cost estimate by August 1,
2008, which is less than 4 years from
the date of the expiration of the
operating license. As stated in Section
3.0 above, 10 CFR 50.12 allows the NRC
to grant exemptions from the
requirements of 10 CFR Part 50. The
NRC staff has determined that granting
of the licensee’s proposed exemption
will not result in a violation of the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended,
or the Commission’s regulations.
Therefore, the exemption is authorized
by law.
1 If Entergy believes that submitting a preliminary
cost estimate less than 4 years prior to the date of
license expiration is ‘‘within interpretation of the
regulation,’’ then it is not clear why Entergy has
filed this exemption request. The NRC staff notes
that Entergy has not claimed that the ‘‘projected end
of operations’’ unexpectedly moved to an earlier
date as a result in change of circumstance (for
example, early permanent shutdown), thus
resulting in a period of time spent to submit a
preliminary cost estimate well short of the 5 years.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:18 Jun 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
No Undue Risk To Public Health And
Safety
The underlying purpose of 10 CFR
50.75(f)(3), is to ensure that all power
reactor licensees maintain minimum
decommissioning funding assurance
that a facility will be able to
decontaminate to NRC standards before
a license is terminated. The exemption
request applies to the timing of the
submission of the preliminary cost
estimate and did not request an
exemption from any of the information
requirements of the regulation.
Based on the above, no new accident
precursors are created by allowing
Entergy to submit the Pilgrim sitespecific preliminary cost estimate by
August 1, 2008, which is less than 4
years from the date of the expiration of
the operating license. Similarly, the
probability of postulated accidents is
not increased. Therefore, there is no
undue risk (since risk is probability
multiplied by consequences) to public
health and safety.
Consistent With Common Defense And
Security
The proposed exemption would allow
Entergy to submit the Pilgrim sitespecific preliminary cost estimate by
August 1, 2008, which is less than 4
years from the date of the expiration of
the operating license. This change to the
plant requirements for the preliminary
decommissioning cost estimate
submittal has no relation to security
issues. Therefore, the common defense
and security is not impacted by this
exemption.
Special Circumstances
One of the special circumstances,
described in 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii), is
that the application of the regulation is
not necessary to achieve the underlying
purpose of the rule. The underlying
purpose of 10 CFR 50.75(f)(3), is to
ensure that all power reactor licensees
maintain minimum decommissioning
funding assurance that a facility will be
able to decontaminate to NRC standards
before a license is terminated. The NRC
staff finds that the preliminary
decommissioning cost estimate for
Pilgrim is not likely to be higher than
the current minimum formula amount
to such a degree that a problematic
underfunding situation will exist that
would require a full 5-year period to
rectify.
Based upon consideration of the
information in the licensee’s submittal,
the NRC staff concludes that this
exemption meets the underlying
purpose of the rule.
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
33859
4.0 Conclusion
Accordingly, the Commission has
determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR
50.12(a), the exemption is authorized by
law, will not present an undue risk to
the public health and safety, and is
consistent with the common defense
and security. In addition, a special
circumstance is present such that the
application of the regulation in these
particular circumstances is not
necessary to achieve the underlying
purpose of the rule. Therefore, the
Commission hereby grants Entergy a
schedule exemption from the
requirement of 10 CFR 50.75(f)(3) to
submit the Pilgrim site-specific
preliminary cost estimate by August 1,
2008.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, the
Commission has determined that the
granting of this exemption will not have
a significant effect on the quality of the
human environment (73 FR32607).
This exemption is effective upon
issuance.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 9th day
of June 2008.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Timothy McGinty,
Acting Director, Division of Operating Reactor
Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. E8–13321 Filed 6–12–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[EA–08–033]
In the Matter of; Certain Panoramic and
Underwater Irradiators Authorized To
Possess Greater Than 370
Terabecquerels 10,000 Curies
Byproduct Material in the Form of
Sealed Sources
Order Imposing Compensatory
Measures (Effective Immediately)
I
The Licensees identified in
Attachment 1 to this Order hold licenses
issued in accordance with the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954 and 10 CFR Part 36
or comparable Agreement State
regulations by the U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC or
Commission) or an Agreement State
authorizing possession of greater than
370 terabecquerels (10,000 curies) of
byproduct material in the form of sealed
sources either in panoramic irradiators
that have dry or wet storage of the
sealed sources or in underwater
irradiators in which both the source and
the product being irradiated are under
E:\FR\FM\13JNN1.SGM
13JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 115 (Friday, June 13, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33858-33859]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-13321]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50-293]
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station
Exemption
1.0 Background
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy or the licensee) is the
holder of Facility Operating License No. DPR-35, which authorizes
operation of the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station (Pilgrim). The license
provides, among other things, that the facility is subject to all
rules, regulations, and orders of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(NRC or the Commission) now or hereafter in effect.
The facility consists of a boiling-water reactor located in
Plymouth County, Massachusetts.
2.0 Request/Action
Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Part 50,
Sec. 50.75(f)(3), requires that ``Each power reactor licensee shall at
or about 5 years prior to the projected end of operations submit a
preliminary decommissioning cost estimate which includes an up-to-date
assessment of the major factors that could affect the cost to
decommission.'' Section 50.75(f)(5) requires a licensee at the same
time to include, if necessary, plans to adjust funding levels to
demonstrate a reasonable level of financial assurance, that funds will
be available when needed for decommissioning. The current operating
licensee expires on June 8, 2012.
In summary, by letter dated February 28, 2008, Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System (ADAMS) accession number ML081000176,
Entergy requested an exemption to the schedule requirement of 10 CFR
50.75(f)(3) to allow Entergy to submit the Pilgrim site-specific
preliminary cost estimate by August 1, 2008, which is less than 4 years
from the date of the expiration of the operating license. The exemption
request applies to the timing of the submission of the preliminary cost
estimate and did not request an exemption from any of the information
requirements of the regulation.
3.0 Discussion
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12, the Commission may, upon application by
any interested person or upon its own initiative, grant exemptions from
the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50 when (1) the exemptions are
authorized by law, will not present an undue risk to public health or
safety, and are consistent with the common defense and security; and
(2) when special circumstances are present. One of these special
circumstances, described in 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii), is that the
application of the regulation is not necessary to achieve the
underlying purpose of the rule.
As documented in the Decommissioning Considerations for 1991 Rules
and Regulations, the underlying purpose of 10 CFR 50.75(f)(3) is to
provide a preliminary decommissioning plan, a cost estimate for
implementing the plan, and any changes in funding necessary to ensure
that there will be sufficient funds for decommissioning.
The NRC staff reviewed the licensee's evaluation in support of the
subject exemption request. Entergy submitted the decommissioning
funding status report for Pilgrim on March 26, 2008. The NRC staff
calculated Pilgrim's required minimum funding assurance based on the
formula under 10 CFR 50.75. The trust fund balances to the midpoint of
decommissioning (December 2015), as effectively allowed under NRC
regulations, was also calculated by applying a 2 percent real rate of
return. Based on the formula amount, the Pilgrim decommissioning trust
fund has an excess of $125 million as of December 31, 2007, and will
have an excess of more than $200 million by the time of expiration of
the license.
Entergy submitted a license renewal application (LRA) for Pilgrim
on January 25, 2006, which was approximately 6.5 years prior to the
expiration date of the operating license for Pilgrim Station. In
connection with the LRA, the final supplemental environmental impact
statement was issued on July 27, 2007, and the safety evaluation report
for the LRA was issued on June 28, 2007. Subsequently, the safety
evaluation report was issued as NUREG-1891 on November 30, 2007.
Although the licensee stated that the review of the LRA and milestones
achieved constitute ``a clear indication'' that the LRA will be
granted, the NRC does not agree.
Entergy's exemption request essentially relies on the fact that its
LRA is pending before the NRC, certain milestones have been met, and
that Entergy anticipates the NRC will render a final decision on the
LRA on or about August 1, 2008. Entergy cites selected language from
the statement of considerations for the proposed rule for license
renewal, as well as language from the statement of considerations for
the final license renewal rule, to support its exemption request.
Entergy argues that the level of review, thus far, on the
[[Page 33859]]
LRA and the achievement of certain milestones ``represent a clear
indication that the Pilgrim LRA would be ultimately approved.''
Therefore, the Commission should waive the requirement for a
preliminary cost estimate, according to Entergy. Entergy further argues
that ``approximately four years prior to the expiration date of the
current operating license * * * is within interpretation of the
regulation'' requiring a preliminary cost estimate at or about 5 years
prior to the projected end of operations.
The NRC does not agree that the review, thus far, of the LRA and
milestones achieved constitute ``a clear indication'' that the LRA will
be granted. Moreover, the NRC does not agree that submitting a
preliminary cost estimate less than 4 years prior to license expiration
is within interpretation of the requirements of 10 CFR 50.75(f)(3).\1\
Therefore, based on the arguments presented by Entergy, an exemption is
not warranted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ If Entergy believes that submitting a preliminary cost
estimate less than 4 years prior to the date of license expiration
is ``within interpretation of the regulation,'' then it is not clear
why Entergy has filed this exemption request. The NRC staff notes
that Entergy has not claimed that the ``projected end of
operations'' unexpectedly moved to an earlier date as a result in
change of circumstance (for example, early permanent shutdown), thus
resulting in a period of time spent to submit a preliminary cost
estimate well short of the 5 years.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
However, the NRC has considered the current funding levels of
Pilgrim's decommissioning trust and the underlying purpose of 10 CFR
50.75(f)(3). Moreover, the NRC staff is not aware of any information
indicating that the preliminary decommissioning cost estimate for
Pilgrim is likely to be higher than the current minimum formula amount
to such a degree that a problematic underfunding situation will exist
that would require a full 5-year period to rectify.
Authorized by Law
This exemption would allow Entergy to submit the Pilgrim site-
specific preliminary cost estimate by August 1, 2008, which is less
than 4 years from the date of the expiration of the operating license.
As stated in Section 3.0 above, 10 CFR 50.12 allows the NRC to grant
exemptions from the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50. The NRC staff has
determined that granting of the licensee's proposed exemption will not
result in a violation of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, or
the Commission's regulations. Therefore, the exemption is authorized by
law.
No Undue Risk To Public Health And Safety
The underlying purpose of 10 CFR 50.75(f)(3), is to ensure that all
power reactor licensees maintain minimum decommissioning funding
assurance that a facility will be able to decontaminate to NRC
standards before a license is terminated. The exemption request applies
to the timing of the submission of the preliminary cost estimate and
did not request an exemption from any of the information requirements
of the regulation.
Based on the above, no new accident precursors are created by
allowing Entergy to submit the Pilgrim site-specific preliminary cost
estimate by August 1, 2008, which is less than 4 years from the date of
the expiration of the operating license. Similarly, the probability of
postulated accidents is not increased. Therefore, there is no undue
risk (since risk is probability multiplied by consequences) to public
health and safety.
Consistent With Common Defense And Security
The proposed exemption would allow Entergy to submit the Pilgrim
site-specific preliminary cost estimate by August 1, 2008, which is
less than 4 years from the date of the expiration of the operating
license. This change to the plant requirements for the preliminary
decommissioning cost estimate submittal has no relation to security
issues. Therefore, the common defense and security is not impacted by
this exemption.
Special Circumstances
One of the special circumstances, described in 10 CFR
50.12(a)(2)(ii), is that the application of the regulation is not
necessary to achieve the underlying purpose of the rule. The underlying
purpose of 10 CFR 50.75(f)(3), is to ensure that all power reactor
licensees maintain minimum decommissioning funding assurance that a
facility will be able to decontaminate to NRC standards before a
license is terminated. The NRC staff finds that the preliminary
decommissioning cost estimate for Pilgrim is not likely to be higher
than the current minimum formula amount to such a degree that a
problematic underfunding situation will exist that would require a full
5-year period to rectify.
Based upon consideration of the information in the licensee's
submittal, the NRC staff concludes that this exemption meets the
underlying purpose of the rule.
4.0 Conclusion
Accordingly, the Commission has determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR
50.12(a), the exemption is authorized by law, will not present an undue
risk to the public health and safety, and is consistent with the common
defense and security. In addition, a special circumstance is present
such that the application of the regulation in these particular
circumstances is not necessary to achieve the underlying purpose of the
rule. Therefore, the Commission hereby grants Entergy a schedule
exemption from the requirement of 10 CFR 50.75(f)(3) to submit the
Pilgrim site-specific preliminary cost estimate by August 1, 2008.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, the Commission has determined that the
granting of this exemption will not have a significant effect on the
quality of the human environment (73 FR32607).
This exemption is effective upon issuance.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 9th day of June 2008.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Timothy McGinty,
Acting Director, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of
Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. E8-13321 Filed 6-12-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P