List of Fisheries for 2009, 33760-33800 [08-1352]
Download as PDF
33760
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 115 / Friday, June 13, 2008 / Proposed Rules
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 300
[EPA–HQ–SFUND–1986–0008, Notice 3;
FRL–8578–8]
National Oil and Hazardous
Substances Pollution Contingency
Plan; National Priorities List
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Notice of intent to delete the
Double Eagle Refinery Site from the
National Priorities List.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) Region 6 is issuing a
Notice of Intent to Delete the Double
Eagle Refinery Co. Superfund Site (Site)
located in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma,
from the National Priorities List (NPL)
and requests public comments on this
proposed action. The NPL, promulgated
pursuant to section 105 of the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, is
found at Appendix B of 40 CFR part 300
which is the National Oil and
Hazardous Substances Pollution
Contingency Plan (NCP). The EPA and
the State of Oklahoma, through the
Oklahoma Department of Environmental
Quality (ODEQ), have determined that
all appropriate response actions under
CERCLA, other than operation and
maintenance and five-year reviews,
have been completed. However, this
deletion does not preclude future
actions under Superfund.
DATES: Comments concerning the
proposed deletion of this Site from the
NPL must be received by July 14, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
SFUND–1989–0008, Notice 3, by one of
the following methods:
• https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
online instructions for submitting
comments.
• E-mail: walters.donn@epa.gov.
• Fax: 1–214–665–6660.
• Mail: Donn Walters, Community
Involvement, U.S. EPA, Region 6 (6SF–
TS), 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas
75202–2733, (214) 665–6483 or 1–800–
533–3508.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–SFUND–1989–
0008, Notice 3. EPA’s policy is that all
comments received will be included in
the public docket without change and
may be made available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes
information claimed to be Confidential
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:17 Jun 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the following information repositories:
U.S. EPA Online Library System at
https://www.epa.gov/natlibra/ols.htm;
U.S. EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733,
(214) 665–6617, by appointment only
Monday through Friday 9 a.m. to 12
p.m. and 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.;
Ralph Ellison Library, 2000 Northeast
23, Oklahoma City, OK 73111, (409)
643–5979, Monday through
Wednesday 9 a.m. to 9 p.m., Thursday
and Friday 9 a.m. to 6 p.m., Saturday
10 a.m. to 4 p.m.;
Oklahoma Department of Environmental
Quality (ODEQ), 707 North Robinson,
Oklahoma City, OK 73101, (512) 239–
2920, Monday through Friday 8 a.m.
to 5 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bartolome Canellas, Remedial Project
Manager, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 6, 6SF–RL, 1445 Ross
Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733,
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
canellas.bart@epa.gov or (214) 665–
6662 or 1–800–533–3508.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the
‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ section of
today’s Federal Register, we are
publishing a direct final Notice of
Deletion of the Double Eagle Refinery
Co. Superfund Site without prior Notice
of Intent to Delete because we view this
as a noncontroversial revision and
anticipate no adverse comment. We
have explained our reasons for this
deletion in the preamble to the direct
final deletion. If we receive no adverse
comment(s) on this Notice of Intent to
Delete or the direct final Notice of
Deletion, we will not take further action
on this Notice of Intent to Delete. If we
receive adverse comment(s), we will
withdraw the direct final Notice of
Deletion, and it will not take effect. We
will, as appropriate, address all public
comments in a subsequent final deletion
notice based on this Notice of Intent to
Delete. We will not institute a second
comment period on this Notice of Intent
to Delete. Any parties interested in
commenting must do so at this time.
For additional information see the
direct final Notice of Deletion located in
the Rules section of this Federal
Register.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Chemicals, Hazardous
waste, Hazardous substances,
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Superfund, Water
pollution control, Water supply.
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C.
9601–9657; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR,
1991 Comp., p. 351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR 2923;
3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 193.
Dated: May 23, 2008.
Richard E. Greene,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. E8–13366 Filed 6–12–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 229
[Docket No. 080204115–8135–01]
RIN 0648–AW48
List of Fisheries for 2009
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 115 / Friday, June 13, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Proposed rule; request for
comments.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS) publishes its
proposed List of Fisheries (LOF) for
2009, as required by the Marine
Mammal Protection Act (MMPA). The
proposed LOF for 2009 reflects new
information on interactions between
commercial fisheries and marine
mammals. NMFS must categorize each
commercial fishery on the LOF into one
of three categories under the MMPA
based upon the level of serious injury
and mortality of marine mammals that
occurs incidental to each fishery. The
categorization of a fishery in the LOF
determines whether participants in that
fishery are subject to certain provisions
of the MMPA, such as registration,
observer coverage, and take reduction
plan requirements.
DATES: Comments must be received by
August 12, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Send comments by anyone
of the following methods.
(1) Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic comments through the
Federal eRulemaking portal: https://
www.regulations.gov (follow
instructions for submitting comments).
(2) Mail: Chief, Marine Mammal and
Sea Turtle Conservation Division, Attn:
List of Fisheries, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-West
Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910.
Comments regarding the burden-hour
estimates, or any other aspect of the
collection of information requirements
contained in this proposed rule, should
be submitted in writing to Chief, Marine
Mammal and Sea Turtle Conservation
Division, Office of Protected Resources,
NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver
Spring, MD 20910, or to David Rostker,
OMB, by fax to 202–395–7285 or by
email to DavidlRostker@omb.eop.gov.
Instructions: All comments received
are a part of the public record and will
generally be posted to https://
www.regulations.gov without change.
All personal identifying information (for
example, name, address, etc.)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
may be publicly accessible. Do not
submit confidential business
information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments.
Attachments to electronic comments
will be accepted in Microsoft Word,
Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF file
formats only.
See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for a
listing of all Regional Offices.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Melissa Andersen, Office of Protected
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:17 Jun 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
Resources, 301–713–2322; David
Gouveia, Northeast Region, 978–281–
9328; Nancy Young, Southeast Region,
727–824–5312; Elizabeth Petras,
Southwest Region, 562–980–3238; Brent
Norberg, Northwest Region, 206–526–
6733; Bridget Mansfield, Alaska Region,
907–586–7642; Lisa Van Atta, Pacific
Islands Region, 808–944–2257.
Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the
hearing impaired may call the Federal
Information Relay Service at 1–800–
877–8339 between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.
Eastern time, Monday through Friday,
excluding Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Availability of Published Materials
Information regarding the LOF and
the Marine Mammal Authorization
Program, including registration
procedures and forms, current and past
LOFs, observer requirements, and
marine mammal injury/mortality
reporting forms and submittal
procedures, may be obtained at: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/interactions/lof/
, or from any NMFS Regional Office at
the addresses listed below.
Regional Offices
NMFS, Northeast Region, One
Blackburn Drive, Gloucester, MA
01930–2298, Attn: Marcia Hobbs;
NMFS, Southeast Region, 263 13th
Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701,
Attn: Teletha Mincey;
NMFS, Southwest Region, 501 W.
Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long Beach,
CA 90802–4213, Attn: Lyle Enriquez;
NMFS, Northwest Region, 7600 Sand
Point Way NE, Seattle, WA 98115, Attn:
Permits Office;
NMFS, Alaska Region, Protected
Resources, P.O. Box 22668, 709 West
9th Street, Juneau, AK 99802, Attn:
Bridget Mansfield; or
NMFS, Pacific Islands Region,
Protected Resources, 1601 Kapiolani
Boulevard, Suite 1100, Honolulu, HI
96814–4700, Attn: Lisa Van Atta.
What is the List of Fisheries?
Section 118 of the MMPA requires
NMFS to place all U.S. commercial
fisheries into one of three categories
based on the level of incidental serious
injury and mortality of marine mammals
occurring in each fishery (16 U.S.C.
1387(c)(1)). The categorization of a
fishery in the LOF determines whether
participants in that fishery may be
required to comply with certain
provisions of the MMPA, such as
registration, observer coverage, and take
reduction plan requirements. NMFS
must reexamine the LOF annually,
considering new information in the
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
33761
Marine Mammal Stock Assessment
Reports (SAR) and other relevant
sources, and publish in the Federal
Register any necessary changes to the
LOF after notice and opportunity for
public comment (16 U.S.C. 1387
(c)(1)(C)).
How Does NMFS Determine in which
Category a Fishery is Placed?
The definitions for the fishery
classification criteria can be found in
the implementing regulations for section
118 of the MMPA (50 CFR 229.2). The
criteria are also summarized here.
Fishery Classification Criteria
The fishery classification criteria
consist of a two-tiered, stock-specific
approach that first addresses the total
impact of all fisheries on each marine
mammal stock, and then addresses the
impact of individual fisheries on each
stock. This approach is based on
consideration of the rate, in numbers of
animals per year, of incidental
mortalities and serious injuries of
marine mammals due to commercial
fishing operations relative to the
potential biological removal (PBR) level
for each marine mammal stock. The
MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1362 (20)) defines the
PBR level as the maximum number of
animals, not including natural
mortalities, that may be removed from a
marine mammal stock while allowing
that stock to reach or maintain its
optimum sustainable population. This
definition can also be found in the
implementing regulations for section
118 of the MMPA (50 CFR 229.2).
Tier 1: If the total annual mortality
and serious injury of a marine mammal
stock, across all fisheries, is less than or
equal to 10 percent of the PBR level of
the stock, all fisheries interacting with
the stock would be placed in Category
III (unless those fisheries interact with
other stock(s) in which total annual
mortality and serious injury is greater
than 10 percent of PBR). Otherwise,
these fisheries are subject to the next
tier (Tier 2) of analysis to determine
their classification.
Tier 2, Category I: Annual mortality
and serious injury of a stock in a given
fishery is greater than or equal to 50
percent of the PBR level.
Tier 2, Category II: Annual mortality
and serious injury of a stock in a given
fishery is greater than 1 percent and less
than 50 percent of the PBR level.
Tier 2, Category III: Annual mortality
and serious injury of a stock in a given
fishery is less than or equal to 1 percent
of the PBR level.
While Tier 1 considers the cumulative
fishery mortality and serious injury for
a particular stock, Tier 2 considers
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
33762
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 115 / Friday, June 13, 2008 / Proposed Rules
fishery-specific mortality and serious
injury for a particular stock. Additional
details regarding how the categories
were determined are provided in the
preamble to the proposed rule
implementing section 118 of the MMPA
(60 FR 45086, August 30, 1995).
Because fisheries are categorized on a
per-stock basis, a fishery may qualify as
one Category for one marine mammal
stock and another Category for a
different marine mammal stock. A
fishery is typically categorized on the
LOF at its highest level of classification
(e.g., a fishery qualifying for Category III
for one marine mammal stock and for
Category II for another marine mammal
stock will be listed under Category II).
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Other Criteria That May Be Considered
In the absence of reliable information
indicating the frequency of incidental
mortality and serious injury of marine
mammals by a commercial fishery,
NMFS will determine whether the
fishery qualifies for Category II by
evaluating other factors such as fishing
techniques, gear used, methods used to
deter marine mammals, target species,
seasons and areas fished, qualitative
data from logbooks or fisher reports,
stranding data, and the species and
distribution of marine mammals in the
area, or at the discretion of the Assistant
Administrator for Fisheries (50 CFR
229.2).
How Does NMFS Determine which
Species or Stocks are Included as
Incidentally Killed or Seriously Injured
in a Fishery?
The LOF includes a list of marine
mammal species or stocks incidentally
killed or seriously injured in each
commercial fishery, based on the level
of mortality or serious injury in each
fishery relative to the PBR level for each
stock. To determine which species or
stocks are included as incidentally
killed or seriously injured in a fishery,
NMFS annually reviews the information
presented in the current SARs. The
SARs are based upon the best available
scientific information and provide the
most current and inclusive information
on each stock’s PBR level and level of
mortality or serious injury incidental to
commercial fishing operations. NMFS
also reviews other sources of new
information, including observer data,
stranding data, and fisher self-reports.
In the absence of reliable information
on the level of mortality or serious
injury of a marine mammal stock, or
insufficient observer data, NMFS will
determine whether a species or stock
should be added to, or deleted from, the
list by considering other factors such as:
Changes in gear used, increases or
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:17 Jun 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
decreases in fishing effort, increases or
decreases in the level of observer
coverage, and/or changes in fishery
management that are expected to lead to
decreases in interactions with a given
marine mammal stock (such as a fishery
management plan or a take reduction
plan). NMFS will provide case-specific
justification in the LOF for changes to
the list of species or stocks incidentally
killed or seriously injured.
How Does NMFS Determine the Level of
Observer Coverage in a Fishery?
Data obtained from observers and the
level of observer coverage are important
tools in estimating the level of marine
mammal mortality and serious injury in
commercial fishing operations. The best
available information on the level of
observer coverage, and the spatial and
temporal distribution of observed
marine mammal interactions, is
presented in the SARs. Starting with the
2005 SARs, each SAR includes an
appendix with detailed descriptions of
each Category I and II fishery in the
LOF, including observer coverage. The
SARs generally do not provide detailed
information on observer coverage in
Category III fisheries because, under the
MMPA, Category III fisheries are not
required to accommodate observers
aboard vessels due to the remote
likelihood of mortality and serious
injury of marine mammals. Information
presented in the SARs’ appendices
includes: level of observer coverage,
target species, levels of fishing effort,
spatial and temporal distribution of
fishing effort, characteristics of fishing
gear and operations, management and
regulations, and interactions with
marine mammals. Copies of the SARs
are available on the NMFS Office of
Protected Resource’s website at: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/sars/.
Additional information on observer
programs in commercial fisheries can be
found on the NMFS National Observer
Program’s website: https://
www.st.nmfs.gov/st4/nop/.
How Do I Find Out if a Specific Fishery
is in Category I, II, or III?
This proposed rule includes three
tables that list all U.S. commercial
fisheries by LOF Category. Table 1 lists
all of the fisheries in the Pacific Ocean
(including Alaska); Table 2 lists all of
the fisheries in the Atlantic Ocean, Gulf
of Mexico, and Caribbean; Table 3 lists
all U.S.-authorized fisheries on the high
seas. A fourth table, Table 4, lists all
fisheries managed under applicable take
reduction plans or teams.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Are High Seas Fisheries Included on
the LOF?
NMFS received public comments for
the 2007 LOF (72 FR 14466, March 28,
2007, comment/response 9) and the
2008 LOF (72 FR 66048, November 27,
2007, comment/response 5) requesting
NMFS include high seas fisheries on the
LOF. In response to these comments,
NMFS analyzed the relationship
between MMPA sections 117 and 118
and the High Seas Fishing Compliance
Act (HSFCA) and determined that it is
appropriate to include U.S. fishers
fishing on the high seas on the LOF.
Beginning with the 2009 LOF, NMFS
proposes to include high seas fisheries
in Table 3 of the LOF. NMFS compiled
information on vessels issued a HSFCA
permit to identify fisheries operating on
the high seas and to ensure that all high
seas fisheries are included in the LOF,
particularly those that do not have a
component within waters under the
jurisdiction of the United States (e.g.,
State waters, the U.S. territorial sea, and
the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone
(EEZ); hereafter referred to as ‘‘U.S.
waters’’).
NMFS acknowledges that many
fisheries currently operate in both U.S.
waters and on the high seas, creating
some overlap between the fisheries
listed in Tables 1 and 2 and those in
Table 3. NMFS has designated those
fisheries in Tables 1, 2, and 3 by a ‘‘*’’
after the fishery’s name. The number of
HSFCA permits listed in Table 3 for the
high seas components of these U.S.
waters fisheries do not necessarily
represent additional fishers that are not
accounted for in Tables 1 and 2. Many
fishers holding these permits also fish
within U.S. waters and are included in
the number of vessels and participants
operating within those fisheries in Table
1 and 2. For example, the fishers
participating in the Category I ‘‘CA/OR
thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet
fishery’’ may operate in both U.S. waters
and the adjacent high seas, thus the high
seas component of this fishery (listed in
Table 3 as the ‘‘Pacific Highly Migratory
Species’’ drift gillnet) is not a separate
fishery, but an extension of the fishery
operating within U.S. waters (listed in
Table 1).
How Does NMFS Authorize U.S. Vessels
to Participate in High Seas Fisheries?
NMFS issues high seas fishing
permits, valid for five years, under the
HSFCA. To fish under a high seas
permit, a fisherman must also possess
any required permits issued under the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(MSA) (with the exception of the South
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 115 / Friday, June 13, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Pacific Tuna Treaty fisheries, the Pacific
Tuna Fisheries (Eastern Tropical Pacific
purse seine vessels) and the South
Pacific Albacore Troll fishery), and any
permits issued by NMFS to fish within
the convention area of a Regional
Fishery Management Organization.
Under the current permitting system,
however, a fisherman can obtain a high
seas permit prior to obtaining any
necessary MSA permits. Similarly, a
fisherman may have a HSFCA permit
that was issued prior to changes in
permits issued under the MSA.
Therefore, some fishers possess valid
HSFCA permits without the ability to
fish under the permit. For this reason,
the number of HSFCA permits
displayed in Table 3 of this proposed
rule is likely higher than the actual
fishing effort by U.S. vessels on the high
seas.
As of 2004, NMFS issues HSFCA
permits only for high seas fisheries
analyzed in accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) and the Endangered Species Act
(ESA). There are currently seven U.S.authorized high seas fisheries: Atlantic
Highly Migratory Species Fisheries,
Pacific Highly Migratory Species
Fisheries, Western Pacific Pelagic
Fisheries, South Pacific Albacore Troll
Fishing, Pacific Tuna Fisheries, South
Pacific Tuna Fisheries, and Antarctic
Marine Living Resources. The LOF will
not include the ‘‘Pacific (Eastern
Tropical) Tuna Fisheries’’ because these
fisheries are managed under Title III of
the MMPA, separate from those fisheries
subject to the LOF under section 118.
Permits obtained prior to 2004 for
fisheries that are no longer authorized
by the HSFCA, but for which the 5–year
permit is still valid, are included on the
LOF as ‘‘unspecified.’’ The
‘‘unspecified’’ fisheries will be removed
from the LOF once those permits have
expired, and the permit holder is
required to renew the permit under one
of the seven authorized fisheries.
The authorized high seas fisheries are
broad in scope and encompass multiple
specific fisheries identified by gear type.
Therefore, the seven U.S.-authorized
high seas fisheries, exclusive of the
‘‘Pacific (Eastern Tropical) Tuna
Fisheries’’, are subdivided on the LOF
based on gear types (e.g., trawls,
longlines, purse seines, gillnets, etc.), as
listed on each individual’s permit
application, to provide more detail on
composition of effort within these
fisheries.
How Will NMFS Categorize High Seas
Fisheries on the LOF?
As discussed in the previous sections
of this preamble, commercial fisheries
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:17 Jun 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
operating within U.S. waters are
categorized on the LOF based on the
level of mortality and serious injury of
marine mammal stocks incidental to
commercial fishing as related to the
stock’s PBR level. PBR levels are
calculated based on the stock’s
abundance using data presented in the
SARs. Section 117 of the MMPA (16
U.S.C. 1386) requires NMFS to prepare
SARs for marine mammal stocks
occurring ‘‘in waters under the
jurisdiction of the United States.’’
NMFS does not develop SARs or
calculate PBR levels for marine mammal
stocks on the high seas; therefore, NMFS
does not possess the same information
to categorize high seas fisheries as is
used to categorize fisheries operating
within U.S. waters.
NMFS proposes to categorize the
majority of high seas fisheries on the
LOF as Category II. Category II is the
appropriate category for new fisheries
for which NMFS does not have adequate
information to accurately categorize,
unless there is reliable information to
categorize it otherwise, or until further
information becomes available.
Categorizing a fishery as a Category II
allows NMFS to place observers on
vessels in that fishery, providing NMFS
the opportunity to obtain information
needed to most accurately catagorize a
commercial fishery. For fisheries that
operate both within U.S. waters and on
the high seas, the fishery will be
classified according to its status in U.S.
waters. Therefore, for a Category I or
Category III fishery within U.S. waters,
the high seas component would also be
classified as Category I or Category III,
accordingly. For example, the ‘‘Atlantic
Ocean, Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico large
pelagics longline fishery’’ is a Category
I fishery targeting highly migratory
species within U.S. waters. Vessels in
this fishery regularly cross into the high
seas while fishing. Therefore, the high
seas ‘‘Atlantic Highly Migratory
Species’’ longline fishery would also be
classified as Category I because it is the
same fishery regardless of whether a
vessel is fishing within U.S. waters or
crosses the boundary into the high seas.
Please see below under ‘‘Summary of
changes to the LOF for 2009’’ for more
details. NMFS will continue to gather
available information on the authorized
high seas fisheries and recategorize
fisheries in Table 3, if necessary, as
more information becomes available.
How Will NMFS Determine which
Species or Stocks to Include as
Incidentally Killed or Seriously Injured
in a High Seas Fishery?
All serious injury and mortality of
marine mammals incidental to
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
33763
commercial fishing operations, both in
U.S. waters and on the high seas, must
be reported to NMFS. High seas fishers
are provided with Marine Mammal Take
Reporting Forms to record such
incidents. (Very few marine mammal
takes by U.S. vessels participating in
high seas fisheries, however, have been
reported on these forms to date.)
Observer programs for fisheries
operating within U.S. waters also collect
data on the high seas if the vessel
should cross into high seas waters.
Additionally, some fisheries that
operate exclusively on the high seas
have formal observer programs that
provide data on interactions. In these
cases, the MSA, NEPA, or ESA
documents supporting the authorization
of the seven U.S.-authorized high seas
fisheries review observer documented
interactions and list the marine mammal
species taken in those fisheries. This
information is used to identify marine
mammals killed/injured in these
fisheries in Table 3 on the LOF. For
other fisheries without observer data,
the MSA, NEPA, and ESA documents
supporting the authorization of the
seven U.S.-authorized high seas
fisheries present information on marine
mammal interactions from anecdotal
and other reports, which do not always
specify the marine mammal species
involved in the interactions. Therefore,
marine mammal species killed or
injured in the high seas fisheries
without observer data that are listed in
Table 3 would be designated as
‘‘undetermined’’ until additional
information on marine mammal
populations and fishery interactions on
the high seas become available.
For high seas fisheries with an
associated fishery operating within U.S.
waters, as discussed above, Table 3
would list the same marine mammal
species killed or injured (excluding
coastal species that would not be found
on the high seas) as those killed or
injured by that fishery operating within
U.S. waters. For example, the ‘‘CA/OR
thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet
(≥14 in, mesh)’’ lists Risso’s dolphins as
killed or injured in the fishery operating
within U.S. waters. This species occurs
both within U.S. waters and the
adjacent high seas and vessels in this
fishery often cross into the high seas to
fish. NMFS assumes that these vessels
pose the same risk to the species on
both sides of the EEZ boundary.
Therefore, NMFS will also list Risso’s
dolphins under the high seas
component of this fishery, the ‘‘Pacific
Highly Migratory Species’’ drift gillnet
fishery. NMFS will add and delete
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
33764
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 115 / Friday, June 13, 2008 / Proposed Rules
species from the LOF as additional
information becomes available.
Am I Required to Register Under the
MMPA?
Owners of vessels or gear engaging in
a Category I or II fishery are required
under the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1387(c)(2)),
as described in 50 CFR 229.4, to register
with NMFS and obtain a marine
mammal authorization to lawfully take
a marine mammal incidental to
commercial fishing. Owners of vessels
or gear engaged in a Category III fishery
are not required to register with NMFS
or obtain a marine mammal
authorization.
How Do I Register?
NMFS has integrated the MMPA
registration process, the Marine
Mammal Authorization Program
(MMAP), with existing state and Federal
fishery license, registration, or permit
systems for all Category I and II fisheries
on the LOF. Participants in these
fisheries are automatically registered
under the MMAP and NMFS will issue
vessel or gear owners an authorization
certificate. Participants in these fisheries
are not required to submit registration or
renewal materials directly under the
MMAP. The authorization certificate, or
a copy, must be on board the vessel
while it is operating in a Category I or
II fishery, or for non-vessel fisheries, in
the possession of the person in charge
of the fishing operation (50 CFR
229.4(e)). Although efforts are made to
limit the issuance of authorization
certificates to only those vessel or gear
owners that participate in Category I or
II fisheries, not all state and Federal
permit systems distinguish between
fisheries as classified by the LOF.
Therefore, some vessel or gear owners in
Category III fisheries may receive
authorization certificates even though
they are not required for Category III
fisheries. Individuals fishing in Category
I and II fisheries for which no state or
Federal permit is required must register
with NMFS by contacting their
appropriate Regional Office (see
ADDRESSES).
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
How Do I Receive My Authorization
Certificate and Injury/Mortality
Reporting Forms?
All vessel or gear owners will receive
their authorization certificates and/or
injury/mortality reporting forms via U.S.
mail, except those vessel owners
participating in the Northeast and
Southeast Regional Integrated
Registration Program. Vessel or gear
owners participating in the Northeast
and Southeast Regional Integrated
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:17 Jun 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
Registration Program will receive their
authorization certificates as follows:
1. Northeast Region vessel or gear
owners participating in Category I or II
fisheries for which a state or Federal
permit is required may receive their
authorization certificate and/or injury/
mortality reporting form by contacting
the Northeast Regional Office at 978–
281–9300 x6505 or by visiting the
Northeast Regional Office Web site
(https://www.nero.noaa.gov/protlres/)
and following instructions for printing
the necessary documents.
2. Southeast Region vessel or gear
owners participating in Category I or II
fisheries for which a Federal permit is
required, as well as fisheries permitted
by the states of North Carolina, South
Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama,
Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas may
receive their authorization certificate
and/or injury/mortality reporting form
by contacting the Southeast Regional
Office at 727–824–5312 or by visiting
the Southeast Regional Office Web site
(https://sero.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/pr.htm)
and following instructions for printing
the necessary documents.
How Do I Renew My Registration
Under the MMPA?
Vessel or gear owners that participate
in Pacific Islands, Southwest, or Alaska
regional fisheries are automatically
renewed and should receive an
authorization certificate by January 1 of
each new year. Vessel or gear owners in
Washington and Oregon fisheries
receive authorization with each
renewed state fishing license, the timing
of which varies based on target species.
Vessel or gear owners who participate in
these regions and have not received
authorization certificates by January 1 or
with renewed fishing licenses must
contact the appropriate NMFS Regional
Office (see ADDRESSES).
Vessel or gear owners participating in
Southeast or Northeast regional fisheries
may receive their authorization
certificates by calling the relevant
NMFS Regional Office or visiting the
relevant NMFS Regional Office Web site
(see How Do I Receive My
Authorization Certificate and Injury/
Mortality Reporting Forms).
Am I Required to Submit Reports When
I Injure or Kill a Marine Mammal
During the Course of Commercial
Fishing Operations?
In accordance with the MMPA (16
U.S.C. 1387(e)) and 50 CFR 229.6, any
vessel owner or operator, or gear owner
or operator (in the case of non-vessel
fisheries), participating in a Category I,
II, or III fishery must report to NMFS all
incidental injuries and mortalities of
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
marine mammals that occur during
commercial fishing operations. ‘‘Injury’’
is defined in 50 CFR 229.2 as a wound
or other physical harm. In addition, any
animal that ingests fishing gear or any
animal that is released with fishing gear
entangling, trailing, or perforating any
part of the body is considered injured,
regardless of the presence of any wound
or other evidence of injury, and must be
reported. Injury/mortality reporting
forms and instructions for submitting
forms to NMFS can be downloaded
from: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/
pdfs/interactions/
mmaplreportinglform.pdf. Reporting
requirements and procedures can be
found in 50 CFR 229.6.
Am I Required to Take an Observer
Aboard My Vessel?
Fishers participating in a Category I or
II fishery are required to accommodate
an observer aboard vessel(s) upon
request. Observer requirements can be
found in 50 CFR 229.7.
Am I Required to Comply With Any
Take Reduction Plan Regulations?
Fishers participating in a Category I or
II fishery are required to comply with
any applicable take reduction plans.
Refer to Table 4 in this document for a
list of fisheries affected by take
reduction teams and plans. Take
reduction plan regulations can be found
at 50 CFR 229.30–35.
Sources of Information Reviewed for
the Proposed 2009 LOF
NMFS reviewed the marine mammal
incidental serious injury and mortality
information presented in the SARs for
all observed fisheries to determine
whether changes in fishery
classification were warranted. NMFS’
SARs are based on the best scientific
information available at the time of
preparation, including the level of
serious injury and mortality of marine
mammals that occurs incidental to
commercial fisheries and the PBR levels
of marine mammal stocks. The
information contained in the SARs is
reviewed by regional Scientific Review
Groups (SRGs) representing Alaska, the
Pacific (including Hawaii), and the U.S.
Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean.
The SRGs were created by the MMPA to
review the science that informs the
SARs, and to advise NMFS on
population status and trends, stock
structure, uncertainties in the science,
research needs, and other issues.
NMFS also reviewed other sources of
new information, including marine
mammal stranding data, observer
program data, fisher self-reports, fishery
management plans, ESA documents,
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 115 / Friday, June 13, 2008 / Proposed Rules
and other information that may not be
included in the SARs.
The proposed LOF for 2009 was
based, among other things, on
information provided in the NEPA and
ESA documents analyzing authorized
high seas fisheries, and the final SARs
for 1996 (63 FR 60, January 2, 1998), the
final SARs for 2001 (67 FR 10671,
March 8, 2002), the final SARs for 2002
(68 FR 17920, April 14, 2003), the final
SARs for 2003 (69 FR 54262, September
8, 2004), the final SARs for 2004 (70 FR
35397, June 20, 2005), the final SARs for
2005 (71 FR 26340, May 4, 2006), the
final SARs for 2006 (72 FR 12774,
March 19, 2007), the final SARs for 2007
(73 FR 21111, April 18, 2008), and the
draft SARs for 2008. All the SARs are
available at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
pr/sars/.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Fishery Descriptions
NMFS described each Category I and
II fishery on the LOF for 2008 in the
final 2008 LOF (72 FR 66048, November
27, 2007). Below, NMFS briefly
describes each fishery listed as a
Category I or II fishery appearing on the
LOF for the first time. Additional details
for Category I and II fisheries operating
in U.S. waters are included in the SARs,
Fishery Management Plans (FMPs), and
Take Reduction Plans (TRPs), or
through state agencies. Additional
details for Category I and II fisheries
operating on the high seas are included
in various FMPs, NEPA, or ESA
documents.
High Seas Atlantic Highly Migratory
Species Fisheries
The Atlantic Highly Migratory
Species (HMS) high seas fisheries are
similar to fisheries targeting Atlantic
HMS within U.S. waters, but primarily
use pelagic longline gear. Atlantic
swordfish and bigeye tuna are the
primary target species on the high seas,
with Atlantic yellowfin, albacore and
skipjack tunas, and pelagic and some
deepwater sharks also caught and
retained for sale. Bluefin tuna are caught
incidental to pelagic longline
operations, both on the high seas and
within U.S. waters, and may be retained
subject to specific target catch
requirements.
Within U.S. waters, HMS commercial
fishers use several gear types.
Authorized gear for tuna include
speargun (except when targeting
bluefin), rod and reel, handlines, bandit
gear, harpoon, pelagic longline, trap
(pound net and fish weir), and purse
seine. Purse seines used to target bluefin
tuna must have a mesh size of less than
or equal to 4.5 in (11.4 cm) and at least
24–count thread throughout the net.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:17 Jun 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
Only rod and reel gear may be used to
target billfish and commercial
possession of Atlantic billfish is
prohibited. Authorized gear for sharks
includes rod and reel, handline, bandit
gear, longline, and gillnet. Gillnets must
be less than or equal to 2.5 km (1.6 mi)
in length. Authorized gear for swordfish
includes handline, handgear (including
buoy gear), and longline for north
Atlantic swordfish, and longline for
south Atlantic swordfish. North Atlantic
swordfish incidentally taken in squid
trawls may be retained. The fishery
management area for Atlantic HMS
includes U.S. waters and the adjacent
high seas.
Atlantic HMS are managed under
regulations implementing the
Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP (2006),
under the authority of the MSA and the
Atlantic Tunas Convention Act (ATCA).
Regulations issued under the MSA
address the target fish species, as well
as bycatch of species protected by the
ESA, MMPA, and Migratory Bird Treaty
Act. The MSA regulations (50 CFR part
635) require vessel owners and
operators targeting Atlantic HMS with
longline or gillnet gear to complete
protected species (sea turtles and
marine mammals) safe handling,
release, and identification workshops.
The regulations also require shark
dealers to complete an Atlantic shark
identification workshop.
The high seas components of Atlantic
HMS fisheries are extensions of various
Category I II, and III fisheries operating
in U.S. waters (Tables 1 and 2). The
longline fishery targeting Atlantic HMS
in U.S. waters is the Category I,
‘‘Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico large pelagics longline fishery.’’
NMFS is currently developing
regulations to implement the Pelagic
Longline Take Reduction Plan (PLTRP)
for this fishery. The gillnet fishery
targeting Atlantic HMS in U.S. waters is
the Category II, ‘‘Southeastern U.S.
Atlantic shark gillnet’’ fishery. This
fishery is subject to the Bottlenose
Dolphin TRP (BDTRP) (50 CFR 229.35),
for coastal gillnetting only, and the
Atlantic Large Whale TRP (ALWTRP)
(50 CFR 229.32). The purse seine fishery
targeting Atlantic HMS in U.S. waters is
the Category III, ‘‘Atlantic tuna purse
seine fishery.’’
For more information on the Atlantic
HMS fisheries and details on the
management and regulations of these
fisheries, please see the Consolidated
Atlantic HMS FMP (https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/sfa/hms/
hmsdocumentlfiles/FMPs.htm) and the
regulations for Atlantic HMS fisheries in
50 CFR part 635.
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
33765
High Seas Pacific Highly Migratory
Species Fisheries
The Pacific HMS high seas fisheries
are virtually the same as fisheries
targeting Pacific HMS within U.S.
waters. Pacific HMS fisheries target
tunas (North Pacific albacore, yellowfin,
bigeye, skipjack, and bluefin), billfish
(striped marlin), sharks (common
thresher, pelagic thresher, bigeye
thresher, shortfin mako, and blue),
swordfish, and dorado (i.e., dolphinfish)
using several gear types. Authorized
gear include surface hook-and-line
(including troll, rod and reel, handline,
albacore jig, and live bait), harpoon
(non-mechanical), drift gillnet (14 in
(35.5 cm) stretch mesh or greater),
pelagic longline, and purse seine
(including ring, drum, and lampara
nets). Pacific HMS incidentally caught
by unauthorized gear may be landed
under certain circumstances. Species
prohibited in Pacific HMS fisheries
include any salmon species, great white
shark, basking shark, megamouth shark,
and Pacific halibut. The fishery
management area for Pacific HMS
covers U.S. waters from the U.S.-Mexico
border to the U.S.- Canada border, and
the adjacent high seas.
Pacific HMS are managed under
regulations implementing the FMP for
U.S. West Coast Fisheries for HMS,
adopted in April 2004. The MSA
regulations (50 CFR part 660, subpart K)
address the target fish species as well as
species protected by the ESA and
MMPA. The MSA regulations lay out
multiple restrictions for fishing for
Pacific HMS with longline gear. Vessels
fishing longline gear may not target
HMS within U.S. waters. Targeting
swordfish with shallow set longline gear
or possessing a light stick on board the
vessel west of 150° W. long. and north
of the equator is prohibited. From April
1–May 31, longline gear is prohibited in
the area bounded on the south by the
equator, north by 15° N. lat., east by
145° W. long., and west by 180° long.
Longline vessels must have a valid
protected species workshop certificate
onboard, along with safe handling and
release tools for sea turtles and seabirds.
Along with the MSA requirements,
including area closures for marine
mammal and sea turtle protection, drift
gillnet fishing for Pacific HMS is
managed under the MMPA through the
Pacific Offshore Cetacean Take
Reduction Plan (POCTRP) (50 CFR
229.31). The POCTRP regulations
require multiple gear modifications
during the May 1–January 31 fishing
season, including a requirement that all
extenders (buoy lines) be at least 6
fathoms (36 ft; 10.9 m) in length, all
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
33766
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 115 / Friday, June 13, 2008 / Proposed Rules
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
floatlines be fished at a minimum of 36
ft (10.9 m) below the surface, all nets
have operational pingers to a water
depth of a least 100 fathoms (600 ft;
182.9 m). Also, all drift gillnet vessel
operators must attend skipper education
workshops before each fishing season.
The high seas components of Pacific
HMS fisheries are extensions of various
Category I, II, and III fisheries operating
within U.S. waters (Tables 1 and 2). The
drift gillnet fishery targeting Pacific
HMS, the Category I ‘‘CA/OR thresher
shark/swordfish drift gillnet (≥14in.
mesh) fishery,’’ is managed under the
POCTRP. The purse seine fishery
targeting Pacific HMS within U.S.
waters is the Category II ‘‘CA tuna purse
seine fishery.’’ While longline fishing
for Pacific HMS is prohibited within
U.S. waters, the LOF includes the
Category II ‘‘CA pelagic longline
fishery’’ to account for swordfish caught
outside U.S. waters, but landed into the
U.S. West coast. The troll fishery
targeting Pacific HMS is an extension of
U.S. waters Category III ‘‘AK North
Pacific halibut, AK bottom fish, WA/
OR/CA albacore, groundfish, bottom
fish, CA halibut non-salmonid troll
fisheries.’’
For more information on the Pacific
HMS fisheries and details on the
management and regulations of these
fisheries, please see the Pacific HMS
FMP (https://www.pcouncil.org/hms/
hmsfmp.html#final), the Pacific HMS
FMP Biological Opinion (BiOp) (https://
swr.nmfs.noaa.gov/
HMSlFMPlOpinionlFinal.pdf), and
the regulations for Pacific HMS in 50
CFR part 660, subpart K.
High Seas Western Pacific Pelagic
Fisheries
The Western Pacific pelagic high seas
fisheries are virtually the same as
fisheries targeting Wester Pacific pelagic
species in U.S. waters. Western Pacific
pelagic fisheries target tunas (albacore,
bigeye, yellowfin, bluefin, and skipjack),
billfish (Indo-Pacific blue marlin, black
marlin, striped marlin, shortbill
spearfish), sharks (pelagic thresher,
bigeye thresher, common thresher, silky,
oceanic whitetip, blue, shortfin mako,
longfin mako, and salmon), swordfish,
sailfish, wahoo, kawakawa, moonfish,
pomfret, oilfish, and other tuna
relatives. The main gears used to fish in
the Western Pacific Pelagic fisheries are
pelagic longline, troll, and handline.
The Western Pacific Pelagic fisheries
take place in the Western Pacific
Fishery Management Area (including
waters shoreward of the EEZ boundary
around American Samoa, Guam,
Hawaii, the Northern Mariana Islands,
Midway, Johnston and Palmyra Atolls,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:17 Jun 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
Kingman Reef, and Wake, Jarvis, Baker,
and Howland Islands) and the adjacent
high seas waters.
Western Pacific Pelagic fisheries are
managed under regulations
implementing the FMP for the Pelagic
Fisheries of the Western Pacific Region
developed by the Western Pacific
Fishery Management Council (WPFMC).
The MSA regulations (50 CFR part 665,
subpart C) address target fish species as
well as bycatch of species protected
under the ESA, MMPA, and Migratory
Bird Treaty Act. The MSA regulations
outline restrictions on effort, observer
coverage requirements, longline fishing
prohibited areas, sea turtle and seabird
bycatch mitigation measures, annual
fleetwide limits on interactions with
leatherback and loggerhead sea turtles,
and a requirement for owners of
longline vessels to participate in annual
protected species workshops. Drift
gillnet fishing in the fishery
management area is prohibited, except
where authorized by an experimental
fishery permit.
The high seas components of the
Western Pacific Pelagic longline fishery
are extensions of the Category I ‘‘HI
deep-set (tuna target) longline/set line
fishery’’ and the Category II ‘‘HI
shallow-set (swordfish target) longline/
set line fishery’’ (proposed to be split
into two fisheries from the ‘‘HI
swordfish, tuna, billfish, mahi mahi,
wahoo, oceanic sharks longline/set line
fishery’’ in this proposed rule) operating
within U.S. waters. All requirements for
vessels fishing longline gear within U.S.
waters remain effective in high seas
waters (as described in the above
paragraph).
For more information on the Western
Pacific Pelagic fisheries and details on
the management and regulations of
these fisheries, please see the Western
Pacific Pelagic FMP BiOp (https://
www.fpir.noaa.gov/Library/PUBDOCs/),
the Western Pacific Pelagic FMP
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
(https://www.fpir.noaa.gov/Library/
PUBDOCs/), and the regulations for
Western Pacific Pelagic fisheries in 50
CFR 665, Subpart C.
High Seas South Pacific Albacore Troll
Fisheries
The South Pacific albacore troll high
seas fisheries target South Pacific
albacore using mostly longline or troll
gear in waters solely outside of any
nation’s EEZ. Longline gear, set with
1,000 or more hooks suspended from a
horizontally buoyed mainline several
miles long, accounts for 86 percent of
the catch. Trolling vessels (including
jigs or live bait) attach 10–20 fishing
lines of various lengths to the vessel’s
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
outriggers on a slow-moving boat (5–6
knots). The total U.S. catch of South
Pacific albacore has accounted for less
than 5 percent of the total international
catch in recent years.
U.S. vessels fish in the South Pacific
albacore fishery from November/
December-April. Many vessels then
participate in the larger North Pacific
albacore fishery from April-October.
South Pacific albacore fishing occurs
outside any nation’s EEZ in an area
bounded by approximately 110° W.
long. and 180° W. long., and by 25° S.
lat. and 45° S. lat. Most U.S. troll vessels
depart from the U.S. West Coast or
Hawaii and unload in American Samoa,
Fiji, or Tahiti.
The South Pacific albacore troll
fishery is not managed by regulations
implementing any FMP. The WPFMC
has concluded, and NMFS agrees, that
conservation and management measures
for this fishery are not warranted as the
stock in not overfished and there are no
known protected species interactions.
Sea turtles and marine mammals do not
prey on the bait species used by these
vessels and vessels are typically slowmoving and would therefore likely able
to avoid a collision with a whale. As of
2001, the HSFCA requires U.S. albacore
troll vessel operators to file logbooks
with NMFS for fishing in the South
Pacific.
For more information on the South
Pacific albacore troll fishery, please see
the 2004 U.S. South Pacific albacore
troll fishery Environmental Assessment
(EA) (https://www.fpir.noaa.gov/Library/
PUBDOCs/). There are no regulations
governing these fisheries.
High Seas South Pacific Tuna Fisheries
The South Pacific Tuna Treaty (SPTT)
manages access of U.S. purse seine
vessels targeting tuna (skipjack and
yellowfin) within the EEZs of 16 Pacific
Island Countries in the Western and
Central Pacific Ocean that are party to
the Treaty. The SPTT Area includes the
waters from north of 60° S. lat. and east
of 90° E. long. subject to the fishing
jurisdiction of Pacific Island parties, and
all waters within rhumb lines
connecting multiple geographic
coordinates, and north along the 152° E.
long. out to Australia’s EEZ border. The
Treaty Area includes portions of waters
in the EEZs of most of the Pacific Island
Countries included in the Treaty. The
SPTT is intended to apply only to U.S.
purse seine vessels; however, provisions
have been made to accommodate high
seas fishing by U.S. albacore tuna troll
and U.S. longline vessels within the
Treaty Area. Both a SPTT and a HSFCA
permit are required to fish in SPTT
waters.
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 115 / Friday, June 13, 2008 / Proposed Rules
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Under the SPTT, observers are
recruited from the Pacific Island
Countries and then trained and
deployed by the Forum Fisheries
Agency (FFA) in Honiara in the
Solomon Islands. Many of the FFA
deployed observers serve in and have
experience from domestic observer
programs active in each observer’s
respective country. The target observer
level coverage is 20 percent of U.S.
purse seine vessels, the full costs of
which are the responsibility of the U.S.
purse seine vessel owners. Observers
collect a range of data, including a form
for recording information on
interactions with seabirds, sea turtles,
marine mammals, and sharks. Fishery
observers undergo training in species
identification for target and bycatch
species; however, marine mammal
species identification has only recently
been placed as a priority matter for
reporting. Observer data from January
1997–June 2002 show that 11 sets
resulted in interactions with marine
mammals. However, the data indicate
only that the animals were
‘‘unidentified whales, marine mammals,
or dolphin/porpoise.’’ The International
Fisheries Division in the NMFS Pacific
Islands Region is working with the FFA
observer program to better train
observers in marine mammal
identification.
For additional information on the
South Pacific Tuna Treaty and details
on the management and regulations of
these fisheries, see the South Pacific
Tuna Treaty EA (https://
www.fpir.noaa.gov/Library/PUBDOCs/)
and the regulations for the South Pacific
Tuna Treaty in 50 CFR 300, subpart D.
High Seas Antarctic Living Marine
Resources Fisheries
The Commission for the Conservation
of Antarctic Marine Living Resources
(Convention or CCAMLR) conserves and
manages Antarctic marine living
resources (AMLR) in waters
surrounding Antarctica. The Convention
applies to AMLR in the waters from 60°
S. lat. south to the Antarctic
Convergence, with limited exceptions,
covering 32.9 million square kilometers.
Both an AMLR and a HSFCA permit are
required to fish in CCAMLR waters.
There are multiple gear types used to
target multiple species in the
Convention Area. Gear types include
pelagic and bottom trawl, trap/pot,
gillnet, and longline. Target species
include krill and Antarctic finfish
(rockcod species, toothfish species,
icefish species, silverfish, cod, and
lanternfish), mollusks, and crustaceans.
CCAMLR Conservation Measures
require or recommend several measures
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:17 Jun 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
for fisheries in the Convention area.
Mandatory measures include
requirements for reporting; operating a
Vessel Monitoring System while in the
Convention area; longline gear
modifications to reduce seabird
interactions; mesh sizes restrictions for
trawl gear. Recommendations include
seal bycatch mitigation measures, such
as a seal excluder device.
CCAMLR has identified two types of
scientifically trained observers to collect
information required in CCAMLRmanaged fisheries, including
information on entanglements and
incidental mortality of seabirds and
marine mammals. The first type of
observer is a ‘‘national observer,≥such
as a U.S. observer placed on a U.S.
vessel by the U.S. Government. The
second type of observer is an
‘‘international observer,’’ or an observer
operating in accordance with bilateral
arrangements between the Nation whose
vessel is fishing and the nation
providing the observer. CCAMLR
Conservation measures require all
fishing vessels in the Convention area
(except vessels fishing for krill) to carry
at least one international observer and,
where possible, an additional observer.
The United States requires all of its
vessels fishing in the CCAMLR area, for
any target species and with any gear, to
carry an observer. In certain exploratory
toothfish fisheries, the vessel must carry
two observers, with at least one being an
international observer.
For additional information on the
fishing activities in the CCAMLR region
and details on the management and
regulations of these fisheries, see the
CCAMLR Programmatic EIS https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/sfa/domeslfish/
newsloflnote.htm#ccamlr), the
CCAMLR Schedule of Conservation
Measures in Force (https://
www.ccamlr.org), and the regulations
for the harvesting of AMLR in 50 CFR
300, subpart D.
CA spot prawn pot
The ‘‘CA spot prawn pot fishery’’
(proposed to be listed as a Category II
in this rule) operates from Central CA
southward to the Mexican border.
Strings of 10–50 oblong cylindrical traps
are commonly fished at depths usually
greater than 100 fathoms. This is a
limited access fishery managed by the
state of CA. A tiered permit system has
been implemented allowing a maximum
of 150 or 500 traps to be fished at one
time depending on the fishing history
associated with the permit. A maximum
of 300 traps may be located within state
waters (inside 3 miles), regardless of
permit tier. North of Point Arguello, the
season is open from August 1–April 30.
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
33767
South of Point Arguello, the season runs
from February 1–October 30.
CA Dungeness crab pot
The ‘‘CA Dungeness crab pot fishery’’
(proposed to be listed as a Category II
in this rule) operates along the central
and northern coastal waters of CA in
depths typically from 10–40 fathoms.
The cylindrical or rectangular pots used
in the fishery are buoyed, or fished,
individually, although fishing strings of
multiple traps are allowed in the central
region. There is no limit on the number
of traps which may operated by a
fisherman at one time. This is a limited
access fishery managed in part by the
State of California and the Tri-State
Committee agreement for Dungeness
crab, which also includes the states of
OR and WA. The fishery is divided into
two management areas. The central
region (south of the Mendocino-Sonoma
county line) is open November 15–June
30. The northern region (north of the
Mendocino-Sonoma county line) can
open on December 1, but may be
delayed by the California Department of
Fish and Game (CDFG) based on the
condition of market crabs, and
continues until July 15.
OR Dungeness crab pot
The ‘‘OR Dungeness crab pot fishery’’
(proposed to be listed as a Category II
in this rule) operates along the coastal
waters of OR in depths typically from
10–40 fathoms. This is a limited access
fishery managed by the OR Department
of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) in
conjunction with the Tri-State
Committee agreement for Dungeness
crab, which also includes the states of
CA and WA. The Dungeness crab season
runs from December 1–August 14,
although the state may delay the
opening based on the condition of the
crabs. Additionally, the state may close
the season after the end of May if catch
rates are still high to protect molting
crab. A three-tiered pot limitation
system has been implemented allowing
a maximum 200, 300, or 500 pots to be
fished at once depending on previous
landing history. Logbook reporting of
effort and catch data to the state is now
required. The cylindrical or rectangular
pots used in the fishery are fished
individually by law.
WA/OR/CA sablefish pot
The ‘‘CA/OR/WA sablefish pot
fishery’’ (proposed to be listed as a
Category II in this rule) sets gear in
waters past the 100 fathom curve off the
West coast of the U.S. In CA, gear is set
outside 150 fathoms, with an average
depth of 190 fathoms. There are two
separate trap fisheries, open access and
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
33768
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 115 / Friday, June 13, 2008 / Proposed Rules
limited entry, and both have quotas.
Open access fishers will usually fish 1
to 8 strings of 3–4 pots, each with a float
line and buoy stick. The gear sometimes
soaks for long periods. Fishers in the
limited entry fishery will normally fish
20–30 pot strings. The fishery operates
year round and effort varies from
southern CA to the Canadian border.
This fishery is managed under
regulations implementing the West
Coast Groundfish FMP developed by
Pacific Fishery Management Council.
Access to the limited entry fishery is
granted under a limited entry permit
system, in addition to gear
endorsements required by the
individual states. Open access privileges
are currently available to any fisherman
with the requisite state gear
endorsement, but involve much more
restrictive limitations in catch quotas
and additional area closures than the
primary limited entry permit. Open
access quotas vary based upon the area
being fished. The limited entry fishery
is open from April 1–October 31, while
open access is available year-round.
Limited entry permits are tiered based
on the annual cumulative landings
allowed by each permit. Permits are
transferable, but the tier category
remains fixed. Up to three limited entry
permits may be stacked on a single
vessel. As with most pot gear fished out
in deeper waters, sablefish traps are set
in strings of multiple traps.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Summary of Changes to the LOF for
2009
The following summarizes changes to
the LOF for 2009 in fishery
classification, fisheries listed in the
LOF, the number of participants in a
particular fishery, and the species and/
or stocks that are incidentally killed or
seriously injured in a particular fishery.
The classifications and definitions of
U.S. commercial fisheries for 2009 are
identical to those provided in the LOF
for 2008 with the proposed changes
discussed below. State abbreviations
used in the following paragraphs
include: AK (Alaska), AL (Alabama), CA
(California), DE (Delaware), FL (Florida),
GA (Georgia), HI (Hawaii), LA
(Louisiana), MA (Massachusetts), ME
(Maine), MS (Mississippi), NC (North
Carolina), NJ (New Jersey), NY (New
York), OR (Oregon), RI (Rhode Island),
SC (South Carolina), TX (Texas), VA
(Virginia), and WA (Washington).
Commercial Fisheries on the High Seas
NMFS proposes to add high seas
fisheries to the LOF, beginning with the
2009 LOF. NMFS is soliciting public
comments on the proposed process for
including high seas fisheries on the LOF
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:17 Jun 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
(presented in the preamble under the
section ‘‘Are high seas fisheries
included on the LOF?’’), the fishery
descriptions for the authorized high seas
fisheries (presented in the preamble
under the section ‘‘Fishery
descriptions’’), and the proposed fishery
additions described below.
Addition of Fisheries to the LOF
High Seas Atlantic Highly Migratory
Species Fisheries
NMFS proposes to add the U.S.authorized high seas Atlantic HMS
fisheries to the LOF. The Atlantic HMS
high seas fisheries include all fisheries
using multiple gear types to target
Atlantic HMS (described in the ‘‘Fishery
Descriptions’’ section in the preamble of
this proposed rule). Due to the lack of
specific information on marine mammal
abundance and marine mammal-fishery
interactions on the high seas, NMFS
proposes to categorize all fisheries
targeting Atlantic HMS on the high seas
with gear other than longline and purse
seine (e.g., gillnet, trawl, handline, and
troll gear) as Category II. Category II is
the appropriate classification for new
fisheries on the LOF for which there is
little information on which to base
classification. NMFS proposes to
categorize the longline component of
this fishery as a Category I because it is
an extension of the Category I ‘‘Atlantic
Ocean, Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico large
pelagics longline’’ fishery operating
within U.S. waters. The gear used,
fishing methods, and target species are
the same, and longline vessels targeting
Atlantic HMS regularly cross into the
high seas, and back, when fishing.
NMFS proposes to categorize the purse
seine component of this fishery as a
Category III because it is an extension of
the Category III ‘‘U.S. Atlantic tuna
purse seine fishery’’ operating within
U.S. waters. There are 88 valid HSFCA
permits for fishers targeting Atlantic
HMS on the high seas with all gear
types. As noted in the preamble, the
number of valid permits may not
accurately account for annual fishing
effort on the high seas. Please see the
discussion on the HSFCA permitting
process under the section ‘‘Are high
seas fisheries included on the LOF?’’ in
the preamble of this proposed rule for
additional details.
Many marine mammal species
interacting with Atlantic HMS fisheries
operating in U.S. waters also inhabit the
high seas. Observer coverage for the
Category I pelagic longline fishery
extends into the high seas, so
information is available on which
marine mammal stocks are incidentally
taken by this fishery on the high seas.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
For this reason, NMFS proposes to list
the marine mammal species that have
been documented killed or injured in
the Category I high seas longline
component of Atlantic HMS fisheries in
Table 3.
Similar observer data are not available
for the high seas Atlantic HMS drift
gillnet fishery, which is an extension of
the Category II ‘‘Southeastern U.S.
Atlantic shark gillnet fishery’’; or the
purse seine fishery, which is an
extension of the Category III ‘‘Atlantic
tuna purse seine fishery.’’ For those
fisheries where no interaction data
(observer or other data) exist on the high
seas, NMFS proposes to list all the noncoastal marine mammal species/stocks
killed or injured in the portion of the
fishery that operates in U.S. waters as
injured or killed in the same fishery
operating on the high seas in Table 3.
Specifically, NMFS proposes to add all
non-coastal marine mammal species
killed or injured in the Category II
‘‘Southeastern U.S. Atlantic shark
gillnet fishery’’ (operating within U.S.
waters) as injured or killed in the
Category II drift gillnet component of
the Atlantic HMS fisheries (operating on
the high seas). Also, NMFS proposes to
list all non-coastal marine mammal
species killed or injured in the Category
III purse seine component of the
Atlantic HMS fisheries (operating
within U.S. waters) as injured or killed
in the Category III ‘‘Atlantic tuna purse
seine fishery’’ (operating on the high
seas).
There is little information on
interactions between marine mammals
and fishing gear used to target Atlantic
HMS on the high seas, other than that
listed in the previous paragraphs. Given
the lack of data on marine mammal
abundance and interactions with high
seas Atlantic HMS fisheries (excluding
the longline, drift gillnet, and purse
seine components), NMFS proposes to
list the marine mammal species killed
or injured in these fisheries as
‘‘undetermined’’ in Table 3.
High Seas Pacific Highly Migratory
Species Fisheries
NMFS proposes to add the U.S.authorized high seas Pacific HMS
fisheries to the LOF. The Pacific HMS
fisheries include all fisheries using
multiple gear types to target Pacific
HMS (described in the ‘‘Fishery
Descriptions’’ section in the preamble of
this proposed rule). Due to the lack of
specific information on marine mammal
abundance and interactions with Pacific
HMS high seas fisheries, NMFS
proposes to categorize all fisheries
targeting Pacific HMS on the high seas
with gear other than drift gillnet and
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 115 / Friday, June 13, 2008 / Proposed Rules
troll (e.g., longline, gillnet, trawl, purse
seine, and handline gear) as Category II.
Category II is the appropriate
classification for new fisheries on the
LOF for which there is little information
on which to base classification as
described in the definition for ‘‘Category
II’’ in 50 CFR 229.2. NMFS proposes to
categorize the drift gillnet component of
this fishery as a Category I because it is
an extension of the Category I ‘‘CA/OR
thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet
(≥14 in. mesh) fishery’’ operating within
U.S. waters. The gear used, fishing
methods, and target species are the same
in U.S. waters and on the high seas.
Similarly, NMFS proposes to categorize
the troll component of this fishery as a
Category III because it is an extension of
the Category III ‘‘AK North Pacific
halibut, AK bottom fish, WA/OR/CA
albacore, groundfish, bottom fish, CA
halibut non-salmonid troll fisheries’’
operating within U.S. waters.
There are 344 valid HSFCA permits
for fishers targeting Pacific HMS on the
high seas using all gear types. As noted
in the preamble, the number of valid
permits may not accurately account for
annual fishing effort on the high seas.
Please see the discussion on the HSFCA
permitting process under the section
‘‘Are high seas fisheries included on the
LOF?’’ in the preamble of this proposed
rule for additional details.
Many marine mammal species
interacting with Pacific HMS fisheries
operating in U.S. waters also inhabit the
high seas. Thus, fishing vessels that
cross into the high seas are also likely
to interact with these marine mammals
once they cross into the high seas. For
those fisheries where no interaction data
(observer or other data) exist on the high
seas, NMFS proposes to list all the noncoastal marine mammal species/stocks
killed or injured in the portion of the
fishery that operates in U.S. waters as
injured or killed in the same fishery
operating on the high seas in Table 3.
NMFS proposes to add all non-coastal
marine mammal species killed or
injured in the Category I ‘‘CA/OR
thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet
(>14 in mesh) fishery’’ (operating within
U.S. waters) as injured or killed in the
associated drift gillnet component of
Pacific HMS fisheries (operating on the
high seas).
NMFS proposes to add all non-coastal
marine mammal species killed or
injured in the Category II ‘‘CA tuna
purse seine fishery’’ (operating within
U.S. waters) as injured or killed in the
associated purse seine component of the
Pacific HMS fisheries (operating on the
high seas).
NMFS proposes to list all marine
mammal species killed or injured in the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:17 Jun 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
Category II ‘‘CA pelagic longline
fishery’’ as injured or killed in the
associated longline component of the
Pacific HMS fisheries (operating on the
high seas). This fishery is currently
prohibited within U.S. waters, but
remains listed on Table 1 because catch
is landed on the U.S. West coast.
Therefore, the marine mammal species
listed as killed or injured in this fishery
were observed taken on the high seas.
There is little information on
interactions between marine mammals
and fishing gear used to target Pacific
HMS on the high seas, other than that
listed in the previous paragraphs. Given
the lack of data on marine mammal
abundance and interactions with high
seas Pacific HMS fisheries (excluding
the longline, drift gillnet, and purse
seine components), NMFS proposes to
list the marine mammal species killed
or injured in these fisheries as
‘‘undetermined’’ in Table 3.
High Seas Western Pacific Pelagic
Fisheries
NMFS proposes to add the U.S.authorized high seas Western Pacific
pelagic fisheries to the LOF. The
Western Pacific pelagic fisheries include
all fisheries using multiple gear types to
target Western Pacific pelagic species
(described in the ‘‘Fishery Descriptions’’
section in the preamble of this proposed
rule). Due to the lack of specific
information on marine mammal
abundance and interactions with
fisheries on the high seas, NMFS
proposes to categorize all fisheries
targeting Western Pacific pelagic species
on the high seas with gear other than
longline (e.g., trawl, purse seine, pot,
handline, and troll gear) as Category II.
Category II is the appropriate
classification for new fisheries on the
LOF for which there is little information
on which to base classification, as
described in the definition for ‘‘Category
II’’ in 50 CFR 229.2. NMFS proposes to
categorize the deep-set longline
component of this fishery in U.S. waters
as Category I, and the shallow-set
longline component of this fishery in
U.S. waters as Category II, because they
are extensions of the Category I ‘‘ HI
deep-set (tuna target) longline/set line
fishery’’ and the Category II ‘‘HI
shallow-set (swordfish target) longline/
set line fishery,’’ respectively. (The ‘‘HI
swordfish, tuna, billfish, mahi mahi,
wahoo, oceanic sharks longline/set line
fishery’’ is proposed to be split into
these two fisheries in this proposed
rule, as stated below). The gear used,
fishing methods, and target species are
the same, and longline vessels targeting
Western Pacific pelagic species
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
33769
regularly cross over into the high seas
when fishing.
There are 219 valid HSFCA permits
for fishers targeting Western Pacific
pelagic species with all gear types on
the high seas. As noted in the preamble,
the number of valid permits may not
accurately account for annual fishing
effort on the high seas. Please see the
discussion on the HSFCA permitting
process under the section ‘‘Are high
seas fisheries included on the LOF?’’ in
the preamble of this proposed rule for
additional details.
Many marine mammal species are
also found on the high seas and the
Western Pacific pelagic fishery operates
the same on both sides of the EEZ
boundary. Fishing vessels that cross into
the high seas are likely to also interact
with these marine mammal stocks once
they cross the EEZ boundary. For those
fisheries where no interaction data
(observer or other data) exist on the high
seas, NMFS proposes to list all the noncoastal marine mammal species/stocks
killed or injured in the portion of the
fishery that operates in U.S. waters as
injured or killed in the same fishery
operating on the high seas in Table 3.
NMFS proposes to add all non-coastal
marine mammal species killed or
injured in the Category I ‘‘HI deep-set
(tuna target) longline/set line fishery’’
(operating within U.S. waters) as injured
or killed in the Category I ‘‘Western
Pacific Pelagic fishery (deep-set
component)’’ (operating on the high
seas).
NMFS proposes to add all non-coastal
marine mammal species killed or
injured in the Category II ‘‘HI shallowset (swordfish target) longline/set line
fishery’’ (operating within U.S. waters)
as injured or killed in the Category II
‘‘Western Pacific Pelagic fishery
(shallow-set component)’’ (operating on
the high seas).
There is little information on
interactions between marine mammals
and fishing gear used to target Western
Pacific pelagic species on the high seas,
other than that listed in the previous
paragraphs. Given the lack of data on
marine mammal abundance and
interactions with high seas Western
Pacific pelagic fisheries (excluding
longline effort), NMFS proposes to list
the marine mammal species killed or
injured in these fisheries as
‘‘undetermined’’ in Table 3.
High Seas South Pacific Albacore Troll
Fisheries
NMFS proposes to add the high seas
South Pacific albacore troll fisheries to
the LOF. While the main gear types
used are troll and longline, the South
Pacific albacore troll fisheries include
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
33770
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 115 / Friday, June 13, 2008 / Proposed Rules
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
all fisheries using multiple gear types to
target South Pacific albacore tuna.
While marine mammals are unlikely to
be injured or killed in troll gear because
of the nature of trolling methods and the
bait used (South Pacific Albacore Troll
EA), there is no official observer
program for this fishery. Therefore,
NMFS proposes to categorize all
fisheries targeting South Pacific albacore
on the high seas with trawl, purse seine,
pot, longline, handline, and troll gear as
Category II (the appropriate
classification for new fisheries on the
LOF for which there is little information
on which to base classification). There
are 83 valid HSFCA permits for vessels
participating in the South Pacific
albacore troll fisheries on the high seas
with all gear types. As noted in the
preamble, the number of valid permits
may not accurately account for annual
fishing effort on the high seas. Please
see the discussion on the HSFCA
permitting process under the section
‘‘Are high seas fisheries included on the
LOF?’’ in the preamble of this proposed
rule for additional details.
There are no records of incidental
mortality or serious injury of marine
mammals in the South Pacific albacore
troll fisheries. While there is little
indication of marine mammal
interactions with South Pacific albacore
troll fishing, NMFS proposes to list the
marine mammal species killed or
injured in these fisheries as
‘‘undetermined’’ in Table 3 due to the
lack of an observer program covering
these fisheries.
High Seas South Pacific Tuna Fisheries
NMFS proposes to add the high seas
South Pacific tuna fisheries, as
authorized under the South Pacific
Tuna Treaty, to the LOF. While a formal
observer program exists for fishing in
the Treaty area, information on marine
mammal stock abundance in the area is
scarce and observer reports of fishery
interactions are not yet specific enough
to determine the level of marine
mammal serious injury and mortality.
Therefore, NMFS proposes to categorize
all fisheries participating in the South
Pacific tuna fishery as Category II (the
appropriate classification for new
fisheries on the LOF for which there is
little information on which to base
classification). There are 26 valid
HSFCA permits for vessels participating
in the South Pacific tuna fishery. This
number is considered to accurately
reflect the effort by U.S. vessels in the
SPTT area because it closely matches
the number of U.S. vessels with a valid
SPTT license.
Under the SPTT, U.S. purse seine
vessels are observed with a target of 20
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:17 Jun 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
percent coverage. While observer data
document interactions with marine
mammals, the data only currently
identify the animals as unidentified
whales, marine mammals, or dolphin/
porpoise. For this reason, Table 3 lists
the marine mammal species killed/
injured in these fisheries as
‘‘undetermined.’’
High Seas Antarctic Living Marine
Resources Fisheries
NMFS proposes to add the high seas
Antarctic Living Marine Resources (or
CCAMLR) fisheries to the LOF. The
CCAMLR fisheries include all fisheries
using multiple gear types to target living
marine resources in the CCAMLR region
(described in the ‘‘Fishery Descriptions’’
section in the preamble of this proposed
rule). While a formal observer program
exists for fishing under CCAMLR,
specific information on marine mammal
abundance and fishery interactions
levels has not been calculated in the
manner necessary to categorize the
fisheries based on a marine mammal
stock’s PBR (as described in the
preamble). Therefore, NMFS proposes to
categorize all fisheries operating in the
CCAMLR region as Category II (the
appropriate classification for new
fisheries on the LOF for which there is
little information on which to base
classification). There are no valid
HSFCA permits for vessels participating
in the CCAMLR fisheries for the 2008
fishing season, which accurately reflects
effort by U.S. vessels in the CCAMLR
area. Therefore, CCAMLR fisheries do
not appear on Table 3 (Commercial
Fisheries on the High Seas) in this
proposed rule. When a HSFCA permit is
requested and granted for a U.S. vessel
to participate in the CCAMLR fisheries,
this information will appear in Table 3
of the LOF.
In fishing seasons prior to 2004,
Antarctic fur seals have been observed
incidentally injured and killed by U.S.
vessels in the CCAMLR trawl fishery for
krill. These takes were drastically
reduced in the 2004/2005 fishing season
due to a requirement to include a seal
excluder device on all trawls (CCAMLR
EA). Due to the large population size of
Antarctic fur seals, the current low rate
of serious injury and mortality is likely
not a conservation risk. There are no
documented interactions between other
marine mammal species and U.S.
vessels when using other gear types in
the CCAMLR region.
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Commercial Fisheries in the Pacific
Ocean
Fishery Classification
HI swordfish, tuna, billfish, mahi mahi,
wahoo, oceanic sharks longline/set line
fishery
NMFS proposes to split the Category
I ‘‘HI swordfish, tuna, billfish, mahi
mahi, wahoo, oceanic sharks longline/
set line fishery’’ (hereinafter the current
HI-based longline fishery) and list it in
the 2009 LOF as two separately
managed commercial fisheries: (1) The
‘‘HI deep-set (tuna target) longline/set
line fishery≥; and (2) the ‘‘HI shallowset (swordfish target) longline/set line
fishery.’’ NMFS believes such a split is
warranted because the shallow-set and
deep-set fisheries have different target
species, operating patterns, management
regimes, and marine mammal
interaction rates. See the Fishery
Descriptions section in the Final 2008
LOF for additional information (72 FR
66048; November 27, 2007). NMFS has
split other fisheries in prior LOFs based
upon similar factors.
The current HI-based longline fishery
is listed as a Category I fishery as a
result of the fishery’s serious injuries or
mortalities to false killer whales
(Pseudorca crassidens), which currently
exceed the stock’s PBR. NMFS proposes
that splitting the current HI-based
longline fishery into two fisheries for
purposes of the LOF would result in a
Category I deep-set fishery and a
Category II shallow-set fishery. The
definitions for the fishery classification
criteria can be found in the
implementing regulations for section
118 of the MMPA (50 CFR 229.2) and
in the preamble of this proposed rule.
The ‘‘HI deep-set (tuna target)
longline/set line fishery’’ will remain a
Category I fishery because the fishery’s
serious injuries or mortalities to false
killer whales currently exceed the
stock’s PBR. Observer coverage in the
deep-set fishery is approximately 20
percent annually.
The ‘‘HI shallow-set (swordfish target)
longline/set line fishery’’ was closed
from 2001 to 2004. Since 2004, this
fishery has been subject to strict
management measures including:
prescribed use of large circle hooks and
fish bait, restricted annual effort, annual
limits on turtle captures, and 100–
percent onboard observer coverage
because of sea turtle interactions. NMFS
considered data from 2004 to 2007 in
the tier analysis, which takes into
account operation of the shallow-set
fishery under this new management
regime. While there were no
documented interactions with false
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 115 / Friday, June 13, 2008 / Proposed Rules
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
killer whales in the shallow-set fishery
during this period, there have been
observed serious injuries or mortalities
to the following marine mammal stocks:
Risso’s dolphin (Grampus griseus) (one
serious injury in 2005; one serious
injury and one mortality in 2006; three
serious injuries in 2007); bottlenose
dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) (one
serious injury in 2006; three serious
injuries in 2007); and humpback whale
(Megaptera novaeangliae) (one serious
injury in 2006). There was also an
interaction with a Bryde’s whale
(Balaenoptera edeni) in 2005 that did
not result in a serious injury or
mortality.
Each of these serious injuries or
mortalities occurred outside U.S.
waters. Section 117(a) of the MMPA
requires NMFS to prepare a draft stock
assessment for each marine mammal
stock which occurs in waters under the
jurisdiction of the United States. Each
draft stock assessment must include,
among other things, an estimate of the
PBR level for the stock. Because the
serious injuries and mortality of Risso’s
dolphins and bottlenose dolphins
occurred outside U.S. waters, there is no
PBR for these stocks upon which to
conduct a tier analysis (as described in
the preamble of this proposed rule).
However, there is a high degree of
certainty that the humpback whale from
the 2006 interaction was from the
Central North Pacific stock of humpback
whales, which migrates seasonally
between breeding grounds in HI and
foraging areas in AK. The PBR of this
stock is 12.9; the annual mortality and
serious injury of this stock in the
shallow set fishery is 1.94 percent of
PBR (one animal during the four-year
period 2004–2007, or 0.25 per year).
Because the annual mortality and
serious injury of this humpback whale
stock is greater than 1 percent and less
than 50 percent of the PBR level, NMFS
has determined that the shallow-set
portion of the longline fishery merits
recategorization as a Category II fishery.
CA angel shark/halibut and other
species set gillnet (>3.5 in mesh)
NMFS proposes to reclassify the ‘‘CA
angel shark/halibut and other species
set gillnet (>3.5 mesh size) fishery’’
(proposed to be renamed ‘‘CA halibut/
white seabass and other species set
gillnet (>3.5 in mesh) fishery’’ in this
proposed rule) from a Category I to a
Category II fishery. This fishery was
classified as Category I due to serious
injury and mortality to the Monterey
Bay and Morro Bay stocks of central CA
harbor porpoises. Since 2002, however,
there has been a ban on set gillnetting
in central CA. As a result, effort in this
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:17 Jun 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
fishery shifted and is now concentrated
in southern CA, south of the range of
these harbor porpoise stocks. The
elimination of this fishery from the
stocks’ range removed the threat of
mortality and serious injury to the
stocks. Because interactions ceased as of
2002, no tier analysis was conducted for
the level of annual mortality and serious
injury of these stocks in this fishery for
this proposed reclassification. The mean
annual mortality and serious injury of
CA sea lions in this fishery is 1,138, or
13 percent of PBR (PBR=8,511); the
mean annual mortality and serious
injury of harbor seals (CA stock) is 386,
which is 20 percent of PBR
(PBR=1,896). Thus, the mean annual
serious injury and mortality of CA sea
lions and harbor seals (CA stock) in this
fishery is greater than 1–percent and
less than 50 percent of the stocks’ PBR
levels, thereby further supporting a
Category II classification. Observer
coverage in this fishery is approximately
5 percent.
West Coast trap/pot fisheries
NMFS proposes the recategorization
of various West Coast trap and pot
fisheries from Category III to Category II
based on interactions with humpback
whales (CA/OR/WA stock). Below,
NMFS provides a review of the analysis
conducted to support the proposed
recategorizations. Comments are
specifically requested from the public
on the proposed recategorizations of
these fisheries.
From January 1, 2002, through
December 31, 2006, NMFS documented
13 sightings of free-swimming
humpback whales entangled in trap
gear, pot gear, or unidentified gear along
the U.S. West Coast. Twelve of the
thirteen observations occurred off the
coast of CA and one was off the coast
of OR. One stranded dead humpback
whale was reported in OR, and it is
believed that this humpback whale was
one of the 13 free-swimming entangled
whales reported to NMFS.
A review of the available data from
the NMFS Large Whale Disentanglement
Network (LWDN) was initiated to
understand the nature of the 13
entangled humpback whales (Table 5).
Four animals were observed with pots
or traps on their bodies during the
reported entanglement, including one
with spot prawn gear and one with
sablefish gear. Of these, three were not
disentangled from the gear and, due to
the amount of trailing gear reported on
these animals, these three are
considered seriously injured. One of the
four observed entangled animals was
disentangled from pot gear and released
without injury; however, the animal
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
33771
would have been considered seriously
injured if it had not been observed,
tracked, and disentangled. One whale
was observed off OR entangled in gear
which has been identified as likely to
have been Dungeness crab pot gear
based upon photos of the animal. An
additional three humpback whales were
reported to NMFS as being entangled in
crabpot line, although there is no way
to determine if the line was actually
from pot or trap gear. Five humpback
whales were reported to NMFS
entangled in line or netting, with no
means of identifying the type of fishing
gear involved. Details of these
entanglements can be found in Table 5.
For this analysis, NMFS has been
conservative in attributing records of
entanglements to the pot and traps
fisheries. It is difficult to identify fishing
gear based upon observations of gear on
animals; for most reports there are no
photographs of the animals. Therefore,
only confirmed and probable
entanglements of humpback whales are
attributed to a particular pot/trap
fishery. Using this criterion, it is
estimated that four humpback whales
were seriously injured or killed between
2002 and 2006 due to entanglements
with pot or trap gear. This number
should be considered a minimum
estimate of seriously injured animals
because it is based upon opportunistic
sightings reported to NMFS and thus do
not represent observer data or
comprehensive surveys. The entire
record of seriously injured or killed
humpback whales is used in the Tier 1
evaluation, but only the three confirmed
serious injuries are used in the Tier 2
evaluation of the pot and trap fisheries.
Tier 1 evaluation: NMFS began by
considering the total annual mortality
and serious injury of the CA/OR/WA
humpback whale stock across all U.S.
fisheries. The draft 2008 SARs lists the
total observed mortalities and serious
injuries of humpback whales from 2002
through 2006 as 13 (this number
includes one animal reported to the
NMFS entangled in unidentified gillnet
gear). This results in an annual mean
take of 2.6 humpback whales per year,
which exceeds 10 percent of the PBR
level (2.5) for this stock.
Tier 2 evaluation: Three humpback
whales (CA/OR/WA) have been
positively identified as being entangled
and seriously injured in pot/trap gear
between January 1, 2002, and December
31, 2006. A single serious injury or
mortality of a humpback whale in a
trap/pot fishery results in a level of take
of 0.2 animals per year, or 8 percent of
the PBR (PBR=2.5 animals), which is
consistent with a Category II
categorization (the total estimated
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
33772
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 115 / Friday, June 13, 2008 / Proposed Rules
annual serious injury of mortality is
greater than 1 percent and less than 50
percent of PBR). Category II is also the
appropriate category for fisheries for
which reliable information on the
frequency of marine mammal serious
injury or mortalities is lacking. Fisheries
are placed in Category II after evaluating
such factors as the type of gear being
used, stranding records, the distribution
of marine mammals in the area of the
fishery, and at the discretion of the
Assistant Administrator for Fisheries
(see 50 CFR 229.3). As described in the
2007 Final LOF (72 FR 14466, March 28,
2007), the available information from
the LWDN alone is not sufficient to
identify which of the numerous pot and
trap fisheries may interact with
humpback whales and cause serious
injuries or mortalities. Therefore, other
methods must be used to determine
which pot and trap fisheries should be
listed as Category II.
As described in the 2008 Final LOF
(72 FR 66048, November 27, 2007),
NMFS recently prepared, with
assistance from the states, a
characterization of the current
commercial trap/pot fisheries off the
CA, OR, and WA coasts. NMFS has also
been working closely with the states to
obtain the best available information on
these trap/pot fisheries and has
integrated this into its analysis. NMFS
used the reported entanglement of
humpback whales as the data that drives
the recategorization of some fisheries.
As part of the analysis, some
assumptions were necessary and are
outlined here. NMFS assumes that the
time and area in which the
entanglement was reported is the
location where the entanglement
occurred, as with a humpback whale
entangled off San Francisco in
December 2005. NMFS acknowledges
that it is possible that a whale could
travel from other areas carrying gear.
NMFS also assumes that the reported
entanglements are a fraction of the total
mortalities and serious injury caused by
trap/pot gear, and the reports are best
used to represent areas where fisheries
and humpback whales interact. Under
this assumption, all entanglements
characterized as confirmed
entanglements in trap/pot gear and
unconfirmed but probable entanglement
with trap/pot gear (see Table 5) were
used to determine which commercial
fisheries are most likely to interact with
humpback whales. Finally, NMFS
assumed that the distribution of trap/pot
fishing effort and the distribution of
humpback whales are not likely to
drastically change in the near future;
therefore, past interactions are
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:17 Jun 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
reasonable predictors of future events.
NMFS acknowledges that
environmental variability can change
the distribution of fishing effort and
marine mammals; NMFS will continue
to monitor both and make
recommendations for changes to the
LOF as appropriate.
To determine which pot and trap
fisheries should be listed as Category II,
NMFS asked the following questions: (1)
Has the fishery been identified as
causing one of the entanglements of
humpback whales?; and (2) Does the
fishery operate in the area and time
when a humpback was reported
entangled in pot and trap gear? Fisheries
that did not meet either of these
criterion were eliminated from possibly
causing humpback whale mortalities or
serious injuries and remained Category
III fisheries.
Once NMFS identified which
fisheries met either of the criterion
above, NMFS considered the following:
(1) Does the fishery overlap, spatially
and temporally, with the known
distribution of the Eastern North Pacific
stock of humpback whales?; and (2)
Does the fishery currently have a
substantial amount of effort and is there
likely to be change in this level of effort
in the future? These second two
questions address whether future
interactions, based upon observed
entanglements, would be likely. NMFS
considered these factors because while
one observed interaction may be
insufficient to recategorize a fishery; a
likelihood of entanglement supports the
recategorization of some fisheries.
Based on the analysis described
above, the following are being proposed
to be classified as Category II fisheries
(all were Category III on the 2008 LOF
or included within the Category III ‘‘CA
lobster, prawn, shrimp, rock crab, fish
pot’’ [proposed to be renamed the ‘‘CA
spiny lobster, coonstrip shrimp, finfish,
rock crab, tanner crab pot or trap’’]):
(1) The ‘‘CA spot prawn pot fishery’’
(see name change explanation for this
fishery described below under ‘‘West
Coast trap/pot fisheries’’ discussion in
section ‘‘Fishery Name and
Organizational Changes and
Clarifications’’) as a Category II fishery.
A humpback whale was reported
entangled and seriously injured in this
gear type in September 2005 at
Monterey. As described above, a single
humpback whale serious injury or
mortality is equal to 8 percent of the
stock’s PBR; therefore, a Category II
categorization is appropriate. The
estimated number of vessels or
participants in the ‘‘CA spot prawn pot
fishery’’ is 29.
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(2) The ‘‘WA/OR/CA sablefish pot
fishery’’. A humpback whale was
reported entangled in this gear type in
September 2006 off Monterey, CA. As
described above, a single humpback
whale serious injury or mortality is
equal to 8 percent of the stock’s PBR;
therefore, a Category II categorization is
appropriate. The estimated number of
vessels or participants in the ‘‘WA/OR/
CA sablefish pot fishery’’ is 155,
including both limited and open access
permits (there are 32 limited access
permits).
(3) The ‘‘OR Dungeness crab pot
fishery’’ (see name change explanation
for this fishery described below under
‘‘West Coast trap/pot fisheries’’
discussion in section ‘‘Fishery Name
and Organizational Changes and
Clarifications’’). A humpback whale was
observed and photographed entangled
in gear in May 2006 off the coast of OR.
This animal is believed to be the same
animal that stranded on a beach in OR
with marks consistent with the type of
entanglement observed. Based upon the
gear observed on the animal in the field
and in photographs, and the unusually
high amount of Dungeness crab gear in
the water during that time, it is most
likely that this is the type of gear that
entangled the animal. As described
above, a single humpback whale serious
injury or mortality is equal to 8 percent
of the stock’s PBR; therefore, a Category
II categorization is appropriate. The
estimated number of vessels or
participants in the ‘‘OR Dungeness crab
pot fishery’’ is 433 (433 permits exist,
364 landings were made in 2006).
(4) The ‘‘CA Dungeness crab pot
fishery’’ (see name change explanation
for this fishery described below under
‘‘West Coast trap/pot fisheries’’
discussion in section ‘‘Fishery Name
and Organizational Changes and
Clarifications’’). Two of the reported
humpback whale entanglements (shown
in Table 5) could not be identified to a
type of pot or trap fishery by gear type,
thus NMFS considered whether this
fishery could be listed as Category II by
analogy to other West Coast trap/pot
fisheries proposed for Category II
classification in this rule, because it
operates with similar gear in the same
location as confirmed humpback whale
serious injury events. NMFS reviewed
the entanglements and identified which
pot and trap fisheries were operating in
the time and area of the reported
entanglements. The ‘‘CA Dungeness
crab pot’’ and the ‘‘CA spot prawn trap’’
fisheries were both operating at the time
and place of the two humpback whale
entanglements, thus either of these
could have caused the serious injury to
the humpback whales. Therefore, NMFS
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 115 / Friday, June 13, 2008 / Proposed Rules
proposes to reclassify the ‘‘CA
Dungeness crab pot fishery’’ as a
Category II fishery by analogy. The
estimated number of vessels or
participants in the ‘‘CA Dungeness crab
pot fishery’’ is 625 (625 permits exist,
435 landings were made in 2006).
NMFS acknowledges that other pot
and trap fisheries may overlap in space
and time with humpback whales
feeding or migrating along the West
Coast, but in the absence of evidence of
interactions, NMFS cannot justify
placing these fisheries in Category II at
this time. If additional information
becomes available, NMFS will consider
recategorization of other trap/pot
fisheries.
NMFS also reviewed the level of gray
whale takes in all West coast
commercial fisheries, including trap and
pot fisheries, and determined that it was
well below 10 percent of the stock’s
PBR, thus re-categorization of trap and
pot fisheries based upon gray whale
takes is not warranted. Entanglements of
gray whales in trap and pot gear have
been reported; however, NMFS has not
yet determined which specific fisheries
may be involved. Therefore, gray whales
will remain listed under the Category
III, ‘‘CA lobster, prawn, shrimp, rock
crab, fish pot fishery’’ (proposed to be
renamed as the ‘‘CA spiny lobster,
coonstripe shrimp, finfish, rock crab,
tanner crab pot or trap fishery’’ in this
proposed rule) and under the proposed
Category II trap and pot fisheries
discussed below (gray whales have been
listed as injured or killed in these
fisheries since the 2005 and 2007 LOFs,
respectively). Data related to
interactions with gray whales and the
newly categorized Category II trap and
pot fisheries will be reviewed and
discussed in future LOFs.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Addition of Fisheries to the LOF
NMFS proposes to add the ‘‘HI deepset (tuna target) longline/set line
fishery’’ as a Category I (see the
discussion in the previous section for
details).
NMFS proposes to add the ‘‘HI
shallow-set (swordfish target) longline/
set line fishery’’ as a Category II (see the
discussion in the previous section for
details).
NMFS proposes to add the ‘‘CA spot
prawn trap fishery’’ as a Category II (see
the discussion in the previous section
for details).
NMFS proposes to add the ‘‘CA
Dungeness crab pot fishery’’ as a
Category II (see the discussion in the
previous section for details).
NMFS proposes to add the ‘‘OR
Dungeness crab pot fishery’’ as a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:17 Jun 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
Category II (see the discussion in the
previous section for details).
NMFS proposes to add the ‘‘WA
Dungeness crab pot fishery’’ as a
Category III (see the discussion in the
previous section for details).
NMFS proposes to add ‘‘AK statewide
miscellaneous finfish pot fishery’’ as a
Category III fishery. There are 293
participants in this fishery and no
documented takes of marine mammals.
NMFS proposes to add ‘‘AK shrimp
pot, except Southeast fishery’’ as a
Category III fishery. There are 15
participants in this fishery and no
documented takes of marine mammals.
Removal of Fisheries from the LOF
NMFS propose to remove the
Category II ‘‘AK Metlakatla/Annette
Island salmon drift gillnet’’ fishery from
the LOF. NMFS received a comment on
the 2008 LOF stating that this fishery is
an exclusively tribal fishery (72 FR
66048, November 27, 2007, comment/
response 27). As an exclusively tribal
fishery, this fishery is not subject to the
LOF (Final rule implementing section
118 of the MMPA, 60 FR 45086, August
30, 1995, comment/response 68). Tribal
governments have developed
regulations for the management of tribal
fishing under treaties. NMFS and other
fisheries regulatory agencies have
participated with the tribes during this
regulatory development.
Fishery Name and Organizational
Changes and Clarifications
NMFS proposes to change the name of
the ‘‘CA angel shark/halibut and other
species set gillnet (>3.5 mesh size)’’
fishery to the ‘‘CA halibut/white seabass
and other species set gillnet (>3.5 in.
mesh) fishery’’ to more accurately
reflect the current target species of the
fishery.
NMFS proposes to change the name of
the Category III ‘‘AK state-managed
waters groundfish longline/set line
(including sablefish, rockfish, and
miscellaneous finfish’’ to ‘‘AK statemanaged waters longline/set line
(including sablefish, rockfish, lingcod,
and miscellaneous finfish’’ to more
accurately reflect the current target
species of the fishery.
NMFS proposes to change the name of
the Category III ‘‘AK North Pacific
halibut handline and mechanical jig
fishery’’ to ‘‘AK North Pacific halibut
handline/hand troll and mechanical jig
fishery’’ to more accurately reflect the
gear used in the fishery.
NMFS proposes to change the name of
the Category III ‘‘AK miscellaneous
finfish handline and mechanical jig
fishery’’ to ‘‘AK miscellaneous finfish
handline/hand troll and mechanical jig
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
33773
fishery’’ to more accurately reflect the
gear used in the fishery.
NMFS proposes to remove the
superscript ‘‘1’’ following Steller sea
lion, Western U.S. stock, under the
Category II ‘‘AK Bristol Bay salmon drift
gillnet fishery’’ in Table 1. Although
Steller sea lions (Western U.S. stock)
were reported taken in this fishery in
logbook entries prior to the 1996 LOF
(2007 SAR, Appendix 7), there have
been no reported interactions since
1993. Therefore, this Steller sea lion
stock is not driving the categorization of
this fishery. However, this fishery is
classified as a Category II based on
analogy with other Category II AK
gillnet fisheries because it operates in
the same manner as other AK gillnet
fisheries and it has not been observed by
the Alaska Marine Mammal Observer
Program. Therefore, the superscript ‘‘2’’
will remain after the fishery’s name in
Table 1.
West Coast trap/pot fisheries
NMFS conducted a review of all West
Coast commercial pot and trap fisheries
in response to reports of humpback
whale entanglements in this gear type
and public comment requests for a
review on previous LOFs. As described
in the ‘‘Fishery Classification’’ section
above, NMFS is proposing to
recategorize a number of West Coast
commercial pot and trap fisheries based
upon interactions with humpback
whales. The fisheries as currently
named do not allow NMFS to categorize
them appropriately, thus NMFS
proposes to rename certain West Coast
trap/pot fisheries by splitting and
combining them based upon the
probability of interactions with the gear
and humpback whales and the current
management structure.
NMFS proposes to split the prawn
portion of the ‘‘CA lobster, prawn,
shrimp, rock crab, and fish pot fishery’’
into a separate fishery, the ‘‘CA spot
prawn fishery,’’ and rename the
remaining portion of the fishery the ‘‘CA
spiny lobster, coonstripe shrimp,
finfish, rock crab, tanner crab pot or trap
fishery.’’ NMFS has determined that the
current name of the fishery does not
reflect the current fisheries and
proposes to list the ‘‘CA spot prawn trap
fishery’’ as a separate Category II fishery
due to an observed entanglement with a
humpback whale. Further, the ‘‘CA spot
prawn trap fishery’’ operates in a time
and area when humpback whales are
found off of the coast of CA. NMFS
proposes to rename the remaining
portion of the fishery the ‘‘CA spiny
lobster, coonstripe shrimp, finfish, rock
crab, tanner crab pot or trap fishery’’
because these fisheries are all managed
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
33774
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 115 / Friday, June 13, 2008 / Proposed Rules
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
by the State of CA and the available data
from the LWDN shows a low likelihood
of interactions with humpback whales
because of the areas and times in which
fishery effort occurs and the amount of
gear used in these fisheries. This fishery
will remain a Category III fishery on the
LOF.
NMFS proposes to list the ‘‘CA spot
prawn trap fishery’’ as a separate
Category II fishery due to an observed
entanglement with a humpback whale.
Further, this fishery operates in a time
and area when humpback whales are
found off of the coast of CA.
NMFS proposes to split the ‘‘WA/OR/
CA crab pot fishery’’ into three fisheries,
the ‘‘CA Dungeness crab pot,’’ ‘‘OR
Dungeness crab pot,’’ and ‘‘WA
Dungeness crab pot’’ fisheries. Each of
these fisheries is managed and
permitted by the individual states and
each state has different regulations and
regulatory capacity for their fishery.
Also, as explained previously,
humpback whale entanglements have
occurred in Dungeness crab pot gear off
the states of CA and OR, but not WA.
Thus by splitting and re-naming this
fishery, NMFS is able to appropriately
categorize only those Dungeness crab
pot fisheries that are of most concern
due to marine mammal interactions (i.e.,
categorize the CA and OR Dungeness
crab pot fisheries as Category II, and the
WA Dungeness crab pot fishery as
Category III).
Number of Vessels/Persons
NMFS proposes to update the
estimated number of vessels or persons
in the Category III ‘‘CA lobster, prawn,
shrimp, rock crab, and fish pot fishery’’
(proposed to be renamed the ‘‘CA spiny
lobster, coonstripe shrimp, finfish, rock
crab, tanner crab pot or trap fishery’’ in
this rule) from 608 to 530.
NMFS proposes to update the
estimated number of vessels or persons
in the Category III ‘‘OR/CA hagfish pot
or trap fishery’’ from 25 to 54.
NMFS proposes to update the
estimated number of vessels or persons
in the majority of the AK Category II
fisheries because the information has
not been updated in recent LOFs: AK
Southeast salmon drift gillnet fishery
from 481 to 476; AK Yakutat salmon set
gillnet from 170 to 166; AK Prince
William Sound salmon drift gillnet from
541 to 537; AK Cook Inlet salmon drift
gillnet from 576 to 571; AK Cook Inlet
salmon set gillnet from 745 to 738; AK
Peninsula/Aleutian Islands salmon drift
gillnet from 164 to 162; AK Peninsula/
Aleutian Islands salmon set gillnet from
116 to 115; AK Bristol Bay salmon drift
gillnet from 1,903 to 1,862; AK Bristol
Bay salmon set gillnet from 1,014 to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:17 Jun 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
983; AK Southeast salmon purse seine
fishery from 416 to 415; AK Bering Sea,
Aleutian Islands pollock trawl from 120
to 95; AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands
Pacific cod trawl from 114 to 54; AK
Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands finfish
trawl from 26 to 34.
NMFS proposes to update the
estimated number of vessels or persons
in the majority of the AK Category III
fisheries because the information has
not been updated in recent LOFs: AK
Kuskokwim, Yukon, Norton Sound,
Kotzebue salmon gillnet from 1,922 to
1,824 ; AK roe herring and food/bait
herring gillnet from 2,034 to 986; AK
miscellaneous finfish set gillnet from 3
to 0; AK salmon purse seine (except
Southeast AK, which is Category II)
from 953 to 936; AK salmon beach seine
from 34 to 31; AK roe herring and food/
bait herring purse seine from 624 to 361;
AK roe herring and food/bait herring
beach seine from 8 to 4; AK octopus/
squid purse seine from 2 to 0; AK
salmon troll from 2,335 to 2,045; AK
North Pacific halibut/bottom fish troll
from 1,530 (330 AK) to 1,302 (102 AK);
AK state-managed waters groundfish
longline/set line (including sablefish,
rockfish, and miscellaneous finfish)
from 731 to 1,448; AK Gulf of Alaska
rockfish longline from 421 to 0; AK Gulf
of Alaska sablefish longline from 412 to
291; AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands
Greenland turbot longline from 12 to 29;
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands
rockfish longline from 17 to 0; AK
Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands sablefish
longline from 63 to 28; AK halibut
longline/set line (State and Federal
waters) from 3,079 to 2,521; AK
octopus/squid longline from 7 to 2; AK
shrimp otter and beam trawl (statewide
and Cook Inlet) from 58 to 32; AK Gulf
of Alaska flatfish trawl from 52 to 41;
AK Gulf of Alaska Pacific cod trawl
from 101 to 62; AK Gulf of Alaska
pollock trawl from 83 to 62; AK Gulf of
Alaska rockfish trawl from 45 to 34; AK
Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands Atka
mackerel trawl from 8 to 9; AK Bering
Sea, Aleutian Islands Pacific cod trawl
from 87 to 93; AK Bering Sea, Aleutian
Islands rockfish trawl from 9 to 10; AK
miscellaneous finfish otter or beam
trawl from 624 to 317; AK food/bait
herring trawl from 3 to 4; AK Bering
Sea, Aleutian Islands Pacific cod pot
from 76 to 68; AK Bering Sea, Aleutian
Islands crab pot from 329 to 297; AK
Gulf of Alaska crab pot from unknown
to 300; AK Southeast Alaska crab pot
from unknown to 433; AK Southeast
Alaska shrimp pot from unknown to
283; AK octopus/squid pot from 72 to
27; AK snail pot from 2 to 1; AK North
Pacific halibut handline/hand troll and
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
mechanical jig from 93 to 228; AK
miscellaneous finfish handline/hand
troll and mechanical jig from 100 to 445;
AK octopus/squid handline form 2 to 0;
AK Southeast herring roe/food/bait
pound net from 3 to 6; AK dungeness
crab (hand pick/dive) from 3 to 2; AK
herring spawn on kelp (hand pick/dive)
from 363 to 266; AK urchin and other
fish/shellfish (hand pick/dive) from 471
to 570; AK commercial passenger
fishing vessel from >7,000 (1,107 AK) to
>7,000 (2,702 AK).
List of Species That are Incidentally
Injured or Killed
NMFS proposes to remove the harbor
porpoise (central CA) from the list of
marine mammal species and stocks
incidentally killed/injured in the ‘‘CA
angel shark/halibut and other species
set gillnet (>3.5 mesh size) fishery’’
(proposed for recategorization to a
Category II, and renamed as the ‘‘CA
halibut/white seabass and other species
set gillnet (>3.5 mesh size) fishery’’ in
this proposed rule). As described above,
there has been a ban on set gillnetting
in central CA since 2002, which has
eliminated the threat to the Monterey
Bay stock and Morro Bay stock of harbor
porpoise in this fishery. This fishery is
now concentrated in southern
California, south of the range of these
stocks of harbor porpoise.
NMFS proposes to remove the
following marine mammals from the list
of species/stocks incidentally killed/
injured in the ‘‘CA/OR thresher shark/
swordfish drift gillnet (≥14 in. mesh)
fishery≥: Dall’s porpoise (CA/OR/WA),
fin whale (CA/OR/WA), gray whale
(Eastern North Pacific), humpback
whale (CA/OR/WA), and sperm whale
(CA/OR/WA). None of these species
have been observed taken in the fishery
from January 1, 2002 through December
31, 2006 (the most recent available
information). This fishery has been
observed by NMFS at approximately 20
percent annually during this five year
period.
NMFS proposes to remove humpback
whales (CA/OR/WA) from the list of
species/stocks incidentally killed/
injured in the Category II ‘‘WA
Dungeness pot fishery’’ (proposed to be
separated from the ‘‘WA/OR/CA crab
pot fishery’’ in this proposed rule).
There have been no recent interactions
with this species.
NMFS proposes to remove humpback
whales (CA/OR/WA) and sea otters (CA)
from the list of species/stocks
incidentally killed/injured in the
Category III ‘‘CA spiny lobster,
coonstripe shrimp, finfish, rock crab,
tanner crab pot or trap fishery’’
(currently listed as the ‘‘CA lobster,
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 115 / Friday, June 13, 2008 / Proposed Rules
prawn, shrimp, rock crab, fish pot
fishery’’). As described above in the
discussion of West Coast trap/pot
fisheries, NMFS analysis of the available
information on humpback whale
entanglements in pot and trap gear
suggests that these gears are not likely
to cause interactions. NMFS proposes to
remove sea otter (CA) from the list of
species/stocks incidentally killed/
injured due to a lack of recent data to
indicate that sea otters are seriously
injured or killed in this fishery. The
only available information of a sea otter
taken in one of a these types of pots or
traps is from November 1987. Sea otters
(CA) will not be listed as incidentally
killed/injured in the proposed Category
II ‘‘CA spot prawn trap’’ fisheries
(proposed to be separated out from the
renamed ‘‘CA spiny lobster, coonstripe
shrimp, finfish, rock crab, tanner crab
pot or trap fishery’’ in this proposed
rule). The only available information of
a sea otter taken in each of these types
of pots or traps is from 1991. There have
been no reports of interactions since
1987 or 1991, respectively.
NMFS proposes to change the stock
name of humpback whales from
humpback whales (Eastern North
Pacific) to humpback whales (CA/OR/
WA) for all fisheries in Table 1 in which
this species is listed as incidentally
killed or injured to match the stock
name in the most current SARs. The
stock name was changed in the Final
2007 SARs.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Commercial Fisheries in the Atlantic
Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean
Addition of Fisheries to the LOF
NMFS proposes to add the ‘‘U.S.
Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico trotline
fishery’’ as a Category III fishery.
Trotline gear can be described as
longline which rests on the seafloor,
attached to anchored floats or buoys at
each end, to which a series of baited
hooks are attached at intervals of 2–6 ft
(0.6–1.8 m). The line is typically set
parallel to the shore in water 5–12 ft
(1.5–3.7 m) deep and the line can reach
up to a mile (1.6 km) in length. Trotlines
are typically worked from a boat where
rollers are used to haul the line from the
water. Target species include blue crab,
catfish, and other finfish throughout the
coastal Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico.
‘‘Hook and line’’ gear is defined at 50
CFR 600.10 as ‘‘one or more hooks
attached to one or more lines (can
include a troll).’’ Therefore, NMFS
proposes to classify the ‘‘U.S. Atlantic,
Gulf of Mexico trotline fishery’’ under
‘‘Longline/Hook-and-Line Fisheries’’ in
Table 2 of the LOF. The number of
participants in this fishery is unknown
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:17 Jun 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
and there are no known takes of any
marine mammal from trotline gear.
Fishery Name and Organizational
Changes and Clarifications
Northeast sink gillnet fishery
NMFS proposes to clarify and correct
the boundary definition of the Category
I ‘‘Northeast sink gillnet fishery.’’ The
current boundaries are defined as
‘‘excluding Long Island Sound or other
waters where gillnet fisheries are listed
as Category III. At this time, these
Category II and II fisheries include...’’
(72 FR 66056, November 27, 2007).
NMFS proposes to clarify this boundary
definition by replacing this with the
following language: ’’...excluding Long
Island Sound and other waters where
gillnet fisheries are listed as Category II
and III. At this time, these Category II
and III fisheries include...’’
Northeast anchored float gillnet fishery
NMFS proposes to clarify the
boundary definition of the Category II
‘‘Northeast anchored float gillnet
fishery.’’ The current fishery boundary
is defined as ’’...from the U.S.- Canada
border to Long Island, NY, at at 72° 30’
W. long south to 36° 33.03’ N. lat. and
east to the eastern edge of the EEZ...’’
(72 FR 66056, November 27, 2007).
NMFS proposes to clarify this boundary
definition by adding the following
language: ‘‘...from the U.S.-Canada
border to Long Island, NY, at 72° 30’ W.
long south to 36° 33.03’ N. lat.
(corresponding with the VA/NC border)
and east to the eastern edge of the
EEZ...’’
Northeast drift gillnet fishery
NMFS proposes to clarify the
boundary definition of the Category II
‘‘Northeast drift gillnet fishery.’’ The
current fishery boundary is defined as
occurring ’’...at any depth in the water
column from the U.S.-Canada border to
Long Island, NY, at 72° 30’ W. long.
south to 36° 33.03’ N. lat. and east to the
eastern edge of the EEZ...’’ (72 FR
66056, November 27, 2007). NMFS
proposes to clarify this boundary
definition by adding the following
language: ’’...at any depth in the water
column from the U.S.-Canada border to
Long Island, NY, at 72° 30’ W. long.
south to 36° 33.03’ N. lat.
(corresponding with the VA/NC border)
and east to the eastern edge of the
EEZ...’’
Mid-Atlantic mid-water trawl fishery
NMFS proposes to modify the fishery
description for the Category II ‘‘MidAtlantic mid-water trawl fishery.’’
NMFS received a comment on the 2008
LOF suggesting that the ‘‘Mid-Atlantic
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
33775
mid-water trawl fishery’’ was an
inaccurate characterization of the
fishery targeting Ilex squid, Loligo
squid, and Atlantic butterfish (72 FR
66064, November 27, 2007, comment/
response 28). After consulting with the
Northeast Fisheries Science Center,
observer reports, and vessel trip report
(VTR) data , NMFS concluded that the
gear targeting these species is better
characterized by the ‘‘Mid-Atlantic
bottom trawl fishery’’ (Category II)
rather than the ‘‘Mid-Atlantic mid-water
trawl fishery’’ (Category II) as it is
currently listed (72 FR 66048, November
27, 2007). Additionally, NMFS has also
become aware of additional species
targeted by the ‘‘Mid-Atlantic mid-water
trawl fishery’’ (2007 final SAR). To
reflect this new information, NMFS
proposes to replace the current ‘‘MidAtlantic mid-water trawl’’ fishery
description with the following
description:
‘‘The ’Mid-Atlantic mid-water trawl
fishery’ primarily targets Atlantic
mackerel, chub mackerel, and
miscellaneous other pelagic species.
This fishery consists of both single and
pair trawls, which are designed,
capable, or used to fish for pelagic
species with no portion of the gear
designed to be operated in contact with
the bottom. The fishery for Atlantic
mackerel occurs primarily from
southern New England through the midAtlantic from January to March and in
the Gulf of Maine during the summer
and fall (May to December). This fishery
is managed under the Federal Atlantic
Mackerel, Squid, and Butterfish FMP
using an annual quota system.’’
Mid-Atlantic bottom trawl fishery
NMFS proposes to modify the fishery
description for the Category II ‘‘MidAtlantic bottom trawl fishery.’’ NMFS
received a comment on the 2008 LOF
regarding gear used for targeting Ilex
squid, Loligo squid, and Atlantic
butterfish (72 FR 66048, November 27,
2007, comment/response 28). After
consulting with the Northeast Fisheries
Science Center, observer reports, and
VTR data , NMFS concluded that the
gear targeting these species is better
characterized by the ‘‘Mid-Atlantic
bottom trawl fishery’’ (Category II)
rather than the ‘‘Mid-Atlantic mid-water
trawl fishery’’ (Category II) as it is
currently listed (72 FR 66057, November
27, 2007). Additionally, NMFS has also
become aware of additional species
targeted by the ‘‘Mid-Atlantic bottom
trawl fishery’’ (2007 final SAR). To
reflect this new information, NMFS
proposes to replace the current ‘‘MidAtlantic bottom trawl’’ fishery
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
33776
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 115 / Friday, June 13, 2008 / Proposed Rules
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
description with the following
description:
‘‘The Category II ‘Mid-Atlantic bottom
trawl fishery’ uses bottom trawl gear to
target species including but not limited
to: bluefish, croaker, monkfish, summer
flounder (fluke), winter flounder, silver
hake (whiting), spiny dogfish, smooth
dogfish, scup, black sea bass, Atlantic
cod, haddock, pollock, yellowtail
flounder, witch flounder, windowpane
flounder, summer flounder, American
plaice, Atlantic halibut, redfish, red
hake, white hake, ocean pout, skate spp,
Atlantic mackerel, Loligo squid, Ilex
squid, and Atlantic butterfish. These
fisheries occur year round from Cape
Cod, MA, to Cape Hatteras, NC, in
waters west of 72° 30’ W. long. and
north of a line extending due east from
the NC/SC border. While the gear
characteristics for the mixed groundfish
bottom trawl gear have not yet been
determined, the Ilex and Loligo squid
fisheries are dominated by small-mesh
otter trawls. The Loligo fishery occurs
mostly offshore near the edge of the
continental shelf during fall and winter
months (October to March) and inshore
during spring and summer (AprilSeptember) though landings of Loligo
are also taken by inshore pound nets
and fish traps in the spring and summer.
The fishery for Ilex occurs offshore,
mainly in continental shelf and slope
waters during summer months (JuneSeptember). The Ilex and Loligo
fisheries are managed by moratorium
permits, gear and area restrictions,
quotas, and trip limits. Atlantic
butterfish are mainly caught as bycatch
in the directed squid and mackerel
fisheries and observer data has
suggested that there is a significant
amount of butterfish discarding that
occurs at sea.’’
Mid-Atlantic haul/beach seine fishery
NMFS proposes to update the fishery
description for the Category II ‘MidAtlantic haul/beach seine fishery.’ In
the Final 2008 LOF (72 FR 66048,
November 27, 2007), NMFS stated that
it would consider revising the
description of the fishery following
rulemaking by the North Carolina
Division of Marine Fisheries (NCDMF)
involving the NC Atlantic Ocean striped
bass beach seine fishery. In an effort to
distinguish between beach-anchored
gillnets and true beach seines, NCDMF
recently finalized regulations, effective
for the fall 2008 fishery, defining a
beach seine for the Atlantic Ocean
striped bass beach seine fishery. Fishers
participating in the fishery will be
required to use multifilament or multifiber webbing swipe nets fished from
the ocean beach that are deployed from
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:17 Jun 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
a vessel launched from the ocean beach
where the fishing operation takes place.
Therefore, NMFS proposes to add the
following information to the description
from the Final 2008 LOF:
‘‘The NC component of this fishery
operates primarily along the Outer
Banks using small and large mesh nets.
Small mesh nets are generally used in
the spring and fall to target gray trout
(weakfish), speckled trout, spot, kingfish
(sea mullet), bluefish, and harvest fish
(star butters). Large mesh nets are used
to target Atlantic striped bass during the
winter and are regulated via NC Marine
Fisheries Commission rules and
NCDMF proclamations. Construction
and characteristics of the large and
small mesh nets differ, but they
generally both gill fish, rather than haul
fish to shore in the manner of a
traditional beach seine. Small mesh nets
are generally constructed with a
combination of multifilament and
monofilament webbing or all
monofilament webbing material. If a
combination of materials is used, the
construction design often consists of
monofilament for the inshore (wash)
and offshore (wing) portions of the net,
while the middle (bunt) is constructed
of twisted nylong. Conversely, large
mesh nets are constructed of all
monofilament material. Despite the
difference in construction, they are set
and hauled similarly. Nets are deployed
out of the stern of surf dories and set
perpendicular to the shoreline. A truck
is generally used to haul the net ashore
by attaching one end of the net to the
truck and pulling it ashore while the
other end remains fixed until the end of
the haul.
NC fishers previously referred to this
type of gear as a beach seine because of
the way the gear was set and hauled.
Because of the manner in which both
large and small mesh nets are
constructed (i.e., inclusion of
monofilament material) and fished, they
operate as gillnets rather than beach
seines, and NMFS considers them a
component of the Category I, ‘MidAtlantic gillnet fishery.’ Once NCDMF’s
regulation is effective, the Atlantic
Ocean striped bass beach seine fishery
will be the only fishery included under
the ’Mid-Atlantic haul/beach seine
fishery’ for NC. Therefore, small and
large mesh nets constructed of
monofilament and multifilament
material will be considered part of the
Category I ‘‘Mid-Atlantic gillnet
fishery.’’
In addition to the NC component as
described above, the ‘Mid-Atlantic haul/
beach seine fishery’ also includes haul
seining in other areas of the midAtlantic, including VA, MD, and NJ.
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Because the net materials and fishing
practices of the Atlantic Ocean striped
bass beach seine fishery in NC are
different from haul seining in other
areas, NMFS may consider splitting this
fishery in the future.’’
List of Species That are Incidentally
Seriously Injured or Killed
NMFS proposes to add white-side
dolphin (Western North Atlantic [WNA]
stock) to the list of marine mammal
species and stocks incidentally injured
or killed in the Category II ‘‘MidAtlantic bottom trawl fishery.’’
Information presented in the 2007 Final
SAR states that one Atlantic white-sided
dolphin incidental take was observed in
1997 and another in 2005.
NMFS proposes to add harbor seal
(WNA stock) to the list of marine
mammal species and stocks incidentally
injured or killed in the Category II
‘‘Northeast bottom trawl fishery.’’
Recent information presented in the
2007 final SAR states that two harbor
seal mortalities were observed between
2001 and 2005.
NMFS proposes to add bottlenose
dolphins (WNA coastal stock) to the list
of marine mammal species and stocks
incidentally injured or killed in the
Category III ‘‘FL spiny lobster trap/pot
fishery.’’ The 2008 LOF includes the
bottlenose dolphins (Eastern GMX
coastal stock) as incidentally killed or
injured in the fishery, but stranding data
indicate that, though rare, interactions
are also occurring in the Atlantic. Two
bottlenose dolphins are known to have
stranded with spiny lobster trap/pot
gear in Miami Beach, FL: one on
October 4, 1997, and one on August 17,
2007. These animals fall within the
WNA coastal bottlenose dolphin stock’s
Central Florida Management Unit,
which currently has an unknown PBR
(2007 final SAR). Therefore, NMFS
cannot determine whether this fishery
requires reclassification until more
information is available. There is no
observer program for this fishery.
NMFS proposes to add bottlenose
dolphins (WNA coastal stock) to the list
of marine mammal species and stocks
incidentally injured or killed in the
Category III ‘‘Southeastern U.S. Atlantic,
Gulf of Mexico stone crab trap/pot
fishery.’’ The 2008 LOF states that there
are no documented marine mammal
interactions with this fishery. However,
stranding data indicate that bottlenose
dolphins interact with this fishery. Two
bottlenose dolphins stranded with stone
crab trap/pot gear: one in Biscayne Bay,
FL, on May 5, 2003, and one in Miami
Beach, FL, on November 21, 2006.
These animals fall within the WNA
coastal bottlenose dolphin stock’s
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 115 / Friday, June 13, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Central Florida Management Unit,
which currently has an unknown PBR
(2007 final SAR). Therefore, NMFS
cannot determine whether this fishery
requires reclassification until more
information is available. There is no
observer program for this fishery.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
List of Fisheries
The following tables set forth the
proposed list of U.S. commercial
fisheries according to their classification
under section 118 of the MMPA. In
Tables 1 and 2, the estimated number of
vessels/participants in fisheries
operating within U.S. waters is
expressed in terms of the number of
active participants in the fishery, when
possible. If this information is not
available, the estimated number of
vessels or persons licensed for a
particular fishery is provided. If no
recent information is available on the
number of participants in a fishery, the
number from the most recent LOF is
used. For high seas fisheries, Table 3
lists the number of currently valid
HSFCA permits held by fishers.
Although this likely overestimates the
number of active participants in many
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:17 Jun 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
of these fisheries, the number of valid
HSFCA permits is the most reliable data
at this time.
Tables 1, 2, and 3 also list the marine
mammal species and stocks incidentally
killed or injured in each fishery based
on observer data, logbook data,
stranding reports, and fisher reports.
This list includes all species or stocks
known to be injured or killed in a given
fishery, but also includes species or
stocks for which there are anecdotal
records of an injury or mortality.
Additionally, species identified by
logbook entries may not be verified.
NMFS has designated those stocks
driving a fishery’s classification (i.e., the
fishery is classified based on serious
injuries and mortalities of a marine
mammal stock greater than 50 percent
[Category I], or greater than 1 percent
and less than 50 percent [Category II], of
a stock’s PBR) by a ‘‘1≥after the stock’s
name.
In Tables 1 and 2, there are several
fisheries classified in Category II that
have no recent documented injuries or
mortalities of marine mammals, or that
did not result in a serious injury or
mortality rate greater than 1 percent of
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
33777
a stock’s PBR level. NMFS has classified
these fisheries by analogy to other gear
types that are known to cause mortality
or serious injury of marine mammals, as
discussed in the final LOF for 1996 (60
FR 67063, December 28, 1995), and
according to factors listed in the
definition of a ‘‘Category II fishery’’ in
50 CFR 229.2. NMFS has designated
those fisheries originally listed by
analogy in Tables 1 and 2 by a ‘‘2’’ after
the fishery’s name.
There are several fisheries in Tables 1,
2, and 3 in which a portion of the
fishing vessels cross the EEZ boundary,
and therefore operate within U.S. waters
and on the high seas. NMFS has
designated those fisheries in each Table
by a ‘‘*’’ after the fishery’s name.
Table 1 lists commercial fisheries in
the Pacific Ocean (including Alaska);
Table 2 lists commercial fisheries in the
Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and
Caribbean; Table 3 lists commercial
fisheries on the High Seas; Table 4 lists
fisheries affected by Take Reduction
Teams or Plans.
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 115 / Friday, June 13, 2008 / Proposed Rules
16:17 Jun 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
EP13jn08.000
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
33778
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:17 Jun 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
33779
EP13jn08.001
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 115 / Friday, June 13, 2008 / Proposed Rules
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 115 / Friday, June 13, 2008 / Proposed Rules
16:17 Jun 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
EP13jn08.002
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
33780
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:17 Jun 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
33781
EP13jn08.003
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 115 / Friday, June 13, 2008 / Proposed Rules
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 115 / Friday, June 13, 2008 / Proposed Rules
16:17 Jun 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
EP13jn08.004
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
33782
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:17 Jun 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
33783
EP13jn08.005
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 115 / Friday, June 13, 2008 / Proposed Rules
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 115 / Friday, June 13, 2008 / Proposed Rules
16:17 Jun 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
EP13jn08.006
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
33784
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:17 Jun 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
33785
EP13jn08.007
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 115 / Friday, June 13, 2008 / Proposed Rules
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 115 / Friday, June 13, 2008 / Proposed Rules
16:17 Jun 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
EP13jn08.008
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
33786
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:17 Jun 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
33787
EP13jn08.009
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 115 / Friday, June 13, 2008 / Proposed Rules
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 115 / Friday, June 13, 2008 / Proposed Rules
16:17 Jun 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
EP13jn08.010
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
33788
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:17 Jun 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
33789
EP13jn08.011
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 115 / Friday, June 13, 2008 / Proposed Rules
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 115 / Friday, June 13, 2008 / Proposed Rules
16:17 Jun 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
EP13jn08.012
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
33790
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:17 Jun 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
33791
EP13jn08.013
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 115 / Friday, June 13, 2008 / Proposed Rules
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 115 / Friday, June 13, 2008 / Proposed Rules
16:17 Jun 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
EP13jn08.014
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
33792
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:17 Jun 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
33793
EP13jn08.015
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 115 / Friday, June 13, 2008 / Proposed Rules
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 115 / Friday, June 13, 2008 / Proposed Rules
16:17 Jun 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
EP13jn08.016
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
33794
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:17 Jun 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
33795
EP13jn08.017
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 115 / Friday, June 13, 2008 / Proposed Rules
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 115 / Friday, June 13, 2008 / Proposed Rules
16:17 Jun 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
EP13jn08.018
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
33796
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:17 Jun 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
33797
EP13jn08.019
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 115 / Friday, June 13, 2008 / Proposed Rules
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 115 / Friday, June 13, 2008 / Proposed Rules
16:17 Jun 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
EP13jn08.020
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
33798
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 115 / Friday, June 13, 2008 / Proposed Rules
33799
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:17 Jun 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
EP13jn08.021
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
BILLING CODE 3510–22–C
33800
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 115 / Friday, June 13, 2008 / Proposed Rules
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Classification
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of
the Department of Commerce certified
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration that this
proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The factual basis leading to the
certification is set forth below.
Under existing regulations, all fishers
participating in Category I or II fisheries
must register under the MMPA and
obtain an Authorization Certificate. The
Authorization Certificate authorizes the
taking of marine mammals incidental to
commercial fishing operations.
Additionally, fishers may be subject to
a Take Reduction Plan (TRP) and
requested to carry an observer. NMFS
has estimated that approximately 44,200
fishing vessels, most of which are small
entities, operate in Category I or II
fisheries, and therefore, are required to
register with NMFS. Each region has
integrated the MMPA registration
process with existing state and Federal
registration programs. Fishers who have
a Federal or state fishery permit or
landing license, or who are authorized
through another related Federal or state
fishery registration program, are
currently not required to register
separately under the MMPA or pay the
$25 registration fee under the MMPA.
Therefore, there are no direct costs to
small entities under this proposed rule.
If a vessel is requested to carry an
observer, fishers will not incur any
direct economic costs associated with
carrying that observer. Potential indirect
costs to individual fishers required to
take observers may include: lost space
on deck for catch, lost bunk space, and
lost fishing time due to time needed to
process bycatch data. For effective
monitoring, however, observers will
rotate among a limited number of
vessels in a fishery at any given time
and each vessel within an observed
fishery has an equal probability of being
requested to accommodate an observer.
Therefore, the potential indirect costs to
individual fishers are expected to be
minimal because observer coverage
would only be required for a small
percentage of an individual’s total
annual fishing time. In addition, section
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:17 Jun 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
118 of the MMPA states that an observer
will not be placed on a vessel if the
facilities for quartering an observer or
performing observer functions are
inadequate or unsafe, thereby exempting
vessels too small to accommodate an
observer from this requirement. As a
result of this certification, an initial
regulatory flexibility analysis is not
required and was not prepared. In the
event that reclassification of a fishery to
Category I or II results in a TRP,
economic analyses of the effects of that
plan will be summarized in subsequent
rulemaking actions.
This proposed rule contains
collection-of-information requirements
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act.
The collection of information for the
registration of fishers under the MMPA
has been approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
OMB control number 0648–0293 (0.15
hours per report for new registrants and
0.09 hours per report for renewals). The
requirement for reporting marine
mammal injuries or mortalities has been
approved by OMB under OMB control
number 0648–0292 (0.15 hours per
report). These estimates include the
time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources,
gathering and maintaining the data
needed, and completing and reviewing
the collection of information. Send
comments regarding these reporting
burden estimates or any other aspect of
the collections of information, including
suggestions for reducing burden, to
NMFS and OMB (see ADDRESSES and
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
Notwithstanding any other provision
of law, no person is required to respond
to nor shall a person be subject to a
penalty for failure to comply with a
collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act unless that collection of
information displays a currently valid
OMB control number.
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for the
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
An environmental assessment (EA)
was prepared under the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for
regulations to implement section 118 of
the MMPA in June 1995. NMFS revised
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
that EA relative to classifying U.S.
commercial fisheries on the LOF in
December 2005. Both the 1995 EA and
the 2005 EA concluded that
implementation of MMPA section 118
regulations would not have a significant
impact on the human environment. This
proposed rule would not make any
significant change in the management of
reclassified fisheries, and therefore, this
proposed rule is not expected to change
the analysis or conclusion of the 2005
EA. If NMFS takes a management
action, for example, through the
development of a TRP, NMFS will first
prepare an environmental document, as
required under NEPA, specific to that
action.
This proposed rule will not affect
species listed as threatened or
endangered under the Endangered
Species Act (ESA) or their associated
critical habitat. The impacts of
numerous fisheries have been analyzed
in various biological opinions, and this
proposed rule will not affect the
conclusions of those opinions. The
classification of fisheries on the LOF is
not considered to be a management
action that would adversely affect
threatened or endangered species. If
NMFS takes a management action, for
example, through the development of a
TRP, NMFS would conduct consultation
under ESA section 7 for that action.
This proposed rule will have no
adverse impacts on marine mammals
and may have a positive impact on
marine mammals by improving
knowledge of marine mammals and the
fisheries interacting with marine
mammals through information collected
from observer programs, stranding and
sighting data, or take reduction teams.
This proposed rule will not affect the
land or water uses or natural resources
of the coastal zone, as specified under
section 307 of the Coastal Zone
Management Act.
Dated: June 9, 2008.
John Oliver,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Operations, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
[FR Doc. 08–1352 Filed 6–10–08; 3:04pm]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 115 (Friday, June 13, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 33760-33800]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-1352]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 229
[Docket No. 080204115-8135-01]
RIN 0648-AW48
List of Fisheries for 2009
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Department of Commerce.
[[Page 33761]]
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) publishes its
proposed List of Fisheries (LOF) for 2009, as required by the Marine
Mammal Protection Act (MMPA). The proposed LOF for 2009 reflects new
information on interactions between commercial fisheries and marine
mammals. NMFS must categorize each commercial fishery on the LOF into
one of three categories under the MMPA based upon the level of serious
injury and mortality of marine mammals that occurs incidental to each
fishery. The categorization of a fishery in the LOF determines whether
participants in that fishery are subject to certain provisions of the
MMPA, such as registration, observer coverage, and take reduction plan
requirements.
DATES: Comments must be received by August 12, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Send comments by anyone of the following methods.
(1) Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic comments through
the Federal eRulemaking portal: https://www.regulations.gov (follow
instructions for submitting comments).
(2) Mail: Chief, Marine Mammal and Sea Turtle Conservation
Division, Attn: List of Fisheries, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS,
1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910.
Comments regarding the burden-hour estimates, or any other aspect
of the collection of information requirements contained in this
proposed rule, should be submitted in writing to Chief, Marine Mammal
and Sea Turtle Conservation Division, Office of Protected Resources,
NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910, or to David
Rostker, OMB, by fax to 202-395-7285 or by email to David_
Rostker@omb.eop.gov.
Instructions: All comments received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted to https://www.regulations.gov without
change. All personal identifying information (for example, name,
address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by the commenter may be publicly
accessible. Do not submit confidential business information or
otherwise sensitive or protected information. NMFS will accept
anonymous comments. Attachments to electronic comments will be accepted
in Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF file formats only.
See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for a listing of all Regional
Offices.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melissa Andersen, Office of Protected
Resources, 301-713-2322; David Gouveia, Northeast Region, 978-281-9328;
Nancy Young, Southeast Region, 727-824-5312; Elizabeth Petras,
Southwest Region, 562-980-3238; Brent Norberg, Northwest Region, 206-
526-6733; Bridget Mansfield, Alaska Region, 907-586-7642; Lisa Van
Atta, Pacific Islands Region, 808-944-2257. Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the hearing impaired may call the Federal
Information Relay Service at 1-800-877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.
Eastern time, Monday through Friday, excluding Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Availability of Published Materials
Information regarding the LOF and the Marine Mammal Authorization
Program, including registration procedures and forms, current and past
LOFs, observer requirements, and marine mammal injury/mortality
reporting forms and submittal procedures, may be obtained at: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/interactions/lof/, or from any NMFS Regional
Office at the addresses listed below.
Regional Offices
NMFS, Northeast Region, One Blackburn Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930-
2298, Attn: Marcia Hobbs;
NMFS, Southeast Region, 263 13th Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL
33701, Attn: Teletha Mincey;
NMFS, Southwest Region, 501 W. Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long Beach,
CA 90802-4213, Attn: Lyle Enriquez;
NMFS, Northwest Region, 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA 98115,
Attn: Permits Office;
NMFS, Alaska Region, Protected Resources, P.O. Box 22668, 709 West
9th Street, Juneau, AK 99802, Attn: Bridget Mansfield; or
NMFS, Pacific Islands Region, Protected Resources, 1601 Kapiolani
Boulevard, Suite 1100, Honolulu, HI 96814-4700, Attn: Lisa Van Atta.
What is the List of Fisheries?
Section 118 of the MMPA requires NMFS to place all U.S. commercial
fisheries into one of three categories based on the level of incidental
serious injury and mortality of marine mammals occurring in each
fishery (16 U.S.C. 1387(c)(1)). The categorization of a fishery in the
LOF determines whether participants in that fishery may be required to
comply with certain provisions of the MMPA, such as registration,
observer coverage, and take reduction plan requirements. NMFS must
reexamine the LOF annually, considering new information in the Marine
Mammal Stock Assessment Reports (SAR) and other relevant sources, and
publish in the Federal Register any necessary changes to the LOF after
notice and opportunity for public comment (16 U.S.C. 1387 (c)(1)(C)).
How Does NMFS Determine in which Category a Fishery is Placed?
The definitions for the fishery classification criteria can be
found in the implementing regulations for section 118 of the MMPA (50
CFR 229.2). The criteria are also summarized here.
Fishery Classification Criteria
The fishery classification criteria consist of a two-tiered, stock-
specific approach that first addresses the total impact of all
fisheries on each marine mammal stock, and then addresses the impact of
individual fisheries on each stock. This approach is based on
consideration of the rate, in numbers of animals per year, of
incidental mortalities and serious injuries of marine mammals due to
commercial fishing operations relative to the potential biological
removal (PBR) level for each marine mammal stock. The MMPA (16 U.S.C.
1362 (20)) defines the PBR level as the maximum number of animals, not
including natural mortalities, that may be removed from a marine mammal
stock while allowing that stock to reach or maintain its optimum
sustainable population. This definition can also be found in the
implementing regulations for section 118 of the MMPA (50 CFR 229.2).
Tier 1: If the total annual mortality and serious injury of a
marine mammal stock, across all fisheries, is less than or equal to 10
percent of the PBR level of the stock, all fisheries interacting with
the stock would be placed in Category III (unless those fisheries
interact with other stock(s) in which total annual mortality and
serious injury is greater than 10 percent of PBR). Otherwise, these
fisheries are subject to the next tier (Tier 2) of analysis to
determine their classification.
Tier 2, Category I: Annual mortality and serious injury of a stock
in a given fishery is greater than or equal to 50 percent of the PBR
level.
Tier 2, Category II: Annual mortality and serious injury of a stock
in a given fishery is greater than 1 percent and less than 50 percent
of the PBR level.
Tier 2, Category III: Annual mortality and serious injury of a
stock in a given fishery is less than or equal to 1 percent of the PBR
level.
While Tier 1 considers the cumulative fishery mortality and serious
injury for a particular stock, Tier 2 considers
[[Page 33762]]
fishery-specific mortality and serious injury for a particular stock.
Additional details regarding how the categories were determined are
provided in the preamble to the proposed rule implementing section 118
of the MMPA (60 FR 45086, August 30, 1995).
Because fisheries are categorized on a per-stock basis, a fishery
may qualify as one Category for one marine mammal stock and another
Category for a different marine mammal stock. A fishery is typically
categorized on the LOF at its highest level of classification (e.g., a
fishery qualifying for Category III for one marine mammal stock and for
Category II for another marine mammal stock will be listed under
Category II).
Other Criteria That May Be Considered
In the absence of reliable information indicating the frequency of
incidental mortality and serious injury of marine mammals by a
commercial fishery, NMFS will determine whether the fishery qualifies
for Category II by evaluating other factors such as fishing techniques,
gear used, methods used to deter marine mammals, target species,
seasons and areas fished, qualitative data from logbooks or fisher
reports, stranding data, and the species and distribution of marine
mammals in the area, or at the discretion of the Assistant
Administrator for Fisheries (50 CFR 229.2).
How Does NMFS Determine which Species or Stocks are Included as
Incidentally Killed or Seriously Injured in a Fishery?
The LOF includes a list of marine mammal species or stocks
incidentally killed or seriously injured in each commercial fishery,
based on the level of mortality or serious injury in each fishery
relative to the PBR level for each stock. To determine which species or
stocks are included as incidentally killed or seriously injured in a
fishery, NMFS annually reviews the information presented in the current
SARs. The SARs are based upon the best available scientific information
and provide the most current and inclusive information on each stock's
PBR level and level of mortality or serious injury incidental to
commercial fishing operations. NMFS also reviews other sources of new
information, including observer data, stranding data, and fisher self-
reports.
In the absence of reliable information on the level of mortality or
serious injury of a marine mammal stock, or insufficient observer data,
NMFS will determine whether a species or stock should be added to, or
deleted from, the list by considering other factors such as: Changes in
gear used, increases or decreases in fishing effort, increases or
decreases in the level of observer coverage, and/or changes in fishery
management that are expected to lead to decreases in interactions with
a given marine mammal stock (such as a fishery management plan or a
take reduction plan). NMFS will provide case-specific justification in
the LOF for changes to the list of species or stocks incidentally
killed or seriously injured.
How Does NMFS Determine the Level of Observer Coverage in a Fishery?
Data obtained from observers and the level of observer coverage are
important tools in estimating the level of marine mammal mortality and
serious injury in commercial fishing operations. The best available
information on the level of observer coverage, and the spatial and
temporal distribution of observed marine mammal interactions, is
presented in the SARs. Starting with the 2005 SARs, each SAR includes
an appendix with detailed descriptions of each Category I and II
fishery in the LOF, including observer coverage. The SARs generally do
not provide detailed information on observer coverage in Category III
fisheries because, under the MMPA, Category III fisheries are not
required to accommodate observers aboard vessels due to the remote
likelihood of mortality and serious injury of marine mammals.
Information presented in the SARs' appendices includes: level of
observer coverage, target species, levels of fishing effort, spatial
and temporal distribution of fishing effort, characteristics of fishing
gear and operations, management and regulations, and interactions with
marine mammals. Copies of the SARs are available on the NMFS Office of
Protected Resource's website at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/sars/.
Additional information on observer programs in commercial fisheries can
be found on the NMFS National Observer Program's website: https://
www.st.nmfs.gov/st4/nop/.
How Do I Find Out if a Specific Fishery is in Category I, II, or III?
This proposed rule includes three tables that list all U.S.
commercial fisheries by LOF Category. Table 1 lists all of the
fisheries in the Pacific Ocean (including Alaska); Table 2 lists all of
the fisheries in the Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean;
Table 3 lists all U.S.-authorized fisheries on the high seas. A fourth
table, Table 4, lists all fisheries managed under applicable take
reduction plans or teams.
Are High Seas Fisheries Included on the LOF?
NMFS received public comments for the 2007 LOF (72 FR 14466, March
28, 2007, comment/response 9) and the 2008 LOF (72 FR 66048, November
27, 2007, comment/response 5) requesting NMFS include high seas
fisheries on the LOF. In response to these comments, NMFS analyzed the
relationship between MMPA sections 117 and 118 and the High Seas
Fishing Compliance Act (HSFCA) and determined that it is appropriate to
include U.S. fishers fishing on the high seas on the LOF. Beginning
with the 2009 LOF, NMFS proposes to include high seas fisheries in
Table 3 of the LOF. NMFS compiled information on vessels issued a HSFCA
permit to identify fisheries operating on the high seas and to ensure
that all high seas fisheries are included in the LOF, particularly
those that do not have a component within waters under the jurisdiction
of the United States (e.g., State waters, the U.S. territorial sea, and
the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ); hereafter referred to as ``U.S.
waters'').
NMFS acknowledges that many fisheries currently operate in both
U.S. waters and on the high seas, creating some overlap between the
fisheries listed in Tables 1 and 2 and those in Table 3. NMFS has
designated those fisheries in Tables 1, 2, and 3 by a ``*'' after the
fishery's name. The number of HSFCA permits listed in Table 3 for the
high seas components of these U.S. waters fisheries do not necessarily
represent additional fishers that are not accounted for in Tables 1 and
2. Many fishers holding these permits also fish within U.S. waters and
are included in the number of vessels and participants operating within
those fisheries in Table 1 and 2. For example, the fishers
participating in the Category I ``CA/OR thresher shark/swordfish drift
gillnet fishery'' may operate in both U.S. waters and the adjacent high
seas, thus the high seas component of this fishery (listed in Table 3
as the ``Pacific Highly Migratory Species'' drift gillnet) is not a
separate fishery, but an extension of the fishery operating within U.S.
waters (listed in Table 1).
How Does NMFS Authorize U.S. Vessels to Participate in High Seas
Fisheries?
NMFS issues high seas fishing permits, valid for five years, under
the HSFCA. To fish under a high seas permit, a fisherman must also
possess any required permits issued under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act (MSA) (with the exception of the South
[[Page 33763]]
Pacific Tuna Treaty fisheries, the Pacific Tuna Fisheries (Eastern
Tropical Pacific purse seine vessels) and the South Pacific Albacore
Troll fishery), and any permits issued by NMFS to fish within the
convention area of a Regional Fishery Management Organization. Under
the current permitting system, however, a fisherman can obtain a high
seas permit prior to obtaining any necessary MSA permits. Similarly, a
fisherman may have a HSFCA permit that was issued prior to changes in
permits issued under the MSA. Therefore, some fishers possess valid
HSFCA permits without the ability to fish under the permit. For this
reason, the number of HSFCA permits displayed in Table 3 of this
proposed rule is likely higher than the actual fishing effort by U.S.
vessels on the high seas.
As of 2004, NMFS issues HSFCA permits only for high seas fisheries
analyzed in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) and the Endangered Species Act (ESA). There are currently seven
U.S.-authorized high seas fisheries: Atlantic Highly Migratory Species
Fisheries, Pacific Highly Migratory Species Fisheries, Western Pacific
Pelagic Fisheries, South Pacific Albacore Troll Fishing, Pacific Tuna
Fisheries, South Pacific Tuna Fisheries, and Antarctic Marine Living
Resources. The LOF will not include the ``Pacific (Eastern Tropical)
Tuna Fisheries'' because these fisheries are managed under Title III of
the MMPA, separate from those fisheries subject to the LOF under
section 118. Permits obtained prior to 2004 for fisheries that are no
longer authorized by the HSFCA, but for which the 5-year permit is
still valid, are included on the LOF as ``unspecified.'' The
``unspecified'' fisheries will be removed from the LOF once those
permits have expired, and the permit holder is required to renew the
permit under one of the seven authorized fisheries.
The authorized high seas fisheries are broad in scope and encompass
multiple specific fisheries identified by gear type. Therefore, the
seven U.S.-authorized high seas fisheries, exclusive of the ``Pacific
(Eastern Tropical) Tuna Fisheries'', are subdivided on the LOF based on
gear types (e.g., trawls, longlines, purse seines, gillnets, etc.), as
listed on each individual's permit application, to provide more detail
on composition of effort within these fisheries.
How Will NMFS Categorize High Seas Fisheries on the LOF?
As discussed in the previous sections of this preamble, commercial
fisheries operating within U.S. waters are categorized on the LOF based
on the level of mortality and serious injury of marine mammal stocks
incidental to commercial fishing as related to the stock's PBR level.
PBR levels are calculated based on the stock's abundance using data
presented in the SARs. Section 117 of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1386)
requires NMFS to prepare SARs for marine mammal stocks occurring ``in
waters under the jurisdiction of the United States.'' NMFS does not
develop SARs or calculate PBR levels for marine mammal stocks on the
high seas; therefore, NMFS does not possess the same information to
categorize high seas fisheries as is used to categorize fisheries
operating within U.S. waters.
NMFS proposes to categorize the majority of high seas fisheries on
the LOF as Category II. Category II is the appropriate category for new
fisheries for which NMFS does not have adequate information to
accurately categorize, unless there is reliable information to
categorize it otherwise, or until further information becomes
available. Categorizing a fishery as a Category II allows NMFS to place
observers on vessels in that fishery, providing NMFS the opportunity to
obtain information needed to most accurately catagorize a commercial
fishery. For fisheries that operate both within U.S. waters and on the
high seas, the fishery will be classified according to its status in
U.S. waters. Therefore, for a Category I or Category III fishery within
U.S. waters, the high seas component would also be classified as
Category I or Category III, accordingly. For example, the ``Atlantic
Ocean, Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico large pelagics longline fishery'' is a
Category I fishery targeting highly migratory species within U.S.
waters. Vessels in this fishery regularly cross into the high seas
while fishing. Therefore, the high seas ``Atlantic Highly Migratory
Species'' longline fishery would also be classified as Category I
because it is the same fishery regardless of whether a vessel is
fishing within U.S. waters or crosses the boundary into the high seas.
Please see below under ``Summary of changes to the LOF for 2009'' for
more details. NMFS will continue to gather available information on the
authorized high seas fisheries and recategorize fisheries in Table 3,
if necessary, as more information becomes available.
How Will NMFS Determine which Species or Stocks to Include as
Incidentally Killed or Seriously Injured in a High Seas Fishery?
All serious injury and mortality of marine mammals incidental to
commercial fishing operations, both in U.S. waters and on the high
seas, must be reported to NMFS. High seas fishers are provided with
Marine Mammal Take Reporting Forms to record such incidents. (Very few
marine mammal takes by U.S. vessels participating in high seas
fisheries, however, have been reported on these forms to date.)
Observer programs for fisheries operating within U.S. waters also
collect data on the high seas if the vessel should cross into high seas
waters. Additionally, some fisheries that operate exclusively on the
high seas have formal observer programs that provide data on
interactions. In these cases, the MSA, NEPA, or ESA documents
supporting the authorization of the seven U.S.-authorized high seas
fisheries review observer documented interactions and list the marine
mammal species taken in those fisheries. This information is used to
identify marine mammals killed/injured in these fisheries in Table 3 on
the LOF. For other fisheries without observer data, the MSA, NEPA, and
ESA documents supporting the authorization of the seven U.S.-authorized
high seas fisheries present information on marine mammal interactions
from anecdotal and other reports, which do not always specify the
marine mammal species involved in the interactions. Therefore, marine
mammal species killed or injured in the high seas fisheries without
observer data that are listed in Table 3 would be designated as
``undetermined'' until additional information on marine mammal
populations and fishery interactions on the high seas become available.
For high seas fisheries with an associated fishery operating within
U.S. waters, as discussed above, Table 3 would list the same marine
mammal species killed or injured (excluding coastal species that would
not be found on the high seas) as those killed or injured by that
fishery operating within U.S. waters. For example, the ``CA/OR thresher
shark/swordfish drift gillnet ([gteqt]14 in, mesh)'' lists Risso's
dolphins as killed or injured in the fishery operating within U.S.
waters. This species occurs both within U.S. waters and the adjacent
high seas and vessels in this fishery often cross into the high seas to
fish. NMFS assumes that these vessels pose the same risk to the species
on both sides of the EEZ boundary. Therefore, NMFS will also list
Risso's dolphins under the high seas component of this fishery, the
``Pacific Highly Migratory Species'' drift gillnet fishery. NMFS will
add and delete
[[Page 33764]]
species from the LOF as additional information becomes available.
Am I Required to Register Under the MMPA?
Owners of vessels or gear engaging in a Category I or II fishery
are required under the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1387(c)(2)), as described in 50
CFR 229.4, to register with NMFS and obtain a marine mammal
authorization to lawfully take a marine mammal incidental to commercial
fishing. Owners of vessels or gear engaged in a Category III fishery
are not required to register with NMFS or obtain a marine mammal
authorization.
How Do I Register?
NMFS has integrated the MMPA registration process, the Marine
Mammal Authorization Program (MMAP), with existing state and Federal
fishery license, registration, or permit systems for all Category I and
II fisheries on the LOF. Participants in these fisheries are
automatically registered under the MMAP and NMFS will issue vessel or
gear owners an authorization certificate. Participants in these
fisheries are not required to submit registration or renewal materials
directly under the MMAP. The authorization certificate, or a copy, must
be on board the vessel while it is operating in a Category I or II
fishery, or for non-vessel fisheries, in the possession of the person
in charge of the fishing operation (50 CFR 229.4(e)). Although efforts
are made to limit the issuance of authorization certificates to only
those vessel or gear owners that participate in Category I or II
fisheries, not all state and Federal permit systems distinguish between
fisheries as classified by the LOF. Therefore, some vessel or gear
owners in Category III fisheries may receive authorization certificates
even though they are not required for Category III fisheries.
Individuals fishing in Category I and II fisheries for which no state
or Federal permit is required must register with NMFS by contacting
their appropriate Regional Office (see ADDRESSES).
How Do I Receive My Authorization Certificate and Injury/Mortality
Reporting Forms?
All vessel or gear owners will receive their authorization
certificates and/or injury/mortality reporting forms via U.S. mail,
except those vessel owners participating in the Northeast and Southeast
Regional Integrated Registration Program. Vessel or gear owners
participating in the Northeast and Southeast Regional Integrated
Registration Program will receive their authorization certificates as
follows:
1. Northeast Region vessel or gear owners participating in Category
I or II fisheries for which a state or Federal permit is required may
receive their authorization certificate and/or injury/mortality
reporting form by contacting the Northeast Regional Office at 978-281-
9300 x6505 or by visiting the Northeast Regional Office Web site
(https://www.nero.noaa.gov/prot_res/) and following instructions for
printing the necessary documents.
2. Southeast Region vessel or gear owners participating in Category
I or II fisheries for which a Federal permit is required, as well as
fisheries permitted by the states of North Carolina, South Carolina,
Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas may
receive their authorization certificate and/or injury/mortality
reporting form by contacting the Southeast Regional Office at 727-824-
5312 or by visiting the Southeast Regional Office Web site (https://
sero.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/pr.htm) and following instructions for printing
the necessary documents.
How Do I Renew My Registration Under the MMPA?
Vessel or gear owners that participate in Pacific Islands,
Southwest, or Alaska regional fisheries are automatically renewed and
should receive an authorization certificate by January 1 of each new
year. Vessel or gear owners in Washington and Oregon fisheries receive
authorization with each renewed state fishing license, the timing of
which varies based on target species. Vessel or gear owners who
participate in these regions and have not received authorization
certificates by January 1 or with renewed fishing licenses must contact
the appropriate NMFS Regional Office (see ADDRESSES).
Vessel or gear owners participating in Southeast or Northeast
regional fisheries may receive their authorization certificates by
calling the relevant NMFS Regional Office or visiting the relevant NMFS
Regional Office Web site (see How Do I Receive My Authorization
Certificate and Injury/Mortality Reporting Forms).
Am I Required to Submit Reports When I Injure or Kill a Marine Mammal
During the Course of Commercial Fishing Operations?
In accordance with the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1387(e)) and 50 CFR 229.6,
any vessel owner or operator, or gear owner or operator (in the case of
non-vessel fisheries), participating in a Category I, II, or III
fishery must report to NMFS all incidental injuries and mortalities of
marine mammals that occur during commercial fishing operations.
``Injury'' is defined in 50 CFR 229.2 as a wound or other physical
harm. In addition, any animal that ingests fishing gear or any animal
that is released with fishing gear entangling, trailing, or perforating
any part of the body is considered injured, regardless of the presence
of any wound or other evidence of injury, and must be reported. Injury/
mortality reporting forms and instructions for submitting forms to NMFS
can be downloaded from: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/pdfs/interactions/
mmap_reporting_form.pdf. Reporting requirements and procedures can be
found in 50 CFR 229.6.
Am I Required to Take an Observer Aboard My Vessel?
Fishers participating in a Category I or II fishery are required to
accommodate an observer aboard vessel(s) upon request. Observer
requirements can be found in 50 CFR 229.7.
Am I Required to Comply With Any Take Reduction Plan Regulations?
Fishers participating in a Category I or II fishery are required to
comply with any applicable take reduction plans. Refer to Table 4 in
this document for a list of fisheries affected by take reduction teams
and plans. Take reduction plan regulations can be found at 50 CFR
229.30-35.
Sources of Information Reviewed for the Proposed 2009 LOF
NMFS reviewed the marine mammal incidental serious injury and
mortality information presented in the SARs for all observed fisheries
to determine whether changes in fishery classification were warranted.
NMFS' SARs are based on the best scientific information available at
the time of preparation, including the level of serious injury and
mortality of marine mammals that occurs incidental to commercial
fisheries and the PBR levels of marine mammal stocks. The information
contained in the SARs is reviewed by regional Scientific Review Groups
(SRGs) representing Alaska, the Pacific (including Hawaii), and the
U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean. The SRGs were created by
the MMPA to review the science that informs the SARs, and to advise
NMFS on population status and trends, stock structure, uncertainties in
the science, research needs, and other issues.
NMFS also reviewed other sources of new information, including
marine mammal stranding data, observer program data, fisher self-
reports, fishery management plans, ESA documents,
[[Page 33765]]
and other information that may not be included in the SARs.
The proposed LOF for 2009 was based, among other things, on
information provided in the NEPA and ESA documents analyzing authorized
high seas fisheries, and the final SARs for 1996 (63 FR 60, January 2,
1998), the final SARs for 2001 (67 FR 10671, March 8, 2002), the final
SARs for 2002 (68 FR 17920, April 14, 2003), the final SARs for 2003
(69 FR 54262, September 8, 2004), the final SARs for 2004 (70 FR 35397,
June 20, 2005), the final SARs for 2005 (71 FR 26340, May 4, 2006), the
final SARs for 2006 (72 FR 12774, March 19, 2007), the final SARs for
2007 (73 FR 21111, April 18, 2008), and the draft SARs for 2008. All
the SARs are available at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/sars/.
Fishery Descriptions
NMFS described each Category I and II fishery on the LOF for 2008
in the final 2008 LOF (72 FR 66048, November 27, 2007). Below, NMFS
briefly describes each fishery listed as a Category I or II fishery
appearing on the LOF for the first time. Additional details for
Category I and II fisheries operating in U.S. waters are included in
the SARs, Fishery Management Plans (FMPs), and Take Reduction Plans
(TRPs), or through state agencies. Additional details for Category I
and II fisheries operating on the high seas are included in various
FMPs, NEPA, or ESA documents.
High Seas Atlantic Highly Migratory Species Fisheries
The Atlantic Highly Migratory Species (HMS) high seas fisheries are
similar to fisheries targeting Atlantic HMS within U.S. waters, but
primarily use pelagic longline gear. Atlantic swordfish and bigeye tuna
are the primary target species on the high seas, with Atlantic
yellowfin, albacore and skipjack tunas, and pelagic and some deepwater
sharks also caught and retained for sale. Bluefin tuna are caught
incidental to pelagic longline operations, both on the high seas and
within U.S. waters, and may be retained subject to specific target
catch requirements.
Within U.S. waters, HMS commercial fishers use several gear types.
Authorized gear for tuna include speargun (except when targeting
bluefin), rod and reel, handlines, bandit gear, harpoon, pelagic
longline, trap (pound net and fish weir), and purse seine. Purse seines
used to target bluefin tuna must have a mesh size of less than or equal
to 4.5 in (11.4 cm) and at least 24-count thread throughout the net.
Only rod and reel gear may be used to target billfish and commercial
possession of Atlantic billfish is prohibited. Authorized gear for
sharks includes rod and reel, handline, bandit gear, longline, and
gillnet. Gillnets must be less than or equal to 2.5 km (1.6 mi) in
length. Authorized gear for swordfish includes handline, handgear
(including buoy gear), and longline for north Atlantic swordfish, and
longline for south Atlantic swordfish. North Atlantic swordfish
incidentally taken in squid trawls may be retained. The fishery
management area for Atlantic HMS includes U.S. waters and the adjacent
high seas.
Atlantic HMS are managed under regulations implementing the
Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP (2006), under the authority of the MSA
and the Atlantic Tunas Convention Act (ATCA). Regulations issued under
the MSA address the target fish species, as well as bycatch of species
protected by the ESA, MMPA, and Migratory Bird Treaty Act. The MSA
regulations (50 CFR part 635) require vessel owners and operators
targeting Atlantic HMS with longline or gillnet gear to complete
protected species (sea turtles and marine mammals) safe handling,
release, and identification workshops. The regulations also require
shark dealers to complete an Atlantic shark identification workshop.
The high seas components of Atlantic HMS fisheries are extensions
of various Category I II, and III fisheries operating in U.S. waters
(Tables 1 and 2). The longline fishery targeting Atlantic HMS in U.S.
waters is the Category I, ``Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico
large pelagics longline fishery.'' NMFS is currently developing
regulations to implement the Pelagic Longline Take Reduction Plan
(PLTRP) for this fishery. The gillnet fishery targeting Atlantic HMS in
U.S. waters is the Category II, ``Southeastern U.S. Atlantic shark
gillnet'' fishery. This fishery is subject to the Bottlenose Dolphin
TRP (BDTRP) (50 CFR 229.35), for coastal gillnetting only, and the
Atlantic Large Whale TRP (ALWTRP) (50 CFR 229.32). The purse seine
fishery targeting Atlantic HMS in U.S. waters is the Category III,
``Atlantic tuna purse seine fishery.''
For more information on the Atlantic HMS fisheries and details on
the management and regulations of these fisheries, please see the
Consolidated Atlantic HMS FMP (https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/sfa/hms/
hmsdocument_files/FMPs.htm) and the regulations for Atlantic HMS
fisheries in 50 CFR part 635.
High Seas Pacific Highly Migratory Species Fisheries
The Pacific HMS high seas fisheries are virtually the same as
fisheries targeting Pacific HMS within U.S. waters. Pacific HMS
fisheries target tunas (North Pacific albacore, yellowfin, bigeye,
skipjack, and bluefin), billfish (striped marlin), sharks (common
thresher, pelagic thresher, bigeye thresher, shortfin mako, and blue),
swordfish, and dorado (i.e., dolphinfish) using several gear types.
Authorized gear include surface hook-and-line (including troll, rod and
reel, handline, albacore jig, and live bait), harpoon (non-mechanical),
drift gillnet (14 in (35.5 cm) stretch mesh or greater), pelagic
longline, and purse seine (including ring, drum, and lampara nets).
Pacific HMS incidentally caught by unauthorized gear may be landed
under certain circumstances. Species prohibited in Pacific HMS
fisheries include any salmon species, great white shark, basking shark,
megamouth shark, and Pacific halibut. The fishery management area for
Pacific HMS covers U.S. waters from the U.S.-Mexico border to the U.S.-
Canada border, and the adjacent high seas.
Pacific HMS are managed under regulations implementing the FMP for
U.S. West Coast Fisheries for HMS, adopted in April 2004. The MSA
regulations (50 CFR part 660, subpart K) address the target fish
species as well as species protected by the ESA and MMPA. The MSA
regulations lay out multiple restrictions for fishing for Pacific HMS
with longline gear. Vessels fishing longline gear may not target HMS
within U.S. waters. Targeting swordfish with shallow set longline gear
or possessing a light stick on board the vessel west of 150[deg] W.
long. and north of the equator is prohibited. From April 1-May 31,
longline gear is prohibited in the area bounded on the south by the
equator, north by 15[deg] N. lat., east by 145[deg] W. long., and west
by 180[deg] long. Longline vessels must have a valid protected species
workshop certificate onboard, along with safe handling and release
tools for sea turtles and seabirds.
Along with the MSA requirements, including area closures for marine
mammal and sea turtle protection, drift gillnet fishing for Pacific HMS
is managed under the MMPA through the Pacific Offshore Cetacean Take
Reduction Plan (POCTRP) (50 CFR 229.31). The POCTRP regulations require
multiple gear modifications during the May 1-January 31 fishing season,
including a requirement that all extenders (buoy lines) be at least 6
fathoms (36 ft; 10.9 m) in length, all
[[Page 33766]]
floatlines be fished at a minimum of 36 ft (10.9 m) below the surface,
all nets have operational pingers to a water depth of a least 100
fathoms (600 ft; 182.9 m). Also, all drift gillnet vessel operators
must attend skipper education workshops before each fishing season.
The high seas components of Pacific HMS fisheries are extensions of
various Category I, II, and III fisheries operating within U.S. waters
(Tables 1 and 2). The drift gillnet fishery targeting Pacific HMS, the
Category I ``CA/OR thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet ([gteqt]14in.
mesh) fishery,'' is managed under the POCTRP. The purse seine fishery
targeting Pacific HMS within U.S. waters is the Category II ``CA tuna
purse seine fishery.'' While longline fishing for Pacific HMS is
prohibited within U.S. waters, the LOF includes the Category II ``CA
pelagic longline fishery'' to account for swordfish caught outside U.S.
waters, but landed into the U.S. West coast. The troll fishery
targeting Pacific HMS is an extension of U.S. waters Category III ``AK
North Pacific halibut, AK bottom fish, WA/OR/CA albacore, groundfish,
bottom fish, CA halibut non-salmonid troll fisheries.''
For more information on the Pacific HMS fisheries and details on
the management and regulations of these fisheries, please see the
Pacific HMS FMP (https://www.pcouncil.org/hms/hmsfmp.html#final), the
Pacific HMS FMP Biological Opinion (BiOp) (https://swr.nmfs.noaa.gov/
HMS_FMP_Opinion_Final.pdf), and the regulations for Pacific HMS in
50 CFR part 660, subpart K.
High Seas Western Pacific Pelagic Fisheries
The Western Pacific pelagic high seas fisheries are virtually the
same as fisheries targeting Wester Pacific pelagic species in U.S.
waters. Western Pacific pelagic fisheries target tunas (albacore,
bigeye, yellowfin, bluefin, and skipjack), billfish (Indo-Pacific blue
marlin, black marlin, striped marlin, shortbill spearfish), sharks
(pelagic thresher, bigeye thresher, common thresher, silky, oceanic
whitetip, blue, shortfin mako, longfin mako, and salmon), swordfish,
sailfish, wahoo, kawakawa, moonfish, pomfret, oilfish, and other tuna
relatives. The main gears used to fish in the Western Pacific Pelagic
fisheries are pelagic longline, troll, and handline. The Western
Pacific Pelagic fisheries take place in the Western Pacific Fishery
Management Area (including waters shoreward of the EEZ boundary around
American Samoa, Guam, Hawaii, the Northern Mariana Islands, Midway,
Johnston and Palmyra Atolls, Kingman Reef, and Wake, Jarvis, Baker, and
Howland Islands) and the adjacent high seas waters.
Western Pacific Pelagic fisheries are managed under regulations
implementing the FMP for the Pelagic Fisheries of the Western Pacific
Region developed by the Western Pacific Fishery Management Council
(WPFMC). The MSA regulations (50 CFR part 665, subpart C) address
target fish species as well as bycatch of species protected under the
ESA, MMPA, and Migratory Bird Treaty Act. The MSA regulations outline
restrictions on effort, observer coverage requirements, longline
fishing prohibited areas, sea turtle and seabird bycatch mitigation
measures, annual fleetwide limits on interactions with leatherback and
loggerhead sea turtles, and a requirement for owners of longline
vessels to participate in annual protected species workshops. Drift
gillnet fishing in the fishery management area is prohibited, except
where authorized by an experimental fishery permit.
The high seas components of the Western Pacific Pelagic longline
fishery are extensions of the Category I ``HI deep-set (tuna target)
longline/set line fishery'' and the Category II ``HI shallow-set
(swordfish target) longline/set line fishery'' (proposed to be split
into two fisheries from the ``HI swordfish, tuna, billfish, mahi mahi,
wahoo, oceanic sharks longline/set line fishery'' in this proposed
rule) operating within U.S. waters. All requirements for vessels
fishing longline gear within U.S. waters remain effective in high seas
waters (as described in the above paragraph).
For more information on the Western Pacific Pelagic fisheries and
details on the management and regulations of these fisheries, please
see the Western Pacific Pelagic FMP BiOp (https://www.fpir.noaa.gov/
Library/PUBDOCs/), the Western Pacific Pelagic FMP Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) (https://www.fpir.noaa.gov/Library/PUBDOCs/), and the
regulations for Western Pacific Pelagic fisheries in 50 CFR 665,
Subpart C.
High Seas South Pacific Albacore Troll Fisheries
The South Pacific albacore troll high seas fisheries target South
Pacific albacore using mostly longline or troll gear in waters solely
outside of any nation's EEZ. Longline gear, set with 1,000 or more
hooks suspended from a horizontally buoyed mainline several miles long,
accounts for 86 percent of the catch. Trolling vessels (including jigs
or live bait) attach 10-20 fishing lines of various lengths to the
vessel's outriggers on a slow-moving boat (5-6 knots). The total U.S.
catch of South Pacific albacore has accounted for less than 5 percent
of the total international catch in recent years.
U.S. vessels fish in the South Pacific albacore fishery from
November/December-April. Many vessels then participate in the larger
North Pacific albacore fishery from April-October. South Pacific
albacore fishing occurs outside any nation's EEZ in an area bounded by
approximately 110[deg] W. long. and 180[deg] W. long., and by 25[deg]
S. lat. and 45[deg] S. lat. Most U.S. troll vessels depart from the
U.S. West Coast or Hawaii and unload in American Samoa, Fiji, or
Tahiti.
The South Pacific albacore troll fishery is not managed by
regulations implementing any FMP. The WPFMC has concluded, and NMFS
agrees, that conservation and management measures for this fishery are
not warranted as the stock in not overfished and there are no known
protected species interactions. Sea turtles and marine mammals do not
prey on the bait species used by these vessels and vessels are
typically slow-moving and would therefore likely able to avoid a
collision with a whale. As of 2001, the HSFCA requires U.S. albacore
troll vessel operators to file logbooks with NMFS for fishing in the
South Pacific.
For more information on the South Pacific albacore troll fishery,
please see the 2004 U.S. South Pacific albacore troll fishery
Environmental Assessment (EA) (https://www.fpir.noaa.gov/Library/
PUBDOCs/). There are no regulations governing these fisheries.
High Seas South Pacific Tuna Fisheries
The South Pacific Tuna Treaty (SPTT) manages access of U.S. purse
seine vessels targeting tuna (skipjack and yellowfin) within the EEZs
of 16 Pacific Island Countries in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean
that are party to the Treaty. The SPTT Area includes the waters from
north of 60[deg] S. lat. and east of 90[deg] E. long. subject to the
fishing jurisdiction of Pacific Island parties, and all waters within
rhumb lines connecting multiple geographic coordinates, and north along
the 152[deg] E. long. out to Australia's EEZ border. The Treaty Area
includes portions of waters in the EEZs of most of the Pacific Island
Countries included in the Treaty. The SPTT is intended to apply only to
U.S. purse seine vessels; however, provisions have been made to
accommodate high seas fishing by U.S. albacore tuna troll and U.S.
longline vessels within the Treaty Area. Both a SPTT and a HSFCA permit
are required to fish in SPTT waters.
[[Page 33767]]
Under the SPTT, observers are recruited from the Pacific Island
Countries and then trained and deployed by the Forum Fisheries Agency
(FFA) in Honiara in the Solomon Islands. Many of the FFA deployed
observers serve in and have experience from domestic observer programs
active in each observer's respective country. The target observer level
coverage is 20 percent of U.S. purse seine vessels, the full costs of
which are the responsibility of the U.S. purse seine vessel owners.
Observers collect a range of data, including a form for recording
information on interactions with seabirds, sea turtles, marine mammals,
and sharks. Fishery observers undergo training in species
identification for target and bycatch species; however, marine mammal
species identification has only recently been placed as a priority
matter for reporting. Observer data from January 1997-June 2002 show
that 11 sets resulted in interactions with marine mammals. However, the
data indicate only that the animals were ``unidentified whales, marine
mammals, or dolphin/porpoise.'' The International Fisheries Division in
the NMFS Pacific Islands Region is working with the FFA observer
program to better train observers in marine mammal identification.
For additional information on the South Pacific Tuna Treaty and
details on the management and regulations of these fisheries, see the
South Pacific Tuna Treaty EA (https://www.fpir.noaa.gov/Library/PUBDOCs/
) and the regulations for the South Pacific Tuna Treaty in 50 CFR 300,
subpart D.
High Seas Antarctic Living Marine Resources Fisheries
The Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living
Resources (Convention or CCAMLR) conserves and manages Antarctic marine
living resources (AMLR) in waters surrounding Antarctica. The
Convention applies to AMLR in the waters from 60[deg] S. lat. south to
the Antarctic Convergence, with limited exceptions, covering 32.9
million square kilometers. Both an AMLR and a HSFCA permit are required
to fish in CCAMLR waters. There are multiple gear types used to target
multiple species in the Convention Area. Gear types include pelagic and
bottom trawl, trap/pot, gillnet, and longline. Target species include
krill and Antarctic finfish (rockcod species, toothfish species,
icefish species, silverfish, cod, and lanternfish), mollusks, and
crustaceans. CCAMLR Conservation Measures require or recommend several
measures for fisheries in the Convention area. Mandatory measures
include requirements for reporting; operating a Vessel Monitoring
System while in the Convention area; longline gear modifications to
reduce seabird interactions; mesh sizes restrictions for trawl gear.
Recommendations include seal bycatch mitigation measures, such as a
seal excluder device.
CCAMLR has identified two types of scientifically trained observers
to collect information required in CCAMLR-managed fisheries, including
information on entanglements and incidental mortality of seabirds and
marine mammals. The first type of observer is a ``national
observer,such as a U.S. observer placed on a U.S. vessel by
the U.S. Government. The second type of observer is an ``international
observer,'' or an observer operating in accordance with bilateral
arrangements between the Nation whose vessel is fishing and the nation
providing the observer. CCAMLR Conservation measures require all
fishing vessels in the Convention area (except vessels fishing for
krill) to carry at least one international observer and, where
possible, an additional observer. The United States requires all of its
vessels fishing in the CCAMLR area, for any target species and with any
gear, to carry an observer. In certain exploratory toothfish fisheries,
the vessel must carry two observers, with at least one being an
international observer.
For additional information on the fishing activities in the CCAMLR
region and details on the management and regulations of these
fisheries, see the CCAMLR Programmatic EIS https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
sfa/domes_fish/news_of_note.htmccamlr), the CCAMLR Schedule
of Conservation Measures in Force (https://www.ccamlr.org), and the
regulations for the harvesting of AMLR in 50 CFR 300, subpart D.
CA spot prawn pot
The ``CA spot prawn pot fishery'' (proposed to be listed as a
Category II in this rule) operates from Central CA southward to the
Mexican border. Strings of 10-50 oblong cylindrical traps are commonly
fished at depths usually greater than 100 fathoms. This is a limited
access fishery managed by the state of CA. A tiered permit system has
been implemented allowing a maximum of 150 or 500 traps to be fished at
one time depending on the fishing history associated with the permit. A
maximum of 300 traps may be located within state waters (inside 3
miles), regardless of permit tier. North of Point Arguello, the season
is open from August 1-April 30. South of Point Arguello, the season
runs from February 1-October 30.
CA Dungeness crab pot
The ``CA Dungeness crab pot fishery'' (proposed to be listed as a
Category II in this rule) operates along the central and northern
coastal waters of CA in depths typically from 10-40 fathoms. The
cylindrical or rectangular pots used in the fishery are buoyed, or
fished, individually, although fishing strings of multiple traps are
allowed in the central region. There is no limit on the number of traps
which may operated by a fisherman at one time. This is a limited access
fishery managed in part by the State of California and the Tri-State
Committee agreement for Dungeness crab, which also includes the states
of OR and WA. The fishery is divided into two management areas. The
central region (south of the Mendocino-Sonoma county line) is open
November 15-June 30. The northern region (north of the Mendocino-Sonoma
county line) can open on December 1, but may be delayed by the
California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) based on the condition of
market crabs, and continues until July 15.
OR Dungeness crab pot
The ``OR Dungeness crab pot fishery'' (proposed to be listed as a
Category II in this rule) operates along the coastal waters of OR in
depths typically from 10-40 fathoms. This is a limited access fishery
managed by the OR Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) in conjunction
with the Tri-State Committee agreement for Dungeness crab, which also
includes the states of CA and WA. The Dungeness crab season runs from
December 1-August 14, although the state may delay the opening based on
the condition of the crabs. Additionally, the state may close the
season after the end of May if catch rates are still high to protect
molting crab. A three-tiered pot limitation system has been implemented
allowing a maximum 200, 300, or 500 pots to be fished at once depending
on previous landing history. Logbook reporting of effort and catch data
to the state is now required. The cylindrical or rectangular pots used
in the fishery are fished individually by law.
WA/OR/CA sablefish pot
The ``CA/OR/WA sablefish pot fishery'' (proposed to be listed as a
Category II in this rule) sets gear in waters past the 100 fathom curve
off the West coast of the U.S. In CA, gear is set outside 150 fathoms,
with an average depth of 190 fathoms. There are two separate trap
fisheries, open access and
[[Page 33768]]
limited entry, and both have quotas. Open access fishers will usually
fish 1 to 8 strings of 3-4 pots, each with a float line and buoy stick.
The gear sometimes soaks for long periods. Fishers in the limited entry
fishery will normally fish 20-30 pot strings. The fishery operates year
round and effort varies from southern CA to the Canadian border.
This fishery is managed under regulations implementing the West
Coast Groundfish FMP developed by Pacific Fishery Management Council.
Access to the limited entry fishery is granted under a limited entry
permit system, in addition to gear endorsements required by the
individual states. Open access privileges are currently available to
any fisherman with the requisite state gear endorsement, but involve
much more restrictive limitations in catch quotas and additional area
closures than the primary limited entry permit. Open access quotas vary
based upon the area being fished. The limited entry fishery is open
from April 1-October 31, while open access is available year-round.
Limited entry permits are tiered based on the annual cumulative
landings allowed by each permit. Permits are transferable, but the tier
category remains fixed. Up to three limited entry permits may be
stacked on a single vessel. As with most pot gear fished out in deeper
waters, sablefish traps are set in strings of multiple traps.
Summary of Changes to the LOF for 2009
The following summarizes changes to the LOF for 2009 in fishery
classification, fisheries listed in the LOF, the number of participants
in a particular fishery, and the species and/or stocks that are
incidentally killed or seriously injured in a particular fishery. The
classifications and definitions of U.S. commercial fisheries for 2009
are identical to those provided in the LOF for 2008 with the proposed
changes discussed below. State abbreviations used in the following
paragraphs include: AK (Alaska), AL (Alabama), CA (California), DE
(Delaware), FL (Florida), GA (Georgia), HI (Hawaii), LA (Louisiana), MA
(Massachusetts), ME (Maine), MS (Mississippi), NC (North Carolina), NJ
(New Jersey), NY (New York), OR (Oregon), RI (Rhode Island), SC (South
Carolina), TX (Texas), VA (Virginia), and WA (Washington).
Commercial Fisheries on the High Seas
NMFS proposes to add high seas fisheries to the LOF, beginning with
the 2009 LOF. NMFS is soliciting public comments on the proposed
process for including high seas fisheries on the LOF (presented in the
preamble under the section ``Are high seas fisheries included on the
LOF?''), the fishery descriptions for the authorized high seas
fisheries (presented in the preamble under the section ``Fishery
descriptions''), and the proposed fishery additions described below.
Addition of Fisheries to the LOF
High Seas Atlantic Highly Migratory Species Fisheries
NMFS proposes to add the U.S.-authorized high seas Atlantic HMS
fisheries to the LOF. The Atlantic HMS high seas fisheries include all
fisheries using multiple gear types to target Atlantic HMS (described
in the ``Fishery Descriptions'' section in the preamble of this
proposed rule). Due to the lack of specific information on marine
mammal abundance and marine mammal-fishery interactions on the high
seas, NMFS proposes to categorize all fisheries targeting Atlantic HMS
on the high seas with gear other than longline and purse seine (e.g.,
gillnet, trawl, handline, and troll gear) as Category II. Category II
is the appropriate classification for new fisheries on the LOF for
which there is little information on which to base classification. NMFS
proposes to categorize the longline component of this fishery as a
Category I because it is an extension of the Category I ``Atlantic
Ocean, Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico large pelagics longline'' fishery
operating within U.S. waters. The gear used, fishing methods, and
target species are the same, and longline vessels targeting Atlantic
HMS regularly cross into the high seas, and back, when fishing. NMFS
proposes to categorize the purse seine component of this fishery as a
Category III because it is an extension of the Category III ``U.S.
Atlantic tuna purse seine fishery'' operating within U.S. waters. There
are 88 valid HSFCA permits for fishers targeting Atlantic HMS on the
high seas with all gear types. As noted in the preamble, the number of
valid permits may not accurately account for annual fishing effort on
the high seas. Please see the discussion on the HSFCA permitting
process under the section ``Are high seas fisheries included on the
LOF?'' in the preamble of this proposed rule for additional details.
Many marine mammal species interacting with Atlantic HMS fisheries
operating in U.S. waters also inhabit the high seas. Observer coverage
for the Category I pelagic longline fishery extends into the high seas,
so information is available on which marine mammal stocks are
incidentally taken by this fishery on the high seas. For this reason,
NMFS proposes to list the marine mammal species that have been
documented killed or injured in the Category I high seas longline
component of Atlantic HMS fisheries in Table 3.
Similar observer data are not available for the high seas Atlantic
HMS drift gillnet fishery, which is an extension of the Category II
``Southeastern U.S. Atlantic shark gillnet fishery''; or the purse
seine fishery, which is an extension of the Category III ``Atlantic
tuna purse seine fishery.'' For those fisheries where no interaction
data (observer or other data) exist on the high seas, NMFS proposes to
list all the non-coastal marine mammal species/stocks killed or injured
in the portion of the fishery that operates in U.S. waters as injured
or killed in the same fishery operating on the high seas in Table 3.
Specifically, NMFS proposes to add all non-coastal marine mammal
species killed or injured in the Category II ``Southeastern U.S.
Atlantic shark gillnet fishery'' (operating within U.S. waters) as
injured or killed in the Category II drift gillnet component of the
Atlantic HMS fisheries (operating on the high seas). Also, NMFS
proposes to list all non-coastal marine mammal species killed or
injured in the Category III purse seine component of the Atlantic HMS
fisheries (operating within U.S. waters) as injured or killed in the
Category III ``Atlantic tuna purse seine fishery'' (operating on the
high seas).
There is little information on interactions between marine mammals
and fishing gear used to target Atlantic HMS on the high seas, other
than that listed in the previous paragraphs. Given the lack of data on
marine mammal abundance and interactions with high seas Atlantic HMS
fisheries (excluding the longline, drift gillnet, and purse seine
components), NMFS proposes to list the marine mammal species killed or
injured in these fisheries as ``undetermined'' in Table 3.
High Seas Pacific Highly Migratory Species Fisheries
NMFS proposes to add the U.S.-authorized high seas Pacific HMS
fisheries to the LOF. The Pacific HMS fisheries include all fisheries
using multiple gear types to target Pacific HMS (described in the
``Fishery Descriptions'' section in the preamble of this proposed
rule). Due to the lack of specific information on marine mammal
abundance and interactions with Pacific HMS high seas fisheries, NMFS
proposes to categorize all fisheries targeting Pacific HMS on the high
seas with gear other than drift gillnet and
[[Page 33769]]
troll (e.g., longline, gillnet, trawl, purse seine, and handline gear)
as Category II. Category II is the appropriate classification for new
fisheries on the LOF for which there is little information on which to
base classification as described in the definition for ``Category II''
in 50 CFR 229.2. NMFS proposes to categorize the drift gillnet
component of this fishery as a Category I because it is an extension of
the Category I ``CA/OR thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet
([gteqt]14 in. mesh) fishery'' operating within U.S. waters. The gear
used, fishing methods, and target species are the same in U.S. waters
and on the high seas. Similarly, NMFS proposes to categorize the troll
component of this fishery as a Category III because it is an extension
of the Category III ``AK North Pacific halibut, AK bottom fish, WA/OR/
CA albacore, groundfish, bottom fish, CA halibut non-salmonid troll
fisheries'' operating within U.S. waters.
There are 344 valid HSFCA permits for fishers targeting Pacific HMS
on the high seas using all gear types. As noted in the preamble, the
number of valid permits may not accurately account for annual fishing
effort on the high seas. Please see the discussion on the HSFCA
permitting process under the section ``Are high seas fisheries included
on the LOF?'' in the preamble of this proposed rule for additional
details.
Many marine mammal species interacting with Pacific HMS fisheries
operating in U.S. waters also inhabit the high seas. Thus, fishing
vessels that cross into the high seas are also likely to interact with
these marine mammals once they cross into the high seas. For those
fisheries where no interaction data (observer or other data) exist on
the high seas, NMFS proposes to list all the non-coastal marine mammal
species/stocks killed or injured in the portion of the fishery that
operates in U.S. waters as injured or killed in the same fishery
operating on the high seas in Table 3.
NMFS proposes to add all non-coastal marine mammal species killed
or injured in the Category I ``CA/OR thresher shark/swordfish drift
gillnet (>14 in mesh) fishery'' (operating within U.S. waters) as
injured or killed in the associated drift gillnet component of Pacific
HMS fisheries (operating on the high seas).
NMFS proposes to add all non-coastal marine mammal species killed
or injured in the Category II ``CA tuna purse seine fishery''
(operating within U.S. waters) as injured or killed in the associated
purse seine component of the Pacific HMS fisheries (operating on the
high seas).
NMFS proposes to list all marine mammal species killed or injured
in the Category II ``CA pelagic longline fishery'' as injured or killed
in the associated longline component of the Pacific HMS fisheries
(operating on the high seas). This fishery is currently prohibited
within U.S. waters, but remains listed on Table 1 because catch is
landed on the U.S. West coast. Therefore, the marine mammal species
listed as killed or injured in this fishery were observed taken on the
high seas.
There is little information on interactions between marine mammals
and fishing gear used to target Pacific HMS on the high seas, other
than that listed in the previous paragraphs. Given the lack of data on
marine mammal abundance and interactions with high seas Pacific HMS
fisheries (excluding the longline, drift gillnet, and purse seine
components), NMFS proposes to list the marine mammal species killed or
injured in these fisheries as ``undetermined'' in Table 3.
High Seas Western Pacific Pelagic Fisheries
NMFS proposes to add the U.S.-authorized high seas Western Pacific
pelagic fisheries to the LOF. The Western Pacific pelagic fisheries
include all fisheries using multiple gear types to target Western
Pacific pelagic species (described in the ``Fishery Descriptions''
section in the preamble of this proposed rule). Due to the lack of
specific information on marine mammal abundance and interactions with
fisheries on the high seas, NMFS proposes to categorize all fisheries
targeting Western Pacific