Notice of HUD's Fiscal Year (FY) 2008 General Section and FY2008 SuperNOFA for HUD's Discretionary Grant Programs; Correction, 33446-33451 [E8-13285]
Download as PDF
33446
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 114 / Thursday, June 12, 2008 / Notices
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard
Mitigation Grant.)
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency
Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E8–13204 Filed 6–11–08; 8:45 am]
[Docket No. FR–5200–C–01A2]
AGENCY:
ACTION:
BILLING CODE 9110–10–P
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
[FEMA–1754–DR]
Oklahoma; Amendment No. 1 to Notice
of a Major Disaster Declaration
Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice
of a major disaster declaration for the
State of Oklahoma (FEMA–1754–DR),
dated May 9, 2008, and related
determinations.
June 2, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance
Directorate, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–2705.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice
of a major disaster declaration for the
State of Oklahoma is hereby amended to
include the following area among those
areas determined to have been adversely
affected by the catastrophe declared a
major disaster by the President in his
declaration of May 9, 2008.
Kingfisher County for Public Assistance.
(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used
for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora
Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling;
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034,
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA);
97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant;
97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to
Individuals and Households In Presidential
Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidential
Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster
Housing Operations for Individuals and
Households; 97.050 Presidential Declared
Disaster Assistance to Individuals and
Households—Other Needs, 97.036, Disaster
Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard
Mitigation Grant.)
R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency
Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E8–13205 Filed 6–11–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–10–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:47 Jun 11, 2008
Jkt 214001
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Notice of HUD’s Fiscal Year (FY) 2008
General Section and FY2008
SuperNOFA for HUD’s Discretionary
Grant Programs; Correction
Office of the Secretary, HUD.
Super Notice of Funding
Availability (SuperNOFA) for HUD
Discretionary Grant Programs;
correction.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
EFFECTIVE DATE:
to the NOFA Information Center
between the hours of 10 a.m. and 6:30
p.m. Eastern Time at (800) HUD–8929.
Hearing-impaired persons may call 800–
HUD–2209. For the programs listed in
this notice, please contact the office or
individual listed under section VII of
the applicable program sections of the
SuperNOFA, published on May 12,
2008.
SUMMARY: On March 19, 2008, HUD
published its Notice of Fiscal Year (FY)
2008 Notice of Funding Availability
(NOFA); Policy Requirements and
General Section to HUD’s FY2008
NOFAs for Discretionary Programs
(General Section). On May 12, 2008,
HUD published its FY2008 SuperNOFA,
for HUD’s Discretionary Grant Programs.
This document corrects the hourly rate
for consultants as published in the
March 19, 2008, General Section. This
document also makes corrections or
clarifications to the following sections
of the May 12, 2008, SuperNOFA:
Appendix A of the Introduction to the
SuperNOFA, the Lead-Based Paint
Hazard Control Grant Program, Lead
Hazard Reduction Demonstration Grant
Program, and Operation Lead
Elimination Action Program; the Lead
Outreach Grant Program; the Housing
Choice Voucher Family Self-Sufficiency
Program; the Resident Opportunity and
Self-Sufficiency (ROSS) Service
Coordinators Program; and the Self-Help
Homeownership Opportunity Program
(SHOP). Finally, this notice provides
notice to all applicants regarding a
technical issue with the Grants.gov SF–
424 form and provides guidance to
address the issue.
DATES: The application submission
dates for the Lead-Based Paint Hazard
Control Grant Program, Lead Hazard
Reduction Demonstration Grant
Program, and Operation Lead
Elimination Action Program NOFA, the
Lead Outreach Grant Program NOFA,
and the Resident Opportunity and SelfSufficiency (ROSS) Service
Coordinators Program NOFA remain as
published in the Federal Register on
May 12, 2008. The deadline date for the
Housing Choice Voucher Program has
been moved to July 16, 2008. The
deadline date for the Self-Help
Homeownership Opportunity Program
(SHOP) has been moved to July 18,
2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Questions regarding the General Section
of March 19, 2008, should be directed
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
On March
19, 2008 (73 FR 14882), HUD published
its Notice of Fiscal Year (FY) 2008
Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA);
Policy Requirements and General
Section to HUD’s FY2008 NOFAs for
Discretionary Programs (General
Section). Early publication of the
General Section was intended to
provide prospective applicants
additional time to become familiar with
and address those provisions in the
General Section that constitute part of
almost every application. On May 12,
2008 (73 FR 27032), HUD published its
Notice of HUD’s Fiscal Year (FY) 2008
SuperNOFA for HUD’s Discretionary
Grant Programs. The FY 2008
SuperNOFA announced the availability
of approximately $1.02 billion in HUD
assistance. This notice published in
today’s Federal Register corrects the
hourly rate for consultants as published
in the March 19, 2008, General Section.
This notice also makes technical
corrections to the following sections of
the May 12, 2008, SuperNOFA:
Appendix A of the Introduction to the
SuperNOFA; the Lead-Based Paint
Hazard Control Grant Program, Lead
Hazard Reduction Demonstration Grant
Program, and Operation Lead
Elimination Action Program; the Lead
Outreach Grant Program; the Housing
Choice Voucher Family Self-Sufficiency
Program; the Resident Opportunity and
Self-Sufficiency (ROSS) Service
Coordinators Program; and the Self-Help
Homeownership Opportunity Program
(SHOP). This notice also provides notice
to all applicants regarding a technical
issue with the Grants.gov SF–424 form
in the funding opportunity Application
Package and provides guidance to
address the issue.
I. Correction of General Section
On March 19, 2008 (73 FR 14882),
HUD published its General Section. At
page 14887, section III.C.4.l., second
column, HUD stated that the hourly
wage for the equivalent of General
Schedule 15, Step 10 base pay rate is
$57.90. The correct hourly rate for the
equivalent of General Schedule 15, Step
10 base pay rate is actually $59.42.
Accordingly, at page 14887, section
III.C.4.l., second column, in the March
E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM
12JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 114 / Thursday, June 12, 2008 / Notices
19, 2008, Notice of HUD’s FY2008,
Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA),
Policy Requirements and General
Section to the SuperNOFA for HUD’s
Discretionary Grant Programs, the
following correction is made:
1. Salary Limitation for Consultants.
FY2008 funds may not be used to pay
or to provide reimbursement for
payment of the salary of a consultant,
whether retained by the federal
government or the grantee, at a rate
more than the equivalent of General
Schedule 15, Step 10 base pay rate for
which the annual rate for FY2008 is
$124,010. The hourly rate is $59.42.
II. Summary of Technical Corrections
On May 12, 2008, HUD published its
FY2008 SuperNOFA. Today’s
publication corrects certain sections of
the SuperNOFA. Summaries of the
technical corrections made by this
document follow. The page number
shown in brackets identifies where the
individual funding availability
announcement that is being corrected
can be found in the May 12, 2008,
SuperNOFA. The technical correction
described in today’s Federal Register
will also be reflected in the application
instructions located on Grants.gov/
Apply. Applicants who have submitted
their applications prior to this
publication can choose to resubmit an
updated application that reflects the
corrections and clarifications. The last
application received and validated by
Grants.gov by the deadline date will be
the application that is reviewed and
rated.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Introduction to the SuperNOFA—
Appendix A [27035]
As discussed in this technical
correction notice, HUD is moving the
application deadline dates for the
Housing Choice Voucher Family SelfSufficiency and SHOP NOFAs. The new
deadline date for the Housing Choice
Voucher Family Self-Sufficiency NOFA
will be July 16, 2008. The new deadline
date for the SHOP NOFA will be July
18, 2008. HUD is, therefore, correcting
the entries for the Housing Choice
Voucher Family Self-Sufficiency
Program and the SHOP NOFAs on
Appendix A to reflect these changes.
Lead-Based Paint Hazard Control Grant
Program, Lead Hazard Reduction
Demonstration Grant Program, and
Operation Lead Elimination Action
Program [27159]
On page 27161, Section I.B.4., first
column, and on page 27168, Section
IV.F.2, first column, the deadline date
for applicants to request a waiver of the
25 percent match requirement does not
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:47 Jun 11, 2008
Jkt 214001
match the date posted on Grants.gov.
HUD is correcting the deadline date to
request a waiver in the SuperNOFA to
match that listed on Grants.gov.
Lead Outreach Grant Program [27188]
On page 27189, Section II entitled
‘‘Eligibility Information’’, third column,
HUD inadvertently identified this
section as section ‘‘II.’’ It should be
section ‘‘III.’’
On page 27190, section III entitled
‘‘application and submission
information’’, second column, HUD
inadvertently identified this section as
section ‘‘iii.’’ it should be section ‘‘iv.’’
On page 27191, section v.a, third
column, HUD incorrectly crossreferenced to information discussing
threshold requirements and is deleting
the incorrect cross-reference.
On page 27193, section V.A.3.e.(3),
second column, HUD is correcting the
requirement for including a separate
budget and budget narrative when subgrantees receive a portion of the award.
These corrections are also reflected in
the instructions found on Grants.gov/
Apply. Applicants must download the
instructions to receive all forms and
instructions related to this NOFA.
Applicants are encouraged to read the
instructions on Grants.gov/Apply prior
to submitting your application in
response to the Lead Outreach Program
funding opportunity.
Housing Choice Voucher Family SelfSufficiency (FSS) Program [27210]
On page 27211, paragraph F under
‘‘Overview Information’’, first column,
as discussed in this notice, HUD is
moving the deadline date for
applications to July 16, 2008.
On page 27213, section III.C.3.g.
entitled ‘‘Affirmatively Furthering Fair
Housing’’, HUD is revising the timeline
for applicants to submit their plans to
affirmatively further fair housing
(AFFH). Specifically, HUD is changing
the date for applicants to submit this
plan from prior to the application date
to prior to the award of funding. This
extension is required because
implementation of an AFFH policy for
the FSS program trigger a 45-day public
comment period for the proposed AFFH
policy followed by board approval of
the policy prior to submission to HUD.
The original application deadline did
not allow sufficient time for PHAs to
complete the steps required for approval
and submission of their AFFH
statements.
These corrections are also reflected in
the instructions found on Grants.gov/
Apply. Applicants must download the
instructions to receive all forms and
instructions related to this NOFA.
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
33447
Applicants are encouraged to read the
instructions on Grants.gov/Apply prior
to submitting your application in
response to the Housing Choice Voucher
Family Self-Sufficiency Program
funding opportunity
Resident Opportunity and SelfSufficiency Coordinators Program
[27230]
On page 27230, section I.B.1, third
column, HUD is clarifying for applicants
how the number of occupied units
should be counted in order to determine
the number of positions for which an
applicant may apply.
On page 27232, section II.C.1.a., third
column, HUD is noting that more than
one person may job-share a Service
Coordinator position.
On page 27239, section V.B.2., first
column, entitled ‘‘Selection Process for
all Grant Categories and All
Applicants,’’ HUD is clarifying that all
Resident Association applicants, even
those that apply as nonprofits, must
have a contract administrator.
These corrections are also reflected in
the instructions found on Grants.gov/
Apply. Applicants must download the
instructions to receive all forms and
instructions related to this NOFA.
Applicants are encouraged to read the
instructions on Grants.gov/Apply prior
to submitting your application in
response to the Resident Opportunity
and Self-Sufficiency Coordinators
Program funding opportunity.
Self-Help Homeownership Opportunity
Program [27250]
On page 27250, section F under
‘‘Overview Information,’’ first column,
HUD is moving the deadline date for the
SHOP NOFA to July 18, 2008.
On page 27253, section III.C.4.e., first
column, HUD is clarifying the
requirement for applicants to reduce
energy costs.
On page 27254, section VI.C., second
column entitled, ‘‘Submission Date and
Time,’’ HUD is moving the deadline
date for the SHOP NOFA to July 18,
2008.
On page 27256, under ‘‘Submission
Requirements for Rating Factor 3,’’
section d., third column entitled ‘‘Cost
Effective to the Homebuyer,’’ HUD is
clarifying the requirement for applicants
to disclose the contract sales price to the
homebuyer and the appraised or market
value of the home.
On page 27258, section V.A.5, second
column entitled, ‘‘Rating Factor 5.
Achieving Result and Program
Evaluation (10 points),’’ HUD is
clarifying that applicants should
include actual or estimated costs for
utilities and any applicable
E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM
12JNN1
33448
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 114 / Thursday, June 12, 2008 / Notices
homeownership association fee when
comparing total housing costs of new
self-help units to previous rents.
On page 27258, section V.A.5, third
column entitled ‘‘Submission
Requirements for Rating Factor 5,’’ HUD
is revising this section to advises
applicants that HUD has developed and
posted on Grants.gov a revised eLogic
Model form that incorporates the
revision to Rating Factor 5 that instructs
applicants to include actual or
estimated utility and other costs. HUD
encourages applicants to download and
use the revised eLogic Model.
These corrections are also reflected in
the instructions found on Grants.gov/
Apply. Applicants must download the
instructions to receive all forms and
instructions related to this NOFA.
Applicants are encouraged to read the
instructions on Grants.gov/Apply prior
to submitting your application in
response to the Self-Help
Homeownership Opportunity Program
funding opportunity.
Accordingly, in the May 12, 2008,
Notice of HUD’s FY2008 SuperNOFA
for HUD’s Discretionary Grant Programs,
beginning at 73 FR 27032, the following
corrections are made.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Housing Choice Voucher Family Self-Sufficiency (FSS)
Program.
CFDA No: 14,871
OMB Approval No.: 2577–0178
Self-Help Homeownership Opportunity Program
(SHOP).
CFDA No: 14,247
OMB Approval No.: 2506–0157
2. Lead-Based Paint Hazard Control
Grant Program, Lead Hazard Reduction
Demonstration Grant Program, and
Operation Lead Elimination Action
Program [27159]
On page 27161, Section I.B.4., first
column, HUD is correcting this section
to read as follows:
4. Applicants to the LHRD grant
program may request a waiver of the 25
percent match requirement, if the
applicant submits a request that meets
HUD’s criteria. See unit III.B.2,
Eligibility Information, below. The
request for the waiver of the match, with
supporting narrative and
documentation, must be submitted in
accordance with unit IV.F.2, below, to
be received no later than June 23, 2008.
On page 27168, section IV.F.2, first
column, HUD is correcting this section
to read as follows:
2. Lead Hazard Reduction
Demonstration Grant Program match
waiver. Lead Hazard Reduction
Demonstration Grant Program
applicants requesting a waiver from the
25 percent match requirement are
required to submit a request by e-mail.
LHRD match waiver requests must be
submitted no later than 11:59 pm on
June 23, 2008, and should be submitted
to Jonnette Hawkins, Director, Programs
Division, Office of Healthy Homes and
Lead Hazard Control, at
Jonnette.G.Hawkins@hud.gov. HUD will
respond to the LHRD match waiver
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:47 Jun 11, 2008
Jkt 214001
$49,000,000
July 16, 2008.
26,500,000
July 18, 2008.
requests by e-mail no later than July 2,
2008, and, if a mailing address is
provided in a request, by letter within
5 working days thereafter.
3. Lead Outreach Grant Program
Beginning at Page 27188
On page 27189, Section II entitled
‘‘Eligibility Information’’, third column,
is corrected to read as follows:
III. Eligibility Information
On page 27190, section III entitled
‘‘Application and Submission
Information’’, second column, is
corrected to read as follows:
IV. Application and Submission
Information
On page 27191, section V.A, third
column, HUD is correcting this
paragraph to read as follows:
A. Criteria. Applications that meet all
of the threshold requirements will be
eligible to be scored and ranked, based
on the total number of points allocated
for each of the rating factors described
in this NOFA. The application must
receive a total score of at least 75 points
to be considered for funding.
On page 27193, section V.A.3.e.(3),
second column, HUD is correcting this
section to read as follows:
(3) Include a separate budget (HUD–
424–CBW) and budget narrative for any
sub-grantee receiving more than 10
percent of total budget request.
PO 00000
Frm 00062
At page 27035, as discussed in this
notice, HUD is moving the deadline date
for the Housing Choice Voucher Family
Self-Sufficiency Program to July 16,
2008. HUD is also moving the deadline
date for the SHOP NOFA to July 18,
2008. As a result, the entries for the
Housing Choice Voucher Family SelfSufficiency Program and SHOP NOFA
on Appendix A at page 27035 should
read as follows:
Application deadline
(All applications must be received and validated by
Grants.gov no later than 11:59:59 p.m., eastern time
on the application deadline date. See details in the
General Section.)
Approximate funding amounts
available
Programs included in the FY2008 SuperNOFA
1. Introduction to the SuperNOFA—
Appendix A Beginning at Page 27035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4. Housing Choice Voucher Family SelfSufficiency (FSS) Program beginning at
page 27210
On page 27211, paragraph F under
‘‘Overview Information’’, first column,
is corrected to read as follows:
F. Dates: The application deadline
date is July 16, 2008. Please see the
General Section for timely receipt
requirements.
On page 27213, section III.C.3.g.
entitled ‘‘Affirmatively Furthering Fair
Housing,’’ HUD is revising the second
sentence of this paragraph to read as
follows:
Prior to the award of funding under
this NOFA, each applicant must submit
to the public housing director in the
applicant’s local HUD field office an
addendum to the applicant’s HCV
administrative plan that outlines
reasonable steps the applicant will take
to affirmatively further fair housing in
its HCV FSS program and how it will
maintain records of those steps and
their impacts.
5. Resident Opportunity and SelfSufficiency Coordinators Program
Beginning at Page 27230
On page 27230, section I.B.1, third
column, HUD is correcting this
paragraph to read as follows:
1. For PHA and Tribe/TDHE
applicants, the number of positions is
determined by number of ACC units.
PHAs must use the number of occupied
E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM
12JNN1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 114 / Thursday, June 12, 2008 / Notices
conventional public housing units as of
September 30, 2007. Tribes/TDHEs must
use the number of units counted as
Formula Current Assisted Stock for FY
2007 as defined in 24 CFR 1000.316.
Tribes that have not previously received
funds from the Department under the
U.S. Housing Act of 1937 should count
housing units under management that
are owned and operated by the Tribe
and that are identified in their housing
inventory as of September 30, 2007.
Applicants may apply for up to 3
Service Coordinators depending on the
size and type of the applicant. Program
ratio for number of eligible Service
Coordinators is in the table above under
‘‘Award Amounts.’’
On page 27232, section II.C.1.a., third
column, correcting this section to read
as follows:
a. Salaries and fringe benefits of one
or more Service Coordinators. A parttime Service Coordinator may be
retained where appropriate, however,
the minimum units served remains the
same. One or more PHAs may share a
full-time position if that is deemed most
appropriate for the applicant’s program.
More than one person may job-share a
Service Coordinator position. Although
the exact role for the SC shall be
designed to meet the needs of the
project’s community, below is a listing
of recommended functions for an SC:
On page 27239, section V.B.2., first
column, entitled ‘‘Selection Process for
all Grant Categories and All Applicants,
HUD is correcting this section to read as
follows:
2. Selection Process for All Grant
Categories and All Applicants. All
qualified applications will be awarded
based on a lottery. Per statute, twentyfive percent (25%) of funds will be set
aside for Resident Associations and all
qualifying Resident Association
applications will be funded first, up to
25 percent of the funding amount. Even
if applying as non-profits, state,
national, and other incorporated nonprofit Resident Associations will be
included in this set-aside. To be
included in this Resident Association
Category, you must indicate your status
on the HUD–52768. If an applicant
indicates that they are a resident council
for the purposes of this lottery
designation, they must also supply a
contract administrator partner
agreement, even if applying as a
nonprofit applicant. If there are more
qualified resident organizations than
25% of the available funding, there will
be an initial lottery for all resident
organizations, then the remaining
resident organizations will be put
together with the rest of the qualified
applicants for a second general lottery.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:47 Jun 11, 2008
Jkt 214001
6. Self-Help Homeownership
Opportunity Program Beginning at Page
27250
On page 27250, section F under
‘‘Overview Information,’’ first column,
HUD is moving the deadline date for the
SHOP NOFA to July 18, 2008, therefore,
this section is corrected to read as
follows:
F. Dates: The application deadline
date for electronic submission and
validation in Grants.gov is July 18, 2008.
Applications submitted through https://
www.grants.gov must be received and
validated by Grants.gov no later than
11:59:59 Eastern time on the application
deadline date. The validation process
may take up to 72 hours.
On page 27253, section III.C.4.e., first
column, HUD is clarifying the
requirement for applicants to reduce
energy cost to read as follows.
e. Reduce Energy Costs. Applicants
are required to take specific energysaving actions. In the new construction
of self-help housing, SHOP applicants
must incorporate energy-efficiency
measures in the design and construction
of self-help housing units. All newly
constructed units assisted with SHOP
funds provided under this NOFA must
qualify and receive Energy Star
Certification by an independent Home
Energy Rater (HER) upon completions
and only Energy Star labeled products
and appliances may be used in these
units.
On page 27254, section VI.C., second
column entitled, ‘‘Submission Date and
Time,’’ HUD is moving the deadline
date for the SHOP NOFA to July 18,
2008, therefore, this section is corrected
to read as follows:
C. Submission Date and Time
The electronic application must be
received and validated no later than
11:59:59 p.m. Eastern time by
Grants.gov on the application deadline
date, which is July 18, 2008. The
validation process may take 24–48
hours. Applicants are advised to submit
applications 72 hours in advance. By
doing so, if your application fails
validation and Grants.gov rejects the
application, you have time to correct the
noted problems prior to the deadline
date. If an applicant is granted a waiver
to the electronic application submission
requirement, the application must be
received at HUD Headquarters by the
application deadline date (see General
Section).
On page 27256, under ‘‘Submission
Requirements for Rating Factor 3,’’
section d., third column entitled ‘‘Cost
Effective to the Homebuyer,’’ HUD is
clarifying the requirement for applicants
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
33449
to disclose the contract sales price to the
homebuyer and the appraised or market
value of the home to read as follows:
d. Cost Effective to the Homebuyer (7
points). State how the sales price for
SHOP-assisted units is established
(provide a table outlining separate costs
for land purchase and infrastructure
improvements paid by the affiliate; land
and infrastructure improvements
charged to the homebuyer; construction
and project-related soft costs, such as
architectural, engineering and related
professional services; and any other
costs charged to the homebuyer
including 2nd or additional mortgages
that must be repaid by the homebuyer
upon sale of the property). You must
include in the table the contract sales
price to the homebuyer and the
appraised or market value. You must
demonstrate the extent to which the
investment of SHOP funds, the
contribution of sweat equity and
volunteer labor, donations (e.g., land or
building materials), in-kind
contributions, and financing subsidies,
further reduce the sales price to the
homebuyer below the appraised value of
the house or market value of comparable
housing in the neighborhood. This must
be demonstrated for homebuyers
receiving both USDA and non-USDA
construction assistance. Applicants
showing a larger reduction of the sales
price to the homebuyer from the
appraised or market value as a result of
the use of the SHOP funds for costs that
are not charged to the homebuyer, the
SHOP homebuyer’s sweat equity,
volunteer labor, and other contributions
and subsidies not repaid by the
homebuyer will receive a higher score.
On page 27258, section V.A.5, second
column entitled, ‘‘Rating Factor 5.
Achieving Result and Program
Evaluation (10 points),’’ HUD is revising
the first paragraph of this section to read
as follows:
5. Rating Factor 5. Achieving Results
and Program Evaluation (10 points)
This factor emphasizes HUD’s
determination to track whether
applicants meet commitments made in
their applications. HUD requires SHOP
applicants to develop an effective,
quantifiable, outcome-oriented
evaluation plan for measuring
performance and determining whether
goals have been met using the Master
Logic Model for SHOP, which can be
found in the download instructions
portion at https://www.grants.gov/
applicants/apply_for_grants.jsp.
Applicants must clearly identify the
‘‘Outputs’’ and ‘‘Outcomes’’ to be
achieved and measured. Completed
newly constructed or rehabilitated selfhelp housing units are outputs.
E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM
12JNN1
33450
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 114 / Thursday, June 12, 2008 / Notices
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Outcomes are benefits accruing to the
families and/or communities during or
after participation in SHOP. Examples
of outcomes include increasing the
homeownership rate in a neighborhood
or among low-income families by a
certain percentage, increasing the
property tax base by a certain value, or
increasing housing stability (e.g.,
increasing assets of the low-income
homebuyer households by creating
household equity or reducing total
housing costs compared to rents that
SHOP participants previously paid.
When comparing the total housing costs
of new self-help housing units to rents
previously paid by homebuyers,
applicants should include actual or
estimated costs of utilities for the rental
units and any applicable homeowner
association fees and estimated utilities
for the new housing units.) during and
beyond the grantee’s period for
reporting on property completions. See
Reporting in section VI.C. In addition,
applicants must establish interim
benchmarks for which outputs lead to
the ultimate achievement of outcomes.
‘‘Interim benchmarks’’ are steps or
stages in your activities that, if reached
or completed successfully, will result in
outputs for your program. Examples of
interim benchmarks for SHOP include
acquisition of land, completion of
infrastructure, identification of incomequalified homebuyers, obtaining
building permits, or securing
construction materials and equipment.
On page 27258, section V.A.5, third
column entitled ‘‘Submission
Requirements for Rating Factor 5,’’ HUD
is revising this section to read as
follows:
Submission Requirements for Rating
Factor 5
Program Evaluation Plan and Logic
Model (10 Points). The FY 2008
application requires submission of a
written program evaluation plan and a
completed eLogicModel TM. The
eLogicModel TM allows the applicant to
select from drop down menus the
elements of their program that are
captured in the Logic Model.
Instructions for the eLogic Model TM are
found in Tab 1 of the form HUD–96011
found in the instructions download to
your electronic application. The Master
Logic Model listing also identifies the
unit of measure that HUD will collect
for the output(s) and outcome(s)
selected. Applicants must identify a
unit of measure and establish a goal for
each output and outcome.
HUD has designated mandatory
outputs and outcomes that must be
addressed by the applicant. For both
‘‘Housing Constructed’’ and ‘‘Housing
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:47 Jun 11, 2008
Jkt 214001
Rehabilitated,’’ applicants must address
the following five mandatory Outputs:
(1) Sweat Equity (hours); (2) Volunteer
Labor (hours); (3) Design incorporates
energy efficiency measures and Energy
Star Standards (units); (4) Policy
Priority—Design incorporates universal
design (units); and (5) Policy Priority—
Design incorporates visitability
standards (units).
For both ‘‘New construction’’ and
‘‘Rehabilitated units,’’ applicants must
address the following four mandatory
Outcomes: (1) one of the three sets of
‘‘average reduced sales price’’ from 1–10
% (dollars and units) or from 11–30%
(dollars and units) or greater than 30%
(dollars and units)—each set counts as
two outcomes; (2) Increased housing
stability—average decreased housing
costs (dollars); and (3) Increased
housing stability—average increased
assets in savings (dollars).
HUD has revised the eLogic Model TM
form HUD–96011, Tab 9 labeled
‘‘Outcomes,’’ Column 5, Achievement
Outcomes Goals and Indicator. Instead
of ‘‘percentage,’’ the double asterisks
(**) footnote should state: ‘‘This is the
average dollars of reduced housing costs
to the families or increased assets to the
families.’’ HUD is also clarifying that for
the projected outcome ‘‘Increased
housing stability—Average increased
assets in savings,’’ applicants are not
asked to report on homebuyers’ existing
savings. This outcome requires
applicants to measure the equity in the
units at the time properties are
completed and families close on their
units. This equity increases any other
assets in savings homebuyers may have
at the time of closing.
If an applicant’s program consists of
new construction or rehabilitation, but
not both, the five mandatory outputs
and four outcomes applicable to the
program must be selected. If an
applicant’s program includes both new
construction and rehabilitation,
applicant must address all mandatory
outputs/outcomes. However, applicants
are expected to select additional outputs
and outcomes identified in their work
plan. Further, interim benchmarks,
program indicators, outputs, and
outcomes must be quantifiable.
You must summarize your program
evaluation plan that measures your own
program performance. Your plan must
measure the performance of individual
consortium members and affiliates,
including the standards and
measurement methods, and the steps
you have in place or how you plan to
make adjustments if you begin to fall
short of established benchmarks and
time frames. Applicants that include
both mandatory and optional outputs
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and outcomes and interim benchmarks,
and prepare a written evaluation plan
that meets the specified content
requirements will receive a higher score.
HUD will rate the eLogicModel TM
submission based upon the matrix
contained in Attachment 1 to the
General Section.
III. Guidance To Address Grants.gov
SF–424 Issue
The Department has been informed
that applicants have experienced
trouble completing the Application for
Federal Assistance SF–424 electronic
form in the Grants.gov funding
opportunity application package.
Specifically, the Department has been
alerted that if an applicant checks ‘‘No’’
to question number 20 (Is the Applicant
Delinquent On Any Federal Debt?) and
inadvertently places his or her cursor
and clicks on the space on page 4
entitled ‘‘Applicant Federal Debt
Delinquency Explanation,’’ the SF–424
will make the space a mandatory field
that is yellow in color. The SF–424 will
not allow applicants to enter text in the
mandatory field. The reason for this
behavior is that Adobe Reader 8.1.1 and
8.1.2 opens with a default with the Text
Select Tool pointer (which look like a
finger). This default was intended by
Adobe Reader. The issue that this
causes for Grants.gov forms is that the
Text Select Tool, if clicked in a readonly form field will make the field
mandatory without any means to fill in
text or change it back to read only. As
a result, HUD is advising applicants to
avoid placing their cursors in the
explanation space provided on the form
if they check the response to question
20 as ‘‘No.’’
If an applicant inadvertently triggers
the creation of the mandatory field, the
way to clear the form of the problem is
to go back to question 20, click the
‘‘Yes’’ box and then click the ‘‘No’’ box.
This brings the form back to the original
state and eliminates the explanation
field from being a mandatory field. An
alternative way to address the issue is
to go to the menu bar, select ‘‘Tools,’’
select from the drop-down bar ‘‘Select
and Zoom’’ and then select ‘‘Hand
Tool.’’ The Grants.gov help desk has
been alerted to this issue and can help
applicants address this issue.
In addition, applicants are alerted that
the form contains edit checks. To avoid
a rejection notice, please make sure that
dates provided in response to question
17, ‘‘Proposed Project Start and end
date,’’ are internally consistent and that
the project does not end prior to its
proposed start date. If an applicant
mistakenly provides a project end date
that is prior to the start date, the
E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM
12JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 114 / Thursday, June 12, 2008 / Notices
package will be rejected by Grants.gov
due to an internal inconsistency.
HUD again strongly advises
applicants to submit their application to
Grants.gov 72 hours in advance to the
deadline date so that if they receive a
rejection error, there is sufficient time
for the applicant to cure the problem
and resubmit in time to meet the
deadline date requirements.
Dated: June 9, 2008.
Keith A. Nelson,
Assistant Secretary for Administration.
[FR Doc. E8–13285 Filed 6–11–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R4–R–2008–N0087; 40136–1265–
0000–S3]
Wolf Island National Wildlife Refuge,
McIntosh County, GA
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; draft
comprehensive conservation plan and
environmental assessment; request for
comments.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We, the Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service), announce the
availability of a draft comprehensive
conservation plan and environmental
assessment (Draft CCP/EA) for Wolf
Island National Wildlife Refuge for
public review and comment. In this
Draft CCP/EA, we describe the
alternative we propose to use to manage
this refuge for the 15 years following
approval of the Final CCP.
DATES: To ensure consideration, we
must receive your written comments by
July 14, 2008. A meeting will be held to
present the Draft CCP/EA to the public.
Mailings, newspaper articles, and
posters will be the avenues to inform
the public of the date and time for the
meeting.
ADDRESSES: Requests for copies of the
Draft CCP/EA should be addressed to:
Jane Griess, Project Leader, Savannah
Coastal Refuges’ Complex, 1000
Business Center Drive, Suite 10,
Savannah, Georgia 31405; Telephone:
912/652–4415. The Draft CCP/EA may
also be accessed and downloaded from
the Service’s Internet Site: https://
southeast.fws.gov/planning. Comments
on the Draft CCP/EA may be submitted
to the above address or by e-mail to Mr.
Randy Williams at:
rwilliams@mangi.com.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:47 Jun 11, 2008
Jkt 214001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Randy Williams; Telephone: 985/264–
1979.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we continue the CCP
process for Wolf Island National
Wildlife Refuge. We started the process
through a notice in the Federal Register
on October 30, 2006 (71 FR 63344).
Wolf Island National Wildlife Refuge
is approximately 12 miles off the coast
of Darien, Georgia, in McIntosh County.
It was established on April 3, 1930, to
provide protection and habitat for
migratory birds. The barrier island
refuge consists of Wolf Island and two
smaller islands, Egg and Little Egg. More
than 75 percent of the refuge’s 5,126
acres are composed of saltwater marsh.
Wolf Island National Wildlife Refuge
was designated a National Wilderness
Area in 1975, and is maintained as such,
with its primary purpose being to
provide protection for migratory birds
and such threatened and endangered
species as the loggerhead sea turtle and
the piping plover.
Background
The CCP Process
The National Wildlife Refuge System
Improvement Act of 1997 (16 U.S.C.
668dd–668ee), which amended the
National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act of 1966, requires us
to develop a CCP for each national
wildlife refuge. The purpose in
developing a CCP is to provide refuge
managers with a 15-year plan for
achieving refuge purposes and
contributing toward the mission of the
National Wildlife Refuge System,
consistent with sound principles of fish
and wildlife management, conservation,
legal mandates, and our policies. In
addition to outlining broad management
direction on conserving wildlife and
their habitats, CCPs identify wildlifedependent recreational opportunities
available to the public, including
opportunities for hunting, fishing,
wildlife observation, wildlife
photography, and environmental
education and interpretation. We will
review and update the CCP at least
every 15 years in accordance with the
Improvement Act and NEPA.
Significant issues addressed in the
Draft CCP/EA include: threatened and
endangered species; habitat protection;
neotropical migratory birds;
conservation of a remnant maritime
forest; visitor services (e.g., wildlife
observation, wildlife photography, and
environmental education and
interpretation); funding and staffing;
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
33451
cultural resources; land acquisition; and
invasive species management.
CCP Alternatives, Including Our
Proposed Alternative
We developed three alternatives for
managing the refuge and chose
Alternative C as the proposed
alternative. A full description of each
alternative is in the Draft CCP/EA. We
summarize each alternative below.
Alternative A—No Action Alternative
Wolf Island National Wildlife Refuge
is part of the Altamaha River Ecosystem
and is an important part of the Western
Hemisphere Shorebird Reserve
Network. As such, the refuge is of
significant importance to migrating and
wintering shorebirds and has been
designated as part of critical habitat for
the Great Lakes population of the
endangered piping plover. Under
Alternative A, management of the refuge
would continue at its current level of
participation in these initiatives
throughout the 15-year duration of the
CCP. Current approaches to managing
wildlife and habitats, protecting
resources, and disallowing public use
would remain unchanged.
Wolf Island National Wildlife Refuge,
as a designated National Wilderness
Area, provides protection for threatened
and endangered species, including the
loggerhead sea turtle and the piping
plover. Due to its status as a Wilderness
Area, no public use facilities exist or are
planned on the refuge. Although the
waters surrounding the refuge are open
to a variety of recreational activities, all
beach, marsh, and upland areas are
closed to the public. Under this
alternative, none of the above would
change. Current management practices,
which are primarily custodial in nature,
would continue.
Alternative B—Optimize Biological
Program
Under Alternative B, the refuge would
strive to optimize its biological program,
recognizing that there may be tradeoffs
and opportunity costs between the
various elements of the biological
programs envisioned. Alternative B
stresses the principle of optimization
rather than maximization of wildlife
and habitat outputs.
The refuge would conduct baseline
inventorying and monitoring programs
with several partners to provide a solid
foundation of the current condition of
refuge habitat and wildlife. We would
continue to furnish benefits to migratory
birds and resident wildlife species. We
would aim to increase the refuge’s
knowledge base about shorebirds by
developing and implementing
E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM
12JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 114 (Thursday, June 12, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33446-33451]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-13285]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR-5200-C-01A2]
Notice of HUD's Fiscal Year (FY) 2008 General Section and FY2008
SuperNOFA for HUD's Discretionary Grant Programs; Correction
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, HUD.
ACTION: Super Notice of Funding Availability (SuperNOFA) for HUD
Discretionary Grant Programs; correction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On March 19, 2008, HUD published its Notice of Fiscal Year
(FY) 2008 Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA); Policy Requirements
and General Section to HUD's FY2008 NOFAs for Discretionary Programs
(General Section). On May 12, 2008, HUD published its FY2008 SuperNOFA,
for HUD's Discretionary Grant Programs. This document corrects the
hourly rate for consultants as published in the March 19, 2008, General
Section. This document also makes corrections or clarifications to the
following sections of the May 12, 2008, SuperNOFA: Appendix A of the
Introduction to the SuperNOFA, the Lead-Based Paint Hazard Control
Grant Program, Lead Hazard Reduction Demonstration Grant Program, and
Operation Lead Elimination Action Program; the Lead Outreach Grant
Program; the Housing Choice Voucher Family Self-Sufficiency Program;
the Resident Opportunity and Self-Sufficiency (ROSS) Service
Coordinators Program; and the Self-Help Homeownership Opportunity
Program (SHOP). Finally, this notice provides notice to all applicants
regarding a technical issue with the Grants.gov SF-424 form and
provides guidance to address the issue.
DATES: The application submission dates for the Lead-Based Paint Hazard
Control Grant Program, Lead Hazard Reduction Demonstration Grant
Program, and Operation Lead Elimination Action Program NOFA, the Lead
Outreach Grant Program NOFA, and the Resident Opportunity and Self-
Sufficiency (ROSS) Service Coordinators Program NOFA remain as
published in the Federal Register on May 12, 2008. The deadline date
for the Housing Choice Voucher Program has been moved to July 16, 2008.
The deadline date for the Self-Help Homeownership Opportunity Program
(SHOP) has been moved to July 18, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions regarding the General
Section of March 19, 2008, should be directed to the NOFA Information
Center between the hours of 10 a.m. and 6:30 p.m. Eastern Time at (800)
HUD-8929. Hearing-impaired persons may call 800-HUD-2209. For the
programs listed in this notice, please contact the office or individual
listed under section VII of the applicable program sections of the
SuperNOFA, published on May 12, 2008.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 19, 2008 (73 FR 14882), HUD
published its Notice of Fiscal Year (FY) 2008 Notice of Funding
Availability (NOFA); Policy Requirements and General Section to HUD's
FY2008 NOFAs for Discretionary Programs (General Section). Early
publication of the General Section was intended to provide prospective
applicants additional time to become familiar with and address those
provisions in the General Section that constitute part of almost every
application. On May 12, 2008 (73 FR 27032), HUD published its Notice of
HUD's Fiscal Year (FY) 2008 SuperNOFA for HUD's Discretionary Grant
Programs. The FY 2008 SuperNOFA announced the availability of
approximately $1.02 billion in HUD assistance. This notice published in
today's Federal Register corrects the hourly rate for consultants as
published in the March 19, 2008, General Section. This notice also
makes technical corrections to the following sections of the May 12,
2008, SuperNOFA: Appendix A of the Introduction to the SuperNOFA; the
Lead-Based Paint Hazard Control Grant Program, Lead Hazard Reduction
Demonstration Grant Program, and Operation Lead Elimination Action
Program; the Lead Outreach Grant Program; the Housing Choice Voucher
Family Self-Sufficiency Program; the Resident Opportunity and Self-
Sufficiency (ROSS) Service Coordinators Program; and the Self-Help
Homeownership Opportunity Program (SHOP). This notice also provides
notice to all applicants regarding a technical issue with the
Grants.gov SF-424 form in the funding opportunity Application Package
and provides guidance to address the issue.
I. Correction of General Section
On March 19, 2008 (73 FR 14882), HUD published its General Section.
At page 14887, section III.C.4.l., second column, HUD stated that the
hourly wage for the equivalent of General Schedule 15, Step 10 base pay
rate is $57.90. The correct hourly rate for the equivalent of General
Schedule 15, Step 10 base pay rate is actually $59.42.
Accordingly, at page 14887, section III.C.4.l., second column, in
the March
[[Page 33447]]
19, 2008, Notice of HUD's FY2008, Notice of Funding Availability
(NOFA), Policy Requirements and General Section to the SuperNOFA for
HUD's Discretionary Grant Programs, the following correction is made:
1. Salary Limitation for Consultants. FY2008 funds may not be used
to pay or to provide reimbursement for payment of the salary of a
consultant, whether retained by the federal government or the grantee,
at a rate more than the equivalent of General Schedule 15, Step 10 base
pay rate for which the annual rate for FY2008 is $124,010. The hourly
rate is $59.42.
II. Summary of Technical Corrections
On May 12, 2008, HUD published its FY2008 SuperNOFA. Today's
publication corrects certain sections of the SuperNOFA. Summaries of
the technical corrections made by this document follow. The page number
shown in brackets identifies where the individual funding availability
announcement that is being corrected can be found in the May 12, 2008,
SuperNOFA. The technical correction described in today's Federal
Register will also be reflected in the application instructions located
on Grants.gov/Apply. Applicants who have submitted their applications
prior to this publication can choose to resubmit an updated application
that reflects the corrections and clarifications. The last application
received and validated by Grants.gov by the deadline date will be the
application that is reviewed and rated.
Introduction to the SuperNOFA--Appendix A [27035]
As discussed in this technical correction notice, HUD is moving the
application deadline dates for the Housing Choice Voucher Family Self-
Sufficiency and SHOP NOFAs. The new deadline date for the Housing
Choice Voucher Family Self-Sufficiency NOFA will be July 16, 2008. The
new deadline date for the SHOP NOFA will be July 18, 2008. HUD is,
therefore, correcting the entries for the Housing Choice Voucher Family
Self-Sufficiency Program and the SHOP NOFAs on Appendix A to reflect
these changes.
Lead-Based Paint Hazard Control Grant Program, Lead Hazard Reduction
Demonstration Grant Program, and Operation Lead Elimination Action
Program [27159]
On page 27161, Section I.B.4., first column, and on page 27168,
Section IV.F.2, first column, the deadline date for applicants to
request a waiver of the 25 percent match requirement does not match the
date posted on Grants.gov. HUD is correcting the deadline date to
request a waiver in the SuperNOFA to match that listed on Grants.gov.
Lead Outreach Grant Program [27188]
On page 27189, Section II entitled ``Eligibility Information'',
third column, HUD inadvertently identified this section as section
``II.'' It should be section ``III.''
On page 27190, section III entitled ``application and submission
information'', second column, HUD inadvertently identified this section
as section ``iii.'' it should be section ``iv.''
On page 27191, section v.a, third column, HUD incorrectly cross-
referenced to information discussing threshold requirements and is
deleting the incorrect cross-reference.
On page 27193, section V.A.3.e.(3), second column, HUD is
correcting the requirement for including a separate budget and budget
narrative when sub-grantees receive a portion of the award.
These corrections are also reflected in the instructions found on
Grants.gov/Apply. Applicants must download the instructions to receive
all forms and instructions related to this NOFA. Applicants are
encouraged to read the instructions on Grants.gov/Apply prior to
submitting your application in response to the Lead Outreach Program
funding opportunity.
Housing Choice Voucher Family Self-Sufficiency (FSS) Program [27210]
On page 27211, paragraph F under ``Overview Information'', first
column, as discussed in this notice, HUD is moving the deadline date
for applications to July 16, 2008.
On page 27213, section III.C.3.g. entitled ``Affirmatively
Furthering Fair Housing'', HUD is revising the timeline for applicants
to submit their plans to affirmatively further fair housing (AFFH).
Specifically, HUD is changing the date for applicants to submit this
plan from prior to the application date to prior to the award of
funding. This extension is required because implementation of an AFFH
policy for the FSS program trigger a 45-day public comment period for
the proposed AFFH policy followed by board approval of the policy prior
to submission to HUD. The original application deadline did not allow
sufficient time for PHAs to complete the steps required for approval
and submission of their AFFH statements.
These corrections are also reflected in the instructions found on
Grants.gov/Apply. Applicants must download the instructions to receive
all forms and instructions related to this NOFA. Applicants are
encouraged to read the instructions on Grants.gov/Apply prior to
submitting your application in response to the Housing Choice Voucher
Family Self-Sufficiency Program funding opportunity
Resident Opportunity and Self-Sufficiency Coordinators Program [27230]
On page 27230, section I.B.1, third column, HUD is clarifying for
applicants how the number of occupied units should be counted in order
to determine the number of positions for which an applicant may apply.
On page 27232, section II.C.1.a., third column, HUD is noting that
more than one person may job-share a Service Coordinator position.
On page 27239, section V.B.2., first column, entitled ``Selection
Process for all Grant Categories and All Applicants,'' HUD is
clarifying that all Resident Association applicants, even those that
apply as nonprofits, must have a contract administrator.
These corrections are also reflected in the instructions found on
Grants.gov/Apply. Applicants must download the instructions to receive
all forms and instructions related to this NOFA. Applicants are
encouraged to read the instructions on Grants.gov/Apply prior to
submitting your application in response to the Resident Opportunity and
Self-Sufficiency Coordinators Program funding opportunity.
Self-Help Homeownership Opportunity Program [27250]
On page 27250, section F under ``Overview Information,'' first
column, HUD is moving the deadline date for the SHOP NOFA to July 18,
2008.
On page 27253, section III.C.4.e., first column, HUD is clarifying
the requirement for applicants to reduce energy costs.
On page 27254, section VI.C., second column entitled, ``Submission
Date and Time,'' HUD is moving the deadline date for the SHOP NOFA to
July 18, 2008.
On page 27256, under ``Submission Requirements for Rating Factor
3,'' section d., third column entitled ``Cost Effective to the
Homebuyer,'' HUD is clarifying the requirement for applicants to
disclose the contract sales price to the homebuyer and the appraised or
market value of the home.
On page 27258, section V.A.5, second column entitled, ``Rating
Factor 5. Achieving Result and Program Evaluation (10 points),'' HUD is
clarifying that applicants should include actual or estimated costs for
utilities and any applicable
[[Page 33448]]
homeownership association fee when comparing total housing costs of new
self-help units to previous rents.
On page 27258, section V.A.5, third column entitled ``Submission
Requirements for Rating Factor 5,'' HUD is revising this section to
advises applicants that HUD has developed and posted on Grants.gov a
revised eLogic Model form that incorporates the revision to Rating
Factor 5 that instructs applicants to include actual or estimated
utility and other costs. HUD encourages applicants to download and use
the revised eLogic Model.
These corrections are also reflected in the instructions found on
Grants.gov/Apply. Applicants must download the instructions to receive
all forms and instructions related to this NOFA. Applicants are
encouraged to read the instructions on Grants.gov/Apply prior to
submitting your application in response to the Self-Help Homeownership
Opportunity Program funding opportunity.
Accordingly, in the May 12, 2008, Notice of HUD's FY2008 SuperNOFA
for HUD's Discretionary Grant Programs, beginning at 73 FR 27032, the
following corrections are made.
1. Introduction to the SuperNOFA--Appendix A Beginning at Page 27035
At page 27035, as discussed in this notice, HUD is moving the
deadline date for the Housing Choice Voucher Family Self-Sufficiency
Program to July 16, 2008. HUD is also moving the deadline date for the
SHOP NOFA to July 18, 2008. As a result, the entries for the Housing
Choice Voucher Family Self-Sufficiency Program and SHOP NOFA on
Appendix A at page 27035 should read as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Application deadline (All
applications must be received and
validated by Grants.gov no later
Programs included in the FY2008 SuperNOFA Approximate funding amounts than 11:59:59 p.m., eastern time
available on the application deadline date.
See details in the General
Section.)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Housing Choice Voucher Family Self-Sufficiency $49,000,000 July 16, 2008.
(FSS) Program.
CFDA No: 14,871
OMB Approval No.: 2577-0178
Self-Help Homeownership Opportunity Program 26,500,000 July 18, 2008.
(SHOP).
CFDA No: 14,247
OMB Approval No.: 2506-0157
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Lead-Based Paint Hazard Control Grant Program, Lead Hazard Reduction
Demonstration Grant Program, and Operation Lead Elimination Action
Program [27159]
On page 27161, Section I.B.4., first column, HUD is correcting this
section to read as follows:
4. Applicants to the LHRD grant program may request a waiver of the
25 percent match requirement, if the applicant submits a request that
meets HUD's criteria. See unit III.B.2, Eligibility Information, below.
The request for the waiver of the match, with supporting narrative and
documentation, must be submitted in accordance with unit IV.F.2, below,
to be received no later than June 23, 2008.
On page 27168, section IV.F.2, first column, HUD is correcting this
section to read as follows:
2. Lead Hazard Reduction Demonstration Grant Program match waiver.
Lead Hazard Reduction Demonstration Grant Program applicants requesting
a waiver from the 25 percent match requirement are required to submit a
request by e-mail. LHRD match waiver requests must be submitted no
later than 11:59 pm on June 23, 2008, and should be submitted to
Jonnette Hawkins, Director, Programs Division, Office of Healthy Homes
and Lead Hazard Control, at Jonnette.G.Hawkins@hud.gov. HUD will
respond to the LHRD match waiver requests by e-mail no later than July
2, 2008, and, if a mailing address is provided in a request, by letter
within 5 working days thereafter.
3. Lead Outreach Grant Program Beginning at Page 27188
On page 27189, Section II entitled ``Eligibility Information'',
third column, is corrected to read as follows:
III. Eligibility Information
On page 27190, section III entitled ``Application and Submission
Information'', second column, is corrected to read as follows:
IV. Application and Submission Information
On page 27191, section V.A, third column, HUD is correcting this
paragraph to read as follows:
A. Criteria. Applications that meet all of the threshold
requirements will be eligible to be scored and ranked, based on the
total number of points allocated for each of the rating factors
described in this NOFA. The application must receive a total score of
at least 75 points to be considered for funding.
On page 27193, section V.A.3.e.(3), second column, HUD is
correcting this section to read as follows:
(3) Include a separate budget (HUD-424-CBW) and budget narrative
for any sub-grantee receiving more than 10 percent of total budget
request.
4. Housing Choice Voucher Family Self-Sufficiency (FSS) Program
beginning at page 27210
On page 27211, paragraph F under ``Overview Information'', first
column, is corrected to read as follows:
F. Dates: The application deadline date is July 16, 2008. Please
see the General Section for timely receipt requirements.
On page 27213, section III.C.3.g. entitled ``Affirmatively
Furthering Fair Housing,'' HUD is revising the second sentence of this
paragraph to read as follows:
Prior to the award of funding under this NOFA, each applicant must
submit to the public housing director in the applicant's local HUD
field office an addendum to the applicant's HCV administrative plan
that outlines reasonable steps the applicant will take to affirmatively
further fair housing in its HCV FSS program and how it will maintain
records of those steps and their impacts.
5. Resident Opportunity and Self-Sufficiency Coordinators Program
Beginning at Page 27230
On page 27230, section I.B.1, third column, HUD is correcting this
paragraph to read as follows:
1. For PHA and Tribe/TDHE applicants, the number of positions is
determined by number of ACC units. PHAs must use the number of occupied
[[Page 33449]]
conventional public housing units as of September 30, 2007. Tribes/
TDHEs must use the number of units counted as Formula Current Assisted
Stock for FY 2007 as defined in 24 CFR 1000.316. Tribes that have not
previously received funds from the Department under the U.S. Housing
Act of 1937 should count housing units under management that are owned
and operated by the Tribe and that are identified in their housing
inventory as of September 30, 2007. Applicants may apply for up to 3
Service Coordinators depending on the size and type of the applicant.
Program ratio for number of eligible Service Coordinators is in the
table above under ``Award Amounts.''
On page 27232, section II.C.1.a., third column, correcting this
section to read as follows:
a. Salaries and fringe benefits of one or more Service
Coordinators. A part-time Service Coordinator may be retained where
appropriate, however, the minimum units served remains the same. One or
more PHAs may share a full-time position if that is deemed most
appropriate for the applicant's program. More than one person may job-
share a Service Coordinator position. Although the exact role for the
SC shall be designed to meet the needs of the project's community,
below is a listing of recommended functions for an SC:
On page 27239, section V.B.2., first column, entitled ``Selection
Process for all Grant Categories and All Applicants, HUD is correcting
this section to read as follows:
2. Selection Process for All Grant Categories and All Applicants.
All qualified applications will be awarded based on a lottery. Per
statute, twenty-five percent (25%) of funds will be set aside for
Resident Associations and all qualifying Resident Association
applications will be funded first, up to 25 percent of the funding
amount. Even if applying as non-profits, state, national, and other
incorporated non-profit Resident Associations will be included in this
set-aside. To be included in this Resident Association Category, you
must indicate your status on the HUD-52768. If an applicant indicates
that they are a resident council for the purposes of this lottery
designation, they must also supply a contract administrator partner
agreement, even if applying as a nonprofit applicant. If there are more
qualified resident organizations than 25% of the available funding,
there will be an initial lottery for all resident organizations, then
the remaining resident organizations will be put together with the rest
of the qualified applicants for a second general lottery.
6. Self-Help Homeownership Opportunity Program Beginning at Page 27250
On page 27250, section F under ``Overview Information,'' first
column, HUD is moving the deadline date for the SHOP NOFA to July 18,
2008, therefore, this section is corrected to read as follows:
F. Dates: The application deadline date for electronic submission
and validation in Grants.gov is July 18, 2008. Applications submitted
through https://www.grants.gov must be received and validated by
Grants.gov no later than 11:59:59 Eastern time on the application
deadline date. The validation process may take up to 72 hours.
On page 27253, section III.C.4.e., first column, HUD is clarifying
the requirement for applicants to reduce energy cost to read as
follows.
e. Reduce Energy Costs. Applicants are required to take specific
energy-saving actions. In the new construction of self-help housing,
SHOP applicants must incorporate energy-efficiency measures in the
design and construction of self-help housing units. All newly
constructed units assisted with SHOP funds provided under this NOFA
must qualify and receive Energy Star Certification by an independent
Home Energy Rater (HER) upon completions and only Energy Star labeled
products and appliances may be used in these units.
On page 27254, section VI.C., second column entitled, ``Submission
Date and Time,'' HUD is moving the deadline date for the SHOP NOFA to
July 18, 2008, therefore, this section is corrected to read as follows:
C. Submission Date and Time
The electronic application must be received and validated no later
than 11:59:59 p.m. Eastern time by Grants.gov on the application
deadline date, which is July 18, 2008. The validation process may take
24-48 hours. Applicants are advised to submit applications 72 hours in
advance. By doing so, if your application fails validation and
Grants.gov rejects the application, you have time to correct the noted
problems prior to the deadline date. If an applicant is granted a
waiver to the electronic application submission requirement, the
application must be received at HUD Headquarters by the application
deadline date (see General Section).
On page 27256, under ``Submission Requirements for Rating Factor
3,'' section d., third column entitled ``Cost Effective to the
Homebuyer,'' HUD is clarifying the requirement for applicants to
disclose the contract sales price to the homebuyer and the appraised or
market value of the home to read as follows:
d. Cost Effective to the Homebuyer (7 points). State how the sales
price for SHOP-assisted units is established (provide a table outlining
separate costs for land purchase and infrastructure improvements paid
by the affiliate; land and infrastructure improvements charged to the
homebuyer; construction and project-related soft costs, such as
architectural, engineering and related professional services; and any
other costs charged to the homebuyer including 2nd or additional
mortgages that must be repaid by the homebuyer upon sale of the
property). You must include in the table the contract sales price to
the homebuyer and the appraised or market value. You must demonstrate
the extent to which the investment of SHOP funds, the contribution of
sweat equity and volunteer labor, donations (e.g., land or building
materials), in-kind contributions, and financing subsidies, further
reduce the sales price to the homebuyer below the appraised value of
the house or market value of comparable housing in the neighborhood.
This must be demonstrated for homebuyers receiving both USDA and non-
USDA construction assistance. Applicants showing a larger reduction of
the sales price to the homebuyer from the appraised or market value as
a result of the use of the SHOP funds for costs that are not charged to
the homebuyer, the SHOP homebuyer's sweat equity, volunteer labor, and
other contributions and subsidies not repaid by the homebuyer will
receive a higher score.
On page 27258, section V.A.5, second column entitled, ``Rating
Factor 5. Achieving Result and Program Evaluation (10 points),'' HUD is
revising the first paragraph of this section to read as follows:
5. Rating Factor 5. Achieving Results and Program Evaluation (10
points)
This factor emphasizes HUD's determination to track whether
applicants meet commitments made in their applications. HUD requires
SHOP applicants to develop an effective, quantifiable, outcome-oriented
evaluation plan for measuring performance and determining whether goals
have been met using the Master Logic Model for SHOP, which can be found
in the download instructions portion at https://www.grants.gov/
applicants/apply_for_grants.jsp. Applicants must clearly identify the
``Outputs'' and ``Outcomes'' to be achieved and measured. Completed
newly constructed or rehabilitated self-help housing units are outputs.
[[Page 33450]]
Outcomes are benefits accruing to the families and/or communities
during or after participation in SHOP. Examples of outcomes include
increasing the homeownership rate in a neighborhood or among low-income
families by a certain percentage, increasing the property tax base by a
certain value, or increasing housing stability (e.g., increasing assets
of the low-income homebuyer households by creating household equity or
reducing total housing costs compared to rents that SHOP participants
previously paid. When comparing the total housing costs of new self-
help housing units to rents previously paid by homebuyers, applicants
should include actual or estimated costs of utilities for the rental
units and any applicable homeowner association fees and estimated
utilities for the new housing units.) during and beyond the grantee's
period for reporting on property completions. See Reporting in section
VI.C. In addition, applicants must establish interim benchmarks for
which outputs lead to the ultimate achievement of outcomes. ``Interim
benchmarks'' are steps or stages in your activities that, if reached or
completed successfully, will result in outputs for your program.
Examples of interim benchmarks for SHOP include acquisition of land,
completion of infrastructure, identification of income-qualified
homebuyers, obtaining building permits, or securing construction
materials and equipment.
On page 27258, section V.A.5, third column entitled ``Submission
Requirements for Rating Factor 5,'' HUD is revising this section to
read as follows:
Submission Requirements for Rating Factor 5
Program Evaluation Plan and Logic Model (10 Points). The FY 2008
application requires submission of a written program evaluation plan
and a completed eLogicModel \TM\. The eLogicModel \TM\ allows the
applicant to select from drop down menus the elements of their program
that are captured in the Logic Model. Instructions for the eLogic Model
\TM\ are found in Tab 1 of the form HUD-96011 found in the instructions
download to your electronic application. The Master Logic Model listing
also identifies the unit of measure that HUD will collect for the
output(s) and outcome(s) selected. Applicants must identify a unit of
measure and establish a goal for each output and outcome.
HUD has designated mandatory outputs and outcomes that must be
addressed by the applicant. For both ``Housing Constructed'' and
``Housing Rehabilitated,'' applicants must address the following five
mandatory Outputs: (1) Sweat Equity (hours); (2) Volunteer Labor
(hours); (3) Design incorporates energy efficiency measures and Energy
Star Standards (units); (4) Policy Priority--Design incorporates
universal design (units); and (5) Policy Priority--Design incorporates
visitability standards (units).
For both ``New construction'' and ``Rehabilitated units,''
applicants must address the following four mandatory Outcomes: (1) one
of the three sets of ``average reduced sales price'' from 1-10 %
(dollars and units) or from 11-30% (dollars and units) or greater than
30% (dollars and units)--each set counts as two outcomes; (2) Increased
housing stability--average decreased housing costs (dollars); and (3)
Increased housing stability--average increased assets in savings
(dollars).
HUD has revised the eLogic Model \TM\ form HUD-96011, Tab 9 labeled
``Outcomes,'' Column 5, Achievement Outcomes Goals and Indicator.
Instead of ``percentage,'' the double asterisks (**) footnote should
state: ``This is the average dollars of reduced housing costs to the
families or increased assets to the families.'' HUD is also clarifying
that for the projected outcome ``Increased housing stability--Average
increased assets in savings,'' applicants are not asked to report on
homebuyers' existing savings. This outcome requires applicants to
measure the equity in the units at the time properties are completed
and families close on their units. This equity increases any other
assets in savings homebuyers may have at the time of closing.
If an applicant's program consists of new construction or
rehabilitation, but not both, the five mandatory outputs and four
outcomes applicable to the program must be selected. If an applicant's
program includes both new construction and rehabilitation, applicant
must address all mandatory outputs/outcomes. However, applicants are
expected to select additional outputs and outcomes identified in their
work plan. Further, interim benchmarks, program indicators, outputs,
and outcomes must be quantifiable.
You must summarize your program evaluation plan that measures your
own program performance. Your plan must measure the performance of
individual consortium members and affiliates, including the standards
and measurement methods, and the steps you have in place or how you
plan to make adjustments if you begin to fall short of established
benchmarks and time frames. Applicants that include both mandatory and
optional outputs and outcomes and interim benchmarks, and prepare a
written evaluation plan that meets the specified content requirements
will receive a higher score. HUD will rate the eLogicModel \TM\
submission based upon the matrix contained in Attachment 1 to the
General Section.
III. Guidance To Address Grants.gov SF-424 Issue
The Department has been informed that applicants have experienced
trouble completing the Application for Federal Assistance SF-424
electronic form in the Grants.gov funding opportunity application
package. Specifically, the Department has been alerted that if an
applicant checks ``No'' to question number 20 (Is the Applicant
Delinquent On Any Federal Debt?) and inadvertently places his or her
cursor and clicks on the space on page 4 entitled ``Applicant Federal
Debt Delinquency Explanation,'' the SF-424 will make the space a
mandatory field that is yellow in color. The SF-424 will not allow
applicants to enter text in the mandatory field. The reason for this
behavior is that Adobe Reader 8.1.1 and 8.1.2 opens with a default with
the Text Select Tool pointer (which look like a finger). This default
was intended by Adobe Reader. The issue that this causes for Grants.gov
forms is that the Text Select Tool, if clicked in a read-only form
field will make the field mandatory without any means to fill in text
or change it back to read only. As a result, HUD is advising applicants
to avoid placing their cursors in the explanation space provided on the
form if they check the response to question 20 as ``No.''
If an applicant inadvertently triggers the creation of the
mandatory field, the way to clear the form of the problem is to go back
to question 20, click the ``Yes'' box and then click the ``No'' box.
This brings the form back to the original state and eliminates the
explanation field from being a mandatory field. An alternative way to
address the issue is to go to the menu bar, select ``Tools,'' select
from the drop-down bar ``Select and Zoom'' and then select ``Hand
Tool.'' The Grants.gov help desk has been alerted to this issue and can
help applicants address this issue.
In addition, applicants are alerted that the form contains edit
checks. To avoid a rejection notice, please make sure that dates
provided in response to question 17, ``Proposed Project Start and end
date,'' are internally consistent and that the project does not end
prior to its proposed start date. If an applicant mistakenly provides a
project end date that is prior to the start date, the
[[Page 33451]]
package will be rejected by Grants.gov due to an internal
inconsistency.
HUD again strongly advises applicants to submit their application
to Grants.gov 72 hours in advance to the deadline date so that if they
receive a rejection error, there is sufficient time for the applicant
to cure the problem and resubmit in time to meet the deadline date
requirements.
Dated: June 9, 2008.
Keith A. Nelson,
Assistant Secretary for Administration.
[FR Doc. E8-13285 Filed 6-11-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P