Global Plus Postal Contracts, 33465-33466 [E8-13161]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 114 / Thursday, June 12, 2008 / Notices
documents. The ADAMS accession
numbers for the documents related to
this notice are: License Renewal
Application dated January 30, 2008
(ML081280084) and the acceptance
review letter dated April 24, 2008
(ML081200183). If you do not have
access to ADAMS or if there are
problems in accessing the documents
located in ADAMS, contact the NRC
Public Document Room (PDR) Reference
staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737
or by e-mail to pdr.resource@nrc.gov.
These documents may also be viewed
electronically on the public computers
located at the NRC’s PDR, O 1 F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, MD 20852. The PDR
reproduction contractor will copy
documents for a fee.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 30th day
of May 2008.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Ronald A. Burrows,
Project Manager, Licensing Branch, Division
of Spent Fuel Storage and Transportation,
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and
Safeguards.
[FR Doc. E8–13198 Filed 6–11–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Final Regulatory Guide: Issuance,
Availability
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Issuance, Availability of
Regulatory Guide 4.21.
AGENCY:
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Edward O’Donnell, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001, telephone (301) 415–
6265 or e-mail to
Edward.ODonnell@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
is issuing a new regulatory guide, RG
4.21, ‘‘Minimization of Contamination
and Radioactive Waste Generation: LifeCycle Planning.’’ The NRC’s regulatory
guides describe and make available to
the public information such as methods
that are acceptable to the NRC staff for
implementing specific parts of the
agency’s regulations, techniques that the
staff uses in evaluating specific
problems or postulated accidents, and
data that the staff needs in its review of
applications for permits and licenses.
This guide describes a method that
the staff of the NRC considers
acceptable for use in implementation of
Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 20.1406 (10 CFR
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:47 Jun 11, 2008
Jkt 214001
20.1406), ‘‘Minimization of
Contamination.’’ Section 20.1406
requires applicants for licenses, design
certification, approval of standard
designs, and manufacturing licenses
under 10 CFR Part 52, ‘‘Early Site
Permits; Standard Design Certifications;
and Combined Licenses for Nuclear
Power Plants,’’ to submit information
with regard to design and operational
procedures for (1) minimizing
radioactive waste generation,
contamination of the facility and the
environment, and (2) facilitating
decommissioning.
In July 2007, the NRC published a
draft of this guide as DG–4012. The
public comment period closed on
November 1, 2007. The staff’s responses
to the public comments are located in
the NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS), Accession Number
ML080700256.
Electronic copies of RG 4.21 are
available through the NRC’s public Web
site under ‘‘Regulatory Guides’’ at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/.
In addition, regulatory guides are
available for inspection at the NRC’s
Public Document Room (PDR), which is
located at 11555 Rockville Pike,
Rockville, Maryland. The PDR’s mailing
address is USNRC PDR, Washington, DC
20555–0001. The PDR can also be
reached by telephone at (301) 415–4737
or (800) 397–4209, by fax at (301) 415–
3548, and by e-mail to PDR@nrc.gov.
Regulatory guides are not
copyrighted, and NRC approval is not
required to reproduce them.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 5th day
of June, 2008.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Makuteswara Srinivasan,
Regulatory Guide Development Branch,
Division of Engineering, Office of Nuclear
Regulatory Research.
[FR Doc. E8–13217 Filed 6–11–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. CP2008–8, CP2008–9 and
CP2008–10; Order No. 81]
Global Plus Postal Contracts
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This document announces the
filing of three Postal Service notices
regarding Global Plus contracts and
related Commission review. Publication
of this document satisfies procedural
requirements. It also allows interested
persons an opportunity to comment.
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
33465
Postal Service filings are due
June 13, 2008. Public comments are due
June 19, 2008.
DATES:
Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
202–789–6820 and
stephen.sharfman@prc.gov.
On June 2,
2008, the Postal Service filed three
notices, which have been assigned to
Docket Nos. CP2008–8, CP2008–9 and
CP2008–10, announcing prices and
classification changes for competitive
products not of general applicability.
The notice in Docket No. CP2008–8
informs the Commission that ‘‘the
Governors have established prices and
classifications for competitive products
not of general applicability for Global
Plus Contracts.’’ 1 The Postal Service
attached a revision of the draft Mail
Classification Schedule (MCS) (section
2610.5) concerning Global Plus
contracts to the Notice.2 Docket No.
CP2008–8 has been filed pursuant to 39
U.S.C. 3632(b)(3) and 39 CFR 3015.5
and 3020.90. In support of this docket,
the Postal Service has also filed
materials under seal, including the
Governors’ decision. The Postal Service
claims that ‘‘[c]ontract prices are highly
confidential in the business world
* * * [and that its] ability * * * to
negotiate individual contracts would be
severely compromised if prices for these
types of agreements were publicly
disclosed.’’ Notice at 1–2.
The notices in Docket Nos. CP2008–
9 and CP2008–10 announce individual
negotiated service agreements, namely,
specific Global Plus contracts that the
Postal Service has entered into with
individual mailers.3 In support of these
dockets, the Postal Service has also filed
materials, including the contracts and
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1 Notice of United States Postal Service of
Governors’ Decision Establishing Prices and
Classifications for Global Plus Contracts, June 2,
2008, at 1 (Notice).
2 The draft MCS remains under review. The
Commission anticipates providing interested
persons an opportunity to comment on the draft
MCS in the near future. Modifications to the MCS,
such as proposed in Docket No. CP2008–8, should,
in the future, be filed in the dockets designated by
the ‘‘MC’’ prefix. Contracts executed pursuant to
those requested classifications are appropriately
filed as ‘‘CP’’ dockets.
3 Docket No. CP2008–9, Notice of United States
Postal Service Filing of a Global Plus Contract, June
2, 2008 (Docket No. CP2008–9 Pricing Notice);
Docket No. CP2008–10, Notice of United States
Postal Service of Filing a Global Plus Contract, June
2, 2008 (Docket No. CP2008–10 Pricing Notice).
E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM
12JNN1
33466
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 114 / Thursday, June 12, 2008 / Notices
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
supporting materials, under seal.4 The
Postal Service asserts that ‘‘[t]he names
of customers who enter into respective
contracts and the related contract prices
are highly confidential business
information.’’ Docket No. CP2008–9
Pricing Notice at 1; Docket No. CP2008–
10 Pricing Notice at 1.
The Postal Service’s filings in these
dockets are related. Docket No. CP2008–
8 establishes, in essence, a shell
classification, while Docket Nos.
CP2008–9 and CP2008–10 are specific
agreements negotiated pursuant to the
conditions of the shell classification.
Given this interrelationship, the
Commission reviews these proceedings
together in this order.5
In Order No. 43, the Commission
issued regulations establishing a
modern system of rate regulation,
including a list of competitive products.
PRC Order No. 43, October 29, 2007,
3061, 4013. Among other things, the
Commission determined that each
negotiated service agreement would
initially be classified as a separate
product. The Commission also
acknowledged, however, the possibility
of grouping functionally equivalent
agreements as a single product if they
exhibit similar cost and market
characteristics. Id. 2177 and 3001. In its
filings, the Postal Service does not
contend or provide support for the
proposition that these two agreements
are premised on similar cost and market
characteristics. Thus, the specific Global
Plus agreements filed in Docket Nos.
CP2008–9 and CP2008–10 will be
classified as new products.
As noted above, the Postal Service
filed all three above-captioned dockets
pursuant to 39 CFR 3015.5.6
Recognizing that the Postal Service’s
filings in these proceedings represent a
series of recent filings involving
competitive rates not of general
applicability under 39 U.S.C. 3632(b)(3),
the Commission will proceed as if the
Global Plus negotiated service
agreements also had been filed pursuant
4 The Postal Service’s filings under seal did not
comply with the Commission’s procedural rules.
The Postal Service is reminded that a cover sheet
must be attached to all documents being filed under
seal. The cover sheet must contain the caption and
title pursuant to 39 CFR 3001.11(a). Consistent with
previous practice, documents filed under seal
should contain a statement similar to the following:
‘‘CONFIDENTIAL—DOCUMENT FILED UNDER
SEAL.’’ See, e.g., Docket No. MC2005–3, P.O.
Ruling MC2005–3/2, at Attachment para. 10.
5 While this order treats these proceedings
together due to their interrelated nature, future
filings should be made in the docket related to the
issues being addressed.
6 Docket No. CP2008–8 was also filed pursuant to
39 CFR 3020.90.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:47 Jun 11, 2008
Jkt 214001
to 39 CFR part 3020, subpart B.7 As a
consequence, the Commission will also
review the dockets pursuant to 39 CFR
3020.34. Because the Commission in its
own discretion will review these
dockets under 39 CFR 3020.34, the
Postal Service may, if it wishes to do so,
supplement the materials already filed
with the Commission.8
In addition, the Commission directs
the Postal Service to identify and list
any contracts currently in existence
(and their respective expiration dates)
that would no longer qualify as Global
Plus contracts under proposed revised
section 2610.5 to the draft MCS attached
to the Notice in Docket No. CP2008–8.
The Commission also directs the Postal
Service to provide a detailed
justification for why it believes that
Global Plus contracts’ expiration dates
(without disclosing the identity of the
customers) should not be made publicly
available. The Postal Service must also
address the reasons why the entire
Governors’ decision is considered to be
highly confidential or otherwise entitled
to be filed under seal.
Under the negotiated service
agreements at issue, mailers would pay
discounted rates prior to necessary
regulatory approval for such rates
subject to subsequent collection of the
full rate if regulatory approval is not
obtained. The Postal Accountability and
Enhancement Act does not appear to
contemplate this arrangement for new
products. See 39 U.S.C. 3642(e). The
Postal Service should address this issue
in its comments.
Answers to the Commission’s
questions and any supplemental
materials that the Postal Service plans to
provide are due no later than June 13,
2008.
Interested persons may express views
and offer comments on whether the
planned changes are consistent with the
policies of 39 U.S.C. 3632, 3633, or
3642. Comments are due no later than
June 19, 2008.
Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Paul L.
Harrington is appointed to serve as
officer of the Commission (Public
Representative) to represent the
interests of the general public in the
above-captioned dockets.
It is ordered:
1. Responses to the Commission’s
questions set forth in the body of this
7 In Order Nos. 78 and 79, the Commission
provided guidance on the filing procedures that
should be used for such filings in the future. See
PRC Order No. 78 at 3, n.6.
8 The Commission characterizes the Governors’
decision and associated materials filed in Docket
No. CP2008–8 as material that supports the specific
negotiated service agreements filed in Docket Nos.
CP2008–9 and CP2008–10.
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
order and any supplemental materials
that the Postal Service wishes to provide
are due no later than June 13, 2008.
2. Comments by interested persons on
issues in these proceedings are due no
later than June 19, 2008.
3. The Commission appoints Paul L.
Harrington as Public Representative to
represent the interests of the general
public in these proceedings.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for
publication of this order in the Federal
Register.
By the Commission.
Steven W. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–13161 Filed 6–11–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[File No. 500–1]
In the Matter of: Struthers, Inc. (n/k/a
Global Marine, Ltd.), Sun Vacation
Properties Corp., and Sunshine Mining
& Refining Co.,; Order of Suspension
of Trading
June 10, 2008.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of Struthers,
Inc. (n/k/a Global Marine Ltd.) because
it has not filed any periodic reports
since the period ended September 30,
2001.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of Sun
Vacation Properties Corp. because it has
not filed any periodic reports since the
period ended December 31, 2003.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of Sunshine
Mining & Refining Co. because it has not
filed any periodic reports since
September 30, 2001.
The Commission is of the opinion that
the public interest and the protection of
investors require a suspension of trading
in the securities of the above-listed
companies.
Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to
section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, that trading in the abovelisted companies is suspended for the
period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on June 10,
2008, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on June
23, 2008.
E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM
12JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 114 (Thursday, June 12, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33465-33466]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-13161]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. CP2008-8, CP2008-9 and CP2008-10; Order No. 81]
Global Plus Postal Contracts
AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document announces the filing of three Postal Service
notices regarding Global Plus contracts and related Commission review.
Publication of this document satisfies procedural requirements. It also
allows interested persons an opportunity to comment.
DATES: Postal Service filings are due June 13, 2008. Public comments
are due June 19, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments electronically via the Commission's Filing
Online system at https://www.prc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
202-789-6820 and stephen.sharfman@prc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 2, 2008, the Postal Service filed
three notices, which have been assigned to Docket Nos. CP2008-8,
CP2008-9 and CP2008-10, announcing prices and classification changes
for competitive products not of general applicability. The notice in
Docket No. CP2008-8 informs the Commission that ``the Governors have
established prices and classifications for competitive products not of
general applicability for Global Plus Contracts.'' \1\ The Postal
Service attached a revision of the draft Mail Classification Schedule
(MCS) (section 2610.5) concerning Global Plus contracts to the
Notice.\2\ Docket No. CP2008-8 has been filed pursuant to 39 U.S.C.
3632(b)(3) and 39 CFR 3015.5 and 3020.90. In support of this docket,
the Postal Service has also filed materials under seal, including the
Governors' decision. The Postal Service claims that ``[c]ontract prices
are highly confidential in the business world * * * [and that its]
ability * * * to negotiate individual contracts would be severely
compromised if prices for these types of agreements were publicly
disclosed.'' Notice at 1-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Notice of United States Postal Service of Governors'
Decision Establishing Prices and Classifications for Global Plus
Contracts, June 2, 2008, at 1 (Notice).
\2\ The draft MCS remains under review. The Commission
anticipates providing interested persons an opportunity to comment
on the draft MCS in the near future. Modifications to the MCS, such
as proposed in Docket No. CP2008-8, should, in the future, be filed
in the dockets designated by the ``MC'' prefix. Contracts executed
pursuant to those requested classifications are appropriately filed
as ``CP'' dockets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The notices in Docket Nos. CP2008-9 and CP2008-10 announce
individual negotiated service agreements, namely, specific Global Plus
contracts that the Postal Service has entered into with individual
mailers.\3\ In support of these dockets, the Postal Service has also
filed materials, including the contracts and
[[Page 33466]]
supporting materials, under seal.\4\ The Postal Service asserts that
``[t]he names of customers who enter into respective contracts and the
related contract prices are highly confidential business information.''
Docket No. CP2008-9 Pricing Notice at 1; Docket No. CP2008-10 Pricing
Notice at 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Docket No. CP2008-9, Notice of United States Postal Service
Filing of a Global Plus Contract, June 2, 2008 (Docket No. CP2008-9
Pricing Notice); Docket No. CP2008-10, Notice of United States
Postal Service of Filing a Global Plus Contract, June 2, 2008
(Docket No. CP2008-10 Pricing Notice).
\4\ The Postal Service's filings under seal did not comply with
the Commission's procedural rules. The Postal Service is reminded
that a cover sheet must be attached to all documents being filed
under seal. The cover sheet must contain the caption and title
pursuant to 39 CFR 3001.11(a). Consistent with previous practice,
documents filed under seal should contain a statement similar to the
following: ``CONFIDENTIAL--DOCUMENT FILED UNDER SEAL.'' See, e.g.,
Docket No. MC2005-3, P.O. Ruling MC2005-3/2, at Attachment para. 10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Postal Service's filings in these dockets are related. Docket
No. CP2008-8 establishes, in essence, a shell classification, while
Docket Nos. CP2008-9 and CP2008-10 are specific agreements negotiated
pursuant to the conditions of the shell classification. Given this
interrelationship, the Commission reviews these proceedings together in
this order.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ While this order treats these proceedings together due to
their interrelated nature, future filings should be made in the
docket related to the issues being addressed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In Order No. 43, the Commission issued regulations establishing a
modern system of rate regulation, including a list of competitive
products. PRC Order No. 43, October 29, 2007, 3061, 4013. Among other
things, the Commission determined that each negotiated service
agreement would initially be classified as a separate product. The
Commission also acknowledged, however, the possibility of grouping
functionally equivalent agreements as a single product if they exhibit
similar cost and market characteristics. Id. 2177 and 3001. In its
filings, the Postal Service does not contend or provide support for the
proposition that these two agreements are premised on similar cost and
market characteristics. Thus, the specific Global Plus agreements filed
in Docket Nos. CP2008-9 and CP2008-10 will be classified as new
products.
As noted above, the Postal Service filed all three above-captioned
dockets pursuant to 39 CFR 3015.5.\6\ Recognizing that the Postal
Service's filings in these proceedings represent a series of recent
filings involving competitive rates not of general applicability under
39 U.S.C. 3632(b)(3), the Commission will proceed as if the Global Plus
negotiated service agreements also had been filed pursuant to 39 CFR
part 3020, subpart B.\7\ As a consequence, the Commission will also
review the dockets pursuant to 39 CFR 3020.34. Because the Commission
in its own discretion will review these dockets under 39 CFR 3020.34,
the Postal Service may, if it wishes to do so, supplement the materials
already filed with the Commission.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Docket No. CP2008-8 was also filed pursuant to 39 CFR
3020.90.
\7\ In Order Nos. 78 and 79, the Commission provided guidance on
the filing procedures that should be used for such filings in the
future. See PRC Order No. 78 at 3, n.6.
\8\ The Commission characterizes the Governors' decision and
associated materials filed in Docket No. CP2008-8 as material that
supports the specific negotiated service agreements filed in Docket
Nos. CP2008-9 and CP2008-10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, the Commission directs the Postal Service to identify
and list any contracts currently in existence (and their respective
expiration dates) that would no longer qualify as Global Plus contracts
under proposed revised section 2610.5 to the draft MCS attached to the
Notice in Docket No. CP2008-8. The Commission also directs the Postal
Service to provide a detailed justification for why it believes that
Global Plus contracts' expiration dates (without disclosing the
identity of the customers) should not be made publicly available. The
Postal Service must also address the reasons why the entire Governors'
decision is considered to be highly confidential or otherwise entitled
to be filed under seal.
Under the negotiated service agreements at issue, mailers would pay
discounted rates prior to necessary regulatory approval for such rates
subject to subsequent collection of the full rate if regulatory
approval is not obtained. The Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act
does not appear to contemplate this arrangement for new products. See
39 U.S.C. 3642(e). The Postal Service should address this issue in its
comments.
Answers to the Commission's questions and any supplemental
materials that the Postal Service plans to provide are due no later
than June 13, 2008.
Interested persons may express views and offer comments on whether
the planned changes are consistent with the policies of 39 U.S.C. 3632,
3633, or 3642. Comments are due no later than June 19, 2008.
Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Paul L. Harrington is appointed to serve
as officer of the Commission (Public Representative) to represent the
interests of the general public in the above-captioned dockets.
It is ordered:
1. Responses to the Commission's questions set forth in the body of
this order and any supplemental materials that the Postal Service
wishes to provide are due no later than June 13, 2008.
2. Comments by interested persons on issues in these proceedings
are due no later than June 19, 2008.
3. The Commission appoints Paul L. Harrington as Public
Representative to represent the interests of the general public in
these proceedings.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for publication of this order in the
Federal Register.
By the Commission.
Steven W. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-13161 Filed 6-11-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P