Marine Mammal Protection Act; Stock Assessment Report, 32732-32734 [E8-12890]
Download as PDF
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with NOTICES
32732
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 112 / Tuesday, June 10, 2008 / Notices
EIS/EIR to inform their discretionary
decision to issue to a PGP for certain
components of the proposed SSHCP.
The California Department of Fish
and Game (CDFG) will be a NEPA
Cooperating Agency on the proposed
EIS/EIR pursuant to 40 CFR 1501.6 and
1508.5. The County and their partners
expect to apply to CDFG for an
incidental take permit under Section
2081 of the California Fish and Game
code and to apply for a Lake or
Streambed Alteration Agreement under
Section 1600 of the California Fish and
Game code. CDFG intends to use the
EIS/EIR in conducting its review of the
SSHCP as a CEQA Trustee Agency.
CDFG will also use the EIS/EIR in
makings its CEQA findings in their
decision to issue an incidental take
permit under Section 2081 of the
California Fish and Game Code. As a
CEQA Responsible Agency, CDFG may
also use the EIS/EIR during their
consideration to approve a Lake or
Streambed Alteration Agreement under
Section 1600 of the California Fish and
Game Code. The SSHCP will
incorporate best management practices
that have been developed in cooperation
with, and approved by, CDFG.
This notice of intent is being
furnished in accordance with 40 CFR
Sections 1501.2, 1501.7, 1506.6, and
1508.22 to obtain suggestions,
comments, and useful information from
other agencies and the public on the
scope of the proposed EIS/EIR,
including the significant environmental
issues deserving of study, the range of
actions, the range of alternatives, and
the range of impacts to be considered.
Written comments from interested
parties are invited to ensure that all
issues related to the proposed section
10(a)(1)(B) incidental-take permit
application are identified. Comments
will only be accepted in written form.
You may submit written comments by
mail, facsimile transmission, or in
person (see ADDRESSES). All comments
received will become part of the official
administrative record. Our practice is to
make comment letters (including names,
home addresses, home phone numbers
and email addresses of respondents)
available for public review. You may
request that we withhold personal
information, if so, please state this
prominently at the beginning of your
comments. However, we cannot
guarantee that we will be able to do so.
Dated: June 4, 2008.
John Engbring,
Deputy Regional Director, California and
Nevada Region, Sacramento, California.
[FR Doc. E8–12963 Filed 6–9–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Jun 09, 2008
Jkt 211001
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R9–FHC–2008–N0085; 80221–1113–
0000–L5]
Marine Mammal Protection Act; Stock
Assessment Report
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability of draft
revised marine mammal stock
assessment report for the southern sea
otter in California; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA), the Fish and Wildlife Service
(Service) has developed a draft revised
marine mammal stock assessment report
for the southern sea otter (Enhydra lutris
nereis) stock in the State of California,
which is available for public review and
comment.
DATES: Comments must be received by
September 8, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the draft revised
stock assessment report for the southern
sea otter in California are available from
the Field Supervisor, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Ventura Fish and
Wildlife Office, 2493 Portola Road,
Suite B, Ventura, CA 93003; (805) 644–
1766. It can also be viewed in Adobe
Acrobat by navigating to the species
information page for the southern sea
otter at https://www.fws.gov/ventura.
If you wish to submit comments on
the draft revised stock assessment report
for the southern sea otter in California,
you may do so by any of the following
methods:
1. You may mail or hand-deliver
(during normal business hours) written
comments to the Field Supervisor, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, Ventura Fish
and Wildlife Office, 2493 Portola Road,
Suite B, Ventura, CA 93003.
2. You may fax your comments to
(805) 644–3958.
3. You may send comments by
electronic mail (e-mail) to
fw8ssostock@fws.gov.
One of the
goals of the MMPA is to ensure that
stocks of marine mammals occurring in
waters under the jurisdiction of the
United States do not experience a level
of human-caused mortality and serious
injury that is likely to cause the stock to
be reduced below its optimum
sustainable population level (OSP). OSP
is defined as ‘‘the number of animals
which will result in the maximum
productivity of the population or the
species, keeping in mind the carrying
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
capacity of the habitat and the health of
the ecosystem of which they form a
constituent element.’’
To help accomplish the goal of
maintaining marine mammal stocks at
their OSPs, section 117 of the MMPA
(16 U.S.C. 1361–1407) requires the
Service and the National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS) to prepare
stock assessment reports for each
marine mammal stock that occurs in
waters under the jurisdiction of the
United States. These stock assessments
are to be based on the best scientific
information available and are, therefore,
prepared in consultation with
established regional scientific review
groups. Each stock assessment must
include: (1) A description of the stock
and its geographic range; (2) a minimum
population estimate, maximum net
productivity rate, and current
population trend; (3) an estimate of
human-caused mortality and serious
injury; (4) a description of commercial
fishery interactions; (5) the status of the
stock; and (6) the potential biological
removal level (PBR). The PBR is defined
as ‘‘the maximum number of animals,
not including natural mortalities, that
may be removed from a marine mammal
stock while allowing that stock to reach
or maintain its OSP.’’ The PBR is the
product of the minimum population
estimate of the stock (Nmin), one-half the
maximum theoretical or estimated net
productivity rate of the stock at a small
population size (Rmax); and a recovery
factor (Fr) of between 0.1 and 1.0, which
is intended to compensate for
uncertainty and unknown estimation
errors.
Section 117 of the MMPA also
requires the Service and the NMFS to
review the stock assessment reports: (A)
At least annually for stocks that are
specified as strategic stocks; (B) at least
annually for stocks for which significant
new information is available; and (C) at
least once every 3 years for all other
stocks.
A strategic stock is defined in the
MMPA as a marine mammal stock: (A)
For which the level of direct humancaused mortality exceeds the potential
biological removal level; (B) which,
based on the best available scientific
information, is declining and is likely to
be listed as a threatened species under
the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.),
within the foreseeable future; or (C)
which is listed as a threatened or
endangered species under the
Endangered Species Act, or is
designated as depleted under the
MMPA.
A summary of the draft revised stock
assessment report for southern sea otters
E:\FR\FM\10JNN1.SGM
10JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 112 / Tuesday, June 10, 2008 / Notices
in California is presented in Table 1.
The table lists the stock’s Nmin, Rmax, Fr,
PBR, annual estimated human-caused
mortality and serious injury, and status.
After consideration of any public
comments received, the Service will
revise the stock assessment, as
appropriate. We will publish a notice of
availability and summary of the final
stock assessment, including responses
to comments we received.
32733
In accordance with the MMPA, a list
of the sources of information or public
reports upon which the assessment is
based is included in this notice.
TABLE 1.—SUMMARY OF DRAFT REVISED STOCK ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR THE SOUTHERN SEA OTTER IN CALIFORNIA
Stock
NMIN
Southern sea otters:
Mainland California ..........................................
Mainland California San Nicolas Island (CA) ..
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with NOTICES
List of References
Bacon, C.E. 1994. An ecotoxicological
comparison of organic contaminants in
sea otters among populations in
California and Alaska. M.S. thesis,
University of California, Santa Cruz.
Bacon, C.E., W.M. Jarman, J.A. Estes, M.
Simon, and R.J. Norstrom. 1999.
Comparison of organochlorine
contaminants among sea otter (Enhydra
lutris) populations in California and
Alaska. Environ. Toxicology and
Chemistry 18(3):452–458.
Bryant, H.C. 1915. Sea otters near Point Sur.
California Department of Fish and Game
Bull. 1:134–135.
Cameron, G.A., and K.A. Forney. 2000.
Preliminary estimates of cetacean
mortality in California/Oregon gillnet
fisheries for 1999. Paper SC/S2/O24
presented to the International Whaling
Commission, 2000 (unpublished). 12 pp.
Available from NMFS, Southwest
Fisheries Science Center, P.O. Box 271,
La Jolla, California, 92038, USA.
Carretta, J.V. 2001. Preliminary estimates of
cetacean mortality in California gillnet
fisheries for 2000. Paper SC/53/SM9
presented to the International Whaling
Commission, 2001 (unpublished). 21 pp.
Available from NMFS, Southwest
Fisheries Science Center, P.O. Box 271,
La Jolla, California, 92038, USA.
Cronin, M.A., J. Bodkin, B. Bellachey, J.A.
Estes, and J.C. Patton. 1996.
Mitochondrial-DNA variation among
subspecies and populations of sea otters
(Enhydra lutris). J. Mammal. 77:546–557.
Estes, J.A. 1990. Growth and equilibrium in
sea otter populations. J. Anim. Ecol.
59:385–401.
Estes, J.A., and R.J. Jameson. 1988. A doublesurvey estimate for sighting probability
of sea otters in California. J. Wildl.
Manage. 52:70–76.
Estes, J.A., B.B. Hatfield, K. Ralls, and J.
Ames. 2003. Causes of mortality in
California sea otters during periods of
population growth and decline. Marine
Mammal Science 19(1):198–216.
Forney, K.A., S.R. Benson, and G.A.
Cameron. 2001. Central California gill
net effort and bycatch of sensitive
species, 1990–1998. Pages 141–160 in
Seabird Bycatch: Trends, Roadblocks,
and Solutions, E.F. Melvin and J.K.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Jun 09, 2008
Jkt 211001
RMAX
3,026
41
0.06
0.09
FR
0.1
0.1
Parrish, eds. Proceedings of an
International Symposium of the Pacific
Seabird Group, University of Alaska Sea
Grant, Fairbanks, Alaska, 212 pp.
Hatfield, B.B., and J.A. Estes. 2000.
Preliminary results of an evaluation of
the potential threat to sea otters posed by
the nearshore finfish trap fishery.
Unpublished. 6 pp. + appendices.
Herrick, S.F., Jr., and D. Hanan. 1988. A
review of California entangling net
fisheries, 1981–1986. National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration
Technical Memorandum. National
Marine Fisheries Service. NOAA–TM–
NMFS–SWFC–108. 39 pp.
Jameson, R.J. 1989. Movements, home range,
and territories of male sea otters off
central California. Marine Mammal
Science 5:159–172.
Jameson, R.J., and S. Jeffries. 1999. Results of
the 1999 survey of the Washington sea
otter population. Unpublished report. 5
pp.
Jameson, R.J., and S. Jeffries. 2005. Results of
the 2005 survey of the reintroduced
Washington sea otter population.
Unpublished report. 6 pp.
Kannan, K., E. Perrotta, and N.J. Thomas.
2006. Association between
perfluorinated compounds and
pathological conditions in southern sea
otters. Environmental Science &
Technology 40:4943–4948.
Kannan, K., E. Perrotta, N.J. Thomas, and
K.M. Aldous. 2007. A comparative
analysis of polybrominated diphenyl
ethers and polychlorinated biphenyls in
southern sea otters that died of infectious
diseases and noninfectious causes.
Archives of Environmental
Contamination and Toxicology 53:293–
302.
Kannan K., K.S. Guruge, N.J. Thomas, S.
Tanabe, J.P. Giesy. 1998. Butyltin
residues in southern sea otters (Enhydra
lutris nereis) found dead along California
coastal waters. Environmental Science
and Technology 32:1169–1175.
Kooyman, G.L., and D.P. Costa. 1979.
Effects of oiling on temperature regulation in
sea otters. Yearly progress report, Outer
Continental Shelf Energy Assessment
Program.
Kreuder, C., M.A. Miller, D.A. Jessup, L.J.
Lowenstein, M.D. Harris, J.A. Ames, T.E.
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Annual estimated average
human-caused
mortality
PBR
9
0
Unknown ..........
Unknown ...........
Stock status
Strategic.
Strategic.
Carpenter, P.A. Conrad, and J.A.K. Mazet.
2003. Patterns of mortality in southern sea
otters (Enhydra lutris nereis) from 1998–
2001. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 39(3):495–
509.
Kreuder, C., M.A. Miller, L.J. Lowenstine,
P.A. Conrad, T.E. Carpenter, D.A. Jessup, and
J.A.K. Mazet. 2005. Evaluation of cardiac
lesions and risk factors associated with
myocarditis and dilated cardiomyopathy in
southern sea otters (Enhydra lutris nereis).
American Journal of Veterinary Research
66:289–299.
Laidre, K.L., R.J. Jameson, and D.P.
DeMaster. 2001. An estimation of carrying
capacity for sea otters along the California
coast. Marine Mammal Science 17(2):294–
309.
Larson, S., R. Jameson, J. Bodkin, M.
Staedler, and P. Bentzen. 2002. Microsatellite
DNA and mitochondrial DNA variation in
remnant and translocated sea otter (Enhydra
lutris) populations. J. Mammal. 83(3):893–
906.
Mayer, K.A., M.D. Dailey, and M.A. Miller.
2003. Helminth parasites of the southern sea
otter Enhydra lutris nereis in central
California: abundance, distribution, and
pathology. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms
53:77–88.
Nakata, H., K. Kannan, L. Jing, N. Thomas,
S. Tanabe, and J.P. Giesy. 1998.
Accumulation pattern of organochlorine
pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls in
southern sea otters (Enhydra lutris nereis)
found stranded along coastal California,
USA. Environ. Poll. 103:45–53.
Ralls, K., T.C. Eagle, and D.B. Siniff. 1996.
Movement and spatial use patterns of
California sea otters. Canadian Journal of
Zoology 74:1841–1849.
Riedman, M.L., and J.A. Estes. 1990. The
sea otter (Enhydra lutris): behavior, ecology,
and natural history. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Biol. Rep. 90(14). 126 pp.
Riedman, M.L., J.A. Estes, M.M. Staedler,
A.A. Giles, and D.R. Carlson. 1994. Breeding
patterns and reproductive success of
California sea otters. J. Wildl. Manage.
58:391–399.
Sanchez, M.S. 1992. Differentiation and
variability of mitochondrial DNA in three sea
otter, Enhydra lutris, populations. M.S.
Thesis, University of California Santa Cruz.
Siniff, D.B., and K. Ralls. 1991.
Reproduction, survival, and tag loss in
E:\FR\FM\10JNN1.SGM
10JNN1
32734
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 112 / Tuesday, June 10, 2008 / Notices
California sea otters. Marine Mammal
Science 7(3):211–229.
Siniff, D.B., T.D. Williams, A.M. Johnson,
and D.L. Garshelis. 1982. Experiments on the
response of sea otters, Enhydra lutris, to oil
contamination. Biol. Conserv. 2: 261–272.
Taylor, B.L., M. Scott, J. Heyning, and J.
Barlow. 2002. Suggested guidelines for
recovery factors for endangered marine
mammals. Unpublished report submitted to
the Pacific Scientific Review Group. 7 pp.
Tinker, M.T., G. Bentall, and J.A. Estes.
2008. Food limitation leads to behavioral
diversification and dietary specialization in
sea otters. PNAS 105:560–565.
Tinker, M.T., J.A. Estes, K. Ralls, T.M.
Williams, D. Jessup, and D.P. Costa. 2006.
Population Dynamics and Biology of the
California Sea Otter (Enhydra lutris nereis) at
the Southern End of its Range. MMS OCS
Study 2006–007. Coastal Research Center,
Marine Science Institute, University of
California, Santa Barbara, California. MMS
Cooperative Agreement Number 14–35–
0001–31063.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2003. Final
Revised Recovery Plan for the Southern Sea
Otter (Enhydra lutris nereis). Portland,
Oregon. xi + 165 pp.
Wendell, F.E., R.A. Hardy, and J.A. Ames.
1986. An assessment of the accidental take of
sea otters, Enhydra lutris, in gill and trammel
nets. California Department of Fish and
Game, Mar. Res. Tech. Rep. 1991. Geographic
variation in sea otters, Enhydra lutris. J.
Mammal. 72(1):22–36.
Wilson, D.E., M.A. Bogan, R.L. Brownell,
Jr., A.M. Burdin, and M.K. Maminov. 1991.
Geographic variation in sea otters, Enhydra
lutris. J. Mammal. 72(1):22–36.
Dated: June 3, 2008.
H. Dale Hall,
Director, Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. E8–12890 Filed 6–9–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[AA–8101–01, AA–8101–03, AA–8101–04,
AA–8101–05, AA–8101–09; AK–964–1410–
KC–P]
Alaska Native Claims Selection
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of decision approving
lands for conveyance.
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: As required by 43 CFR
2650.7(d), notice is hereby given that an
appealable decision approving the
subsurface estate in certain lands for
conveyance pursuant to the Alaska
Native Claims Settlement Act will be
issued to The Aleut Corporation. The
lands are in the vicinity of the Alaska
Peninsula, and are located in:
Seward Meridian, Alaska
T. 49 S., R. 69 W.,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Jun 09, 2008
Jkt 211001
Sec. 1;
Secs. 11 to 15, inclusive;
Secs. 21 to 36, inclusive.
Containing approximately 14,026 acres.
T. 50 S., R. 69 W.,
Secs. 1 to 15, inclusive;
Secs. 18, 19, 22, and 24.
Containing approximately 12,052 acres.
T. 52 S., R. 73 W.,
Secs. 19 and 20;
Secs. 29 to 32, inclusive.
Containing 3,833.64 acres.
T. 52 S., R. 74 W.,
Sec. 24.
Containing 640 acres.
T. 53 S., R. 74 W.,
Secs. 17 to 20, inclusive.
Containing 2,501.16 acres.
T. 53 S., R. 75 W.,
Secs. 3, 10, 11, and 13;
Secs. 14, 15, and 22.
Containing 4,480 acres.
T. 55 S., R. 76 W.,
Sec. 6.
Containing 53.24 acres.
T. 55 S., R. 77 W.,
Secs. 1 to 12, inclusive;
Secs. 15 to 21, inclusive;
Sec. 30.
Containing approximately 10,207 acres.
T. 52 S., R. 78 W.,
Secs. 1 to 36, inclusive.
Containing 22,902.48 acres.
T. 55 S., R. 81 W.,
Secs. 7, 8, and 9;
Secs. 16 to 21, inclusive; Sec. 25;
Secs. 28 to 32, inclusive.
Containing approximately 6,110 acres.
T. 56 S., R. 81 W.,
Secs. 6 and 7.
Containing approximately 226 acres.
T. 56 S., R. 82 W.,
Secs. 1 to 23, inclusive;
Secs. 27 to 34, inclusive.
Containing approximately 17,075 acres.
T. 73 S., R. 121 W.,
Secs. 1, 2, 11, and 12.
Containing 2,560 acres.
Aggregating approximately 96,667 acres.
Notice of the decision will also be
published four times in the Dutch
Harbor Fisherman.
DATES: The time limits for filing an
appeal are:
1. Any party claiming a property
interest which is adversely affected by
the decision shall have until July 10,
2008 to file an appeal.
2. Parties receiving service of the
decision by certified mail shall have 30
days from the date of receipt to file an
appeal.
Parties who do not file an appeal in
accordance with the requirements of 43
CFR Part 4, Subpart E, shall be deemed
to have waived their rights.
ADDRESSES: A copy of the decision may
be obtained from: Bureau of Land
Management, Alaska State Office, 222
West Seventh Avenue, #13, Anchorage,
Alaska 99513–7504.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Bureau of Land Management by phone
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
at 907–271–5960, or by e-mail at
ak.blm.conveyance@ak.blm.gov. Persons
who use a telecommunication device
(TTD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–
8330, 24 hours a day, seven days a
week, to contact the Bureau of Land
Management.
Michael Bilancione,
Land Transfer Resolution Specialist, Land
Transfer Adjudication I.
[FR Doc. E8–12947 Filed 6–9–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–JA–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[ES–956–1910–BJ–5043, ES–051993, Group
No. 1, Rhode Island]
Eastern States: Filing of Plat of Survey
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of filing of plat of survey;
Rhode Island.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) will file the plat of
survey of the lands described below in
the BLM–Eastern States, Springfield,
Virginia, 30 calendar days from the date
of publication in the Federal Register.
Contact Information: Bureau of Land
Management, 7450 Boston Boulevard,
Springfield, Virginia 22153. Attn:
Cadastral Survey.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
survey was requested by the Bureau of
Indian Affairs and the Narragansett
Indian Tribe.
The lands we surveyed are:
Trust Lands of the Narragansett Indian
Tribe, Washington County, Rhode
Island; Survey of the Niles Land,
designated Tract No. 8.
The plat of survey represents the
survey of the Niles Land, designated
Tract No. 8, a portion of the lands held
in trust for the Narragansett Indian Tribe
in Washington County, Rhode Island,
and was accepted September 23, 2003.
We will place a copy of the plat we
described in the open files. It will be
available to the public as a matter of
information. If BLM receives a protest
against this survey, as shown on the
plat, prior to the date of the official
filing, we will stay the filing pending
our consideration of the protest. We will
not officially file the plat until the day
after we have accepted or dismissed all
protests and they have become final,
including decisions on appeals. Copies
of the plat will be made available upon
request and prepayment of the
reproduction fees.
E:\FR\FM\10JNN1.SGM
10JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 112 (Tuesday, June 10, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32732-32734]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-12890]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R9-FHC-2008-N0085; 80221-1113-0000-L5]
Marine Mammal Protection Act; Stock Assessment Report
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability of draft revised marine mammal stock
assessment report for the southern sea otter in California; request for
comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA),
the Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has developed a draft revised
marine mammal stock assessment report for the southern sea otter
(Enhydra lutris nereis) stock in the State of California, which is
available for public review and comment.
DATES: Comments must be received by September 8, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the draft revised stock assessment report for the
southern sea otter in California are available from the Field
Supervisor, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ventura Fish and Wildlife
Office, 2493 Portola Road, Suite B, Ventura, CA 93003; (805) 644-1766.
It can also be viewed in Adobe Acrobat by navigating to the species
information page for the southern sea otter at https://www.fws.gov/
ventura.
If you wish to submit comments on the draft revised stock
assessment report for the southern sea otter in California, you may do
so by any of the following methods:
1. You may mail or hand-deliver (during normal business hours)
written comments to the Field Supervisor, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office, 2493 Portola Road, Suite B,
Ventura, CA 93003.
2. You may fax your comments to (805) 644-3958.
3. You may send comments by electronic mail (e-mail) to
fw8ssostock@fws.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: One of the goals of the MMPA is to ensure
that stocks of marine mammals occurring in waters under the
jurisdiction of the United States do not experience a level of human-
caused mortality and serious injury that is likely to cause the stock
to be reduced below its optimum sustainable population level (OSP). OSP
is defined as ``the number of animals which will result in the maximum
productivity of the population or the species, keeping in mind the
carrying capacity of the habitat and the health of the ecosystem of
which they form a constituent element.''
To help accomplish the goal of maintaining marine mammal stocks at
their OSPs, section 117 of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361-1407) requires the
Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) to prepare
stock assessment reports for each marine mammal stock that occurs in
waters under the jurisdiction of the United States. These stock
assessments are to be based on the best scientific information
available and are, therefore, prepared in consultation with established
regional scientific review groups. Each stock assessment must include:
(1) A description of the stock and its geographic range; (2) a minimum
population estimate, maximum net productivity rate, and current
population trend; (3) an estimate of human-caused mortality and serious
injury; (4) a description of commercial fishery interactions; (5) the
status of the stock; and (6) the potential biological removal level
(PBR). The PBR is defined as ``the maximum number of animals, not
including natural mortalities, that may be removed from a marine mammal
stock while allowing that stock to reach or maintain its OSP.'' The PBR
is the product of the minimum population estimate of the stock
(Nmin), one-half the maximum theoretical or estimated net
productivity rate of the stock at a small population size
(Rmax); and a recovery factor (Fr) of between 0.1
and 1.0, which is intended to compensate for uncertainty and unknown
estimation errors.
Section 117 of the MMPA also requires the Service and the NMFS to
review the stock assessment reports: (A) At least annually for stocks
that are specified as strategic stocks; (B) at least annually for
stocks for which significant new information is available; and (C) at
least once every 3 years for all other stocks.
A strategic stock is defined in the MMPA as a marine mammal stock:
(A) For which the level of direct human-caused mortality exceeds the
potential biological removal level; (B) which, based on the best
available scientific information, is declining and is likely to be
listed as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act of
1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), within the foreseeable
future; or (C) which is listed as a threatened or endangered species
under the Endangered Species Act, or is designated as depleted under
the MMPA.
A summary of the draft revised stock assessment report for southern
sea otters
[[Page 32733]]
in California is presented in Table 1. The table lists the stock's
Nmin, Rmax, Fr, PBR, annual estimated
human-caused mortality and serious injury, and status. After
consideration of any public comments received, the Service will revise
the stock assessment, as appropriate. We will publish a notice of
availability and summary of the final stock assessment, including
responses to comments we received.
In accordance with the MMPA, a list of the sources of information
or public reports upon which the assessment is based is included in
this notice.
Table 1.--Summary of Draft Revised Stock Assessment Report for the Southern Sea Otter in California
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual estimated average human-
Stock NMIN RMAX FR PBR caused mortality Stock status
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Southern sea otters:
Mainland California................ 3,026 0.06 0.1 9 Unknown........................ Strategic.
Mainland California San Nicolas 41 0.09 0.1 0 Unknown........................ Strategic.
Island (CA).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
List of References
Bacon, C.E. 1994. An ecotoxicological comparison of organic
contaminants in sea otters among populations in California and
Alaska. M.S. thesis, University of California, Santa Cruz.
Bacon, C.E., W.M. Jarman, J.A. Estes, M. Simon, and R.J. Norstrom.
1999. Comparison of organochlorine contaminants among sea otter
(Enhydra lutris) populations in California and Alaska. Environ.
Toxicology and Chemistry 18(3):452-458.
Bryant, H.C. 1915. Sea otters near Point Sur. California Department
of Fish and Game Bull. 1:134-135.
Cameron, G.A., and K.A. Forney. 2000. Preliminary estimates of
cetacean mortality in California/Oregon gillnet fisheries for 1999.
Paper SC/S2/O24 presented to the International Whaling Commission,
2000 (unpublished). 12 pp. Available from NMFS, Southwest Fisheries
Science Center, P.O. Box 271, La Jolla, California, 92038, USA.
Carretta, J.V. 2001. Preliminary estimates of cetacean mortality in
California gillnet fisheries for 2000. Paper SC/53/SM9 presented to
the International Whaling Commission, 2001 (unpublished). 21 pp.
Available from NMFS, Southwest Fisheries Science Center, P.O. Box
271, La Jolla, California, 92038, USA.
Cronin, M.A., J. Bodkin, B. Bellachey, J.A. Estes, and J.C. Patton.
1996. Mitochondrial-DNA variation among subspecies and populations
of sea otters (Enhydra lutris). J. Mammal. 77:546-557.
Estes, J.A. 1990. Growth and equilibrium in sea otter populations.
J. Anim. Ecol. 59:385-401.
Estes, J.A., and R.J. Jameson. 1988. A double-survey estimate for
sighting probability of sea otters in California. J. Wildl. Manage.
52:70-76.
Estes, J.A., B.B. Hatfield, K. Ralls, and J. Ames. 2003. Causes of
mortality in California sea otters during periods of population
growth and decline. Marine Mammal Science 19(1):198-216.
Forney, K.A., S.R. Benson, and G.A. Cameron. 2001. Central
California gill net effort and bycatch of sensitive species, 1990-
1998. Pages 141-160 in Seabird Bycatch: Trends, Roadblocks, and
Solutions, E.F. Melvin and J.K. Parrish, eds. Proceedings of an
International Symposium of the Pacific Seabird Group, University of
Alaska Sea Grant, Fairbanks, Alaska, 212 pp.
Hatfield, B.B., and J.A. Estes. 2000. Preliminary results of an
evaluation of the potential threat to sea otters posed by the
nearshore finfish trap fishery. Unpublished. 6 pp. + appendices.
Herrick, S.F., Jr., and D. Hanan. 1988. A review of California
entangling net fisheries, 1981-1986. National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration Technical Memorandum. National Marine
Fisheries Service. NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFC-108. 39 pp.
Jameson, R.J. 1989. Movements, home range, and territories of male
sea otters off central California. Marine Mammal Science 5:159-172.
Jameson, R.J., and S. Jeffries. 1999. Results of the 1999 survey of
the Washington sea otter population. Unpublished report. 5 pp.
Jameson, R.J., and S. Jeffries. 2005. Results of the 2005 survey of
the reintroduced Washington sea otter population. Unpublished
report. 6 pp.
Kannan, K., E. Perrotta, and N.J. Thomas. 2006. Association between
perfluorinated compounds and pathological conditions in southern sea
otters. Environmental Science & Technology 40:4943-4948.
Kannan, K., E. Perrotta, N.J. Thomas, and K.M. Aldous. 2007. A
comparative analysis of polybrominated diphenyl ethers and
polychlorinated biphenyls in southern sea otters that died of
infectious diseases and noninfectious causes. Archives of
Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 53:293-302.
Kannan K., K.S. Guruge, N.J. Thomas, S. Tanabe, J.P. Giesy. 1998.
Butyltin residues in southern sea otters (Enhydra lutris nereis)
found dead along California coastal waters. Environmental Science
and Technology 32:1169-1175.
Kooyman, G.L., and D.P. Costa. 1979. Effects of oiling on
temperature regulation in sea otters. Yearly progress report, Outer
Continental Shelf Energy Assessment Program.
Kreuder, C., M.A. Miller, D.A. Jessup, L.J. Lowenstein, M.D.
Harris, J.A. Ames, T.E. Carpenter, P.A. Conrad, and J.A.K. Mazet.
2003. Patterns of mortality in southern sea otters (Enhydra lutris
nereis) from 1998-2001. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 39(3):495-509.
Kreuder, C., M.A. Miller, L.J. Lowenstine, P.A. Conrad, T.E.
Carpenter, D.A. Jessup, and J.A.K. Mazet. 2005. Evaluation of
cardiac lesions and risk factors associated with myocarditis and
dilated cardiomyopathy in southern sea otters (Enhydra lutris
nereis). American Journal of Veterinary Research 66:289-299.
Laidre, K.L., R.J. Jameson, and D.P. DeMaster. 2001. An
estimation of carrying capacity for sea otters along the California
coast. Marine Mammal Science 17(2):294-309.
Larson, S., R. Jameson, J. Bodkin, M. Staedler, and P. Bentzen.
2002. Microsatellite DNA and mitochondrial DNA variation in remnant
and translocated sea otter (Enhydra lutris) populations. J. Mammal.
83(3):893-906.
Mayer, K.A., M.D. Dailey, and M.A. Miller. 2003. Helminth
parasites of the southern sea otter Enhydra lutris nereis in central
California: abundance, distribution, and pathology. Diseases of
Aquatic Organisms 53:77-88.
Nakata, H., K. Kannan, L. Jing, N. Thomas, S. Tanabe, and J.P.
Giesy. 1998. Accumulation pattern of organochlorine pesticides and
polychlorinated biphenyls in southern sea otters (Enhydra lutris
nereis) found stranded along coastal California, USA. Environ. Poll.
103:45-53.
Ralls, K., T.C. Eagle, and D.B. Siniff. 1996. Movement and
spatial use patterns of California sea otters. Canadian Journal of
Zoology 74:1841-1849.
Riedman, M.L., and J.A. Estes. 1990. The sea otter (Enhydra
lutris): behavior, ecology, and natural history. U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Biol. Rep. 90(14). 126 pp.
Riedman, M.L., J.A. Estes, M.M. Staedler, A.A. Giles, and D.R.
Carlson. 1994. Breeding patterns and reproductive success of
California sea otters. J. Wildl. Manage. 58:391-399.
Sanchez, M.S. 1992. Differentiation and variability of
mitochondrial DNA in three sea otter, Enhydra lutris, populations.
M.S. Thesis, University of California Santa Cruz.
Siniff, D.B., and K. Ralls. 1991. Reproduction, survival, and
tag loss in
[[Page 32734]]
California sea otters. Marine Mammal Science 7(3):211-229.
Siniff, D.B., T.D. Williams, A.M. Johnson, and D.L. Garshelis.
1982. Experiments on the response of sea otters, Enhydra lutris, to
oil contamination. Biol. Conserv. 2: 261-272.
Taylor, B.L., M. Scott, J. Heyning, and J. Barlow. 2002.
Suggested guidelines for recovery factors for endangered marine
mammals. Unpublished report submitted to the Pacific Scientific
Review Group. 7 pp.
Tinker, M.T., G. Bentall, and J.A. Estes. 2008. Food limitation
leads to behavioral diversification and dietary specialization in
sea otters. PNAS 105:560-565.
Tinker, M.T., J.A. Estes, K. Ralls, T.M. Williams, D. Jessup,
and D.P. Costa. 2006. Population Dynamics and Biology of the
California Sea Otter (Enhydra lutris nereis) at the Southern End of
its Range. MMS OCS Study 2006-007. Coastal Research Center, Marine
Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara,
California. MMS Cooperative Agreement Number 14-35-0001-31063.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2003. Final Revised Recovery
Plan for the Southern Sea Otter (Enhydra lutris nereis). Portland,
Oregon. xi + 165 pp.
Wendell, F.E., R.A. Hardy, and J.A. Ames. 1986. An assessment of
the accidental take of sea otters, Enhydra lutris, in gill and
trammel nets. California Department of Fish and Game, Mar. Res.
Tech. Rep. 1991. Geographic variation in sea otters, Enhydra lutris.
J. Mammal. 72(1):22-36.
Wilson, D.E., M.A. Bogan, R.L. Brownell, Jr., A.M. Burdin, and
M.K. Maminov. 1991. Geographic variation in sea otters, Enhydra
lutris. J. Mammal. 72(1):22-36.
Dated: June 3, 2008.
H. Dale Hall,
Director, Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. E8-12890 Filed 6-9-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P