Marine Mammal Protection Act; Stock Assessment Report, 32732-32734 [E8-12890]

Download as PDF dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with NOTICES 32732 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 112 / Tuesday, June 10, 2008 / Notices EIS/EIR to inform their discretionary decision to issue to a PGP for certain components of the proposed SSHCP. The California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) will be a NEPA Cooperating Agency on the proposed EIS/EIR pursuant to 40 CFR 1501.6 and 1508.5. The County and their partners expect to apply to CDFG for an incidental take permit under Section 2081 of the California Fish and Game code and to apply for a Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement under Section 1600 of the California Fish and Game code. CDFG intends to use the EIS/EIR in conducting its review of the SSHCP as a CEQA Trustee Agency. CDFG will also use the EIS/EIR in makings its CEQA findings in their decision to issue an incidental take permit under Section 2081 of the California Fish and Game Code. As a CEQA Responsible Agency, CDFG may also use the EIS/EIR during their consideration to approve a Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement under Section 1600 of the California Fish and Game Code. The SSHCP will incorporate best management practices that have been developed in cooperation with, and approved by, CDFG. This notice of intent is being furnished in accordance with 40 CFR Sections 1501.2, 1501.7, 1506.6, and 1508.22 to obtain suggestions, comments, and useful information from other agencies and the public on the scope of the proposed EIS/EIR, including the significant environmental issues deserving of study, the range of actions, the range of alternatives, and the range of impacts to be considered. Written comments from interested parties are invited to ensure that all issues related to the proposed section 10(a)(1)(B) incidental-take permit application are identified. Comments will only be accepted in written form. You may submit written comments by mail, facsimile transmission, or in person (see ADDRESSES). All comments received will become part of the official administrative record. Our practice is to make comment letters (including names, home addresses, home phone numbers and email addresses of respondents) available for public review. You may request that we withhold personal information, if so, please state this prominently at the beginning of your comments. However, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Dated: June 4, 2008. John Engbring, Deputy Regional Director, California and Nevada Region, Sacramento, California. [FR Doc. E8–12963 Filed 6–9–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–55–P VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:35 Jun 09, 2008 Jkt 211001 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service [FWS–R9–FHC–2008–N0085; 80221–1113– 0000–L5] Marine Mammal Protection Act; Stock Assessment Report Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice of availability of draft revised marine mammal stock assessment report for the southern sea otter in California; request for comments. AGENCY: SUMMARY: In accordance with the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), the Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has developed a draft revised marine mammal stock assessment report for the southern sea otter (Enhydra lutris nereis) stock in the State of California, which is available for public review and comment. DATES: Comments must be received by September 8, 2008. ADDRESSES: Copies of the draft revised stock assessment report for the southern sea otter in California are available from the Field Supervisor, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office, 2493 Portola Road, Suite B, Ventura, CA 93003; (805) 644– 1766. It can also be viewed in Adobe Acrobat by navigating to the species information page for the southern sea otter at https://www.fws.gov/ventura. If you wish to submit comments on the draft revised stock assessment report for the southern sea otter in California, you may do so by any of the following methods: 1. You may mail or hand-deliver (during normal business hours) written comments to the Field Supervisor, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office, 2493 Portola Road, Suite B, Ventura, CA 93003. 2. You may fax your comments to (805) 644–3958. 3. You may send comments by electronic mail (e-mail) to fw8ssostock@fws.gov. One of the goals of the MMPA is to ensure that stocks of marine mammals occurring in waters under the jurisdiction of the United States do not experience a level of human-caused mortality and serious injury that is likely to cause the stock to be reduced below its optimum sustainable population level (OSP). OSP is defined as ‘‘the number of animals which will result in the maximum productivity of the population or the species, keeping in mind the carrying SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PO 00000 Frm 00058 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 capacity of the habitat and the health of the ecosystem of which they form a constituent element.’’ To help accomplish the goal of maintaining marine mammal stocks at their OSPs, section 117 of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361–1407) requires the Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) to prepare stock assessment reports for each marine mammal stock that occurs in waters under the jurisdiction of the United States. These stock assessments are to be based on the best scientific information available and are, therefore, prepared in consultation with established regional scientific review groups. Each stock assessment must include: (1) A description of the stock and its geographic range; (2) a minimum population estimate, maximum net productivity rate, and current population trend; (3) an estimate of human-caused mortality and serious injury; (4) a description of commercial fishery interactions; (5) the status of the stock; and (6) the potential biological removal level (PBR). The PBR is defined as ‘‘the maximum number of animals, not including natural mortalities, that may be removed from a marine mammal stock while allowing that stock to reach or maintain its OSP.’’ The PBR is the product of the minimum population estimate of the stock (Nmin), one-half the maximum theoretical or estimated net productivity rate of the stock at a small population size (Rmax); and a recovery factor (Fr) of between 0.1 and 1.0, which is intended to compensate for uncertainty and unknown estimation errors. Section 117 of the MMPA also requires the Service and the NMFS to review the stock assessment reports: (A) At least annually for stocks that are specified as strategic stocks; (B) at least annually for stocks for which significant new information is available; and (C) at least once every 3 years for all other stocks. A strategic stock is defined in the MMPA as a marine mammal stock: (A) For which the level of direct humancaused mortality exceeds the potential biological removal level; (B) which, based on the best available scientific information, is declining and is likely to be listed as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), within the foreseeable future; or (C) which is listed as a threatened or endangered species under the Endangered Species Act, or is designated as depleted under the MMPA. A summary of the draft revised stock assessment report for southern sea otters E:\FR\FM\10JNN1.SGM 10JNN1 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 112 / Tuesday, June 10, 2008 / Notices in California is presented in Table 1. The table lists the stock’s Nmin, Rmax, Fr, PBR, annual estimated human-caused mortality and serious injury, and status. After consideration of any public comments received, the Service will revise the stock assessment, as appropriate. We will publish a notice of availability and summary of the final stock assessment, including responses to comments we received. 32733 In accordance with the MMPA, a list of the sources of information or public reports upon which the assessment is based is included in this notice. TABLE 1.—SUMMARY OF DRAFT REVISED STOCK ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR THE SOUTHERN SEA OTTER IN CALIFORNIA Stock NMIN Southern sea otters: Mainland California .......................................... Mainland California San Nicolas Island (CA) .. dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with NOTICES List of References Bacon, C.E. 1994. An ecotoxicological comparison of organic contaminants in sea otters among populations in California and Alaska. M.S. thesis, University of California, Santa Cruz. Bacon, C.E., W.M. Jarman, J.A. Estes, M. Simon, and R.J. Norstrom. 1999. Comparison of organochlorine contaminants among sea otter (Enhydra lutris) populations in California and Alaska. Environ. Toxicology and Chemistry 18(3):452–458. Bryant, H.C. 1915. Sea otters near Point Sur. California Department of Fish and Game Bull. 1:134–135. Cameron, G.A., and K.A. Forney. 2000. Preliminary estimates of cetacean mortality in California/Oregon gillnet fisheries for 1999. Paper SC/S2/O24 presented to the International Whaling Commission, 2000 (unpublished). 12 pp. Available from NMFS, Southwest Fisheries Science Center, P.O. Box 271, La Jolla, California, 92038, USA. Carretta, J.V. 2001. Preliminary estimates of cetacean mortality in California gillnet fisheries for 2000. Paper SC/53/SM9 presented to the International Whaling Commission, 2001 (unpublished). 21 pp. Available from NMFS, Southwest Fisheries Science Center, P.O. Box 271, La Jolla, California, 92038, USA. Cronin, M.A., J. Bodkin, B. Bellachey, J.A. Estes, and J.C. Patton. 1996. Mitochondrial-DNA variation among subspecies and populations of sea otters (Enhydra lutris). J. Mammal. 77:546–557. Estes, J.A. 1990. Growth and equilibrium in sea otter populations. J. Anim. Ecol. 59:385–401. Estes, J.A., and R.J. Jameson. 1988. A doublesurvey estimate for sighting probability of sea otters in California. J. Wildl. Manage. 52:70–76. Estes, J.A., B.B. Hatfield, K. Ralls, and J. Ames. 2003. Causes of mortality in California sea otters during periods of population growth and decline. Marine Mammal Science 19(1):198–216. Forney, K.A., S.R. Benson, and G.A. Cameron. 2001. Central California gill net effort and bycatch of sensitive species, 1990–1998. Pages 141–160 in Seabird Bycatch: Trends, Roadblocks, and Solutions, E.F. Melvin and J.K. VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:35 Jun 09, 2008 Jkt 211001 RMAX 3,026 41 0.06 0.09 FR 0.1 0.1 Parrish, eds. Proceedings of an International Symposium of the Pacific Seabird Group, University of Alaska Sea Grant, Fairbanks, Alaska, 212 pp. Hatfield, B.B., and J.A. Estes. 2000. Preliminary results of an evaluation of the potential threat to sea otters posed by the nearshore finfish trap fishery. Unpublished. 6 pp. + appendices. Herrick, S.F., Jr., and D. Hanan. 1988. A review of California entangling net fisheries, 1981–1986. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Technical Memorandum. National Marine Fisheries Service. NOAA–TM– NMFS–SWFC–108. 39 pp. Jameson, R.J. 1989. Movements, home range, and territories of male sea otters off central California. Marine Mammal Science 5:159–172. Jameson, R.J., and S. Jeffries. 1999. Results of the 1999 survey of the Washington sea otter population. Unpublished report. 5 pp. Jameson, R.J., and S. Jeffries. 2005. Results of the 2005 survey of the reintroduced Washington sea otter population. Unpublished report. 6 pp. Kannan, K., E. Perrotta, and N.J. Thomas. 2006. Association between perfluorinated compounds and pathological conditions in southern sea otters. Environmental Science & Technology 40:4943–4948. Kannan, K., E. Perrotta, N.J. Thomas, and K.M. Aldous. 2007. A comparative analysis of polybrominated diphenyl ethers and polychlorinated biphenyls in southern sea otters that died of infectious diseases and noninfectious causes. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 53:293– 302. Kannan K., K.S. Guruge, N.J. Thomas, S. Tanabe, J.P. Giesy. 1998. Butyltin residues in southern sea otters (Enhydra lutris nereis) found dead along California coastal waters. Environmental Science and Technology 32:1169–1175. Kooyman, G.L., and D.P. Costa. 1979. Effects of oiling on temperature regulation in sea otters. Yearly progress report, Outer Continental Shelf Energy Assessment Program. Kreuder, C., M.A. Miller, D.A. Jessup, L.J. Lowenstein, M.D. Harris, J.A. Ames, T.E. PO 00000 Frm 00059 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Annual estimated average human-caused mortality PBR 9 0 Unknown .......... Unknown ........... Stock status Strategic. Strategic. Carpenter, P.A. Conrad, and J.A.K. Mazet. 2003. Patterns of mortality in southern sea otters (Enhydra lutris nereis) from 1998– 2001. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 39(3):495– 509. Kreuder, C., M.A. Miller, L.J. Lowenstine, P.A. Conrad, T.E. Carpenter, D.A. Jessup, and J.A.K. Mazet. 2005. Evaluation of cardiac lesions and risk factors associated with myocarditis and dilated cardiomyopathy in southern sea otters (Enhydra lutris nereis). American Journal of Veterinary Research 66:289–299. Laidre, K.L., R.J. Jameson, and D.P. DeMaster. 2001. An estimation of carrying capacity for sea otters along the California coast. Marine Mammal Science 17(2):294– 309. Larson, S., R. Jameson, J. Bodkin, M. Staedler, and P. Bentzen. 2002. Microsatellite DNA and mitochondrial DNA variation in remnant and translocated sea otter (Enhydra lutris) populations. J. Mammal. 83(3):893– 906. Mayer, K.A., M.D. Dailey, and M.A. Miller. 2003. Helminth parasites of the southern sea otter Enhydra lutris nereis in central California: abundance, distribution, and pathology. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 53:77–88. Nakata, H., K. Kannan, L. Jing, N. Thomas, S. Tanabe, and J.P. Giesy. 1998. Accumulation pattern of organochlorine pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls in southern sea otters (Enhydra lutris nereis) found stranded along coastal California, USA. Environ. Poll. 103:45–53. Ralls, K., T.C. Eagle, and D.B. Siniff. 1996. Movement and spatial use patterns of California sea otters. Canadian Journal of Zoology 74:1841–1849. Riedman, M.L., and J.A. Estes. 1990. The sea otter (Enhydra lutris): behavior, ecology, and natural history. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Biol. Rep. 90(14). 126 pp. Riedman, M.L., J.A. Estes, M.M. Staedler, A.A. Giles, and D.R. Carlson. 1994. Breeding patterns and reproductive success of California sea otters. J. Wildl. Manage. 58:391–399. Sanchez, M.S. 1992. Differentiation and variability of mitochondrial DNA in three sea otter, Enhydra lutris, populations. M.S. Thesis, University of California Santa Cruz. Siniff, D.B., and K. Ralls. 1991. Reproduction, survival, and tag loss in E:\FR\FM\10JNN1.SGM 10JNN1 32734 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 112 / Tuesday, June 10, 2008 / Notices California sea otters. Marine Mammal Science 7(3):211–229. Siniff, D.B., T.D. Williams, A.M. Johnson, and D.L. Garshelis. 1982. Experiments on the response of sea otters, Enhydra lutris, to oil contamination. Biol. Conserv. 2: 261–272. Taylor, B.L., M. Scott, J. Heyning, and J. Barlow. 2002. Suggested guidelines for recovery factors for endangered marine mammals. Unpublished report submitted to the Pacific Scientific Review Group. 7 pp. Tinker, M.T., G. Bentall, and J.A. Estes. 2008. Food limitation leads to behavioral diversification and dietary specialization in sea otters. PNAS 105:560–565. Tinker, M.T., J.A. Estes, K. Ralls, T.M. Williams, D. Jessup, and D.P. Costa. 2006. Population Dynamics and Biology of the California Sea Otter (Enhydra lutris nereis) at the Southern End of its Range. MMS OCS Study 2006–007. Coastal Research Center, Marine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, California. MMS Cooperative Agreement Number 14–35– 0001–31063. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2003. Final Revised Recovery Plan for the Southern Sea Otter (Enhydra lutris nereis). Portland, Oregon. xi + 165 pp. Wendell, F.E., R.A. Hardy, and J.A. Ames. 1986. An assessment of the accidental take of sea otters, Enhydra lutris, in gill and trammel nets. California Department of Fish and Game, Mar. Res. Tech. Rep. 1991. Geographic variation in sea otters, Enhydra lutris. J. Mammal. 72(1):22–36. Wilson, D.E., M.A. Bogan, R.L. Brownell, Jr., A.M. Burdin, and M.K. Maminov. 1991. Geographic variation in sea otters, Enhydra lutris. J. Mammal. 72(1):22–36. Dated: June 3, 2008. H. Dale Hall, Director, Fish and Wildlife Service. [FR Doc. E8–12890 Filed 6–9–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–55–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Land Management [AA–8101–01, AA–8101–03, AA–8101–04, AA–8101–05, AA–8101–09; AK–964–1410– KC–P] Alaska Native Claims Selection Bureau of Land Management, Interior. ACTION: Notice of decision approving lands for conveyance. dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with NOTICES AGENCY: SUMMARY: As required by 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice is hereby given that an appealable decision approving the subsurface estate in certain lands for conveyance pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act will be issued to The Aleut Corporation. The lands are in the vicinity of the Alaska Peninsula, and are located in: Seward Meridian, Alaska T. 49 S., R. 69 W., VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:35 Jun 09, 2008 Jkt 211001 Sec. 1; Secs. 11 to 15, inclusive; Secs. 21 to 36, inclusive. Containing approximately 14,026 acres. T. 50 S., R. 69 W., Secs. 1 to 15, inclusive; Secs. 18, 19, 22, and 24. Containing approximately 12,052 acres. T. 52 S., R. 73 W., Secs. 19 and 20; Secs. 29 to 32, inclusive. Containing 3,833.64 acres. T. 52 S., R. 74 W., Sec. 24. Containing 640 acres. T. 53 S., R. 74 W., Secs. 17 to 20, inclusive. Containing 2,501.16 acres. T. 53 S., R. 75 W., Secs. 3, 10, 11, and 13; Secs. 14, 15, and 22. Containing 4,480 acres. T. 55 S., R. 76 W., Sec. 6. Containing 53.24 acres. T. 55 S., R. 77 W., Secs. 1 to 12, inclusive; Secs. 15 to 21, inclusive; Sec. 30. Containing approximately 10,207 acres. T. 52 S., R. 78 W., Secs. 1 to 36, inclusive. Containing 22,902.48 acres. T. 55 S., R. 81 W., Secs. 7, 8, and 9; Secs. 16 to 21, inclusive; Sec. 25; Secs. 28 to 32, inclusive. Containing approximately 6,110 acres. T. 56 S., R. 81 W., Secs. 6 and 7. Containing approximately 226 acres. T. 56 S., R. 82 W., Secs. 1 to 23, inclusive; Secs. 27 to 34, inclusive. Containing approximately 17,075 acres. T. 73 S., R. 121 W., Secs. 1, 2, 11, and 12. Containing 2,560 acres. Aggregating approximately 96,667 acres. Notice of the decision will also be published four times in the Dutch Harbor Fisherman. DATES: The time limits for filing an appeal are: 1. Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely affected by the decision shall have until July 10, 2008 to file an appeal. 2. Parties receiving service of the decision by certified mail shall have 30 days from the date of receipt to file an appeal. Parties who do not file an appeal in accordance with the requirements of 43 CFR Part 4, Subpart E, shall be deemed to have waived their rights. ADDRESSES: A copy of the decision may be obtained from: Bureau of Land Management, Alaska State Office, 222 West Seventh Avenue, #13, Anchorage, Alaska 99513–7504. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Bureau of Land Management by phone PO 00000 Frm 00060 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 at 907–271–5960, or by e-mail at ak.blm.conveyance@ak.blm.gov. Persons who use a telecommunication device (TTD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877– 8330, 24 hours a day, seven days a week, to contact the Bureau of Land Management. Michael Bilancione, Land Transfer Resolution Specialist, Land Transfer Adjudication I. [FR Doc. E8–12947 Filed 6–9–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–JA–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Land Management [ES–956–1910–BJ–5043, ES–051993, Group No. 1, Rhode Island] Eastern States: Filing of Plat of Survey Bureau of Land Management, Interior. ACTION: Notice of filing of plat of survey; Rhode Island. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will file the plat of survey of the lands described below in the BLM–Eastern States, Springfield, Virginia, 30 calendar days from the date of publication in the Federal Register. Contact Information: Bureau of Land Management, 7450 Boston Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 22153. Attn: Cadastral Survey. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The survey was requested by the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the Narragansett Indian Tribe. The lands we surveyed are: Trust Lands of the Narragansett Indian Tribe, Washington County, Rhode Island; Survey of the Niles Land, designated Tract No. 8. The plat of survey represents the survey of the Niles Land, designated Tract No. 8, a portion of the lands held in trust for the Narragansett Indian Tribe in Washington County, Rhode Island, and was accepted September 23, 2003. We will place a copy of the plat we described in the open files. It will be available to the public as a matter of information. If BLM receives a protest against this survey, as shown on the plat, prior to the date of the official filing, we will stay the filing pending our consideration of the protest. We will not officially file the plat until the day after we have accepted or dismissed all protests and they have become final, including decisions on appeals. Copies of the plat will be made available upon request and prepayment of the reproduction fees. E:\FR\FM\10JNN1.SGM 10JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 112 (Tuesday, June 10, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32732-32734]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-12890]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

[FWS-R9-FHC-2008-N0085; 80221-1113-0000-L5]


Marine Mammal Protection Act; Stock Assessment Report

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of availability of draft revised marine mammal stock 
assessment report for the southern sea otter in California; request for 
comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), 
the Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has developed a draft revised 
marine mammal stock assessment report for the southern sea otter 
(Enhydra lutris nereis) stock in the State of California, which is 
available for public review and comment.

DATES: Comments must be received by September 8, 2008.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the draft revised stock assessment report for the 
southern sea otter in California are available from the Field 
Supervisor, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ventura Fish and Wildlife 
Office, 2493 Portola Road, Suite B, Ventura, CA 93003; (805) 644-1766. 
It can also be viewed in Adobe Acrobat by navigating to the species 
information page for the southern sea otter at https://www.fws.gov/
ventura.
    If you wish to submit comments on the draft revised stock 
assessment report for the southern sea otter in California, you may do 
so by any of the following methods:
    1. You may mail or hand-deliver (during normal business hours) 
written comments to the Field Supervisor, U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service, Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office, 2493 Portola Road, Suite B, 
Ventura, CA 93003.
    2. You may fax your comments to (805) 644-3958.
    3. You may send comments by electronic mail (e-mail) to 
fw8ssostock@fws.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: One of the goals of the MMPA is to ensure 
that stocks of marine mammals occurring in waters under the 
jurisdiction of the United States do not experience a level of human-
caused mortality and serious injury that is likely to cause the stock 
to be reduced below its optimum sustainable population level (OSP). OSP 
is defined as ``the number of animals which will result in the maximum 
productivity of the population or the species, keeping in mind the 
carrying capacity of the habitat and the health of the ecosystem of 
which they form a constituent element.''
    To help accomplish the goal of maintaining marine mammal stocks at 
their OSPs, section 117 of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361-1407) requires the 
Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) to prepare 
stock assessment reports for each marine mammal stock that occurs in 
waters under the jurisdiction of the United States. These stock 
assessments are to be based on the best scientific information 
available and are, therefore, prepared in consultation with established 
regional scientific review groups. Each stock assessment must include: 
(1) A description of the stock and its geographic range; (2) a minimum 
population estimate, maximum net productivity rate, and current 
population trend; (3) an estimate of human-caused mortality and serious 
injury; (4) a description of commercial fishery interactions; (5) the 
status of the stock; and (6) the potential biological removal level 
(PBR). The PBR is defined as ``the maximum number of animals, not 
including natural mortalities, that may be removed from a marine mammal 
stock while allowing that stock to reach or maintain its OSP.'' The PBR 
is the product of the minimum population estimate of the stock 
(Nmin), one-half the maximum theoretical or estimated net 
productivity rate of the stock at a small population size 
(Rmax); and a recovery factor (Fr) of between 0.1 
and 1.0, which is intended to compensate for uncertainty and unknown 
estimation errors.
    Section 117 of the MMPA also requires the Service and the NMFS to 
review the stock assessment reports: (A) At least annually for stocks 
that are specified as strategic stocks; (B) at least annually for 
stocks for which significant new information is available; and (C) at 
least once every 3 years for all other stocks.
    A strategic stock is defined in the MMPA as a marine mammal stock: 
(A) For which the level of direct human-caused mortality exceeds the 
potential biological removal level; (B) which, based on the best 
available scientific information, is declining and is likely to be 
listed as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act of 
1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), within the foreseeable 
future; or (C) which is listed as a threatened or endangered species 
under the Endangered Species Act, or is designated as depleted under 
the MMPA.
    A summary of the draft revised stock assessment report for southern 
sea otters

[[Page 32733]]

in California is presented in Table 1. The table lists the stock's 
Nmin, Rmax, Fr, PBR, annual estimated 
human-caused mortality and serious injury, and status. After 
consideration of any public comments received, the Service will revise 
the stock assessment, as appropriate. We will publish a notice of 
availability and summary of the final stock assessment, including 
responses to comments we received.
    In accordance with the MMPA, a list of the sources of information 
or public reports upon which the assessment is based is included in 
this notice.

                           Table 1.--Summary of Draft Revised Stock Assessment Report for the Southern Sea Otter in California
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                             Annual estimated average human-
                 Stock                       NMIN         RMAX          FR          PBR              caused mortality                Stock status
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Southern sea otters:
    Mainland California................        3,026         0.06          0.1            9  Unknown........................  Strategic.
    Mainland California San Nicolas               41         0.09          0.1            0  Unknown........................  Strategic.
     Island (CA).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

List of References

Bacon, C.E. 1994. An ecotoxicological comparison of organic 
contaminants in sea otters among populations in California and 
Alaska. M.S. thesis, University of California, Santa Cruz.
Bacon, C.E., W.M. Jarman, J.A. Estes, M. Simon, and R.J. Norstrom. 
1999. Comparison of organochlorine contaminants among sea otter 
(Enhydra lutris) populations in California and Alaska. Environ. 
Toxicology and Chemistry 18(3):452-458.
Bryant, H.C. 1915. Sea otters near Point Sur. California Department 
of Fish and Game Bull. 1:134-135.
Cameron, G.A., and K.A. Forney. 2000. Preliminary estimates of 
cetacean mortality in California/Oregon gillnet fisheries for 1999. 
Paper SC/S2/O24 presented to the International Whaling Commission, 
2000 (unpublished). 12 pp. Available from NMFS, Southwest Fisheries 
Science Center, P.O. Box 271, La Jolla, California, 92038, USA.
Carretta, J.V. 2001. Preliminary estimates of cetacean mortality in 
California gillnet fisheries for 2000. Paper SC/53/SM9 presented to 
the International Whaling Commission, 2001 (unpublished). 21 pp. 
Available from NMFS, Southwest Fisheries Science Center, P.O. Box 
271, La Jolla, California, 92038, USA.
Cronin, M.A., J. Bodkin, B. Bellachey, J.A. Estes, and J.C. Patton. 
1996. Mitochondrial-DNA variation among subspecies and populations 
of sea otters (Enhydra lutris). J. Mammal. 77:546-557.
Estes, J.A. 1990. Growth and equilibrium in sea otter populations. 
J. Anim. Ecol. 59:385-401.
Estes, J.A., and R.J. Jameson. 1988. A double-survey estimate for 
sighting probability of sea otters in California. J. Wildl. Manage. 
52:70-76.
Estes, J.A., B.B. Hatfield, K. Ralls, and J. Ames. 2003. Causes of 
mortality in California sea otters during periods of population 
growth and decline. Marine Mammal Science 19(1):198-216.
Forney, K.A., S.R. Benson, and G.A. Cameron. 2001. Central 
California gill net effort and bycatch of sensitive species, 1990-
1998. Pages 141-160 in Seabird Bycatch: Trends, Roadblocks, and 
Solutions, E.F. Melvin and J.K. Parrish, eds. Proceedings of an 
International Symposium of the Pacific Seabird Group, University of 
Alaska Sea Grant, Fairbanks, Alaska, 212 pp.
Hatfield, B.B., and J.A. Estes. 2000. Preliminary results of an 
evaluation of the potential threat to sea otters posed by the 
nearshore finfish trap fishery. Unpublished. 6 pp. + appendices.
Herrick, S.F., Jr., and D. Hanan. 1988. A review of California 
entangling net fisheries, 1981-1986. National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration Technical Memorandum. National Marine 
Fisheries Service. NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFC-108. 39 pp.
Jameson, R.J. 1989. Movements, home range, and territories of male 
sea otters off central California. Marine Mammal Science 5:159-172.
Jameson, R.J., and S. Jeffries. 1999. Results of the 1999 survey of 
the Washington sea otter population. Unpublished report. 5 pp.
Jameson, R.J., and S. Jeffries. 2005. Results of the 2005 survey of 
the reintroduced Washington sea otter population. Unpublished 
report. 6 pp.
Kannan, K., E. Perrotta, and N.J. Thomas. 2006. Association between 
perfluorinated compounds and pathological conditions in southern sea 
otters. Environmental Science & Technology 40:4943-4948.
Kannan, K., E. Perrotta, N.J. Thomas, and K.M. Aldous. 2007. A 
comparative analysis of polybrominated diphenyl ethers and 
polychlorinated biphenyls in southern sea otters that died of 
infectious diseases and noninfectious causes. Archives of 
Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 53:293-302.
Kannan K., K.S. Guruge, N.J. Thomas, S. Tanabe, J.P. Giesy. 1998. 
Butyltin residues in southern sea otters (Enhydra lutris nereis) 
found dead along California coastal waters. Environmental Science 
and Technology 32:1169-1175.
    Kooyman, G.L., and D.P. Costa. 1979. Effects of oiling on 
temperature regulation in sea otters. Yearly progress report, Outer 
Continental Shelf Energy Assessment Program.
    Kreuder, C., M.A. Miller, D.A. Jessup, L.J. Lowenstein, M.D. 
Harris, J.A. Ames, T.E. Carpenter, P.A. Conrad, and J.A.K. Mazet. 
2003. Patterns of mortality in southern sea otters (Enhydra lutris 
nereis) from 1998-2001. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 39(3):495-509.
    Kreuder, C., M.A. Miller, L.J. Lowenstine, P.A. Conrad, T.E. 
Carpenter, D.A. Jessup, and J.A.K. Mazet. 2005. Evaluation of 
cardiac lesions and risk factors associated with myocarditis and 
dilated cardiomyopathy in southern sea otters (Enhydra lutris 
nereis). American Journal of Veterinary Research 66:289-299.
    Laidre, K.L., R.J. Jameson, and D.P. DeMaster. 2001. An 
estimation of carrying capacity for sea otters along the California 
coast. Marine Mammal Science 17(2):294-309.
    Larson, S., R. Jameson, J. Bodkin, M. Staedler, and P. Bentzen. 
2002. Microsatellite DNA and mitochondrial DNA variation in remnant 
and translocated sea otter (Enhydra lutris) populations. J. Mammal. 
83(3):893-906.
    Mayer, K.A., M.D. Dailey, and M.A. Miller. 2003. Helminth 
parasites of the southern sea otter Enhydra lutris nereis in central 
California: abundance, distribution, and pathology. Diseases of 
Aquatic Organisms 53:77-88.
    Nakata, H., K. Kannan, L. Jing, N. Thomas, S. Tanabe, and J.P. 
Giesy. 1998. Accumulation pattern of organochlorine pesticides and 
polychlorinated biphenyls in southern sea otters (Enhydra lutris 
nereis) found stranded along coastal California, USA. Environ. Poll. 
103:45-53.
    Ralls, K., T.C. Eagle, and D.B. Siniff. 1996. Movement and 
spatial use patterns of California sea otters. Canadian Journal of 
Zoology 74:1841-1849.
    Riedman, M.L., and J.A. Estes. 1990. The sea otter (Enhydra 
lutris): behavior, ecology, and natural history. U.S. Fish and 
Wildlife Service, Biol. Rep. 90(14). 126 pp.
    Riedman, M.L., J.A. Estes, M.M. Staedler, A.A. Giles, and D.R. 
Carlson. 1994. Breeding patterns and reproductive success of 
California sea otters. J. Wildl. Manage. 58:391-399.
    Sanchez, M.S. 1992. Differentiation and variability of 
mitochondrial DNA in three sea otter, Enhydra lutris, populations. 
M.S. Thesis, University of California Santa Cruz.
    Siniff, D.B., and K. Ralls. 1991. Reproduction, survival, and 
tag loss in

[[Page 32734]]

California sea otters. Marine Mammal Science 7(3):211-229.
    Siniff, D.B., T.D. Williams, A.M. Johnson, and D.L. Garshelis. 
1982. Experiments on the response of sea otters, Enhydra lutris, to 
oil contamination. Biol. Conserv. 2: 261-272.
    Taylor, B.L., M. Scott, J. Heyning, and J. Barlow. 2002. 
Suggested guidelines for recovery factors for endangered marine 
mammals. Unpublished report submitted to the Pacific Scientific 
Review Group. 7 pp.
    Tinker, M.T., G. Bentall, and J.A. Estes. 2008. Food limitation 
leads to behavioral diversification and dietary specialization in 
sea otters. PNAS 105:560-565.
    Tinker, M.T., J.A. Estes, K. Ralls, T.M. Williams, D. Jessup, 
and D.P. Costa. 2006. Population Dynamics and Biology of the 
California Sea Otter (Enhydra lutris nereis) at the Southern End of 
its Range. MMS OCS Study 2006-007. Coastal Research Center, Marine 
Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, 
California. MMS Cooperative Agreement Number 14-35-0001-31063.
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2003. Final Revised Recovery 
Plan for the Southern Sea Otter (Enhydra lutris nereis). Portland, 
Oregon. xi + 165 pp.
    Wendell, F.E., R.A. Hardy, and J.A. Ames. 1986. An assessment of 
the accidental take of sea otters, Enhydra lutris, in gill and 
trammel nets. California Department of Fish and Game, Mar. Res. 
Tech. Rep. 1991. Geographic variation in sea otters, Enhydra lutris. 
J. Mammal. 72(1):22-36.
    Wilson, D.E., M.A. Bogan, R.L. Brownell, Jr., A.M. Burdin, and 
M.K. Maminov. 1991. Geographic variation in sea otters, Enhydra 
lutris. J. Mammal. 72(1):22-36.

    Dated: June 3, 2008.
H. Dale Hall,
Director, Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. E8-12890 Filed 6-9-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.