Declaratory Judgments-Gift Tax Determinations, 32503-32508 [E8-12894]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 111 / Monday, June 9, 2008 / Proposed Rules
squad is not a part of City M’s police or fire
departments. The director’s vehicle is a
sedan which is painted with insignia and
words identifying the vehicle as being owned
by the City’s rescue squad. C, when not on
a regular shift, is on call at all times. The
City’s official policy regarding clearly marked
public safety officer vehicles prohibits
personal use (other than for commuting) of
the vehicle outside of the limits of the public
safety officer’s obligation to respond to an
emergency. When not using the vehicle to
respond to emergencies, City M authorizes C
to use the vehicle only for commuting,
personal errands on the way between work
and home, and personal errands within the
limits of C’s obligation to respond to
emergencies. With respect to these
authorized uses, the vehicle is not subject to
the substantiation requirements of section
274(d) and the value of these uses is not
includable in C’s gross income.
(l) Definitions. For purposes of section
274(d) and this section, the terms
automobile and vehicle have the same
meanings as prescribed in §§ 1.61–
21(d)(1)(ii) and 1.61–21(e)(2),
respectively. Also, for purposes of
section 274(d) and this section, the
terms employer, employee and personal
use have the same meanings as
prescribed in § 1.274–6T(e).
(m) * * * However, paragraph (j)(3)
of this section applies to expenses paid
or incurred after September 30, 2002,
and paragraph (k) applies to clearly
marked public safety officer vehicles, as
defined in 1.274–5(k)(3), only with
respect to uses occurring after January 1,
2009.
Par. 4. Section 1.274–5T is revised by
amending paragraphs (k) and (l) as
follows:
§ 1.274–5T Substantiation requirements
(temporary).
*
*
*
*
*
(k) and (l) [Reserved]. For further
guidance, see §§ 1.274–5(k) and (l).
*
*
*
*
*
Par. 5. Section 1.280F–6 is amended
by revising paragraph (b)(2)(ii) to read:
§ 1.280F–6
Special rules and definitions.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) Exception. The term ‘‘listed
property’’ does not include any vehicle
that is a qualified nonpersonal use
vehicle as defined in section 274(i) and
§ 1.274–5(k).
*
*
*
*
*
Steven Miller,
Acting Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. E8–12805 Filed 6–6–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:31 Jun 06, 2008
Jkt 214001
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 301
[REG–143716–04]
RIN 1545-BD67
Declaratory Judgments—Gift Tax
Determinations
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
and notice of public hearing.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document contains
proposed regulations under section
7477 of the Internal Revenue Code
(Code) regarding petitions filed with the
United States Tax Court for declaratory
judgments as to the valuation of gifts.
Changes to the applicable law were
made by section 506(c)(1) of the
Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 (TRA). The
proposed regulations primarily affect
individuals who are donors of gifts. The
proposed regulations provide rules for
determining whether a donor may
petition the Tax Court with respect to
the value of a gift, including guidance
regarding the definition of ‘‘exhaustion
of administrative remedies.’’ This
document also provides a notice of a
public hearing on these proposed
regulations.
Written and electronic comments
must be received by September 8, 2008.
Outlines of topics to be discussed at the
public hearing scheduled for October
16, 2008, must be received by
September 11, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to:
CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–143716–04), room
5203, Internal Revenue Service, P.O.
Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington, DC 20044. Submissions
may be hand delivered Monday through
Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and
4 p.m. to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–143716–
04), Courier’s Desk, Internal Revenue
Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC. Alternatively,
taxpayers may submit electronic
comments via the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov
(IRS REG–143716–04). The public
hearing will be held in the auditorium
of the Internal Revenue Building, 1111
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning the proposed regulations,
Juli Ro Kim or George Masnik, (202)
622–3090; concerning submissions of
comments, the hearing, and/or to be
placed on the building access list to
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
32503
attend the hearing, Kelly Banks at (202)
622–7180 (not toll-free numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Gift tax is computed by determining
a tax on the total of the gifts deemed
made by the donor in the year for which
the return is filed (the current calendar
year) plus the total of that donor’s gifts
in prior years (prior taxable gifts). The
tax so computed is then reduced by the
tax that would have been payable on the
prior taxable gifts, had the tax rate for
the current taxable year applied to the
prior taxable gifts. The result (after
taking into account the applicable credit
amount under section 2505) is the gift
tax on the gifts in the current calendar
year. Similarly, the estate tax is
computed by determining a tax on the
sum of the value of the decedent’s
taxable estate and the value of certain
taxable gifts (adjusted taxable gifts)
made by the decedent prior to death.
The tax computed is then reduced by
the gift tax that would have been
payable on the adjusted taxable gifts,
had the estate tax rate applied to the
adjusted taxable gifts. The result (after
allowing for various credits) is the estate
tax on the taxable estate.
The Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997
(TRA) (Pub. L. 105–34, 111 Stat. 855),
the Internal Revenue Service
Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998
(Pub. L. 105–206, 112 Stat. 685), and the
Tax and Trade Relief Extension Act of
1998 (Pub. L. 105–277, 112 Stat. 2681–
909), (collectively, the 1998 Acts),
enacted or amended sections 2001(f),
2504(c), 6501(c)(9), and 7477, effective
in the case of gifts made after August 5,
1997, to provide a degree of finality
regarding the valuation of lifetime gifts
for gift and estate tax purposes.
Congress was concerned that the prior
regime resulted in the resolution of
controversies based on stale evidence,
and necessitated the retention of records
for unduly long periods of time. H.R.
Rep. No. 105–148 at 359 (1997).
Under sections 6501(a) and (c)(9) as
amended by TRA and the 1998 Acts,
and the applicable regulations, if a
transfer of property is adequately
disclosed on a gift tax return, then the
period of limitations for assessment of
gift tax with regard to that transfer will
commence to run on the date the return
is filed. Once the time for assessment of
gift tax has expired for a transfer made
after August 5, 1997, the value of the gift
as ‘‘finally determined’’ for gift tax
purposes, as defined in section 2001(f),
is the value to be used for purposes of
determining prior taxable gifts in
computing the gift tax liability in
subsequent years under section 2504(c),
E:\FR\FM\09JNP1.SGM
09JNP1
32504
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 111 / Monday, June 9, 2008 / Proposed Rules
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
and for purposes of determining
adjusted taxable gifts in computing the
estate tax liability under section 2001(f).
Under §§ 20.2001–1(b) and 25.2504–
2(b), this finality rule applies with
respect to all issues that might be raised
with respect to the transfer, including
valuation issues and legal issues. The
amount of a gift is finally determined if:
(1) The amount is shown on a gift tax
return and the IRS does not contest the
amount before the period for assessing
gift tax expires; (2) before the period for
assessing gift tax expires, the amount is
adjusted by the IRS and the taxpayer
does not contest the adjusted amount;
or, (3) the amount is determined by a
court or pursuant to a settlement
agreement between the taxpayer and the
IRS.
Section 7477 was enacted as part of
TRA in conjunction with these other
provisions to provide a declaratory
judgment procedure pursuant to which
taxpayers may contest in the United
States Tax Court an IRS determination
regarding the value of a gift. See H.R.
Conf. Rep. No. 105–220, at 407–408
(1997). In the absence of section 7477,
without an actual gift tax deficiency, a
taxpayer would be unable to petition the
Tax Court to contest the determination
or, without an overpayment of tax, file
a claim for refund or bring suit for
refund in Federal court. This could
occur, for example, if an increase in gift
tax determined under section 2502 is
offset by the taxpayer’s applicable credit
amount under section 2505(a), so that
no additional tax would be assessed as
a result of the valuation increase. Thus,
without section 7477, such a taxpayer
would be left without any way to
challenge the IRS determination, even
though, upon the expiration of the
statute of limitations, that determination
would become binding for purposes of
calculating the cumulative gift tax on all
future gifts of that taxpayer, as well as
the taxpayer’s estate tax liability.
Explanation of Provisions
Under section 7477(a), the donor may
contest an IRS determination of the
amount of a gift. Specifically, the donor
may petition the Tax Court for a
declaratory judgment, provided that
certain requirements are met. Section
7477(a) applies in the case of an actual
controversy involving a determination
by the IRS regarding the value of a gift
that is shown on the gift tax return or
disclosed on the gift tax return or in a
statement attached to that return.
These proposed regulations provide a
procedure for pursuing a declaratory
judgment in the Tax Court pursuant to
section 7477 in situations where, prior
to the enactment of that section, the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:31 Jun 06, 2008
Jkt 214001
taxpayer would have had no remedy to
challenge the IRS determination.
Specifically, the procedure provided by
these proposed regulations applies only
in those situations where an adjustment
by the IRS does not result in a gift tax
deficiency or refund. In situations
where the IRS adjustment results in a
proposed tax deficiency or a potential
refund, taxpayers should not follow the
procedures in these proposed
regulations but should continue to
follow the procedures already in place
to dispute a deficiency or claim a
refund. These procedures more
efficiently address and resolve disputes
involving a deficiency or refund.
The first requirement for eligibility for
relief under section 7477 is that the
transfer must be shown or disclosed ‘‘on
the return of tax imposed by chapter
12,’’ that is, a Federal gift tax return, or
on a statement attached to the return.
Under the proposed regulations, the
return of tax imposed by chapter 12 is
defined as the last gift tax return for the
calendar year filed on or before the due
date of the return, including extensions
granted (if any), or if a timely return is
not filed, the first gift tax return for the
calendar year filed after the due date.
If the transfer is not shown or
disclosed on the gift tax return, or on a
statement attached to the return, a
declaratory judgment under section
7477 is not available. If, however, a
transfer is disclosed on the return or on
a statement attached to the return, this
eligibility requirement for the section
7477 procedure is satisfied, even if the
transfer is disclosed in a manner that
does not satisfy the requirements of
section 6501(c)(9) and § 301.6501(c)–
1(e) or (f) pertaining to adequate
disclosure sufficient to commence the
running of the period of limitations on
assessment. There may be no
compelling reason for the IRS to
examine a transaction that is disclosed
on the return but not in a manner
sufficient to trigger the running of the
statute of limitations, because the time
period for adjusting the value of the gift
is not limited by the statute of
limitations for assessments. The
Treasury Department and the IRS,
however, recognize that in many cases
the IRS may prefer to
contemporaneously resolve the transfer
tax treatment of that transaction, even
though the standards for adequate
disclosure with regard to that
transaction have not been satisfied by
the donor. Thus, the IRS in its
discretion may make a determination
regarding the transfer and place the
transfer in controversy by mailing a
notice of determination of value used in
unagreed cases (Letter 3569) with regard
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
to that transfer. The ability to place a
transfer that is not adequately disclosed
in controversy is consistent with the
Congressional purpose in enacting the
TRA provisions, noted previously, to
promote the early resolution of gift tax
controversies based on
contemporaneous evidence. The IRS
and Treasury Department emphasize
that the issuance of a Letter 3569 with
regard to such a transfer does not
constitute a determination by the IRS
that the transfer was adequately
disclosed or otherwise cause the period
of limitations on assessment to
commence to run with respect to that
transfer.
Alternatively, the IRS may in its
discretion decide not to put a transfer in
controversy at that time (whether or not
any other transfer reported on a gift tax
return is then put into controversy). If
the IRS decides not to put the transfer
into controversy at that time, the IRS
will not issue a Letter 3569 (described
in this preamble) (or the Letter 3569
issued will not address that transfer),
the declaratory judgment procedure will
not be available for that transfer, and the
limitations period applicable to that
transfer will remain open.
Section 7477 also requires an actual
controversy with respect to a
determination by the IRS of the value of
the disclosed transfer. Thus, the donor
is not permitted to bypass the
examination process and unilaterally
seek a declaratory judgment. Generally,
the IRS must propose adjustments with
which the donor disagrees. Accordingly,
the proposed regulations provide that,
in order for the section 7477 declaratory
judgment procedure to be available to a
donor, the IRS must first make a
determination regarding the gift tax
treatment of the transfer that results in
an actual controversy in a situation
where the adjustments do not result in
a gift tax deficiency or refund. This IRS
determination is deemed to be made by
the mailing of a Letter 3569 to notify the
taxpayer of the adjustments proposed by
the IRS. The mailing of this letter to the
donor is the prerequisite for filing a
petition with the Tax Court requesting
a declaratory judgment under section
7477.
Section 7477 also requires that the
donor’s pleading seeking a declaratory
judgment under section 7477 must be
filed with the Tax Court before the 91st
day after the mailing of the Letter 3569
by the IRS. The pleading must be in the
form of a petition subject to Tax Court
Rule 211(d).
Finally, section 7477(b)(2) provides
that the Tax Court may not issue a
declaratory judgment under section
7477 unless it first determines that the
E:\FR\FM\09JNP1.SGM
09JNP1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 111 / Monday, June 9, 2008 / Proposed Rules
donor has exhausted all administrative
remedies available to the donor within
the IRS with respect to the controversy.
Tax Court Rule 211(d) requires that the
petition in an action under section 7477
must contain a statement that the
petitioner has exhausted all
administrative remedies within the IRS.
See also Tax Court Rule 210(c)(4).
Accordingly, the proposed regulations
set forth the administrative remedies
available to the donor with respect to a
determination by the IRS of the amount
of a gift, and the circumstances in which
the IRS will not contest the donor’s
allegation that administrative remedies
have been exhausted. The
administrative remedies are intended to
parallel those applicable in the case of
an asserted gift tax deficiency.
Specifically, the proposed regulations
provide that the IRS will not contest the
donor’s allegation that the donor’s
administrative remedies have been
exhausted if: (1) The donor requests
Appeals consideration in writing within
30 calendar days after the mailing date
of a notice of preliminary determination
of value (Preliminary Determination
Letter) from the IRS, or by such later
date for responding to the Preliminary
Determination Letter as determined
pursuant to IRS procedures; (2) the
donor participates fully in the Appeals
consideration process, including
without limitation timely submitting all
additional information related to the
amount of the gift that is requested by
the IRS in connection with (or as a
follow-up to) the Appeals consideration
process; and (3) the IRS mails to the
donor the Letter 3569, which will notify
the donor of the proposed adjustments
and of the donor’s right to contest the
determination by filing a petition for
declaratory judgment with the Tax
Court before the 91st day after the date
of mailing the Letter 3569. The Letter
3569 usually will be issued by the
Appeals office. However, because
section 7477 requires that the Tax Court,
rather than the IRS, determines whether
the donor has exhausted all
administrative remedies, the donor
generally will be sent a Letter 3569 in
those situations where the donor does
not respond to the Preliminary
Determination Letter, or expressly
declines to participate in the Appeals
process. If a donor does not respond to
a Preliminary Determination Letter, or if
a donor does not participate in the
Appeals process, the IRS will consider
the donor to have failed to exhaust
administrative remedies. In such cases,
the IRS may challenge any allegation in
the donor’s petition for a section 7477
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:31 Jun 06, 2008
Jkt 214001
declaratory judgment that the donor has
exhausted all administrative remedies.
The proposed regulations also provide
that the IRS will not contest the donor’s
allegation that all administrative
remedies have been exhausted in certain
circumstances where the abovedescribed process is not followed by the
IRS. (For example, the IRS might mail
a Letter 3569 to the donor in the absence
of these other preliminary steps where,
because of the imminent expiration of
the applicable statute of limitations, the
IRS believes there is not sufficient time
to issue a Preliminary Determination
Letter to allow Appeals consideration.)
If the IRS’s decision not to issue a
Preliminary Determination Letter is not
due to the donor’s actions or failure to
act, the IRS will not contend that the
donor failed to exhaust all
administrative remedies, provided that
the donor fully participates in the
Appeals consideration process offered
by the IRS during the pendancy of the
Tax Court proceeding. In this regard, the
IRS and Treasury Department do not
view the reference to section 7477
contained in § 601.106(a)(2)(iv) of the
Statement of Procedural Rules as
currently in effect and Rev. Proc. 87–24
(1987–1 CB 720) as prohibiting Appeals’
jurisdiction to consider docketed cases
under current section 7477. The version
of section 7477 referenced in those
items was repealed prior to the
enactment of the current section 7477 as
part of the TRA.
The proposed regulations confirm that
the donor is not required to consent to
an extension of the time within which
gift tax with respect to the transfer at
issue may be assessed in order to
exhaust the donor’s administrative
remedies, and that the failure to consent
to such an extension will not be taken
into account for this purpose. See
section 7430(b)(1) and Minahan v.
Commissioner, 88 T.C. 492 (1987),
considering this issue in the context of
section 7430(b)(1) prior to amendment
by Public Law 104–168 (110 Stat. 1452).
Under the proposed regulations, a
donor may petition for a declaratory
judgment with respect to disputes
regarding valuation and/or other related
issues. This is consistent with
§§ 20.2001–1(b) and 25.2504–2(b)
providing that, once the gift tax statute
of limitations has expired with respect
to a transfer, the IRS is precluded from
making any adjustments with respect to
that transfer for purposes of determining
prior taxable gifts or adjusted taxable
gifts, regardless of whether the
adjustment involves a valuation issue or
a legal issue pertaining to the proper
interpretation of the gift tax law. See
also § 301.6501(c)–1(f)(5) providing a
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
32505
similar rule regarding transfers that are
incomplete gifts but are reported as
completed gifts. Accordingly, even if a
gift tax adjustment does not generate
any additional gift tax liability, the IRS
nevertheless is required to propose the
adjustment (and to take all other
necessary steps) in order to challenge
the return as filed within the statutory
limitations period, regardless of the
nature of the issue presented. Sections
2001(f), 2504(c), 6501(c)(9) and 7477, as
enacted or amended by TRA and the
1998 Acts, provide an integrated
statutory regime pursuant to which
taxpayers are accorded finality with
respect to adequately disclosed transfers
(except for transfers that are reported as
incomplete gifts), while the IRS is
afforded the reasonable opportunity to
identify in a timely manner returns that
present issues that merit further
examination. The section 7477
declaratory judgment procedure is a
necessary part of this regime because it
provides a mechanism to finally resolve
any disputed adjustments in
circumstances where there is no tax
assessment and thus the donor would
otherwise be unable to satisfy the
jurisdictional requirements for any
judicial resolution. The IRS and
Treasury Department believe it is
appropriate for the declaratory judgment
mechanism under section 7477, when
available in circumstances where there
is no deficiency or refund, to be
available for all adjustments regardless
of whether the basis for those
adjustments is factual, legal, or both.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this notice
of proposed rulemaking is not a
significant regulatory action as defined
in Executive Order 12866. Therefore, a
regulatory assessment is not required. It
also has been determined that section
553(b) of the Administrative Procedure
Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply
to these regulations and, because these
regulations do not impose a collection
of information on small entities, the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
chapter 6) does not apply. Pursuant to
section 7805(f) of the Code, this
regulation has been submitted to the
Small Business Administration for
comment on the impact on small
business.
Comments and Public Hearing
Before these proposed regulations are
adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to any
written (a signed original and eight (8)
copies) or electronic comments that are
submitted timely to the IRS. The IRS
and the Treasury Department request
E:\FR\FM\09JNP1.SGM
09JNP1
32506
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 111 / Monday, June 9, 2008 / Proposed Rules
comments on the clarity of the proposed
regulations and how they may be made
easier to understand. All comments will
be available for public inspection and
copying.
A public hearing has been scheduled
for October 16, 2008 at 10 a.m. in the
auditorium of the Internal Revenue
Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC. In addition, all
visitors must present photo
identification to enter the building.
Because of access restrictions, visitors
will not be admitted beyond the
immediate entrance area more than 30
minutes before the hearing starts. For
information about having your name
placed on the building access list to
attend the hearing, see the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble. The rules of 26 CFR
601.601(a)(3) apply to the hearing.
Persons who wish to present oral
comments at the hearing must submit
comments by September 8, 2008, and
submit an outline of the topics to be
discussed and the time to be devoted to
each topic (signed original and eight (8)
copies) by September 8, 2008.
A period of 10 minutes will be
allotted to each person for making
comments. An agenda showing the
scheduling of the speakers will be
prepared after the deadline for receiving
outlines has passed. Copies of the
agenda will be available free of charge
at the hearing.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these
proposed regulations is Juli Ro Kim,
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries),
IRS. Other personnel from the IRS and
the Treasury Department participated in
their development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 301
Employment taxes, Estate taxes,
Excise taxes, Gift taxes, Income taxes,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Proposed Amendments to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 301 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
PART 301—PROCEDURE AND
ADMINISTRATION
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 301 continues to read in part as
follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Par. 2. Section 301.7477–1 is revised
to read as follows:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:31 Jun 06, 2008
Jkt 214001
§ 301.7477–1 Declaratory judgments
relating to the value of certain gifts for gift
tax purposes.
(a) In general. If the requirements
contained in paragraph (d) of this
section are satisfied, a donor may
petition the United States Tax Court
under section 7477 for a declaratory
judgment regarding the amount of one
or more of the donor’s gifts during the
calendar year for Federal gift tax
purposes, if the adjustment(s) proposed
by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
will not result in any deficiency in or
refund of the donor’s gift tax liability for
that calendar year.
(b) Declaratory judgment procedure—
(1) In general. If a donor does not
resolve a dispute with the IRS
concerning the value of a transfer for gift
tax purposes at the Examination level,
the donor will be sent a notice of
preliminary determination of value, or
such other document as may be utilized
by the IRS for this purpose from time to
time, but referred to in this section as a
Preliminary Determination Letter,
inviting the donor to file a formal
protest and to request consideration by
the appropriate IRS Appeals office. See
§§ 601.105 and 601.106 of this chapter.
Subsequently, the donor will be sent a
notice of determination of value (Letter
3569, or such other document as may be
utilized from time to time by the IRS for
this purpose in cases where no
deficiency or refund would result, but
referred to in this section as Letter 3569)
if—
(i) The donor requests Appeals
consideration in writing within 30
calendar days after the mailing date of
the Preliminary Determination Letter, or
by such later date as determined
pursuant to IRS procedures, and the
matter is not resolved by Appeals;
(ii) The donor does not request
Appeals consideration within the time
provided in paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this
section; or
(iii) The IRS does not issue a
Preliminary Determination Letter in
circumstances described in paragraph
(d)(3)(ii) of this section.
(2) Notice of determination of value.
The Letter 3569 will notify the donor of
the adjustment(s) proposed by the IRS,
and will advise the donor that the donor
may contest the determination made by
the IRS by filing a petition with the Tax
Court before the 91st day after the date
on which the Letter 3569 was mailed to
the donor by the IRS.
(3) Tax Court petition. If the donor
does not file a timely petition with the
Tax Court, the IRS determination as set
forth in the Letter 3569 will be
considered the final determination of
value, as defined in sections 2504(c) and
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2001(f). If the donor files a timely
petition with the Tax Court, the Tax
Court will determine whether the donor
has exhausted available administrative
remedies. Under section 7477, the Tax
Court is not authorized to issue a
declaratory judgment unless the Tax
Court finds that the donor has
exhausted all administrative remedies
within the IRS. See paragraph (d)(3) of
this section regarding the exhaustion of
administrative remedies.
(c) Adjustments subject to declaratory
judgment procedure. The declaratory
judgment procedures set forth in this
section apply to adjustments involving
all issues relating to the transfer,
including without limitation valuation
issues and legal issues involving the
interpretation and application of the gift
tax law.
(d) Requirements for declaratory
judgment procedure. The declaratory
judgment procedure provided in this
section is available to a donor with
respect to a transfer only if the
requirements of paragraphs (d)(1)
through (4) of this section with regard
to that transfer are satisfied.
(1) Reporting. The transfer is shown
or disclosed on the return of tax
imposed by chapter 12 for the calendar
year during which the transfer was
made or on a statement attached to such
return. For purposes of this paragraph,
the term return of tax imposed by
chapter 12 means the last gift tax return
(Form 709, ‘‘United States Gift (and
Generation-skipping Transfer) Tax
Return,’’ or such other form as may be
utilized for this purpose from time to
time by the IRS) for the calendar year
filed on or before the due date of the
return, including extensions granted if
any, or, if a timely return is not filed,
the first gift tax return for that calendar
year filed after the due date. For
purposes of satisfying this requirement,
the transfer need not be reported in a
manner that constitutes adequate
disclosure within the meaning of
§ 301.6501(c)–1(e) or (f) (and thus for
which, under §§ 20.2001–1(b) and
25.2504–2(b) of this chapter, the period
will not expire during which the IRS
may adjust the value of the gift). The
issuance of a Letter 3569 with regard to
a transfer disclosed on a return does not
constitute a determination by the IRS
that the transfer was adequately
disclosed, or otherwise cause the period
of limitations on assessment to
commence to run with respect to that
transfer. In addition, in the case of a
transfer that is shown on the return, the
IRS may in its discretion choose to defer
until a later time making a
determination with regard to such
transfer. If the IRS exercises its
E:\FR\FM\09JNP1.SGM
09JNP1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 111 / Monday, June 9, 2008 / Proposed Rules
discretion to defer such determination
in that case, the transfer will not be
addressed in the Letter 3569 (if any)
sent to the donor currently, and the
donor is not yet eligible for a declaratory
judgment with regard to that transfer
under section 7477.
(2) IRS determination and actual
controversy. The IRS makes a
determination regarding the gift tax
treatment of the transfer that results in
an actual controversy. The IRS makes a
determination that results in an actual
controversy with respect to a transfer by
mailing a Letter 3569 to the donor,
thereby notifying the donor of the
adjustment(s) proposed by the IRS with
regard to that transfer and of the donor’s
rights under section 7477.
(3) Exhaustion of administrative
remedies—(i) In general—Appeals office
consideration. The Tax Court
determines that the donor has exhausted
all administrative remedies available
within the IRS for resolving the
controversy. For purposes of this
section, the IRS will consider a donor to
have exhausted all administrative
remedies if, prior to filing a petition in
Tax Court (except as provided in
paragraph (d)(3)(ii) of this section), the
donor, or a qualified representative of
the donor described in § 601.502 of this
chapter, timely requests consideration
by Appeals and participates fully in the
Appeals consideration process,
including, without limitation, timely
submitting all information related to the
transfer that is requested by the IRS in
connection with the Appeals
consideration. A timely request for
consideration by Appeals is a written
request from the donor for Appeals
consideration made within 30 days after
the mailing date of the Preliminary
Determination Letter, or by such later
date for responding to the Preliminary
Determination Letter as is agreed to
between the donor and the IRS.
(ii) No Preliminary Determination
Letter issued. If the IRS does not issue
a Preliminary Determination Letter to
the donor prior to the issuance of Letter
3569, the IRS nevertheless will consider
the donor to have exhausted all
administrative remedies within the IRS
for purposes of section 7477 upon the
issuance of the Letter 3569, provided
that—
(A) The IRS decision not to issue the
Preliminary Determination Letter was
not due to actions or inactions of the
donor (such as a failure to supply
requested information or a current
mailing address to the Area Director
having jurisdiction over the tax matter);
and
(B) The donor, or a qualified
representative of the donor described in
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:31 Jun 06, 2008
Jkt 214001
§ 601.502 of this chapter, after the filing
of a petition in Tax Court for a
declaratory judgment pursuant to
section 7477, fully participates (within
the meaning of paragraph (d)(3)(i) of this
section) in the Appeals office
consideration when offered by the IRS
while the case is in docketed status.
(iii) Failure to agree to extension of
time for assessment. The donor has the
right to agree (or to decline to agree) to
an extension of the time under section
6501 within which gift tax with respect
to the transfer at issue may be assessed.
For purposes of section 7477, the
donor’s refusal to agree to such an
extension will not be considered by the
IRS to constitute a failure by the donor
to exhaust all administrative remedies
available to the donor within the IRS.
(4) Timely petition in Tax Court. The
donor files a pleading with the Tax
Court requesting a declaratory judgment
under section 7477. This pleading must
be filed with the Tax Court before the
91st day after the date of mailing of the
Letter 3569 by the IRS to the donor. The
pleading must be in the form of a
petition subject to Tax Court Rule
211(d).
(e) Examples. The following examples
illustrate the provisions of this section.
These examples, however, do not
address any other situations that might
affect the Tax Court’s jurisdiction over
the proceeding. The examples read as
follows:
Example 1. Exhaustion of administrative
remedies. The donor (D) timely files a Form
709, ‘‘United States Gift (and GenerationSkipping Transfer) Tax Return,’’ on which D
reports D’s completed gift of closely held
stock. After conducting an examination, the
IRS concludes that the value of the stock on
the date of the gift is greater than the value
reported on the return. Because the amount
of D’s available applicable credit amount
under section 2505 is sufficient to cover any
resulting tax liability, no gift tax deficiency
will result from the adjustment. D is unable
to resolve the matter with the IRS examiner.
The IRS sends a notice of preliminary
determination of value (Preliminary
Determination Letter) to D informing D of the
proposed adjustment. D, within 30 calendar
days after the mailing date of the letter,
submits a written request for Appeals
consideration. During the Appeals process, D
provides to the Appeals office all additional
information (if any) requested by Appeals
relevant to the determination of the value of
the stock in a timely fashion. The Appeals
office and D are unable to reach an agreement
regarding the value of the stock as of the date
of the gift. The Appeals office sends D a
notice of determination of value (Letter
3569). For purposes of section 7477, the IRS
will consider D to have exhausted all
available administrative remedies within the
IRS, and thus will not contest the allegation
in D’s petition that D has exhausted all such
administrative remedies.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
32507
Example 2. Exhaustion of administrative
remedies. Assume the same facts as in
Example 1, except that D does not timely
request consideration by Appeals after
receiving the Preliminary Determination
Letter. A Letter 3569 is mailed to D more
than 30 days after the mailing of the
Preliminary Determination Letter and prior to
the expiration of the period of limitations for
assessment of gift tax. D timely files a
petition in Tax Court pursuant to section
7477. After the case is docketed, D requests
Appeals consideration. In this situation,
because D did not respond timely to the
Preliminary Determination Letter with a
written request for Appeals consideration,
the IRS will not consider D to have exhausted
all administrative remedies available within
the IRS for purposes of section 7477 prior to
filing the petition in Tax Court, and thus may
contest any allegation in D’s petition that D
has exhausted all such administrative
remedies.
Example 3. Exhaustion of administrative
remedies. D timely files a Form 709 on which
D reports D’s completed gifts of interests in
a family limited partnership. After
conducting an examination, the IRS proposes
to adjust the value of the gift as reported on
the return. No gift tax deficiency will result
from the adjustments, however, because D
has a sufficient amount of available
applicable credit amount under section 2505.
D declines to consent to extend the time for
the assessment of gift tax with respect to the
gifts at issue. Because of the pending
expiration of the period of limitation on
assessment with respect to the gifts, the IRS
determines that there is not adequate time for
Appeals consideration. Accordingly, the IRS
mails to D a Letter 3569, even though a
Preliminary Determination Letter had not
first been issued to D. D timely files a
petition in Tax Court pursuant to section
7477. After the case is docketed in Tax Court,
D is offered the opportunity for Appeals to
consider any dispute regarding the
determination and participates fully in the
Appeals consideration process. However, the
Appeals office and D are unable to resolve
the issue. The IRS will consider D to have
exhausted all administrative remedies
available within the IRS, and thus will not
assert that D has not exhausted all such
administrative remedies.
Example 4. Legal issue. In 2006, D transfers
nonvested stock options to a trust for the
benefit of D’s child. D timely files a Form 709
reporting the transfer as a completed gift for
Federal gift tax purposes and complies with
the adequate disclosure requirements for
purposes of triggering the commencement of
the applicable statute of limitations. Pursuant
to § 301.6501(c)–1(f)(5), adequate disclosure
of a transfer that is reported as a completed
gift on the Form 709 will commence the
running of the period of limitations for
assessment of gift tax on D, even if the
transfer is ultimately determined to be an
incomplete gift for purposes of § 25.2511–2 of
this chapter. After conducting an
examination, the IRS concurs with the
reported valuation of the stock options, but
concludes that the reported transfer is not a
completed gift for Federal gift tax purposes.
D is unable to resolve the matter with the IRS
E:\FR\FM\09JNP1.SGM
09JNP1
32508
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 111 / Monday, June 9, 2008 / Proposed Rules
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
examiner. Assuming that the IRS mails to D
a Letter 3569 with regard to this transfer, and
that D complies with the administrative
procedures set forth in this section, including
the exhaustion of all administrative remedies
available within the IRS, then D may file a
petition for declaratory judgment with the
Tax Court pursuant to section 7477.
Example 5. Transfers in controversy. On
April 16, 2007, D timely files a Form 709 on
which D reports gifts made in 2006 of
fractional interests in certain real property
and of interests in a family limited
partnership (FLP). However, although the
gifts are disclosed on the return, the return
does not contain information sufficient to
constitute adequate disclosure under
§ 301.6501(c)–1(e) or (f) for purposes of the
application of the statute of limitations on
assessment of gift tax with respect to the
reported gifts. The IRS conducts an
examination and concludes that the value of
both the interests in the real property and the
FLP interests on the date(s) of the transfers
are greater than the values reported on the
return. No gift tax deficiency will result from
the adjustments because D has a sufficient
amount of remaining applicable credit
amount under section 2505. However, D does
not agree with the adjustments. The IRS
sends a Preliminary Determination Letter to
D informing D of the proposed adjustments
in the value of the reported gifts. D, within
30 calendar days after the mailing date of the
letter, submits a written request for Appeals
consideration. The Appeals office and D are
unable to reach an agreement regarding the
value of any of the gifts. In the exercise of
its discretion, the IRS decides to resolve
currently only the value of the real property
interests, and to defer the resolution of the
value of the FLP interests. On May 28, 2009,
the Appeals office sends D a Letter 3569
addressing only the value of the gifts of
interests in the real property. Because none
of the gifts reported on the return filed on
April 16, 2007, were adequately disclosed for
purposes of § 301.6501(c)–1(e) or (f), the
period of limitations during which the IRS
may adjust the value of those gifts has not
begun to run. Accordingly, the Letter 3569 is
timely mailed. If D timely files a petition in
Tax Court pursuant to section 7477 with
regard to the value of the interests in the real
property, then, assuming the other
requirements of section 7477 are satisfied
with regard to those interests, the Tax Court’s
declaratory judgment, once it becomes final,
will determine the value of the gifts of the
interests in the real property. Because the IRS
has not yet put the gift tax value of the
interests in the FLP into controversy, the
procedure under section 7477 is not available
with regard to those gifts.
Par. 3. Section 301.7477–2 is added to
read as follows:
§ 301.7477–2
Effective date.
Section 301.7477–1 applies to civil
proceedings described in section 7477
filed in the United States Tax Court on
or after the date these regulations are
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:31 Jun 06, 2008
Jkt 214001
published as final regulations in the
Federal Register.
Linda E. Stiff,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. E8–12894 Filed 6–6–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 721
[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2006–0898; FRL–8351–4]
RIN 2070–AB27
Proposed Significant New Use Rules
on Certain Chemical Substances
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing significant
new use rules (SNURs) under section
5(a)(2) of the Toxic Substances Control
Act (TSCA) for two chemical substances
which were the subject of
premanufacture notices (PMNs). The
two substances are dodecandioic acid,
1, 12-dihydrazide (CAS No. 4080–98–2;
PMNs P–01–759 and P–05–555) and
thiophene, 2,5-dibromo-3-hexyl- (CAS
No. 116971–11–0; PMN P–07–283). This
action would require persons who
intend to manufacture, import, or
process either of these two substances
for an activity that is designated as a
significant new use by this proposed
rule to notify EPA at least 90 days before
commencing that activity. The required
notification would provide EPA with
the opportunity to evaluate the intended
use and, if necessary, to prohibit or limit
that activity before it occurs.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before July 9, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2006–0898, by
one of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Document Control Office
(7407M), Office of Pollution Prevention
and Toxics (OPPT), Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460–
0001.
• Hand Delivery: OPPT Document
Control Office (DCO), EPA East Bldg.,
Rm. 6428, 1201 Constitution Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC. Attention: Docket ID
Number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2006–0898.
The DCO is open from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
holidays. The telephone number for the
DCO is (202) 564–8930. Such deliveries
are only accepted during the DCO’s
normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPPT–
2006–0898. EPA’s policy is that all
comments received will be included in
the docket without change and may be
made available on-line at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through regulations.gov or email. The regulations.gov website is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through
regulations.gov, your e-mail address
will be automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is
placed in the docket and made available
on the Internet. If you submit an
electronic comment, EPA recommends
that you include your name and other
contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket, visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the docket index available
in regulations.gov. To access the
electronic docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, select ‘‘Advanced
Search,’’ then ‘‘Docket Search.’’ Insert
the docket ID number where indicated
and select the ‘‘Submit’’ button. Follow
the instructions on the regulations.gov
website to view the docket index or
access available documents. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available electronically at
https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only
available in hard copy, at the OPPT
E:\FR\FM\09JNP1.SGM
09JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 111 (Monday, June 9, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 32503-32508]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-12894]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 301
[REG-143716-04]
RIN 1545-BD67
Declaratory Judgments--Gift Tax Determinations
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains proposed regulations under section 7477
of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) regarding petitions filed with the
United States Tax Court for declaratory judgments as to the valuation
of gifts. Changes to the applicable law were made by section 506(c)(1)
of the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 (TRA). The proposed regulations
primarily affect individuals who are donors of gifts. The proposed
regulations provide rules for determining whether a donor may petition
the Tax Court with respect to the value of a gift, including guidance
regarding the definition of ``exhaustion of administrative remedies.''
This document also provides a notice of a public hearing on these
proposed regulations.
DATES: Written and electronic comments must be received by September 8,
2008. Outlines of topics to be discussed at the public hearing
scheduled for October 16, 2008, must be received by September 11, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-143716-04), room
5203, Internal Revenue Service, P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington, DC 20044. Submissions may be hand delivered Monday through
Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-
143716-04), Courier's Desk, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. Alternatively, taxpayers may submit
electronic comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov (IRS REG-143716-04). The public hearing will be
held in the auditorium of the Internal Revenue Building, 1111
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the proposed regulations,
Juli Ro Kim or George Masnik, (202) 622-3090; concerning submissions of
comments, the hearing, and/or to be placed on the building access list
to attend the hearing, Kelly Banks at (202) 622-7180 (not toll-free
numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Gift tax is computed by determining a tax on the total of the gifts
deemed made by the donor in the year for which the return is filed (the
current calendar year) plus the total of that donor's gifts in prior
years (prior taxable gifts). The tax so computed is then reduced by the
tax that would have been payable on the prior taxable gifts, had the
tax rate for the current taxable year applied to the prior taxable
gifts. The result (after taking into account the applicable credit
amount under section 2505) is the gift tax on the gifts in the current
calendar year. Similarly, the estate tax is computed by determining a
tax on the sum of the value of the decedent's taxable estate and the
value of certain taxable gifts (adjusted taxable gifts) made by the
decedent prior to death. The tax computed is then reduced by the gift
tax that would have been payable on the adjusted taxable gifts, had the
estate tax rate applied to the adjusted taxable gifts. The result
(after allowing for various credits) is the estate tax on the taxable
estate.
The Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 (TRA) (Pub. L. 105-34, 111 Stat.
855), the Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998
(Pub. L. 105-206, 112 Stat. 685), and the Tax and Trade Relief
Extension Act of 1998 (Pub. L. 105-277, 112 Stat. 2681-909),
(collectively, the 1998 Acts), enacted or amended sections 2001(f),
2504(c), 6501(c)(9), and 7477, effective in the case of gifts made
after August 5, 1997, to provide a degree of finality regarding the
valuation of lifetime gifts for gift and estate tax purposes. Congress
was concerned that the prior regime resulted in the resolution of
controversies based on stale evidence, and necessitated the retention
of records for unduly long periods of time. H.R. Rep. No. 105-148 at
359 (1997).
Under sections 6501(a) and (c)(9) as amended by TRA and the 1998
Acts, and the applicable regulations, if a transfer of property is
adequately disclosed on a gift tax return, then the period of
limitations for assessment of gift tax with regard to that transfer
will commence to run on the date the return is filed. Once the time for
assessment of gift tax has expired for a transfer made after August 5,
1997, the value of the gift as ``finally determined'' for gift tax
purposes, as defined in section 2001(f), is the value to be used for
purposes of determining prior taxable gifts in computing the gift tax
liability in subsequent years under section 2504(c),
[[Page 32504]]
and for purposes of determining adjusted taxable gifts in computing the
estate tax liability under section 2001(f). Under Sec. Sec. 20.2001-
1(b) and 25.2504-2(b), this finality rule applies with respect to all
issues that might be raised with respect to the transfer, including
valuation issues and legal issues. The amount of a gift is finally
determined if: (1) The amount is shown on a gift tax return and the IRS
does not contest the amount before the period for assessing gift tax
expires; (2) before the period for assessing gift tax expires, the
amount is adjusted by the IRS and the taxpayer does not contest the
adjusted amount; or, (3) the amount is determined by a court or
pursuant to a settlement agreement between the taxpayer and the IRS.
Section 7477 was enacted as part of TRA in conjunction with these
other provisions to provide a declaratory judgment procedure pursuant
to which taxpayers may contest in the United States Tax Court an IRS
determination regarding the value of a gift. See H.R. Conf. Rep. No.
105-220, at 407-408 (1997). In the absence of section 7477, without an
actual gift tax deficiency, a taxpayer would be unable to petition the
Tax Court to contest the determination or, without an overpayment of
tax, file a claim for refund or bring suit for refund in Federal court.
This could occur, for example, if an increase in gift tax determined
under section 2502 is offset by the taxpayer's applicable credit amount
under section 2505(a), so that no additional tax would be assessed as a
result of the valuation increase. Thus, without section 7477, such a
taxpayer would be left without any way to challenge the IRS
determination, even though, upon the expiration of the statute of
limitations, that determination would become binding for purposes of
calculating the cumulative gift tax on all future gifts of that
taxpayer, as well as the taxpayer's estate tax liability.
Explanation of Provisions
Under section 7477(a), the donor may contest an IRS determination
of the amount of a gift. Specifically, the donor may petition the Tax
Court for a declaratory judgment, provided that certain requirements
are met. Section 7477(a) applies in the case of an actual controversy
involving a determination by the IRS regarding the value of a gift that
is shown on the gift tax return or disclosed on the gift tax return or
in a statement attached to that return.
These proposed regulations provide a procedure for pursuing a
declaratory judgment in the Tax Court pursuant to section 7477 in
situations where, prior to the enactment of that section, the taxpayer
would have had no remedy to challenge the IRS determination.
Specifically, the procedure provided by these proposed regulations
applies only in those situations where an adjustment by the IRS does
not result in a gift tax deficiency or refund. In situations where the
IRS adjustment results in a proposed tax deficiency or a potential
refund, taxpayers should not follow the procedures in these proposed
regulations but should continue to follow the procedures already in
place to dispute a deficiency or claim a refund. These procedures more
efficiently address and resolve disputes involving a deficiency or
refund.
The first requirement for eligibility for relief under section 7477
is that the transfer must be shown or disclosed ``on the return of tax
imposed by chapter 12,'' that is, a Federal gift tax return, or on a
statement attached to the return. Under the proposed regulations, the
return of tax imposed by chapter 12 is defined as the last gift tax
return for the calendar year filed on or before the due date of the
return, including extensions granted (if any), or if a timely return is
not filed, the first gift tax return for the calendar year filed after
the due date.
If the transfer is not shown or disclosed on the gift tax return,
or on a statement attached to the return, a declaratory judgment under
section 7477 is not available. If, however, a transfer is disclosed on
the return or on a statement attached to the return, this eligibility
requirement for the section 7477 procedure is satisfied, even if the
transfer is disclosed in a manner that does not satisfy the
requirements of section 6501(c)(9) and Sec. 301.6501(c)-1(e) or (f)
pertaining to adequate disclosure sufficient to commence the running of
the period of limitations on assessment. There may be no compelling
reason for the IRS to examine a transaction that is disclosed on the
return but not in a manner sufficient to trigger the running of the
statute of limitations, because the time period for adjusting the value
of the gift is not limited by the statute of limitations for
assessments. The Treasury Department and the IRS, however, recognize
that in many cases the IRS may prefer to contemporaneously resolve the
transfer tax treatment of that transaction, even though the standards
for adequate disclosure with regard to that transaction have not been
satisfied by the donor. Thus, the IRS in its discretion may make a
determination regarding the transfer and place the transfer in
controversy by mailing a notice of determination of value used in
unagreed cases (Letter 3569) with regard to that transfer. The ability
to place a transfer that is not adequately disclosed in controversy is
consistent with the Congressional purpose in enacting the TRA
provisions, noted previously, to promote the early resolution of gift
tax controversies based on contemporaneous evidence. The IRS and
Treasury Department emphasize that the issuance of a Letter 3569 with
regard to such a transfer does not constitute a determination by the
IRS that the transfer was adequately disclosed or otherwise cause the
period of limitations on assessment to commence to run with respect to
that transfer.
Alternatively, the IRS may in its discretion decide not to put a
transfer in controversy at that time (whether or not any other transfer
reported on a gift tax return is then put into controversy). If the IRS
decides not to put the transfer into controversy at that time, the IRS
will not issue a Letter 3569 (described in this preamble) (or the
Letter 3569 issued will not address that transfer), the declaratory
judgment procedure will not be available for that transfer, and the
limitations period applicable to that transfer will remain open.
Section 7477 also requires an actual controversy with respect to a
determination by the IRS of the value of the disclosed transfer. Thus,
the donor is not permitted to bypass the examination process and
unilaterally seek a declaratory judgment. Generally, the IRS must
propose adjustments with which the donor disagrees. Accordingly, the
proposed regulations provide that, in order for the section 7477
declaratory judgment procedure to be available to a donor, the IRS must
first make a determination regarding the gift tax treatment of the
transfer that results in an actual controversy in a situation where the
adjustments do not result in a gift tax deficiency or refund. This IRS
determination is deemed to be made by the mailing of a Letter 3569 to
notify the taxpayer of the adjustments proposed by the IRS. The mailing
of this letter to the donor is the prerequisite for filing a petition
with the Tax Court requesting a declaratory judgment under section
7477.
Section 7477 also requires that the donor's pleading seeking a
declaratory judgment under section 7477 must be filed with the Tax
Court before the 91st day after the mailing of the Letter 3569 by the
IRS. The pleading must be in the form of a petition subject to Tax
Court Rule 211(d).
Finally, section 7477(b)(2) provides that the Tax Court may not
issue a declaratory judgment under section 7477 unless it first
determines that the
[[Page 32505]]
donor has exhausted all administrative remedies available to the donor
within the IRS with respect to the controversy. Tax Court Rule 211(d)
requires that the petition in an action under section 7477 must contain
a statement that the petitioner has exhausted all administrative
remedies within the IRS. See also Tax Court Rule 210(c)(4).
Accordingly, the proposed regulations set forth the administrative
remedies available to the donor with respect to a determination by the
IRS of the amount of a gift, and the circumstances in which the IRS
will not contest the donor's allegation that administrative remedies
have been exhausted. The administrative remedies are intended to
parallel those applicable in the case of an asserted gift tax
deficiency.
Specifically, the proposed regulations provide that the IRS will
not contest the donor's allegation that the donor's administrative
remedies have been exhausted if: (1) The donor requests Appeals
consideration in writing within 30 calendar days after the mailing date
of a notice of preliminary determination of value (Preliminary
Determination Letter) from the IRS, or by such later date for
responding to the Preliminary Determination Letter as determined
pursuant to IRS procedures; (2) the donor participates fully in the
Appeals consideration process, including without limitation timely
submitting all additional information related to the amount of the gift
that is requested by the IRS in connection with (or as a follow-up to)
the Appeals consideration process; and (3) the IRS mails to the donor
the Letter 3569, which will notify the donor of the proposed
adjustments and of the donor's right to contest the determination by
filing a petition for declaratory judgment with the Tax Court before
the 91st day after the date of mailing the Letter 3569. The Letter 3569
usually will be issued by the Appeals office. However, because section
7477 requires that the Tax Court, rather than the IRS, determines
whether the donor has exhausted all administrative remedies, the donor
generally will be sent a Letter 3569 in those situations where the
donor does not respond to the Preliminary Determination Letter, or
expressly declines to participate in the Appeals process. If a donor
does not respond to a Preliminary Determination Letter, or if a donor
does not participate in the Appeals process, the IRS will consider the
donor to have failed to exhaust administrative remedies. In such cases,
the IRS may challenge any allegation in the donor's petition for a
section 7477 declaratory judgment that the donor has exhausted all
administrative remedies.
The proposed regulations also provide that the IRS will not contest
the donor's allegation that all administrative remedies have been
exhausted in certain circumstances where the above-described process is
not followed by the IRS. (For example, the IRS might mail a Letter 3569
to the donor in the absence of these other preliminary steps where,
because of the imminent expiration of the applicable statute of
limitations, the IRS believes there is not sufficient time to issue a
Preliminary Determination Letter to allow Appeals consideration.) If
the IRS's decision not to issue a Preliminary Determination Letter is
not due to the donor's actions or failure to act, the IRS will not
contend that the donor failed to exhaust all administrative remedies,
provided that the donor fully participates in the Appeals consideration
process offered by the IRS during the pendancy of the Tax Court
proceeding. In this regard, the IRS and Treasury Department do not view
the reference to section 7477 contained in Sec. 601.106(a)(2)(iv) of
the Statement of Procedural Rules as currently in effect and Rev. Proc.
87-24 (1987-1 CB 720) as prohibiting Appeals' jurisdiction to consider
docketed cases under current section 7477. The version of section 7477
referenced in those items was repealed prior to the enactment of the
current section 7477 as part of the TRA.
The proposed regulations confirm that the donor is not required to
consent to an extension of the time within which gift tax with respect
to the transfer at issue may be assessed in order to exhaust the
donor's administrative remedies, and that the failure to consent to
such an extension will not be taken into account for this purpose. See
section 7430(b)(1) and Minahan v. Commissioner, 88 T.C. 492 (1987),
considering this issue in the context of section 7430(b)(1) prior to
amendment by Public Law 104-168 (110 Stat. 1452).
Under the proposed regulations, a donor may petition for a
declaratory judgment with respect to disputes regarding valuation and/
or other related issues. This is consistent with Sec. Sec. 20.2001-
1(b) and 25.2504-2(b) providing that, once the gift tax statute of
limitations has expired with respect to a transfer, the IRS is
precluded from making any adjustments with respect to that transfer for
purposes of determining prior taxable gifts or adjusted taxable gifts,
regardless of whether the adjustment involves a valuation issue or a
legal issue pertaining to the proper interpretation of the gift tax
law. See also Sec. 301.6501(c)-1(f)(5) providing a similar rule
regarding transfers that are incomplete gifts but are reported as
completed gifts. Accordingly, even if a gift tax adjustment does not
generate any additional gift tax liability, the IRS nevertheless is
required to propose the adjustment (and to take all other necessary
steps) in order to challenge the return as filed within the statutory
limitations period, regardless of the nature of the issue presented.
Sections 2001(f), 2504(c), 6501(c)(9) and 7477, as enacted or amended
by TRA and the 1998 Acts, provide an integrated statutory regime
pursuant to which taxpayers are accorded finality with respect to
adequately disclosed transfers (except for transfers that are reported
as incomplete gifts), while the IRS is afforded the reasonable
opportunity to identify in a timely manner returns that present issues
that merit further examination. The section 7477 declaratory judgment
procedure is a necessary part of this regime because it provides a
mechanism to finally resolve any disputed adjustments in circumstances
where there is no tax assessment and thus the donor would otherwise be
unable to satisfy the jurisdictional requirements for any judicial
resolution. The IRS and Treasury Department believe it is appropriate
for the declaratory judgment mechanism under section 7477, when
available in circumstances where there is no deficiency or refund, to
be available for all adjustments regardless of whether the basis for
those adjustments is factual, legal, or both.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this notice of proposed rulemaking is
not a significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order
12866. Therefore, a regulatory assessment is not required. It also has
been determined that section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act
(5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply to these regulations and, because
these regulations do not impose a collection of information on small
entities, the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) does not
apply. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code, this regulation has
been submitted to the Small Business Administration for comment on the
impact on small business.
Comments and Public Hearing
Before these proposed regulations are adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to any written (a signed original and eight
(8) copies) or electronic comments that are submitted timely to the
IRS. The IRS and the Treasury Department request
[[Page 32506]]
comments on the clarity of the proposed regulations and how they may be
made easier to understand. All comments will be available for public
inspection and copying.
A public hearing has been scheduled for October 16, 2008 at 10 a.m.
in the auditorium of the Internal Revenue Building, 1111 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. In addition, all visitors must present
photo identification to enter the building. Because of access
restrictions, visitors will not be admitted beyond the immediate
entrance area more than 30 minutes before the hearing starts. For
information about having your name placed on the building access list
to attend the hearing, see the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
of this preamble. The rules of 26 CFR 601.601(a)(3) apply to the
hearing. Persons who wish to present oral comments at the hearing must
submit comments by September 8, 2008, and submit an outline of the
topics to be discussed and the time to be devoted to each topic (signed
original and eight (8) copies) by September 8, 2008.
A period of 10 minutes will be allotted to each person for making
comments. An agenda showing the scheduling of the speakers will be
prepared after the deadline for receiving outlines has passed. Copies
of the agenda will be available free of charge at the hearing.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these proposed regulations is Juli Ro Kim,
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special
Industries), IRS. Other personnel from the IRS and the Treasury
Department participated in their development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 301
Employment taxes, Estate taxes, Excise taxes, Gift taxes, Income
taxes, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Proposed Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 301 is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 301--PROCEDURE AND ADMINISTRATION
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 301 continues to read
in part as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Par. 2. Section 301.7477-1 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 301.7477-1 Declaratory judgments relating to the value of
certain gifts for gift tax purposes.
(a) In general. If the requirements contained in paragraph (d) of
this section are satisfied, a donor may petition the United States Tax
Court under section 7477 for a declaratory judgment regarding the
amount of one or more of the donor's gifts during the calendar year for
Federal gift tax purposes, if the adjustment(s) proposed by the
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) will not result in any deficiency in or
refund of the donor's gift tax liability for that calendar year.
(b) Declaratory judgment procedure--(1) In general. If a donor does
not resolve a dispute with the IRS concerning the value of a transfer
for gift tax purposes at the Examination level, the donor will be sent
a notice of preliminary determination of value, or such other document
as may be utilized by the IRS for this purpose from time to time, but
referred to in this section as a Preliminary Determination Letter,
inviting the donor to file a formal protest and to request
consideration by the appropriate IRS Appeals office. See Sec. Sec.
601.105 and 601.106 of this chapter. Subsequently, the donor will be
sent a notice of determination of value (Letter 3569, or such other
document as may be utilized from time to time by the IRS for this
purpose in cases where no deficiency or refund would result, but
referred to in this section as Letter 3569) if--
(i) The donor requests Appeals consideration in writing within 30
calendar days after the mailing date of the Preliminary Determination
Letter, or by such later date as determined pursuant to IRS procedures,
and the matter is not resolved by Appeals;
(ii) The donor does not request Appeals consideration within the
time provided in paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section; or
(iii) The IRS does not issue a Preliminary Determination Letter in
circumstances described in paragraph (d)(3)(ii) of this section.
(2) Notice of determination of value. The Letter 3569 will notify
the donor of the adjustment(s) proposed by the IRS, and will advise the
donor that the donor may contest the determination made by the IRS by
filing a petition with the Tax Court before the 91st day after the date
on which the Letter 3569 was mailed to the donor by the IRS.
(3) Tax Court petition. If the donor does not file a timely
petition with the Tax Court, the IRS determination as set forth in the
Letter 3569 will be considered the final determination of value, as
defined in sections 2504(c) and 2001(f). If the donor files a timely
petition with the Tax Court, the Tax Court will determine whether the
donor has exhausted available administrative remedies. Under section
7477, the Tax Court is not authorized to issue a declaratory judgment
unless the Tax Court finds that the donor has exhausted all
administrative remedies within the IRS. See paragraph (d)(3) of this
section regarding the exhaustion of administrative remedies.
(c) Adjustments subject to declaratory judgment procedure. The
declaratory judgment procedures set forth in this section apply to
adjustments involving all issues relating to the transfer, including
without limitation valuation issues and legal issues involving the
interpretation and application of the gift tax law.
(d) Requirements for declaratory judgment procedure. The
declaratory judgment procedure provided in this section is available to
a donor with respect to a transfer only if the requirements of
paragraphs (d)(1) through (4) of this section with regard to that
transfer are satisfied.
(1) Reporting. The transfer is shown or disclosed on the return of
tax imposed by chapter 12 for the calendar year during which the
transfer was made or on a statement attached to such return. For
purposes of this paragraph, the term return of tax imposed by chapter
12 means the last gift tax return (Form 709, ``United States Gift (and
Generation-skipping Transfer) Tax Return,'' or such other form as may
be utilized for this purpose from time to time by the IRS) for the
calendar year filed on or before the due date of the return, including
extensions granted if any, or, if a timely return is not filed, the
first gift tax return for that calendar year filed after the due date.
For purposes of satisfying this requirement, the transfer need not be
reported in a manner that constitutes adequate disclosure within the
meaning of Sec. 301.6501(c)-1(e) or (f) (and thus for which, under
Sec. Sec. 20.2001-1(b) and 25.2504-2(b) of this chapter, the period
will not expire during which the IRS may adjust the value of the gift).
The issuance of a Letter 3569 with regard to a transfer disclosed on a
return does not constitute a determination by the IRS that the transfer
was adequately disclosed, or otherwise cause the period of limitations
on assessment to commence to run with respect to that transfer. In
addition, in the case of a transfer that is shown on the return, the
IRS may in its discretion choose to defer until a later time making a
determination with regard to such transfer. If the IRS exercises its
[[Page 32507]]
discretion to defer such determination in that case, the transfer will
not be addressed in the Letter 3569 (if any) sent to the donor
currently, and the donor is not yet eligible for a declaratory judgment
with regard to that transfer under section 7477.
(2) IRS determination and actual controversy. The IRS makes a
determination regarding the gift tax treatment of the transfer that
results in an actual controversy. The IRS makes a determination that
results in an actual controversy with respect to a transfer by mailing
a Letter 3569 to the donor, thereby notifying the donor of the
adjustment(s) proposed by the IRS with regard to that transfer and of
the donor's rights under section 7477.
(3) Exhaustion of administrative remedies--(i) In general--Appeals
office consideration. The Tax Court determines that the donor has
exhausted all administrative remedies available within the IRS for
resolving the controversy. For purposes of this section, the IRS will
consider a donor to have exhausted all administrative remedies if,
prior to filing a petition in Tax Court (except as provided in
paragraph (d)(3)(ii) of this section), the donor, or a qualified
representative of the donor described in Sec. 601.502 of this chapter,
timely requests consideration by Appeals and participates fully in the
Appeals consideration process, including, without limitation, timely
submitting all information related to the transfer that is requested by
the IRS in connection with the Appeals consideration. A timely request
for consideration by Appeals is a written request from the donor for
Appeals consideration made within 30 days after the mailing date of the
Preliminary Determination Letter, or by such later date for responding
to the Preliminary Determination Letter as is agreed to between the
donor and the IRS.
(ii) No Preliminary Determination Letter issued. If the IRS does
not issue a Preliminary Determination Letter to the donor prior to the
issuance of Letter 3569, the IRS nevertheless will consider the donor
to have exhausted all administrative remedies within the IRS for
purposes of section 7477 upon the issuance of the Letter 3569, provided
that--
(A) The IRS decision not to issue the Preliminary Determination
Letter was not due to actions or inactions of the donor (such as a
failure to supply requested information or a current mailing address to
the Area Director having jurisdiction over the tax matter); and
(B) The donor, or a qualified representative of the donor described
in Sec. 601.502 of this chapter, after the filing of a petition in Tax
Court for a declaratory judgment pursuant to section 7477, fully
participates (within the meaning of paragraph (d)(3)(i) of this
section) in the Appeals office consideration when offered by the IRS
while the case is in docketed status.
(iii) Failure to agree to extension of time for assessment. The
donor has the right to agree (or to decline to agree) to an extension
of the time under section 6501 within which gift tax with respect to
the transfer at issue may be assessed. For purposes of section 7477,
the donor's refusal to agree to such an extension will not be
considered by the IRS to constitute a failure by the donor to exhaust
all administrative remedies available to the donor within the IRS.
(4) Timely petition in Tax Court. The donor files a pleading with
the Tax Court requesting a declaratory judgment under section 7477.
This pleading must be filed with the Tax Court before the 91st day
after the date of mailing of the Letter 3569 by the IRS to the donor.
The pleading must be in the form of a petition subject to Tax Court
Rule 211(d).
(e) Examples. The following examples illustrate the provisions of
this section. These examples, however, do not address any other
situations that might affect the Tax Court's jurisdiction over the
proceeding. The examples read as follows:
Example 1. Exhaustion of administrative remedies. The donor (D)
timely files a Form 709, ``United States Gift (and Generation-
Skipping Transfer) Tax Return,'' on which D reports D's completed
gift of closely held stock. After conducting an examination, the IRS
concludes that the value of the stock on the date of the gift is
greater than the value reported on the return. Because the amount of
D's available applicable credit amount under section 2505 is
sufficient to cover any resulting tax liability, no gift tax
deficiency will result from the adjustment. D is unable to resolve
the matter with the IRS examiner. The IRS sends a notice of
preliminary determination of value (Preliminary Determination
Letter) to D informing D of the proposed adjustment. D, within 30
calendar days after the mailing date of the letter, submits a
written request for Appeals consideration. During the Appeals
process, D provides to the Appeals office all additional information
(if any) requested by Appeals relevant to the determination of the
value of the stock in a timely fashion. The Appeals office and D are
unable to reach an agreement regarding the value of the stock as of
the date of the gift. The Appeals office sends D a notice of
determination of value (Letter 3569). For purposes of section 7477,
the IRS will consider D to have exhausted all available
administrative remedies within the IRS, and thus will not contest
the allegation in D's petition that D has exhausted all such
administrative remedies.
Example 2. Exhaustion of administrative remedies. Assume the
same facts as in Example 1, except that D does not timely request
consideration by Appeals after receiving the Preliminary
Determination Letter. A Letter 3569 is mailed to D more than 30 days
after the mailing of the Preliminary Determination Letter and prior
to the expiration of the period of limitations for assessment of
gift tax. D timely files a petition in Tax Court pursuant to section
7477. After the case is docketed, D requests Appeals consideration.
In this situation, because D did not respond timely to the
Preliminary Determination Letter with a written request for Appeals
consideration, the IRS will not consider D to have exhausted all
administrative remedies available within the IRS for purposes of
section 7477 prior to filing the petition in Tax Court, and thus may
contest any allegation in D's petition that D has exhausted all such
administrative remedies.
Example 3. Exhaustion of administrative remedies. D timely files
a Form 709 on which D reports D's completed gifts of interests in a
family limited partnership. After conducting an examination, the IRS
proposes to adjust the value of the gift as reported on the return.
No gift tax deficiency will result from the adjustments, however,
because D has a sufficient amount of available applicable credit
amount under section 2505. D declines to consent to extend the time
for the assessment of gift tax with respect to the gifts at issue.
Because of the pending expiration of the period of limitation on
assessment with respect to the gifts, the IRS determines that there
is not adequate time for Appeals consideration. Accordingly, the IRS
mails to D a Letter 3569, even though a Preliminary Determination
Letter had not first been issued to D. D timely files a petition in
Tax Court pursuant to section 7477. After the case is docketed in
Tax Court, D is offered the opportunity for Appeals to consider any
dispute regarding the determination and participates fully in the
Appeals consideration process. However, the Appeals office and D are
unable to resolve the issue. The IRS will consider D to have
exhausted all administrative remedies available within the IRS, and
thus will not assert that D has not exhausted all such
administrative remedies.
Example 4. Legal issue. In 2006, D transfers nonvested stock
options to a trust for the benefit of D's child. D timely files a
Form 709 reporting the transfer as a completed gift for Federal gift
tax purposes and complies with the adequate disclosure requirements
for purposes of triggering the commencement of the applicable
statute of limitations. Pursuant to Sec. 301.6501(c)-1(f)(5),
adequate disclosure of a transfer that is reported as a completed
gift on the Form 709 will commence the running of the period of
limitations for assessment of gift tax on D, even if the transfer is
ultimately determined to be an incomplete gift for purposes of Sec.
25.2511-2 of this chapter. After conducting an examination, the IRS
concurs with the reported valuation of the stock options, but
concludes that the reported transfer is not a completed gift for
Federal gift tax purposes. D is unable to resolve the matter with
the IRS
[[Page 32508]]
examiner. Assuming that the IRS mails to D a Letter 3569 with regard
to this transfer, and that D complies with the administrative
procedures set forth in this section, including the exhaustion of
all administrative remedies available within the IRS, then D may
file a petition for declaratory judgment with the Tax Court pursuant
to section 7477.
Example 5. Transfers in controversy. On April 16, 2007, D timely
files a Form 709 on which D reports gifts made in 2006 of fractional
interests in certain real property and of interests in a family
limited partnership (FLP). However, although the gifts are disclosed
on the return, the return does not contain information sufficient to
constitute adequate disclosure under Sec. 301.6501(c)-1(e) or (f)
for purposes of the application of the statute of limitations on
assessment of gift tax with respect to the reported gifts. The IRS
conducts an examination and concludes that the value of both the
interests in the real property and the FLP interests on the date(s)
of the transfers are greater than the values reported on the return.
No gift tax deficiency will result from the adjustments because D
has a sufficient amount of remaining applicable credit amount under
section 2505. However, D does not agree with the adjustments. The
IRS sends a Preliminary Determination Letter to D informing D of the
proposed adjustments in the value of the reported gifts. D, within
30 calendar days after the mailing date of the letter, submits a
written request for Appeals consideration. The Appeals office and D
are unable to reach an agreement regarding the value of any of the
gifts. In the exercise of its discretion, the IRS decides to resolve
currently only the value of the real property interests, and to
defer the resolution of the value of the FLP interests. On May 28,
2009, the Appeals office sends D a Letter 3569 addressing only the
value of the gifts of interests in the real property. Because none
of the gifts reported on the return filed on April 16, 2007, were
adequately disclosed for purposes of Sec. 301.6501(c)-1(e) or (f),
the period of limitations during which the IRS may adjust the value
of those gifts has not begun to run. Accordingly, the Letter 3569 is
timely mailed. If D timely files a petition in Tax Court pursuant to
section 7477 with regard to the value of the interests in the real
property, then, assuming the other requirements of section 7477 are
satisfied with regard to those interests, the Tax Court's
declaratory judgment, once it becomes final, will determine the
value of the gifts of the interests in the real property. Because
the IRS has not yet put the gift tax value of the interests in the
FLP into controversy, the procedure under section 7477 is not
available with regard to those gifts.
Par. 3. Section 301.7477-2 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 301.7477-2 Effective date.
Section 301.7477-1 applies to civil proceedings described in
section 7477 filed in the United States Tax Court on or after the date
these regulations are published as final regulations in the Federal
Register.
Linda E. Stiff,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
[FR Doc. E8-12894 Filed 6-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P