Notice of Suspension and Initiation of Debarment Proceedings; Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, 32577-32579 [E8-12832]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 111 / Monday, June 9, 2008 / Notices mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES subcommittee that maintains ASTM D1076–06), for example, noted that the Category 4 standard specified in the petition was added for NRL from botanical sources other than Hevea and that ASTM D1076–06 does not apply to ‘‘compounded latex concentrates,’’ such as adhesives (Ref. 20). The Pressure Sensitive Tape Council noted many of the same issues discussed in this unit, including concerns similar to ASTM’s regarding the appropriateness of the standard, the lack of facts supporting the petitioner’s autism hypothesis, and the unexplained focus on Hevea NRL adhesives as opposed to the many other uses of Hevea NRL (gloves, sports equipment, carpet backing, balloons, rubber bands, handles on tools, and clothing elastics) (Ref. 21). The Rubber Manufacturers Association (RMA) noted the lack of evidence of a link between Hevea NRL exposure and autism, commenting that in the long history of NRL harvest and use, and in the course of multiple government inquiries into latex allergy, no one had observed a link between NRL and autism. The RMA also commented that the petition did not cite any evidence that allergens in NRL adhesives are being transported to the human body and described differences in exposure potential between dipped latex products (such as medical gloves, balloons, and condoms) and dry rubber products (such as tires, hoses, belts, and balls). The RMA also commented that the primary route of consumer exposure to adhesives would be through medical bandages, which, as a medical device, would fall under the jurisdiction of FDA. Finally, the RMA criticized the use of some of the references in petitioner’s Medical Hypotheses paper, commenting that several references did not in fact support the petitioner’s hypothesis (Ref. 22). V. References 1. Dochniak, Michael J. Citizen Petition under TSCA to prohibit the use of Hevea-Brasiliensis natural rubber latex adhesives in the United States, wherein said adhesives have a protein content greater than 200 micrograms per dry weight of latex. February 26, 2008. 2. EPA, OPPT, Economics, Exposure and Technology Division (EETD). Profile: Natural Rubber Latex Adhesives. May 7, 2008. 3. ASTM. ASTM D1076–06. Standard Specification for Rubber-Concentrated, Ammonia Preserved, Creamed, and Centrifuged Natural Latex. June 2006. 4. ASTM. Active Standard: D6499–07. Standard Test Method for the Immunological Measurement of VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:05 Jun 06, 2008 Jkt 214001 Antigenic Protein in Natural Rubber and Its Products. Available on-line at: https:// enterprise.astm.org/REDLINE_PAGES/ D6499.htm (last visited May 13, 2008). 5. Dochniak, Michael J. Autism spectrum disorders-Exogenous protein insult, Medical Hypotheses (2007), doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2007.01.060. 6. CPSC. Letter from Todd Stevenson, Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, to Debra Adkins, responding to her petition HP 00–2 requesting CPSC to issue a rule adding NRL to the list of strong sensitizers. June 4, 2004. 7. FDA. FDA Clears Glove Made from New Type of Latex. FDA News. April 23, 2008. 8. National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), NIOSH Publication No. 97–135: Preventing Allergic Reactions to Natural Rubber Latex in the Workplace (June 1997). 9. Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Food Advisory Committee Meeting, Additives and Ingredients Subcommittee. Latex Glove Background Report. August 2003. 10. Northwestern University, Office for Research Safety, Laboratory Safety, Office of the Vice President for Research. Allergic Reactions to Latex Gloves. Available on-line at: https:// www.research.northwestern.edu/ors/ labsafe/latex.htm (last visited May 13, 2008). 11. CPSC. Memorandum from Jacqueline Elder, Assistant Executive Director for Hazard Identification and Reduction, to Todd Stevenson, Secretary, re: Additional Information on Petition on the Natural Rubber Latex (HP 00–2). April 1, 2004. 12. CPSC. Briefing Package, Petition Requesting that Natural Rubber latex be declared a Strong Sensitizer (HP00–2). October 2003. 13. European Commission, Scientific Committee on Medicinal Products and Medical Devices. Opinion on natural rubber latex allergy. June 2000. 14. U.S. Patent #5,741,885. 15. Siler, D.J.; Cornish, K.; and Hamilton, R.G. Absence of crossreactivity of IgE antibodies from subjects allergic to Hevea brasiliensis latex with a new source of natural rubber latex from guayule (Parthenium argentatum). Journal of Allergy Clinical Immunology. 98: 895–902. 1996. 16. U.S. Patent #6,054,525. 17. EPA. Hevea brasiliensis Natural Rubber Latex Adhesives; TSCA Section 21 Petition; Notice of Receipt. Federal Register (73 FR 22368, April 25, 2008) (FRL–8361–3). Available on-line at: https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr. 18. Comment from Andover Healthcare, Inc. May 12, 2008. PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 32577 19. Letter from the Yulex Corp. May 7, 2008. 20. Letter from ASTM International. May 7, 2008. 21. Letter from the Pressure Sensitive Tape Council. May 9, 2008. 22. Letter from the Rubber Manufacturers Association. May 12, 2008. List of Subjects Environmental protection, Antigenic proteins, Asperger syndrome, Autism, Health, Hevea brasiliensis natural rubber latex adhesives, Infants and children. Dated: June 3, 2008. James B. Gulliford, Assistant Administrator, Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances. [FR Doc. E8–12850 Filed 6–6–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–S FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION [DA 08–1181] Notice of Suspension and Initiation of Debarment Proceedings; Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Enforcement Bureau gives notice of Mr. George Marchelos’ suspension from the schools and libraries universal service support mechanism (or ‘‘E-Rate Program’’). Additionally, the Enforcement Bureau gives notice that debarment proceedings are commencing against him. Mr. Marchelos, or any person who has an existing contract with or intends to contract with him to provide or receive services in matters arising out of activities associated with or related to the schools and libraries support, may respond by filing an opposition request, supported by documentation to Diana Lee. DATES: Opposition requests must be received by July 9, 2008. However, an opposition request by the party to be suspended must be received 30 days from the receipt of the suspension letter or July 9, 2008, whichever comes first. The Enforcement Bureau will decide any opposition request for reversal or modification of suspension or debarment within 90 days of its receipt of such requests. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Diana Lee, Federal Communications E:\FR\FM\09JNN1.SGM 09JNN1 32578 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 111 / Monday, June 9, 2008 / Notices Commission, Enforcement Bureau, Investigations and Hearings Division, Room 4–C330, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554. Diana Lee may be contacted by phone at (202) 418– 0843 or e-mail at diana.lee@fcc.gov. If Ms. Lee is unavailable, you may contact Ms. Vickie Robinson, Assistant Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, by telephone at (202) 418–1420 and by email at vickie.robinson@fcc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Enforcement Bureau has suspension and debarment authority pursuant to 47 CFR 54.8 and 47 CFR 0.111. Suspension will help to ensure that the party to be suspended cannot continue to benefit from the schools and libraries mechanism pending resolution of the debarment process. Attached is the suspension letter, DA 08–1181, which was mailed to Mr. Marchelos and released on May 19, 2008. The complete text of the notice of debarment is available for public inspection and copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portal II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY–A257, Washington, DC 20554. In addition, the complete text is available on the FCC’s Web site at https://www.fcc.gov. The text may also be purchased from the Commission’s duplicating inspection and copying during regular business hours at the contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., Portal II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY–B420, Washington, DC 20554, telephone (202) 488–5300 or (800) 378– 3160, facsimile (202) 488–5563, or via email https://www.bcpiweb.com. Federal Communications Commission. Hillary Denigro, Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau. mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES The attached is the Suspension and Initiation of Debarment Letter to George Marchelos. May 19, 2008 DA 08–1181 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED AND FACSIMILE (415–436–7706) Mr. George Marchelos, c/o Geoffrey A. Hanson, Esq., Federal Public Defender, 19th Floor Federal Building—Box 36106, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102. Re: Notice of Suspension and Initiation of Debarment Proceedings, File No. EB–08– IH–1140 Dear Mr. Marchelos: The Federal Communications Commission (‘‘FCC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) has received notice of your conviction of wire fraud and aiding and abetting, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1343 and 2, as well as collusion and aiding and abetting, in violation of 15 U.S.C. 1 and 2, in connection with your participation in the VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:05 Jun 06, 2008 Jkt 214001 schools and libraries universal service support mechanism (‘‘E-Rate program’’).1 Consequently, pursuant to 47 CFR 54.8, this letter constitutes official notice of your suspension from the E-Rate program. In addition, the Enforcement Bureau (‘‘Bureau’’) hereby notifies you that we are commencing debarment proceedings against you.2 I. Notice of Suspension The Commission has established procedures to prevent persons who have ‘‘defrauded the government or engaged in similar acts through activities associated with or related to the schools and libraries support mechanism’’ from receiving the benefits associated with that program.3 You pled guilty to wire fraud and collusion in connection with your participation in two schemes to defraud the E-Rate program.4 Specifically, you admitted that, as a former consultant for two school districts in California and sales representative of Video Network Communications, Inc. (‘‘VNCI’’), you participated in schemes to defraud the Erate program and bid rigging on E-rate projects for certain school districts in favor of other co-conspirators or defendants.5 1 Any further reference in this letter to ‘‘your conviction’’ refers to your guilty plea and subsequent conviction. United States v. George Marchelos, Criminal Docket No. 3:05–CR–00208– CRB–009, Judgment (N.D.Cal. filed and entered Apr. 10, 2008) (‘‘George Marchelos Judgment’’). See United States v. Video Network Communications, Inc. et al., Criminal Docket No. 3:05–CR–00208– CRB, Superseding Indictment at paras. 72–88 (N.D.Cal. filed Dec. 8, 2005 and entered Dec. 12, 2005), https://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f213600/ 213626.htm (accessed May 1, 2008) (‘‘VNCI Superseding Indictment’’). 2 47 CFR 54.8; 47 CFR 0.111 (delegating to the Enforcement Bureau authority to resolve universal service suspension and debarment proceedings). The Commission adopted debarment rules for the schools and libraries universal service support mechanism in 2003. See Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202 (2003) (‘‘Second Report and Order’’) (adopting section 54.521 to suspend and debar parties from the E-rate program). In 2007, the Commission extended the debarment rules to apply to all of the Federal universal service support mechanisms. Comprehensive Review of the Universal Service Fund Management, Administration, and Oversight; Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service; Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism; Lifeline and Link Up; Changes to the Board of Directors for the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., Report and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 16372, 16410–12 (2007) (Program Management Order) (renumbering section 54.521 of the universal service debarment rules as section 54.8 and amending subsections (a)(1), (5), (c), (d), (e)(2)(i), (3), (e)(4), and (g)). 3 See Second Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 9225, para. 66; Program Management Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 16387, para. 32. The Commission’s debarment rules define a ‘‘person’’ as ‘‘[a]ny individual, group of individuals, corporation, partnership, association, unit of government or legal entity, however, organized.’’ 47 CFR 54.8(a)(6). 4 See George Marchelos Judgment at 1. 5 See VNCI Superseding Indictment at paras. 6, 72–88. The following four individuals, who were also charged in the VNCI Superseding Indictment, have pled guilty or been found guilty and subsequently sentenced: Judy Green, Earl Nelson, William Holman, and Allan Green. We are sending PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Pursuant to section 54.8(a)(4) of the Commission’s rules,6 your conviction requires the Bureau to suspend you from participating in any activities associated with or related to the schools and libraries fund mechanism, including the receipt of funds or discounted services through the schools and libraries fund mechanism, or consulting with, assisting, or advising applicants or service providers regarding the schools and libraries support mechanism.7 Your suspension becomes effective upon the earlier of your receipt of this letter or publication of notice in the Federal Register.8 Suspension is immediate pending the Bureau’s final debarment determination. In accordance with the Commission’s debarment rules, you may contest this suspension or the scope of this suspension by filing arguments in opposition to the suspension, with any relevant documentation. Your request must be received within 30 days after you receive this letter or after notice is published in the Federal Register, whichever comes first.9 Such requests, however, will not ordinarily be granted.10 The Bureau may reverse or limit the scope of suspension only upon a finding of extraordinary circumstances.11 Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Bureau will decide any request for reversal or modification of suspension within 90 days of its receipt of such request.12 II. Initiation of Debarment Proceedings Your guilty plea and conviction of criminal conduct in connection with the E-Rate program, in addition to serving as a basis for immediate suspension from the program, also serves as a basis for the initiation of debarment proceedings against you. Your conviction falls within the categories of causes for debarment defined in section 54.8(c) of the Commission’s rules.13 Therefore, pursuant to section 54.8(a)(4) of separate notices of suspension and initiation of debarment proceedings to these individuals. VNCI is now defunct and charges against the company have been dropped. 6 47 CFR 54.8(a)(4). See Second Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 9225–9227, paras. 67–74. 7 47 CFR 54.8(a)(1), (d). 8 Second Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 9226, para. 69; 47 CFR 54.8(e)(1). 9 47 CFR 54.8(e)(4). 10 Id. 11 47 CFR 54.8(e)(5). 12 See Second Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 9226, para. 70; 47 CFR 54.8(e)(5), 54.8(f). 13 ‘‘Causes for suspension and debarment are the conviction of or civil judgment for attempt or commission of criminal fraud, theft, embezzlement, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, receiving stolen property, making false claims, obstruction of justice and other fraud or criminal offense arising out of activities associated with or related to the schools and libraries support mechanism, the high-cost support mechanism, the rural healthcare support mechanism, and the low-income support mechanism.’’ 47 CFR 54.8(c). Such activities ‘‘include the receipt of funds or discounted services through [the Federal universal service] support mechanisms, or consulting with, assisting, or advising applicants or service providers regarding [the Federal universal service] support mechanisms.’’ 47 CFR 54.8(a)(1). E:\FR\FM\09JNN1.SGM 09JNN1 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 111 / Monday, June 9, 2008 / Notices mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES the Commission’s rules, your conviction requires the Bureau to commence debarment proceedings against you. As with your suspension, you may contest debarment or the scope of the proposed debarment by filing arguments and any relevant documentation within 30 calendar days of the earlier of the receipt of this letter or of publication in the Federal Register.14 Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Bureau will debar you.15 Within 90 days of receipt of any opposition to your suspension and proposed debarment, the Bureau, in the absence of extraordinary circumstances, will provide you with notice of its decision to debar.16 If the Bureau decides to debar you, its decision will become effective upon the earlier of your receipt of a debarment notice or publication of the decision in the Federal Register.17 If and when your debarment becomes effective, you will be prohibited from participating in activities associated with or related to the schools and libraries support mechanism for three years from the date of debarment.18 The Bureau may, if necessary to protect the public interest, extend the debarment period.19 Please direct any response, if by messenger or hand delivery, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 236 Massachusetts Avenue, NE., Suite 110, Washington, DC 20002, to the attention of Diana Lee, Attorney Advisor, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau, Room 4–C330, with a copy to Vickie Robinson, Assistant Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau, Room 4–C330, Federal Communications Commission. If sent by commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail), the response should be sent to the Federal Communications Commission, 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, Maryland 20743. If sent by first-class, Express, or Priority mail, the response should be sent to Diana Lee, Attorney Advisor, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., Room 4–C330, Washington, DC 20554, with a copy to Vickie Robinson, Assistant Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., Room 4–C330, Washington, DC 20554. You shall also transmit a copy of the response via email to diana.lee@fcc.gov and to vickie.robinson@fcc.gov. If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Lee via mail, by telephone at (202) 418– 14 See Second Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 9226, para. 70; 47 CFR 54.8(e)(3). 15 Second Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 9227, para. 74. 16 See id., 18 FCC Rcd at 9226, para. 70; 47 CFR 54.8(e)(5). 17 Id. The Commission may reverse a debarment, or may limit the scope or period of debarment upon a finding of extraordinary circumstances, following the filing of a petition by you or an interested party or upon motion by the Commission. 47 CFR 54.8(f). 18 Second Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 9225, para. 67; 47 CFR 54.8(d), 54.8(g). 19 Id. VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:05 Jun 06, 2008 Jkt 214001 1420 or by e-mail at diana.lee@fcc.gov. If Ms. Lee is unavailable, you may contact Ms. Vickie Robinson, Assistant Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, by telephone at (202) 418–1420 and by e-mail at vickie.robinson@fcc.gov. Sincerely yours, Hillary S. DeNigro, Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau. cc: Kristy Carroll, Esq., Universal Service Administrative Company (via e-mail); Michael Wood, Antitrust Division, United States Department of Justice (via mail) [FR Doc. E8–12832 Filed 6–6–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712–01–P FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION [DA 08–1179] Notice of Suspension and Initiation of Debarment Proceedings; Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Enforcement Bureau gives notice of Mr. Allan Green’s suspension from the schools and libraries universal service support mechanism (or ‘‘E-Rate Program’’). Additionally, the Enforcement Bureau gives notice that debarment proceedings are commencing against him. Mr. Green, or any person who has an existing contract with or intends to contract with him to provide or receive services in matters arising out of activities associated with or related to the schools and libraries support, may respond by filing an opposition request, supported by documentation to Diana Lee. DATES: Opposition requests must be received by July 9, 2008. However, an opposition request by the party to be suspended must be received 30 days from the receipt of the suspension letter or July 9, 2008, whichever comes first. The Enforcement Bureau will decide any opposition request for reversal or modification of suspension or debarment within 90 days of its receipt of such requests. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Diana Lee, Federal Communications Commission, Enforcement Bureau, Investigations and Hearings Division, Room 4–C330, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554. Diana Lee may be contacted by phone at (202) 418– 0843 or e-mail at diana.lee@fcc.gov. If Ms. Lee is unavailable, you may contact Ms. Vickie Robinson, Assistant Chief, PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 32579 Investigations and Hearings Division, by telephone at (202) 418–1420 and by email at vickie.robinson@fcc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Enforcement Bureau has suspension and debarment authority pursuant to 47 CFR 54.8 and 47 CFR 0.111. Suspension will help to ensure that the party to be suspended cannot continue to benefit from the schools and libraries mechanism pending resolution of the debarment process. Attached is the suspension letter, DA 08–1179, which was mailed to Mr. Green and released on May 19, 2008. The complete text of the notice of debarment is available for public inspection and copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portal II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY–A257, Washington, DC 20554. In addition, the complete text is available on the FCC’s Web site at https://www.fcc.gov. The text may also be purchased from the Commission’s duplicating inspection and copying during regular business hours at the contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., Portal II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY–B420, Washington, DC 20554, telephone (202) 488–5300 or (800) 378–3160, facsimile (202) 488– 5563, or via e-mail https:// www.bcpiweb.com. Federal Communications Commission. Hillary Denigro, Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau. The attached is the Suspension and Initiation of Debarment Letter to Allan Green. May 19, 2008 DA 08–1179 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED AND E-MAIL Mr. Allan Green, c/o Mark Rosenbush, Esq., Attorney at Law, 214 Duboce Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94103. Re: Notice of Suspension and Initiation of Debarment Proceedings, File No. EB–08– IH–1141 Dear Mr. Green: The Federal Communications Commission (‘‘FCC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) has received notice of your conviction of conspiracy to commit mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 371, in connection with your participation in the schools and libraries universal service support mechanism (‘‘E-Rate program’’).1 1 Any further reference in this letter to ‘‘your conviction’’ refers to your guilty plea and subsequent conviction of conspiracy to commit mail fraud. See United States v. Allan Green, Criminal Docket No. 3:05–CR–00208–CRB–009, Judgment (N.D.Cal. filed and entered Apr. 10, 2008) (‘‘Allan Green Judgment’’), Substitute Information (N.D.Cal. filed Apr. 9, 2007 and entered Apr. 10, 2007) (‘‘Allan Green Substitute Information’’). See United States v. Video Network Communications, E:\FR\FM\09JNN1.SGM Continued 09JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 111 (Monday, June 9, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32577-32579]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-12832]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[DA 08-1181]


Notice of Suspension and Initiation of Debarment Proceedings; 
Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Enforcement Bureau gives notice of Mr. George Marchelos' 
suspension from the schools and libraries universal service support 
mechanism (or ``E-Rate Program''). Additionally, the Enforcement Bureau 
gives notice that debarment proceedings are commencing against him. Mr. 
Marchelos, or any person who has an existing contract with or intends 
to contract with him to provide or receive services in matters arising 
out of activities associated with or related to the schools and 
libraries support, may respond by filing an opposition request, 
supported by documentation to Diana Lee.

DATES: Opposition requests must be received by July 9, 2008. However, 
an opposition request by the party to be suspended must be received 30 
days from the receipt of the suspension letter or July 9, 2008, 
whichever comes first. The Enforcement Bureau will decide any 
opposition request for reversal or modification of suspension or 
debarment within 90 days of its receipt of such requests.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Diana Lee, Federal Communications

[[Page 32578]]

Commission, Enforcement Bureau, Investigations and Hearings Division, 
Room 4-C330, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554. Diana Lee may 
be contacted by phone at (202) 418-0843 or e-mail at diana.lee@fcc.gov. 
If Ms. Lee is unavailable, you may contact Ms. Vickie Robinson, 
Assistant Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, by telephone at 
(202) 418-1420 and by e-mail at vickie.robinson@fcc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Enforcement Bureau has suspension and 
debarment authority pursuant to 47 CFR 54.8 and 47 CFR 0.111. 
Suspension will help to ensure that the party to be suspended cannot 
continue to benefit from the schools and libraries mechanism pending 
resolution of the debarment process. Attached is the suspension letter, 
DA 08-1181, which was mailed to Mr. Marchelos and released on May 19, 
2008. The complete text of the notice of debarment is available for 
public inspection and copying during regular business hours at the FCC 
Reference Information Center, Portal II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-
A257, Washington, DC 20554. In addition, the complete text is available 
on the FCC's Web site at https://www.fcc.gov. The text may also be 
purchased from the Commission's duplicating inspection and copying 
during regular business hours at the contractor, Best Copy and 
Printing, Inc., Portal II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B420, 
Washington, DC 20554, telephone (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, 
facsimile (202) 488-5563, or via e-mail https://www.bcpiweb.com.

Federal Communications Commission.
Hillary Denigro,
Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau.
    The attached is the Suspension and Initiation of Debarment Letter 
to George Marchelos.

May 19, 2008
DA 08-1181

VIA CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED AND FACSIMILE (415-436-7706)

Mr. George Marchelos, c/o Geoffrey A. Hanson, Esq., Federal Public 
Defender, 19th Floor Federal Building--Box 36106, 450 Golden Gate 
Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102.

Re: Notice of Suspension and Initiation of Debarment Proceedings, 
File No. EB-08-IH-1140
    Dear Mr. Marchelos: The Federal Communications Commission 
(``FCC'' or ``Commission'') has received notice of your conviction 
of wire fraud and aiding and abetting, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 
1343 and 2, as well as collusion and aiding and abetting, in 
violation of 15 U.S.C. 1 and 2, in connection with your 
participation in the schools and libraries universal service support 
mechanism (``E-Rate program'').\1\ Consequently, pursuant to 47 CFR 
54.8, this letter constitutes official notice of your suspension 
from the E-Rate program. In addition, the Enforcement Bureau 
(``Bureau'') hereby notifies you that we are commencing debarment 
proceedings against you.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Any further reference in this letter to ``your conviction'' 
refers to your guilty plea and subsequent conviction. United States 
v. George Marchelos, Criminal Docket No. 3:05-CR-00208-CRB-009, 
Judgment (N.D.Cal. filed and entered Apr. 10, 2008) (``George 
Marchelos Judgment''). See United States v. Video Network 
Communications, Inc. et al., Criminal Docket No. 3:05-CR-00208-CRB, 
Superseding Indictment at paras. 72-88 (N.D.Cal. filed Dec. 8, 2005 
and entered Dec. 12, 2005), https://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f213600/
213626.htm (accessed May 1, 2008) (``VNCI Superseding Indictment'').
    \2\ 47 CFR 54.8; 47 CFR 0.111 (delegating to the Enforcement 
Bureau authority to resolve universal service suspension and 
debarment proceedings). The Commission adopted debarment rules for 
the schools and libraries universal service support mechanism in 
2003. See Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, 
Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 
18 FCC Rcd 9202 (2003) (``Second Report and Order'') (adopting 
section 54.521 to suspend and debar parties from the E-rate 
program). In 2007, the Commission extended the debarment rules to 
apply to all of the Federal universal service support mechanisms. 
Comprehensive Review of the Universal Service Fund Management, 
Administration, and Oversight; Federal-State Joint Board on 
Universal Service; Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support 
Mechanism; Lifeline and Link Up; Changes to the Board of Directors 
for the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., Report and 
Order, 22 FCC Rcd 16372, 16410-12 (2007) (Program Management Order) 
(renumbering section 54.521 of the universal service debarment rules 
as section 54.8 and amending subsections (a)(1), (5), (c), (d), 
(e)(2)(i), (3), (e)(4), and (g)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Notice of Suspension

    The Commission has established procedures to prevent persons who 
have ``defrauded the government or engaged in similar acts through 
activities associated with or related to the schools and libraries 
support mechanism'' from receiving the benefits associated with that 
program.\3\ You pled guilty to wire fraud and collusion in 
connection with your participation in two schemes to defraud the E-
Rate program.\4\ Specifically, you admitted that, as a former 
consultant for two school districts in California and sales 
representative of Video Network Communications, Inc. (``VNCI''), you 
participated in schemes to defraud the E-rate program and bid 
rigging on E-rate projects for certain school districts in favor of 
other co-conspirators or defendants.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Second Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 9225, para. 66; 
Program Management Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 16387, para. 32. The 
Commission's debarment rules define a ``person'' as ``[a]ny 
individual, group of individuals, corporation, partnership, 
association, unit of government or legal entity, however, 
organized.'' 47 CFR 54.8(a)(6).
    \4\ See George Marchelos Judgment at 1.
    \5\ See VNCI Superseding Indictment at paras. 6, 72-88. The 
following four individuals, who were also charged in the VNCI 
Superseding Indictment, have pled guilty or been found guilty and 
subsequently sentenced: Judy Green, Earl Nelson, William Holman, and 
Allan Green. We are sending separate notices of suspension and 
initiation of debarment proceedings to these individuals. VNCI is 
now defunct and charges against the company have been dropped.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to section 54.8(a)(4) of the Commission's rules,\6\ 
your conviction requires the Bureau to suspend you from 
participating in any activities associated with or related to the 
schools and libraries fund mechanism, including the receipt of funds 
or discounted services through the schools and libraries fund 
mechanism, or consulting with, assisting, or advising applicants or 
service providers regarding the schools and libraries support 
mechanism.\7\ Your suspension becomes effective upon the earlier of 
your receipt of this letter or publication of notice in the Federal 
Register.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 47 CFR 54.8(a)(4). See Second Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 
at 9225-9227, paras. 67-74.
    \7\ 47 CFR 54.8(a)(1), (d).
    \8\ Second Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 9226, para. 69; 47 
CFR 54.8(e)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Suspension is immediate pending the Bureau's final debarment 
determination. In accordance with the Commission's debarment rules, 
you may contest this suspension or the scope of this suspension by 
filing arguments in opposition to the suspension, with any relevant 
documentation. Your request must be received within 30 days after 
you receive this letter or after notice is published in the Federal 
Register, whichever comes first.\9\ Such requests, however, will not 
ordinarily be granted.\10\ The Bureau may reverse or limit the scope 
of suspension only upon a finding of extraordinary 
circumstances.\11\ Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Bureau 
will decide any request for reversal or modification of suspension 
within 90 days of its receipt of such request.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 47 CFR 54.8(e)(4).
    \10\ Id.
    \11\ 47 CFR 54.8(e)(5).
    \12\ See Second Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 9226, para. 70; 
47 CFR 54.8(e)(5), 54.8(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Initiation of Debarment Proceedings

    Your guilty plea and conviction of criminal conduct in 
connection with the E-Rate program, in addition to serving as a 
basis for immediate suspension from the program, also serves as a 
basis for the initiation of debarment proceedings against you. Your 
conviction falls within the categories of causes for debarment 
defined in section 54.8(c) of the Commission's rules.\13\ Therefore, 
pursuant to section 54.8(a)(4) of

[[Page 32579]]

the Commission's rules, your conviction requires the Bureau to 
commence debarment proceedings against you.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ ``Causes for suspension and debarment are the conviction of 
or civil judgment for attempt or commission of criminal fraud, 
theft, embezzlement, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction 
of records, making false statements, receiving stolen property, 
making false claims, obstruction of justice and other fraud or 
criminal offense arising out of activities associated with or 
related to the schools and libraries support mechanism, the high-
cost support mechanism, the rural healthcare support mechanism, and 
the low-income support mechanism.'' 47 CFR 54.8(c). Such activities 
``include the receipt of funds or discounted services through [the 
Federal universal service] support mechanisms, or consulting with, 
assisting, or advising applicants or service providers regarding 
[the Federal universal service] support mechanisms.'' 47 CFR 
54.8(a)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As with your suspension, you may contest debarment or the scope 
of the proposed debarment by filing arguments and any relevant 
documentation within 30 calendar days of the earlier of the receipt 
of this letter or of publication in the Federal Register.\14\ Absent 
extraordinary circumstances, the Bureau will debar you.\15\ Within 
90 days of receipt of any opposition to your suspension and proposed 
debarment, the Bureau, in the absence of extraordinary 
circumstances, will provide you with notice of its decision to 
debar.\16\ If the Bureau decides to debar you, its decision will 
become effective upon the earlier of your receipt of a debarment 
notice or publication of the decision in the Federal Register.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See Second Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 9226, para. 70; 
47 CFR 54.8(e)(3).
    \15\ Second Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 9227, para. 74.
    \16\ See id., 18 FCC Rcd at 9226, para. 70; 47 CFR 54.8(e)(5).
    \17\ Id. The Commission may reverse a debarment, or may limit 
the scope or period of debarment upon a finding of extraordinary 
circumstances, following the filing of a petition by you or an 
interested party or upon motion by the Commission. 47 CFR 54.8(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If and when your debarment becomes effective, you will be 
prohibited from participating in activities associated with or 
related to the schools and libraries support mechanism for three 
years from the date of debarment.\18\ The Bureau may, if necessary 
to protect the public interest, extend the debarment period.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ Second Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 9225, para. 67; 47 
CFR 54.8(d), 54.8(g).
    \19\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Please direct any response, if by messenger or hand delivery, to 
Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 236 
Massachusetts Avenue, NE., Suite 110, Washington, DC 20002, to the 
attention of Diana Lee, Attorney Advisor, Investigations and 
Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau, Room 4-C330, with a copy to 
Vickie Robinson, Assistant Chief, Investigations and Hearings 
Division, Enforcement Bureau, Room 4-C330, Federal Communications 
Commission. If sent by commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. 
Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail), the response should 
be sent to the Federal Communications Commission, 9300 East Hampton 
Drive, Capitol Heights, Maryland 20743. If sent by first-class, 
Express, or Priority mail, the response should be sent to Diana Lee, 
Attorney Advisor, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement 
Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., 
Room 4-C330, Washington, DC 20554, with a copy to Vickie Robinson, 
Assistant Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement 
Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., 
Room 4-C330, Washington, DC 20554. You shall also transmit a copy of 
the response via email to diana.lee@fcc.gov and to 
vickie.robinson@fcc.gov.
    If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Lee via mail, by 
telephone at (202) 418-1420 or by e-mail at diana.lee@fcc.gov. If 
Ms. Lee is unavailable, you may contact Ms. Vickie Robinson, 
Assistant Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, by telephone 
at (202) 418-1420 and by e-mail at vickie.robinson@fcc.gov.

 Sincerely yours,

Hillary S. DeNigro,
Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau.

cc: Kristy Carroll, Esq., Universal Service Administrative Company 
(via e-mail); Michael Wood, Antitrust Division, United States 
Department of Justice (via mail)

[FR Doc. E8-12832 Filed 6-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.