Airworthiness Directives; Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. Model PC-6 Airplanes, 32497-32499 [E8-12816]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 111 / Monday, June 9, 2008 / Proposed Rules
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by
removing Amendment 39–15520 (73 FR
26318; May 9, 2008), and adding the
following new AD:
EADS SOCATA: Docket No. FAA–2008–
0627; Directorate Identifier 2008–CE–
033–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by July 9,
2008.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD supersedes AD 2008–10–13,
Amendment 39–15520.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Models TBM 700
airplanes, serial numbers 434 through 455,
certificated in any category.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association of America
(ATA) Code 24: Electric Power.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
A rupture of the alternator and vapour
cycle cooling system pulley drive assembly
has reportedly been found. Such a failure
could lead to the loss of the alternator and
vapour cycle cooling systems and could also
cause mechanical damage inside the
powerplant compartment.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:31 Jun 06, 2008
Jkt 214001
To address this condition, AD 2008–0063–
E had been published to require a check of
the pulley drive assembly for leakage and, as
an interim action, removal of the compressor
drive belt from the assembly, and adoption
of a new operational procedure to keep the
air-conditioning system deactivated.
This AD retains the requirements of AD
2008–0063–E which is superseded,
introduces a mandatory terminating action
which consists in replacing the original
pulley drive assembly by a new one of an
improved design—corresponding to the
EADS SOCATA modification MOD 70–0231–
21—that permits reinstallation of the
compressor drive belt.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following
before further flight after May 9, 2008 (the
compliance date retained from AD 2008–10–
13):
(1) Position to ‘‘OFF’’ the air-conditioning
‘‘AIR COND’’ switch.
(2) Inspect for oil leakage in the pulley
drive assembly by following EADS SOCATA
Service Bulletin (SB) No. 70–156
Amendment 1, dated March 2008.
(i) If any leak is found, before further flight
after the inspection, replace the pulley drive
assembly part number (P/N)
T700G215504900000 with P/N
T700G215505710000 following EADS
SOCATA Service Bulletin (SB) No. 70–156
Amendment 1, dated March 2008.
(ii) If no leak is found, before further flight,
remove the compressor drive belt from the
pulley drive assembly following either EADS
SOCATA Service Bulletin (SB) No. 70–156,
original issue; or EADS SOCATA Service
Bulletin (SB) No. 70–156, Amendment 1;
both dated March 2008.
(3) The air-conditioning ‘‘AIR COND’’
switch must be in the ‘‘OFF’’ position and
the compressor drive belt must remain
removed until the pulley drive assembly part
number (P/N) T700G215504900000 is
replaced with P/N T700G215505710000
following EADS SOCATA Service Bulletin
(SB) No. 70–156 Amendment 1, dated March
2008. This replacement must be done before
further flight if any leak is found and may be
done at any time as terminating action to this
AD.
(g) Within the next 12 months after the
effective date of this AD, unless already
done, replace the pulley drive assembly P/N
T700G215504900000 with P/N
T700G215505710000 and reinstall the
compressor drive belt, following EADS
SOCATA Service Bulletin (SB) No. 70–156
Amendment 1, dated March 2008.
FAA AD Differences
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/
or service information as follows: No
differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(h) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, Standards Office,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
32497
ATTN: Albert Mercado, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106;
telephone: (816) 329–4119; fax: (816) 329–
4090. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector
(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District
Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
Special Flight Permit
(i) Under 14 CFR 39.23, we are limiting the
special flight permits for the check of
equipment of this AD under the following
condition: The air-conditioning ‘‘AIR-COND’’
switch is set to the ‘‘OFF’’ position.
Related Information
(j) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA) Emergency AD No.: 2008–
0067–E, dated April 3, 2008, and EADS
SOCATA Service Bulletin (SB) No. 70–156
Amendment 1, dated March 2008, for related
information.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on June 2,
2008.
David R. Showers,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–12818 Filed 6–6–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2008–0626; Directorate
Identifier 2008–CE–035–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Pilatus
Aircraft Ltd. Model PC–6 Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed
AD results from mandatory continuing
E:\FR\FM\09JNP1.SGM
09JNP1
32498
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 111 / Monday, June 9, 2008 / Proposed Rules
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is
prompted due to the discovery of loose selflocking stop nuts Part Number (P/N)
938.07.65.105 in the tail landing gear fastener
assemblies of some PC–6 aircraft.
It is believed that this occurrence could
also exist in other fastener assemblies using
nuts P/N 938.07.65.105 at various identified
locations in the aircraft.
If left uncorrected, the identified
assemblies may become loose and not
function as designed and could lead to
hazardous situations.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
The proposed AD would require
actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by July 9, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(telephone (800) 647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901
Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329–
4059; fax: (816) 329–4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:31 Jun 06, 2008
Jkt 214001
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2008–0626; Directorate Identifier
2008–CE–035–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued EASA AD No.:
2008–0083, dated May 5, 2008 (referred
to after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct
an unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is
prompted due to the discovery of loose selflocking stop nuts Part Number (P/N)
938.07.65.105 in the tail landing gear fastener
assemblies of some PC–6 aircraft.
It is believed that this occurrence could
also exist in other fastener assemblies using
nuts P/N 938.07.65.105 at various identified
locations in the aircraft.
If left uncorrected, the identified
assemblies may become loose and not
function as designed and could lead to
hazardous situations.
In order to prevent those conditions, the
present AD requires you replace self-locking
stop nuts P/N 938.07.65.105 from the Tail
Landing Gear Assembly, the Parachute Cable
Assembly, the Water Tank Assembly, the
Cable Tensioner Assembly, the Fuel Filter
Assembly, the Hydraulic Pump Assembly
and the Engine Mounts Assembly in
accordance with Pilatus PC–6 Service
Bulletin No. 53–002 Revision 2.
You may obtain further information
by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.
Relevant Service Information
Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. has issued Pilatus
PC–6 Service Bulletin Number 53–002,
Revision No. 2, dated September 24,
2007. The actions described in this
service information are intended to
correct the unsafe condition identified
in the MCAI.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of the Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with this State of
Design Authority, they have notified us
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all
information and determined the unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Differences Between This Proposed AD
and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have proposed
different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA
policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the
proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
will affect 50 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it would take
about 7 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of
this proposed AD. The average labor
rate is $80 per work-hour. Required
parts would cost about $310 per
product.
Based on these figures, we estimate
the cost of the proposed AD on U.S.
operators to be $43,500, or $870 per
product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
E:\FR\FM\09JNP1.SGM
09JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 111 / Monday, June 9, 2008 / Proposed Rules
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
Pilatus Aircraft Ltd.: Docket No. FAA–2008–
0626; Directorate Identifier 2008–CE–
035–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by July 9,
2008.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to PC–6, PC–6–H1, PC–
6–H2, PC–6/350, PC–6/350–H1, PC–6/350–
H2, PC–6/A, PC–6/A–H1, PC–6/A–H2, PC–6/
B–H2, PC–6/B1–H2, PC–6/B2–H2, PC–6/B2–
H4, PC–6/C–H2, and PC–6/C1–H2 airplanes,
manufacturer serial numbers (MSN) MSN
101 through MSN 949 and MSN 2001
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:31 Jun 06, 2008
Jkt 214001
through MSN 2092, certificated in any
category.
Note 1: These airplanes may also be
identified as Fairchild Republic Company
PC–6 airplanes, Fairchild Heli Porter PC–6
airplanes, or Fairchild-Hiller Corporation
PC–6 airplanes.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association of America
(ATA) Code 53: Fuselage.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is
prompted due to the discovery of loose selflocking stop nuts Part Number (P/N)
938.07.65.105 in the tail landing gear fastener
assemblies of some PC–6 aircraft.
It is believed that this occurrence could
also exist in other fastener assemblies using
nuts P/N 938.07.65.105 at various identified
locations in the aircraft.
If left uncorrected, the identified
assemblies may become loose and not
function as designed and could lead to
hazardous situations.
In order to prevent those conditions, the
present AD requires you replace self-locking
stop nuts P/N 938.07.65.105 from the Tail
Landing Gear Assembly, the Parachute Cable
Assembly, the Water Tank Assembly, the
Cable Tensioner Assembly, the Fuel Filter
Assembly, the Hydraulic Pump Assembly
and the Engine Mounts Assembly in
accordance with Pilatus PC–6 Service
Bulletin No. 53–002 Revision 2.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following
actions:
(1) Within the next 12 months after the
effective date of this AD, inspect and modify
the fastener assemblies as instructed in
paragraph 3 of Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. Pilatus
PC–6 Service Bulletin Number 53–002,
Revision No. 2, dated September 24, 2007.
(2) After the effective date of this AD, no
person shall install on any PC–6 series
aircraft, water tank assemblies and hydraulic
pump assemblies, unless they have been
previously modified following paragraph 4 of
Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. Pilatus PC–6 Service
Bulletin Number 53–002, Revision No. 2,
dated September 24, 2007.
FAA AD Differences
Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI
and/or service information as follows: No
differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, Standards Office,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to
ATTN: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106;
telephone: (816) 329–4059; fax: (816) 329–
4090. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
32499
notify your appropriate principal inspector
(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District
Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation
Safety Agency EASA AD No.: 2008–0083,
dated May 5, 2008; and Pilatus Aircraft Ltd.
Pilatus PC–6 Service Bulletin Number 53–
002, Revision No. 2, dated September 24,
2007, for related information.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on June 3,
2008.
David R. Showers,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–12816 Filed 6–6–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG–124590–07]
RIN 1545–BG11
Guidance Regarding Foreign Base
Company Sales Income; Hearing
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of public hearing on
proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document provides
notice of public hearing on proposed
regulations that provide guidance
relating to foreign base company sales
income, as defined in section 954(d), in
cases in which personal property sold
by a controlled foreign corporation
(CFC) is manufactured, produced, or
constructed pursuant to a contract
manufacturing arrangement or by one or
more branches of the CFC.
DATES: The public hearing is being held
on Tuesday, July 29, 2008, at 10 a.m.
The IRS must receive outlines of the
topics to be discussed at the public
hearing by Tuesday, July 8, 2008.
E:\FR\FM\09JNP1.SGM
09JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 111 (Monday, June 9, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 32497-32499]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-12816]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2008-0626; Directorate Identifier 2008-CE-035-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. Model PC-6
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing
[[Page 32498]]
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is prompted due to the
discovery of loose self-locking stop nuts Part Number (P/N)
938.07.65.105 in the tail landing gear fastener assemblies of some
PC-6 aircraft.
It is believed that this occurrence could also exist in other
fastener assemblies using nuts P/N 938.07.65.105 at various
identified locations in the aircraft.
If left uncorrected, the identified assemblies may become loose
and not function as designed and could lead to hazardous situations.
The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address
the unsafe condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by July 9, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone: (816) 329-4059; fax: (816) 329-4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2008-0626;
Directorate Identifier 2008-CE-035-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
AD No.: 2008-0083, dated May 5, 2008 (referred to after this as ``the
MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The
MCAI states:
This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is prompted due to the
discovery of loose self-locking stop nuts Part Number (P/N)
938.07.65.105 in the tail landing gear fastener assemblies of some
PC-6 aircraft.
It is believed that this occurrence could also exist in other
fastener assemblies using nuts P/N 938.07.65.105 at various
identified locations in the aircraft.
If left uncorrected, the identified assemblies may become loose
and not function as designed and could lead to hazardous situations.
In order to prevent those conditions, the present AD requires
you replace self-locking stop nuts P/N 938.07.65.105 from the Tail
Landing Gear Assembly, the Parachute Cable Assembly, the Water Tank
Assembly, the Cable Tensioner Assembly, the Fuel Filter Assembly,
the Hydraulic Pump Assembly and the Engine Mounts Assembly in
accordance with Pilatus PC-6 Service Bulletin No. 53-002 Revision 2.
You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.
Relevant Service Information
Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. has issued Pilatus PC-6 Service Bulletin
Number 53-002, Revision No. 2, dated September 24, 2007. The actions
described in this service information are intended to correct the
unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, they
have notified us of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and
service information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because
we evaluated all information and determined the unsafe condition exists
and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type
design.
Differences Between This Proposed AD and the MCAI or Service
Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD will affect 50 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would take about 7 work-hours per
product to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The
average labor rate is $80 per work-hour. Required parts would cost
about $310 per product.
Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on
U.S. operators to be $43,500, or $870 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
[[Page 32499]]
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
Pilatus Aircraft Ltd.: Docket No. FAA-2008-0626; Directorate
Identifier 2008-CE-035-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by July 9, 2008.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to PC-6, PC-6-H1, PC-6-H2, PC-6/350, PC-6/
350-H1, PC-6/350-H2, PC-6/A, PC-6/A-H1, PC-6/A-H2, PC-6/B-H2, PC-6/
B1-H2, PC-6/B2-H2, PC-6/B2-H4, PC-6/C-H2, and PC-6/C1-H2 airplanes,
manufacturer serial numbers (MSN) MSN 101 through MSN 949 and MSN
2001 through MSN 2092, certificated in any category.
Note 1: These airplanes may also be identified as Fairchild
Republic Company PC-6 airplanes, Fairchild Heli Porter PC-6
airplanes, or Fairchild-Hiller Corporation PC-6 airplanes.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 53:
Fuselage.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is prompted due to the
discovery of loose self-locking stop nuts Part Number (P/N)
938.07.65.105 in the tail landing gear fastener assemblies of some
PC-6 aircraft.
It is believed that this occurrence could also exist in other
fastener assemblies using nuts P/N 938.07.65.105 at various
identified locations in the aircraft.
If left uncorrected, the identified assemblies may become loose
and not function as designed and could lead to hazardous situations.
In order to prevent those conditions, the present AD requires
you replace self-locking stop nuts P/N 938.07.65.105 from the Tail
Landing Gear Assembly, the Parachute Cable Assembly, the Water Tank
Assembly, the Cable Tensioner Assembly, the Fuel Filter Assembly,
the Hydraulic Pump Assembly and the Engine Mounts Assembly in
accordance with Pilatus PC-6 Service Bulletin No. 53-002 Revision 2.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following actions:
(1) Within the next 12 months after the effective date of this
AD, inspect and modify the fastener assemblies as instructed in
paragraph 3 of Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. Pilatus PC-6 Service Bulletin
Number 53-002, Revision No. 2, dated September 24, 2007.
(2) After the effective date of this AD, no person shall install
on any PC-6 series aircraft, water tank assemblies and hydraulic
pump assemblies, unless they have been previously modified following
paragraph 4 of Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. Pilatus PC-6 Service Bulletin
Number 53-002, Revision No. 2, dated September 24, 2007.
FAA AD Differences
Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small
Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone: (816) 329-4059; fax: (816) 329-4090. Before using
any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify
your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight
Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency EASA AD No.:
2008-0083, dated May 5, 2008; and Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. Pilatus PC-6
Service Bulletin Number 53-002, Revision No. 2, dated September 24,
2007, for related information.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on June 3, 2008.
David R. Showers,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-12816 Filed 6-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P