Television Broadcasting Services; Riverside, CA, 32241-32242 [E8-12750]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 110 / Friday, June 6, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Document for Correcting Common VOC
& Other Rule Deficiencies,’’ EPA Region
9, August 21, 2001).
B. Does the rule meet the evaluation
criteria?
We believe this rule is consistent with
the relevant policy and guidance
regarding enforceability and SIP
relaxations. The TSD has more
information on our evaluation.
C. EPA Recommendations To Further
Improve the Rule
The TSD describes additional rule
revisions that do not affect EPA’s
current action but are recommended for
the next time the local agency modifies
the rule.
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with RULES
D. Public Comment and Final Action
As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of
the Act, EPA is fully approving the
submitted rule because we believe it
fulfills all relevant requirements. We do
not think anyone will object to this
approval, so we are finalizing it without
proposing it in advance. However, in
the Proposed Rules section of this
Federal Register, we are simultaneously
proposing approval of the same
submitted rule. If we receive adverse
comments by July 7, 2008, we will
publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register to notify the public
that the direct final approval will not
take effect and we will address the
comments in a subsequent final action
based on the proposal. If we do not
receive timely adverse comments, the
direct final approval will be effective
without further notice on August 5,
2008. This will incorporate the rule into
the federally enforceable SIP.
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
state choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely
approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:56 Jun 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the State, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
32241
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by August 5, 2008.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this action for
the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements (see section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: April 11, 2008.
Jane Diamond,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
I
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F—California
2. Section 52.220 is amended by
adding paragraphs (c)(255)(i)(A)(6) to
read as follows:
I
§ 52.220
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(255) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(6) Rule 105, Emission Statement,
adopted on April 20, 1993, and
amended September 5, 1996.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E8–12474 Filed 6–5–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73
[DA 08–1185; MB Docket No. 08–30; RM–
11419]
Television Broadcasting Services;
Riverside, CA
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\06JNR1.SGM
06JNR1
32242
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 110 / Friday, June 6, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with RULES
SUMMARY: This document grants a
channel substitution for KRCA–DT,
Riverside, California, from Channel 45
to Channel 35.
DATES: The channel substitution is
effective July 5, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shaun A. Maher, Media Bureau, (202)
418–1600.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
synopsis of the Commission’s Report
and Order, MB Docket No. 08–30,
adopted May 21, 2008, and released
May 21, 2008. The full text of this
Commission decision is available for
inspection and copying during normal
business hours in the FCC’s Reference
Information Center at Portals II, CY–
A257, 445 Twelfth Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20554. This document
may also be purchased from the
Commission’s duplicating contractors,
Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th
Street, SW., Room CY–B402,
Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1–
800–378–3160 or via e-mail
www.BCPIWEB.com. This document
does not contain proposed information
collection requirements subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13. In addition,
therefore, it does not contain any
proposed information collection burden
‘‘for small business concerns with fewer
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:56 Jun 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
than 25 employees,’’ pursuant to the
Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of
2002, Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(4). Provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of l980 do not apply to
this proceeding.
The Commission will send a copy of
this Report and Order in a report to be
sent to Congress and the Government
Accountability Office pursuant to the
Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C.
801(a)(1)(A).
§ 73.622 Digital television table of
allotments.
*
*
*
(i) * * *
*
*
Community
*
*
Channel
*
*
*
*
*
*
CALIFORNIA:
*
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73
*
Riverside ........................
35
Television, Television broadcasting.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Federal Communications
Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR
part 73 as follows:
I
PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST
SERVICES
*
*
*
Barbara A. Kreisman,
Chief, Video Division, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. E8–12750 Filed 6–5–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
1. The authority citation for part 73
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336.
2. Section 73.622(i), the posttransition DTV Table of Allotments is
amended by revising the entry for
‘‘Riverside’’ under ‘‘California’’ to read
as follows:
I
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
Federal Communications Commission.
I
PO 00000
*
E:\FR\FM\06JNR1.SGM
06JNR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 110 (Friday, June 6, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 32241-32242]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-12750]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73
[DA 08-1185; MB Docket No. 08-30; RM-11419]
Television Broadcasting Services; Riverside, CA
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 32242]]
SUMMARY: This document grants a channel substitution for KRCA-DT,
Riverside, California, from Channel 45 to Channel 35.
DATES: The channel substitution is effective July 5, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shaun A. Maher, Media Bureau, (202)
418-1600.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's
Report and Order, MB Docket No. 08-30, adopted May 21, 2008, and
released May 21, 2008. The full text of this Commission decision is
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in
the FCC's Reference Information Center at Portals II, CY-A257, 445
Twelfth Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554. This document may also be
purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractors, Best Copy and
Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC
20554, telephone 1-800-378-3160 or via e-mail www.BCPIWEB.com. This
document does not contain proposed information collection requirements
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. In
addition, therefore, it does not contain any proposed information
collection burden ``for small business concerns with fewer than 25
employees,'' pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of
2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4). Provisions of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act of l980 do not apply to this proceeding.
The Commission will send a copy of this Report and Order in a
report to be sent to Congress and the Government Accountability Office
pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73
Television, Television broadcasting.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal Communications
Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR part 73 as follows:
PART 73--RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES
0
1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336.
0
2. Section 73.622(i), the post-transition DTV Table of Allotments is
amended by revising the entry for ``Riverside'' under ``California'' to
read as follows:
Sec. 73.622 Digital television table of allotments.
* * * * *
(i) * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Community Channel
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
CALIFORNIA:
* * * * *
Riverside............................. 35
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Federal Communications Commission.
Barbara A. Kreisman,
Chief, Video Division, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. E8-12750 Filed 6-5-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
