Inspection of Records Relating to Depiction of Simulated Sexually Explicit Performances, 32262-32273 [E8-12635]
Download as PDF
32262
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 110 / Friday, June 6, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Federal Register publication.2 Three
letters generally favored the proposed
regulations and seven letters were
generally opposed to their adoption. An
Agricultural Forum held by the
Commission on April 22, 2008 served as
an additional venue for the presentation
of views with respect to the proposed
rulemaking and a related Commission
proposal to revise the Federal
speculative position limits delineated in
Commission regulation 150.2.3
Collectively, the comments received
in response to the proposed rulemaking
and at the Commission’s April 22
Agricultural Forum reflected differing
perspectives on a wide range of issues
of substantive import to the proposed
rulemaking. The issues covered by the
commenters, both in favor and opposed
to the Commission’s proposal to adopt
a risk management exemption from the
Federal speculative position limits,
included product margin requirements,
the convergence of cash and futures
transaction prices, the impact of
commodity-linked instruments traded
on national securities exchanges on
CFTC regulated transactions, the degree
of transparency for market participation,
and the quantification of the impact of
speculative trading on market volatility.
In light of the wide range of divergent
positions that have been put forth by
interested parties, the current market
conditions for the contracts that would
be affected by the proposed rulemaking,
and in order to determine whether
further consensus among the affected
parties should be sought, the
Commission has determined to
withdraw the proposed rulemaking
pending further consideration of the
relevant issues.
Issued by the Commission June 2, 2008, in
Washington, DC.
David Stawick,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. E8–12723 Filed 6–5–08; 8:45 am]
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
BILLING CODE 6351–01–P
2 Federal Register Comment File 07–015,
available at https://www.cftc.gov/lawandregulation/
federalregister/federalregistercomments/2007/07–
015.html.
3 Revision of Federal Speculative Position Limits,
72 FR 65483 (November 21, 2007) (to be
withdrawn).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
11:59 Jun 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
28 CFR Part 75
[Docket No. CRM 105; AG Order No. 2966–
2008]
RIN 1105–AB19
Inspection of Records Relating to
Depiction of Simulated Sexually
Explicit Performances
Department of Justice.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This rule proposes to amend
record-keeping, labeling, and inspection
requirements to implement provisions
of the Adam Walsh Child Protection and
Safety Act of 2006 that require
producers of depictions of simulated
sexually explicit conduct to maintain
records documenting that performers in
those depictions are at least 18 years of
age. The rule also implements
provisions of the Adam Walsh Act that
create a certification regime for the
exemption of producers, in certain
circumstances, from those requirements
and from similar requirements for
producers of visual depictions of the
lascivious exhibition of the genitals or
pubic area of a person.
DATES: Written comments must be
received by August 5, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be
submitted to: Andrew Oosterbaan,
Chief, Child Exploitation and Obscenity
Section, Criminal Division, United
States Department of Justice,
Washington, DC 20530; Attn: ‘‘Docket
No. CRM 105.’’
Comments may be submitted
electronically to www.regulations.gov by
using the electronic comment form
provided on that site. Comments
submitted electronically must include
‘‘Docket No. CRM 105’’ in the subject
box. You may also view an electronic
version of this rule at the
www.regulations.gov site.
Facsimile comments may be
submitted to: (202) 514–1793. This is
not a toll-free number. Comments
submitted by facsimile must include
‘‘Docket No. CRM 105’’ on the cover
sheet.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andrew Oosterbaan, Chief, Child
Exploitation and Obscenity Section,
Criminal Division, United States
Department of Justice, Washington, DC
20530; (202) 514–5780. This is not a
toll-free number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Comments
Please note that because the
Department of Justice is now fully
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
operational using the
www.regulations.gov site, the Child
Exploitation and Obscenity Section,
Criminal Division has deactivated the
e-mail address for electronic comments
that it published in rulemakings before
the Department started using
www.regulations.gov. In order to ensure
that electronic comments are received
by the Department, commenters
submitting electronic comments must
use the electronic comment form
provided on the www.regulations.gov
site.
Please also note that all comments
received are considered part of the
public record and made available for
public inspection online at
www.regulations.gov. Such information
includes personal identifying
information (such as your name,
address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by
the commenter.
If you want to submit personal
identifying information (such as your
name, address, etc.) as part of your
comment, but do not want it to be
posted online, you must include the
phrase ‘‘PERSONAL IDENTIFYING
INFORMATION’’ in the first paragraph
of your comment. You also must locate
all the personal identifying information
you do not want posted online in the
first paragraph of your comment and
identify in that paragraph what
information you want redacted.
If you want to submit confidential
business information as part of your
comment but do not want it to be posted
online, you must include the phrase
‘‘CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS
INFORMATION’’ in the first paragraph
of your comment. You also must
identify prominently any confidential
business information to be redacted
within the comment. If a comment has
so much confidential business
information that it cannot be effectively
redacted, all or part of that comment
might not be posted on
www.regulations.gov.
Personal identifying information
identified and located as set forth above
will be placed in the agency’s public
docket file, but not posted online.
Confidential business information
identified and located as set forth above
will not be placed in the public docket
file. If you wish to inspect the agency’s
public docket file in person by
appointment, please see the ‘‘For
Additional Information’’ paragraph.
Discussion
On July 27, 2006, President George W.
Bush signed into law the Adam Walsh
Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006,
Public Law 109–248 (‘‘the Act’’). As
described in more detail below, section
E:\FR\FM\06JNP1.SGM
06JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 110 / Friday, June 6, 2008 / Proposed Rules
503(a) of the Act provides that
producers of visual depictions of
simulated sexually explicit conduct
‘‘shall create and maintain individually
identifiable records pertaining to every
performer portrayed in such a visual
depiction.’’ 18 U.S.C. 2257A(a).
The Act requires producers of visual
depictions of simulated sexually
explicit conduct to:
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
(1) Ascertain, by examination of an
identification document containing such
information, the performer’s name and date
of birth, and require the performer to provide
such other indicia of his or her identity as
may be prescribed by regulations;
(2) Ascertain any name, other than the
performer’s present and correct name, ever
used by the performer including maiden
name, alias, nickname, stage, or professional
name; and
(3) Record * * * the information required
by paragraphs (1) and (2) of this subsection
and such other identifying information as
may be prescribed by regulation.
Id. 2257A(b).
Furthermore, the Act requires that
producers of material covered by the
statute ‘‘shall maintain the records
* * * at their business premises, or at
such other place as the Attorney General
may by regulation prescribe and shall
make such records available to the
Attorney General for inspection at all
reasonable times.’’ Id. 2257A(c).
Producers also must ‘‘cause to be affixed
to’’ matter containing the visual
depictions covered by section 2257A ‘‘a
statement describing where the records
required by this section with respect to
all performers depicted in that copy of
the matter may be located,’’ Id.
2257A(e)(1), and the Act makes it
illegal, inter alia, ‘‘for any person
knowingly to sell or otherwise transfer,
or offer for sale or transfer’’ any such
matter ‘‘which does not have affixed
thereto * * * a statement describing
where the records required by this
section may be located,’’ id. 2257A(f)(4).
Violation of these requirements is a
misdemeanor, subject to imprisonment
for not more than one year, a criminal
fine, or both. See id. 2257A(i)(1).
The Act also created an exemption
from the record-keeping requirements of
section 2257A. One part of this
exemption states that section 2257A
does not apply to matter that (1) is
intended for commercial distribution,
(2) is created as a part of a commercial
enterprise by a person who certifies to
the Attorney General that he regularly
and in the normal course of business
collects and maintains individually
identifiable name and age information
regarding all performers for purposes
such as Federal and State tax, labor, and
other laws, and (3) is not produced,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:32 Jun 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
32263
marketed, or otherwise made available
in circumstances such that an ordinary
person would conclude that it is child
pornography. See id. 2257A(h)(1)(A).
The other part of this exemption states
that section 2257A does not apply to
matter that (1) is produced by someone
subject to the authority and regulation
of the Federal Communications
Commission enforcing federal bans on
the broadcast of obscene, indecent, or
profane programming, and (2) is created
as a part of a commercial enterprise by
a person who certifies to the Attorney
General that he regularly and in the
normal course of business collects and
maintains individually identifiable
name and age information regarding all
performers, for purposes such as federal
and state tax, labor, and other laws. See
id. 2257A(h)(1)(B).
The Act also permits such a
certification for producers of visual
depictions of the lascivious exhibition
of the genitals or pubic area of a person
(hereinafter ‘‘lascivious exhibition’’) for
which record-keeping, inspection, and
labeling requirements apply under 18
U.S.C. 2257. See id. 2257A(h)(1)(A), (B).
Section 2257 requires that producers of
depictions of actual sexually explicit
conduct maintain identity and age
records for performers in those
depictions, and the Act amended
section 2257, inter alia, to cover
lascivious exhibition. See id. 2257(h)(1)
(as amended by section 502(a)(4) of the
Act).
circumstances. (The language of section
2257A is based largely on the language
in section 2257, but only the former
contains the exemption and certification
regime described above.) The recordkeeping, inspection, and labeling
requirements in sections 2257 and
2257A are designed to ensure that no
minor will be exploited through
depictions of actual or simulated
sexually explicit conduct, whether
produced deliberately or negligently.
Chapter 110 of title 18 (‘‘Sexual
Exploitation and Other Abuse of
Children’’) covers both actual and
simulated sexually explicit conduct.
Specifically, it defines ‘‘sexually
explicit conduct’’ as:
Background
In enacting section 2257 in 1988,
Congress imposed record-keeping
requirements related to visual
depictions of actual sexually explicit
conduct. Section 2257 has been critical
to protecting children from exploitation
as performers in visual depictions of
sexually explicit conduct. Children are
incapable of giving voluntary and
knowing consent to perform in such
depictions. The consequences to
children depicted in them are
devastating and can follow them for
years or even their entire lives.
Furthermore, viewers of such depictions
themselves may sexually abuse
children, and pedophiles use such
depictions to feed their predilections
and to groom potential victims.
Performers in such depictions therefore
must not be minors.
In the Act, Congress filled two gaps
left by the original statute by amending
section 2257 to cover lascivious
exhibition and by enacting section
2257A to cover simulated sexually
explicit conduct, while at the same time
creating an exemption from these new
record-keeping requirements in certain
18 U.S.C. 2256(2) (emphases added).
The terms ‘‘simulated’’ and ‘‘actual’’
also appear together in numerous States’
child-exploitation statutes. See Alaska
Stat. § 11.41.455; Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13–
3551; Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13–3553; Ark.
Code Ann. § 5–27–302; Cal. Penal Code
§ 311.11; Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18–6–403;
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a–193; Fla. Stat.
§ 827.071; Ga. Code Ann. § 16–12–100;
Idaho Code Ann. § 18–1507; 720 Ill.
Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/11–20.1; Kan. Stat.
Ann. § 21–3516; Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann.
§ 531.300; La. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 14:81.1;
Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 272 § 29C; Mich.
Comp. Laws Serv. § 750.145c; Minn.
Stat. § 617.246; Miss. Code Ann. § 97–5–
33; Mo. Rev. Stat. § 573.010; Mont. Code
Ann. § 45–5–625; Nev. Rev. Stat.
§ 200.725; N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 649–
A:2; N.M. Stat. Ann. § 30–6A–3; N.Y.
Penal L. § 263.00; N.D. Cent. Code
§ 12.1–27.2–01; Okla. Stat. tit. 21
§ 1024.1; Or. Rev. Stat. § 163.665; R.I.
Gen. Laws § 11–9–1.3; S.D. Codified
Laws § 22–24A–2; S.D. Codified Laws
§ 22–24A–3; Tenn. Code Ann. § 39–17–
1003; Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 43.25;
Utah Code Ann. § 76–5a–2; Utah Code
Ann. § 76–5a–3; Va. Code Ann. § 18.2–
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(A) * * * actual or simulated—(i) sexual
intercourse, including genital-genital, oralgenital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether
between persons of the same or opposite sex;
(ii) bestiality; (iii) masturbation; (iv) sadistic
or masochistic abuse; or (v) lascivious
exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any
person; (B) For purposes of subsection 8(B)
of this section [part of the definition of ‘‘child
pornography’’], ‘‘sexually explicit conduct’’
means—(i) graphic sexual intercourse,
including genital-genital, oral-genital, analgenital, or oral-anal, whether between
persons of the same or opposite sex, or
lascivious simulated sexual intercourse
where the genitals, breast, or pubic area of
any person is exhibited; (ii) graphic or
lascivious simulated; (I) bestiality; (II)
masturbation; or (III) sadistic or masochistic
abuse; or (iii) graphic or simulated lascivious
exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any
person.
E:\FR\FM\06JNP1.SGM
06JNP1
32264
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 110 / Friday, June 6, 2008 / Proposed Rules
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
390; Wash. Rev. Code § 9.68A.011; W.
Va. Code § 61–8C–1; Wis. Stat. § 948.01;
Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6–4–303. Accordingly,
‘‘simulated’’ in the context of sexually
explicit conduct is neither a novel nor
an uncommon term.
These statutes recognize that a child
may be harmed both physically and
psychologically in the production of
visual depictions of simulated sexually
explicit conduct, even if no sexually
explicit conduct actually takes place.
Furthermore, producers of visual
depictions of actual sexually explicit
conduct often substitute a visual
depiction of simulated sexually explicit
conduct (so-called ‘‘soft-core’’
pornography) in place of the actual
sexually explicit conduct; then the softcore pornography is often distributed
more widely than the unedited version
of the same production. In such cases,
the protection of children from
exploitation in the production of a
visual depiction of actual sexually
explicit conduct necessitates that
producers of visual depictions of
simulated sexually explicit conduct also
be required to maintain records and
label their products.
The Proposed Rule
Section 2257’s requirements are
implemented in 28 CFR part 75. On July
12, 2007, the Department of Justice (‘‘the
Department’’) published a proposed rule
amending part 75 to implement those
provisions of the Act that amended
section 2257. See Revised Regulations
for Records Relating to Visual
Depictions of Sexually Explicit Conduct
[CRM Docket No. 104; RIN 1105–AB18],
72 FR 38033 (Jul. 12, 2007).
This proposed rule would make
additional amendments to part 75 to
implement section 2257A. As explained
above, sections 2257 and 2257A operate
in tandem to protect children from
exploitation in visual depictions of
sexually explicit conduct. Part 75 has
undergone significant public comment
and several courts have found it to be
a constitutional exercise of
governmental authority. See Am.
Library Ass’n v. Reno, 33 F.3d 78 (DC
Cir. 1994); Free Speech Coalition v.
Gonzales, 406 F. Supp. 2d 1196 (D.
Colo. 2005) (‘‘Free Speech I’’); Free
Speech Coalition v. Gonzales, 483 F.
Supp. 2d 1069 (D. Colo. 2007) (‘‘Free
Speech II’’); Connection Distrib. Co. v.
Gonzales, 2006 WL 1305089, 2006 U.S.
Dist. LEXIS 29506 (N.D. Ohio, May 10,
2006). Although one court invalidated
part 75 as ultra vires to the extent it
regulated those whose activity ‘‘does not
involve hiring, contracting for
managing, or otherwise arranging for the
participation of the performers
VerDate Aug<31>2005
11:59 Jun 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
depicted,’’ see Sundance Assoc., Inc. v.
Reno, 139 F.3d 804, 806 (10th Cir. 1998)
(quoting 18 U.S.C. 2257(h)(3) (1998)),
Congress subsequently amended the
statute (see section 502(a)(4) of the Act)
and adopted the Attorney General’s
interpretation of section 2257. Cf. Free
Speech Coalition II, 483 F. Supp. 2d at
1076 (suggesting the enactment of
section 502 of the Act moots the
plaintiff’s ultra vires challenge to part
75).
Because part 75 has been tested and
upheld in the courts, and given the
similarities between sections 2257 and
2257A, the Department has chosen to
apply the existing requirements for
visual depictions of actual sexually
explicit conduct (under section 2257) to
visual depictions of simulated sexually
explicit conduct (under section 2257A)
with regard to the records at issue, the
time, place and manner of inspection of
those records, and the labeling of matter
containing such visual depictions. The
proposed rule therefore proposes to
change references in the Department’s
part 75 regulations (as proposed in CRM
Docket No. 104; RIN 1105–AB18) from
‘‘actual sexually explicit conduct’’ to
‘‘actual or simulated sexually explicit
conduct,’’ where appropriate, and to
make other minor textual changes as
necessary to regulate simulated sexually
explicit conduct.
This proposed rule also makes two
additional changes to part 75 to
implement section 2257A: it defines
‘‘simulated sexually explicit conduct’’
and it implements a certification regime
for producers of actual sexually explicit
conduct constituting lascivious
exhibition and for producers of
simulated sexually explicit conduct.
Definition of ‘‘simulated sexually
explicit conduct’’
As noted above, ‘‘sexually explicit
conduct’’ is defined in section
2256(2)(A) with reference to certain
physical acts and with reference to both
‘‘actual’’ and ‘‘simulated’’ performance
of those acts. No definition of ‘‘actual’’
or ‘‘simulated’’ is contained in section
2256 or anywhere else in chapter 110.
When first published in 1990, amended
in 2005, and proposed to be amended in
2007, part 75 did not adopt a definition
of ‘‘actual,’’ because the Department
believed that in the context of the acts
described, the meaning of the term was
sufficiently precise for regulatory
purposes. Public comments on the
previous versions of part 75 did not
address the definition of ‘‘actual,’’ nor
has the meaning of that term arisen in
litigation regarding the regulations.
With the extension of part 75 to cover
simulated conduct, however, and with
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the statutory provision for a certification
regime for simulated conduct, the
Department believes that a definition of
the term ‘‘simulated sexually explicit
conduct’’ is necessary. A definition will
make clear to the public what types of
conduct come within the ambit of the
regulation, as distinct from conduct not
covered at all, and what types of
conduct will be eligible for the
certification regime.
The Department starts its analysis of
the proper definition of the term for
regulatory purposes with the term’s
plain meaning. The dictionary defines
‘‘simulated’’ as ‘‘made to look genuine.’’
Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary
1162 (11th ed. 2003).
The Department believes that an
objective standard—that is, one defined
in terms of a reasonable person viewing
the depiction—is appropriate to add to
this basic definition. The proposed
rule’s definition of ‘‘simulated sexually
explicit conduct’’ thus reads as follows:
‘‘[S]imulated sexually explicit conduct
means conduct engaged in by
performers in a visual depiction that is
intended to appear as if the performers
are engaged in actual sexually explicit
conduct and does so appear to a
reasonable viewer.’’
No federal court has interpreted the
definition of ‘‘simulated’’ in the context
of chapter 110. The definition above,
however, is based on the plain meaning
of the term and is supported by extrinsic
sources of meaning. Chapter 110 was
created by the Protection of Children
Against Sexual Exploitation Act of 1977,
which defined ‘‘sexually explicit
conduct’’ to include both ‘‘actual or
simulated’’ acts. See Protection of
Children Against Sexual Exploitation
Act of 1977, Public Law 95–225, § 2(a),
92 Stat. 7 (1978). That statute did not
define ‘‘simulated,’’ however, and the
legislative history of the act does not
indicate that Congress considered
defining that term. See S. Rep. No. 438,
95th Cong., 1st Sess. (1977); H.R. Report
No. 696, 95th Cong., 1st Sess. (1977).
When Congress amended chapter 110 in
1984, it considered defining
‘‘simulated’’ but ultimately did not do
so, thereby leaving the definition of that
term to the discretion of the Attorney
General.
As noted above, most states have laws
similar to the federal statute
criminalizing production, distribution,
and possession of simulated sexually
explicit conduct involving a minor. A
number of those states’ statutes, in
contrast to section 2257A, define
‘‘simulated,’’ and therefore may inform
the federal definition of that term in part
75. State definitions of ‘‘simulated’’
generally fall into three categories:
E:\FR\FM\06JNP1.SGM
06JNP1
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 110 / Friday, June 6, 2008 / Proposed Rules
(1) Definitions based on giving the
appearance of actual sexually explicit
conduct. For example: ‘‘An act is
simulated when it gives the appearance
of being sexual conduct.’’ Cal. Penal
Code § 311.4(d)(1); 14 V.I. Code
§ 1027(b). ‘‘‘Simulated sexually explicit
conduct’ means a feigned or pretended
act of sexually explicit conduct which
duplicates, within the perception of an
average person, the appearance of an
actual act of sexually explicit conduct.’’
Utah Code Ann. § 76–5a–2(9). ‘‘Sexual
intercourse is simulated when it depicts
explicit sexual intercourse which gives
the appearance of the consummation of
sexual intercourse, normal or
perverted.’’
Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 272, § 31; N.H.
Rev. Stat. Ann. § 649–A:2(III).
(2) Definitions based on depiction of
genitals that gives the impression of
actual sexually explicit conduct, such
as: ‘‘‘Simulated’ means any depicting of
the genitals or rectal areas that gives the
appearance of sexual conduct or
incipient sexual conduct.’’ Ariz. Rev.
Stat. § 13–3551(10); Miss. Code Ann.
§ 97–5–31(f); Mont. Code Ann. § 45–5–
620(2).
(3) Definitions based on (a) the
depiction of uncovered portions of the
body and (b) that gives the impression
of actual sexually explicit conduct, such
as: ‘‘‘Simulated’ means the explicit
depiction of [sexual] conduct
* * *which creates the appearance of
such conduct and which exhibits any
uncovered portion of the breasts,
genitals, or buttocks.’’ Fla. Stat.
§ 827.071(1)(i). ‘‘‘Simulated’ means the
explicit depiction of sexual conduct that
creates the appearance of actual sexual
conduct and during which a person
engaging in the conduct exhibits any
uncovered portion of the breasts,
genitals, or buttocks.’’ Tex. Penal Code
§ 43.25(a)(6). ‘‘‘Simulated’ means the
explicit depiction of any [sexual]
conduct * * * which creates the
appearance of such conduct and which
exhibits any uncovered portion of the
breasts, genitals or buttocks.’’ N.Y. Penal
L. § 263.00(6).
The definitions categorized above as
‘‘based on giving the appearance of
actual sexually explicit conduct’’ are
closest to that proposed by the
Department in this proposed rule. The
other two definitions, which require the
actual depiction of nudity, are overly
restrictive in that a child may be
exploited in the production of a visual
depiction of simulated sexually explicit
conduct even if no nudity is present in
the final version of the visual depiction.
The producer of the depiction may
arrange the camera or the body positions
to avoid depicting uncovered genitals,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
11:59 Jun 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
breasts, or buttocks yet still cause harm
to the child by having him or her
otherwise realistically appear to be
engaging in sexually explicit conduct.
It is also important to note that
‘‘simulated’’ in this context does not
mean ‘‘virtual.’’ For purposes of chapter
110, including sections 2256, 2257, and
2257A, and for purposes of part 75,
‘‘simulated sexual explicit conduct’’
means conduct engaged in by real
human beings, not conduct engaged in
by computer-generated images that only
appear to be real human beings.
Although Congress did attempt to
criminalize production, distribution,
and possession of ‘‘virtual’’ child
pornography on the basis that it
contributed to the market in child
pornography involving real children,
the Supreme Court held that the childprotection rationale for the
criminalization of child pornography
under Ferber did not apply to images in
which no real children were harmed.
See Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition,
535 U.S. 234, 250–51 (2002). Section
2257A does not cover such ‘‘virtual’’
child pornography, but rather
‘‘simulated’’ sexually explicit conduct,
the production of which, as noted
above, can exploit a real child. The
Court’s decision in Ashcroft is thus not
relevant to sections 2257 or 2257A, or
part 75, which for clarity’s sake
consistently refers to sexually explicit
conduct engaged in by an ‘‘actual
human being.’’
Exemption From Statutory
Requirements for Visual Depictions of
Lascivious Exhibition or Simulated
Sexually Explicit Conduct in Certain
Circumstances and an Associated
Certification Regime
As outlined above, Congress in the
Act filled two gaps left by the original
section 2257 by amending section 2257
to cover lascivious exhibition and by
enacting section 2257A to cover
simulated sexually explicit conduct. In
enacting section 2257A, Congress
determined it would be appropriate, in
certain circumstances, to exempt
producers of visual depictions of
lascivious exhibition (for which records
must be kept under section 2257, as
amended by the Act) and producers of
visual depictions of simulated sexually
explicit conduct (for which records
must be kept under section 2257A) from
statutory requirements otherwise
applicable to such visual depictions.
See 18 U.S.C. 2257A(h).
The safe harbor provision in the
statute in essence permits certain
producers of visual depictions of
lascivious exhibition or simulated
sexually explicit conduct to certify that
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
32265
in the normal course of business they
collect and maintain records to confirm
that performers in those depictions are
not minors, while not necessarily
collected and maintained in the format
required by part 75. Where a producer
makes the required certification, matter
containing such visual depictions is not
subject to the labeling requirements of
the statute.
The Department has crafted a
certification regime (described in detail
below) that implements the safe harbor
in such a way as to permit such
producers, in accordance with the
statute, to be subject to lesser recordkeeping burdens than those in part 75,
while still protecting children from
sexual exploitation.
Who May Certify
Any entity that meets the statutory
requirements for eligibility, which are
incorporated verbatim in the proposed
rule, may certify that it meets the
requirements of section 2257A(h). In
addition, an entity may certify for subentities that it owns or controls if the
names of the sub-entities are listed in
such certification and are crossreferenced to the matter for which the
sub-entity served as the producer.
Both United States and foreign
entities may certify. In the case of a
certification by a foreign entity, the
foreign entity, which may be unlikely to
collect and maintain information in
accordance with United States federal
and state tax and other laws, may certify
that it maintains the required
information in accordance with their
foreign equivalents. The Department
considers the statute’s broad description
of laws and other documentation that
satisfy the certification to provide
authority for this treatment of foreign
entities.
The certification must be signed by
the chief executive officer of the entity
making the certification, or in the event
an entity does not have a chief executive
officer, the senior manager responsible
for overseeing the entity’s activities.
The certification regime in the
proposed rule is similar for producers of
lascivious exhibition and producers of
simulated sexually explicit conduct but
differs in some material respects, as
described below.
Time Period for Certification
The certification must be filed every
two years. The Department could have
chosen a shorter period for certification,
a longer period, or a permanent
certification. The Department believes,
however, that two years is a reasonable
period to ensure that certifications
remain up to date without imposing
E:\FR\FM\06JNP1.SGM
06JNP1
32266
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 110 / Friday, June 6, 2008 / Proposed Rules
overly onerous burdens on regulated
entities.
In order to establish certifications on
the record as soon as possible, the
Department will require an initial
certification due 180 days after the
publication of this proposed rule as a
final rule. This schedule will provide
sufficient time for entities to determine
if they wish to certify in compliance
with the regulatory requirements. All
subsequent certifications will be due on
the same date at two-year intervals. The
initial certification and all subsequent
certifications must be filed within a
period of five business days concluding
on the due date (i.e., if the due date
were on a Friday, and there were no
federal holiday during that week, the
certification would have to be filed on
Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday,
Thursday, or Friday of that week). The
Department must have confidence that
the certification covers all depictions
subject to record-keeping requirements
for the previous period. Initial
certifications of producers who begin
production after the publication of this
proposed rule but before the expiration
of the 180-day period preceding its
publication as a final rule will be due
within a period of five business days
concluding on the last day of the 180day period. Initial certifications of
producers who begin production after
the expiration of the 180-day period, but
before the expiration of the two-year
period following the 180-day period, are
due within 60 days of the start of
production (unless the start of
production occurs within 60 days of the
expiration of the two-year period, in
which case the certifications are due on
the expiration date of the two-year
period). In any case where a due date or
last day of a time period falls on a
Saturday, Sunday, or federal holiday,
the due date or last day of a time period
is considered to run until the next day
that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or
federal holiday.
Enforcement of the Certification
All of the statements in the
certification are subject to investigation
and a false certification will violate
section 2257A and potentially other
criminal statutes.
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
Form and Content of the Certification
The certification regime in the
proposed rule requires that a producer
provide a letter to the Attorney General
that:
(1) Sets out the statutory basis under
which it and any sub-entities, if
applicable, are permitted to avail
themselves of the safe harbor;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
11:59 Jun 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
(2) Certifies that regularly and in the
normal course of business, the producer
and any sub-entities, if applicable,
collect and maintain individually
identifiable information regarding all
performers employed by the producer
who appear in visual depictions of
simulated sexually explicit conduct or
of lascivious exhibition;
(3) Lists the titles, names, or other
identifying information of visual
depictions (or matter containing them)
that include non-employee performers;
(4) Lists the titles, names, or other
identifying information of visual
depictions (or matter containing them)
produced since the last certification;
(5) Certifies that any foreign
producers of visual depictions acquired
by the certifying entity either maintain
the records required by section 2257A
or have themselves provided
certifications to the Attorney General,
and the producers making the
certifications have copies of those
records or certifications; or, for visual
depictions of simulated sexually
explicit conduct only, have taken
reasonable steps to confirm that the
performers are not minors;
(6) Lists the titles, names, or other
identifying information of the foreignproduced visual depictions (or matter
containing them) that include
performers for whom no information is
available but for whom the U.S. entity
has taken reasonable steps to confirm
that the performers are not minors;
(7) Certifies that U.S. primary
producers of visual depictions acquired
by the certifying entity either maintain
the records required by section 2257A
or certify themselves under the statute’s
safe harbor, and that the producer
making the certification has copies of
those records or certification(s). See 28
CFR 75.1(c)(1) (defining a primary
producer as ‘‘any person who actually
films, videotapes, photographs, or
creates’’ a visual depiction of sexually
explicit conduct).
Statutory Basis for the Certification
The first requirement listed above is
straightforward—the entity providing
the certification must state why it is
entitled to certify under the terms of the
statute. This will include citation to the
specific subsections of the statute under
which it is making the certification and
to basic evidence justifying that citation.
Specifically, the letter should either cite
18 U.S.C. 2257A(h)(1)(A) and 28 CFR
75.9 and state that the visual depictions
listed in the letter are ‘‘intended for
commercial distribution,’’ ‘‘created as a
part of a commercial enterprise’’ that
meets the requirements of 18 U.S.C.
2257A(h)(1)(A)(ii), and are ‘‘not
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
produced, marketed or made available
* * * in circumstances such tha[t] an
ordinary person would conclude that
* * * [they] contain a visual depiction
that is child pornography as defined in
section 2256(8)’’ or cite 18 U.S.C.
2257A(h)(1)(B) and 28 CFR 75.9 and
state that the visual depictions listed in
the letter are ‘‘subject to regulation by
the Federal Communications
Commission acting in its capacity to
enforce 18 U.S.C. 1464 regarding the
broadcast of obscene, indecent or
profane programming’’ and are ‘‘created
as a part of a commercial enterprise’’
that meets the requirements of 18 U.S.C.
2257A(h)(1)(B)(ii).
Certification of Collection and
Maintenance of Records
The second requirement is the
certification under either subsection
2257A(h)(1)(A)(ii) or (B)(ii). Under
either subsection, the certifier must
demonstrate its compliance with the
following five enumerated elements: the
entity (1) ‘‘regularly and in the normal
course of business collects and
maintains’’ (2) ‘‘individually
identifiable information’’ (3) ‘‘regarding
all performers, including minor
performers employed by [the entity]’’ (4)
‘‘pursuant to Federal and State tax,
labor, and other laws, labor agreements,
or otherwise pursuant to industry
standards’’ (5) ‘‘where such information
includes the name, address, and date of
birth of the performer.’’ The Department
will consider any entity’s procedures
that include these basic elements to be
in compliance with the certification.
To the extent that these terms are not
self-explanatory, the proposed rule
defines them as follows:
‘‘Regularly and in the normal course
of business collects and maintains’’
means any business practice(s) that
ensure that the producer confirms the
identity and age of employees who
perform in visual depictions of sexually
explicit conduct.
‘‘Individually identifiable
information’’ means that information
about the name, address, and date of
birth is capable of being retrieved for
any employee who appears in a
specified visual depiction.
‘‘All performers, including minor
performers’’ means all performers who
appear, no matter how briefly, in a
visual depiction of lascivious exhibition
or simulated sexually explicit conduct.
The term ‘‘minor’’ in the statute could
be interpreted to mean performers under
the age of 18, which is the way the term
‘‘minor’’ is used elsewhere in chapter
110. Such an interpretation in this
context, however, would be redundant,
as the purpose of the record-keeping
E:\FR\FM\06JNP1.SGM
06JNP1
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 110 / Friday, June 6, 2008 / Proposed Rules
requirements is to ensure recordkeeping for ‘‘all performers,’’ the first
term in the phrase. Hence, the
Department interprets the term to refer
to performers who appear for only a
limited period of time in the context of
the overall visual depiction. ‘‘All
performers, including minor
performers’’ does not mean all
performers in any matter that may
contain a discrete (or several discrete)
visual depictions of lascivious
exhibition or simulated sexually explicit
conduct. Rather, it means only those
performers in the discrete visual
depiction(s). That is, an entity that
produces a two-hour-long movie
containing a single visual depiction of
lascivious exhibition or simulated
sexually explicit conduct lasting five
minutes need only collect and maintain
records on the performers in that fiveminute visual depiction.
‘‘Employed by’’ means performers
who receive pay for performing in the
visual depictions or are otherwise in an
employer-employee relationship with
the producer of the visual depiction as
evidenced by oral or written
agreements. This definition is
important, because by use of the term
‘‘employed by,’’ the statute appears to
permit a producer to make the
certification even if there are performers
who appear in its visual depictions for
whom it does not regularly and in the
normal course of business collect and
maintain individually identifiable
information. It is possible, for example,
that persons with whom the producer
has no employer-employee relationship
may appear in the background of a
visual depiction or may engage in
sexually explicit conduct in the
background of a depiction of nonsexually explicit conduct. Because of
the language of the statute, a producer
in that circumstance may still certify
and remove itself from the coverage of
the entire record-keeping requirements
of the section, even without collecting
and maintaining individually
identifiable information for the nonemployee performers. The language of
the statute permits no other
construction of the certification regime.
As a result of this language, however,
there is a risk that a performer who is
a minor could appear in a depiction
produced by an entity that has made a
certification and not be detected
because the minor was not ‘‘employed
by’’ the certifying entity. In addition,
there is a risk that a producer may seek
to evade the record-keeping
requirements by certifying that he
maintains records on all employees and
then producing his visual depictions
with performers—such as his own
VerDate Aug<31>2005
11:59 Jun 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
children—whom he claims are not his
employees.
In the first case, the Department
recognizes that a producer might not
collect and maintain regularly and in
the normal course of business
individually identifiable information on
non-employees. At the same time, the
Department believes that the scenario
described above—that is, the production
of visual depictions of lascivious
exhibition or of simulated sexually
explicit conduct in which bona fide
non-employees perform—will be very
rare.
The Department is more concerned
about the possibility of evasion, as in
the second scenario described above.
For that reason, the Department has
included a slightly broader definition of
‘‘employed by’’ than simply financial
remuneration. The definition would
include anyone who, even if not for pay,
intentionally performs or is required to
perform in a visual depiction of sexually
explicit conduct intended for
commercial distribution that is
produced by someone meeting the
definition of a primary or secondary
producer. See 28 CFR 75.1(c)(2)
(generally defining a ‘‘secondary
producer’’ as ‘‘any person who
produces, assembles, manufactures,
publishes, duplicates, reproduces, or
reissues’’ a visual depiction of sexually
explicit conduct).
The Department considers it
unnecessary to define the phrase
‘‘pursuant to Federal and State tax,
labor, and other laws, labor agreements,
or otherwise pursuant to industry
standards.’’ As guidance to employers,
however, the Department will consider
any document that contains a verified
name, address, and date of birth of a
performer to satisfy this requirement.
The Department considers the phrase
‘‘where such information includes the
name, address, and date of birth of the
performer’’ to be self-explanatory.
List of the Titles, Names, or Other
Identifying Information of Visual
Depictions That Include Non-Employee
Performers
As an extra precaution against
evasion, the third requirement is a list
of all visual depictions or matter
containing visual depictions in which
non-employees have engaged in
sexually explicit conduct. This provides
the Department with notice and a record
that such visual depictions by the
producers exist and, if necessary,
enables the Department to investigate
the bona fides of the certifying entity. At
the same time, the list is not so
burdensome as to vitiate the purpose of
the certification regime in the first
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
32267
instance, namely, reducing the
burdensomeness of the record-keeping
requirements. Rather than maintaining
age verification records, copies of each
performance, etc., the certifying entities
need only provide a list of their
productions that include depictions of
lascivious exhibition or simulated
sexually explicit conduct by nonemployee performers.
List of the Titles, Names, or Other
Identifying Information of Visual
Depictions Produced Since the Last
Certification
The fourth requirement is necessary
to provide the Department with both a
notice and a record regarding which
depictions or matters are subject to the
certification. The Department
considered simply allowing entities to
make a blanket assertion that they
maintain the required records on all
employees who perform in all matter
they produce. The Department
determined, however, that depictionspecific information will enable
investigators more easily to determine
whether a visual depiction is covered by
the section 2257A certification regime.
The list submitted by a certifying entity
must include the titles, names, or other
identifying information of visual
depictions acquired by the certifying
entity from foreign or U.S. primary
producers.
Certification for Entities Acquiring
Foreign-Produced Matter
The fifth requirement is a subsidiary
certification for entities acquiring matter
subject to the record-keeping
requirements from foreign producers.
The Department understands that many
producers in the United States acquire
films and other matter that may contain
visual depictions of lascivious
exhibition or simulated sexually explicit
conduct from producers abroad. In order
to produce that matter for the U.S.
market and comply with the law, the
U.S. entity acquiring the matter must
certify either that the foreign producer
in the first instance maintained the
records required by the statute and that
the U.S. entity has copies of those
records, or that the foreign entity has
certified on its own that it (the foreign
producer) maintains foreign-equivalent
records in the normal course of
business, and that the U.S. entity has a
copy of that certification. The
Department believes it is appropriate for
the exemption to apply based on
certifications that foreign producers
maintain foreign-equivalent records
because foreign countries generally have
tax and employment laws requiring
identification of employees that are
E:\FR\FM\06JNP1.SGM
06JNP1
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
32268
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 110 / Friday, June 6, 2008 / Proposed Rules
substantially similar to requirements
under U.S. law.
There may be cases where a U.S.
entity acquires foreign-produced matter
and cannot certify the information
above. In such a case, the U.S. entity
would not be able to produce the matter
in the United States. Denying the market
in the United States access to a large
amount of foreign-produced matter,
however, could be construed as a
burden on American citizens’ First
Amendment right to free expression. At
the same time, the Department cannot
risk permitting either foreign children to
be exploited in the visual depictions
produced for the U.S. market or evasion
of the statute by unscrupulous U.S.
producers.
Therefore, U.S. entities making the
certification may certify that to the
extent that they have acquired visual
depictions or matter containing visual
depictions of simulated sexually
explicit conduct from foreign entities
and to the extent that the primary
foreign producer does not either
maintain the records required by the
statute or provide a certification to the
Attorney General itself, the entity
making the certification has made
reasonable efforts to ensure that no
performer in any such foreign visual
depiction is a minor.
The same process will not be
available for visual depictions of
lascivious exhibition acquired from
foreign entities. The risks of exploitation
of children in such visual depictions
and the risk of evasion of the recordkeeping requirements are too great to
permit the accommodation for visual
depictions of simulated sexually
explicit conduct outlined above. The
Department is concerned that providing
a method for weaker enforcement of
section 2257 with regard to lascivious
exhibition would undermine the
existing section 2257 requirements. The
Department notes, however, that
Congress clearly considered noncompliance with record-keeping
requirements concerning visual
depictions of simulated sexually
explicit conduct (under section 2257A)
to be a less serious crime than noncompliance with analogous
requirements for visual depictions of
actual sexually explicit conduct (under
section 2257), as exemplified by the
misdemeanor penalty for violation of
the former section versus the felony
penalty for violation of the latter
section.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:32 Jun 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
List of All Foreign-Acquired Matter for
Which Records of Performers Are Not
Available
The sixth requirement is that the
entity making the certification must
include a list of the visual depictions or
matter including those visual depictions
for which no records exist but for which
the certifying entity has made
reasonable efforts to ensure that no
performer in any visual depiction is a
minor. As with the case of nonemployee performers, this list will
provide the Department with notice and
a record that such visual depictions
exist and if necessary, enable
investigation of such matter. At the
same time, the requirement of the list
and a certification of reasonable efforts
by the secondary producer in the United
States will provide significant
protection without unduly infringing on
constitutional rights. The risk of evasion
is mitigated by the severe criminal
penalties for production of child
pornography that would apply to any
matter covered by the record-keeping
requirements.
Certification of Record-Keeping by
Primary Producers
The seventh requirement is that, as
with foreign primary producers, an
entity acquiring visual depictions must
certify either that the primary producer
in the first instance maintained the
records required by the statute and that
the certifying entity has copies of those
records, or that the primary producer
has certified separately that it (the
primary producer) has made a
certification and that the acquiring
entity has a copy of that certification.
Effective Dates
In accordance with current law, the
proposed rule retains July 3, 1995, as
the effective date of the rule’s
requirements for secondary producers
related to depictions of actual sexually
explicit conduct. (The current
regulations, published in 2005, adopted
July 3, 1995, as the effective date of
enforcement of section 2257 based on
the court’s order in American Library
Association v. Reno, No. 91–0394 (SS)
(D.D.C. July 28, 1995)) The proposed
rule also states that producers of visual
depictions of actual sexually explicit
conduct made after July 3, 1995, the
effective date of the regulations
published in 1992, and before June 23,
2005, the effective date of the current
regulations published in 2005, may rely
on picture identification cards issued by
private entities such as schools or
private employers that were valid forms
of required identification
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
documentation under the provisions of
part 75 in effect on the original
production date. Finally, the proposed
rule’s effective date concerning
depictions of simulated sexually
explicit conduct will be 90 days after its
publication in the Federal Register as a
final rule.
Regulatory Procedures
Regulatory Flexibility Act
In accordance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612
(‘‘RFA’’), the Department of Justice has
drafted this proposed rule to minimize
its impact on small businesses while
meeting its intended objectives. Based
upon the preliminary information
available to the Department through
past investigations and enforcement
actions involving the affected industry,
the Department is unable to state with
certainty that this rule, if promulgated
as a final rule, will not have any effect
on small businesses of the type
described in 5 U.S.C. 601(3).
Accordingly, the Department has
prepared a final RFA analysis in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 604, as
follows:
A. Need for and Objectives of This Rule
The identity of every performer is
critical to determining and assuring that
no performer is a minor. The key
congressional concern, evidenced by the
child exploitation statutory scheme, was
that all such performers of actual or
simulated sexually explicit conduct
verifiably not be minors, i.e. , not
younger than 18 years of age. See 18
U.S.C. 2256(1), 2257(b)(1), 2257A(b)(1).
Congress has recognized that minors
warrant special concern in this area.
Children themselves are incapable of
giving voluntary and knowing consent
to perform or to enter into contracts to
perform such conduct. In addition,
children often are forced to engage
involuntarily in sexually explicit
conduct. For these reasons, visual
depictions of actual and simulated
sexually explicit conduct that involve
persons under the age of 18 constitute
unlawful child pornography. See 18
U.S.C. 2256(8).
This proposed rule amends certain
provisions of the existing regulations
and adds other provisions to these
regulations to conform to the Act, as
described above.
B. Description and Estimates of the
Number of Small Entities Affected by
This Rule
The RFA defines a ‘‘small business’’
as equivalent to a ‘‘small business
concern’’ under the Small Business Act
(‘‘SBA’’). See 5 U.S.C. 601(3)
E:\FR\FM\06JNP1.SGM
06JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 110 / Friday, June 6, 2008 / Proposed Rules
(incorporating by reference the
definition of ‘‘small business concern’’
in 15 U.S.C. 632). Under the SBA, a
‘‘small-business concern’’ is one that (1)
is independently owned and operated,
(2) is not dominant in its field of
operation, and (3) meets any additional
criteria established by the SBA. See 15
U.S.C. 632(a).
Based upon the information available
to the Department, there are likely to be
a significant number of small businesses
that are producers of visual depictions
of simulated sexually explicit conduct.
Pursuant to the RFA, the Department
requests affected small businesses to
estimate what these regulations will cost
as a percentage of their total revenues in
order to enable the Department to
ensure that small businesses are not
unduly burdened.
The proposed rule has no effect on
State or local governmental agencies.
C. Specific Requirements Imposed That
Would Impact Private Companies
The proposed rule imposes
requirements on private companies with
respect to visual depictions of simulated
sexually explicit conduct to ensure that
minors are not used in such depictions.
Specifically, the rule imposes certain
name- and age-verification and recordkeeping requirements on producers of
visual depictions of simulated sexually
explicit conduct concerning the
performers portrayed in those
depictions. The proposed rule, however,
provides an exemption from these
requirements applicable in certain
circumstances.
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
Executive Order 12866
This proposed rule has been drafted
and reviewed in accordance with
Executive Order 12866, § 1(b),
Principles of Regulation. The
Department has determined that this
rule is a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866, § 3(f).
Accordingly, this rule has been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget.
The benefit of the rule is that children
will be protected from exploitation in
the production of visual depictions of
simulated sexually explicit conduct by
ensuring that only those who are at least
18 years of age perform in such
depictions. The costs to the industry
include what the Department believes to
be slightly higher record-keeping costs.
The Department encourages all affected
commercial entities to provide specific
estimates, wherever possible, of the
economic costs that this rule will
impose on them.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
11:59 Jun 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
Executive Order 13132
This regulation will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 13132,
it is determined that this rule does not
have sufficient federalism implications
to warrant the preparation of a
Federalism Assessment.
Executive Order 12988
This regulation meets the applicable
standards set forth in Executive Order
12988 § 3(a), (b)(2).
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
This rule will not result in the
expenditure by State, local and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100,000,000 or more
in any one year, and it will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. Therefore, no actions were
deemed necessary under the provisions
of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995, 2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as
defined by section 251 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996. See 5 U.S.C. 804.
This rule will not result in an annual
effect on the economy of $100,000,000
or more; a major increase in costs or
prices for consumers, individual
industries, Federal, State, or local
government agencies, or geographic
regions; or significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability
of United States-based companies to
compete with foreign-based companies
in domestic and export markets.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule expands the scope
of existing requirements to conform to
newly enacted legislation. It also
implements the newly enacted
legislation’s exemption from these
expanded requirements applicable in
certain cases. It contains a revised
collection of information that clarifies
the means of maintaining and
organizing the required documents.
The Department has submitted the
following information-collection request
to the Office of Management and Budget
(‘‘OMB’’) for review and clearance in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
32269
collection of information is published to
obtain comments from the public.
Any comments received during the
comment period should address one or
more of the following four points: (1)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(3) how to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (4) how to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g. , permitting electronic
submission of responses.
Overview of this collection of
information:
(1) Type of collection of information:
Revision of a currently approved
collection.
(2) Title: Inspection of Records
Relating to Depictions of Simulated
Sexually Explicit Performances.
(3) Agency form number, if any: None.
(4) Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract:
Primary: Business or other for-profit
entities.
Other: None.
Abstract: This rule proposes to amend
the record-keeping, labeling, and
inspection requirements of 28 CFR part
75 to account for the enactment of the
Adam Walsh Child Protection and
Safety Act of 2006.
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents, the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond, and the total public burden (in
hours) associated with the collection:
The Department is unable to estimate
with any precision the number of
entities producing visual depictions of
simulated sexually explicit conduct.
Because the issue of the number of
entities producing visual depictions of
simulated sexually explicit conduct is a
new issue that has arisen precisely
because of section 2257A, there does not
appear to be much available information
concerning the number of entities
producing such material. As a partial
indication, according to the U.S. Census
Bureau, in 2002 there were 11,163
establishments engaged in motion
picture and video production in the
United States. Based on a rough
assumption that 10% were engaged in
E:\FR\FM\06JNP1.SGM
06JNP1
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
32270
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 110 / Friday, June 6, 2008 / Proposed Rules
the production of visual depictions of
simulated sexually explicit conduct, the
Department estimates that
approximately 1116 motion picture and
video producing establishments would
be covered. (The Department does not
certify this estimate and invites
comment on the assumptions upon
which it is based.) The underlying
statute provides an exemption from
these requirements applicable in certain
circumstances, and it requires producers
to submit certifications to qualify for
this exemption. The Department has no
information concerning the number of
otherwise covered entities that would
qualify for this statutory exemption, nor
is it able to estimate this number. For
entities that qualify for the statutory
exemption, however, the Department
estimates that it would take less than 20
hours per year at an estimated cost of
less than $25.00 per hour to prepare the
biennial certification required for the
statutory exemption. The Department’s
burden hour estimate for preparing the
biennial certification required for the
statutory exemption recognizes that the
certification must take the form of a
letter indicating that the producer
regularly and in the normal course of
business collects and maintains
individually identifiable information
regarding all performers employed by
that person, and shall include a list of
the titles, names, or other identifying
information of visual depictions of
simulated sexually explicit conduct or
lascivious exhibition produced since the
last certification, as well as a list of the
titles, names, or other identifying
information of visual depictions of
simulated sexually explicit conduct or
lascivious exhibition that include nonemployee performers. The Department
assumes that the certification’s main
burden would be to require producers to
maintain a list of the visual depictions
produced during the certification
period, and that the majority of the work
to prepare the certification would be
performed by administrative staff. Based
on the Department’s assumption that
90% of such entities would qualify for
the exemption, the total annual cost for
the entities qualifying for the statutory
exemption would be approximately
$21,500 per year. Again, the Department
does not certify the accuracy of these
numbers and invites comment on the
assumptions outlined above.
Based on the Department’s
assumption that 3,000,000 visual
depictions of simulated sexually
explicit conduct are created each year
and that it requires 6 minutes to
complete the record-keeping
requirement for each depiction, the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
11:59 Jun 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
record-keeping requirements would
impose a burden of 300,000 hours.
Based on the Department’s assumption
that producers of 90% of these
depictions would qualify for the
statutory exemption from these
requirements, the requirements would
only impose a burden of 30,000 hours.
Assuming further that the record
keeping requirements will cost $6.00
per hour to complete and $0.05 for each
image of a verifiable form of
identification, the total annual cost for
the 10% of entities not qualifying for the
statutory exemption would be $181,500.
Again, the Department does not certify
the accuracy of these numbers and
invites comment on the assumptions
outlined above.
The Department notes that steps taken
to minimize the burden of these
requirements on small entities include
the statutory exemption requiring only
that such entities prepare the
certification necessary for the
exemption.
All comments and suggestions, or
questions regarding additional
information, should be directed to
Andrew Oosterbaan, Chief, Child
Exploitation and Obscenity Section,
Criminal Division, United States
Department of Justice, Washington, DC
20530; (202) 514–5780. This is not a
toll-free number. Comments should also
be sent to: Lynn Bryant, Clearance
Officer, United States Department of
Justice, Policy and Planning Staff,
Justice Management Division, Patrick
Henry Building, 601 D Street, NW,
Washington, DC 20530.
List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 75
Crime, Infants and children,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth
in the preamble, part 75 of chapter I of
title 28 of the Code of Federal
Regulations is proposed to be amended
as follows:
PART 75—CHILD PROTECTION
RESTORATION AND PENALTIES
ENHANCEMENT ACT OF 1990;
PROTECT ACT; ADAM WALSH CHILD
PROTECTION AND SAFETY ACT OF
2006; RECORD-KEEPING AND
RECORD INSPECTION PROVISIONS
1. The authority citation for part 75 is
revised to read as follows:
Authority: 18 U.S.C. 2257, 2257A.
2. The title of part 75 is revised to
read as set forth above.
3. Amend § 75.1 by revising
paragraphs (c)(1), (c)(2), (c)(4)
introductory text, and (d), and further
amend as proposed on July 12, 2007, at
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
72 FR 38038 by revising paragraph (m)
and adding paragraphs (o), (p), (q), (r),
and (s), to read as follows:
§ 75.1
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) Primary producer is any person
who actually films, videotapes,
photographs, or creates a digitally or
computer-manipulated image, a digital
image, or picture, or digitizes an image,
of a visual depiction of an actual human
being engaged in actual or simulated
sexually explicit conduct.
(2) Secondary producer is any person
who produces, assembles,
manufactures, publishes, duplicates,
reproduces, or reissues a book,
magazine, periodical, film, videotape,
digitally or computer-manipulated
image, picture, or other matter intended
for commercial distribution that
contains a visual depiction of an actual
human being engaged in actual or
simulated sexually explicit conduct, or
who inserts on a computer site or
service a digital image of, or otherwise
manages the sexually explicit content of
a computer site or service that contains
a visual depiction of an actual human
being engaged in actual or simulated
sexually explicit conduct, including any
person who enters into a contract,
agreement, or conspiracy to do any of
the foregoing.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) Producer does not include persons
whose activities relating to the visual
depiction of actual or simulated
sexually explicit conduct are limited to
the following:
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Sell, distribute, redistribute, and
re-release refer to commercial
distribution of a book, magazine,
periodical, film, videotape, digitally or
computer-manipulated image, digital
image, picture, or other matter that
contains a visual depiction of an actual
human being engaged in actual or
simulated sexually explicit conduct, but
does not refer to noncommercial or
educational distribution of such matter,
including transfers conducted by bona
fide lending libraries, museums,
schools, or educational organizations.
*
*
*
*
*
(m) Date of original production or
original production date means the date
the primary producer actually filmed,
videotaped, or photographed, or created
a digitally or computer-manipulated
image, digital image, or picture, of the
visual depiction of an actual human
being engaged in actual or simulated
sexually explicit conduct.
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\06JNP1.SGM
06JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 110 / Friday, June 6, 2008 / Proposed Rules
(o) Simulated sexually explicit
conduct means conduct engaged in by
performers in a visual depiction that is
intended to appear to be actual sexually
explicit conduct and does so appear to
a reasonable viewer.
(p) Regularly and in the normal
course of business collects and
maintains means any business practice
that ensures that the producer confirms
the identity and age of employees who
perform in visual depictions of sexually
explicit conduct.
(q) Individually identifiable
information means that information
about the names, addresses, and dates of
birth of employees is capable of being
retrieved on the basis of a name of an
employee who appears in a specified
visual depiction.
(r) All performers, including minor
performers means all performers who
appear in a visual depiction of
lascivious exhibition of the genitals or
pubic area or simulated sexually
explicit conduct, no matter for how
short a period of time.
(s) Employed by means, in reference
to a performer, one who receives pay for
performing in a visual depiction or is
otherwise in an employer-employee
relationship with the producer of the
visual depiction as evidenced by oral or
written agreements.
4. Amend § 75.2 by revising the
introductory text of paragraph (a) and
paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2), (c) and (d), to
read as follows:
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
§ 75.2
Maintenance of records.
(a) Any producer of any book,
magazine, periodical, film, videotape,
digitally or computer-manipulated
image, digital image, picture, or other
matter that contains a depiction of an
actual human being engaged in actual
sexually explicit conduct that is
produced in whole or in part with
materials that have been mailed or
shipped in interstate or foreign
commerce, or is shipped or transported
or is intended for shipment or
transportation in interstate or foreign
commerce and that contains one or
more visual depictions of an actual
human being engaged in actual sexually
explicit conduct made after July 3, 1995,
or of an actual human being engaged in
simulated sexually explicit conduct
made after [DATE 90 DAYS AFTER
PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL
REGISTER OF THE FINAL RULE],
shall, for each performer portrayed in
such visual depiction, create and
maintain records containing the
following:
(1) The legal name and date of birth
of each performer, obtained by the
producer’s examination of a picture
VerDate Aug<31>2005
11:59 Jun 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
identification card prior to production
of the depiction. For any performer
portrayed in a depiction of an actual
human being engaged in actual sexually
explicit conduct made after July 3, 1995,
or of an actual human being engaged in
simulated sexually explicit conduct
made after [DATE 90 DAYS AFTER
PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL
REGISTER OF THE FINAL RULE], the
records shall also include a legible hard
copy of the identification document
examined and, if that document does
not contain a recent and recognizable
picture of the performer, a legible hard
copy of a picture identification card. For
any performer portrayed in a depiction
of an actual human being engaged in
actual sexually explicit conduct made
after June 23, 2005, or of an actual
human being engaged in simulated
sexually explicit conduct made after
[DATE 90 DAYS AFTER PUBLICATION
IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER OF THE
FINAL RULE], the records shall include
a copy of the depiction and, where the
depiction is published on an Internet
computer site or service, a copy of any
URL associated with the depiction. If no
URL is associated with the depiction,
the records shall include another
uniquely identifying reference
associated with the location of the
depiction on the Internet. For any
performer in a depiction performed live
on the Internet, the records shall
include a copy of the depiction with
running-time sufficient to identify the
performer in the depiction and to
associate the performer with the records
needed to confirm his or her age.
(2) Any name, other than the
performer’s legal name, ever used by the
performer, including the performer’s
maiden name, alias, nickname, stage
name, or professional name. For any
performer portrayed in a visual
depiction of an actual human being
engaged in actual sexually explicit
conduct made after July 3, 1995, or of
an actual human being engaged in
simulated sexually explicit conduct
made after [DATE 90 DAYS AFTER
PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL
REGISTER OF THE FINAL RULE], such
names shall be indexed by the title or
identifying number of the book,
magazine, film, videotape, digitally or
computer-manipulated image, digital
image, picture, URL, or other matter.
Producers may rely in good faith on
representations by performers regarding
accuracy of the names, other than legal
names, used by performers.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) The information contained in the
records required to be created and
maintained by this part need be current
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
32271
only as of the time the primary producer
actually films, videotapes, or
photographs, or creates a digitally or
computer-manipulated image, digital
image, or picture, of the visual depiction
of an actual human being engaged in
actual or simulated sexually explicit
conduct. If the producer subsequently
produces an additional book, magazine,
film, videotape, digitally or computermanipulated image, digital image, or
picture, or other matter (including but
not limited to an Internet computer site
or service) that contains one or more
visual depictions of an actual human
being engaged in actual or simulated
sexually explicit conduct made by a
performer for whom he maintains
records as required by this part, the
producer may add the additional title or
identifying number and the names of
the performer to the existing records
maintained pursuant to paragraph (a)(2)
of this section.
(d) For any record of a performer in
a visual depiction of actual sexually
explicit conduct created or amended
after June 23, 2005, or of a performer in
a visual depiction of simulated sexually
explicit conduct made after [DATE 90
DAYS AFTER PUBLICATION IN THE
FEDERAL REGISTER OF THE FINAL
RULE], all such records shall be
organized alphabetically, or numerically
where appropriate, by the legal name of
the performer (by last or family name,
then first or given name), and shall be
indexed or cross-referenced to each alias
or other name used and to each title or
identifying number of the book,
magazine, film, videotape, digitally or
computer-manipulated image, digital
image, or picture, or other matter
(including but not limited to an Internet
computer site or service). If the
producer subsequently produces an
additional book, magazine, film,
videotape, digitally or computermanipulated image, digital image,
picture, or other matter (including but
not limited to an Internet computer site
or service) that contains one or more
visual depictions of an actual human
being engaged in actual or simulated
sexually explicit conduct made by a
performer for whom he maintains
records as required by this part, the
producer shall add the additional title
or identifying number and the name(s)
of the performer to the existing records
and such records shall thereafter be
maintained in accordance with this
paragraph.
*
*
*
*
*
5. Amend § 75.6 by revising paragraph
(a) to read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\06JNP1.SGM
06JNP1
32272
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 110 / Friday, June 6, 2008 / Proposed Rules
§ 75.6 Statement describing location of
books and records.
(a) Any producer of any book,
magazine, periodical, film, videotape,
digitally or computer-manipulated
image, digital image, picture, or other
matter (including but not limited to an
Internet computer site or service) that
contains one or more visual depictions
of an actual human being engaged in
actual sexually explicit conduct made
after July 3, 1995, and produced,
manufactured, published, duplicated,
reproduced, or reissued after July 3,
1995, or in simulated sexually explicit
conduct made after [DATE 90 DAYS
AFTER PUBLICATION IN THE
FEDERAL REGISTER OF THE FINAL
RULE], shall cause to be affixed to every
copy of the matter a statement
describing the location of the records
required by this part. A producer may
cause such statement to be affixed, for
example, by instructing the
manufacturer of the book, magazine,
periodical, film, videotape, digitally or
computer-manipulated image, digital
image, picture, or other matter to affix
the statement. In this paragraph, the
term ‘‘copy’’ includes every page of a
Web site on which appears a visual
depiction of an actual human being
engaged in actual or simulated sexually
explicit conduct.
*
*
*
*
*
6. Revise § 75.7 to read as follows:
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
§ 75.7
Exemption statement.
(a) Any producer of any book,
magazine, periodical, film, videotape,
digitally or computer-manipulated
image, digital image, picture, or other
matter may cause to be affixed to every
copy of the matter a statement attesting
that the matter is not covered by the
record-keeping requirements of 18
U.S.C. 2257(a)–(c) or 18 U.S.C.
2257A(a)–(c), as applicable, and of this
part if:
(1) The matter contains only visual
depictions of actual sexually explicit
conduct made before July 3, 1995, or
was produced, manufactured,
published, duplicated, reproduced, or
reissued before July 3, 1995;
(2) The matter contains only visual
depictions of simulated sexually
explicit conduct made before [DATE 90
DAYS AFTER PUBLICATION IN THE
FEDERAL REGISTER OF THE FINAL
RULE];
(3) The matter contains only some
combination of the visual depictions
described in paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2)
of this section.
(b) If the primary producer and the
secondary producer are different
entities, the primary producer may
certify to the secondary producer that
VerDate Aug<31>2005
11:59 Jun 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
the visual depictions in the matter
satisfy the standards under paragraphs
(a)(1) through (a)(3) of this section. The
secondary producer then may cause to
be affixed to every copy of the matter a
statement attesting that the matter is not
covered by the record-keeping
requirements of 18 U.S.C. 2257(a)–(c) or
18 U.S.C. 2257A(a)–(c), as applicable,
and of this part.
7. Amend § 75.8 by revising paragraph
(d) to read as follows:
§ 75.8
Location of the statement.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) A computer site or service or Web
address containing a digitally or
computer-manipulated image, digital
image, or picture, shall contain the
required statement on every page of a
Web site on which appears a visual
depiction of an actual human being
engaged in actual or simulated sexually
explicit conduct.
*
*
*
*
*
8. Amend part 75 by adding § 75.9 to
read as follows:
§ 75.9
Certification of records.
(a) In general. The provisions of
§§ 75.2 through 75.8 shall not apply to
a visual depiction of actual sexually
explicit conduct constituting lascivious
exhibition of the genitals or pubic area
of a person or to a visual depiction of
simulated sexually explicit conduct if
all of the following requirements are
met:
(1) The visual depiction is intended
for commercial distribution;
(2) The visual depiction is created as
a part of a commercial enterprise;
(3) Either—
(i) The visual depiction is not
produced, marketed, or made available
in circumstances such that an ordinary
person would conclude that the matter
contains a visual depiction that is child
pornography as defined in 18 U.S.C.
2256(8), or
(ii) The visual depiction is subject to
regulation by the Federal
Communications Commission acting in
its capacity to enforce 18 U.S.C. 1464
regarding the broadcast of obscene,
indecent, or profane programming; and
(4) The producer of the visual
depiction certifies to the Attorney
General that he regularly and in the
normal course of business collects and
maintains individually identifiable
information regarding all performers,
including minor performers, whom he
employs pursuant to Federal and State
tax, labor, and other laws, labor
agreements, or otherwise pursuant to
industry standards, where such
information includes the names,
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
addresses, and dates of birth of the
performers.
(b) Form of certification. The
certification shall take the form of a
letter addressed to the Attorney General
and signed by the chief executive officer
of the entity making the certification or,
in the event the entity does not have a
chief executive officer, the senior
manager responsible for overseeing the
entity’s activities.
(c) Content of certification. The
certification shall contain the following:
(1) A statement setting out the basis
under 18 U.S.C. 2257A and part 75.9
under which the certifying entity and
any sub-entities, if applicable, are
permitted to avail themselves of the safe
harbor, and basic evidence justifying
that basis.
(2) The following statement: ‘‘I hereby
certify that [name of entity] [and all subentities listed in this letter] regularly
and in the normal course of business
collect and maintain individually
identifiable information regarding all
performers employed by [name of
entity] who appear in visual depictions
of simulated sexually explicit conduct
or of lascivious exhibition of the
genitals or pubic area’’;
(3) A list of the titles, names, or other
identifying information of visual
depictions of simulated sexually
explicit conduct or lascivious exhibition
of the genitals or pubic area (or matter
containing them) that include nonemployee performers;
(4) A list of the titles, names, or other
identifying information of visual
depictions of simulated sexually
explicit conduct or lascivious exhibition
of the genitals or pubic area (or matter
containing them) produced since the
last certification;
(5) If applicable because the visual
depictions at issue were produced
outside the United States, the statement
that: ‘‘I hereby certify that the foreign
producers of the visual depictions listed
above either collect and maintain the
records required by sections 2257 and
2257A of title 18 of the U.S. Code, or
have certified to the Attorney General
that they collect and maintain
individually identifiable information
regarding all performers, including
minor performers, whom they employ
pursuant to tax, labor, and other laws,
labor agreements, or otherwise pursuant
to industry standards, where such
information includes the names,
addresses, and dates of birth of the
performers, in accordance with 28 CFR
part 75; and [name of entity] has copies
of those records or certifications.’’ For
visual depictions of simulated sexually
explicit conduct only, the producer may
provide the following statement instead:
E:\FR\FM\06JNP1.SGM
06JNP1
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 110 / Friday, June 6, 2008 / Proposed Rules
‘‘I hereby certify that [name of entity]
has taken reasonable steps to confirm
that the performers in the visual
depictions listed below are not minors.’’
(6) If applicable, a list of the titles,
names, or other identifying information
of the foreign-produced visual
depictions (or matter containing them)
of simulated sexually explicit conduct
for whom records of the performers
appearing in them are not available but
for whom the certifying entity has taken
reasonable steps to confirm that the
performers in them are not minors.
(7) If applicable, the statement that: ‘‘I
hereby certify that the primary
producers of visual depictions
secondarily produced by [name of
entity] and listed above either collect
and maintain the records required by
sections 2257 and 2257A of title 18 of
the U.S. Code or have certified to the
Attorney General that they regularly and
in the normal course of business collect
and maintain individually identifiable
information regarding all performers,
including minor performers, whom they
employ, pursuant to Federal and State
tax, labor, and other laws, labor
agreements, or otherwise pursuant to
industry standards, where such
information includes the names,
addresses, and dates of birth of the
performers, in accordance with 28 CFR
part 75; and [name of entity] has copies
of those records or certifications.’’
(d) Entities covered by each
certification. A single certification may
cover all or some subset of all entities
owned by the entity making the
certification. However, the names of the
sub-entities covered must be listed in
such certification and must be crossreferenced to the matter for which the
sub-entities served as the producers.
(e) Frequency of certification. An
initial certification is due [DATE 180
DAYS AFTER PUBLICATION IN THE
FEDERAL REGISTER OF THE FINAL
RULE]. Subsequent certifications are
due every two years from that date. The
initial certification and all subsequent
certifications must be filed within a
period of five business days concluding
on the due date (i.e. , if the due date
were on a Friday, and there were no
federal holiday during that week, the
certification would have to be filed on
Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday,
Thursday, or Friday of that week).
Initial certifications of producers who
begin production after [DATE OF
PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL
REGISTER OF THE FINAL RULE] but
before [DATE 180 DAYS AFTER
PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL
REGISTER OF THE FINAL RULE] are
due on [DATE 180 DAYS AFTER
PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:16 Jun 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
REGISTER OF THE FINAL RULE] and
must be filed within a period of five
business days concluding on the due
date. Initial certifications of producers
who begin production after [DATE 180
DAYS AFTER PUBLICATION IN THE
FEDERAL REGISTER OF THE FINAL
RULE] but before [DATE TWO YEARS
AFTER 180 DAYS AFTER
PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL
REGISTER OF THE FINAL RULE] are
due within 60 days of the start of
production (unless the start of
production occurs within 60 days of
[DATE TWO YEARS AFTER 180 DAYS
AFTER PUBLICATION IN THE
FEDERAL REGISTER OF THE FINAL
RULE], in which case the certifications
are due on [DATE TWO YEARS AFTER
180 DAYS AFTER PUBLICATION IN
THE FEDERAL REGISTER OF THE
FINAL RULE]) and must be filed within
a period of five business days
concluding on the due date. In any case
where a due date or last day of a time
period falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or
federal holiday, the due date or last day
of a time period is considered to run
until the next day that is not a Saturday,
Sunday, or Federal holiday.
Dated: May 30, 2008.
Michael B. Mukasey,
Attorney General.
[FR Doc. E8–12635 Filed 6–5–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–14–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 151
[USCG–2004–19621]
RIN 1625–AA89
Dry Cargo Residue Discharges in the
Great Lakes; Notice of Public Meeting
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of public meetings.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard announces
that public meetings for the May 23,
2008 notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) on dry cargo residue discharges
in the Great Lakes and its supporting
Draft Environmental Impact Statement
(DEIS) will be held in Duluth,
Minnesota, and Cleveland, Ohio, in July
2008. The proposed rule would allow
the continued discharge of certain nontoxic and non-hazardous bulk dry cargo
residues in the Great Lakes. Existing
prohibitions on discharges in certain
areas would be continued, and
additional sensitive and protected areas
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
32273
would be defined as no-discharge zones.
Recordkeeping and reporting
requirements would be imposed, and
the voluntary use of measures to control
residues would be encouraged.
DATES: The public meetings will be held
on the following dates:
• Duluth, MN, July 15, 2008 from 1
p.m. to 5 p.m.
• Cleveland, OH, July 17, 2008 from
1 p.m. to 5 p.m.
The previously announced deadline
for receiving public comments on the
Coast Guard’s notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) and DEIS is July 22,
2008.
ADDRESSES: The Coast Guard will hold
the public meetings at the following
addresses:
• Duluth: Holiday Inn, 200 West First
Street, Duluth, MN 55802, phone 218–
727–7492.
• Cleveland: The Forum Conference
Center, One Cleveland Center, 1375 East
Ninth Street, Cleveland, OH 44114,
phone 216–241–6338.
You may also submit comments
identified by Coast Guard docket
number USCG–2004–19621 to the
Docket Management Facility at the U.S.
Department of Transportation. To avoid
duplication, please use only one of the
following methods:
(1) Online: https://
www.regulations.gov.
(2) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(3) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(4) Hand delivery: Room W12–140 on
the Ground Floor of the West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202–366–9329.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this notice,
contact LT Heather St. Pierre, Project
Manager, Environmental Standards
Division, Coast Guard, via telephone at
202–372–1432 or via e-mail at
Heather.J.St.Pierre@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–493–0402.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comment Submissions
In the NPRM published May 23, 2008
(73 FR 30014), we previously requested
public comments and provided
information on how to submit them in
writing. All written comments received
E:\FR\FM\06JNP1.SGM
06JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 110 (Friday, June 6, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 32262-32273]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-12635]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
28 CFR Part 75
[Docket No. CRM 105; AG Order No. 2966-2008]
RIN 1105-AB19
Inspection of Records Relating to Depiction of Simulated Sexually
Explicit Performances
AGENCY: Department of Justice.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule proposes to amend record-keeping, labeling, and
inspection requirements to implement provisions of the Adam Walsh Child
Protection and Safety Act of 2006 that require producers of depictions
of simulated sexually explicit conduct to maintain records documenting
that performers in those depictions are at least 18 years of age. The
rule also implements provisions of the Adam Walsh Act that create a
certification regime for the exemption of producers, in certain
circumstances, from those requirements and from similar requirements
for producers of visual depictions of the lascivious exhibition of the
genitals or pubic area of a person.
DATES: Written comments must be received by August 5, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted to: Andrew Oosterbaan,
Chief, Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, Criminal Division,
United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20530; Attn:
``Docket No. CRM 105.''
Comments may be submitted electronically to www.regulations.gov by
using the electronic comment form provided on that site. Comments
submitted electronically must include ``Docket No. CRM 105'' in the
subject box. You may also view an electronic version of this rule at
the www.regulations.gov site.
Facsimile comments may be submitted to: (202) 514-1793. This is not
a toll-free number. Comments submitted by facsimile must include
``Docket No. CRM 105'' on the cover sheet.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Oosterbaan, Chief, Child
Exploitation and Obscenity Section, Criminal Division, United States
Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20530; (202) 514-5780. This is
not a toll-free number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Comments
Please note that because the Department of Justice is now fully
operational using the www.regulations.gov site, the Child Exploitation
and Obscenity Section, Criminal Division has deactivated the e-mail
address for electronic comments that it published in rulemakings before
the Department started using www.regulations.gov. In order to ensure
that electronic comments are received by the Department, commenters
submitting electronic comments must use the electronic comment form
provided on the www.regulations.gov site.
Please also note that all comments received are considered part of
the public record and made available for public inspection online at
www.regulations.gov. Such information includes personal identifying
information (such as your name, address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by
the commenter.
If you want to submit personal identifying information (such as
your name, address, etc.) as part of your comment, but do not want it
to be posted online, you must include the phrase ``PERSONAL IDENTIFYING
INFORMATION'' in the first paragraph of your comment. You also must
locate all the personal identifying information you do not want posted
online in the first paragraph of your comment and identify in that
paragraph what information you want redacted.
If you want to submit confidential business information as part of
your comment but do not want it to be posted online, you must include
the phrase ``CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION'' in the first paragraph
of your comment. You also must identify prominently any confidential
business information to be redacted within the comment. If a comment
has so much confidential business information that it cannot be
effectively redacted, all or part of that comment might not be posted
on www.regulations.gov.
Personal identifying information identified and located as set
forth above will be placed in the agency's public docket file, but not
posted online. Confidential business information identified and located
as set forth above will not be placed in the public docket file. If you
wish to inspect the agency's public docket file in person by
appointment, please see the ``For Additional Information'' paragraph.
Discussion
On July 27, 2006, President George W. Bush signed into law the Adam
Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006, Public Law 109-248
(``the Act''). As described in more detail below, section
[[Page 32263]]
503(a) of the Act provides that producers of visual depictions of
simulated sexually explicit conduct ``shall create and maintain
individually identifiable records pertaining to every performer
portrayed in such a visual depiction.'' 18 U.S.C. 2257A(a).
The Act requires producers of visual depictions of simulated
sexually explicit conduct to:
(1) Ascertain, by examination of an identification document
containing such information, the performer's name and date of birth,
and require the performer to provide such other indicia of his or
her identity as may be prescribed by regulations;
(2) Ascertain any name, other than the performer's present and
correct name, ever used by the performer including maiden name,
alias, nickname, stage, or professional name; and
(3) Record * * * the information required by paragraphs (1) and
(2) of this subsection and such other identifying information as may
be prescribed by regulation.
Id. 2257A(b).
Furthermore, the Act requires that producers of material covered by
the statute ``shall maintain the records * * * at their business
premises, or at such other place as the Attorney General may by
regulation prescribe and shall make such records available to the
Attorney General for inspection at all reasonable times.'' Id.
2257A(c). Producers also must ``cause to be affixed to'' matter
containing the visual depictions covered by section 2257A ``a statement
describing where the records required by this section with respect to
all performers depicted in that copy of the matter may be located,''
Id. 2257A(e)(1), and the Act makes it illegal, inter alia, ``for any
person knowingly to sell or otherwise transfer, or offer for sale or
transfer'' any such matter ``which does not have affixed thereto * * *
a statement describing where the records required by this section may
be located,'' id. 2257A(f)(4).
Violation of these requirements is a misdemeanor, subject to
imprisonment for not more than one year, a criminal fine, or both. See
id. 2257A(i)(1).
The Act also created an exemption from the record-keeping
requirements of section 2257A. One part of this exemption states that
section 2257A does not apply to matter that (1) is intended for
commercial distribution, (2) is created as a part of a commercial
enterprise by a person who certifies to the Attorney General that he
regularly and in the normal course of business collects and maintains
individually identifiable name and age information regarding all
performers for purposes such as Federal and State tax, labor, and other
laws, and (3) is not produced, marketed, or otherwise made available in
circumstances such that an ordinary person would conclude that it is
child pornography. See id. 2257A(h)(1)(A). The other part of this
exemption states that section 2257A does not apply to matter that (1)
is produced by someone subject to the authority and regulation of the
Federal Communications Commission enforcing federal bans on the
broadcast of obscene, indecent, or profane programming, and (2) is
created as a part of a commercial enterprise by a person who certifies
to the Attorney General that he regularly and in the normal course of
business collects and maintains individually identifiable name and age
information regarding all performers, for purposes such as federal and
state tax, labor, and other laws. See id. 2257A(h)(1)(B).
The Act also permits such a certification for producers of visual
depictions of the lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area
of a person (hereinafter ``lascivious exhibition'') for which record-
keeping, inspection, and labeling requirements apply under 18 U.S.C.
2257. See id. 2257A(h)(1)(A), (B). Section 2257 requires that producers
of depictions of actual sexually explicit conduct maintain identity and
age records for performers in those depictions, and the Act amended
section 2257, inter alia, to cover lascivious exhibition. See id.
2257(h)(1) (as amended by section 502(a)(4) of the Act).
Background
In enacting section 2257 in 1988, Congress imposed record-keeping
requirements related to visual depictions of actual sexually explicit
conduct. Section 2257 has been critical to protecting children from
exploitation as performers in visual depictions of sexually explicit
conduct. Children are incapable of giving voluntary and knowing consent
to perform in such depictions. The consequences to children depicted in
them are devastating and can follow them for years or even their entire
lives. Furthermore, viewers of such depictions themselves may sexually
abuse children, and pedophiles use such depictions to feed their
predilections and to groom potential victims. Performers in such
depictions therefore must not be minors.
In the Act, Congress filled two gaps left by the original statute
by amending section 2257 to cover lascivious exhibition and by enacting
section 2257A to cover simulated sexually explicit conduct, while at
the same time creating an exemption from these new record-keeping
requirements in certain circumstances. (The language of section 2257A
is based largely on the language in section 2257, but only the former
contains the exemption and certification regime described above.) The
record-keeping, inspection, and labeling requirements in sections 2257
and 2257A are designed to ensure that no minor will be exploited
through depictions of actual or simulated sexually explicit conduct,
whether produced deliberately or negligently.
Chapter 110 of title 18 (``Sexual Exploitation and Other Abuse of
Children'') covers both actual and simulated sexually explicit conduct.
Specifically, it defines ``sexually explicit conduct'' as:
(A) * * * actual or simulated--(i) sexual intercourse, including
genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether
between persons of the same or opposite sex; (ii) bestiality; (iii)
masturbation; (iv) sadistic or masochistic abuse; or (v) lascivious
exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person; (B) For
purposes of subsection 8(B) of this section [part of the definition
of ``child pornography''], ``sexually explicit conduct'' means--(i)
graphic sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital,
anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or
opposite sex, or lascivious simulated sexual intercourse where the
genitals, breast, or pubic area of any person is exhibited; (ii)
graphic or lascivious simulated; (I) bestiality; (II) masturbation;
or (III) sadistic or masochistic abuse; or (iii) graphic or
simulated lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any
person.
18 U.S.C. 2256(2) (emphases added).
The terms ``simulated'' and ``actual'' also appear together in
numerous States' child-exploitation statutes. See Alaska Stat. Sec.
11.41.455; Ariz. Rev. Stat. Sec. 13-3551; Ariz. Rev. Stat. Sec. 13-
3553; Ark. Code Ann. Sec. 5-27-302; Cal. Penal Code Sec. 311.11;
Colo. Rev. Stat. Sec. 18-6-403; Conn. Gen. Stat. Sec. 53a-193; Fla.
Stat. Sec. 827.071; Ga. Code Ann. Sec. 16-12-100; Idaho Code Ann.
Sec. 18-1507; 720 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/11-20.1; Kan. Stat. Ann.
Sec. 21-3516; Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. Sec. 531.300; La. Rev. Stat. Ann.
Sec. 14:81.1; Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 272 Sec. 29C; Mich. Comp. Laws
Serv. Sec. 750.145c; Minn. Stat. Sec. 617.246; Miss. Code Ann. Sec.
97-5-33; Mo. Rev. Stat. Sec. 573.010; Mont. Code Ann. Sec. 45-5-625;
Nev. Rev. Stat. Sec. 200.725; N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. Sec. 649-A:2; N.M.
Stat. Ann. Sec. 30-6A-3; N.Y. Penal L. Sec. 263.00; N.D. Cent. Code
Sec. 12.1-27.2-01; Okla. Stat. tit. 21 Sec. 1024.1; Or. Rev. Stat.
Sec. 163.665; R.I. Gen. Laws Sec. 11-9-1.3; S.D. Codified Laws Sec.
22-24A-2; S.D. Codified Laws Sec. 22-24A-3; Tenn. Code Ann. Sec. 39-
17-1003; Tex. Penal Code Ann. Sec. 43.25; Utah Code Ann. Sec. 76-5a-
2; Utah Code Ann. Sec. 76-5a-3; Va. Code Ann. Sec. 18.2-
[[Page 32264]]
390; Wash. Rev. Code Sec. 9.68A.011; W. Va. Code Sec. 61-8C-1; Wis.
Stat. Sec. 948.01; Wyo. Stat. Ann. Sec. 6-4-303. Accordingly,
``simulated'' in the context of sexually explicit conduct is neither a
novel nor an uncommon term.
These statutes recognize that a child may be harmed both physically
and psychologically in the production of visual depictions of simulated
sexually explicit conduct, even if no sexually explicit conduct
actually takes place. Furthermore, producers of visual depictions of
actual sexually explicit conduct often substitute a visual depiction of
simulated sexually explicit conduct (so-called ``soft-core''
pornography) in place of the actual sexually explicit conduct; then the
soft-core pornography is often distributed more widely than the
unedited version of the same production. In such cases, the protection
of children from exploitation in the production of a visual depiction
of actual sexually explicit conduct necessitates that producers of
visual depictions of simulated sexually explicit conduct also be
required to maintain records and label their products.
The Proposed Rule
Section 2257's requirements are implemented in 28 CFR part 75. On
July 12, 2007, the Department of Justice (``the Department'') published
a proposed rule amending part 75 to implement those provisions of the
Act that amended section 2257. See Revised Regulations for Records
Relating to Visual Depictions of Sexually Explicit Conduct [CRM Docket
No. 104; RIN 1105-AB18], 72 FR 38033 (Jul. 12, 2007).
This proposed rule would make additional amendments to part 75 to
implement section 2257A. As explained above, sections 2257 and 2257A
operate in tandem to protect children from exploitation in visual
depictions of sexually explicit conduct. Part 75 has undergone
significant public comment and several courts have found it to be a
constitutional exercise of governmental authority. See Am. Library
Ass'n v. Reno, 33 F.3d 78 (DC Cir. 1994); Free Speech Coalition v.
Gonzales, 406 F. Supp. 2d 1196 (D. Colo. 2005) (``Free Speech I'');
Free Speech Coalition v. Gonzales, 483 F. Supp. 2d 1069 (D. Colo. 2007)
(``Free Speech II''); Connection Distrib. Co. v. Gonzales, 2006 WL
1305089, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29506 (N.D. Ohio, May 10, 2006).
Although one court invalidated part 75 as ultra vires to the extent it
regulated those whose activity ``does not involve hiring, contracting
for managing, or otherwise arranging for the participation of the
performers depicted,'' see Sundance Assoc., Inc. v. Reno, 139 F.3d 804,
806 (10th Cir. 1998) (quoting 18 U.S.C. 2257(h)(3) (1998)), Congress
subsequently amended the statute (see section 502(a)(4) of the Act) and
adopted the Attorney General's interpretation of section 2257. Cf. Free
Speech Coalition II, 483 F. Supp. 2d at 1076 (suggesting the enactment
of section 502 of the Act moots the plaintiff's ultra vires challenge
to part 75).
Because part 75 has been tested and upheld in the courts, and given
the similarities between sections 2257 and 2257A, the Department has
chosen to apply the existing requirements for visual depictions of
actual sexually explicit conduct (under section 2257) to visual
depictions of simulated sexually explicit conduct (under section 2257A)
with regard to the records at issue, the time, place and manner of
inspection of those records, and the labeling of matter containing such
visual depictions. The proposed rule therefore proposes to change
references in the Department's part 75 regulations (as proposed in CRM
Docket No. 104; RIN 1105-AB18) from ``actual sexually explicit
conduct'' to ``actual or simulated sexually explicit conduct,'' where
appropriate, and to make other minor textual changes as necessary to
regulate simulated sexually explicit conduct.
This proposed rule also makes two additional changes to part 75 to
implement section 2257A: it defines ``simulated sexually explicit
conduct'' and it implements a certification regime for producers of
actual sexually explicit conduct constituting lascivious exhibition and
for producers of simulated sexually explicit conduct.
Definition of ``simulated sexually explicit conduct''
As noted above, ``sexually explicit conduct'' is defined in section
2256(2)(A) with reference to certain physical acts and with reference
to both ``actual'' and ``simulated'' performance of those acts. No
definition of ``actual'' or ``simulated'' is contained in section 2256
or anywhere else in chapter 110. When first published in 1990, amended
in 2005, and proposed to be amended in 2007, part 75 did not adopt a
definition of ``actual,'' because the Department believed that in the
context of the acts described, the meaning of the term was sufficiently
precise for regulatory purposes. Public comments on the previous
versions of part 75 did not address the definition of ``actual,'' nor
has the meaning of that term arisen in litigation regarding the
regulations.
With the extension of part 75 to cover simulated conduct, however,
and with the statutory provision for a certification regime for
simulated conduct, the Department believes that a definition of the
term ``simulated sexually explicit conduct'' is necessary. A definition
will make clear to the public what types of conduct come within the
ambit of the regulation, as distinct from conduct not covered at all,
and what types of conduct will be eligible for the certification
regime.
The Department starts its analysis of the proper definition of the
term for regulatory purposes with the term's plain meaning. The
dictionary defines ``simulated'' as ``made to look genuine.'' Merriam-
Webster's Collegiate Dictionary 1162 (11th ed. 2003).
The Department believes that an objective standard--that is, one
defined in terms of a reasonable person viewing the depiction--is
appropriate to add to this basic definition. The proposed rule's
definition of ``simulated sexually explicit conduct'' thus reads as
follows: ``[S]imulated sexually explicit conduct means conduct engaged
in by performers in a visual depiction that is intended to appear as if
the performers are engaged in actual sexually explicit conduct and does
so appear to a reasonable viewer.''
No federal court has interpreted the definition of ``simulated'' in
the context of chapter 110. The definition above, however, is based on
the plain meaning of the term and is supported by extrinsic sources of
meaning. Chapter 110 was created by the Protection of Children Against
Sexual Exploitation Act of 1977, which defined ``sexually explicit
conduct'' to include both ``actual or simulated'' acts. See Protection
of Children Against Sexual Exploitation Act of 1977, Public Law 95-225,
Sec. 2(a), 92 Stat. 7 (1978). That statute did not define
``simulated,'' however, and the legislative history of the act does not
indicate that Congress considered defining that term. See S. Rep. No.
438, 95th Cong., 1st Sess. (1977); H.R. Report No. 696, 95th Cong., 1st
Sess. (1977). When Congress amended chapter 110 in 1984, it considered
defining ``simulated'' but ultimately did not do so, thereby leaving
the definition of that term to the discretion of the Attorney General.
As noted above, most states have laws similar to the federal
statute criminalizing production, distribution, and possession of
simulated sexually explicit conduct involving a minor. A number of
those states' statutes, in contrast to section 2257A, define
``simulated,'' and therefore may inform the federal definition of that
term in part 75. State definitions of ``simulated'' generally fall into
three categories:
[[Page 32265]]
(1) Definitions based on giving the appearance of actual sexually
explicit conduct. For example: ``An act is simulated when it gives the
appearance of being sexual conduct.'' Cal. Penal Code Sec.
311.4(d)(1); 14 V.I. Code Sec. 1027(b). ```Simulated sexually explicit
conduct' means a feigned or pretended act of sexually explicit conduct
which duplicates, within the perception of an average person, the
appearance of an actual act of sexually explicit conduct.'' Utah Code
Ann. Sec. 76-5a-2(9). ``Sexual intercourse is simulated when it
depicts explicit sexual intercourse which gives the appearance of the
consummation of sexual intercourse, normal or perverted.''
Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 272, Sec. 31; N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. Sec. 649-
A:2(III).
(2) Definitions based on depiction of genitals that gives the
impression of actual sexually explicit conduct, such as: ```Simulated'
means any depicting of the genitals or rectal areas that gives the
appearance of sexual conduct or incipient sexual conduct.'' Ariz. Rev.
Stat. Sec. 13-3551(10); Miss. Code Ann. Sec. 97-5-31(f); Mont. Code
Ann. Sec. 45-5-620(2).
(3) Definitions based on (a) the depiction of uncovered portions of
the body and (b) that gives the impression of actual sexually explicit
conduct, such as: ```Simulated' means the explicit depiction of
[sexual] conduct * * *which creates the appearance of such conduct and
which exhibits any uncovered portion of the breasts, genitals, or
buttocks.'' Fla. Stat. Sec. 827.071(1)(i). ```Simulated' means the
explicit depiction of sexual conduct that creates the appearance of
actual sexual conduct and during which a person engaging in the conduct
exhibits any uncovered portion of the breasts, genitals, or buttocks.''
Tex. Penal Code Sec. 43.25(a)(6). ```Simulated' means the explicit
depiction of any [sexual] conduct * * * which creates the appearance of
such conduct and which exhibits any uncovered portion of the breasts,
genitals or buttocks.'' N.Y. Penal L. Sec. 263.00(6).
The definitions categorized above as ``based on giving the
appearance of actual sexually explicit conduct'' are closest to that
proposed by the Department in this proposed rule. The other two
definitions, which require the actual depiction of nudity, are overly
restrictive in that a child may be exploited in the production of a
visual depiction of simulated sexually explicit conduct even if no
nudity is present in the final version of the visual depiction. The
producer of the depiction may arrange the camera or the body positions
to avoid depicting uncovered genitals, breasts, or buttocks yet still
cause harm to the child by having him or her otherwise realistically
appear to be engaging in sexually explicit conduct.
It is also important to note that ``simulated'' in this context
does not mean ``virtual.'' For purposes of chapter 110, including
sections 2256, 2257, and 2257A, and for purposes of part 75,
``simulated sexual explicit conduct'' means conduct engaged in by real
human beings, not conduct engaged in by computer-generated images that
only appear to be real human beings. Although Congress did attempt to
criminalize production, distribution, and possession of ``virtual''
child pornography on the basis that it contributed to the market in
child pornography involving real children, the Supreme Court held that
the child-protection rationale for the criminalization of child
pornography under Ferber did not apply to images in which no real
children were harmed. See Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition, 535 U.S.
234, 250-51 (2002). Section 2257A does not cover such ``virtual'' child
pornography, but rather ``simulated'' sexually explicit conduct, the
production of which, as noted above, can exploit a real child. The
Court's decision in Ashcroft is thus not relevant to sections 2257 or
2257A, or part 75, which for clarity's sake consistently refers to
sexually explicit conduct engaged in by an ``actual human being.''
Exemption From Statutory Requirements for Visual Depictions of
Lascivious Exhibition or Simulated Sexually Explicit Conduct in Certain
Circumstances and an Associated Certification Regime
As outlined above, Congress in the Act filled two gaps left by the
original section 2257 by amending section 2257 to cover lascivious
exhibition and by enacting section 2257A to cover simulated sexually
explicit conduct. In enacting section 2257A, Congress determined it
would be appropriate, in certain circumstances, to exempt producers of
visual depictions of lascivious exhibition (for which records must be
kept under section 2257, as amended by the Act) and producers of visual
depictions of simulated sexually explicit conduct (for which records
must be kept under section 2257A) from statutory requirements otherwise
applicable to such visual depictions. See 18 U.S.C. 2257A(h).
The safe harbor provision in the statute in essence permits certain
producers of visual depictions of lascivious exhibition or simulated
sexually explicit conduct to certify that in the normal course of
business they collect and maintain records to confirm that performers
in those depictions are not minors, while not necessarily collected and
maintained in the format required by part 75. Where a producer makes
the required certification, matter containing such visual depictions is
not subject to the labeling requirements of the statute.
The Department has crafted a certification regime (described in
detail below) that implements the safe harbor in such a way as to
permit such producers, in accordance with the statute, to be subject to
lesser record-keeping burdens than those in part 75, while still
protecting children from sexual exploitation.
Who May Certify
Any entity that meets the statutory requirements for eligibility,
which are incorporated verbatim in the proposed rule, may certify that
it meets the requirements of section 2257A(h). In addition, an entity
may certify for sub-entities that it owns or controls if the names of
the sub-entities are listed in such certification and are cross-
referenced to the matter for which the sub-entity served as the
producer.
Both United States and foreign entities may certify. In the case of
a certification by a foreign entity, the foreign entity, which may be
unlikely to collect and maintain information in accordance with United
States federal and state tax and other laws, may certify that it
maintains the required information in accordance with their foreign
equivalents. The Department considers the statute's broad description
of laws and other documentation that satisfy the certification to
provide authority for this treatment of foreign entities.
The certification must be signed by the chief executive officer of
the entity making the certification, or in the event an entity does not
have a chief executive officer, the senior manager responsible for
overseeing the entity's activities.
The certification regime in the proposed rule is similar for
producers of lascivious exhibition and producers of simulated sexually
explicit conduct but differs in some material respects, as described
below.
Time Period for Certification
The certification must be filed every two years. The Department
could have chosen a shorter period for certification, a longer period,
or a permanent certification. The Department believes, however, that
two years is a reasonable period to ensure that certifications remain
up to date without imposing
[[Page 32266]]
overly onerous burdens on regulated entities.
In order to establish certifications on the record as soon as
possible, the Department will require an initial certification due 180
days after the publication of this proposed rule as a final rule. This
schedule will provide sufficient time for entities to determine if they
wish to certify in compliance with the regulatory requirements. All
subsequent certifications will be due on the same date at two-year
intervals. The initial certification and all subsequent certifications
must be filed within a period of five business days concluding on the
due date (i.e., if the due date were on a Friday, and there were no
federal holiday during that week, the certification would have to be
filed on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, or Friday of that week).
The Department must have confidence that the certification covers all
depictions subject to record-keeping requirements for the previous
period. Initial certifications of producers who begin production after
the publication of this proposed rule but before the expiration of the
180-day period preceding its publication as a final rule will be due
within a period of five business days concluding on the last day of the
180-day period. Initial certifications of producers who begin
production after the expiration of the 180-day period, but before the
expiration of the two-year period following the 180-day period, are due
within 60 days of the start of production (unless the start of
production occurs within 60 days of the expiration of the two-year
period, in which case the certifications are due on the expiration date
of the two-year period). In any case where a due date or last day of a
time period falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or federal holiday, the due
date or last day of a time period is considered to run until the next
day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or federal holiday.
Enforcement of the Certification
All of the statements in the certification are subject to
investigation and a false certification will violate section 2257A and
potentially other criminal statutes.
Form and Content of the Certification
The certification regime in the proposed rule requires that a
producer provide a letter to the Attorney General that:
(1) Sets out the statutory basis under which it and any sub-
entities, if applicable, are permitted to avail themselves of the safe
harbor;
(2) Certifies that regularly and in the normal course of business,
the producer and any sub-entities, if applicable, collect and maintain
individually identifiable information regarding all performers employed
by the producer who appear in visual depictions of simulated sexually
explicit conduct or of lascivious exhibition;
(3) Lists the titles, names, or other identifying information of
visual depictions (or matter containing them) that include non-employee
performers;
(4) Lists the titles, names, or other identifying information of
visual depictions (or matter containing them) produced since the last
certification;
(5) Certifies that any foreign producers of visual depictions
acquired by the certifying entity either maintain the records required
by section 2257A or have themselves provided certifications to the
Attorney General, and the producers making the certifications have
copies of those records or certifications; or, for visual depictions of
simulated sexually explicit conduct only, have taken reasonable steps
to confirm that the performers are not minors;
(6) Lists the titles, names, or other identifying information of
the foreign-produced visual depictions (or matter containing them) that
include performers for whom no information is available but for whom
the U.S. entity has taken reasonable steps to confirm that the
performers are not minors;
(7) Certifies that U.S. primary producers of visual depictions
acquired by the certifying entity either maintain the records required
by section 2257A or certify themselves under the statute's safe harbor,
and that the producer making the certification has copies of those
records or certification(s). See 28 CFR 75.1(c)(1) (defining a primary
producer as ``any person who actually films, videotapes, photographs,
or creates'' a visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct).
Statutory Basis for the Certification
The first requirement listed above is straightforward--the entity
providing the certification must state why it is entitled to certify
under the terms of the statute. This will include citation to the
specific subsections of the statute under which it is making the
certification and to basic evidence justifying that citation.
Specifically, the letter should either cite 18 U.S.C. 2257A(h)(1)(A)
and 28 CFR 75.9 and state that the visual depictions listed in the
letter are ``intended for commercial distribution,'' ``created as a
part of a commercial enterprise'' that meets the requirements of 18
U.S.C. 2257A(h)(1)(A)(ii), and are ``not produced, marketed or made
available * * * in circumstances such tha[t] an ordinary person would
conclude that * * * [they] contain a visual depiction that is child
pornography as defined in section 2256(8)'' or cite 18 U.S.C.
2257A(h)(1)(B) and 28 CFR 75.9 and state that the visual depictions
listed in the letter are ``subject to regulation by the Federal
Communications Commission acting in its capacity to enforce 18 U.S.C.
1464 regarding the broadcast of obscene, indecent or profane
programming'' and are ``created as a part of a commercial enterprise''
that meets the requirements of 18 U.S.C. 2257A(h)(1)(B)(ii).
Certification of Collection and Maintenance of Records
The second requirement is the certification under either subsection
2257A(h)(1)(A)(ii) or (B)(ii). Under either subsection, the certifier
must demonstrate its compliance with the following five enumerated
elements: the entity (1) ``regularly and in the normal course of
business collects and maintains'' (2) ``individually identifiable
information'' (3) ``regarding all performers, including minor
performers employed by [the entity]'' (4) ``pursuant to Federal and
State tax, labor, and other laws, labor agreements, or otherwise
pursuant to industry standards'' (5) ``where such information includes
the name, address, and date of birth of the performer.'' The Department
will consider any entity's procedures that include these basic elements
to be in compliance with the certification.
To the extent that these terms are not self-explanatory, the
proposed rule defines them as follows:
``Regularly and in the normal course of business collects and
maintains'' means any business practice(s) that ensure that the
producer confirms the identity and age of employees who perform in
visual depictions of sexually explicit conduct.
``Individually identifiable information'' means that information
about the name, address, and date of birth is capable of being
retrieved for any employee who appears in a specified visual depiction.
``All performers, including minor performers'' means all performers
who appear, no matter how briefly, in a visual depiction of lascivious
exhibition or simulated sexually explicit conduct. The term ``minor''
in the statute could be interpreted to mean performers under the age of
18, which is the way the term ``minor'' is used elsewhere in chapter
110. Such an interpretation in this context, however, would be
redundant, as the purpose of the record-keeping
[[Page 32267]]
requirements is to ensure record-keeping for ``all performers,'' the
first term in the phrase. Hence, the Department interprets the term to
refer to performers who appear for only a limited period of time in the
context of the overall visual depiction. ``All performers, including
minor performers'' does not mean all performers in any matter that may
contain a discrete (or several discrete) visual depictions of
lascivious exhibition or simulated sexually explicit conduct. Rather,
it means only those performers in the discrete visual depiction(s).
That is, an entity that produces a two-hour-long movie containing a
single visual depiction of lascivious exhibition or simulated sexually
explicit conduct lasting five minutes need only collect and maintain
records on the performers in that five-minute visual depiction.
``Employed by'' means performers who receive pay for performing in
the visual depictions or are otherwise in an employer-employee
relationship with the producer of the visual depiction as evidenced by
oral or written agreements. This definition is important, because by
use of the term ``employed by,'' the statute appears to permit a
producer to make the certification even if there are performers who
appear in its visual depictions for whom it does not regularly and in
the normal course of business collect and maintain individually
identifiable information. It is possible, for example, that persons
with whom the producer has no employer-employee relationship may appear
in the background of a visual depiction or may engage in sexually
explicit conduct in the background of a depiction of non-sexually
explicit conduct. Because of the language of the statute, a producer in
that circumstance may still certify and remove itself from the coverage
of the entire record-keeping requirements of the section, even without
collecting and maintaining individually identifiable information for
the non-employee performers. The language of the statute permits no
other construction of the certification regime.
As a result of this language, however, there is a risk that a
performer who is a minor could appear in a depiction produced by an
entity that has made a certification and not be detected because the
minor was not ``employed by'' the certifying entity. In addition, there
is a risk that a producer may seek to evade the record-keeping
requirements by certifying that he maintains records on all employees
and then producing his visual depictions with performers--such as his
own children--whom he claims are not his employees.
In the first case, the Department recognizes that a producer might
not collect and maintain regularly and in the normal course of business
individually identifiable information on non-employees. At the same
time, the Department believes that the scenario described above--that
is, the production of visual depictions of lascivious exhibition or of
simulated sexually explicit conduct in which bona fide non-employees
perform--will be very rare.
The Department is more concerned about the possibility of evasion,
as in the second scenario described above. For that reason, the
Department has included a slightly broader definition of ``employed
by'' than simply financial remuneration. The definition would include
anyone who, even if not for pay, intentionally performs or is required
to perform in a visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct intended
for commercial distribution that is produced by someone meeting the
definition of a primary or secondary producer. See 28 CFR 75.1(c)(2)
(generally defining a ``secondary producer'' as ``any person who
produces, assembles, manufactures, publishes, duplicates, reproduces,
or reissues'' a visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct).
The Department considers it unnecessary to define the phrase
``pursuant to Federal and State tax, labor, and other laws, labor
agreements, or otherwise pursuant to industry standards.'' As guidance
to employers, however, the Department will consider any document that
contains a verified name, address, and date of birth of a performer to
satisfy this requirement.
The Department considers the phrase ``where such information
includes the name, address, and date of birth of the performer'' to be
self-explanatory.
List of the Titles, Names, or Other Identifying Information of Visual
Depictions That Include Non-Employee Performers
As an extra precaution against evasion, the third requirement is a
list of all visual depictions or matter containing visual depictions in
which non-employees have engaged in sexually explicit conduct. This
provides the Department with notice and a record that such visual
depictions by the producers exist and, if necessary, enables the
Department to investigate the bona fides of the certifying entity. At
the same time, the list is not so burdensome as to vitiate the purpose
of the certification regime in the first instance, namely, reducing the
burdensomeness of the record-keeping requirements. Rather than
maintaining age verification records, copies of each performance, etc.,
the certifying entities need only provide a list of their productions
that include depictions of lascivious exhibition or simulated sexually
explicit conduct by non-employee performers.
List of the Titles, Names, or Other Identifying Information of Visual
Depictions Produced Since the Last Certification
The fourth requirement is necessary to provide the Department with
both a notice and a record regarding which depictions or matters are
subject to the certification. The Department considered simply allowing
entities to make a blanket assertion that they maintain the required
records on all employees who perform in all matter they produce. The
Department determined, however, that depiction-specific information
will enable investigators more easily to determine whether a visual
depiction is covered by the section 2257A certification regime. The
list submitted by a certifying entity must include the titles, names,
or other identifying information of visual depictions acquired by the
certifying entity from foreign or U.S. primary producers.
Certification for Entities Acquiring Foreign-Produced Matter
The fifth requirement is a subsidiary certification for entities
acquiring matter subject to the record-keeping requirements from
foreign producers. The Department understands that many producers in
the United States acquire films and other matter that may contain
visual depictions of lascivious exhibition or simulated sexually
explicit conduct from producers abroad. In order to produce that matter
for the U.S. market and comply with the law, the U.S. entity acquiring
the matter must certify either that the foreign producer in the first
instance maintained the records required by the statute and that the
U.S. entity has copies of those records, or that the foreign entity has
certified on its own that it (the foreign producer) maintains foreign-
equivalent records in the normal course of business, and that the U.S.
entity has a copy of that certification. The Department believes it is
appropriate for the exemption to apply based on certifications that
foreign producers maintain foreign-equivalent records because foreign
countries generally have tax and employment laws requiring
identification of employees that are
[[Page 32268]]
substantially similar to requirements under U.S. law.
There may be cases where a U.S. entity acquires foreign-produced
matter and cannot certify the information above. In such a case, the
U.S. entity would not be able to produce the matter in the United
States. Denying the market in the United States access to a large
amount of foreign-produced matter, however, could be construed as a
burden on American citizens' First Amendment right to free expression.
At the same time, the Department cannot risk permitting either foreign
children to be exploited in the visual depictions produced for the U.S.
market or evasion of the statute by unscrupulous U.S. producers.
Therefore, U.S. entities making the certification may certify that
to the extent that they have acquired visual depictions or matter
containing visual depictions of simulated sexually explicit conduct
from foreign entities and to the extent that the primary foreign
producer does not either maintain the records required by the statute
or provide a certification to the Attorney General itself, the entity
making the certification has made reasonable efforts to ensure that no
performer in any such foreign visual depiction is a minor.
The same process will not be available for visual depictions of
lascivious exhibition acquired from foreign entities. The risks of
exploitation of children in such visual depictions and the risk of
evasion of the record-keeping requirements are too great to permit the
accommodation for visual depictions of simulated sexually explicit
conduct outlined above. The Department is concerned that providing a
method for weaker enforcement of section 2257 with regard to lascivious
exhibition would undermine the existing section 2257 requirements. The
Department notes, however, that Congress clearly considered non-
compliance with record-keeping requirements concerning visual
depictions of simulated sexually explicit conduct (under section 2257A)
to be a less serious crime than non-compliance with analogous
requirements for visual depictions of actual sexually explicit conduct
(under section 2257), as exemplified by the misdemeanor penalty for
violation of the former section versus the felony penalty for violation
of the latter section.
List of All Foreign-Acquired Matter for Which Records of Performers Are
Not Available
The sixth requirement is that the entity making the certification
must include a list of the visual depictions or matter including those
visual depictions for which no records exist but for which the
certifying entity has made reasonable efforts to ensure that no
performer in any visual depiction is a minor. As with the case of non-
employee performers, this list will provide the Department with notice
and a record that such visual depictions exist and if necessary, enable
investigation of such matter. At the same time, the requirement of the
list and a certification of reasonable efforts by the secondary
producer in the United States will provide significant protection
without unduly infringing on constitutional rights. The risk of evasion
is mitigated by the severe criminal penalties for production of child
pornography that would apply to any matter covered by the record-
keeping requirements.
Certification of Record-Keeping by Primary Producers
The seventh requirement is that, as with foreign primary producers,
an entity acquiring visual depictions must certify either that the
primary producer in the first instance maintained the records required
by the statute and that the certifying entity has copies of those
records, or that the primary producer has certified separately that it
(the primary producer) has made a certification and that the acquiring
entity has a copy of that certification.
Effective Dates
In accordance with current law, the proposed rule retains July 3,
1995, as the effective date of the rule's requirements for secondary
producers related to depictions of actual sexually explicit conduct.
(The current regulations, published in 2005, adopted July 3, 1995, as
the effective date of enforcement of section 2257 based on the court's
order in American Library Association v. Reno, No. 91-0394 (SS) (D.D.C.
July 28, 1995)) The proposed rule also states that producers of visual
depictions of actual sexually explicit conduct made after July 3, 1995,
the effective date of the regulations published in 1992, and before
June 23, 2005, the effective date of the current regulations published
in 2005, may rely on picture identification cards issued by private
entities such as schools or private employers that were valid forms of
required identification documentation under the provisions of part 75
in effect on the original production date. Finally, the proposed rule's
effective date concerning depictions of simulated sexually explicit
conduct will be 90 days after its publication in the Federal Register
as a final rule.
Regulatory Procedures
Regulatory Flexibility Act
In accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612
(``RFA''), the Department of Justice has drafted this proposed rule to
minimize its impact on small businesses while meeting its intended
objectives. Based upon the preliminary information available to the
Department through past investigations and enforcement actions
involving the affected industry, the Department is unable to state with
certainty that this rule, if promulgated as a final rule, will not have
any effect on small businesses of the type described in 5 U.S.C.
601(3). Accordingly, the Department has prepared a final RFA analysis
in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 604, as follows:
A. Need for and Objectives of This Rule
The identity of every performer is critical to determining and
assuring that no performer is a minor. The key congressional concern,
evidenced by the child exploitation statutory scheme, was that all such
performers of actual or simulated sexually explicit conduct verifiably
not be minors, i.e. , not younger than 18 years of age. See 18 U.S.C.
2256(1), 2257(b)(1), 2257A(b)(1). Congress has recognized that minors
warrant special concern in this area. Children themselves are incapable
of giving voluntary and knowing consent to perform or to enter into
contracts to perform such conduct. In addition, children often are
forced to engage involuntarily in sexually explicit conduct. For these
reasons, visual depictions of actual and simulated sexually explicit
conduct that involve persons under the age of 18 constitute unlawful
child pornography. See 18 U.S.C. 2256(8).
This proposed rule amends certain provisions of the existing
regulations and adds other provisions to these regulations to conform
to the Act, as described above.
B. Description and Estimates of the Number of Small Entities Affected
by This Rule
The RFA defines a ``small business'' as equivalent to a ``small
business concern'' under the Small Business Act (``SBA''). See 5 U.S.C.
601(3)
[[Page 32269]]
(incorporating by reference the definition of ``small business
concern'' in 15 U.S.C. 632). Under the SBA, a ``small-business
concern'' is one that (1) is independently owned and operated, (2) is
not dominant in its field of operation, and (3) meets any additional
criteria established by the SBA. See 15 U.S.C. 632(a).
Based upon the information available to the Department, there are
likely to be a significant number of small businesses that are
producers of visual depictions of simulated sexually explicit conduct.
Pursuant to the RFA, the Department requests affected small
businesses to estimate what these regulations will cost as a percentage
of their total revenues in order to enable the Department to ensure
that small businesses are not unduly burdened.
The proposed rule has no effect on State or local governmental
agencies.
C. Specific Requirements Imposed That Would Impact Private Companies
The proposed rule imposes requirements on private companies with
respect to visual depictions of simulated sexually explicit conduct to
ensure that minors are not used in such depictions. Specifically, the
rule imposes certain name- and age-verification and record-keeping
requirements on producers of visual depictions of simulated sexually
explicit conduct concerning the performers portrayed in those
depictions. The proposed rule, however, provides an exemption from
these requirements applicable in certain circumstances.
Executive Order 12866
This proposed rule has been drafted and reviewed in accordance with
Executive Order 12866, Sec. 1(b), Principles of Regulation. The
Department has determined that this rule is a ``significant regulatory
action'' under Executive Order 12866, Sec. 3(f). Accordingly, this
rule has been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
The benefit of the rule is that children will be protected from
exploitation in the production of visual depictions of simulated
sexually explicit conduct by ensuring that only those who are at least
18 years of age perform in such depictions. The costs to the industry
include what the Department believes to be slightly higher record-
keeping costs. The Department encourages all affected commercial
entities to provide specific estimates, wherever possible, of the
economic costs that this rule will impose on them.
Executive Order 13132
This regulation will not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive
Order 13132, it is determined that this rule does not have sufficient
federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism
Assessment.
Executive Order 12988
This regulation meets the applicable standards set forth in
Executive Order 12988 Sec. 3(a), (b)(2).
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local and
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year, and it will not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed
necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995, 2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as defined by section 251 of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. See 5
U.S.C. 804. This rule will not result in an annual effect on the
economy of $100,000,000 or more; a major increase in costs or prices
for consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local
government agencies, or geographic regions; or significant adverse
effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity,
innovation, or the ability of United States-based companies to compete
with foreign-based companies in domestic and export markets.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule expands the scope of existing requirements to
conform to newly enacted legislation. It also implements the newly
enacted legislation's exemption from these expanded requirements
applicable in certain cases. It contains a revised collection of
information that clarifies the means of maintaining and organizing the
required documents.
The Department has submitted the following information-collection
request to the Office of Management and Budget (``OMB'') for review and
clearance in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The
proposed collection of information is published to obtain comments from
the public.
Any comments received during the comment period should address one
or more of the following four points: (1) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will
have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of
the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (3) how to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected;
and (4) how to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g. , permitting
electronic submission of responses.
Overview of this collection of information:
(1) Type of collection of information: Revision of a currently
approved collection.
(2) Title: Inspection of Records Relating to Depictions of
Simulated Sexually Explicit Performances.
(3) Agency form number, if any: None.
(4) Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as
well as a brief abstract:
Primary: Business or other for-profit entities.
Other: None.
Abstract: This rule proposes to amend the record-keeping, labeling,
and inspection requirements of 28 CFR part 75 to account for the
enactment of the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006.
(5) An estimate of the total number of respondents, the amount of
time estimated for an average respondent to respond, and the total
public burden (in hours) associated with the collection:
The Department is unable to estimate with any precision the number
of entities producing visual depictions of simulated sexually explicit
conduct. Because the issue of the number of entities producing visual
depictions of simulated sexually explicit conduct is a new issue that
has arisen precisely because of section 2257A, there does not appear to
be much available information concerning the number of entities
producing such material. As a partial indication, according to the U.S.
Census Bureau, in 2002 there were 11,163 establishments engaged in
motion picture and video production in the United States. Based on a
rough assumption that 10% were engaged in
[[Page 32270]]
the production of visual depictions of simulated sexually explicit
conduct, the Department estimates that approximately 1116 motion
picture and video producing establishments would be covered. (The
Department does not certify this estimate and invites comment on the
assumptions upon which it is based.) The underlying statute provides an
exemption from these requirements applicable in certain circumstances,
and it requires producers to submit certifications to qualify for this
exemption. The Department has no information concerning the number of
otherwise covered entities that would qualify for this statutory
exemption, nor is it able to estimate this number. For entities that
qualify for the statutory exemption, however, the Department estimates
that it would take less than 20 hours per year at an estimated cost of
less than $25.00 per hour to prepare the biennial certification
required for the statutory exemption. The Department's burden hour
estimate for preparing the biennial certification required for the
statutory exemption recognizes that the certification must take the
form of a letter indicating that the producer regularly and in the
normal course of business collects and maintains individually
identifiable information regarding all performers employed by that
person, and shall include a list of the titles, names, or other
identifying information of visual depictions of simulated sexually
explicit conduct or lascivious exhibition produced since the last
certification, as well as a list of the titles, names, or other
identifying information of visual depictions of simulated sexually
explicit conduct or lascivious exhibition that include non-employee
performers. The Department assumes that the certification's main burden
would be to require producers to maintain a list of the visual
depictions produced during the certification period, and that the
majority of the work to prepare the certification would be performed by
administrative staff. Based on the Department's assumption that 90% of
such entities would qualify for the exemption, the total annual cost
for the entities qualifying for the statutory exemption would be
approximately $21,500 per year. Again, the Department does not certify
the accuracy of these numbers and invites comment on the assumptions
outlined above.
Based on the Department's assumption that 3,000,000 visual
depictions of simulated sexually explicit conduct are created each year
and that it requires 6 minutes to complete the record-keeping
requirement for each depiction, the record-keeping requirements would
impose a burden of 300,000 hours. Based on the Department's assumption
that producers of 90% of these depictions would qualify for the
statutory exemption from these requirements, the requirements would
only impose a burden of 30,000 hours. Assuming further that the record
keeping requirements will cost $6.00 per hour to complete and $0.05 for
each image of a verifiable form of identification, the total annual
cost for the 10% of entities not qualifying for the statutory exemption
would be $181,500. Again, the Department does not certify the accuracy
of these numbers and invites comment on the assumptions outlined above.
The Department notes that steps taken to minimize the burden of
these requirements on small entities include the statutory exemption
requiring only that such entities prepare the certification necessary
for the exemption.
All comments and suggestions, or questions regarding additional
information, should be directed to Andrew Oosterbaan, Chief, Child
Exploitation and Obscenity Section, Criminal Division, United States
Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20530; (202) 514-5780. This is
not a toll-free number. Comments should also be sent to: Lynn Bryant,
Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice, Policy and
Planning Staff, Justice Management Division, Patrick Henry Building,
601 D Street, NW, Washington, DC 20530.
List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 75
Crime, Infants and children, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the preamble, part 75 of
chapter I of title 28 of the Code of Federal Regulations is proposed to
be amended as follows:
PART 75--CHILD PROTECTION RESTORATION AND PENALTIES ENHANCEMENT ACT
OF 1990; PROTECT ACT; ADAM WALSH CHILD PROTECTION AND SAFETY ACT OF
2006; RECORD-KEEPING AND RECORD INSPECTION PROVISIONS
1. The authority citation for part 75 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: 18 U.S.C. 2257, 2257A.
2. The title of part 75 is revised to read as set forth above.
3. Amend Sec. 75.1 by revising paragraphs (c)(1), (c)(2), (c)(4)
introductory text, and (d), and further amend as proposed on July 12,
2007, at 72 FR 38038 by revising paragraph (m) and adding paragraphs
(o), (p), (q), (r), and (s), to read as follows:
Sec. 75.1 Definitions.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) Primary producer is any person who actually films, videotapes,
photographs, or creates a digitally or computer-manipulated image, a
digital image, or picture, or digitizes an image, of a visual depiction
of an actual human being engaged in actual or simulated sexually
explicit conduct.
(2) Secondary producer is any person who produces, assembles,
manufactures, publishes, duplicates, reproduces, or reissues a book,
magazine, periodical, film, videotape, digitally or computer-
manipulated image, picture, or other matter intended for commercial
distribution that contains a visual depiction of an actual human being
engaged in actual or simulated sexually explicit conduct, or who
inserts on a computer site or service a digital image of, or otherwise
manages the sexually explicit content of a computer site or service
that contains a visual depiction of an actual human being engaged in
actual or simulated sexually explicit conduct, including any person who
enters into a contract, agreement, or conspiracy to do any of the
foregoing.
* * * * *
(4) Producer does not include persons whose activities relating to
the visual depiction of actual or simulated sexually explicit conduct
are limited to the following:
* * * * *
(d) Sell, distribute, redistribute, and re-release refer to
commercial distribution of a book, magazine, periodical, film,
videotape, digitally or computer-manipulated image, digital image,
picture, or other matter that contains a visual depiction of an actual
human being engaged in actual or simulated sexually explicit conduct,
but does not refer to noncommercial or educational distribution of such
matter, including transfers conducted by bona fide lending libraries,
museums, schools, or educational organizations.
* * * * *
(m) Date of original production or original production date means
the date the primary producer actually filmed, videotaped, or
photographed, or created a digitally or computer-manipulated image,
digital image, or picture, of the visual depiction of an actual human
being engaged in actual or simulated sexually explicit conduct.
* * * * *
[[Page 32271]]
(o) Simulated sexually explicit conduct means conduct engaged in by
performers in a visual depiction that is intended to appear to be
actual sexually explicit conduct and does so appear to a reasonable
viewer.
(p) Regularly and in the normal course of business collects and
maintains means any business practice that ensures that the producer
confirms the identity and age of employees who perform in visual
depictions of sexually explicit conduct.